Legal language is a dialect of standard American Business English. This is a presentation to explore some of the ways legal writing can be made more interesting and effective.
1 How to Brief a Case Prepared for the Legal S.docxhoney725342
1
How to Brief a Case
Prepared for the Legal Studies Program
American Public University System
December 2013
Introduction: A case brief is a concise summary of the significance of a case. It is a bit
like a “book report,” but with very special rules! It is a time-honored practice used throughout
the legal profession and law schools. As a teaching tool, the case brief forces the student to
identify and provide a written description of the most important aspects of a case. Legal
precedent, also known as Stare Decisis, is a doctrine which governs much of our legal process.
Under the doctrine, a prior court’s decision serves as “authority” for a subsequent court which
will address the same or similar issue. Therefore, understanding a court’s decision and the
rationale underlying it ---- that is, how the judges arrived at their decision ---- is essential to
the study of law. The case brief serves as a very useful vehicle by means of which to analyze
and understand judicial decisions.
A case brief is a tool by means of which to “capture” or outline the most important
aspects of a case. A case brief is not an invitation to re-write the opinion or to paste together
quotes from the court’s opinion. The brief should be written in your own words, based on your
understanding of the case. Of course, select quotes of the court’s words can be useful, if used
sparingly. A case brief should be concise; it should be no more than 1-2 pages. There are at least
several different methods or models for writing the case brief; these are based on personal
preferences. In the Legal Studies Program, however, the format described here will be used for
all of the case briefs which you are required to write in your courses. By using this uniform
format, you will gain familiarity with the case analysis and brief writing process.
Often, your textbooks will contain synopses of or abbreviated versions of courts’
opinions. When you want to understand a court’s decision, it is essential that you read the entire
opinion, rather than a mere summary. Therefore, the first step in the brief writing process is
always to thoroughly read the entire case. This includes reading any concurring and dissenting
opinions of members of the court. In this regard, be very sure that you are reading the entire
opinion! In some internet based sources, the Syllabus (headnotes/summary) of the opinion is
presented at one link, the majority opinion is presented at another link, etc. You need to read all
portions of the opinion as all of them are relevant to your analysis of the case. For example, if
there are strong dissenting opinions based on key legal points, this could predict what the court
might decide in the future on similar issues.
1. Case Name and Citation: As a header on the first page of your brief, you should state
the name of the case, identify each party’s role in the cas ...
Legal language is a dialect of standard American Business English. This is a presentation to explore some of the ways legal writing can be made more interesting and effective.
1 How to Brief a Case Prepared for the Legal S.docxhoney725342
1
How to Brief a Case
Prepared for the Legal Studies Program
American Public University System
December 2013
Introduction: A case brief is a concise summary of the significance of a case. It is a bit
like a “book report,” but with very special rules! It is a time-honored practice used throughout
the legal profession and law schools. As a teaching tool, the case brief forces the student to
identify and provide a written description of the most important aspects of a case. Legal
precedent, also known as Stare Decisis, is a doctrine which governs much of our legal process.
Under the doctrine, a prior court’s decision serves as “authority” for a subsequent court which
will address the same or similar issue. Therefore, understanding a court’s decision and the
rationale underlying it ---- that is, how the judges arrived at their decision ---- is essential to
the study of law. The case brief serves as a very useful vehicle by means of which to analyze
and understand judicial decisions.
A case brief is a tool by means of which to “capture” or outline the most important
aspects of a case. A case brief is not an invitation to re-write the opinion or to paste together
quotes from the court’s opinion. The brief should be written in your own words, based on your
understanding of the case. Of course, select quotes of the court’s words can be useful, if used
sparingly. A case brief should be concise; it should be no more than 1-2 pages. There are at least
several different methods or models for writing the case brief; these are based on personal
preferences. In the Legal Studies Program, however, the format described here will be used for
all of the case briefs which you are required to write in your courses. By using this uniform
format, you will gain familiarity with the case analysis and brief writing process.
Often, your textbooks will contain synopses of or abbreviated versions of courts’
opinions. When you want to understand a court’s decision, it is essential that you read the entire
opinion, rather than a mere summary. Therefore, the first step in the brief writing process is
always to thoroughly read the entire case. This includes reading any concurring and dissenting
opinions of members of the court. In this regard, be very sure that you are reading the entire
opinion! In some internet based sources, the Syllabus (headnotes/summary) of the opinion is
presented at one link, the majority opinion is presented at another link, etc. You need to read all
portions of the opinion as all of them are relevant to your analysis of the case. For example, if
there are strong dissenting opinions based on key legal points, this could predict what the court
might decide in the future on similar issues.
