1) The letter summarizes a video showing the SDM of Karnal, Haryana instructing police officers to ensure protesting farmers receive "head injuries".
2) It argues this violates the farmers' fundamental right to peaceful protest under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution.
3) The letter calls for accountability and states no public officer is above the law, requesting the Chief Justice to urgently look into the matter to prevent injustice and protect the democratic fabric of the country.
What sections of AFSPA are opposed by activists?
Critically examine AFSPA, its history, uses, causes for its opposition, legal view of Courts and current debate surrounding it
Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association (EEVFAM) & Anr. .....Pet...bgogoi
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.129 OF 2012
Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association (EEVFAM)
& Anr. .....Petitioners
versus
Union of India & Anr. ….Respondents
J U D G M E N T
Armed Forces, Taliban, FRC and Actions in Aid of Civil Power in FATA (report,...fatanews
See page 37 for information on use of Actions in Aid of Civil Power and the Frontier Crimes Regulation for illegal detention and violation of human rights. Also see recommendations at end of report regarding repeal of FCR and other suggestions. || Subscribe to our email newsletter at http://eepurl.com/qnf75
DENIED - Failures in accountability for human rights violations by security f...Amnesty India
This report documents obstacles to justice for victims of human rights violations existing in both law and practice in Jammu and Kashmir, and shows how the government’s response to reports of human rights violations has failed to deliver justice for several victims and families. In writing this report, Amnesty International India analyzed government and legal documents related to over 100 cases of human rights violations committed between 1990 and 2013, and interviewed families of victims, their lawyers, journalists, academics, civil society activists, and state and central authorities.
Elections and institutions need to be combined with a third element – enjoyment of rights – to make a government democratic. Even the most properly elected rulers working through the established institutional process must learn not to cross some limits. Citizens’ democratic rights set those limits in a democracy.
This is what we take up in this chapter. We begin by discussing some real life cases to imagine what it means to live without rights. This leads to a discussion on what we mean by rights and why do we need them. As in the previous chapters, the general discussion is followed by a focus on India. We discuss one by one the Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution. Then we turn to how these rights can be used by ordinary citizens. Who will protect and enforce them? Finally we take a look at how the scope of rights has been expanding.
Human rights violations are actions or behaviors that infringe upon the fundamental rights and freedoms to which all individuals are entitled by virtue of being human. These violations can occur at various levels, from the actions of individuals or local authorities to systemic abuses by governments or other entities. Here are some common examples of human rights violations:
1. **Torture and Inhumane Treatment:** The use of physical or psychological torture, cruel, or degrading treatment is a direct violation of the right to be free from torture and inhumane treatment.
2. **Arbitrary Detention:** Holding individuals in custody without due process or without legal justification is a violation of the right to liberty and security of the person.
3. **Extrajudicial Killings:** Unlawful or summary executions by government officials or law enforcement agencies violate the right to life.
4. **Freedom of Expression:** Censorship, restrictions on the media, and persecution of journalists infringe upon the right to freedom of expression.
5. **Freedom of Assembly and Association:** When governments suppress peaceful protests, ban political parties, or hinder the formation of civil society groups, they violate the rights to freedom of assembly and association.
6. **Discrimination:** Discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, or other factors infringes on the principle of equality and non-discrimination.
7. **Forced Labor and Human Trafficking:** Coercing individuals to work against their will or trafficking them for exploitative purposes is a grave violation of their human rights.
8. **Child Labor and Child Soldiers:** Using children for labor or as soldiers deprives them of their rights to education, safety, and freedom from exploitation.
9. **Violence Against Women:** Domestic violence, sexual assault, and harmful traditional practices such as female genital mutilation violate the rights of women to live free from violence and discrimination.
10. **Denial of Education:** Preventing access to quality education, especially for girls and marginalized groups, denies them their right to education.
11. **Religious Persecution:** Discrimination and violence against individuals based on their religious beliefs violate their right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.
