Tort (negligence) notes on negligence for tort law
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
11 likes•7,983 views
This document outlines key concepts in establishing negligence in a legal case, including: 1. The three elements that must be proven in a negligence claim according to Caparo: foreseeability, proximity, and that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose liability. 2. Determining the standard of care, including using the reasonable person test. 3. Proving breach of the standard of care, considering factors like knowledge of risk, magnitude of risk, and practicability of precautions. 4. Establishing causation between the breach and damages, addressing intervening causes and the remoteness of damages.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Negligence duty of care
The document discusses the duty of care in negligence cases. It explains that there are four key considerations for establishing a duty of care: (1) duty of care, (2) breach of duty of care, (3) causation, and (4) loss or injury. It then focuses on duty of care, outlining the traditional categories where a duty of care has been established (such as between doctors/patients). It also discusses novel cases and explains the three part test of foresight, proximity, and fairness used to determine if a duty of care exists. Specific cases are referenced to illustrate various principles around establishing duty of care.
Breach of duty
The document discusses the legal standard of care known as the "reasonable man" and factors that can affect what is considered reasonable in different situations. It analyzes several past negligence cases to illustrate how the standard of care is determined, including considering the characteristics of the defendant and claimant, the size of the risk, precautions taken, and benefits of taking a risk. Special care may be needed for professionals, people with disabilities or illnesses, emergencies, and greater known risks.
Torts causation of_facts
The document discusses causation in negligence cases under English law. It outlines two types of causation: (1) causation in fact, known as the "but for" test, which examines whether the plaintiff's loss would have occurred but for the defendant's negligence; and (2) causation in law (remoteness of damages), which examines whether the damages are too remote to hold the defendant liable. It provides examples of how courts have applied the "but for" test and exceptions where it does not apply, such as when the defendant's actions materially increase the risk of injury or there are multiple possible causes of damage.
LAW OF TORT - caselist
This document summarizes key tort law cases related to psychiatric injury claims. It establishes that:
1. The law initially looked more favorably on physical injury claims than psychiatric claims, but McLoughlin allowed claims in some cases where the plaintiff was not directly involved.
2. Alcock distinguished between primary and secondary victims, with primary victims facing less strict conditions to claim. This definition was refined in White to require being in a "zone of foreseeable danger."
3. Secondary victims face stricter conditions around proximity of relationship, time and space, and experiencing the event directly rather than indirectly.
4. The definition of primary victims may not be entirely settled, as shown in W v Es
Torts _present_laws_on_ner
This document summarizes the present law on nervous shock in three elements that a plaintiff must prove:
1) That the plaintiff is suffering from a positive psychiatric illness rather than mere grief, and the thin skull rule applies so preexisting conditions don't prevent recovery.
2) That the plaintiff's psychiatric illness was reasonably foreseeable and the proximity factors are satisfied, initially only for close family but now extended to other close relationships. Bystanders in a catastrophic event may also recover.
3) That the plaintiff's psychiatric illness was caused by the defendant's breach of duty, and proximity in time and space to the accident is required, such as witnessing the immediate aftermath or rescue efforts, but not learning of it
Torts contributARY negligence
P can be found contributorily negligent if their actions were reasonably foreseeable to cause harm and they failed to act as a reasonable person. The elements of contributory negligence are foreseeability of harm and causation between the plaintiff's actions and their damages. Some examples of contributory negligence include riding in an unsafe position on construction equipment, failing to follow safety instructions, not wearing a required helmet, boarding a moving bus, or getting into a car with a drunk driver. Minors may also be contributorily negligent depending on their age and maturity. When determining damages, the court will apportion liability based on the relative fault of the plaintiff and defendants.
Law - Chapter 5 cases
The document summarizes several landmark cases that helped establish the legal concept of duty of care in tort law:
1) Winterbottom v Wright established that a contract alone does not create a duty of care to third parties not in privity of contract.
2) Donoghue v Stevenson established that manufacturers owe a duty of care to consumers to take reasonable care to avoid injury from their products.
3) Grant v Australian Knitting Mills extended this duty to manufacturers of clothing that caused injury to the plaintiff when worn.
Negligence
The document discusses the tort of negligence. It defines negligence as a failure to take reasonable care that results in harm to another person. When bringing a negligence claim, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed them a duty of care, that the duty was breached, and that the breach caused harm. Several cases are examined that deal with establishing duty of care and foreseeability of harm in negligence cases.
Recommended
Negligence duty of care
The document discusses the duty of care in negligence cases. It explains that there are four key considerations for establishing a duty of care: (1) duty of care, (2) breach of duty of care, (3) causation, and (4) loss or injury. It then focuses on duty of care, outlining the traditional categories where a duty of care has been established (such as between doctors/patients). It also discusses novel cases and explains the three part test of foresight, proximity, and fairness used to determine if a duty of care exists. Specific cases are referenced to illustrate various principles around establishing duty of care.
Breach of duty
The document discusses the legal standard of care known as the "reasonable man" and factors that can affect what is considered reasonable in different situations. It analyzes several past negligence cases to illustrate how the standard of care is determined, including considering the characteristics of the defendant and claimant, the size of the risk, precautions taken, and benefits of taking a risk. Special care may be needed for professionals, people with disabilities or illnesses, emergencies, and greater known risks.
