Annual
Monitoring of
GEF IW Projects
GEF IW Task Force
M&E Framework as
June 1, 2006
applied to
Self-Assessment
Cumulative Coverage
by UNOPS PCU, as of June 2007*
• 433 (217) people from 70+ GEF-beneficiary countries across 40+ GEF IW projects
participated in Structured Learning activities, including __% (__%) women and __% (__%)
men -- since 1998 (more than 50% since July 2006more than 50% since July 2006)
• 291 participants in 3rd
IW Conference, of which 20% female,
63% from GEF IW beneficiary nations, and 52% from the Americas.
• 206 (206) registered participants for 4th
IW Conference, of which ___% female, __% from
beneficiary nations, and __% from Africa.
• (Also 48 sponsored participants from 34 beneficiary nations)
• ~140 people and 57+ GEF projects receive GEF IW Bridges newsletters via direct mailing.
…
• Gender & Water Exhibit toured 24 nations, and featured at over 20 regional or international
meetings as well as local events in 5 GEF regions.
• 13 IW Experience Notes from 10 GEF IW projects now posted on iwlearn.net, others drafted.
• LME Video seen by 108 nations’ Ministry representatives at GPA IGR-2
* Numbers in parenthesis represent only data for July 2006 to present (June 1 2007), during
there existed ~75 active GEF IW projects involving XXX countries.
Outcomes
(Catalytic Impacts)
According to MTE Report, stakeholder interviews indicate “satisfactory”
delivery of outcomes for all but 1 project component, as of end 2006:
A. Information Sharing: >75% projects use IW-IMS and >50% of users
obtain needed info by 2008.
B. Structured Learning: 30+ projects apply lessons from IW:LEARN
structured learning to improve TWM in the basins by 2008.
C. IW Conferences: Representatives from all GEF IW projects participate
in 2 portfolio-wide review, replication and partnership events
D. Testing Innovative Approaches: GEF IW projects and partners benefit
from a set of demonstration activities integrating TWM information
sharing and structured learning.
E. Partnerships to Sustain Benefits: TWM structured learning and
information sharing institutionalized. [Marginally Unsatisfactory.]
Need to supplement interviews with “hard data” as input to TE (2008)
Other “Catalytic Impacts”
2007 Anecdotes
– Participation Activity: led to new Coke-ELI partnership to promote stakeholder involvement
in local-level source water protection in Africa.
– LME Video: translated by GPA and partners into Chinese, key component of “LME
Educational Packet” being developed by NOAA and partners in 3Q 2007.
2006 Anecdotes
– IW Communications Manual drafted by and for GEF IW projects
– 21 Newport workshop participants provide recommendations to 10 LMEs to improve governance and socioeconomics.
– ELI obtained external finance to deliver P2 for water mgmt. training in LAC and WWF4 session on P2 in IW mgmt.
– LME governance workshop participants carry over XXXX recommendations back to their home projects.
– G&WA partners foster and sustain Gender & Water exhibit tour in LAC region
2005 Anecdotes
– 50 useful, measurable actions planned by St. Petersburg workshop participants
– UNECE Water Convention contributes to Petersberg/Athens Process to improve IWRM
– IWC3 participants felt learning would improve their projects' design, implementation, communications, inter-project linkages and
integration.
– Gender, Water and Climate exhibit deployed (via co-finance)
– Jobs@iwlearn.net helping to link projects with professional personnel
Outputs
(Progress by Component)
• Based on Project Timeline in IW:LEARN Project
Document
• Accomplished (in full) by end of target year
– Fully accomplished since target year.
• Partially accomplished by end of target year
– Ongoing, expected accomplishment by end of target year.
• Not accomplished by end of target year
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
B. Structured Learning: 30+ projects apply lessons from IW:LEARN
structured learning to improve TWM in the basins by 2008.
