The document summarizes trends in the US housing market and economy after the 2008 crash. It notes that high unemployment and distressed real estate markets will continue dragging down the economy for several years. While home prices and ownership rates remain low, apartment construction is increasing to meet pent-up demand from younger renters. The recovery is also slowing home price declines and foreclosures in hardest hit states like California, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan and Florida. Overall, Americans will increasingly live as renters in urban areas of the South and West as the housing market and economy gradually improve.
Even if enough time has passed since a foreclosure, many lenders are loath to make loans to borrowers with any blemish on their credit history. The average credit score on purchase mortgage loans sold to Fannie Mae last year was close to 745. In a more typical housing market, like that prior to the housing bubble, the average score was closer to 715. This 30-point difference represents several
million potential homebuyers.
This is a big picture overview of the social and economic transformation of the USA in the last 20 years. Great wealth and prestige has been lost, the manufacturing and agriculture sectors have declined. The middle class has been decimated and great wealth inequality has been created. Government is under control of big corporations, especially in finance, and effective government agency has been lost.
arifanee.com is world's leading website on the hottest financial news, perspectives and behind the scenes stories. arifanees.com brings you insight and information to inspire and transform your paradigm by enriching your with the best of facts and the vision.
arifanees.com
Information-Inspiration-Transformation
Even if enough time has passed since a foreclosure, many lenders are loath to make loans to borrowers with any blemish on their credit history. The average credit score on purchase mortgage loans sold to Fannie Mae last year was close to 745. In a more typical housing market, like that prior to the housing bubble, the average score was closer to 715. This 30-point difference represents several
million potential homebuyers.
This is a big picture overview of the social and economic transformation of the USA in the last 20 years. Great wealth and prestige has been lost, the manufacturing and agriculture sectors have declined. The middle class has been decimated and great wealth inequality has been created. Government is under control of big corporations, especially in finance, and effective government agency has been lost.
arifanee.com is world's leading website on the hottest financial news, perspectives and behind the scenes stories. arifanees.com brings you insight and information to inspire and transform your paradigm by enriching your with the best of facts and the vision.
arifanees.com
Information-Inspiration-Transformation
Want to waste your time looking at photoshopped ladies' portraits, fake motivational phrases, and 6 million "Coaches", it's okay with me! Want to prepare and protect your family for the future, glance this IMPORTANT 2022 Economic Predictions
Bubble spotting - Subprime Mortgage crisis / Housing bubble 2007-2008Benjamin Van As
In the early to mid 2000s a housing bubble was created due to easy access to credit. The fall-out once investment bubble popped nearly brought the banking sector to its knees
This short presentation (part of a series on bubbles) explained what happened
Marc Faber Power Point presentation on his speech "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, When is the Next AIG to Fall?" at Mises Media, New York 24th of May, 2010.
Watch the lecture here: http://mises.org/media/5005
I have made this presentation to give insight of what really hapenned in 2008 when housing bubble bursted in 2008.
It was the greed of wall streets people and investors.
Please find attached our annual review with our compliments. This is a sample of the high quality content our subscribers receive each week. Take your free trial at bloombergbriefs.com
Creating Housing Opportunity
Creating a range of housing opportunities and choices is a major principle of Smart Growth, as stated by the Smart Growth Network, a coalition of more than 30 organizations including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Smart Growth America and the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®.
Want to waste your time looking at photoshopped ladies' portraits, fake motivational phrases, and 6 million "Coaches", it's okay with me! Want to prepare and protect your family for the future, glance this IMPORTANT 2022 Economic Predictions
Bubble spotting - Subprime Mortgage crisis / Housing bubble 2007-2008Benjamin Van As
In the early to mid 2000s a housing bubble was created due to easy access to credit. The fall-out once investment bubble popped nearly brought the banking sector to its knees
This short presentation (part of a series on bubbles) explained what happened
Marc Faber Power Point presentation on his speech "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, When is the Next AIG to Fall?" at Mises Media, New York 24th of May, 2010.