1. Case Name and Citation: As a header on the first page of your brief, you should state
the name of the case, identify each party’s role in the cas ...
Judicial OpinionsOverview After the simulation, justices writ.docxSusanaFurman449
Judicial Opinions
Overview: After the simulation, justices write judicial opinions in reaction to the oral argument, merits briefs, conference, and draft opinions as well as the facts of the case, Constitution, and case law. Justices circulate drafts so they know how their colleagues plan to rule and why, and so they can respond to one another in their final judicial opinion draft.
Instructions: You are a Supreme Court justice preparing an opinion for announcement. Read the case materials: case hypothetical, merits briefs, and judicial opinion drafts of your colleagues, and review your notes from oral argument and conference. Write a majority opinion resolving the major legal question in light of the facts of the case, Constitution, and case law, as well as all case materials: merits briefs, oral argument, and the views of your colleagues (in conference and draft opinions). Opinions must support an argument, refute counterarguments, and respond to attorneys (oral argument and/or merits briefs), and fellow justices (conference and/or draft opinions).
Opinions should contain the following five elements, in the following order:
1. an introductory statement of the nature, procedural posture, and prior result of the case;
2. a statement of the issues to be decided;
3. a statement of the material facts;
4. a discussion of the governing legal principles and resolution of the issues; and
5. the disposition and necessary instructions.
Each of these is developed further below.
Assessment: Complete opinions must support an argument, refute counterarguments, and respond to attorneys (oral argument and/or merits briefs), and fellow justices (conference and/or draft opinions). Strong opinions will be well organized, logically argued, and well supported through reference to and explanation of Supreme Court decisions and legal principles. Assessment rests on how well you make use of, identify, and explain relevant course material. It also rests on staying in character and not diverging from your justice’s political ideology and/or judicial philosophy.
Introduction
The purpose of the Introduction is to orient the reader to the case. It should state briefly what the case is about, the legal subject matter, and the result. It may also cover some or all of the following:
1. The parties: The parties should be identified, if not in the Introduction, then early in the opinion, preferably by name, and names should be used consistently throughout. (The use of legal descriptions, such as “appellant” and “appellee,” tends to be confusing, especially in multi-party cases.)
2. The procedural and jurisdictional status: relevant prior proceedings, and how the case got before the court should be outlined.
Statement of issues
The statement of issues is the cornerstone of the opinion; how the issues are formulated determines which facts are material and what legal principles govern. Judges should not be bound by the attorneys’.
Head note, a term in the circle of courts and cases, is a summary of the case judgment usually written by the third party like, editors or experts on law, before the judgment description so that it gives the overview of the judgment published. Often it is not mandatory but proves to be helpful to get a glimpse of the court law. The headnote does serve as legal requirements.
With a panel of writers who have their expertise in legal writing and making inferences, develop this headnote of every case. In case of the trial shifted to another court in due course, this headnote provides the required glimpse of all the proceedings of the trial in question covering all the legal aspects. It is essential to know what was the occurring and the state of the case as on date. Due consideration while drafting the headnote to not change the nature of the trial is essential.
Email: info@lexhawk.com
Why Brief a Case Cases are written by lawyers for lawyers.docxalanfhall8953
Why Brief a Case?
Cases are written by lawyers for lawyers. Consequently, there's a structure and
method unlike any other type of writing that you've read. Once you know the
structure and method, you'll be able to breeze through cases quickly. When the
writing is brilliant - for example, cases written by Holmes, Cardozo and Learned
Hand - the cases can be as enjoyable as a good piece of fiction. There's drama,
conflict, resolution, humor and pathos. Other times, the writing is very non-linear
and leaves out important elements, such as the facts of a case.
Briefing is the first step in learning how to outline. The brief should distill a case
down to its elements, which allows you to immediately understand the principal
legal issues at a glance. When you are under the pressure of the harsh glare of an
aggressive professor, you want to be able to take one look at the brief and know the
answer.
Case briefs are an important tool, but it's also important to keep briefs in perspective.