Torts causation of_facts
The document discusses causation in negligence cases under English law. It outlines two types of causation: (1) causation in fact, known as the "but for" test, which examines whether the plaintiff's loss would have occurred but for the defendant's negligence; and (2) causation in law (remoteness of damages), which examines whether the damages are too remote to hold the defendant liable. It provides examples of how courts have applied the "but for" test and exceptions where it does not apply, such as when the defendant's actions materially increase the risk of injury or there are multiple possible causes of damage.
LAW OF TORT - caselist
This document summarizes key tort law cases related to psychiatric injury claims. It establishes that:
1. The law initially looked more favorably on physical injury claims than psychiatric claims, but McLoughlin allowed claims in some cases where the plaintiff was not directly involved.
2. Alcock distinguished between primary and secondary victims, with primary victims facing less strict conditions to claim. This definition was refined in White to require being in a "zone of foreseeable danger."
3. Secondary victims face stricter conditions around proximity of relationship, time and space, and experiencing the event directly rather than indirectly.
4. The definition of primary victims may not be entirely settled, as shown in W v Es
Torts _present_laws_on_ner
This document summarizes the present law on nervous shock in three elements that a plaintiff must prove:
1) That the plaintiff is suffering from a positive psychiatric illness rather than mere grief, and the thin skull rule applies so preexisting conditions don't prevent recovery.
2) That the plaintiff's psychiatric illness was reasonably foreseeable and the proximity factors are satisfied, initially only for close family but now extended to other close relationships. Bystanders in a catastrophic event may also recover.
3) That the plaintiff's psychiatric illness was caused by the defendant's breach of duty, and proximity in time and space to the accident is required, such as witnessing the immediate aftermath or rescue efforts, but not learning of it
Torts contributARY negligence
P can be found contributorily negligent if their actions were reasonably foreseeable to cause harm and they failed to act as a reasonable person. The elements of contributory negligence are foreseeability of harm and causation between the plaintiff's actions and their damages. Some examples of contributory negligence include riding in an unsafe position on construction equipment, failing to follow safety instructions, not wearing a required helmet, boarding a moving bus, or getting into a car with a drunk driver. Minors may also be contributorily negligent depending on their age and maturity. When determining damages, the court will apportion liability based on the relative fault of the plaintiff and defendants.
Law - Chapter 5 cases
The document summarizes several landmark cases that helped establish the legal concept of duty of care in tort law:
1) Winterbottom v Wright established that a contract alone does not create a duty of care to third parties not in privity of contract.
2) Donoghue v Stevenson established that manufacturers owe a duty of care to consumers to take reasonable care to avoid injury from their products.
3) Grant v Australian Knitting Mills extended this duty to manufacturers of clothing that caused injury to the plaintiff when worn.
Negligence
The document discusses the tort of negligence. It defines negligence as a failure to take reasonable care that results in harm to another person. When bringing a negligence claim, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed them a duty of care, that the duty was breached, and that the breach caused harm. Several cases are examined that deal with establishing duty of care and foreseeability of harm in negligence cases.
Negligence duty of care cases
This document discusses several negligence duty of care cases in tort law:
1) Donoghue v Stevenson established that manufacturers have a duty of care to consumers for defects that could cause injury.
2) Smoldon v Whitworth found that a rugby referee owes a duty of care to players to reasonably enforce safety rules and prevent unnecessary risks of injury.
3) Dominion Natural Gas v Collins held that those who install dangerous machines have a duty to take reasonable precautions to prevent injuries, even if they do not own or control the property.
Torts cases and_material
This document summarizes 40 cases related to the legal maxim "volenti non fit injuria" (consent prevents legal injury). Some of the key points covered include:
- The defendant must prove the plaintiff freely and voluntarily consented with full knowledge of the risks involved. Implied or broad consent may be sufficient in some circumstances like medical emergencies.
- Rescue cases established that injury to rescuers was a foreseeable result of the original negligence or wrongdoing.
- The defense of volenti does not apply if the consent was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.
- Public policy considerations can prevent certain duties of care from being imposed, such as between barristers during court proceedings.
General Defences in Tort Law
Detailed Presentation on General Defences under Law of Torts
Made By:
Edited By: Ayush Patria, Sangam University, Bhilwara
Follow us on Instagram: @law_laboratory
Website: www.lawlaboratory.in
Damage
Causation in fact is the starting point for determining liability in negligence claims. There must be a causal link between the defendant's actions and the claimant's loss. Causation in fact is evaluated using the "but for" test - but for the defendant's actions, would the loss have occurred? If the loss would have occurred regardless, then factual causation is not established. However, in cases of exposure to toxic substances like asbestos where determining the specific cause is difficult, courts have modified the causation standard so that liability can be apportioned among all possible tortfeasors. An intervening act can break the chain of causation if it was not reasonably foreseeable, such as an unexpected act of vandal
Torts causation in_law
The document discusses the legal principles of foreseeability and novus actus interveniens in tort law. It provides examples of cases where:
1) The defendant was found liable because the type of damage was reasonably foreseeable, even if the extent was not (e.g. Wagon Mound I).
