This document summarizes the key challenges and strategies for addressing institutionalized gender inequality. It discusses how major institutions are inherently gendered in favoring men, and how this bias becomes deeply embedded and reinforced over time through social norms and conventions. It emphasizes that truly expanding women's capabilities requires transforming gender relations and the institutions that preserve inequality. The document also examines how gender mainstreaming efforts face challenges becoming marginalized or failing to create meaningful change. Overall, it argues that addressing institutionalized gender bias requires deep analysis of the implicit rules and power structures across different levels and spheres of society that privilege men and undermine gender equality.
Gender Problems of Uzbekistan in the Globalization ContextYogeshIJTSRD
This article recognizes the need and significance of gender equality in the process of ongoing democratic reforms. Under the globalization influence, current issues such as gender problems, rising poverty and unemployment, discrimination against women in the labor market and marginalization, the increase in violence against women, and the international cooperation role in addressing these challenges have been analyzed to become more acute. Alimukhamedova Nodira Yadgarovna "Gender Problems of Uzbekistan in the Globalization Context" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Special Issue | Innovative Development of Modern Research , April 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd40069.pdf Paper URL : https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/other/40069/gender-problems-of-uzbekistan-in-the-globalization-context/alimukhamedova-nodira-yadgarovna
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Gender Problems of Uzbekistan in the Globalization ContextYogeshIJTSRD
This article recognizes the need and significance of gender equality in the process of ongoing democratic reforms. Under the globalization influence, current issues such as gender problems, rising poverty and unemployment, discrimination against women in the labor market and marginalization, the increase in violence against women, and the international cooperation role in addressing these challenges have been analyzed to become more acute. Alimukhamedova Nodira Yadgarovna "Gender Problems of Uzbekistan in the Globalization Context" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Special Issue | Innovative Development of Modern Research , April 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd40069.pdf Paper URL : https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/other/40069/gender-problems-of-uzbekistan-in-the-globalization-context/alimukhamedova-nodira-yadgarovna
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Evidence of gender inequality and bias is all around us. Workplace prejudice has been found to affect workers’ salaries and career progression. Fighting gender stereotypes and prejudice by employers makes good business sense and in many countries, it's a legal obligation. This study aimed at investigating three factors believed to influence gender equality at the workplace. These included culture, distribution of resources and interpersonal relations. Five select medium sized public and private sector organizations based in Meru County were investigated. Each select organization employed over 100 workers .A total of 102 ordinary workers were randomly selected to participate in the study. Interviews and questionnaires were used as the main data collection tools. The study observed that women are more discriminated at the workplace. Culture plays a key role in perpetuating gender imbalance at the workplace due to men being dominant while women have been subordinate in the society. Further, outdated beliefs and separate gender roles have been responsible for holding women back. On distribution of resources, women were found to be under-represented in major decision making organs in the organization and suffered unequal access to economic resources .However cases of pay based on gender were negligible. Regarding interpersonal relations, the study observed that cases of sexual harassment play a key role in advancing gender inequality. The study noted that gender inequality at the workplace was responsible for cases of hostile working atmosphere, worker conflicts, harassment of subordinates by superiors, low productivity and slow growth of the organization. Various solutions to gender discrimination were recommended by the study. These include enforcing affirmative action in areas where there exists high discrimination against one gender. Individual organizations should invest in education, sensitization and mentorship programs to champion gender equality. Further, the government should enact more laws to prohibit gender discrimination practices. Organizations need to develop internal policies that punish offenders of gender discrimination and enforce a policy of equal-pay-for –equal work.
Gender Inequality in Development
Dr. Vibhuti Patel, Director, PGSR
Prof. & HOD, University Department of Economics,
SNDT Women’s University, Smt. Thakersey Road, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020
Phone-26770227®, 22052970 Mobile-9321040048
E mail:vibhuti.np@gmail.com
Women’s Studies have challenged the conventional indicators of development that focus on urbanisation, higher education, mobility of labour, technological development, modernisation, infra-structural development, industrialisation, mechamisation in agricultural, white revolution, green revolution, blue revolution so on and so forth. Development dialogue of the 1ast 32 years (1975 to the present) resulted into intellectual scrutiny with gender lens of
• The critique of trickledown theory
• Marginalisation thesis popularised by the UN as WID (Women in Development)
• ‘Integration of Women’ Approach known as Women and Development (WAD)
• Development Alternatives with Women (DAWN) at Nairobi Conference, 1985
• Gender and Development (GAD)- Women in Decision Making Process, 1990
• Adoption of CEDAW-Convention on all forms of Discrimination against Women
• Human Development Index, Gender Empowerment Measure, 1995
• Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 2000
• Women Empowerment Policy, GoI, 2001
• Gender Mainstreaming in planning, policy making and programme Implementation
Since its endorsement in 1995, the level of the adoption of gender mainstreaming in the leadership positions remains an issue among stakeholders. Lack of women representation in leadership positions has been attributed
Global Discourse, Situated Traditions and Muslim Women’s Agency in Pakistan.
Globalization: Feminization of Poverty and need for Gender responsive social protection in Pakistan
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Evidence of gender inequality and bias is all around us. Workplace prejudice has been found to affect workers’ salaries and career progression. Fighting gender stereotypes and prejudice by employers makes good business sense and in many countries, it's a legal obligation. This study aimed at investigating three factors believed to influence gender equality at the workplace. These included culture, distribution of resources and interpersonal relations. Five select medium sized public and private sector organizations based in Meru County were investigated. Each select organization employed over 100 workers .A total of 102 ordinary workers were randomly selected to participate in the study. Interviews and questionnaires were used as the main data collection tools. The study observed that women are more discriminated at the workplace. Culture plays a key role in perpetuating gender imbalance at the workplace due to men being dominant while women have been subordinate in the society. Further, outdated beliefs and separate gender roles have been responsible for holding women back. On distribution of resources, women were found to be under-represented in major decision making organs in the organization and suffered unequal access to economic resources .However cases of pay based on gender were negligible. Regarding interpersonal relations, the study observed that cases of sexual harassment play a key role in advancing gender inequality. The study noted that gender inequality at the workplace was responsible for cases of hostile working atmosphere, worker conflicts, harassment of subordinates by superiors, low productivity and slow growth of the organization. Various solutions to gender discrimination were recommended by the study. These include enforcing affirmative action in areas where there exists high discrimination against one gender. Individual organizations should invest in education, sensitization and mentorship programs to champion gender equality. Further, the government should enact more laws to prohibit gender discrimination practices. Organizations need to develop internal policies that punish offenders of gender discrimination and enforce a policy of equal-pay-for –equal work.
Gender Inequality in Development
Dr. Vibhuti Patel, Director, PGSR
Prof. & HOD, University Department of Economics,
SNDT Women’s University, Smt. Thakersey Road, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020
Phone-26770227®, 22052970 Mobile-9321040048
E mail:vibhuti.np@gmail.com
Women’s Studies have challenged the conventional indicators of development that focus on urbanisation, higher education, mobility of labour, technological development, modernisation, infra-structural development, industrialisation, mechamisation in agricultural, white revolution, green revolution, blue revolution so on and so forth. Development dialogue of the 1ast 32 years (1975 to the present) resulted into intellectual scrutiny with gender lens of
• The critique of trickledown theory
• Marginalisation thesis popularised by the UN as WID (Women in Development)
• ‘Integration of Women’ Approach known as Women and Development (WAD)
• Development Alternatives with Women (DAWN) at Nairobi Conference, 1985
• Gender and Development (GAD)- Women in Decision Making Process, 1990
• Adoption of CEDAW-Convention on all forms of Discrimination against Women
• Human Development Index, Gender Empowerment Measure, 1995
• Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 2000
• Women Empowerment Policy, GoI, 2001
• Gender Mainstreaming in planning, policy making and programme Implementation
Since its endorsement in 1995, the level of the adoption of gender mainstreaming in the leadership positions remains an issue among stakeholders. Lack of women representation in leadership positions has been attributed
Global Discourse, Situated Traditions and Muslim Women’s Agency in Pakistan.
Globalization: Feminization of Poverty and need for Gender responsive social protection in Pakistan
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
This manual was developed to equip young people with a better understanding of the peculiar issues faced by young women and girls, how gender constructs and gender inequality has contributed to this, and how young people can advocate for more equitable societies and gender just communities and institutions. Young people will also be equipped to develop change pathways for tackling gender discrimination including applying a gender analysis in all their advocacy initiatives and leveraging movements and collective efforts for gender justice.