Many students labor intensively over case briefs by creating forms and making sure
that the wording is perfect. A brief is just a tool that helps you accomplish three
things - build comprehension, answer questions in class and complete an outline.
You'll never be graded on a brief. If you're spending time on stylistic niceties that
don't accomplish one of the three goals then you're not spending time wisely.
Three Reasons to Brief a Case
1. Rewriting the material leads to better comprehension.
2. Creates a cheat sheet for questions in class.
3. Serves as a starting point for outlining.
Briefing is a phase that you eventually grow out of. After the first semester, students
tend to brief a lot less. Their briefs may just end up being therule of law or they will
write notes in the margin of the casebook, which highlight the different elements.
While some complex cases in your second and third years demand briefing, you will
probably pick up the skills you need in your first year to analyze cases on the fly.
http://lawnerds.com/guide/outlining.html#WhyOutline?
http://lawnerds.com/guide/class.html#TheFirstDay
http://lawnerds.com/guide/outlining.html#WhyOutline?
http://lawnerds.com/guide/irac.html#Rule
How to Brief a Case
Briefs should be a one-page summary of the case. Structure the summary according
to the elements listed below. The structure adheres to the types of questions the
professor asks in class and to the information you'll need for outlining. Not every
case can be summed up in one page, but it's a good discipline to attempt to condense
the material.
THE ELEMENTS OF BRIEFING
Procedural History
Legal Issue
Facts of Case
Statement of Rule
Policy
Dicta
Reasoning
Holding
Concurrence
Dissents
You might consider creating a standard form using a word processor, then fill in the
blanks as you read the case. You may want to modify the form as you go along
through the semester. Professor.
Brief Texas v. Johnson located on page 166 of your text. Follow.docxjackiewalcutt
Brief
Texas v. Johnson
located on page 166 of your text. Follow the briefing format explained on pages 13-16: citation, facts, rule, issue, holding, reasoning, and criticism.
Recall that the facts should include any fact that you think affected the court's decision as well as the main procedural facts. The rule should be the rule as it existed prior to this decision.
The issue statement should contain two main components: the rule (label plus definition) and specific facts. After reading the issue, the reader should know exactly why each side thought it had a chance of convincing the court that it should win.
The holding should be very specific so that your reader will know the limits that the court placed on its decision.
The reasoning section should be as complete as possible so that your reader can fully understand why the court decided as it did.
Finally, the criticism section should include a short accounting of what the dissent had to say. Your criticism section should also point out any logical failings or limitations that you found in the majority opinion's thinking. Make sure anyone reading your criticism section can tell when you are giving your own criticism versus when you are simply reporting on what the dissent had to say.
The project is due as follows:
Part A -- Citation, Facts, and Rule - Week 1
You only have do the citation, facts, and rule!!!!!!!
The following pages are the e-text steps you'll hav e to follow to create the case brief.
page 13
(3) Briefing court opinions
The word
brief
has several meanings in the legal field. When we refer to briefing a case or to
case briefs
, we are referring to a written summary of a court opinion. This is to be contrasted with an appellate brief, which is a formal written argument to an appellate court, in which a lawyer argues why that court should affirm or reverse a lower court's decision.
(a) Reasons for briefing cases
Briefing court opinions serves two purposes. First, and most important, it makes you read the case thoroughly. You have to go back and dig out the essentials, organize them, and state them in your own words. This is necessary for an adequate understanding of the court opinion. Second, it is a form of note taking that provides a condensed record of the most important information about the case you briefed. You can use these case briefs to refresh your memory when preparing for class or studying for exams.
(b) Format of a case brief
While most case briefs share many common features, there is no single format that is universally accepted within the legal community. Indeed, there are almost as many different briefing styles as there are attorneys writing briefs. What we present here is an approach that we think will help you organize your thoughts and understand the opinion.
The case briefing method described here breaks the case down into the following elements: (i) case citation, (ii) facts — both procedural and substantive, (iii) r.
