SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Monitoring & Evaluation
By
Sam Lubasi
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
• Day-to-day follow up of activities duringDay-to-day follow up of activities during
implementation to measure progress andimplementation to measure progress and
identify deviationsidentify deviations
• Routine follow up to ensure activities areRoutine follow up to ensure activities are
proceeding as planned and are on scheduleproceeding as planned and are on schedule
• Routine assessment of activities and resultsRoutine assessment of activities and results
• Answers the question, “what are we doing?”Answers the question, “what are we doing?”
What is monitoring?
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
• Tracks inputs and outputs and compares themTracks inputs and outputs and compares them
to planto plan
• Identifies and addresses problemsIdentifies and addresses problems
• Ensures effective use of resourcesEnsures effective use of resources
• Ensures quality and learning to improveEnsures quality and learning to improve
activities and servicesactivities and services
• Strengthens accountabilityStrengthens accountability
• Program management toolProgram management tool
Why monitor activities?
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
• Episodic assessment of overallEpisodic assessment of overall
achievement and impactsachievement and impacts
• Systematic way of learning fromSystematic way of learning from
experienceexperience to IMPROVEto IMPROVE currentcurrent
activities and promote better planningactivities and promote better planning
forfor future actionfuture action
• Designed specifically with intention toDesigned specifically with intention to
attribute changes to intervention itselfattribute changes to intervention itself
• Answers the question, “what have weAnswers the question, “what have we
achieved and what impact have weachieved and what impact have we
What is evaluation?
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
• Determines program effectivenessDetermines program effectiveness
• Shows impactShows impact
• Strengthens financial responses andStrengthens financial responses and
accountabilityaccountability
• Promotes a learning culture focused onPromotes a learning culture focused on
service improvementservice improvement
• Promotes replication of successfulPromotes replication of successful
interventionsinterventions
Why evaluate activities?
M & E Process
INPUTS PROCESS OUTPUT OUTCOME IMPACT
Monitoring Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
TypeType PurposePurpose
Formative/Formative/
BaselineBaseline
Initial assessment of the target populations andInitial assessment of the target populations and
contextual environment. Determines concept andcontextual environment. Determines concept and
designdesign
Process /Mid-Process /Mid-
termterm
Seeks to identify the extent to which plannedSeeks to identify the extent to which planned
activities have been achieved and assesses theactivities have been achieved and assesses the
quality of the activities/servicesquality of the activities/services
OutcomeOutcome
/Endline/Endline
Examines specific program outcomes andExamines specific program outcomes and
accomplishments. What changes wereaccomplishments. What changes were
observed, what does it mean, and if changes areobserved, what does it mean, and if changes are
a result of the interventions?a result of the interventions?
ImpactImpact
/Endline/Expo/Endline/Expo
stst
Gauges the program’s overall impact andGauges the program’s overall impact and
effectiveness. Aims to strengthen design andeffectiveness. Aims to strengthen design and
replication of effective programs and strategiesreplication of effective programs and strategies
Types of evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
MonitoringMonitoring EvaluationEvaluation
Continuous: day-to-Continuous: day-to-
dayday
Periodic: importantPeriodic: important
milestonesmilestones
Documents progressDocuments progress In-depth analysis ofIn-depth analysis of
achievementsachievements
Focuses on inputs andFocuses on inputs and
outputsoutputs
Focuses on outcomesFocuses on outcomes
and impactsand impacts
Alerts managers toAlerts managers to
problemsproblems
Provides managersProvides managers
with strategy andwith strategy and
policy optionspolicy options
Self-assessmentSelf-assessment External analysisExternal analysis
Monitoring vs evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
LevelLevel DescriptionDescription FrequencyFrequency
InputsInputs Resources that are put into the project.Resources that are put into the project.
Lead to the achievement of theLead to the achievement of the
outputsoutputs
ContinuousContinuous
OutputsOutputs Activities or services that the project isActivities or services that the project is
providing. Outputs lead to outcomesproviding. Outputs lead to outcomes
QuarterlyQuarterly
OutcomeOutcome
ss
Changes in behaviors or skills as aChanges in behaviors or skills as a
result of the implemented project.result of the implemented project.
Outcomes are anticipated to lead toOutcomes are anticipated to lead to
impactsimpacts
2-3 years2-3 years
(short to(short to
medium term)medium term)
ImpactsImpacts Measurable changes in health status,Measurable changes in health status,
particularly reduced STI/HIVparticularly reduced STI/HIV
transmission and reduced AIDStransmission and reduced AIDS
impact. Impact results are effects ofimpact. Impact results are effects of
3-5 years3-5 years
(long term)(long term)
M&E Framework
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
 M&E should be part of the design of a program
 Ensures systematic reporting
 Communicates results and accountability
 Measures efficiency and effectiveness
 Provides information for improved decision
making
 Ensures effective allocation of resources
 Promotes continuous learning and improvement
Conclusion: Why M&E?
The End