Presentation subjects is : Let's put India first, according to that topic Women's Security and Empowerment is the issue for India so that this is the solution for it. This presentation is specially for Women's about their safety and Empowerment.
As a result of our gender process in the South America Region Office, including the ICRW gender assessment of the Indigenous People’s Rights Program, the South America Regional Office (SAMRO) has determined the need to carry out a thorough contextual analysis that would help SAMRO develop an intersectional framework for gender and indigenous people’s rights to serve the development of its programmatic strategies and actions.
SAMRO aims to apply this intersectional approach in order to identify and address the effects of intersectional forms of discrimination, especially on women (as opposed to addressing forms of discrimination in isolation of each other). This approach will help SAMRO to determine specific goals and outcomes that are better aimed at addressing specific indigenous peoples and their rights in each of our programs. It will help us build up a common position on these issues and improve our work on gender justice in the region.
Women Empowerment through SHGs in India and Andhra Pradeshpaperpublications3
Abstract: The self-help group is functioning very effective dimension role at creating rural livelihood at sustain, the savings and bank linkages are eliminating poverty and creating the effective social functions by participating women at village level committees as a member at each and every village level committees. The self help group members are very active part of an economical status, through Banks they are getting the loan, and loan amount is utilizing for purposeful fields and at their children education, economic activity. And it creates self-reliance, self-esteem, self-production, joint responsibility, self-determination by mobilizing internal indigenous resources of the person the group. In this paper attempt to women empowerment through SHGs in India and Andhra Pradesh.
Women Empowerment through SHGs A Case Study of Jalgaon District of Maharashtraijtsrd
The status of women indicates the character of the country “said by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehruâ€. Women empowerment is a process in which women challenge the existing norms and culture, to effectively promote their well being. The participation of women in self help groups SHG's made a significant impact on their empowerment both in social and economical aspects. This study addresses women empowerment through self help groups in Jalgaon District of Maharashtra. The information required for the study has been collected from both the primary and secondary sources. A Random sampling method has been followed. Average and Percentage analysis was carried out to draw meaningful interpretation of the results. The results of the study revealed that the SHG's have had greater impact on both economic and social aspects of the beneficiaries. Arun Kumar Tripathy "Women Empowerment through SHGs: A Case Study of Jalgaon District of Maharashtra" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-6 , October 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd46371.pdf Paper URL : https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/other/46371/women-empowerment-through-shgs-a-case-study-of-jalgaon-district-of-maharashtra/arun-kumar-tripathy
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
Gender Inequality in Development
Dr. Vibhuti Patel, Director, PGSR
Prof. & HOD, University Department of Economics,
SNDT Women’s University, Smt. Thakersey Road, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020
Phone-26770227®, 22052970 Mobile-9321040048
E mail:vibhuti.np@gmail.com
Women’s Studies have challenged the conventional indicators of development that focus on urbanisation, higher education, mobility of labour, technological development, modernisation, infra-structural development, industrialisation, mechamisation in agricultural, white revolution, green revolution, blue revolution so on and so forth. Development dialogue of the 1ast 32 years (1975 to the present) resulted into intellectual scrutiny with gender lens of
• The critique of trickledown theory
• Marginalisation thesis popularised by the UN as WID (Women in Development)
• ‘Integration of Women’ Approach known as Women and Development (WAD)
• Development Alternatives with Women (DAWN) at Nairobi Conference, 1985
• Gender and Development (GAD)- Women in Decision Making Process, 1990
• Adoption of CEDAW-Convention on all forms of Discrimination against Women
• Human Development Index, Gender Empowerment Measure, 1995
• Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), 2000
• Women Empowerment Policy, GoI, 2001
• Gender Mainstreaming in planning, policy making and programme Implementation
With the official recognition of subordinate status of women in economic, social, educational political and cultural spheres by all nation states, two approaches became popular with regard to women in development process. First one was an instrumentalist approach influenced by Human Resource Development philosophy that supported investment in women so that their efficiency and productivity would increase which would increase their economic and social status. As against this, the 2nd approach was guided by Human Development concept that emphasised the quality of life or wellbeing aspect of investment in women. In this approach attainment of education, health, nutrition and better quality of life is considered to be an end in itself. Both approaches are interlinked (Sen, 1999).
3rd MenEngage Global Symposium Key Info for Supporters and OrganizersTomHornbrook
These slides summarize the full concept note for the 3rd MenEngage Global Symposium - available at www.menengage.org/kigalisymposium
MenEngage Alliance is a global alliance comprising dozens of country networks spread across many regions of the world, hundreds of non-governmental organizations as well as UN partners.
Together, we work to transform unequal power-relations and dismantle patriarchy through transforming masculinities and engaging men and boys to advance women’s rights and gender justice for all.
We have more than 700 member organisations across 70 countries worldwide organised in decentralized country and regional-level networks.
MEDIA PORTRAYAL OF WOMEN IN GOVERNANCE: WHAT HAS CHANGED?AJHSSR Journal
ABSTRACT: The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)
which is now ratified by the majority of the world's governments; despite this, women’s representation in
governance remains abysmally poor. The media have persistently portrayed women in a low status like sex
objects, wives, mothers, caregivers, victims and dependants, unlike men who are portrayed as professionals and
independent leaders. Again, as men largely control means of communication and women do not have equal
representation in the media, these stereotypes have shaped the minds of media consumers negatively about
female gender roles in the society and have potentially excluded women from full participation in public life.
Taking this into account, this study in search of the causes contends that the poor portrayal of women in
governance and positions of authority remain the critical components of low political participation of women in
governance. The participants were drawn from a multi-layered cluster of educated women across three cities in
Anambra State spread across the three senatorial districts whose ages ranged from 26 to 57 years with a mean
age of 38-50yrs. In the design, we used qualitative design which employed the uses of in-depth interview to
elicit the opinion of the 19 participants on women’s participation in governance while we used thematic analysis
to analyze qualitative data. In the result patriarchal system, funding, domestic engagements emerged as the
leading constraints which have affected media portrayal of women in governance. Also, discrimination,
marginalization, low education and low levels of awareness emerged as themes when the participants were
asked about the factors which increase the likelihood of unfavorable media portrayal of women in governance.
Considering the consequences, the study recommends a conscientious gender mainstreaming as well as
proactive legislation to deepen gender affirmation and inclusiveness in governance.
Drawing upon research undertaken with community development practitioners in the North Central of Nigeria, this
article argues that feminist community development processes have been undermined by the application of policy
initiatives which were designed to achieve equality and fairness. The application of targeted and technically neutral
systems has resulted in a managerialist approach to community development which has privileged masculinist practices
and marginalized the intersubjective, consciousness-raising practices which are central to feminism. The consequence is
that the broader emancipatory principles of community development practice have been distorted within a policy
discourse of equality
Chapter twoLiterature ReviewThis chapter will demonstrate ot.docxchristinemaritza
Chapter two
Literature Review
This chapter will demonstrate other's studies and literature done by students, researcher and scholars. This will cover the following points:
· History and definition of women empowerment
· Determinants of women empowerment
· Progress of women empowerment in Oman
· Omanisation and women empowerment (vision 2020)
· Management of Human Resources in Oman
Definition of Women Empowerment
The concept of women empowerment is gaining significance all over the world as evidenced by the measures taken by major countries, researches made by academicians of universities, and initiatives taken by international platforms like United Nations. The existing research and literature indicate that concept of women empowerment appeared in the second half of the twentieth century. But historical facts show that this concept appeared in 7th century when Islam religion came into being. The rights of women as given in the Qura’n and the traditions of Prophet Muhammad were a revolutionary step in the 7th century.
Spiritual equality of sexes has been recognized in Islam. This is due to the recognition by classical Muslim jurisprudence of the essential inequality of men and women and division of rights of women into different categories as wife, mother and daughter instead of women’s rights(Mandal,2013).
The rights given in Qura’n, though revolutionary at that time, recognized the need for a gradual approach towards achievement of the full message of the Qura’n. The United Nations in this regard played an important role by emphasizing a gender focus approach and enhancing critical importance of women empowerment through declaration of the ‘Women’s Decade’ in 1975.(Mandal,2013)
The concept of women empowerment is a boiling issue all over the world. Women Empowerment refers to "increasing and improving the social, economic, political and legal strength of the women, to ensure equal-right to women, and to make them confident enough to claim their rights".(Teamwork,2015)
The concept in this wider and comprehensive sense became popular through the United Nations specialized institutions in the beginning of the 1990’s. The United Nations various institutions became especially aware of the increasing significance of women’s empowerment to the success of development programs in developing countries. The empowerment of women was crucial component to a great number of declarations and platforms of action such as the 1990 World Conference on Education for All, the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, the 1993 Human Rights Conference, the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development, the 1995 World Summit for Social Development and the Regional Preparatory Conferences for the 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women. This increased interest in, and understanding of, women’s pivotal role in the development process has also been mirrored in the goals and priorities of all UN organizations and agencies. The Unit ...