Sheet1costagerisksatisfaction13316836611404372920173546484015338815221451077438147038110631742264933169586943128738296612185682471009664420137877159429478739515900749161603067777160377827811163727991597478668150557575818636846839063615921824765323142167266814881751617133808701366882241514276266108346629310321709711390681114187597796812974691077171868174117262634381703076759156556846166627933210036626501647169104516269795231771465816151796873229408901096160606363515980784131226568355142548053155947486013452738121209567693148177579218176685351484769911462474163184718387613785837771338070103314227735841382473161191581326183846243165757910541545364168135276314516285645171530776771145147578112579682814772742211512263511547375135157198268415123768731609178738148746714014679742881338074269176308264816704804651342870842121018342613571712211311770588121837767141818232515484765291447874219160577891315577635911458874645167398089015358821019139136541514125844741288069813157206341616391778411523082948159726751616008786101570267361130498794810734827531868386856182037859614154612514263731082141637295912866693591234968170144727343611520662441492775538121366714913981701011114017337712852694961374971631138616749614603749171433662821333570453144007366215754779111660063658127586984147978265614520742881295969957176178188912974699251498175319159897878614886751691133165768154577712414366736611408372483142477317715539824831519074742287648662810596774791384471985146366354414887825991423273296145086244412702816881619578412137937710291218467676157967428812607682411336883951478776611626761995179248210971252481291164377982314610698691522776673151977591213945726811346170844135886338014413749441560077104213969721040159037477013549712191569477252171276747515257761371637067678145426282716317791083168468075114063728631390471856129887084716284799511512876150111646689616788701090
Greetings students,
I found a description online that may help you understand how to complete a
case brief. Please read carefully because you will be completing at least 2 case
briefs this semester.
Student briefs
These can be extensive or short, depending on the depth of analysis required and the
demands of the instructor. A comprehensive brief includes the following elements:
1. Title and Citation
2. Facts of the Case
3. Issues
4. Decisions (Holdings)
5. Reasoning (Rationale)
6. Separate Opinions
7. Analysis
1. Title and Citation
The title of the case shows who is opposing whom. The name of the person who
initiated legal action in that particular court will always appear first. Since the losers
often appeal to a higher court, this can get confusing. The first section of this guide
shows you how to identify the players without a scorecard.
The citation tells how to locate the reporter of the case in the appropriate case reporter.
If you know only the title of the case, the citation to it can be found using the case
digest covering that court, through Goog.
Judicial OpinionsOverview After the simulation, justices writ.docxSusanaFurman449
Judicial Opinions
Overview: After the simulation, justices write judicial opinions in reaction to the oral argument, merits briefs, conference, and draft opinions as well as the facts of the case, Constitution, and case law. Justices circulate drafts so they know how their colleagues plan to rule and why, and so they can respond to one another in their final judicial opinion draft.
Instructions: You are a Supreme Court justice preparing an opinion for announcement. Read the case materials: case hypothetical, merits briefs, and judicial opinion drafts of your colleagues, and review your notes from oral argument and conference. Write a majority opinion resolving the major legal question in light of the facts of the case, Constitution, and case law, as well as all case materials: merits briefs, oral argument, and the views of your colleagues (in conference and draft opinions). Opinions must support an argument, refute counterarguments, and respond to attorneys (oral argument and/or merits briefs), and fellow justices (conference and/or draft opinions).
Opinions should contain the following five elements, in the following order:
1. an introductory statement of the nature, procedural posture, and prior result of the case;
2. a statement of the issues to be decided;
3. a statement of the material facts;
4. a discussion of the governing legal principles and resolution of the issues; and
5. the disposition and necessary instructions.
Each of these is developed further below.
Assessment: Complete opinions must support an argument, refute counterarguments, and respond to attorneys (oral argument and/or merits briefs), and fellow justices (conference and/or draft opinions). Strong opinions will be well organized, logically argued, and well supported through reference to and explanation of Supreme Court decisions and legal principles. Assessment rests on how well you make use of, identify, and explain relevant course material. It also rests on staying in character and not diverging from your justice’s political ideology and/or judicial philosophy.
Introduction
The purpose of the Introduction is to orient the reader to the case. It should state briefly what the case is about, the legal subject matter, and the result. It may also cover some or all of the following:
1. The parties: The parties should be identified, if not in the Introduction, then early in the opinion, preferably by name, and names should be used consistently throughout. (The use of legal descriptions, such as “appellant” and “appellee,” tends to be confusing, especially in multi-party cases.)
2. The procedural and jurisdictional status: relevant prior proceedings, and how the case got before the court should be outlined.
Statement of issues
The statement of issues is the cornerstone of the opinion; how the issues are formulated determines which facts are material and what legal principles govern. Judges should not be bound by the attorneys’.