2) Intervening acts by the plaintiff or third parties may absolve the defendant of liability, unless their acts were foreseeable consequences of the defendant's negligence (e.g. McKew v Holland).
3) Natural or non-negligent intervening events will break the chain of causation and liability (e.g. Carslogie Steamship).
Justification In Tort
The document discusses several justifications or exceptions for tort liability, including:
1. Volenti non fit injuria (consent), where harm is not legally actionable if consented to. Consent can be express or implied.
2. Act of God/vis major, which excuses liability for harm caused by natural events beyond human control, like storms or floods.
3. Rescue cases, where the defense of consent does not apply to rescuers facing risk to save others from imminent danger caused by the defendant's negligence.
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
This document discusses several court cases related to public policy and psychiatric injury from tort cases. It establishes that courts now have the power to consider public policy implications when imposing liability. One case did not impose liability on police who failed to act on a warning about a teacher who later killed a student, though this was later challenged. The standard for primary victims claiming psychiatric injuries was that injuries must be reasonably foreseeable, and secondary victims must meet four criteria including witnessing the incident and having a close relationship to the primary victim.
torts Flowchart
The document summarizes the key elements of the tort of negligence in English law. It is divided into three sections: [1] duty of care, [2] breach of duty, and [3] damage caused by the breach. For each section, it outlines the legal tests and principles used to determine if there is negligence. It provides numerous examples of English court cases that have helped develop the legal standards for establishing negligence. The summary concisely covers the essential information about this topic.
Tort Law: Causation
This document discusses several legal cases related to causation in tort law. It covers topics such as: factual causation tests like the "but for" test; multiple causes of harm where a defendant's actions contributed materially to the damage; intervening acts that may break the chain of causation; the thin skull rule where defendants must take victims as they find them; and the test that the harm suffered must be reasonably foreseeable to be recoverable.
Remoteness of damage
- Causation in law requires that damage be both factually caused by the defendant's actions, as well as not being too remote or unforeseeable.
- The case of Wagon Mound established that defendants are only liable for foreseeable consequences of their actions. While the oil spill was foreseeably damaging, the subsequent fire was too remote.
- Remoteness looks at whether the type of damage, not just its form, was reasonably foreseeable. Cases like Bradford v Robinson and Hughes v Lord Advocate found liability even for unusual forms of foreseeable injury types.
Torts _nuisance_ii
(1) Private nuisance claims can be brought by owners, occupiers, or tenants of land affected by the nuisance. Guests and lodgers cannot sue. Anyone can sue for public nuisance if they suffered special damage.
(2) The creator or occupier of premises where a nuisance originates can be sued. An occupier is liable if the nuisance existed when they acquired the property and they knew or should have known about it. Occupiers are also liable for nuisances caused by people lawfully on the premises or for failing to address nuisances caused by trespassers or acts of God once aware. Landlords can be liable in some circumstances.
(3) Coming to a nuisance,
Torts _nuisance_i
(1) Private nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of their property. It requires an interference or recurrent state of affairs.
(2) Types of private nuisance include obstruction of rights of way, interference with drainage systems causing flooding, indiscriminate excavation causing subsidence, vibration damage to neighboring buildings, radiation affecting health, and fallen trees endangering highways.
(3) Whether an activity constitutes a nuisance depends on factors like the character of the defendant's conduct, balancing interests, the extent of harm, nature of the locality, utility of the conduct, abnormal sensitivity, intention to cause injury, and temporary vs ongoing interference. Reasonableness, locality, and the sensitivity of the
Torts defence_strict_liability
1) Defendants can escape liability for the escape of things they accumulate on their land under certain defences, including consent of the plaintiff, common benefit, act of a third party, act of God, statutory authority, and default of the plaintiff.
2) The modern position of the Rylands v Fletcher rule is that it has developed in scope to more closely resemble a negligence claim, requiring reasonable foreseeability of the escape. Claims under the rule now seldom succeed on their own in court. Nuisance claims do not require accumulation and escape or non-natural use of the land.
3) Defences that can allow defendants to escape liability include when the plaintiff consented to the accumulation, where the source of danger was for
TORT II [remedy notes]
This document discusses various types of remedies available in tort law, including self-help remedies, injunctions, and damages. It provides examples of cases to illustrate different points. Specifically, it discusses:
1) Self-help remedies that allow plaintiffs to eliminate annoyances without court intervention, as seen in Collins v Renison (1754).
2) Injunctions, including prohibitory injunctions that stop ongoing faults, and mandatory injunctions that order defendants to take action, as in Morris v Redland Bricks Ltd (1970).
3) Damages aim to restore plaintiffs to their pre-tort positions, as explained in Lim Poh Choo v Camden and Islington Area Health Authority (
Law - Chapter 6 cases
The document summarizes several cases related to restrictive covenants and restraint of trade:
- Nordenfelt v Nordenfelt Machine Gun: The court enforced a covenant prohibiting Nordenfelt from manufacturing guns or ammunition worldwide for 25 years.
- Vancouver Malt v Breweries: A covenant prohibiting the sale of a business from brewing any beer was too broad, as the goodwill was only related to sake.