B1. Regional Multi-
Project Exchanges
At least 1 regional exchange
launched (Europe)
At least 2 regional
exchanges launched
(Caribbean)
At least 3 regional
exchanges launched
(Africa); Present
regional exchange
findings at IWC4
Learning products on
IW-IMS
B2. Learning for
Portfolio Subsets
Freshwater &/or LMEs
exchanges launched
Freshwater & LME
exchanges both launched
(or continuing)
Coral reef exchange
launched; other
exchanges present
findings at IWC4
Learning products on
IW-IMS
B3. Inter-Project
Exchange Missions
1-4 multi-week
inter-project exchanges
1-4 multi-week
inter-project exchanges
1-4 multi-week
inter-project
exchanges
1-4 multi-week
inter-project
exchanges
B4. Public
Participation
Training
Training materials developed 1st
workshop; training
materials revised
2nd
workshop;
training materials
augmented
3rd
workshop;
training materials on
IW-IMS
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
C. IW Conferences: Representatives from all GEF IW projects participate
in 2 portfolio-wide review, replication and partnership events.
C1. IWC3 (Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil)
IWC3 held; IW portfolio
recommendations to CSD
Proceedings disseminated
via IW-IMS
C2. IWC4 (Cape
Town, South Africa)
IWC4 host, location and co-
finance secured; agenda set
IWC4 held Proceedings
disseminated
via IW-IMS
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
D. Testing Innovative Approaches: GEF IW projects and partners benefit from a set of
demonstration activities integrating TWM information sharing and structured learning.
D2. Southeastern
Europe/Mediterrane
an
3 roundtables for senior
officials and experts;
regional TWM information
exchange network launched
via Internet
3 roundtables for senior
officials and experts;
network sustained via
regional partners
Network and learning products accessible via
IW-IMS
D3. CSD/GEF
Roundtable with
CSD
Global roundtable, in follow-
up to CSD-12 (and leading
up to CSD-13)
Learning products accessible via IW-IMS
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
E. Partnerships to Sustain Benefits: TWM structured learning and
information sharing institutionalized.
E1. Partnerships
and Strategic Plan
Initial sustainability plan
finalized and approved by
IW:LEARN SC; role for
partners in sustainability
plan finalized, approved
Partners recruited and
aligned to sustain
IW:LEARN benefits for all
activities per plan.
Sustainability plan
revised per mid-term
review
Sustainability plan
realized through
partners strategic
plans.
E2. IW
Contributions to
Global TWM
2-3 projects receive cost
share to participate each of
in 2 GEF IW side events; 1-2
outreach &/or learning
products disseminated,
including LME video (co-
produced by IW:LEARN)
2-3 projects receive cost
share to participate in each
of 2 GEF IW side events; 1-
2 outreach &/or learning
products disseminated,
including Gender and Water
exhibit
2-3 projects receive
cost share to
participate in 1-2
GEF IW side
events; 1-2 outreach
&/or learning
products
disseminated
2-3 projects receive
cost share to
participate in each of
2 GEF IW side
events; 1-2 outreach
&/or learning
products
disseminated
UNOPS 2007 Progress
Highlights of UNOPS IW:LEARN PCU progress in Q1 and Q2 of 2007 include –
• B1: Identified local partner and venue for 2nd
Africa workshop (mid-Nov. in Maseru,
Lesotho); consulted w/UNEP-IW:LEARN re: Caribbean plans
• B2: Recruited LME EV Workshop lead & developed agenda (July in CT)
• B3: Conducted groundwater exchange for 9 face-to-face participants from 3 projects
(with 1 additional project, Nubian, participating virtually); posted blog & results to
iwlearn.net
• B4: posted Montevideo workshop results; drafted revised agenda and started
identifying participants (see B1 for Africa) for 2nd
PP workshop
• C2: Set IWC4 agenda, sent over 250 invites and secured venue
• D2: Planning underway for 3rd
Petersberg-Athens Roundtable (mid-Nov.)
• E1: Began drafting Sustainability Plan + PIF for potential IW:LEARN “integration
phase;” designed session in IWC4 agenda to identify projects’ outstanding learning
needs for future IW:LEARN interventions; planning SC meeting on sustainability
• E2:
– Oversaw drafting of 1 new GEF IW Bridges issue (for June publication) and
several new IW Experience Notes (for distribution at IWC4)
– Identified topics for IWC4 issue of GEF IW Bridges
UNOPS-IW:LEARN Disbursement,
by Component
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
2004Q4 2005 2006 2007
est.
2008
Q1-Q3
est.