12. **Refugee and Asylum Seeker Rights:** Denying asylum seekers their right to seek refuge from persecution is a violation of their rights as refugees.
13. **Right to Adequate Housing:** Forcible eviction, homelessness, and inadequate housing conditions infringe on the right to a standard of living.
14. **Environmental and Indigenous Rights:** Violations against indigenous communities' land rights and the destruction of the environment can have severe human rights implications.
15. **Privacy Violations:** Surveillance, data breaches, and invasions of privacy without just cause infringe on the right to privacy.
It's important to note tha
sagar suryawanshi pune is best known for his cases regarding the filtering of content on social media where he also demanded the Election Commission of India
This presentation is a series of five presentations on Anna Hazare the phenomena. Different sociological, psychological, anthropological, political aspects of Indian society will be analysed and a prognosis is made on he is going to succeed in his crusade with explanations.
Shri Justice C. Praveen Kumar, Hon'ble Former Acting Chief Justice of AP High Court, Amaravathi, has delivered the 2nd Neelam Sanjiva Reddy Memorial Lecture on 'Human Rights and the Article 21 of the Constitution of India', on 19 May, 2024 at Tirupati, organised by Academy of Grassroots Studies and Research of India (AGRASRI), Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, on the eve of the 111th Birth Anniversary Celebrations of Shri Neelam Sanjiva Reddy, the 6th President of India and the First Chief Minister of United Andhra Pradesh.
What sections of AFSPA are opposed by activists?
Critically examine AFSPA, its history, uses, causes for its opposition, legal view of Courts and current debate surrounding it
Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association (EEVFAM) & Anr. .....Pet...bgogoi
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.129 OF 2012
Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association (EEVFAM)
& Anr. .....Petitioners
versus
Union of India & Anr. ….Respondents
J U D G M E N T
Armed Forces, Taliban, FRC and Actions in Aid of Civil Power in FATA (report,...fatanews
See page 37 for information on use of Actions in Aid of Civil Power and the Frontier Crimes Regulation for illegal detention and violation of human rights. Also see recommendations at end of report regarding repeal of FCR and other suggestions. || Subscribe to our email newsletter at http://eepurl.com/qnf75
DENIED - Failures in accountability for human rights violations by security f...Amnesty India
This report documents obstacles to justice for victims of human rights violations existing in both law and practice in Jammu and Kashmir, and shows how the government’s response to reports of human rights violations has failed to deliver justice for several victims and families. In writing this report, Amnesty International India analyzed government and legal documents related to over 100 cases of human rights violations committed between 1990 and 2013, and interviewed families of victims, their lawyers, journalists, academics, civil society activists, and state and central authorities.
Elections and institutions need to be combined with a third element – enjoyment of rights – to make a government democratic. Even the most properly elected rulers working through the established institutional process must learn not to cross some limits. Citizens’ democratic rights set those limits in a democracy.
This is what we take up in this chapter. We begin by discussing some real life cases to imagine what it means to live without rights. This leads to a discussion on what we mean by rights and why do we need them. As in the previous chapters, the general discussion is followed by a focus on India. We discuss one by one the Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution. Then we turn to how these rights can be used by ordinary citizens. Who will protect and enforce them? Finally we take a look at how the scope of rights has been expanding.
Human rights violations are actions or behaviors that infringe upon the fundamental rights and freedoms to which all individuals are entitled by virtue of being human. These violations can occur at various levels, from the actions of individuals or local authorities to systemic abuses by governments or other entities. Here are some common examples of human rights violations:
1. **Torture and Inhumane Treatment:** The use of physical or psychological torture, cruel, or degrading treatment is a direct violation of the right to be free from torture and inhumane treatment.
2. **Arbitrary Detention:** Holding individuals in custody without due process or without legal justification is a violation of the right to liberty and security of the person.
3. **Extrajudicial Killings:** Unlawful or summary executions by government officials or law enforcement agencies violate the right to life.
