Implementing the Researcher Development FrameworkEmma Gillaspy
A joint Vitae NW & YNE Hub good practice workshop held in Manchester on 26/05/2011. Slides are from the introductory session. More information about this event can be found at www.vitae.ac.uk/nwgp11
Dr. Jezie A. Acorda, editor-in-chief of the Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, presented the challenges for publishers in the management of academic journals during C&E's Academic Publishing Forum on January 26, 2011 at C&E Information and Resource Center, Quezon City.
Panel discussion: Why ORCID? Perspectives from the university community
Moderator: Barbara Allen, Executive Director, Committee on Institutional Cooperation
Presenters:
Karen Butler-Purry, Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies, Texas A&M University
Keith Hazelton, Senior IT Architect the University of Wisconsin-Madison/Chair of Internet2 MACE-Dir working group
Neil Jacobs, Programme Director, Digital Infrastructure, Jisc
Yan Shuai, President, Society of China University Journals (CUJS)
AAU executive vice president John Vaughn speaks about the value of ORCID iDs to the university community at the 10/30/13 ORCID Outreach Meeting in Washington, DC.
Implementing the Researcher Development FrameworkEmma Gillaspy
A joint Vitae NW & YNE Hub good practice workshop held in Manchester on 26/05/2011. Slides are from the introductory session. More information about this event can be found at www.vitae.ac.uk/nwgp11
Dr. Jezie A. Acorda, editor-in-chief of the Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, presented the challenges for publishers in the management of academic journals during C&E's Academic Publishing Forum on January 26, 2011 at C&E Information and Resource Center, Quezon City.
Panel discussion: Why ORCID? Perspectives from the university community
Moderator: Barbara Allen, Executive Director, Committee on Institutional Cooperation
Presenters:
Karen Butler-Purry, Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies, Texas A&M University
Keith Hazelton, Senior IT Architect the University of Wisconsin-Madison/Chair of Internet2 MACE-Dir working group
Neil Jacobs, Programme Director, Digital Infrastructure, Jisc
Yan Shuai, President, Society of China University Journals (CUJS)
AAU executive vice president John Vaughn speaks about the value of ORCID iDs to the university community at the 10/30/13 ORCID Outreach Meeting in Washington, DC.
From the ORCID Outreach Meeting, May 21-22, 2014, Chicago Illinois. https://orcid.org/content/orcid-outreach-meeting-and-codefest-may-2014
ORCID integration into researcher information systems
The ORCID identifier has been integrated into numerous researcher information system platforms available to the research community, providing the opportunity for improved data through disambiguation and reducing the time-consuming process of maintaining up-to-date records for both individuals and organizations. This session will feature a discussion of integration points, policy issues, data flow between systems, researcher participation, discovered opportunities, improved metrics and reporting, and demonstrations by universities and vendors.
Moderator: David Baker, Executive Director, CASRAI
Presenters:
Urban Andersson, IT Librarian, Chalmers University of Technology
Michael Habib, Senior Product Manager-Scopus, Elsevier
Julia Hawks, VP, North America, Symplectic
Andrew Johnson, Assistant Professor and Research Data Librarian, University of Colorado Boulder (CU-Boulder)
Patricia Brennan, Thomson Reuters
Christopher Shanahan, Assistant Professor and Faculty Lead, BU Profiles, Boston University School of Medicine
Simeon Warner, Research Associate, Cornell University
Should funders require applicants to submit their ORCID?ORCID, Inc
Webinar presentation to Health Research Alliance (HRA) members by Ed Clayton, Senior Director, Strategic Funding and Grants Administration, Autism Speaks
7 May 2014
From the ORCID Outreach Meeting, May 21-22, 2014, held in Chicago, Illinois, USA. https://orcid.org/content/orcid-outreach-meeting-and-codefest-may-2014
Best practices in the creation of ORCID identifiers for faculty, staff, and students: technical integration
Research organizations are creating ORCID iDs and integrating them into a variety of systems, from personnel databases, to directories, repositories, and university presses. In this session, organizations will share information and strategies on technical aspects of working with ORCID APIs, strategies for modifying internal systems to capture and store ORCID iDs, and interactions with other identifiers.
Moderator: Simeon Warner, Research Associate, Cornell University
Presenters:
Urban Andersson, IT Librarian, Chalmers University of Technology
Peter Flynn, Lead Developer, Boston University
James Creel, Senior Lead Software Applications Developer, Texas A&M University
The adoption of ORCID identifiers by funding organizationsORCID, Inc
Walter Schaffer, NIH
Overview of the challenges funding organizations face in collecting information about early career researchers. Learn more about how the U.S. NIH has integrated the ORCID identifier into SciENv, as well as future plans, including the adoption of SciENcv by NSF in 2014.
