The pen is mightier than the sword

1. ARTICLE
The pen is mightier than the sword
 BY KRUTI-SHAH
 MAR 01, 2021 14:47

Most paradoxes area unit clever instead of true, however, there's enough to
be aforementioned for this one to convey it a minimum of the color of the
truth. Lord Bulwer-Lytton was a prolific and fashionable Victorian
author, however cognizant of his restricted powers, to not claim originality
for what's clearly associate degree ancient maxim. His play 'Richelieu' of
1839, at any rate, defines the interpretation, he himself would have placed
on it. Solon with adroitness saved himself from his enemies and scored them

2. off by his pertinent writing. Moreover, he enabled his country to sidestep
associate degree alliance with the European nation. Thus, the limits the
appliance of this borrowed contradiction:- 'Beneath the rule of men entirely
nice The pen is mightier than the sword ........... exclude the steel States
are often saved while not it.'
No doubt in his own day and age! however, there are unit aggressors whose
swords should be met by swords. There area unit the Hitlers of the globe
who dubs the written agreement of Versailles a 'scrap of paper.' There's the
pathetic 1938 image of solon waving another scrap of paper, as he came
from the meeting at Petrograd, promising the deluded British 'peace in our
time.' But no one may accuse dictator of 'greatness' in any true sense, or
Chamberlain of 'greatness' in any sense, at all, therefore Bulwer-Lytton may
even these days maintain his argument holds smart.
The unilateral disarmed believes that it holds smart in the least times; that
regardless of the temporary triumph of the steel, whether or not that 'sword'
takes the form of the bully's hand or the aggressor's nuclear bomb,
the triumph is ultimately gained by peaceful acceptance of tyranny,
probably while not even a written protest. That tyranny carried its own
seeds of destruction is true, however, history has many a case of such seeds
taking a really very long time to ripen. Meanwhile, millions suffer, and that
we mirror that abundant suffering might need been saved by steel raised in
defense. So the contradiction is at the best a deceit, however, the 0.5 that's
true is incredibly true so, as a result of we have a tendency to should outline
real 'might' as one thing aside from military power. Man is largely a
religious and mental instead of a physical creature. He is often additional
simply diode by the pen than driven by the steel, and there's ample proof
altogether spheres of writing to prove this.
The civilizing power of world religions down the ages has been myriad, and
therefore the protraction of faith has continuously trusted writing. The good
empire was Christianised by the Bible three hundred years once the lifetime

3. of Christ; these days, the purity of the Muslim means of life depends on
the education of the sacred text by the followers; the Vedas still inspire
scores of Indians, and therefore the record production of the Sayings of
Confucius by his disciples provided the idea of the social order of abundant
of the Far East. Trendy democratic theory owes abundant to the writings of
Aristotle, philosophy to those of philosophers, and law to those
of Caligula.
The pupil at Oxford these days begins by learning his 'Institutes'. On the
narrower canvas, social reformers have sees the newspaper and article and
particularly the novel as a method of stating their case and moving belief to
require action in their favor, thus creating valid gains for humanity. Charles
Kingsley's Water Babies' castigated the infamies of kid exploitation.
Harriet abolitionist writer, those of negro slavery, Charles Dickens, those
of a harsh system and of a society that condemned the multitude to the
financial condition and sophistication oppression. Humor and caustic
remark have a chiseler purpose than any steel. Even in times of tyranny and
oppressive laws, the lampoon and therefore the political 'broadsheet'
pilloried scorned public figures and establishments, preserved a way of
humor within the community, and typically gave pause to the pressers,
whereas physical attack or revolt would are penalized to the total extent of
the law.
'Punch' castigated the crown and therefore the attorney within the days once
no but two hundred felonies were punishable by death. In earlier days, Pope
and Dryden used the barbed end-rhymed couplet to ridicule dominant
political figures, who within the trendy, 'free' days would have won fantastic
libel damages. However the tyrant is often 'touchy', and therefore the pen
continuously finds the soft spot! And abroad, would like we have a tendency
to do over mention the explosive power of Voltaire and Rousseau, Marx
and Engels? And today, the mass-molding fashionable press, of that Homo
sapiens is turning into cordially sick. Today's would like is for freelance
and logical thought. Allow us to hope that this can follow each the pen and
therefore the steel within the hands of others.