B
C
D
E
PCU
Recent IW:LEARN partners …
Name of Co-
financier (source)
Classification Type Amount
(US$)
Status*
IBRD-WBI Multi-Laterals Cash 100,000
IBRD-WBI Multi-Laterals In-Kind 410,000
UNDP Cap-Net UN Agency In-Kind 1,400,000
UNEP-DEWA**
UN Agency In-Kind
and/or
Cash
1,207,400
UNDP-EEG UN Agency In-Kind 230,000
USA-NOAA Government In-Kind 200,000
ELI NGO In-Kind 300,000
IUCN-WANI NGO In-Kind $350,000
IUCN-GMP NGO In-Kind $300,000
GWP NGO In-Kind $100,000
GWP NGO In-Kind $90,000
Co-finance1 95,000
46,000
0
157,000
0
290,000
174,000
458,000
77,500
0
0
Co-finance2
Name of Co-
financier (source)
Classification Type Amount
(US$)
Status*
GETF NGO Cash &
In-Kind
$355,000 137,000
SEA-START RC
Chulalongkorn U.**
NGO In-Kind 290,400
UNECE UN Agency In-Kind 225,000
38,600
UNESCO-IHP
ISARM/IGRAC
UN Agency In-Kind 30,000
Germany-
MoE
Government In-Kind
150,000
131,537
Greece-MoFA Government In-Kind
150,000
GWP-Med NGO In-Kind 20,000 30,000
LakeNET NGO In-Kind 48,000
EcoAfrica NGO In-Kind 170,000
39,000
(TBD)
(TBD)
(TBD)
(TBD)
Unexpected Cofinance
• E2: IISD/IIED/Environment Canada: $3035 (cash) in
2006
• E2; Boston University: $2000 (in-kind) in 2006
• B1: CTC-St. Petersburg : $650 (in-kind) in 2005
• A1: Transnatura, LLP: $525 (in-kind) in 2005
• TOTAL unexpected: >$6,000
(+ UNESCO-Montevideo, IAEA, and USGS amounts TBD)

UNOPS IW:LEARN Progress as of June 1, 2007

  • 1.
    Annual Monitoring of GEF IWProjects GEF IW Task Force M&E Framework as June 1, 2006 applied to Self-Assessment
  • 2.
    Cumulative Coverage by UNOPSPCU, as of June 2007* • 433 (217) people from 70+ GEF-beneficiary countries across 40+ GEF IW projects participated in Structured Learning activities, including __% (__%) women and __% (__%) men -- since 1998 (more than 50% since July 2006more than 50% since July 2006) • 291 participants in 3rd IW Conference, of which 20% female, 63% from GEF IW beneficiary nations, and 52% from the Americas. • 206 (206) registered participants for 4th IW Conference, of which ___% female, __% from beneficiary nations, and __% from Africa. • (Also 48 sponsored participants from 34 beneficiary nations) • ~140 people and 57+ GEF projects receive GEF IW Bridges newsletters via direct mailing. … • Gender & Water Exhibit toured 24 nations, and featured at over 20 regional or international meetings as well as local events in 5 GEF regions. • 13 IW Experience Notes from 10 GEF IW projects now posted on iwlearn.net, others drafted. • LME Video seen by 108 nations’ Ministry representatives at GPA IGR-2 * Numbers in parenthesis represent only data for July 2006 to present (June 1 2007), during there existed ~75 active GEF IW projects involving XXX countries.
  • 3.
    Outcomes (Catalytic Impacts) According toMTE Report, stakeholder interviews indicate “satisfactory” delivery of outcomes for all but 1 project component, as of end 2006: A. Information Sharing: >75% projects use IW-IMS and >50% of users obtain needed info by 2008. B. Structured Learning: 30+ projects apply lessons from IW:LEARN structured learning to improve TWM in the basins by 2008. C. IW Conferences: Representatives from all GEF IW projects participate in 2 portfolio-wide review, replication and partnership events D. Testing Innovative Approaches: GEF IW projects and partners benefit from a set of demonstration activities integrating TWM information sharing and structured learning. E. Partnerships to Sustain Benefits: TWM structured learning and information sharing institutionalized. [Marginally Unsatisfactory.] Need to supplement interviews with “hard data” as input to TE (2008)
  • 4.