Watch the lecture here: http://mises.org/media/5005
I have made this presentation to give insight of what really hapenned in 2008 when housing bubble bursted in 2008.
It was the greed of wall streets people and investors.
Please find attached our annual review with our compliments. This is a sample of the high quality content our subscribers receive each week. Take your free trial at bloombergbriefs.com
Creating Housing Opportunity
Creating a range of housing opportunities and choices is a major principle of Smart Growth, as stated by the Smart Growth Network, a coalition of more than 30 organizations including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Smart Growth America and the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®.
20 THE NEW” HOUSING AND MORTGAGE MARKET SPRING 2016The .docxlorainedeserre
20 THE “NEW” HOUSING AND MORTGAGE MARKET SPRING 2016
The New Housing
and Mortgage Market
DOUGLAS DUNCAN
DOUGLAS DUNCAN
is chief economist and
a senior vice president
at Fannie Mae in
Washington, DC.
[email protected]
com
O
ne hears various individuals
ask whether the housing and
mortgage markets are back to
“normal,” or perhaps they con-
jecture that the markets are, in fact, back to
“normal.” Of course, that question implies an
understanding of what constitutes “normal.”
Others suggest there is a “new normal,”
which indicates a view that what was, is no
longer, and that the market has somehow
permanently changed. We will explore that
dichotomy of views in this brief article.
Our primary interests in this article
are in the production and delivery of and
investment in mortgage-related assets as well
as exploring what has changed and what the
future looks like in this market. Because the
number and volume of those assets are deriv-
ative of the underlying real estate, we will
also brief ly describe the U.S. demographic
profile that will drive demand for places to
live. People live in residences that they own
or rent and both are f inanced, so we will
comment on both types of property and what
brings people to live in one or the other.
Finally, we will offer a perspective on what
this means for mortgage asset volumes.
The next subject we will comment
upon is the organization of firms that make
mortgage loans to consumers in the primary
market. A number of post-crisis economic
and policy forces have been acting on these
f irms and changing the opportunities and
constraints they face. The environment has
altered the product set they offer. We offer
a view of how the demographic factors and
the implied potential mortgage-related asset
volumes might look going forward and how
they are likely to impact the number and type
of firms operating in the primary market.
The number and nature of firms oper-
ating in the secondary market have changed
significantly, as well. From a policy perspec-
tive, however, this is the area of least progress.
Irrespective of the lack of legislated change,
there are changes taking place in the sec-
ondary market under the direction of the
conservator.1 The primary market has seen
a shift of volume between traditional f irm
types, but the secondary market awaits poten-
tially greater structural change. This change
includes the mix of investors who ultimately
hold the mortgage assets as well as the types
of assets available to be held.
Much of the change to be discussed is
a result of the policy reaction to the housing
recession. The policy changes were both
monetary and fiscal. The drivers of change
also include what might be called the evo-
lutionary aspects of any market, perhaps
enabled in this case by technologic advance-
ment. We will not discuss the causes of the
recession but rather focus on the changes
wrought by the policy response to it. Not
all ...
20 THE NEW” HOUSING AND MORTGAGE MARKET SPRING 2016The .docxnovabroom
20 THE “NEW” HOUSING AND MORTGAGE MARKET SPRING 2016
The New Housing
and Mortgage Market
DOUGLAS DUNCAN
DOUGLAS DUNCAN
is chief economist and
a senior vice president
at Fannie Mae in
Washington, DC.
[email protected]
com
O
ne hears various individuals
ask whether the housing and
mortgage markets are back to
“normal,” or perhaps they con-
jecture that the markets are, in fact, back to
“normal.” Of course, that question implies an
understanding of what constitutes “normal.”
Others suggest there is a “new normal,”
which indicates a view that what was, is no
longer, and that the market has somehow
permanently changed. We will explore that
dichotomy of views in this brief article.
