The document discusses when direct vs indirect conclusions should be used in advertising. It notes that if resistance is not expected, direct conclusions can be used, but if resistance is expected, especially for high-involvement products, indirect conclusions are better when the arguments are strong. It provides some examples of indirect ways to conclude, such as not stating the conclusion explicitly, using innuendos, allowing the conclusion to be "overheard," or treating the claim as already accepted. Research has found direct conclusions can lead people to reassert beliefs and resist persuasion, while indirect conclusions are better at overcoming resistance.