WOMEN EMPOWERMENT IMPREGNATES THE DEVELOPMENT 21ST CENTURY SCENARIO ijejournal
Wherever Women is respected, God resides there. This Vedic verse would came true with the empowerment of women only. It is one of the pivotal features of the development also. According to Todaro, development refers to a multi-dimensional process which recognize the entire economic and social systems. Therefore development signifies an elimination of poverty, inequality and unemployment which can yield higher dividend in future. In this context, the emancipation of women from the vicious grips of social, economical and gender-based discrimination is vital. Women empowerment is an aid to establish economic stability,judicial strength and all other rights which can lessen gender gap considerably. 21st Century is an age of Science and technology, an era of globalization where social transformation accelerates development with a greater pace. In this age of tele-working, tele-shopping and tele-learning, women are considered as mainstream for sustainable development. Today the modern woman is so deft that she can easily make her presence felt in politics, literature, entertainment, technology everywhere. And this empowermentdevelopment nexus is actually self-sustaining to each other.
The role of gender in enhancing the development agendaJack Onyisi Abebe
Gender and development is important because it focuses on connections between gender and development initiatives and feminists’ perspectives, and deals with issues such as health and education, decision making and leadership, peace building, violence against women and economic empowerment. Development cannot be realized without the very significant component of gender. Countries the world over have proved that exclusion of women in development has rendered their development efforts futile.
Reproductive Health, Population Control and Women’s Sexuality: the Indian Experience
www.researchtrend.net
ABSTRACT: Women’s sexuality has always been viewed in a narrow sense, reducing it into mere reproductive health of future mothers who are expected to give birth to healthy children for the nation’s growth and development. This paper traces the relationship of women’s sexuality and their health and tries to see how it shapes their lives and perspective of well-being. Women’s reproductive health has never been an independent concern except in relation to their reproductive capacities. It focuses on the linkages between women’s choice, autonomy, voices, rights and state health policies imposed on them. This paper also explores the shaping of the ‘motherhood’ imagery used by leaders of so called nation building. It is argued here that women are viewed as mother goddesses and expected to fulfill their motherly roles for nation building rather than acknowledge their existence as an individual having independent choice and rights. The article locates the discourse of sexuality, fertility and population control in pre- and post-independence India and its impact over women’s control of their body, fertility and access to basic health services through larger political debates and policy frameworks.
Similar to Article: Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality (20)
Gender At Work's associates recommend ten books and articles that have moved them personally, deepened their insight and are incredibly relevant to the organization's work.
Disrupting Institutional Rules & Organizational Practices for Women's Rights ...Gender at Work .
LSE Talk Presentation, January 2014
Disrupting Institutional Rules & Organizational Practices for Women's Rights and Gender Equality
Includes Case Studies with examples of G@W's work in India and South Africa.
G@W Action Learning Process with Four South African Trade UnionsGender at Work .
The Gender at Work Action Learning Process
with Four South African Trade Unions. Part of The Transformation of Work research series which is produced by the Solidarity Center to expand scholarship on
and understanding of issues facing workers in an increasingly globalized world.
Article: Strategising for Gender Equality in the 21st CenturyGender at Work .
Joanne Sandler & Aruna Rao (2012): The elephant in the room and the dragons at the gate: strategising for gender equality in the 21st century, Gender & Development
Srilatha Batliwala's presentation 'Feminist Theory in Context: Then and Now' traces changes in feminist theory from the 70's to the present day and looks at G@W's framework for assessing change in the roots of gender inequality.
A Glimpse into the India Program: G@W is a collective working to strengthen organizations in order to build cultures of equality and social justice, and has had a presence in India since 2008.
The story of the organization:
Why did we set up Gender at Work?
Where have we worked with whom?
Why do we have associates?
What have we learned from our fundraising?
Dalit Women's Livelihood Accountability Initiative Gender at Work .
Partnering with 4 organisations from UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA on an intensive programme on Dalit women and livelihood in order to explore the three dimensions of gender and caste in the context of the right to work.
Women's movements and disruption by Lisa Venklasen of Just Associates (JASS) Gender at Work .
Justice movements organize and mobilize collective action to disrupt the status quo and demand social change. This was one of the presentations at the Global Gender Program panel discussion, co-sponsored by the Gender and Development Journal, Gender at Work and Oxfam. The seminar aimed to retrace the feminist vision that drove gender mainstreaming; discuss stories of transforming gender relations in organizations and communities as well as stories of resistance to change; and explore ruptural ideas and actions that move us beyond gender mainstreaming to influence and transform development and change. It took place on September 20, 2013 at The Elliott School of International Affairs, Washington, DC.
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !KatiaHIMEUR1
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Generating a custom Ruby SDK for your web service or Rails API using Smithyg2nightmarescribd
Have you ever wanted a Ruby client API to communicate with your web service? Smithy is a protocol-agnostic language for defining services and SDKs. Smithy Ruby is an implementation of Smithy that generates a Ruby SDK using a Smithy model. In this talk, we will explore Smithy and Smithy Ruby to learn how to generate custom feature-rich SDKs that can communicate with any web service, such as a Rails JSON API.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
1. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
Occasional Paper
no. 8
October 2002
Unravelling Institutionalized
Gender Inequality
By Aruna Rao and David Kelleher
Convenors, Gender at Work
Each major institutional arena is gendered in its male bias-its failure to value
or recognize reproductive work, defining it as “unproductive” or basing
effective participation on a capacity to attain freedom from the reproductive
sphereâ ¦ [This bias] is then deeply reinforced-institutionalized through the
formation of social networks, or shared understandings and conventions of
inclusion or exclusion, justified ideologically, which privilege the participation
of a particular social group.
Anne Marie Goetz, 1997
The expansion of women's capabilities not only enhances women's own
freedom and well being, but also has many other effects on the lives of all.
An enhancement of women's active agency can, in many circumstances,
contribute substantially to the lives of all people - men as well as women,
children as well as adults.
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (1 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
2. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
Amartya Sen (New Delhi, November 2001)
I. Introduction
Today, the implications of gross gender oppression for peace and human
security have come into sharp focus. As persistent gender inequalities continue
we need to rethink concepts and strategies for promoting women's dignity and
rights. National security interests, when they are defined narrowly as military
security fundamentally thwart emerging notions of human security. The latter
emphasizes sustainable development, gender justice, human rights, and
democracy.
Moreover, Progress of the World's Women (UNIFEM, 2000) reports that income
inequalities between both countries and individuals have been accelerating since
the early 1970s. Recent global economic shocks include the financial crisis in
East Asia, growing indebtedness of developing countries, persistent
unemployment in developed countries and the off-loading of welfare concerns
onto households and, particularly, the women within them. Elson sees both
promise and despair for women in globalization trends. For some women,
particularly educated women with professional skills, globalization opens up new
possibilities. For women with fewer skills, it has meant loss of livelihoods and
labor rights and increased migration as temporary, low paid workers. Feminist
economists increasingly believe that “conventional conceptions of the way in
which economies operate offer limited guidance for policies to promote women's
empowerment and ways to combine gender justice with economic justice.”
Women's progress, Elson suggests, is facilitated by a human development
approach to economic policy.
In 1990, the first Human Development Report put people back at the centre of
development, defining human development as a process of “enlarging people's
choices”. Grounded in Amartya Sen's “human capabilities” framework, which
posits that a person's enjoyment of capabilities is linked to the exercise of
entitlements, the human development approach holds that markets have to be
socially regulated so that they don't undermine human development objectives,
and that governments and civil society organizations must create new
arrangements that address risk and provide security in case of market failure. It
also calls for governments to restructure public expenditures to develop the
capabilities of the poor. In terms of women's empowerment and gender justice,
Elson points out that a human development approach makes social
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (2 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
3. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
transformation central to the development agenda.
