acc 497 week 4 income tax implication of capital investment decisions,acc 497 week 4 team goodwill,acc 497 week 4 knowledge check,acc 497 week 4 international versus us standards new,acc 497 week 4 learning team discussion new,uop acc 497,acc 497,uop acc 497 week 4 tutorial,acc 497 week 4 assignment,uop acc 497 week 4 help

1. UOP ACC 497 Week 4 knowledge Check NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/acc-497-uop/acc-497-
week-4-knowledge-check-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ACC 497 Week 4 knowledge Check NEW
1.
A public entity changed from the straight-line method to the
declining balance method of depreciation for all newly acquired
assets. This change has no material effect on the current year’s
financial statements but is reasonably certain to have a
substantial effect in later years. The client’s financial statements
contain no material misstatements and the auditor concurs with
this change. If the change is disclosed in the notes to the financial
statements, the auditor should issue a report with a(n):

2. unqualified opinion.
“except for” qualified opinion.
explanatory paragraph.
consistency modification.
2.
The single audit requirement applies to:
All audits of state and local government reporting entities.
Most audits of state and local governments expending federal
grant funds.
Financial audits of all not-for-profit entities.
Only those governments and not-for-profit entities that are
audited by a federal audit agency.

3. 3.
For each of the following independent situations, indicate the
reason for and the type of financial statement audit report that
you would issue. Assume that all companies mentioned are
private companies and that each item is at least material.
a. Thibodeau Mines, Inc., uses LIFO for valuing inventories held in
the United States and FIFO for inventories produced and held in
its foreign operations.
b. Walker Computers is suing your client, Super Software, for
royalties over patent infringement. Super Software’s outside legal
counsel assures you that Walker’s case is completely without
merit.
c. In previous years, your client, Merc International, has
consolidated its Panamanian subsidiary. Because of restrictions
on repatriation of earnings placed on all foreign-owned
corporations in Panama, Merc International has decided to
account for the subsidiary on the equity basis in the current year.
You concur with the change
d. In prior years, Worcester Wool Mills has used current market
prices to value its inventory of raw wool. During the current year,
Worcester changed to FIFO for valuing raw wool.

4. e. Upon review of the recent history of the lives of its specialized
automobiles, Gas Leak Technology justifiably changed the service
lives for depreciation purposes on its autos from five years to
three years. This change resulted in a material amount of
additional depreciation expense.
f. During the audit of Brannon Bakery Equipment, you found that
a material amount of inventory had been excluded from the
company’s financial statements. After discussing this problem
with management, you become convinced that it was an
unintentional oversight. Management appropriately corrected the
error prior to your finalization of field work.
g. Jay Rich, CPA, holds 10 percent of the stock in Rothenburg
Construction Company. The board of directors of Rothenburg
asks Rich to conduct its audit. Rich completes the audit and
determines that the financial statements present fairly in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
h. Ramamoorthi Savings and Loan’s financial condition has been
deteriorating for the last five years. Most of its problems result
from loans made to real estate developers in Saint Johns County.
Your review of the loan portfolio indicates that there should be a
major increase in the loan-loss reserve. Based on your
calculations, the proposed writedown of the loans will put
Ramamoorthi into violation of the state’s capital requirements.
The client refuses to make the adjustment or to disclose the
possible going concern issue in the notes to the financial
statements.

5. 4.
When reporting on comparative financial statements for a private
company, which of the following circumstances should ordinarily
cause the auditor to change the previously issued opinion on the
prior year’s financial statements?
A departure from generally accepted accounting principles
caused an adverse opinion on the prior year’s financial
statements, and those statements have been properly restated.
The prior year’s financial statements are restated following the
purchase of another company in the current year.
A change in accounting principle causes the auditor to make a
consistency modification in the current year’s audit report.
A scope limitation caused a qualified opinion on the prior year’s
financial statements, but the current year’s opinion is properly
unmodified.
5.
Which of the following best describes the relationship between
generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) and generally
accepted government auditing standards (GAGAS)?
Audits of state and local governments always require that the
audit be conducted in accordance with both GAAS and GAGAS.

6. GAAS apply to independent CPA auditors; GAGAS apply to
governmental auditors.
Audits conducted in conformity with GAGAS may also require the
auditor to conform to GAAS.
Audits done in accordance with GAAS must also be done in
accordance with GAGAS.
6.
Under the existing GAAP hierarchy for state and local government
financial reporting, the GASB Implementation guides are:
More authoritative than the AICPA state and local government
audit guide.
Less authoritative than GASB Technical Bulletins.
More authoritative than GASB Statements.
Equally authoritative to AICPA Practice Bulletins.
7.

7. Collier County had the following federal award activity during the
most recent fiscal year.
Required
a.&b. Based upon the size and information provided select "X" if
the programs are Type A with low risk and high risk or Type B
with low risk and high risk programs.
8
Which of the following would be considered Category (b) GAAP
for state and local government auditees?
GASB Technical Bulletins.
GASB Statements and Interpretations.
GASB Implementation Guides.
AICPA Practice Bulletins if specifically made applicable to state
and local governments by the AICPA and cleared by the GASB.

8. 9.
Audits of state and local governments may be performed by all of
the following except:
State audit agencies.
Independent CPAs.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Federal grantor agencies.
10.
One of the primary purposes of the Single Audit Act of 1984
(amended in 1996) is to:
Promote the efficient and effective use of audit resources.
Detect fraud, waste and abuse in government entities.

9. Allow federal auditors greater access to government entities
receiving federal funds.
Make audit activity legal at the federal level