Government officials in Australia believed that removing Aboriginal children from their families and raising them according to white cultural practices was the best way to assimilate Aboriginal people between 1883 and 1969. The children were placed in institutions, churches, foster homes, or adopted by white families, cutting them off from their Aboriginal culture and often subjecting them to abuse. Many of the stolen generations suffered long-lasting emotional, spiritual, intellectual and psychological scars as a result of being separated from their families and culture.
This powerpoint presentation was created as an assignment for my graduate teacher training course. It is intended to make students aware of and understand about The Stolen Generation and to encourage them to reflect on this part of Australian history and how Aboriginal people have been affected by it. If there are any errors in style of referencing this is unintentional, and please contact me so I can make any necessary amendments.
This powerpoint presentation was created as an assignment for my graduate teacher training course. It is intended to make students aware of and understand about The Stolen Generation and to encourage them to reflect on this part of Australian history and how Aboriginal people have been affected by it. If there are any errors in style of referencing this is unintentional, and please contact me so I can make any necessary amendments.
A presentation to inform the viewer about the policies and effects of the mass removal of Indigenous Australian children from their families in the mid 1900's that created a generation of 'stolen' people.
What effect does your beliefs have on your life? Free or in bondageJan Oosthuizen
We are all prisoners of what we belief. The proof is in the fruit, the end result, the person I become, the things I do, and how my life effect those around me. In this presentation I take a glimpse of what people believe and how it effect their live.
The Shame of Child Labour – 2 - through the lens of Lewis Wickes Hine 1908-1924Yaryalitsa
In 1908 Hine left his teaching position at the progressive Ethical Culture School in New York to become a staff photographer for the National Child Labor Committee. The same year, he described his pictures in a reform journal as "graphic representation of conditions and methods of work, through pictures for exhibits, reports, folders, magazine and newspaper articles, and lantern slides." Over the next decade Hine made thousands of negatives-often undercover-of children working in mills, sweatshops, factories, and various street trades, such as the delivery boy pictured here. Through a steady accumulation of specific, idiosyncratic facts, the photographer hoped to reveal the larger, hidden patterns of exploitation upon which the American city was rapidly expanding. More important, his reports and slide lectures were not meant solely as tools for labor reform but as ways of triggering a more profound, empathetic response in the viewer, one that would cause him to reconsider his relationship to society.
NOTE:
There is a Number 2 as well: The Shame of Child Labour – 1 - through the lens of Lewis Wickes Hine 1908-1924
at the following URL in Slideshare:https://www.slideshare.net/yaryalitsa/the-shame-of-child-labour-1-through-the-lens-of-lewis-wickes-hine-19081924
1.1 Organization of Childrens Journeys Exploring Early Childhood.docxpaynetawnya
1.1 Organization of Children's Journeys: Exploring Early Childhood
You and I are grown up; we're not scared of things under the bed, are we? Unlike little children, we know there's nothing there. We can look all we want and nothing will eat us. You can't fool us just by projecting your voice. We recognize lies and we know that magic isn't real. Don't we?
Little children don't know these things. Part of growing up is learning them—learning what to expect, becoming familiar with what's out there, sorting fact from fancy, reality from wishes, tears from laughter.
Describing differences among infants and children, and explaining how these differences come about, is mostly what this text is about.
Children's Journeys is divided into three parts. Part One is a four-chapter introduction. Chapter 1 is, in a sense, about maps and guides. It explains what developmental psychology is and how psychologists study children. Chapter 2 introduces the mapmakers—those who developed the theories that guide our attempts to understand developmental change. Chapter 3 looks at the many paths the human journey makes possible: It deals with our genetic origins and with the influence of environmental context. Chapter 4 puts our subject, the developing child, on the road: It looks at systematic changes that occur from conception through birth and at important influences on the unborn child. Parts Two and Three look at physical, intellectual (cognitive), social, and emotional changes and processes during infancy1 (birth to age 2) and early childhood (ages 2 to 7 or 8).