Choices for women, especially poor women, cannot be enlarged without a
change in relations between women and men as well as in the ideologies and
institutions that preserve and reproduce gender inequality. This does not
mean reversing positions, so that men become subordinate and women
dominant. Rather, it means negotiating new kinds of relationships that are
based not on power over others but on a mutual development of creative
human energy (power to based on power within and power with). It also
means negotiating new kinds of institutions, incorporating new norms and
rules that support egalitarian and just relations between women and men.
(Elson, 2000)
Much effort in the past decade has gone into creating those new rules -- both
through conditions for enhanced women's agency and by building women's
capabilities to choose and to act. In countries as different as India and Brazil,
women are finding places in local governance structures. (In India, over one
million women have been elected to local panchayats as a result of a 1993
amendment to the Indian Constitution requiring that one third of the elected
seats to local governing bodies be reserved for women.) Self-help groups are
mushrooming as a result of a variety of development interventions from forestry
and environmental efforts to micro-credit schemes. (In India, for example,
there are over 700,000 women's self-help groups - a potentially powerful
channel for voicing women's interests.) In a few countries, women have been
elected to national parliaments in significant numbers. South Africa however, is
the only southern country that has achieved 30 percent parliamentary
representation by women.
Over the past ten years, the concept of “gender mainstreaming” has become
more prevalent in United Nations and national government circles. As defined
by the UN, gender mainstreaming is the “process of assessing the implications
for women and men of any planned action, including legislation, policies or
programmes, in any area and at all levels. It is a strategy for making women's
as well as men's concerns and experiences an integral dimension in the design,
implementation, monitoring and evaluation of policies and programmes in all
political, economic and societal spheres so that women and men benefit equally
and inequality is not perpetuated. The ultimate goal is to achieve gender
equality.” (E/1997/L.3014 July 1997)
By most estimates, gender mainstreaming within the UN system and national
governments faces an uphill struggle. Gender equality concerns are not
mainstreamed but ghettoized as special machinery created to deal with women's
issues. Sometimes this ghetto becomes a space in which to advocate broadly
for women's interests while connecting to a women's political constituency and
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (3 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
4. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
scrutinizing national budgets and resource allocations. Mostly, however, it does
little good. A recent review of gender mainstreaming in Asia and the Pacific
found that in countries such as Cambodia, which were emerging from conflict
situations, putting a gender infrastructure in place was just beginning as focus
was on developing policies, building capacity and capturing more resources.
Established bureaucratic contexts such as the Philippines were concentrating
more with developing specialized expertise on for example, gender and
economic globalization and in addressing deep-seated cultural barriers to gender
equality within bureaucratic structures.
A problem then arises, for once the issue slips into what Staudt calls the
“bureaucratic mire” it gets bogged down in technical questions. Then the case
can be made only piecemeal in myriad specific locations and disciplines and the
effort loses connections to its original constituency. Countering such
dismemberment usually involves mobilizing women and advocating for women's
interests (as was done in Japan for the Basic Law for A Gender Equal Society).
In rare cases, the constituency prevails: despite the reluctance of the UN
Transitional Administration in East Timor to support a 30 percent quota for
women in all government positions, the formation and campaigning of the
Women's National Caucus led to the election of 24 percent women to those
posts.
Women's interests are also compromised when rules are not followed or where
there are no rules. In certain public sector contexts in Latin America for
example, Gloria Bonder suggests that new rules to promote gender equity don't
stick because of the the “normality of transgressions” and corruption with
organizations operating amidst political unpredictability. All the more heartening
are organizations such as Masum, a community-level organization in the Indian
state of Maharashtra, which prove that it is possible to institutionalize a
structure and new rules that overturn inequalities of gender, caste and class,
promote a new way of relating and redefine development at the grassroots,
significantly improving people's life chances.
In governmental and non-governmental organizations, efforts toward
organizational change for gender equality have often involved putting in place
gender-equitable policies, organizational mechanisms to steer this work, building
specialist technical expertise for gender equality work, and advocating greater
resource allocation to women's programs and women's interests - what we call
the four holy cows of gender work. A review of these interventions indicates
that small to moderate gains in gender equality were achieved; however, most
projects were unable to accomplish as much as they intended because of
insufficient resources, resistance of male managers, organizational culture, and
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (4 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
5. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
lack of accountability including mechanisms to monitor and prevent gradual
backsliding.
For some, the above experiences have led to a deeper examination of
development and human rights organizations (Goetz, 1997; Rao et.al, 1999).
For others, preparation for implementing a progressive political agenda (such as
in South Africa) forced better acquaintance with government organizations and
how they work. However, many of us have come to believe that we need to
think more deeply about institutions, that is, the rules of the game underlying
organizational forms. Just as you don't 'add the idea that the world is round to
the idea that the world is flat' (Minnich, 1995) -- trying to 'add gender' to the
existing structure and work of organizations is ultimately futile.
We have set out therefore to review illustrative interventions of organizational
change for gender equality, to analyze useful conceptual and methodological
approaches, and to offer some key perspectives on how to move the work
forward, drawing on our experiences and writings and those of colleagues. It is
important to acknowledge that the particular significance of these issues will
depend on local histories, contexts and conditions. Nevertheless we believe that
by identifying important linkages in different contexts we can deepen our
understanding and articulate new questions to further the overall process.
II. The Warp and Weft of Institutions
The major role of institutions in a society is to reduce uncertainty by
establishing a stable (but not necessarily efficient) structure to human
interaction.
Douglas North, 1990
In recent years, feminist scholarship and action has shifted its focus to the
nature of institutional values and practices, and how they embody male agency,
needs and interests, obstructing a gender equality agenda.
The terms 'institution' and 'organization' are often used synonymously, but we
find it useful to distinguish between the two. We understand institutions as
the rules for achieving social or economic ends (Kabeer, 1996). These rules
specify how resources are allocated and how tasks, responsibilities and value
are assigned. In other words, the rules determine who gets what, who does
what, and who decides. Although institutions vary within and across cultures
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (5 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
6. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
and are constantly evolving and changing, they are embedded in relational
hierarchies of gender, class, caste and other critical fault lines that define
identities and distribute power both symbolically and materially. Gender is a
primary field within or by means of which power is articulated (Scott, 1991).
Concepts of gender structure perception as well as the concrete and symbolic
organization of all social life. To the extent that these perceptions,
established as a set of objective references, establish distributions of power such as the differential control over and access to material and symbolic
resources -- gender becomes involved in the construction of power itself.
Geoff Wood (among other analysts, including North and Kabeer) identifies four
levels of institutions: state, market, community and household. In neoliberal
economics, the household is characterized as an altruistic unit where the
collective welfare is maximized by a benign household head. However, the
household is now recognized more as an arena of contestation where power is
exercised through a complex fabric of social interaction. In a South Asian
context Kumar-Range identifies this to include: “the norms of deference,
dependency, risk avoidance, plural security portfolios, blood ties, mutual
interdependence, subordination of individuality, patriarchy and the submersion
of the self to the collective identity, which together constitute socialization for
life”. Community level institutions are also highly gendered and in highly
stratified societies, patron-client relationships are the norm. Citing Leela Dube's
study of gender and kinship in South and South East Asian countries, KumarRange reminds us that kinship institutions are at the core of gender relations “family formation, bride price and dowry payments, inheritance and family
dissolution rules and practices are governed by kinship ties, and these play a
key role in shaping gender relations”. State-level institutions operate both by
formal rules and policies and informal practices. But, states are peopled with
those who live in the households and community level relationships so their
functioning reflects those intricate tapestries of power relationships. Geoff
Wood asks: “What social and cultural distance does an official have to travel
from home to work every day?” In weak public organizations, with little
accountability to the public and operating in a context of high uncertainty, that
distance may not be large; patronage and other societal institutions may
dominate in both spheres. Markets, too, “while largely shaped by the extent to
which individual entrepreneurs can interface with macroeconomic changes
taking place and benefit from them, are also influenced by household and
community-level institutions” (Kumar-Range, 2001).
If institutions are the frameworks of rules, organizations such as NGOs are the
social structures within these frameworks and act to either reinforce them or to
challenge them. These institutional norms often operate below the level of
awareness but are woven into the hierarchies, work practices and beliefs of the
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (6 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
7. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
organizations constraining organizational efforts to challenge gender-biased
norms.
Most writing and thinking about organizations describe them as rational,
mechanistic constructs consisting of policies, structures - the inevitable
organizational chart - and systems. Such thinking is embedded in the Weberian
premise that organizational decisions and actions - structure and function - are
founded in logic, efficiency and rationality. The result is consistency not
arbitrariness. However, organizations are not neutral bodies, they are
microcosms of the institutional contexts from which they spring. Genderinequitable institutions produce gender-inequitable organizations, which produce
gender inequitable outcomes-and a power base with a stake in defending those
inequitable rules.