- Goldsoll v Goldman: A covenant restricting jewellery business competition across Europe and the US for 2 years was too broad.
"Como manejar el contenido de una crisis " Joan Gladstone
This document provides guidance on managing content during a crisis. It discusses the importance of acting quickly to become an authoritative information source. When preparing content, organizations should focus on facts of the situation, actions they are taking to address it, and expressing empathy for those impacted. Specific examples are provided for crafting statements that convey these elements in a way that influences perception and maintains trust. The document advises tailoring messages for different audiences and using multiple channels of communication to disseminate information.
Risk Shifting in Construction Losses
This document discusses construction risk management strategies related to indemnification agreements and additional insured requirements. It provides an overview of how indemnification clauses in construction contracts can be used to shift risk between owners, general contractors, and subcontractors. The document also examines issues around procuring adequate insurance and ensuring parties are properly named as additional insureds. Key topics covered include direct versus vicarious liability, anti-indemnity statutes, insured contracts, and how policy language determines the scope of additional insured coverage.
Strict liability
The document discusses the rule of strict liability established by Rylands v Fletcher and its exceptions. The Rylands v Fletcher case established that a person is strictly liable for damages caused by anything dangerous they bring onto their land that escapes and causes harm, even if they were not negligent. The key exceptions to this rule of strict liability are acts of God, acts of third parties, the plaintiff's own fault, when the act is authorized by statute, and when the plaintiff has consented to the presence of the dangerous thing.
Fordham law school:
This course agenda provides an overview of how to address traffic and parking violations in New York City. It begins with statistics on NYC parking tickets and the process for receiving a ticket. It then outlines how to fight a NYC parking ticket, including relevant laws, time limitations, hearing processes, required proof, possible defenses, and parking sign requirements. Examples of past cases are also briefly mentioned. The overall goal is to help clients understand and navigate disputes related to NYC traffic and parking violations.
Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning
Students can expect to do a lot of reading on their own for distance learning courses. While textbooks may still be required, teachers will provide study guides, reading material, and perhaps a reading list. Distance learning provides opportunities for those who missed out on conventional learning and allows students to choose from a wide variety of schools.
Open Education Bridging the Gap Inequality of Higher Education (Opportunity C...
Open Education Bridging the Gap Inequality of Higher Education (Opportunity C...Open Education Global (OEGlobal)
OPEN EDUCATION BRIDGING THE GAP INEQUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY
(Case: E-Learning Strategy Indonesian Open Distance Education)
Devi Ayuni
Andy Mulyana
Ginta Ginting
UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA, INDONESIATeaching and learning at a distance
This document provides an overview of the 4th edition of the textbook "Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education". It discusses how the textbook covers theory, skills, and management issues related to distance education. It highlights new features in this edition like increased coverage of course management systems and online instruction. The document also includes an excerpt from Chapter 1 about a true story of four chemistry teachers who collaborated to team-teach a chemistry course across four schools connected by a fiber optic network.
More Related Content
What's hot
Negligence duty of care cases
This document discusses several negligence duty of care cases in tort law:
1) Donoghue v Stevenson established that manufacturers have a duty of care to consumers for defects that could cause injury.
2) Smoldon v Whitworth found that a rugby referee owes a duty of care to players to reasonably enforce safety rules and prevent unnecessary risks of injury.
3) Dominion Natural Gas v Collins held that those who install dangerous machines have a duty to take reasonable precautions to prevent injuries, even if they do not own or control the property.
Torts cases and_material
This document summarizes 40 cases related to the legal maxim "volenti non fit injuria" (consent prevents legal injury). Some of the key points covered include:
- The defendant must prove the plaintiff freely and voluntarily consented with full knowledge of the risks involved. Implied or broad consent may be sufficient in some circumstances like medical emergencies.
- Rescue cases established that injury to rescuers was a foreseeable result of the original negligence or wrongdoing.
- The defense of volenti does not apply if the consent was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.
- Public policy considerations can prevent certain duties of care from being imposed, such as between barristers during court proceedings.
General Defences in Tort Law
Detailed Presentation on General Defences under Law of Torts
Made By:
Edited By: Ayush Patria, Sangam University, Bhilwara
Follow us on Instagram: @law_laboratory
Website: www.lawlaboratory.in
Damage
Causation in fact is the starting point for determining liability in negligence claims. There must be a causal link between the defendant's actions and the claimant's loss. Causation in fact is evaluated using the "but for" test - but for the defendant's actions, would the loss have occurred? If the loss would have occurred regardless, then factual causation is not established. However, in cases of exposure to toxic substances like asbestos where determining the specific cause is difficult, courts have modified the causation standard so that liability can be apportioned among all possible tortfeasors. An intervening act can break the chain of causation if it was not reasonably foreseeable, such as an unexpected act of vandal
Torts causation in_law
The document discusses the legal principles of foreseeability and novus actus interveniens in tort law. It provides examples of cases where:
1) The defendant was found liable because the type of damage was reasonably foreseeable, even if the extent was not (e.g. Wagon Mound I).
2) Intervening acts by the plaintiff or third parties may absolve the defendant of liability, unless their acts were foreseeable consequences of the defendant's negligence (e.g. McKew v Holland).