4. **Freedom of Expression:** Censorship, restrictions on the media, and persecution of journalists infringe upon the right to freedom of expression.
5. **Freedom of Assembly and Association:** When governments suppress peaceful protests, ban political parties, or hinder the formation of civil society groups, they violate the rights to freedom of assembly and association.
6. **Discrimination:** Discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, or other factors infringes on the principle of equality and non-discrimination.
7. **Forced Labor and Human Trafficking:** Coercing individuals to work against their will or trafficking them for exploitative purposes is a grave violation of their human rights.
8. **Child Labor and Child Soldiers:** Using children for labor or as soldiers deprives them of their rights to education, safety, and freedom from exploitation.
9. **Violence Against Women:** Domestic violence, sexual assault, and harmful traditional practices such as female genital mutilation violate the rights of women to live free from violence and discrimination.
10. **Denial of Education:** Preventing access to quality education, especially for girls and marginalized groups, denies them their right to education.
11. **Religious Persecution:** Discrimination and violence against individuals based on their religious beliefs violate their right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.
12. **Refugee and Asylum Seeker Rights:** Denying asylum seekers their right to seek refuge from persecution is a violation of their rights as refugees.
13. **Right to Adequate Housing:** Forcible eviction, homelessness, and inadequate housing conditions infringe on the right to a standard of living.
14. **Environmental and Indigenous Rights:** Violations against indigenous communities' land rights and the destruction of the environment can have severe human rights implications.
15. **Privacy Violations:** Surveillance, data breaches, and invasions of privacy without just cause infringe on the right to privacy.
It's important to note tha
sagar suryawanshi pune is best known for his cases regarding the filtering of content on social media where he also demanded the Election Commission of India
This presentation is a series of five presentations on Anna Hazare the phenomena. Different sociological, psychological, anthropological, political aspects of Indian society will be analysed and a prognosis is made on he is going to succeed in his crusade with explanations.
Shri Justice C. Praveen Kumar, Hon'ble Former Acting Chief Justice of AP High Court, Amaravathi, has delivered the 2nd Neelam Sanjiva Reddy Memorial Lecture on 'Human Rights and the Article 21 of the Constitution of India', on 19 May, 2024 at Tirupati, organised by Academy of Grassroots Studies and Research of India (AGRASRI), Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, on the eve of the 111th Birth Anniversary Celebrations of Shri Neelam Sanjiva Reddy, the 6th President of India and the First Chief Minister of United Andhra Pradesh.
A Question of Bail
A five-judge Constitution bench takes a fresh look at pre-conviction bail. By insisting on avoidance of reflexive reasons for denying bail, the apex court has acted progressively, says Prof Upendra Baxi
MY SCHOOL PPT(HARSHA SAI)
Contant me by:
educationtrain954@gmail.com
please visit my youtube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTFT1d7-5pGDFCNH39okHaQ
According to Bhagwati, J., Article 21 “embodies a constitutional value of supreme importance in a democratic society.” Iyer, J., has characterized Article 21 as “the procedural magna carta protective of life and liberty.
This right has been held to be the heart of the Constitution, the most organic and progressive provision in our living constitution, the foundation of our laws.
Article 21 can only be claimed when a person is deprived of his “life” or “personal liberty” by the “State” as defined in Article 12. Violation of the right by private individuals is not within the preview of Article 21.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
To chief justice of punjab and haryana high court (1)
1. TO CHIEF JUSTICE OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
An open letter to Hon’ble Chief justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court Regarding
SDM Karnal Ayush Sinha’s conduct toward peaceful protest of farmers.
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
Respected Lordship,
Article 19(1) (a) of the Indian constitution “Freedom of speech and expression” is a
fundamental right given to its citizen against the state, which includes carrying out
the peaceful public demonstration.
That on 28th
, August, 2021 Karnal's Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) Ayush Sinha
IAS is seen instructing policemen that no protesting farmer should go beyond a
certain barricade in the area, video showing a top district official in Haryana asking
policemen to ensure farmers who are protesting against BJP leaders get "Head
injuries" has surfaced on social media.