From Webinar 4/23/14, https://orcid.org/content/identification-early-career-researchers-how-universities-and-funding-organizations-are-using
From the ORCID Outreach Meeting, May 21-22, 2014, Chicago Illinois. https://orcid.org/content/orcid-outreach-meeting-and-codefest-may-2014
ORCID integration into researcher information systems
The ORCID identifier has been integrated into numerous researcher information system platforms available to the research community, providing the opportunity for improved data through disambiguation and reducing the time-consuming process of maintaining up-to-date records for both individuals and organizations. This session will feature a discussion of integration points, policy issues, data flow between systems, researcher participation, discovered opportunities, improved metrics and reporting, and demonstrations by universities and vendors.
Moderator: David Baker, Executive Director, CASRAI
Presenters:
Urban Andersson, IT Librarian, Chalmers University of Technology
Michael Habib, Senior Product Manager-Scopus, Elsevier
Julia Hawks, VP, North America, Symplectic
Andrew Johnson, Assistant Professor and Research Data Librarian, University of Colorado Boulder (CU-Boulder)
Patricia Brennan, Thomson Reuters
Christopher Shanahan, Assistant Professor and Faculty Lead, BU Profiles, Boston University School of Medicine
Simeon Warner, Research Associate, Cornell University
Should funders require applicants to submit their ORCID?ORCID, Inc
Webinar presentation to Health Research Alliance (HRA) members by Ed Clayton, Senior Director, Strategic Funding and Grants Administration, Autism Speaks
7 May 2014
From the ORCID Outreach Meeting, May 21-22, 2014, held in Chicago, Illinois, USA. https://orcid.org/content/orcid-outreach-meeting-and-codefest-may-2014
Best practices in the creation of ORCID identifiers for faculty, staff, and students: technical integration
Research organizations are creating ORCID iDs and integrating them into a variety of systems, from personnel databases, to directories, repositories, and university presses. In this session, organizations will share information and strategies on technical aspects of working with ORCID APIs, strategies for modifying internal systems to capture and store ORCID iDs, and interactions with other identifiers.
Moderator: Simeon Warner, Research Associate, Cornell University
Presenters:
Urban Andersson, IT Librarian, Chalmers University of Technology
Peter Flynn, Lead Developer, Boston University
James Creel, Senior Lead Software Applications Developer, Texas A&M University
The adoption of ORCID identifiers by funding organizationsORCID, Inc
Walter Schaffer, NIH
Overview of the challenges funding organizations face in collecting information about early career researchers. Learn more about how the U.S. NIH has integrated the ORCID identifier into SciENv, as well as future plans, including the adoption of SciENcv by NSF in 2014.
From Webinar 4/23/14, https://orcid.org/content/identification-early-career-researchers-how-universities-and-funding-organizations-are-using
RDA implementation at the British Library / Thurstan Young (British Library)CILIP MDG
On 23rd May 2023, the RDA Board announced that the original RDA Toolkit will be removed in May 2027. All RDA users will need to be prepared for transition to the official RDA Toolkit before then. As previously announced, a Countdown Clock will start running in May 2026, a year before the sunset date.
This paper will provide an update on the British Library’s plans for implementation of the new RDA Toolkit, following completion of the RDA Toolkit Restructure and Redesign (3R) project. It will provide an overview of the timeline and scope for implementation as well as describing the training and documentation underpinning the implementation and the support available to other institutions for their implementation.
Paper presented at the Metadata & Discovery Group Conference & RDA Day (6th - 8th Sept 2023 at IET Austin Court, Birmingham)
2021 04 Introduction to FAIRsharing - cinecaAllyson Lister
Part of the The “How FAIR are you” webinar series and hackathon, which aim at increasing and facilitating the uptake of FAIR approaches into software, training materials and cohort data, to facilitate responsible and ethical data and resource sharing and implementation of federated applications for data analysis.
More information at
* the webinar page: https://www.cineca-project.eu/news-events-all/how-fair-are-you-hackathon
* the recording of the talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdGZOynyuGo
RDA development and implementation overview / Gordon DunsireCIGScotland
Presented at the RDA for Implementers Conference, 27 May 2015 at the National Library of Scotland, Edinburgh. Organised by the Cataloguing & Indexing Group in Scotland
Slides by Brian Kelly, UKOLN related to a peer-reviewed paper on "A Contextual Framework For Standards" presented at the "Workshop on E-Government: Barriers and Opportunities" held in Edinburgh on 23 May 2006.
See http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/e-government-2006-05/
FAIRsharing: curating an ecosystem of research standards and databasesAllyson Lister
FAIRsharing is an informative and educational resource on interlinked standards, databases and policies, three key elements of the FAIR ecosystem. FAIRsharing is adopted by funders, publishers and communities across all research disciplines. It promotes the existence and value of these resources to aid data sharing and consequently requires a high standard of curation to ensure accurate and timely information is provided for all of our stakeholder groups. Here we discuss the methods employed and challenges faced during curation and maintenance of existing content as well as the introduction of new features. We will describe how our curation team uses a blend of manual and semi-automated curation to work on individual records and across large subsets of the registry. We also will discuss the benefits of both in-house curation and community-driven curation provided by our stakeholder groups.