    Other “Catalytic Impacts” 2007Anecdotes – Participation Activity: led to new Coke-ELI partnership to promote stakeholder involvement in local-level source water protection in Africa. – LME Video: translated by GPA and partners into Chinese, key component of “LME Educational Packet” being developed by NOAA and partners in 3Q 2007. 2006 Anecdotes – IW Communications Manual drafted by and for GEF IW projects – 21 Newport workshop participants provide recommendations to 10 LMEs to improve governance and socioeconomics. – ELI obtained external finance to deliver P2 for water mgmt. training in LAC and WWF4 session on P2 in IW mgmt. – LME governance workshop participants carry over XXXX recommendations back to their home projects. – G&WA partners foster and sustain Gender & Water exhibit tour in LAC region 2005 Anecdotes – 50 useful, measurable actions planned by St. Petersburg workshop participants – UNECE Water Convention contributes to Petersberg/Athens Process to improve IWRM – IWC3 participants felt learning would improve their projects' design, implementation, communications, inter-project linkages and integration. – Gender, Water and Climate exhibit deployed (via co-finance) – Jobs@iwlearn.net helping to link projects with professional personnel
  • 6.
    Outputs (Progress by Component) •Based on Project Timeline in IW:LEARN Project Document • Accomplished (in full) by end of target year – Fully accomplished since target year. • Partially accomplished by end of target year – Ongoing, expected accomplishment by end of target year. • Not accomplished by end of target year
  • 7.
    Year 1 Year2 Year 3 Year 4 B. Structured Learning: 30+ projects apply lessons from IW:LEARN structured learning to improve TWM in the basins by 2008. B1. Regional Multi- Project Exchanges At least 1 regional exchange launched (Europe) At least 2 regional exchanges launched (Caribbean) At least 3 regional exchanges launched (Africa); Present regional exchange findings at IWC4 Learning products on IW-IMS B2. Learning for Portfolio Subsets Freshwater &/or LMEs exchanges launched Freshwater & LME exchanges both launched (or continuing) Coral reef exchange launched; other exchanges present findings at IWC4 Learning products on IW-IMS B3. Inter-Project Exchange Missions 1-4 multi-week inter-project exchanges 1-4 multi-week inter-project exchanges 1-4 multi-week inter-project exchanges 1-4 multi-week inter-project exchanges B4. Public Participation Training Training materials developed 1st workshop; training materials revised 2nd workshop; training materials augmented 3rd workshop; training materials on IW-IMS
  • 8.
    Year 1 Year2 Year 3 Year 4 C. IW Conferences: Representatives from all GEF IW projects participate in 2 portfolio-wide review, replication and partnership events. C1. IWC3 (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) IWC3 held; IW portfolio recommendations to CSD Proceedings disseminated via IW-IMS C2. IWC4 (Cape Town, South Africa) IWC4 host, location and co- finance secured; agenda set IWC4 held Proceedings disseminated via IW-IMS
  • 9.
    Year 1 Year2 Year 3 Year 4 D. Testing Innovative Approaches: GEF IW projects and partners benefit from a set of demonstration activities integrating TWM information sharing and structured learning. D2. Southeastern Europe/Mediterrane an 3 roundtables for senior officials and experts; regional TWM information exchange network launched via Internet 3 roundtables for senior officials and experts; network sustained via regional partners Network and learning products accessible via IW-IMS D3. CSD/GEF Roundtable with CSD Global roundtable, in follow- up to CSD-12 (and leading up to CSD-13) Learning products accessible via IW-IMS
  • 10.
    Year 1 Year2 Year 3 Year 4 E. Partnerships to Sustain Benefits: TWM structured learning and information sharing institutionalized. E1. Partnerships and Strategic Plan Initial sustainability plan finalized and approved by IW:LEARN SC; role for partners in sustainability plan finalized, approved Partners recruited and aligned to sustain IW:LEARN benefits for all activities per plan. Sustainability plan revised per mid-term review Sustainability plan realized through partners strategic plans. E2. IW Contributions to Global TWM 2-3 projects receive cost share to participate each of in 2 GEF IW side events; 1-2 outreach &/or learning products disseminated, including LME video (co- produced by IW:LEARN) 2-3 projects receive cost share to participate in each of 2 GEF IW side events; 1- 2 outreach &/or learning products disseminated, including Gender and Water exhibit 2-3 projects receive cost share to participate in 1-2 GEF IW side events; 1-2 outreach &/or learning products disseminated 2-3 projects receive cost share to participate in each of 2 GEF IW side events; 1-2 outreach &/or learning products disseminated
  • 11.