Thus, a big part of the work is to understand and change not only how
organizations function inside (in terms of overt and hidden gender biases) but
also how organizations conceive of their mission, develop strategic thinking and
partnerships with their constituencies and, most importantly, whether they
deliver services and programs that challenge and change biased gender norms.
III. Unravelling Institutional Biases: The Role of Organizations
Although some informal actions have had critical effects on equality, most
efforts to either combat or maintain inequality are organizationally-based/
driven. For example, if there is to be a para-legal training program to help rural
women fight for their rights, most likely it will be conceived, funded, designed
and delivered by one or more organizations. (This is not to downplay the critical
importance of the participation of the women in designing these programs.)
Similarly, if a development project ignores the needs of women and maintains
and reinforces the gendered power relations, the thinking that conceived of the
project is the product of one or more sets of organizational processes,
capabilities, culture, and power relations. This section discusses the genderbiased organization's inner workings.
Gender and Organizations
Organizations swim in a sea of societal norms, which not only influence
organizational behavior but often operate below the level of consciousness.
They were a foundation on which the hierarchies, work practices and beliefs of
organizational life are built. They constrain organizational efforts to challenge
gender-biased norms both in the society and in the organization.
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (7 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
8. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
The building blocks of many of our organizations are gender biased in ways that
are quite invisible. Acker (1990) outlines at least five “gendering processes” in
organizations. Formal practices may appear neutral but discriminate against
women. Informal practices such as the expectation that staff commit to work
nights and weekends discriminate against those (mainly women) with family
responsibilities. Symbols and images in the organization such as the assumption
that supervisors need to be men, as men alone can make the hard decisions,
exclude women from even considering their own possible promotion. Everyday
social interactions such as sexual “teasing” reinforce women's subordinate place
in the organization.
Goetz also writes about the hidden gendering of organizations. She outlines a
“gendered archeology” of organizations that demonstrates how organizations
perpetuate societal norms favouring men's interests. She points to issues as the
inherent conceptual bias of institutions. Just as Elson's work that demonstrated
that economics is “fundamentally disabled” in its capacity to understand
women's inequality, fields such as peace building, and human rights are built on
conceptual understandings that have excluded women's perspectives and
interests. Goetz also discusses gendered accountability systems that focus
NGOs and state bureaucracies on donors' need for quantifiable and measurable
performance targets, rather than on the needs and interests of women clients.
Our own work, has focused on the deep structure of organizations and how it
blocks efforts to increase gender equality. By “deep structure” we mean that
collection of values, history, culture and practices that form the unquestioned,
'reasonable' way to work in organizations. At least four aspects of deep
structure perpetuate gender inequality:
1.
2.
3.
4.
valorization of heroic individualism;
the split between work and family;
exclusionary power; and
the monoculture of instrumentality.
Perhaps the most powerful of these is exclusionary power. Feminist writers
such as Ferguson and others believe that the command and control systems of
exercising power in most organizations are somehow “male” and inimical to a
female way of working. They therefore exclude women by forcing them to work
in ways not comfortable to them or which they have not been prepared by their
upbringing. This is contentious, although there is some empirical evidence of
men's preference and capacity for competitive living. Our concern, however,
relates to how power is used to exclude women's perspectives and interests.
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (8 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
9. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
One helpful way to understand the ways this is accomplished is the framework
developed by Stephen Lukes. He discusses three kinds of power:
1. Traditional power-the power to make and enforce decisions;
2. Agenda power-the power to decide what can be talked about or even
considered in organizational discourse; and
3. Hidden power-power that shapes perceptions, cognitions and preferences
so that people accept that their place in the order of things is
unchangeable and “natural.”
The ability of these dimensions of power to maintain inequitable power relations
are reinforced by the lack of democratic process in modern state and NGO
bureaucracies. Very few have political mechanisms to balance or restrain the
power of those at the top. Very few are interested in the reality of “real” politicsconstituencies, interest groups, and accountability to clients and communities.
Although some organizations pride themselves on participation, it is almost
always of a type that leaves intact the authority structure of people and ideas.
How Deep Structure Acts to Hinder Work on Gender Equality
The four aspects of deep structure listed above inhibit gender equality outcomes
in different ways. Heroic individualism focuses on winning. Goal orientation
focuses on clear outcomes rather than on the somewhat murky process of
uncovering gender inequity in social relations and institutions. Moreover, the
hero stereotype is generally male. The paucity of women heroes results in
women's interests being under-represented. Therefore, there is no pressure (or
constituency) for challenging existing gender-biased relations and ideologies.
The idea that women's rights are human rights came not from the human rights
movement but from the women's movement.
The work-family split that devalues women's participation and interests within
organizations also does not support re-organizing responsibilities inside families.
Exclusionary power blocks organizational learning, particularly on those issues
which are at odds with core organizing values. Such power regimes devalue
participation and silence the voices that would bring the alternative perspectives
and knowledge that are required to deliver gender-equal outcomes. Finally, the
monoculture of instrumentality ensures that organizational resources are
focused on producing quantifiable results leaving little time for the complexities
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (9 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
10. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
of institution-changing.
The analysis leads us to the understanding that power hides the fact that
organizations are gendered at very deep levels. That is, women are prevented
from challenging institutions by four interrelated factors:
q
q
q
q
Political access: There are neither systems nor powerful actors who can bring
women's perspectives and interests to the table;
Accountability systems: Organizational resources are steered toward quantitative
targets often only distantly related to institutional change for gender equality;
Cultural systems: The understanding of the place of work and family prevent
women from being full participants in many organizations; and
Cognitive structures: Work itself is seen only within existing, gender-biased
norms and understandings.
Both women and men internalize these factors so they seem reasonable and
“normal”. But, they result in a set of assumptions about internal organizational
dynamics and the work itself. Gendered organizations determine what is seen
as possible, reasonable and appropriate.
These systemic forces for the maintenance of the status quo do not make
change impossible. Nor do individuals within organizations lack agency. In fact,
we are the beneficiaries of generations of efforts to make organizations and
their products more gender equitable.
In the past few years, a number of in-depth gender and organizational
transformation programs have been carried out. For example, in the
Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC), a Bangladeshi development
organization working with poor rural women, the work focused on strengthening
BRAC's ability to improve its programs. Thousands of BRAC staff in analyzed
hierarchical, inter-staff and client relations from a gender-equality perspective.
They then took action to change attitudes, power relations, and work practices.
The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) has used
collaborative action research to deepen understanding of the scope and
complexity of gender issues in the workplace; and to test and develop work
environments that support women and men and new, more gender-equitable
ways of working.
Others have worked in for-profit corporations focusing on the balance between
work and family, challenging work practices and intervening to make changes
that both benefit the organization and legitimate employees' work/family
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (10 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
11. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
issues. (Bailyn, Kolb et. al., 1996). Another approach to organizational
transformation uses gender budgeting to build organizational accountability to
women and gender-equality commitments (Govender, 1997).
IV. Approaches to Gender and Organizational Change
An analysis of our experience and that of others has led us to a comprehensive
approach to organizational change for gender equality. We believe that there
are three complementary types of changes required-gender infrastructure,
organizational change and programming institutional change. As all
organizations are different, a different proportion is required in each. The table
below outlines these three approaches.
Table 1: Gender & Organizational Change Approaches
Approach/span>
Outcomes/span>
Change Strategy/span>
Notes/span>
/span>
Gender Infrastructure/span>
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
Gender policy, including family-friendly policy
Gender Unit
Increased female staff and managers
Increased resources for women's program/span>
Reference to international covenants and agreements
Management support
Internal constituency
External pressure from women's movement and/or donors /span>
This “formal” architecture is necessary but far from sufficient.
This approach may leave organizational attitudes intact, making overworked
gender staff fight uphill battles.
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (11 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
12. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
Unlikely to develop new program oriented to changing institutions./span>
/span>
Organizational Change/span>
q
q
Changes in the “deep structure,” such as power relations, work-family
balance, instrumentality, etc.
Accountability to client constituency/span>
A mixture of organizational development, pressure from internal and external
constituencies, management support, gender training /span>
This is the “informal architecture” required to change institutions.