1 Boldfaced terms are defined in the glossary at the end of the book.
Historical and Current Views of Childhood
Strange as it may seem to us, childhood as we generally understand it is not a universal phenomenon. What is universal is the fact that in all cultures infants are born at similar levels of biological immaturity. Also, patterns of biological maturation—such as learning to walk—are highly similar in all social groups.
But the experience of being a child can vary dramatically in different social contexts, as shown by studies in ethnography (studies of different cultures). For example, in the box Across Cultures: Mari: A Mayan Child: Liam, A North American Child, we see how Mari's life is unlike the lives of most children in the industrialized world. Much of the reason for this difference, explains Gaskins (1999), is that this Mayan society has different views of childhood. Among other things, these Mayans believe that adult work activities are so important that all childhood activities must be structured around them. Play is given little importance, and parents spend little time speaking with their children other than to admonish them or give them directions. This is in sharp contrast with the predominant North American view that emphasizes and caters to the child's wishes and interests, and that stresses the importance of play and of verbal and social interaction.
It is partly because the e ...
A presentation to inform the viewer about the policies and effects of the mass removal of Indigenous Australian children from their families in the mid 1900's that created a generation of 'stolen' people.
What effect does your beliefs have on your life? Free or in bondageJan Oosthuizen
We are all prisoners of what we belief. The proof is in the fruit, the end result, the person I become, the things I do, and how my life effect those around me. In this presentation I take a glimpse of what people believe and how it effect their live.
The Shame of Child Labour – 2 - through the lens of Lewis Wickes Hine 1908-1924Yaryalitsa
In 1908 Hine left his teaching position at the progressive Ethical Culture School in New York to become a staff photographer for the National Child Labor Committee. The same year, he described his pictures in a reform journal as "graphic representation of conditions and methods of work, through pictures for exhibits, reports, folders, magazine and newspaper articles, and lantern slides." Over the next decade Hine made thousands of negatives-often undercover-of children working in mills, sweatshops, factories, and various street trades, such as the delivery boy pictured here. Through a steady accumulation of specific, idiosyncratic facts, the photographer hoped to reveal the larger, hidden patterns of exploitation upon which the American city was rapidly expanding. More important, his reports and slide lectures were not meant solely as tools for labor reform but as ways of triggering a more profound, empathetic response in the viewer, one that would cause him to reconsider his relationship to society.
NOTE:
There is a Number 2 as well: The Shame of Child Labour – 1 - through the lens of Lewis Wickes Hine 1908-1924
at the following URL in Slideshare:https://www.slideshare.net/yaryalitsa/the-shame-of-child-labour-1-through-the-lens-of-lewis-wickes-hine-19081924
1.1 Organization of Childrens Journeys Exploring Early Childhood.docxpaynetawnya
1.1 Organization of Children's Journeys: Exploring Early Childhood
You and I are grown up; we're not scared of things under the bed, are we? Unlike little children, we know there's nothing there. We can look all we want and nothing will eat us. You can't fool us just by projecting your voice. We recognize lies and we know that magic isn't real. Don't we?
Little children don't know these things. Part of growing up is learning them—learning what to expect, becoming familiar with what's out there, sorting fact from fancy, reality from wishes, tears from laughter.
Describing differences among infants and children, and explaining how these differences come about, is mostly what this text is about.
Children's Journeys is divided into three parts. Part One is a four-chapter introduction. Chapter 1 is, in a sense, about maps and guides. It explains what developmental psychology is and how psychologists study children. Chapter 2 introduces the mapmakers—those who developed the theories that guide our attempts to understand developmental change. Chapter 3 looks at the many paths the human journey makes possible: It deals with our genetic origins and with the influence of environmental context. Chapter 4 puts our subject, the developing child, on the road: It looks at systematic changes that occur from conception through birth and at important influences on the unborn child. Parts Two and Three look at physical, intellectual (cognitive), social, and emotional changes and processes during infancy1 (birth to age 2) and early childhood (ages 2 to 7 or 8).