3) Natural or non-negligent intervening events will break the chain of causation and liability (e.g. Carslogie Steamship).
Justification In Tort
The document discusses several justifications or exceptions for tort liability, including:
1. Volenti non fit injuria (consent), where harm is not legally actionable if consented to. Consent can be express or implied.
2. Act of God/vis major, which excuses liability for harm caused by natural events beyond human control, like storms or floods.
3. Rescue cases, where the defense of consent does not apply to rescuers facing risk to save others from imminent danger caused by the defendant's negligence.
Tort Law: Public Policy And Psychiatric Injury
This document discusses several court cases related to public policy and psychiatric injury from tort cases. It establishes that courts now have the power to consider public policy implications when imposing liability. One case did not impose liability on police who failed to act on a warning about a teacher who later killed a student, though this was later challenged. The standard for primary victims claiming psychiatric injuries was that injuries must be reasonably foreseeable, and secondary victims must meet four criteria including witnessing the incident and having a close relationship to the primary victim.
torts Flowchart
The document summarizes the key elements of the tort of negligence in English law. It is divided into three sections: [1] duty of care, [2] breach of duty, and [3] damage caused by the breach. For each section, it outlines the legal tests and principles used to determine if there is negligence. It provides numerous examples of English court cases that have helped develop the legal standards for establishing negligence. The summary concisely covers the essential information about this topic.
Tort Law: Causation
This document discusses several legal cases related to causation in tort law. It covers topics such as: factual causation tests like the "but for" test; multiple causes of harm where a defendant's actions contributed materially to the damage; intervening acts that may break the chain of causation; the thin skull rule where defendants must take victims as they find them; and the test that the harm suffered must be reasonably foreseeable to be recoverable.
Remoteness of damage
- Causation in law requires that damage be both factually caused by the defendant's actions, as well as not being too remote or unforeseeable.
- The case of Wagon Mound established that defendants are only liable for foreseeable consequences of their actions. While the oil spill was foreseeably damaging, the subsequent fire was too remote.
- Remoteness looks at whether the type of damage, not just its form, was reasonably foreseeable. Cases like Bradford v Robinson and Hughes v Lord Advocate found liability even for unusual forms of foreseeable injury types.
Torts _nuisance_ii
(1) Private nuisance claims can be brought by owners, occupiers, or tenants of land affected by the nuisance. Guests and lodgers cannot sue. Anyone can sue for public nuisance if they suffered special damage.
(2) The creator or occupier of premises where a nuisance originates can be sued. An occupier is liable if the nuisance existed when they acquired the property and they knew or should have known about it. Occupiers are also liable for nuisances caused by people lawfully on the premises or for failing to address nuisances caused by trespassers or acts of God once aware. Landlords can be liable in some circumstances.
(3) Coming to a nuisance,
Torts _nuisance_i
(1) Private nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of their property. It requires an interference or recurrent state of affairs.
(2) Types of private nuisance include obstruction of rights of way, interference with drainage systems causing flooding, indiscriminate excavation causing subsidence, vibration damage to neighboring buildings, radiation affecting health, and fallen trees endangering highways.
(3) Whether an activity constitutes a nuisance depends on factors like the character of the defendant's conduct, balancing interests, the extent of harm, nature of the locality, utility of the conduct, abnormal sensitivity, intention to cause injury, and temporary vs ongoing interference. Reasonableness, locality, and the sensitivity of the
Torts defence_strict_liability
1) Defendants can escape liability for the escape of things they accumulate on their land under certain defences, including consent of the plaintiff, common benefit, act of a third party, act of God, statutory authority, and default of the plaintiff.
2) The modern position of the Rylands v Fletcher rule is that it has developed in scope to more closely resemble a negligence claim, requiring reasonable foreseeability of the escape. Claims under the rule now seldom succeed on their own in court. Nuisance claims do not require accumulation and escape or non-natural use of the land.
3) Defences that can allow defendants to escape liability include when the plaintiff consented to the accumulation, where the source of danger was for
TORT II [remedy notes]
This document discusses various types of remedies available in tort law, including self-help remedies, injunctions, and damages. It provides examples of cases to illustrate different points. Specifically, it discusses:
1) Self-help remedies that allow plaintiffs to eliminate annoyances without court intervention, as seen in Collins v Renison (1754).
2) Injunctions, including prohibitory injunctions that stop ongoing faults, and mandatory injunctions that order defendants to take action, as in Morris v Redland Bricks Ltd (1970).
3) Damages aim to restore plaintiffs to their pre-tort positions, as explained in Lim Poh Choo v Camden and Islington Area Health Authority (
Law - Chapter 6 cases
The document summarizes several cases related to restrictive covenants and restraint of trade:
- Nordenfelt v Nordenfelt Machine Gun: The court enforced a covenant prohibiting Nordenfelt from manufacturing guns or ammunition worldwide for 25 years.
- Vancouver Malt v Breweries: A covenant prohibiting the sale of a business from brewing any beer was too broad, as the goodwill was only related to sake.
- Goldsoll v Goldman: A covenant restricting jewellery business competition across Europe and the US for 2 years was too broad.