A Whirlwind tour of the FAIR Principles, ELIXIR, and FAIRsharing in the conte...Allyson Lister
The slides used for a lecture given at the University of York, where I introduced the FAIR principles and FAIRsharing, and put them in the context of ELIXIR and ELIXIR UK. FAIRsharing is an informative and educational resource on interlinked standards, databases and policies, three key elements of the FAIR ecosystem. FAIRsharing is adopted by funders, publishers and communities across all research disciplines. It promotes the existence and value of these resources to aid data discovery, interoperability and sharing across all of our stakeholder groups. Here we discuss how FAIRsharing can be searched and updated by our user community, and how you can make the best use out of it as part of a broader data management infrastructure.
Personal and Professional Development of Doctoral Candidates in the British D...Ray Wallace
The presentation introduces the audience to the British doctoral system. It describes in particular typical regulations, funding methods and research councils. It highlights the Robert’s report and interpersonal skills and charts the growth of graduate schools. It describes some more recently developments including the Vitae Researcher Development Framework (covered in some depth) and ‘Tuning’ and the emergence of European Labels.
Build Knowledge Graphs with Oracle RDF to Extract More Value from Your DataJean Ihm
AnD Summit '19 slides - Souri Das, Matthew Perry, Melli Annamalai. This presentation covers knowledge graphs built using the RDF capabilities of Oracle Spatial and Graph. We will illustrate how to define a knowledge graph, create virtual or materialized graphs from existing data (relational tables, CSV files, etc.), derive new knowledge through logical inference, navigate and query graphs using W3C standards, analyze knowledge graphs with graph algorithms, and more. Real-world use cases from various industries will also be shared.
Comes out of JSS and initiative of Policy Forum 2008 Precursor projects at Glasgow Caledonia and Manchester Universities Empirical data from analysis of semi-structured interviews with > 100 experienced researchers Phenomenographic method – Gerlese Akerlind – Individuals experience the same phenonemena differently – we only have a partial perspective – such as being a researcher. But if we obtain sufficient perspectives we may get an idea about the whole. Not pre-defined, but by contrasting the data looking for the similarities and differences in what people have to say about a phenonemena. For us, this approach resulted in over 1,000 characteristics and variants being identified: – For example: a number of people said it was important to be able to analyse data as a researcher we noted that as a characteristic, but a few also said it was important to be able to analyse other peoples data not just your own, so we noted that as a variant. The resulting information was organised and re-organised (or clustered) into areas that seemed most appropriate. Much debate over this and the order of things. The project started with 9 main areas and, after much discussion and deliberation, finished with 4. Much debate over ‘clusters’ and ‘order’
What wasn’t mentioned – specialist groups came into their own. What wasn’t mentioned – equally noticeable Enterprise, Collaboration & teamwork, Public engagement, Income generation as opposed to grant applications Global perspective, New technologies and research areas, Ethics, health & safety Enterprise – not even mentioned as a characteristic: be interesting to run survey in 10 years time. Collaboration and teamwork - Teamwork - no mention of this although managing individual relationships was viewed as significant by the interviewees. The use of new technology to promote research presence. Internationalism = absent. We drew on the sector and a range of stakeholders to help plug the gaps and give us their perspective. RCUK, Beacons for PE, RIN, careers – employers at the end. Consultation – Sept 2010 Feedback from individuals and project group and advisory group. Expert panel – who validated the RDF. Some given the whole RDF others a Domain - interviewed closely about. Minor tweaks – but all could identify themselves in it. Sector wide view = extremely powerful. Not just what an individual supervisor or PI says is important for a research career – but what the sector says is – based on the professions’ view. May not all be relevant at any one time – but it probably will be relevant in one way or another over time
JSS was one dimensional – this is 3D. Richness, depth, flexibility. Assist individuals, at all stages, with their professional development – i.e. from new researchers to those with Global renown Development framework: knowledge, behaviours and attitudes appropriate for the profession Ethics, integrity, academic writing & publications, enthusiasm, self–confidence and perseverance. Passion and drive not so critical if you are a dentist Shift from ‘training and skills’ to ‘development’ and implies a shift from ‘measuring’ to ‘evidencing’ (personal view) Challenges: Large and scary! Prone to the pitfalls of ‘Perception’ ‘ data’, ‘ethics’, ‘experiment’ Resist the temptation of ‘Phasing’ Can’t measure enthusiasm or creativity Only useful if you want to stay in academia… Audience – who is it for? different perspectives emerge from stakeholders with different purposes for RDF