Why did the European empires in the Americas have such an enormously greater impact on the conquered people than did the Chinese, Mughal and Ottoman empires in Asia on the conquered people? Use specific examples from the reading to support your points, so that you are persuasive in making your case. Solution Answer:- Winds in the Atlantic sea were more unsurprising and consistent than those in the Indian Ocean. The Indian Ocean had a vibrant market, so Chinese, Indian and Muslim members were not intrigued by wandering out into the Americas. Europe had mapmaking, shipbuilding and route procedures which empower control of the Atlantic. Europeans were roused because they knew about their negligible position in the rich world and were resolved to get entrance. Europe was recuperating from the Plague, and the best way to thrive was to obtain more land. European dealers never again needed to depend on Muslim delegates. Want for grain, sugar, meat and fish. Driven by competitions with contending states. Needed to spread Christendom. Minorities needed another life. Europeans were nearer to America\'s than the Asian states were. Winds in the Atlantic sea were more unsurprising and consistent than those in the Indian Ocean. The Indian Ocean had a vibrant market, so Chinese, Indian and Muslim members were not intrigued by wandering out into the Americas. Europe had mapmaking, shipbuilding and route procedures which empower control of the Atlantic. Europeans were roused because they knew about their negligible position in the rich world and were resolved to get entrance. Europe was recuperating from the Plague, and the best way to thrive was to obtain more land. European dealers never again needed to depend on Muslim delegates. Want for grain, sugar, meat and fish. Driven by competitions with contending states. Needed to spread Christendom. Minorities needed another life. Infections that the local people groups of the Americas had no resistances to arrived in some cases even before the European pioneers themselves, and either significantly debilitated or wiped out their populaces. Another preferred standpoint that the Europeans had was their black powder weapons (the local people groups had none at first), and their many tamed creatures that they carried with them. There is additionally a characteristic rough streak in the European culture and mentality, and Christianity is a zealous religion: both were helpers. Blended race offspring was absorbed into culture instead of distinguishes as particular groups, for example, in Latin America. Similarly made realms in light of triumph aside from Russians were engrossing domains while the domain was coming to fruition not at all like the British who as of now had a realm. Europeans depended on oceanic exchange though China stepped over from sea voyages. Qing line more tolerating of different societies than Europeans European economy dependent on slaves, China\'s economy was most probably not development in China.

1. Why did the European empires in the Americas have such an enormously greater impact on the
conquered people than did the Chinese, Mughal and Ottoman empires in Asia on the conquered
people?
Use specific examples from the reading to support your points, so that you are persuasive in
making your case.
Solution
Answer:-
Winds in the Atlantic sea were more unsurprising and consistent than those in the Indian Ocean.
The Indian Ocean had a vibrant market, so Chinese, Indian and Muslim members were not
intrigued by wandering out into the Americas. Europe had mapmaking, shipbuilding and route
procedures which empower control of the Atlantic. Europeans were roused because they knew
about their negligible position in the rich world and were resolved to get entrance. Europe was
recuperating from the Plague, and the best way to thrive was to obtain more land. European
dealers never again needed to depend on Muslim delegates. Want for grain, sugar, meat and fish.
Driven by competitions with contending states. Needed to spread Christendom. Minorities
needed another life.
Europeans were nearer to America's than the Asian states were. Winds in the Atlantic sea were
more unsurprising and consistent than those in the Indian Ocean. The Indian Ocean had a vibrant
market, so Chinese, Indian and Muslim members were not intrigued by wandering out into the
Americas. Europe had mapmaking, shipbuilding and route procedures which empower control of
the Atlantic. Europeans were roused because they knew about their negligible position in the rich
world and were resolved to get entrance. Europe was recuperating from the Plague, and the best
way to thrive was to obtain more land. European dealers never again needed to depend on
Muslim delegates. Want for grain, sugar, meat and fish. Driven by competitions with contending
states. Needed to spread Christendom. Minorities needed another life.
Infections that the local people groups of the Americas had no resistances to arrived in some
cases even before the European pioneers themselves, and either significantly debilitated or wiped
out their populaces. Another preferred standpoint that the Europeans had was their black powder
weapons (the local people groups had none at first), and their many tamed creatures that they
carried with them. There is additionally a characteristic rough streak in the European culture and
mentality, and Christianity is a zealous religion: both were helpers. Blended race offspring was
absorbed into culture instead of distinguishes as particular groups, for example, in Latin
America. Similarly made realms in light of triumph aside from Russians were engrossing

2. domains while the domain was coming to fruition not at all like the British who as of now had a
realm. Europeans depended on oceanic exchange though China stepped over from sea voyages.
Qing line more tolerating of different societies than Europeans
European economy dependent on slaves, China's economy was most probably not development
in China essential to shield realm from encompassing states, while European extension was to
pick up assets needed to change over others to Christianity while the Chinese were all the more
tolerating of different societies ,until the eighteenth century, English states stayed far less
unmistakable on the world stage english pilgrims originated from an all the more quickly
changing society numerous English pilgrims tried to escape parts of old European culture, as
opposed to reproducing it as Spanish and Portuguese homesteaders didenglish pilgrims needed
Spanish/Portuguese pioneer examples of sharp class progressive systems, vast provincial homes,
and ward workers because of their simple accessibility of land and untouchable status , english
pilgrims were increasingly various ,brits needed racial blending ,england had less enthusiasm for
spreading Christianity among the locals; the congregation and pioneer state were less associated
had a more prominent mass proficiency rate ,Anglian pilgrim states developed customs of
neighbourhood self-government more widely than in Latin America; less complicated
organisation.
Less racial blending in North America ;The states of subjugation somewhat differed.In North
America, bondage could be viewed as less cruel than the sugar manors in Brazil and the
Caribbean. Slaves in North America likewise wound up plainly self-imitating. In North America,
and a hint of African drop in a man influenced them " too dark," paying little respect to
whatever else was in their DNA. In Brazil, a man who was somewhat African and mostly non-
African was thought to be some other blended race classification. Likewise, shading was one of
the numerous criteria deciding one's class, and there was greater versatility on account of odds
of "going" in Brazil. In Brazil and the Caribbean, slaves will probably be sans set by there
proprietors and had a higher number of chances once they were liberated than in North America.