"Como manejar el contenido de una crisis " Joan Gladstone
This document provides guidance on managing content during a crisis. It discusses the importance of acting quickly to become an authoritative information source. When preparing content, organizations should focus on facts of the situation, actions they are taking to address it, and expressing empathy for those impacted. Specific examples are provided for crafting statements that convey these elements in a way that influences perception and maintains trust. The document advises tailoring messages for different audiences and using multiple channels of communication to disseminate information.
Risk Shifting in Construction Losses
This document discusses construction risk management strategies related to indemnification agreements and additional insured requirements. It provides an overview of how indemnification clauses in construction contracts can be used to shift risk between owners, general contractors, and subcontractors. The document also examines issues around procuring adequate insurance and ensuring parties are properly named as additional insureds. Key topics covered include direct versus vicarious liability, anti-indemnity statutes, insured contracts, and how policy language determines the scope of additional insured coverage.
Strict liability
The document discusses the rule of strict liability established by Rylands v Fletcher and its exceptions. The Rylands v Fletcher case established that a person is strictly liable for damages caused by anything dangerous they bring onto their land that escapes and causes harm, even if they were not negligent. The key exceptions to this rule of strict liability are acts of God, acts of third parties, the plaintiff's own fault, when the act is authorized by statute, and when the plaintiff has consented to the presence of the dangerous thing.
Fordham law school:
This course agenda provides an overview of how to address traffic and parking violations in New York City. It begins with statistics on NYC parking tickets and the process for receiving a ticket. It then outlines how to fight a NYC parking ticket, including relevant laws, time limitations, hearing processes, required proof, possible defenses, and parking sign requirements. Examples of past cases are also briefly mentioned. The overall goal is to help clients understand and navigate disputes related to NYC traffic and parking violations.
What's hot (19)
"Como manejar el contenido de una crisis " Joan Gladstone
"Como manejar el contenido de una crisis " Joan Gladstone
Viewers also liked
Advantages and disadvantages of distance learning
Students can expect to do a lot of reading on their own for distance learning courses. While textbooks may still be required, teachers will provide study guides, reading material, and perhaps a reading list. Distance learning provides opportunities for those who missed out on conventional learning and allows students to choose from a wide variety of schools.
Open Education Bridging the Gap Inequality of Higher Education (Opportunity C...
Open Education Bridging the Gap Inequality of Higher Education (Opportunity C...Open Education Global (OEGlobal)
OPEN EDUCATION BRIDGING THE GAP INEQUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY
(Case: E-Learning Strategy Indonesian Open Distance Education)
Devi Ayuni
Andy Mulyana
Ginta Ginting
UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA, INDONESIATeaching and learning at a distance
This document provides an overview of the 4th edition of the textbook "Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education". It discusses how the textbook covers theory, skills, and management issues related to distance education. It highlights new features in this edition like increased coverage of course management systems and online instruction. The document also includes an excerpt from Chapter 1 about a true story of four chemistry teachers who collaborated to team-teach a chemistry course across four schools connected by a fiber optic network.
Distance Learning
This document discusses distance learning and learning management systems. It defines distance learning as education where teachers and students are separated in place and time, with technology used to bridge the gap. Key advantages of distance learning include flexibility, accessibility, and convenience. The document then discusses learning management systems, defining them as web-based applications for e-learning programs. It provides screenshots of example LMS interfaces, showing features like courses, lessons, exams, assignments, news/updates, and messaging. The conclusion reiterates that distance learning provides a convenient option for many students.
E-Learning and Distance Education in Higher Education: Organizational Implica...
This document discusses the organizational implications of e-learning and distance education in higher education. It notes there is a clash between the traditional collegial culture of universities and the more managerial approach required for e-learning. This clash can create organizational conflict as academics adhere to collegial norms while e-learning demands management. The quality and sustainability of e-learning programs may be at risk if this conflict is not resolved.
Barriers To E-Learning In Job Training--Government Employee Experiences In An...
Learning at work as an employee is inherently different from being a student in an academic setting and, as such, is beset with different challenges. As trends in the adoption of e-learning for the delivery of job training increase, new challenges related to distance learning with technology have also emerged. Recognition that continued learning in the workplace, now via technological methods, is required for maintaining proficiency and achieving career goals means that understanding the challenges unique to learning at work is paramount.
This qualitative study explored barriers to successful online job learning. Interviews with thirty federal government employees from the Forest Service and National Park Service enrolled in an online wilderness planning course revealed that attrition frameworks typically used to describe barriers to persistence in academia and distance education only partially describe hindering factors relevant to workplace learning. Although these hindering factors can generally be categorized as workplace; personality trait, and preference; course design/structure; or technology barriers, such categorization oversimplifies the true nature of employees’ struggles to learn on the job.
This study's findings reveal three overarching systemic problems: 1) illusion of convenience, 2) absence of deeper learning, and 3) lack of an organizational culture of learning. These systemic problems demonstrate that complex interactions between various barriers create a cyclic system often preventing attainment of student-controlled, student-centered learning, two benefits of self-paced study. Other barrier interactions can foster employment of superficial, rather than deep, learning strategies possibly leaving employees ill-prepared to negotiate the situations for which they are supposedly being trained. Cultural elements of the structure and organization of work suggest that workplace learning is devalued, under-recognized and often unsupported, making the challenges to adaptation in an increasingly technological era even more significant.