    UNOPS 2007 Progress Highlightsof UNOPS IW:LEARN PCU progress in Q1 and Q2 of 2007 include – • B1: Identified local partner and venue for 2nd Africa workshop (mid-Nov. in Maseru, Lesotho); consulted w/UNEP-IW:LEARN re: Caribbean plans • B2: Recruited LME EV Workshop lead & developed agenda (July in CT) • B3: Conducted groundwater exchange for 9 face-to-face participants from 3 projects (with 1 additional project, Nubian, participating virtually); posted blog & results to iwlearn.net • B4: posted Montevideo workshop results; drafted revised agenda and started identifying participants (see B1 for Africa) for 2nd PP workshop • C2: Set IWC4 agenda, sent over 250 invites and secured venue • D2: Planning underway for 3rd Petersberg-Athens Roundtable (mid-Nov.) • E1: Began drafting Sustainability Plan + PIF for potential IW:LEARN “integration phase;” designed session in IWC4 agenda to identify projects’ outstanding learning needs for future IW:LEARN interventions; planning SC meeting on sustainability • E2: – Oversaw drafting of 1 new GEF IW Bridges issue (for June publication) and several new IW Experience Notes (for distribution at IWC4) – Identified topics for IWC4 issue of GEF IW Bridges
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Name of Co- financier(source) Classification Type Amount (US$) Status* IBRD-WBI Multi-Laterals Cash 100,000 IBRD-WBI Multi-Laterals In-Kind 410,000 UNDP Cap-Net UN Agency In-Kind 1,400,000 UNEP-DEWA** UN Agency In-Kind and/or Cash 1,207,400 UNDP-EEG UN Agency In-Kind 230,000 USA-NOAA Government In-Kind 200,000 ELI NGO In-Kind 300,000 IUCN-WANI NGO In-Kind $350,000 IUCN-GMP NGO In-Kind $300,000 GWP NGO In-Kind $100,000 GWP NGO In-Kind $90,000 Co-finance1 95,000 46,000 0 157,000 0 290,000 174,000 458,000 77,500 0 0
  • 15.
    Co-finance2 Name of Co- financier(source) Classification Type Amount (US$) Status* GETF NGO Cash & In-Kind $355,000 137,000 SEA-START RC Chulalongkorn U.** NGO In-Kind 290,400 UNECE UN Agency In-Kind 225,000 38,600 UNESCO-IHP ISARM/IGRAC UN Agency In-Kind 30,000 Germany- MoE Government In-Kind 150,000 131,537 Greece-MoFA Government In-Kind 150,000 GWP-Med NGO In-Kind 20,000 30,000 LakeNET NGO In-Kind 48,000 EcoAfrica NGO In-Kind 170,000 39,000 (TBD) (TBD) (TBD) (TBD)
  • 16.
    Unexpected Cofinance • E2:IISD/IIED/Environment Canada: $3035 (cash) in 2006 • E2; Boston University: $2000 (in-kind) in 2006 • B1: CTC-St. Petersburg : $650 (in-kind) in 2005 • A1: Transnatura, LLP: $525 (in-kind) in 2005 • TOTAL unexpected: >$6,000 (+ UNESCO-Montevideo, IAEA, and USGS amounts TBD)

Editor's Notes

  • #3 Jul 2006-June 2007 participants include 42 ohrid, 43 NBO pan-africa,33 african fw ev, 39 lac p2, 18 IMS in NBO, est. of 18 for coral, 9 groundwater; NOT including Moldova
  • #14 Integrates real values from UNDP-IW:LEARN with ProDoc estimates for UNEP-IW:LEARN
  • #15 Add Brazilian Flag! Check that Hungarian Flah is correct (looks like Italian a bit)