1 Boldfaced terms are defined in the glossary at the end of the book.
Historical and Current Views of Childhood
Strange as it may seem to us, childhood as we generally understand it is not a universal phenomenon. What is universal is the fact that in all cultures infants are born at similar levels of biological immaturity. Also, patterns of biological maturation—such as learning to walk—are highly similar in all social groups.
But the experience of being a child can vary dramatically in different social contexts, as shown by studies in ethnography (studies of different cultures). For example, in the box Across Cultures: Mari: A Mayan Child: Liam, A North American Child, we see how Mari's life is unlike the lives of most children in the industrialized world. Much of the reason for this difference, explains Gaskins (1999), is that this Mayan society has different views of childhood. Among other things, these Mayans believe that adult work activities are so important that all childhood activities must be structured around them. Play is given little importance, and parents spend little time speaking with their children other than to admonish them or give them directions. This is in sharp contrast with the predominant North American view that emphasizes and caters to the child's wishes and interests, and that stresses the importance of play and of verbal and social interaction.
It is partly because the e ...
1
PAPER 1 – EDUCATION AND NATIVE AMERICAN ASSIMILATION
PRIMARY SOURCES
In 1906, Helen Sekaquaptewa “awoke to find [her] camp surrounded
by troops.” She later recalled that a government official “called the men together,
ordering the women and children to remain in their separate family groups. He told the
men . . . that the government had reached the limit of its patience; that the children would
have to go to school.” Helen went on to relate how “All children of school age were lined
up to be registered and taken away to school. 82 children, including [Helen], were taken
to the schoolhouse ...with military escort.”
Helen Sekaquaptewa, a Hopi girl from Oraibi, was just one of many American Indian
children who, from the 1880s up to the 1930s, were forced by U.S. government agents to
attend school against the wishes of their parents and community.
A BATTLE FOR THE CHILDREN: American Indian Child Removal
in Arizona in the Era of Assimilation, Margaret D. Jacobs, University of Nevada, March 2004
A. VIEWPOINT OF THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, AND CONCERNED
CITIZENS:
Many people had different viewpoints on what to do with the “Indian problem,” though
most agreed that education was fundamental to solving this issue.
DOCUMENT1: George Grant, Presbyterian minister, 1872
As the Indian has no chance of existence except by conforming to civilized ways,
the sooner that the Government or Christian people awake to the necessity of
establishing schools among every tribe the better. Little can be done with the old,
and it may be two, three or more generations before the old habits of a people are
changed; but by always taking hold of the young, the work can be done.
https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/958/BowkerK1207.pdf?sequence=1
DOCUMENT 2: Report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs in 1903:
To educate the Indian in the ways of civilized life, therefore is to preserve him
from extinction, not as an Indian, but as a human being. As a separate entity, he
cannot exist [enclosed], as it were, in the body of this great nation.
The pressure for land must diminish his reservations to areas within which he can
utilize the acres allotted to him, so that the balance may become homes for the
white farmers who require them.
To educate the Indian is to prepare him for the abolishment of tribal relations, to
take his land in severalty, and in the seat of his brow and the toil of his hands to
carry out, as his white brother has done, a home for himself and family.
DOCUMENT 3: Excerpts from “Kill the Indian, and Save the Man,” 1892,
presented by Richard Henry Pratt.
Captain Richard Henry Pratt fought for the United States against Native
American Tribes including the Comanche, Cheyenne, Arapaho, and Kiowa. After
the U.S. won the “Indian Wars,” Pratt founded the Carlisle Indian Industrial
School in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. He presented his thoughts at the Nineteenth
Annual Conference of Chariti ...