Distance education and e learning
Distance education and e-learning involve students learning remotely using electronic communication rather than being physically present. Distance learning can be delivered synchronously in real-time or asynchronously allowing students to learn at their own pace. Popular technologies used include voice recordings, videos, interactive videoconferencing, and computer-based learning delivered over the internet. E-learning provides flexible scheduling, eliminates geographic barriers, and accommodates different learning styles.
E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education
A presentation to the UNED International Conference on Distance Education, San José, Costa Rica, November 5, 2004
Hrdkorea E Learning System
The document introduces HRD Korea's e-learning system, which includes distance vocational training, tele-vocational training using video conferencing, cyber-training online courses, and vocational broadcasting on television and the internet. The system aims to provide high-quality and accessible vocational training across Korea using various media and overcome limitations of time and location.
EV682 Developing an Inclusive Learning Environment
The document discusses models of disability and inclusion in education. The medical model views impairment as the problem, while the social model sees societal barriers as the problem. The document advocates celebrating diversity and ensuring equalities to support students' self-esteem and address underachievement through social inclusion and access. It outlines legislation promoting inclusion and notes the importance of high expectations, responding to student needs, and overcoming potential barriers to learning.
Legal Implications In Nursing Practice
The document discusses several key legal implications in nursing practice, including sources of law, licensure, risk management, and the use of restraints. It notes that law establishes the framework for legal nursing actions and differentiates nurse responsibilities. Licensure is required and can be revoked for incompetence, misconduct or crimes. Risk management focuses on preventing injuries to patients and staff and reducing liability. Restraint use must be ordered, implemented safely and for the least time possible.
Distance Education and E- Learning (MOOCS)
This document provides an overview of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and the Coursera platform. It discusses that Coursera was founded in 2012 by computer science professors from Stanford University to offer online courses from top institutions for free worldwide. It provides details on Coursera's mission to provide universal access to education, philosophy of online learning, the hundreds of courses offered across many fields, learner supports, use of technologies like Scala programming, quality assurance protocols, and management systems to develop and deliver online courses at scale.
Distance Education Definition
Distance education is defined as education that takes place when the instructor and student are separated by space and/or time, with the gap bridged through technology. It is a field that focuses on pedagogy, instructional design, and technology to deliver education to students who are not physically on-site. Distance education has evolved over time, starting with correspondence education using printed materials via mail, then adding visual instruction and television, and now utilizing various multimedia technologies like audio/video conferencing.
Legal issues in Community health nursing
This document discusses legal issues in community health nursing. It defines key terms like legislation, regulations, and judicial law. It explains the sources of law including statutory law, administrative law, and common law. The functions of legal law in nursing are to provide a framework for nursing actions, differentiate nursing responsibilities, establish boundaries, and maintain standards. Legal issues that can arise include negligence, malpractice, assault, battery, invasion of privacy, and defamation of character. Laws impact nursing practices through professional negligence and scope of practice. The document also summarizes legal safeguards in nursing like credentialing, good Samaritan laws, standards of care, and informed consent.
Barriers To E-Learning Job Training Presentation (no sound)
Learning at work as an employee is inherently different from being a student in an academic setting and, as such, is beset with different challenges. As trends in the adoption of e-learning for the delivery of job training increase, new challenges related to distance learning with technology have also emerged. Recognition that continued learning in the workplace, now via technological methods, is required for maintaining proficiency and achieving career goals means that understanding the challenges unique to learning at work is paramount.
This qualitative study explored barriers to successful online job learning. Interviews with thirty federal government employees from the Forest Service and National Park Service enrolled in an online wilderness planning course revealed that attrition frameworks typically used to describe barriers to persistence in academia and distance education only partially describe hindering factors relevant to workplace learning. Although these hindering factors can generally be categorized as workplace; personality trait, and preference; course design/structure; or technology barriers, such categorization oversimplifies the true nature of employees’ struggles to learn on the job.
This study's findings reveal three overarching systemic problems: 1) illusion of convenience, 2) absence of deeper learning, and 3) lack of an organizational culture of learning. These systemic problems demonstrate that complex interactions between various barriers create a cyclic system often preventing attainment of student-controlled, student-centered learning, two benefits of self-paced study. Other barrier interactions can foster employment of superficial, rather than deep, learning strategies possibly leaving employees ill-prepared to negotiate the situations for which they are supposedly being trained. Cultural elements of the structure and organization of work suggest that workplace learning is devalued, under-recognized and often unsupported, making the challenges to adaptation in an increasingly technological era even more significant.
Distance education
This document discusses nursing distance education. It begins by asking if distance learning can effectively teach nursing students the clinical and social skills needed for the profession. It then defines distance education as imparting instruction to students who are not physically present. The document notes that distance education increases access to nursing programs for students who cannot attend traditional courses due to geographic, family or work constraints. It also discusses standards and best practices for ensuring quality in distance nursing programs. In conclusion, it recognizes both advantages such as flexible scheduling and disadvantages such as potential difficulties gaining clinical skills through distance learning alone.