More Related Content

What's hot

Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awanDifference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Malik Sajjad Ahmad Awan
 

What's hot (19)

Project Monitoring and Evaluation
Project Monitoring and Evaluation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
Project Monitoring and Evaluation
 
Monitoring indicators
Monitoring indicatorsMonitoring indicators
Monitoring indicators
 
Monitoring And Evaluation Presentation
Monitoring And Evaluation PresentationMonitoring And Evaluation Presentation
Monitoring And Evaluation Presentation
 
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
Monitoring and Evaluation: Lesson 2
 
Historical Method of Research
Historical Method of Research Historical Method of Research
Historical Method of Research
 
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awanDifference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
Difference between supervision and monitoring by sajjad awan
 
Presentation Training on Result Based Management (RBM) for M&E Staff
Presentation Training on Result Based Management (RBM) for M&E StaffPresentation Training on Result Based Management (RBM) for M&E Staff
Presentation Training on Result Based Management (RBM) for M&E Staff
 
project monitoring and evaluation
 project monitoring and evaluation project monitoring and evaluation
project monitoring and evaluation
 
Operational definition of of Monitoring and Evaluation Terms
Operational definition of of Monitoring and Evaluation TermsOperational definition of of Monitoring and Evaluation Terms
Operational definition of of Monitoring and Evaluation Terms
 
HOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTS
HOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTSHOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTS
HOW TO CARRY OUT MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROJECTS
 
Introduction to monitoring and evaluation Ungaluk Program 2015
Introduction to monitoring and evaluation Ungaluk Program 2015Introduction to monitoring and evaluation Ungaluk Program 2015
Introduction to monitoring and evaluation Ungaluk Program 2015
 
Project cycle
Project cycleProject cycle
Project cycle
 
Evaluation Capacity Development
Evaluation Capacity DevelopmentEvaluation Capacity Development
Evaluation Capacity Development
 
Monitoring and evaluation
Monitoring and evaluationMonitoring and evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation
 
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation
 
Project evaluation
Project evaluationProject evaluation
Project evaluation
 
7 M&E: Indicators
7 M&E: Indicators7 M&E: Indicators
7 M&E: Indicators
 
Monitoring and Evaluating
Monitoring and EvaluatingMonitoring and Evaluating
Monitoring and Evaluating
 
Project monitoring and control & planning for monitoring
Project monitoring and control & planning for monitoringProject monitoring and control & planning for monitoring
Project monitoring and control & planning for monitoring
 

Viewers also liked (6)

We
WeWe
We
 
Effect Of Many Body Interactions On Indices Of Refraction Of Alkali Halides
Effect Of Many Body Interactions On Indices Of Refraction Of Alkali HalidesEffect Of Many Body Interactions On Indices Of Refraction Of Alkali Halides
Effect Of Many Body Interactions On Indices Of Refraction Of Alkali Halides
 
We
WeWe
We
 
Nanotechnology,ppt by dr.imran aziz [compatibility mode]
Nanotechnology,ppt by dr.imran aziz [compatibility mode]Nanotechnology,ppt by dr.imran aziz [compatibility mode]
Nanotechnology,ppt by dr.imran aziz [compatibility mode]
 
Conducting Polymer By Imran Aziz
Conducting Polymer By Imran AzizConducting Polymer By Imran Aziz
Conducting Polymer By Imran Aziz
 
Plasma physics by Dr. imran aziz
Plasma physics by Dr. imran azizPlasma physics by Dr. imran aziz
Plasma physics by Dr. imran aziz
 

Similar to Monitoring & evaluation presentation

Presentation on M&E, Presented by Sushanta Kumar Sarker
Presentation on M&E, Presented by Sushanta Kumar SarkerPresentation on M&E, Presented by Sushanta Kumar Sarker
Presentation on M&E, Presented by Sushanta Kumar Sarker
Sushanta Kumar Sarker
 
Webinar: KPI Best Practices
Webinar: KPI Best Practices Webinar: KPI Best Practices
Webinar: KPI Best Practices
Ali Zeeshan
 
D6 e6 outcome based measurement from theory to implementation
D6 e6 outcome based measurement from theory to implementationD6 e6 outcome based measurement from theory to implementation
D6 e6 outcome based measurement from theory to implementation
ocasiconference
 

Similar to Monitoring & evaluation presentation (20)

Results Based Monitoring and Evaluation
Results Based Monitoring and EvaluationResults Based Monitoring and Evaluation
Results Based Monitoring and Evaluation
 