Our primary interests in this article
are in the production and delivery of and
investment in mortgage-related assets as well
as exploring what has changed and what the
future looks like in this market. Because the
number and volume of those assets are deriv-
ative of the underlying real estate, we will
also brief ly describe the U.S. demographic
profile that will drive demand for places to
live. People live in residences that they own
or rent and both are f inanced, so we will
comment on both types of property and what
brings people to live in one or the other.
Finally, we will offer a perspective on what
this means for mortgage asset volumes.
The next subject we will comment
upon is the organization of firms that make
mortgage loans to consumers in the primary
market. A number of post-crisis economic
and policy forces have been acting on these
f irms and changing the opportunities and
constraints they face. The environment has
altered the product set they offer. We offer
a view of how the demographic factors and
the implied potential mortgage-related asset
volumes might look going forward and how
they are likely to impact the number and type
of firms operating in the primary market.
The number and nature of firms oper-
ating in the secondary market have changed
significantly, as well. From a policy perspec-
tive, however, this is the area of least progress.
Irrespective of the lack of legislated change,
there are changes taking place in the sec-
ondary market under the direction of the
conservator.1 The primary market has seen
a shift of volume between traditional f irm
types, but the secondary market awaits poten-
tially greater structural change. This change
includes the mix of investors who ultimately
hold the mortgage assets as well as the types
of assets available to be held.
Much of the change to be discussed is
a result of the policy reaction to the housing
recession. The policy changes were both
monetary and fiscal. The drivers of change
also include what might be called the evo-
lutionary aspects of any market, perhaps
enabled in this case by technologic advance-
ment. We will not discuss the causes of the
recession but rather focus on the changes
wrought by the policy response to it. Not
all.
Please also find attached our Real Estate Supplement. In it you will read about how issuance of bonds backed by commercial properties is on track to beat last year's supply and yield premiums for bonds backed by commercial property loans have narrowed. Also, Jefferies CMBS veteran Lisa Pendergast says she expects CMBS spreads to narrow by year end, while Fannie Mae economists Douglas Duncan and Patrick Simmons argue that a slowdown in the growth of the labor force suggests more modest prospects for the demand for new housing and construction. Emile J. Brinkmann, the chief economist of the Mortgage Bankers Association of America, probes how state regulations will affect the pace of foreclosures and delinquencies. Nicolas Retsinas of Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing has some advice for lawmakers on GSE reform and Donald Trump offers a characteristically confident view that the recovery in real estate. If you have any comments or feedback for future real estate issues please contact arozens@bloomberg.net.
The purpose of this video is to provide an overview of the recent events and trends that have transpired in the residential housing environment, and to provide an overview of the home-price level for a select group of cities that make up the Adkins 60-City Home Price Index. This analysis is for the second quarter of 2015.
Fair Credit and Fair Housing in the Wake of the Subprime and Foreclosure Crisis
Where Will Americans Live
1. After the Crash:
How and Where Will Americans Live?
Gene Tenberg, Principal
gene@ten-mountain.com
2. The Ugliness of US Housing Trends
While the causes are complex, the results are as undisputable as they are appalling: $6
Trillion loss in home equity, 16%+ UNDER-employment, poor availability of new
mortgage debt.
2
3. Slowly Improving Economy -- Maybe
High unemployment and distressed residential and commercial real estate markets will
continue to serve as a drag on the US economy for the next several years.
The March 2011 report confirmed a
double-dip in home prices across much of
the nation. In addition to the National
3.2% Index, the 20-City Composite and 12 MSAs
— Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland,
Detroit, Las Vegas, Miami, Minneapolis,
New York, Phoenix, Portland (OR) and
Tampa — all hit their lowest levels as
2.7% measured by the current housing cycle.