This approach risks creating a black hole of organizational change processes
in which gender may be lost. /span>
/span>
Institutional Change for Gender Equality/span>
Changes in social institutions as seen in families, communities, markets and
the state./span>
Gender analysis of the institutions relevant to the organization's program,
developing programs and processes to challenge these institutional norms,
changing reward structures, building organizational capacity /span>
This approach grounds the change effort in the work and maintains the focus
where it should be.
Difficult to sustain without strong external pressure and high commitment
from within the organization./span>
/span>
1.
Gender Infrastructure:
Current thinking sees the basics of gender equality as :
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (12 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
13. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
q
q
q
q
q
q
a gender policy that commits the organization to a particular path in
working on equality;
a gender unit of technically-skilled change agents that can ensure that
organizational programs do not disadvantage women and that holds
the organization to its policy commitments;
gender training and tools;
family-friendly policies, such as flex-time and day-care, that make it
possible for women in particular to balance work and family
responsibilities;
an increase in the number of women staff and managers;
an increase in resources devoted to women's programming.
Typically, the infrastructure described above is gained through
lobbying, pressure from clients, donors and/or internal staff groups
and requires some degree of management support. The case is
generally argued either on the grounds of rights (appealing to
international agreements such as CEDAW and the Beijing Platform for
Action) or of efficiency. For example, a study demonstrating the
economic advantages of women's education is credited with
considerable movement towards the use of World Bank resources for
women's programming.
An UNRISD study found that the extent to which an organization will
build and use such an infrastructure is dependent on three factors:
degree of responsiveness to external pressures; organizational
mandate; ideology and procedures; and the existence and capacity of
internal policy advocates and entrepreneurs.
A recent Norwegian government-sponsored study found that gender
units are usually under-resourced and in low status locations in their
organizations; they also enjoy little influence. According to this study,
even if gains are made at headquarters, work at the country level is
often quite weak.
However, gender units have made important gains in a number of
organizations in developing tools, doing gender training and
inexorably bringing gender-equity considerations to the organization
table. For example, in the ten years following its inception, the
Gender and Development Unit (GADU) at Oxfam GB developed
networks; sensitized staff through gender training; assisted with the
development of national and regional policies; included gender
considerations in job descriptions, grant requests, procedures and
guidelines; initiated a publishing program; and developed an
organizational gender policy ultimately passed by the Oxfam trustees.
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (13 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
14. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
Although GADU put the concept of gender firmly on the map at Oxfam,
its work was not without resistance and contention. (See Gender
Works, Oxfam GB, 1999 for more details.)
However, infrastructure alone is seldom sufficient to enable an
organization to challenge institutional /societal norms. A systematic
effort of organizational change is also required.
1.
Organizational Change:
Changes that build the organization's capacity to challenge genderbiased institutions in the society include: democratizing relations;
making women's voices more powerful in the organization; finding
ways to make the organization more accountable to women clients,
and more amenable to women's participation; and building relations
with other organizations to further a gender-equality agenda.
The concept of organizational change has received much attention in
the past 30 years or so. In 1969, in a groundbreaking study, Graham
Allison analyzed the political and organizational dynamics of the US
government and the US Navy with regard to the Cuban missile crisis.
Allison found that the strategic choices made were understandable
given the costs and benefits of the available strategic options.
However, a much deeper understanding of the actions of the
government and the Navy was revealed by an analysis of their
“organizational process” and “bureaucratic politics”. Looking at
organizational process alerts us to the fact that organizations are
constrained by their current capabilities, knowledge, and procedures:
limited flexibility because of a continual flow of work and issues; and
entrenched agreements that determine how resources are shared and
used. The bureaucratic politics analysis reveals an organization that is
a not a monolithic entity, but rather numerous interests and coalitions
competing to determine outcomes in the interest (altruistic or selfish)
of key players.
Some time later, Noel Tichy developed a similar framework for
thinking about strategic change. He suggested we look at:
q
Who influences whom and about what? This question relates to power,
resource allocation, and who reaps the benefits-i.e. The Political Point
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (14 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
15. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
q
q
of View on an organization.
How are resources allocated? This question relates to how social,
technical and financial resources are organized to produce desired
outputs in the most efficient manner-i.e. the Technical Point of View
on an organization.
Who talks to whom about what? This question relates to the relations
network, values, standards, beliefs and interpretations of staff-, i.e.
the Cultural Point of View on an organization.
Looking at the two frameworks developed by Allison and Tichy enables
us to understand why change can be so difficult if only a single path is
taken. Changing organizations requires:
q
q
q
q
new information and cognitive frameworks to enable different choices
to be made , i.e. Rational Analysis;
a new political alignment so that new issues make it on to the agenda, i.
e. Bureaucratic Politics;
new work practices and an increase in capacity, i.e. Organizational
Process; and
an organizational learning process that will integrate these threads and
help members learn what is required.
Much of the work on organizational change for gender equality has
adapted practices of organizational development and organizational
learning, particularly with regard to the importance of the learning
process and of participation. However, unlike traditional
organizational development, gender-equality organizational change
holds that rational analysis and bureaucratic politics are equally
important to the change process. The challenge is to develop methods
that combine politics and participation with an understanding of
organizations in terms of their equality mission. For many
practitioners this entails linking organizational and feminist theory.
Three such recent efforts at organizational change are instructive.
BRAC is a large rural development NGO in Bangladesh. The Gender
Team was charged with leading a long-term effort to improve gender
equality both within BRAC and in the provision of services to poor
rural women in Bangladesh. Changing organizational norms, systems,
and relationships was critical to the change effort. The process had
three broad stages:
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (15 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
16. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
q
q
q
q
q
Start-up: This comprised clarifying management interest, finding resources,
and negotiating the essential elements of the process and the establishment
of the Gender Team.
Needs Assessment and Knowledge Building: This participatory process
involved more than 400 BRAC staff at all levels in 2-day workshops to assess
gender issues in both BRAC and BRAC's programs.
Strategic Planning: The team met with the senior management team to
discuss the results of the needs assessment. The resultant process design
evolved through further management discussions. Approval was given for
the program design and an action-learning approach involving local area staff
first, in a collaborative analysis of the gender dimensions of their work, and
then in planning action to strengthen gender equality.
Training of trainers and micro-design of the program: A core group of 25
facilitators (now nearly 50) was developed to work with area-office staff to
facilitate the action-learning process. The training of trainers was used to
test and refine the program design; a pilot was then launched in which new
facilitators worked with Gender Team members to begin to deliver the
program in area offices.
Implementation: The facilitators worked in area offices to lead staff through
learning, analysis and action planning. Area-office teams developed analyses
of gender issues in their settings and in programs, and developed local
solutions. Area managers met to consider issues that seemed beyond the
capacity of local staff. After two years, the most important outcomes were
democratization of BRAC, and changes in relationships between women and
men and between levels of the hierarchy. The program is now in its eighth
year. (For a more complete description, see Rao, Stuart and Kelleher, 1999).
CIMMYT (Centro International de Mejoraramiento de Maiz y Trigo):
CIMMYT is a center of the Consultative Group on International
Agricultural Research system, focusing on plant breeding,
documentation, and distribution of wheat and maize. In order to
attract and retain the highest-caliber scientists, CIMMYT committed
itself to building a work environment that is equally hospitable to men
and women. The change process was aided by an internal
constituency of women and by positive funding incentives from
donors. The process involved:
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (16 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
17. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
1. Project set-up: An external action-research team was set up, a process
was agreed to, and key project values were affirmed: collaboration,
inclusion of diverse groups, and wide participation of staff. These
values reflected a way of working that was intrinsic to a genderequitable work environment. A key aim of the change process was
the “dual agenda”, not only more gender-equitable organization but
also more effective organization as a whole.
1. Inquiry: The external research team interviewed some 60 staff and
spouses, and held 5 focus groups. The interviews were structured
within a carefully developed conceptual framework, including
questions not only about the gendered aspects of the organization but
also about the strategic issues facing the center.
1. Analysis: After some discussion with CIMMYT staff, the action-research
team developed an analysis that included a description of the current
work environment and the “mental models” that drove it and strategic
challenges facing CIMMYT, and the implications of these challenges for
both gender equality and organizational effectiveness.
1. Feedback: A series of meetings at CIMMYT, including all staff and a
number of spouses, discussed the ways in which the mental models
that drove the organization were problematic in terms of both gender
equality and organizational effectiveness. The staff then developed a
number of concrete action steps (experiments).