Introduction to M&E- WG1&2.ppt
Introduction to M&E- WG1&2.pptIntroduction to M&E- WG1&2.ppt
Introduction to M&E- WG1&2.ppt
 
Importance of M&E
Importance of M&EImportance of M&E
Importance of M&E
 
Presentation on M&E, Presented by Sushanta Kumar Sarker
Presentation on M&E, Presented by Sushanta Kumar SarkerPresentation on M&E, Presented by Sushanta Kumar Sarker
Presentation on M&E, Presented by Sushanta Kumar Sarker
 
Presentation on M&E, presented by Sushanta kumar sarker, Bangladesh
Presentation on M&E, presented by Sushanta kumar sarker, BangladeshPresentation on M&E, presented by Sushanta kumar sarker, Bangladesh
Presentation on M&E, presented by Sushanta kumar sarker, Bangladesh
 
Monitoring and Evaluation Lesson 2.pptx
Monitoring and Evaluation Lesson 2.pptxMonitoring and Evaluation Lesson 2.pptx
Monitoring and Evaluation Lesson 2.pptx
 
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and EvaluationMonitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation
 
What is evaluation
What is evaluation What is evaluation
What is evaluation
 
Ten_Steps_Results_Based_MESystem.ppt
Ten_Steps_Results_Based_MESystem.pptTen_Steps_Results_Based_MESystem.ppt
Ten_Steps_Results_Based_MESystem.ppt
 
37851 101218095128-phpapp02
37851 101218095128-phpapp0237851 101218095128-phpapp02
37851 101218095128-phpapp02
 
Performance evaluation
Performance evaluationPerformance evaluation
Performance evaluation
 
Establishing measurable performance expectations Feb 2019 Criterion Conferenc...
Establishing measurable performance expectations Feb 2019 Criterion Conferenc...Establishing measurable performance expectations Feb 2019 Criterion Conferenc...
Establishing measurable performance expectations Feb 2019 Criterion Conferenc...
 
Measuring the experience meaningful measurement for service blueprints and ...
Measuring the experience   meaningful measurement for service blueprints and ...Measuring the experience   meaningful measurement for service blueprints and ...
Measuring the experience meaningful measurement for service blueprints and ...
 
Measuring the experience meaningful measurement for service blueprints and ...
Measuring the experience   meaningful measurement for service blueprints and ...Measuring the experience   meaningful measurement for service blueprints and ...
Measuring the experience meaningful measurement for service blueprints and ...
 
Learning from Evaluation
Learning from EvaluationLearning from Evaluation
Learning from Evaluation
 
Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective
Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspectiveMonitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective
Monitoring & Evaluating projects & programs: A stakeholder perspective
 
Webinar: KPI Best Practices
Webinar: KPI Best Practices Webinar: KPI Best Practices
Webinar: KPI Best Practices
 
D6 e6 outcome based measurement from theory to implementation
D6 e6 outcome based measurement from theory to implementationD6 e6 outcome based measurement from theory to implementation
D6 e6 outcome based measurement from theory to implementation
 
Controlling
ControllingControlling
Controlling
 
Monitoring and evaluation presentation equi gov
Monitoring and evaluation presentation equi govMonitoring and evaluation presentation equi gov
Monitoring and evaluation presentation equi gov
 