The 20-City Composite’s March 2011 level
is the lowest since March 2003. This
cycle’s peak for the 20-City Composite
was in July 2006. The index indicates
home prices are now more than 33%
below that level. -- May31st, Case Shiller
20 City Composite
WSJ, 6/2/11
3
4. United States
Demographics
• We’re bigger at 308 million
• We’re more ethnically diverse
Population growth rate among the highest of
developed countries driven principally by
immigration. By 2050 1/5 Americana will be
an immigrant vs. 1/8 today.
• We’re older
Every state saw its population of individuals
45 and older grow during the past decade, as
the baby boomers age.
• We’re disproportionately
moving to the South
See graphic to the right from Pew Research
Center
4
6. Largest Housing Price Declines by State
Washington Michigan
Foreclosures: 3,613 (1 in 779 HUs) Foreclosures: 14,615 (1 in 311HUs)
Population: Amount / 2000:4,866,692 Population: Amount / 2000:9,295,297
Employment: Amount / Growth Employment: Amount / Growth
California
Foreclosures: 60,241 (1 in 223 HUs)
Population: 37,253,956/ 25.5%
Employment: Amount / Growth
Nevada
Foreclosures: 12,900 (1 in 88 HUs)
Population: Amount /
2000:1,201,833
Employment: Amount / Growth
Arizona
Foreclosures: 15,705 (1 in 175 HUs)
Population: Amount / 2000:3,665,228
Employment: Amount / Growth Georgia Florida
Foreclosures: 13,052(1 in 311 HUs) Foreclosures: 19,710(1 in 449HUs)
Colorado Population: 9,687,653/ 49.5% Population: 18,801,310/ 45.3%
Foreclosures: 4,791(1 in 452 HUs) Employment: Amount / Growth Employment: Amount / Growth
Population: 5,029,196/ 52.7%
Employment: Amount / Growth
Texas
Foreclosures: 11,018 (1 in 883 HUs)
Population: Amount / 2000:16,986,510
Employment: Amount / Growth
6
7. How and Where will Americans Live?
• 3.4 Million of pent-up residential
demand driven by housing crash and
slow recovery.
• Falling home prices and recent memory
of crash is discouraging many would be
owners to consider ownership.
• Extremely tough credit standards make
getting a mortgage MUCH more
difficult.
• Apartment developers have gotten the
hint: multifamily permits are up 22% vs.
down 21% for single family homes.
• Various industry sources are forecasting
residential rent growth at 5% for 2011.
7
8. About me
Mr. Tenberg served as one of the founding members of a real estate investment boutique
that controlled over $300 million in commercial transactions and delivered over $40 million
in profits to sponsors and institutional equity investors. Repositioning projects included
multiple portfolios of older rent-controlled inner city buildings and newer suburban
apartment complexes. The model leveraged 3rd party property management resources
while retaining origination, execution and asset management. For non-institutional investor
projects, the firm also provided property management services for its own account.
Extraordinary profits were driven by combining tax sheltered investment (principally via IRC
42 years old 1031) with short term holds, high leverage financing and tight operational controls.
Experience
• 8 years, real
estate investment In addition to nearly a decade of real estate experience, Mr. Tenberg brings over 10 years of
management operational leadership across technology intensive businesses. As a product manager at
• 3 years, civil several large enterprises like Avaya Communications and Silicon Graphics (SGI) he
engineering
• 5 years , product launched and transitioned multiple product lines. In one case he accelerated production
management migration in key strategic accounts by two years via specialized pricing, collaboration with
• 2 years , non- sales and direct negotiation with customers. In the early 90s, Mr. Tenberg moved back to
profit and
corporate Russia where he launched the first ruble denominated credit card. More recently he served
development as a CFO for an enterprise software company where he developed cost effective processes
Education to bring complex digital pen/paper products to dispersed medical professionals.
• MBA, Haas School
of Business, UC
Berkeley Mr. Tenberg was born in Kiev, Ukraine and has lived in the United States from an early age.
• BS, Civil He speaks fluent Russian and lives with his wife and two kids in Campbell, California.
Engineering, UC
Irvine
8