This document discusses a mock trial scenario about a woman named Julia who sued a coffee shop after spilling hot coffee on herself. The document outlines the evidence that would be presented in the trial, including that the coffee was served much hotter than the shop's rules allowed, putting customers at risk of burns. After reviewing all the evidence, the judge found the coffee shop partly liable but also found Julia partly negligent, reducing her claim by 25%. The document then prompts the reader to consider questions that would need to be asked in another mock trial about a character named Riel to determine their guilt or innocence.

1. Re-Trial

2. I am Riel’ly excited for the trial

3. Trials
● One important, fundamental concept is “Burden of
Proof”.
● The defendant is innocent until proven guilty.
● It is the job of the prosecution to prove to the jury the
defendant is guilty.

4. Scenario
Julia bought a cup of coffee. When she drank her first mouthful it spilt and
caused her damage. She thought she should be compensated.She wrote to the
owner who refused so she took advice from a lawyer.The lawyer said the
owner should pay her and took them to court claiming “damages”
(that is, compensation for the loss she said she had suffered).

5. What do we think?
Who is to blame?
What is our reaction?

6. Evidence
We are going to go through pieces of evidence together one at a time.
Stand on one side of the class for Guilty, the other for Not Guilty.
Move towards the other side as your opinion changes.
Lets see if this changes our opinion.

7. Evidence
Julia was an old lady of at least 70.

8. Evidence
She bought the coffee at a “drive-in” coffee shop.

9. Evidence
Julia was driving a 10 year old car when she pulled
in to buy the coffee.
She had a friend with her in the car.

10. Evidence
The coffee was served in a paper cup.
The cup had a lid on it with a drinking spout.

11. Evidence
The lid wasn’t secure when the carton was given
to Julia; she didn’t notice this.

12. Evidence
The carton was marked “Coffee – Hot”.
The drive-in had a notice saying “Please move on
from the drive- in kiosk as soon as you have paid”.
Jennifer actually tried to take a sip of coffee as
soon as she received the carton.
Her car was stationary at the time.

13. Evidence
The coffee was so hot that it burned Jennifer’s
tongue.
She jumped up in her seat and dropped the cup.
The lid came off and the spilt coffee burned her
arm.
She was taken to hospital for treatment.

14. Evidence
The coffee shop owners had set rules about the
temperature that coffee should be served at.
Their machines should have been set to heat the
water to well below scalding levels.
It was designed to be reasonable for most people
to drink straight away.

15. Evidence
Investigation showed that these machines had in
fact been set at a higher temperature.
The coffee shop staff used cheaper grade coffee
beans so that the coffee had to be made with
higher temperature water.
The higher temperature could be dangerous to
some people with more sensitive skin.

16. Well?
Do we have enough information now?
Is this Guilty, Not Guilty, or both?

17. Outcome
Case found coffee shop liable. However Julia was partly negligent. The judge
reduced the claim by 25%

18. What about Riel?
• What kind of questions do we need to ask in OUR trial to determine if Riel is
guilty?
• Come up with 3 questions that you would want to ask someone in the trial
and one of them can be for your own character…
• When you are done we will go downstairs to the learning commons. You
should be DONE your research and have notes, and either your mini-essay
or your character profile. Make sure you have sources for your information.
• When that is done check in with the prosecution and defence teams to make
sure you have the information you need to testify.