This document discusses whether people should be judged according to their social roles and responsibilities. It presents scenarios about a Medieval Duke deciding whether to go to war in Jerusalem and a Western Army Officer in 1894 deciding whether to attack natives. It asks the reader to consider how Godfrey de Bouillon and John M. Chivington were judged based on their choices and roles at the time, and whether people should be judged according to their social roles and responsibilities or based on other evidence.

1. Should people be judged according to their social roles? Unit 1, Problem 7

2. For your figure, highlight… Social roles Responsibilities associated with each role

3. Medieval Duke: Do you go to war in Jerusalem?

4. Western Army Officer: Do you attack the natives?

5. Medieval Duke (1100): Social Roles Responsibilities Role

6. Should you go to war in Jerusalem? Yes No

7. Western Army Officer (1894): Social Roles Responsibilities Role

8. Should you attack the natives? Yes No

9. Let’s see what really happened

10. Highlight What your figure decided to do How society judged him at the time

11. Godfrey de Bouillon’s Choice

12. John M. Chivington’s Choice

13. How should we judge Godfrey? Is Godfrey a good person?

14. How should we judge John? Is John a good person?

15. Should people be judged according to their social roles? Solve the problem using evidence from class

16. Should people be judged according to their social roles?