Monitoring & evaluation presentation

  • 2. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) • Day-to-day follow up of activities duringDay-to-day follow up of activities during implementation to measure progress andimplementation to measure progress and identify deviationsidentify deviations • Routine follow up to ensure activities areRoutine follow up to ensure activities are proceeding as planned and are on scheduleproceeding as planned and are on schedule • Routine assessment of activities and resultsRoutine assessment of activities and results • Answers the question, “what are we doing?”Answers the question, “what are we doing?” What is monitoring?
  • 3. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) • Tracks inputs and outputs and compares themTracks inputs and outputs and compares them to planto plan • Identifies and addresses problemsIdentifies and addresses problems • Ensures effective use of resourcesEnsures effective use of resources • Ensures quality and learning to improveEnsures quality and learning to improve activities and servicesactivities and services • Strengthens accountabilityStrengthens accountability • Program management toolProgram management tool Why monitor activities?
  • 4. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) • Episodic assessment of overallEpisodic assessment of overall achievement and impactsachievement and impacts • Systematic way of learning fromSystematic way of learning from experienceexperience to IMPROVEto IMPROVE currentcurrent activities and promote better planningactivities and promote better planning forfor future actionfuture action • Designed specifically with intention toDesigned specifically with intention to attribute changes to intervention itselfattribute changes to intervention itself • Answers the question, “what have weAnswers the question, “what have we achieved and what impact have weachieved and what impact have we What is evaluation?
  • 5. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) • Determines program effectivenessDetermines program effectiveness • Shows impactShows impact • Strengthens financial responses andStrengthens financial responses and accountabilityaccountability • Promotes a learning culture focused onPromotes a learning culture focused on service improvementservice improvement • Promotes replication of successfulPromotes replication of successful interventionsinterventions Why evaluate activities?
  • 6. M & E Process INPUTS PROCESS OUTPUT OUTCOME IMPACT Monitoring Evaluation
  • 7. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) TypeType PurposePurpose Formative/Formative/ BaselineBaseline Initial assessment of the target populations andInitial assessment of the target populations and contextual environment. Determines concept andcontextual environment. Determines concept and designdesign Process /Mid-Process /Mid- termterm Seeks to identify the extent to which plannedSeeks to identify the extent to which planned activities have been achieved and assesses theactivities have been achieved and assesses the quality of the activities/servicesquality of the activities/services OutcomeOutcome /Endline/Endline Examines specific program outcomes andExamines specific program outcomes and accomplishments. What changes wereaccomplishments. What changes were observed, what does it mean, and if changes areobserved, what does it mean, and if changes are a result of the interventions?a result of the interventions? ImpactImpact /Endline/Expo/Endline/Expo stst Gauges the program’s overall impact andGauges the program’s overall impact and effectiveness. Aims to strengthen design andeffectiveness. Aims to strengthen design and replication of effective programs and strategiesreplication of effective programs and strategies Types of evaluation
  • 8. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) MonitoringMonitoring EvaluationEvaluation Continuous: day-to-Continuous: day-to- dayday Periodic: importantPeriodic: important milestonesmilestones Documents progressDocuments progress In-depth analysis ofIn-depth analysis of achievementsachievements Focuses on inputs andFocuses on inputs and outputsoutputs Focuses on outcomesFocuses on outcomes and impactsand impacts Alerts managers toAlerts managers to problemsproblems Provides managersProvides managers with strategy andwith strategy and policy optionspolicy options Self-assessmentSelf-assessment External analysisExternal analysis Monitoring vs evaluation
  • 9. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) LevelLevel DescriptionDescription FrequencyFrequency InputsInputs Resources that are put into the project.Resources that are put into the project. Lead to the achievement of theLead to the achievement of the outputsoutputs ContinuousContinuous OutputsOutputs Activities or services that the project isActivities or services that the project is providing. Outputs lead to outcomesproviding. Outputs lead to outcomes QuarterlyQuarterly OutcomeOutcome ss Changes in behaviors or skills as aChanges in behaviors or skills as a result of the implemented project.result of the implemented project. Outcomes are anticipated to lead toOutcomes are anticipated to lead to impactsimpacts 2-3 years2-3 years (short to(short to medium term)medium term) ImpactsImpacts Measurable changes in health status,Measurable changes in health status, particularly reduced STI/HIVparticularly reduced STI/HIV transmission and reduced AIDStransmission and reduced AIDS impact. Impact results are effects ofimpact. Impact results are effects of 3-5 years3-5 years (long term)(long term) M&E Framework
  • 10. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)  M&E should be part of the design of a program  Ensures systematic reporting  Communicates results and accountability  Measures efficiency and effectiveness  Provides information for improved decision making  Ensures effective allocation of resources  Promotes continuous learning and improvement Conclusion: Why M&E?

Editor's Notes

  1. Examples Formative assessment will identify who the target population is, where they live, lifestyles, culture etc. Anything that gives insight into the lives of the target audience that will help us to design an appropriate intervention Process: We are looking at how the actual implementation was done. If we had planned to recruit 20 peer educators, did we manage that, how did we do the recruitment, what were the challenges. Outcome: Did knowledge on HIV/AIDS increase because of our intervention, are more people using condoms, are people having less casual partners etc. You have to have had a baseline. If KAPB was conducted, it is repeating it and comparing results from before and after intervention. Impact: Did the program reduce the number of new infections, have we stopped or reduced the number of STIs, has the health of target population improved because of our program. The measurements for these require biological data which is not easy to collect. The required data may also need an experiment or long study. It is scientifically verified.
  2. Examples: Inputs: are things we put in the program such as the money to run the program, the human resources, training, equipment and any other resources we have put in to make the intervention possible. Outputs: are the activities or service we provided. How many peer educators did we recruit, train, how many meeting did we conduct, how many condoms did we distribute, how many people did we reach, how many information sessions did we conduct, what pamphlets or posters did we give etc Outcomes: have people changed their behaviors. Are people now using condoms, do they have less casual partners, are they abstaining, can they now insist on condom use, has their knowledge improved compare to before the program? Impact: Did the program reduce the number of new infections, have we stopped or reduced the number of STIs, has the health of target population improved because of our program?. The measurements for these require biological data which is not easy to collect. The required data may also need an experiment or long study. It is scientifically verified