1. Implementation: Staff volunteered to lead teams that would
implement these experiments, which focused on building participation,
strengthening communication between managers and staff, and
creating a system of management accountability to staff. After two
years, there was significant progress in improving the transparency,
fairness and gender neutrality of the hiring system, improved
communication, and improved quality of interaction in key project
planning teams. Several issues remained unresolved, but significant
steps had been taken. (For more information on this case, see Rao,
Stuart and Kelleher, 1999 or Center for Gender in Organizations,
Simmons Graduate School of Management, Working Paper #3,
“Engendering Organizational Change”, Merrill-Sands et al., 1999.)
Novib's Gender Route Project
In the dialogue among Novib (a Dutch funding agency now part of the
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (17 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
18. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
Oxfam group) and its partner organizations, it became increasingly
clear that all needed much more knowledge on gender issues and
change processes within organizations. The Gender Route project was
initiated to provide this learning and to improve the capacity of the
participating organizations. The project was originally to last three
years, but was extended to five years beginning in 1995.
All 31, non-women specific participating organizations had had a long
relationship with Novib; they were based in Asia, Africa, or Latin
America, plus two global networks and Novib. Each drew up its
learning goals in advance and completed a self-diagnosis,
implementation and evaluation.
Â
Important elements of all phases included:
q
q
q
Funds and expertise (local gender consultants) made available by
Novib for all project-related activities;
Agreements on the submission of regular progress reports;
Annual workshops organized by Novib for each region/continent,
during which participants and Novib exchanged experiences and
reported on progress. The workshops often also included a training
element, on such subjects as the role of change agents or gendersensitive PMES.
Phase 1: Self-diagnosis
As a start, all partners and Novib assessed the extent gender equity
was part of their policy and practice. In order to do this, the “9 boxes
framework” model for self-diagnosis was introduced. This framework
identifies three crucial elements of an organization: mission/mandate,
organizational structure, and human resources. It further
distinguishes among subsystems of an organization: technical,
political and cultural.
The technical subsystem organizes social, technical and financial
resources. The political subsystem allocates organizational power and
benefits, and determines who influences whom and about what. The
cultural subsystem comprises norms and values, relationship networks
and interpretations shared by all staff. For an organization to work
smoothly, the three crucial elements and three subsystems must be
aligned, not working at cross-purposes. In each of the 9 boxes of the
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (18 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
19. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
framework are questions that can be tailored to specific realities of an
organization. The advantage of this model is that it illustrates the
strong and weak parts of an organization at a glance.
The self-diagnosis pointed out that, many participant groups scored
most positively on their technical subsystems. Some were improving
at the political subsystem level (e.g. organizations had already
identified a problem with decision-making processes or lack of
democratic access to information). The elements least addressed
were elements of the cultural subsystem, at the deepest level of the
organization. These included such things as promotion of teamwork
and learning, promotion of non-sexist attitudes, and an assessment of
how staff experience the workplace.
Â
The Gender Route workshops concluded that technical measures alone
were hardly enough. Even organizations with gender focal points,
increased women staff members, more women's projects, and gender
training often failed to change organizational systems and processes.
On the political level, women staff members often had little influence
on formal and informal decision-making processes; women among the
beneficiaries continue to operate in traditional spheres; sexdisaggregated data on the conditions of men and women among the
target group fail to reach higher decision-making levels, and gender
focal points continue preaching to the converted. While such an
organization might look good at a first glance, the political and
cultural subsystems were preventing technical measures from
operating effectively. In other words, the subsystems were working
at cross-purposes.
Â
The Gender Route project helped participants to start identifying and
addressing these deep-seated processes that affect the organization's
ability to embed a gender perspective. Overtime, it became clear that
without addressing these issues, change would not be genuine.
Â
Phase 2: Action Plans
Based on the self-diagnosis, all participants designed and
implemented action plans. Along with common strategies such as
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (19 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
20. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
changing the gender infrastructure, providing staff gender training,
establishing gender PMES, and conducting gender-disaggregated
baseline studies, were less standard interventions. Participants
analyzed how male ways of behaving blocked gender equality both in
the workplace and in the field, male and female staff temporarily
swapped jobs, gender criteria were included in job-appraisal
interviews, men's and women's experiences of the workplace and
work arrangements were assessed, issues relating to sexual
harassment were included and staff members were trained in
counselling skills to deal with sexual harassment cases, the
undemocratic nature of decision-making processes and sharing of
information were addressed, and the structure of the organization was
changed in order to promote teamwork and learning.
Â
All regions showed a similar pattern regarding the choice of strategic
intervention. What difference there was seemed to be between
organizations that were more and less advanced in integrating a
gender perspective. Those opting for less common interventions also
seemed to be most advanced in their gender policy and practices.
Â
In some cases, where existing organizational problems surfaced, the
Gender Route Project work became closely linked with the need for
improved organizational performance. Individuals responsible for the
Gender Route Project (i.e., change agents) found they were dealing
with general organizational-change issues. In the workshops, a lot of
attention was paid to the crucial role of these change agents. The
broadening of the discussion to the “dual agenda” -- for equal rights
and opportunities for women and men and improved organizational
performance -- helped a number of organizations to take their gender
work to a higher level, facilitating an analysis of organizational
conditions and factors that enable or inhibit gender practices. This
renewed the creativity, curiosity and enthusiasm of both women and
men.
Â
Phase 3: Evaluation: Preliminary Conclusions
At the end of phase two, all partners had implemented their action
plans, developed by means of the diagnosis exercise. Although it was
too early to provide conclusive results in regard to long term
objectives, a number of elements were seen to have been crucial to
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (20 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
21. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
some participant's deep organizational change. These are:
q
q
q
q
Involved and committed senior management: Leadership must express
a need and willingness to learn and change their work practices, and to
create a work culture in which staff members can articulate and
express the need for change. In more hierarchical organizations where
there is little sharing of information and decisions are made by
leadership alone, this enabling environment is lacking. The importance
of leadership - both enabling and unsupportive - kept coming up in
workshops. For example, in the last South Asia workshop (in 1999),
much discussion centered on sustainability of the achievements made
through the gender route. Participants kept coming back to box 5 in
the Tichy model: the role of the decision-makers in sustaining the
learnings and translating them to higher quality of work.
Gender infrastructure: Regional workshops concluded that a gender
infrastructure is a must for sustainability. Organizations that had
`mainstreamed' gender issues, thereby doing away with gender focal
points, risked loosing the gender perspective; gender focal points
remain relevant it seems, but must be central and in all organizational
units.
A culture of gender equity: in recruitment, women in field-management
structures (which seems to be always possible if you try), and family
friendliness in work arrangements.
A culture of participation and consultation: This is necessary both at
organization and target-group level.
The three change efforts we have looked at - BRAC, CIMMYT and
NOVIB Gender Route share a basic organizational-development (OD)
approach to change. Information collection, analysis and action
planning are participatory; there is a focus on issues of
communications, relationships, and increasing equality of managers
and staff. Apart from the OD interventions were outcomes such as the
legitimization of gender issues, focus on hiring practices, equal pay for
equal work and male/female balance, and the building of gender
infrastructure such as the creation of specialist units. There are also
important differences between the three change efforts - action
learning at BRAC, the mental models and dual agenda at CIMMYT, and
the 9 Box Framework and the support of other organizations in the
NOVIB program.
Although these interventions also focused on the programs of the
organization many OD interventions focus solely on organizational
processes. In such cases, efforts to promote gender equality in
beneficiary communities is lost. Thus, the process must include an
explicit focus on institutional change.
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (21 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
22. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
1. Institutional Change for Gender Equality:
Institutional change involves changes in strategy and programs. The
question becomes, does the program focus on changing social
institutions -- families, communities, markets and the state? In other
words, will the program challenge gender-biased norms throughout
society and work to upgrade women's position and voice, not merely
their material condition. In order to answer “yes,” the organization's
mission, processes and programs may have to change in ways that
challenge and alter institutional norms. Such an agenda will be driven
as much by women clients or women at the grassroots as by the
organization.
Our thinking on “institutional change” is very much influenced by the
work of Molyneux and of Kabeer. Kabeer poses the question of
institutional change as follows:
gender as a power relation derives from institutional arrangements
which provide men, of a given social group, with greater capacity than
women from the group to mobilize institutional rules and resources to
promote and defend their strategic interests. In most contexts, men
enjoy, by and large, greater access to food, political position or land,
greater physical mobility, lesser responsibilities in terms of self
maintenance or care of the young and the old, a privileged position in
command of labor, particularly women's labor, less confined sexuality. â
¦The different gender interests of men and women derive out of their
positioning within these unequal social relations and shape their
attitudes to change.