Head note, a term in the circle of courts and cases, is a summary of the case judgment usually written by the third party like, editors or experts on law, before the judgment description so that it gives the overview of the judgment published. Often it is not mandatory but proves to be helpful to get a glimpse of the court law. The headnote does serve as legal requirements.
With a panel of writers who have their expertise in legal writing and making inferences, develop this headnote of every case. In case of the trial shifted to another court in due course, this headnote provides the required glimpse of all the proceedings of the trial in question covering all the legal aspects. It is essential to know what was the occurring and the state of the case as on date. Due consideration while drafting the headnote to not change the nature of the trial is essential.
Email: info@lexhawk.com
Why Brief a Case Cases are written by lawyers for lawyers.docxalanfhall8953
Why Brief a Case?
Cases are written by lawyers for lawyers. Consequently, there's a structure and
method unlike any other type of writing that you've read. Once you know the
structure and method, you'll be able to breeze through cases quickly. When the
writing is brilliant - for example, cases written by Holmes, Cardozo and Learned
Hand - the cases can be as enjoyable as a good piece of fiction. There's drama,
conflict, resolution, humor and pathos. Other times, the writing is very non-linear
and leaves out important elements, such as the facts of a case.
Briefing is the first step in learning how to outline. The brief should distill a case
down to its elements, which allows you to immediately understand the principal
legal issues at a glance. When you are under the pressure of the harsh glare of an
aggressive professor, you want to be able to take one look at the brief and know the
answer.
Case briefs are an important tool, but it's also important to keep briefs in perspective.
Many students labor intensively over case briefs by creating forms and making sure
that the wording is perfect. A brief is just a tool that helps you accomplish three
things - build comprehension, answer questions in class and complete an outline.
You'll never be graded on a brief. If you're spending time on stylistic niceties that
don't accomplish one of the three goals then you're not spending time wisely.
Three Reasons to Brief a Case
1. Rewriting the material leads to better comprehension.
2. Creates a cheat sheet for questions in class.
3. Serves as a starting point for outlining.
Briefing is a phase that you eventually grow out of. After the first semester, students
tend to brief a lot less. Their briefs may just end up being therule of law or they will
write notes in the margin of the casebook, which highlight the different elements.
While some complex cases in your second and third years demand briefing, you will
probably pick up the skills you need in your first year to analyze cases on the fly.
http://lawnerds.com/guide/outlining.html#WhyOutline?
http://lawnerds.com/guide/class.html#TheFirstDay
http://lawnerds.com/guide/outlining.html#WhyOutline?
http://lawnerds.com/guide/irac.html#Rule
How to Brief a Case
Briefs should be a one-page summary of the case. Structure the summary according
to the elements listed below. The structure adheres to the types of questions the
professor asks in class and to the information you'll need for outlining. Not every
case can be summed up in one page, but it's a good discipline to attempt to condense
the material.
THE ELEMENTS OF BRIEFING
Procedural History
Legal Issue
Facts of Case
Statement of Rule
Policy
Dicta
Reasoning
Holding
Concurrence
Dissents
You might consider creating a standard form using a word processor, then fill in the
blanks as you read the case. You may want to modify the form as you go along
through the semester. Professor.
Brief Texas v. Johnson located on page 166 of your text. Follow.docxjackiewalcutt
Brief
Texas v. Johnson
located on page 166 of your text. Follow the briefing format explained on pages 13-16: citation, facts, rule, issue, holding, reasoning, and criticism.
Recall that the facts should include any fact that you think affected the court's decision as well as the main procedural facts. The rule should be the rule as it existed prior to this decision.
The issue statement should contain two main components: the rule (label plus definition) and specific facts. After reading the issue, the reader should know exactly why each side thought it had a chance of convincing the court that it should win.
The holding should be very specific so that your reader will know the limits that the court placed on its decision.
The reasoning section should be as complete as possible so that your reader can fully understand why the court decided as it did.
Finally, the criticism section should include a short accounting of what the dissent had to say. Your criticism section should also point out any logical failings or limitations that you found in the majority opinion's thinking. Make sure anyone reading your criticism section can tell when you are giving your own criticism versus when you are simply reporting on what the dissent had to say.
The project is due as follows:
Part A -- Citation, Facts, and Rule - Week 1
You only have do the citation, facts, and rule!!!!!!!
