This document discusses whether people should be judged according to their social roles and responsibilities. It presents scenarios about a Medieval Duke deciding whether to go to war in Jerusalem and a Western Army Officer in 1894 deciding whether to attack natives. It asks the reader to consider how Godfrey de Bouillon and John M. Chivington were judged based on their choices and roles at the time, and whether people should be judged according to their social roles and responsibilities or based on other evidence.