Molyneux's analysis of strategic interests and practical needs is vital
here. Women's strategic interests enhance women's power of choice
over politics, reproduction, work, and income. In order to change
institutions, interventions must focus on women's strategic interests.
For example, BRAC, in Bangladesh realized that many of their women
members were suffering from illegal divorces or inheritance disputes.
They therefore initiated a para-legal training program that taught
women to understand their rights and how to claim them. GRAM, in
South India, changed from initiating to supporting the agenda
increasingly voiced by their dalit women members. IBAM, in Brazil,
developed a training process for women candidates in municipal
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (22 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
23. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
elections.
However, to work on strategic interests as well practical needs, an
organization must accept three primary facts:
q
q
q
The program needs to challenge the basis of women's
disempowerment;
The women intended to benefit from the program must be involved in
its definition. (This involves freeing time and space for their
participation.); and
The resistance to these changes can be powerful. Working on strategic
needs builds strength through accessing resources, building awareness
and alliances, and mobilizing around self-identified needs and
priorities.
The work begins with a gender analysis of the organization's programs:
q
q
q
q
q
q
Does the program focus on strategic interests or only on practical
needs?
Who was involved in identifying both goals and delivery mechanisms?
Does the program challenge existing power relations between men and
women?
What resistance can be anticipated and how can it be countered?
Does the program allow women to choose social roles other than those
of wife and homemaker?
Does the program focus on the empowerment of women?
This gender analysis leads to work with women's groups; building
alliances within the organization, and a participative design process
that identifies opportunities and plans for resistance, and puts in place
necessary resources and infrastructure.
One final note: this section has identified three main components of
the process of institutional change: building a gender infrastructure,
organizational change, and planning for institutional change.
Although we have discussed them sequentially, they are not
necessarily followed in order, as each organization has a unique
cultural and temporal context.
V. Weaving New Institutional Rules for Gender Equality
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (23 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
24. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
The work of organizational change for gender equality is propelled by
an understanding of the large picture (as described at the beginning of
this paper), and an intention to positively impact women's lives; but
this connection often gets lost along the way. Re-focusing
organizational efforts on institutional change addresses this
unintended de-linking. While global, regional and national trends
shape local realities and choices for interventions, interventions are
often designed as if organizations exist in a contextual vacuum.
The gender and organizational change intervention at PALM
Foundation, in Sri Lanka (supported by the Novib Gender Route) is a
case in point. PALM works to establish and develop people's
organizations in tea plantations in the central region of Sri Lanka and
the surrounding villages. The plantation workers are from the Tamil
ethnic minority, whose brethren have been waging a civil war in
northern Sri Lanka for the past two decades; the plantations are half
owned and fully managed by a transnational corporation
headquartered in the west. Tea prices have fared badly on the
commodity market in the last few years. PALM provides a variety of
welfare activities, such as health and education facilities, but only with
management's 'good will.' Labour unions are prohibited on plantations
though legal under Sri Lanka's constitution. (One quarter of its 6.8
million labor force is unionized.) Gender hierarchies ensure that
plantation women suffer not only extreme isolation, but also material
deprivation and economic and social discrimination. Global and local
factors complicate and nuance their situation, and PALM staff have a
sophisticated understanding of them; yet this did not come to the
design of PALM's gender and organizational intervention. Instead, the
effort focused simply on hiring more women and creating a more
'gender-sensitive' culture within PALM.
What was missing in the PALM intervention was the understanding
that work at the level of organizations and groups of organizations
needs to be nourished by knowledge that elucidates both gender
perspectives and the larger contexts: development and economic
globalization, human rights, and human security. Making this
connection between gender and these broader issues will enable
change agents to 'see' issues (especially discriminatory institutional
rules and the factors that perpetuate them) in both contexts.
Cooperinder suggests that this “sensemaking” â ¦sets the frame for
decision-making, becomes the basis for envisioning possible futures,
and creates the communication context for linking with others. To
facilitate “sensemaking,” we need to build better connections
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (24 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
25. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
between organizational change activists, macro policy analysts, and
women and men in communities. This work is challenging, as
organizational interventions for change remain poorly understood and
undervalued. Because of the persistent erroneous belief that if we get
the policy right, implementation will inevitably follow, institutional
analysis and change through organizational interventions are often
inadequate.
An institutional change approach (as opposed to mainstreaming or
simple organizational change) encourages us to make strategic links
to larger economic, political and social conditions shaping women's
and men's lives. It also directs our interventions to changing the
material and relational hierarchies that define them. It involves
searching for collaborators (outside the traditional development
NGOs) that work at the community level. These collaborators are in
the best position to help us understand institutional factors that shape
gender relations, highlight innovative structures and processes and,
where relevant, to understand the links to research.
That there are many examples to draw from, we have no doubt.
Powerful actors, firmly grounded in local realities, straddle the macromicro divide with ease. As described by Batliwala, such organizations
as WEIGO and Shack Dwellers International have “created new forms
of partnership between grassroots actors and NGOs, other private and
public institutions, scholars and researchers, and state and
multilateral agencies.” (Batliwala, 2002). They are reshaping macro
discourses, from informal sector employment to water sharing to slum
development and equally important, they are developing practical
solutions for women's material welfare and empowerment.
Supportive discourses and supporting change agents are critical to
change. Gender and institutional change activists must create
partnerships with grassroots and community-based organizations to
highlight creative solutions, find ways to support strategic-change
work, build new knowledge rooted in on-the-ground experience, and
develop innovative ways of learning and networking this new
knowledge. An institutional-change approach forces us to strategize
for change by analyzing the connections between the global and the
local context to “[get] institutions right for women in development.”
Supriya Roy Chowdhury suggests, that that sometimes necessitates
getting out of the organizational box and addressing deeper sources of
powerlessness through movement struggles.
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (25 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
26. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
Where the structural inhibitors to women's ability to negotiate
gender interests and identities are so severely handicapped by
organizational frameworks we must look to other possibilities of
addressing issues of justice and equality.
Endnotes
Institutionalizing Gender Equality (Royal Tropical Institute and Oxfam GB, 2000).
This definition draws on Joan Scott, “Gender as a Useful Category of Historical
Analysis” in A. Rao (editor), Women's Studies International: Nairobi and Beyond,
New York: The Feminist Press, 1991.
Geoff Wood, “Social Dimensions of Governance”, World Bank/Bangladesh
National Institutional Review, World Bank, mimeo.
Shubh Kumar-Range, Like Paddy in Rock: Local Institutions and Gender Roles in
Kolli Hills (MS Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, 2001).
Goetz Anne Marie, Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development, London:
Zed Books, 1997
Rao, Aruna, Rieky Stuart and David Kelleher, Gender at Work, Kumarian Press,
1999
Lipman-Blumen, The Connective Edge, Itzin and Newman, Gender and
Organizational Change
UNRISD, Gender Mainstreaming: A Study of Efforts by the UNDP, the World Bank
and the ILO to Institutional Gender Issues available at www.undp.org/gender.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, WID/Gender Units and the Experience of
Mainstreaming in Multilateral Organizations, available at: www.odin.dep.no/ud/
englesk/publ.
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (26 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM
27. Unravelling Institutionalized Gender Inequality
Novib has adapted the Tichy framework for use in analyzing organizations from a
gender equality standpoint. A summary of this adaptation can be found at www.
genderatwork.org.
The section is excerpted from a program description written by Irma Van Dueren
for www.Gender@work.org, 2001.
This framework is based on the work of Noel Tichy discussed earlier. A
description of the 9 Boxes Model is available at www.genderatwork.org.
Kabeer, Naila, Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought,
London: Verso, 1994.
Kabeer, p.311.
For more details see “En Route: Evaluation of the Gender Route Project Novib”,
Novib, October 2001.
Cooperrider, D. Dutton, J., Organizational Dimensions of Global Change,
London: Sage, 2000.
Srilatha Batliwala, “Grassroots Movements and International Public Policy”,
Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University, March 2002;
forthcoming in Voluntas, International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit
Organizations.
Women in the Informal Economy Globalizing and Organizing (www.wiego.org)
Anne Marie Goetz, op.cit.
See Supriya Roy Chowdhury, “Behind every successful woman”, on women's
experience in the panchayat system in Karnataka, Insight essay, The Hindu, New
Delhi, April 21, 2002.
* This work was supported in part by the Canadian International Development
Agency (CIDA).
http://www.awid.org/publications/OccasionalPapers/Unravelling_Inst_Gender_Inequal.html (27 van 28)5/4/2006 1:16:29 PM