2. Government officials believed that the best way to make Aboriginal behave like white people was to take their children away to raise them themselves. (Read,1981,p. 1)Figure 2 Milton Orkopoulos, MP .Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, May 2006
3. They thought that children’s minds were like a kind of blackboard on which the European secrets could be written. (Read,1981, p. 1)Figure 2 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/stolen_generations/to_nanna_epp_c1990/default.htm
4. The removal of Aboriginal children took place from 1883 to 1969 (Read, 1981) figure 4 http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/politics/stolen-generations.html
5. Aboriginal people had no choice but to follow the ‘white’ culture. (ENIAR,2010).figure 5 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/education_and_learning/winagual_to_listen_c2001/default.htm
6. Most of the stolen children were raised in a church. (ENIAR,2010). Figure 6 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/spirituality/group_of_people_listening_to_a_sermon_coranderrk_c1860c1865/default.htm
7. Some children were raised in state institutions. (ENIAR,2010). As showed below, Bomaderry children home, Cootamundra Aboriginal Girls' Home ……Figure 7 http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/politics/stolen-generations.html
8. Some were foster or adopted by white parents. (ENIAR,2010).Figure 8 Cootamundra Home, circa 1930
9. They were totally cut off from their Aboriginality. (ENIAR,2010).Figure 9 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/stolen_generations/my_babies_c1910c1911_/default.htm
10. The children would not be allow to go home and their parents received no encouragement to come to visit. (Read, 1981, p12). Figure 10 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/cummeragunja_images/the_people_of_cummeragunja_seated_outside_the_church_c1900/default.htm
11. Brothers and sisters might see each other every two or three years, often not at all. (Read, 1981, p.12)figure 11 Bomaderry Home, 1928
12. They were severely punished when caught talking their Aboriginal language.(ENIAR,2010). Figure 12 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/everyday_life/art_photos_videos/photos/coranderrk_cricketers_c1880/default.htm
13. Some children never learned anything traditional and received little or no education.(Creative Spririts,2010)Figure 13 Aboriginal Camp - Brewarrina, 1932
14. Instead the girls were trained to be domestic servants, the boys to be stockmen. (Creative Spririts,2010) Figure 14 Aboriginal Camp - Tingha, circa 1925
15. Many suffered physical, mental and sexual abuse. Food and living conditions were poor.(Creative Spririts,2010) Figure 15 http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/politics/stolen-generations.html
16. One man stated that he was kept locked up in a shed for several days and told to eat hay. (Read,1981, p.13) Figure 16 New Boys at Kinchela, 1932
17. Another in 1981 had scars on his feet, which he received forty years ago from frost bite, bringing in the cows, without shoes. (Read, 1981, p.13)Figure 17 Cane Gang, 1932
18. The girls as ‘slaves’ needed to scrub, wash, iron and sew or worked on vegetables gardens or dairy farms. (Read, 1981, p.13)Figure18 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/everyday_life/lake_tyers_c19501960/default.htm
19. The children were emotionally, spiritually, intellectually andpsychologically deprived, and these scars might never heal. (Read, 1981, p.13)Figure19 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/stolen_generations/framlingham_school_with_teacher_and_students/default.htm
20. Many believed that theirparents hadn’t been able to care for them or didn’t want them. (Read, 1981, p. 2)Figure 20 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/stolen_generations/to_nanna_epp_c1990/default.htm
21. The victims of separationthought it shameful to talk about their removal. (Read, 1981, p. 2)Figure 21 http://www.abc.net.au/missionvoices/layout/set/popup/media/cummeragunja_interviews/uncle_colin/coming_home/default.htm
22. References ENIAR, (2010). Retrieved from website: http://www.eniar.org/stolengenerations.html Creative Spirits , (2010) . Retrieved from website: http://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/politics/stolen-generations.html Read, P. (1981) . The Stolen Generations : The removal of Aboriginal children in New South Wales 1883 to 1969. Retrieved from website: http://www.slq.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/60651/Stolen_generations_-_Bibliography.pdf