Distance Learning
Dr. Aries Cobb is an expert in the field of Distance Education, Distance Learning, Instructional Technology, Technology-Supported Cooperative Learning, e-Portfolio, e-Learning and Educational Technology. Dr. Aries Cobb, Faculty , Lecturer, & Researcher, is known for website design and e-Learning course development. Dr. Aries Cobb has published book chapters, a book and high-quality refereed & national journal article publications on the subject matter of e-Learning and Distance Education. Dr. Cobb is a faculty member, Lecturer and Instructor of Instructional Technology Distance Education (ITDE) in the Department of Curriculum and Foundations and Multicultural Engagement at Cleveland Sate University (CSU) and Notre Dame College of Ohio. Dr. Aries Cobb is a skilled Distance Education course development expert. Dr. Aries Cobb created the Slide Share "How Does Distance Learning Connect You To Different Cultures?"Dr. Aries Cobb, course designer and a researcher of Instructional Technology Distance Education (ITDE) and e-Learning for Educators and children. Dr. Aries Cobb, researcher, expert & scholar, is known for e-Learning, instructional technology & assistive technology, distance education course design.
ariescobb.com
E learning presentation (update 2012)
e-learning evolves very fast. Technologies are more and more open, and allow educators to create more and more powerful training.
Distance Education
This presentation introduce you to the concept of Distance Education.It includes the definition of distance education term ,a clarification of the difference between the two terms Distance Education and Distance Learning and finally it qives a quick overview of the history of Distance Education.
What is distance education?
Distance education aims to provide university education to students who cannot attend campus physically. It allows flexible study from anywhere in the world at any time. The benefits of distance education include fitting study around other commitments, varying study load, and interacting with other students and instructors online. However, it also has disadvantages like lack of social interaction, not being suitable for all learners, and requiring comfort with new technologies. Evaluating distance students involves tests, quizzes, projects, essays, and games to assess comprehension of topics from different perspectives. Key aspects to evaluate distance education programs are content, structure, communication, student assessment, flexibility, support, staff qualifications, leadership, resources, and holistic processes.
Viewers also liked (20)
Open Education Bridging the Gap Inequality of Higher Education (Opportunity C...
Open Education Bridging the Gap Inequality of Higher Education (Opportunity C...
E-Learning and Distance Education in Higher Education: Organizational Implica...
E-Learning and Distance Education in Higher Education: Organizational Implica...
Barriers To E-Learning In Job Training--Government Employee Experiences In An...
Barriers To E-Learning In Job Training--Government Employee Experiences In An...
EV682 Developing an Inclusive Learning Environment
EV682 Developing an Inclusive Learning Environment
Barriers To E-Learning Job Training Presentation (no sound)
Barriers To E-Learning Job Training Presentation (no sound)
Recently uploaded
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
असंगत न्यायालयी फैसलों के कारण भारत में महिलाओं को सुरक्षित गर्भपात के लिए एक भ्रामक और अनुचित कानूनी लड़ाई का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Rokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal Opinion
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita is weighing in on the proposed MLS soccer stadium project.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
USDA grants bolster rural communities, driving growth, sustainability, and prosperity through strategic development initiatives and financial support.
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Recently uploaded (20)
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Tort (negligence) notes on negligence for tort law
- 2. Three things to be proven Foreseeability Proximity Fair, just and reasonable Other situation where u no need use caparo, straight to the point Driver-nettleship v weston(new driver) Duty of care (caparo singular composite test)
- 3. What is the standard of care required Has defendant fallen below standard Establishing standard 1.Reasonable man standard-blyth v birmingham waterworks ( 2.Reasonable man- hall v brookland( man on clapham omnibus) Breach of duty
- 4. State of knowledge- roe v minister of health Magnitude of risk- greater risk of harm- bolton v stone(baseball) Risk of greater harm- paris v stepney(one eyed man) Practicability of precaution- latimer v AEC (sprinkle sawdust) Utility of conduct (watt v hertforshire) 2. Whether defendant come up to standard?
- 5. Bolam & Friern hospital Management- the test is the standard of ordinary skilled men exercising and professing to have the skill Bolitho v city and hackney HA- prove that professional opinion was not capable of withstanding logical analysis so doc will be liable Professional man standard
- 6. Res ipsa loquitor- fact speaks for itself Only can be used when 1. cause must be unknown 2. incident would not have happen had it not been for proper lack of care 3. defendant in control of situation Used to help claimant in difficult situation to establish breach and duty Proof of breach
- 7. But for cause- defendants carelessness must have caused damage or breach NAI – intervening act Through criminal conduct-smith v littlewoods Through careless conduct- knightly v johns Intervening natural events- carslogie steamship v royal norwegian government Causation
- 8. Wagonmound – damage must not be too remote and must be foreseable Remoteness of damage
- 9. Defendant must take the claimant in the situation he is, even though owing to body sensitivity it would cause greater harm Smith v leech brain- Defendants negligently burnt plaintiff lips causing cancer, was held liable. Page v smith- accident cause MH to relapse, defendants liable Existing physical states (eggshell skull rule)