The following pages are the e-text steps you'll hav e to follow to create the case brief.
page 13
(3) Briefing court opinions
The word
brief
has several meanings in the legal field. When we refer to briefing a case or to
case briefs
, we are referring to a written summary of a court opinion. This is to be contrasted with an appellate brief, which is a formal written argument to an appellate court, in which a lawyer argues why that court should affirm or reverse a lower court's decision.
(a) Reasons for briefing cases
Briefing court opinions serves two purposes. First, and most important, it makes you read the case thoroughly. You have to go back and dig out the essentials, organize them, and state them in your own words. This is necessary for an adequate understanding of the court opinion. Second, it is a form of note taking that provides a condensed record of the most important information about the case you briefed. You can use these case briefs to refresh your memory when preparing for class or studying for exams.
(b) Format of a case brief
While most case briefs share many common features, there is no single format that is universally accepted within the legal community. Indeed, there are almost as many different briefing styles as there are attorneys writing briefs. What we present here is an approach that we think will help you organize your thoughts and understand the opinion.
The case briefing method described here breaks the case down into the following elements: (i) case citation, (ii) facts — both procedural and substantive, (iii) r.
Sheet1costagerisksatisfaction13316836611404372920173546484015338815221451077438147038110631742264933169586943128738296612185682471009664420137877159429478739515900749161603067777160377827811163727991597478668150557575818636846839063615921824765323142167266814881751617133808701366882241514276266108346629310321709711390681114187597796812974691077171868174117262634381703076759156556846166627933210036626501647169104516269795231771465816151796873229408901096160606363515980784131226568355142548053155947486013452738121209567693148177579218176685351484769911462474163184718387613785837771338070103314227735841382473161191581326183846243165757910541545364168135276314516285645171530776771145147578112579682814772742211512263511547375135157198268415123768731609178738148746714014679742881338074269176308264816704804651342870842121018342613571712211311770588121837767141818232515484765291447874219160577891315577635911458874645167398089015358821019139136541514125844741288069813157206341616391778411523082948159726751616008786101570267361130498794810734827531868386856182037859614154612514263731082141637295912866693591234968170144727343611520662441492775538121366714913981701011114017337712852694961374971631138616749614603749171433662821333570453144007366215754779111660063658127586984147978265614520742881295969957176178188912974699251498175319159897878614886751691133165768154577712414366736611408372483142477317715539824831519074742287648662810596774791384471985146366354414887825991423273296145086244412702816881619578412137937710291218467676157967428812607682411336883951478776611626761995179248210971252481291164377982314610698691522776673151977591213945726811346170844135886338014413749441560077104213969721040159037477013549712191569477252171276747515257761371637067678145426282716317791083168468075114063728631390471856129887084716284799511512876150111646689616788701090
Greetings students,
I found a description online that may help you understand how to complete a
case brief. Please read carefully because you will be completing at least 2 case
briefs this semester.
Student briefs
These can be extensive or short, depending on the depth of analysis required and the
demands of the instructor. A comprehensive brief includes the following elements:
1. Title and Citation
2. Facts of the Case
3. Issues
4. Decisions (Holdings)
5. Reasoning (Rationale)
6. Separate Opinions
7. Analysis
1. Title and Citation
The title of the case shows who is opposing whom. The name of the person who
initiated legal action in that particular court will always appear first. Since the losers
often appeal to a higher court, this can get confusing. The first section of this guide
shows you how to identify the players without a scorecard.
The citation tells how to locate the reporter of the case in the appropriate case reporter.
If you know only the title of the case, the citation to it can be found using the case
digest covering that court, through Goog.
MKT 420 SEO Week 4 Steps for performing an SEO Audit including SERP page analysis, content analysis, review of code, measuring trustworthiness, evaluating potential keywords and content organization.
High Impact Strategies for Enhancing Student Engagement Online and Hybrid Ma...Michael Germano
Strategies for impacting student success and satisfaction in online and hybrid classes via increasing social presence in digital learning environments.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical FuturesBhaskar Mitra
The field of Information retrieval (IR) is currently undergoing a transformative shift, at least partly due to the emerging applications of generative AI to information access. In this talk, we will deliberate on the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. We will argue that there is both a critical necessity and an exciting opportunity for the IR community to re-center our research agendas on societal needs while dismantling the artificial separation between the work on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in IR and the rest of IR research. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as democratic theory and critical theory, and should be co-developed with social science scholars, legal scholars, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.