Then after a statement came from the said SDM “that it was said during the briefing
to use force proportionately”
We have seen this video and it cause a great disturbance in society that how a
Public servant is behaving like a dictator, the video can be compared with the
General Dyer’s orders to kill Indians who are protesting peacefully, The man behind
2. the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and the man behind the karnal incident is not much
differ ideologically.
We as citizen of India will remember this day as Black day in history of India but as
an Advocate we can’t live peacefully even a day after witnessing this incidence.
Only question that will always be in our mind is that are we not enough capable to
safeguard our constitution?
As an Advocate we are soldiers and first duty as a soldier is to safeguard
constitution, incidents like this not only just kills self-esteem of an Advocate but it
kills the trust which is incurred upon the public officers and on other guards of
constitutions.
In fact, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in “Maneka Gandhi vs The Union of India (1978)”
case ruled that every citizen must have the right to participate in the democratic
process, which allows exercising ones rights to make a choice, as well as free and
general discussions on public issues which are absolutely essential. From the legal
angle, the Constitution of India, guarantees the right to peaceful protest, which is
strongly protected under Article 19, though the word “protest” is not mentioned
explicitly:
• Article 19(1)(a): Freedom of Speech and Expression.
• Article 19 (1)(b): Right to protest peacefully without arms.
• Article 19 (1) (c): Right to form associations and Unions.
However, these provisions extend to peaceful protests.
Now when a peaceful protest is going on and top district official in Haryana is asking
policemen to ensure farmers who are protesting against BJP leaders get "Head
injuries”
It is not unknown to any one of our country that on 13th
April, 1919, A large but
peaceful crowd had gathered at the ‘Jallianwala
Bagh’ in Amritsar, Punjab to protest against the arrest of pro-Indian independence
leaders Dr. Saifuddin Kitchlu and Dr. Satya Pal. In response to the public gathering,
the British Brigadier-General R. E. H. Dyer surrounded the Bagh with his soldiers, In
independent India on 28/8/2021 farmers are protesting peacefully, for their rights,
District official of Karnal, Haryana ‘Ayush Sinha IAS’ acts like General Dyer.
‘Dyer’ ordered his army to shoot at the crowd, continuing to fire even
as protestors tried to flee. The troops kept on firing until their ammunition was
exhausted. At least 1000 people were killed and over 1,200 other people were injured
of whom 192 were seriously injured. Just like that after years history repeats itself
but the matter of shame is this time a public servant specially trained to serve the
3. public act like General Dyer, Ayush Sinha ordered his police mans to give “Head
injuries” to peaceful protestor.
The level of casual brutality, and lack of any accountability, stunned the entire nation.
What happened with General Dyer is we all know that.
We are living in a democratic country and if we are truly in a democratic country and
persons like Ayush Sinha should be behinds the bars. Nobody is above the law.
If law can give powers to these officers and when they become incompetent to
perform the public duties same law can take these powers back which are being
used unlawfully against the constitution.
Farmers Protest- Protest is part of fundamental rights-Farmers’ protest should be
allowed to continue without impediment and without any breach of peace. See-
Rakesh Vaishnav v. Union of India, (SC): Law Finder Doc Id # 1785305;
So, in the light of facts and circumstances being the incident of grave violations of
human rights by the Haryana Police and by an IAS officer, We urge you Sir to look
into this matter with the urgency.
This must be done immediately in order to stop the gross injustice which is
tarnishing the fabric of our Constitution and causing colossal damage to the sheen
of a democratic country.
History will not pardon us if we remain mute spectators to this violation of human
rights.
Regards,
Hakam Singh
Advocate
Office-73, CCC Shoping Mall, Cgandigarh;
Ajitpal Singh Mander
Advocate
President, Bar Association Phul,
District Bathinda
YUVRAJ SINGH
Advocate
Chamber No.445, Jalandhar.