The document discusses freedom of information and open government. It summarizes the benefits of open government to the public, including businesses, and to the government. It also discusses how freedom of information laws affect businesses by requiring public disclosure of some information they submit to the government. While freedom of information laws protect trade secrets and confidential commercial information from disclosure, the meaning and scope of these exemptions has been interpreted by courts through many cases.
Comparing EU and Council of Europe Data Protection Standards in the Context o...David Erdos
In the event of Brexit, the UK will leave the EU Charter, the GDPR and related EU instruments. It will, however, remain committed not only to achieving EU ‘adequacy’ standard but doing this within the framework of Council of Europe’s Data Protection Convention 108+. These slides therefore explore the commonalities and contrasts between EU DP and Convention 108+. Both have a similar scope and common principles. However, Convention 108+'s transparency and sensitive data rules are considerably less stringent and there are many fewer compulsory controller discipline provisions. Whilst only modest change should be expected initially as the UK will essentially replicate the GDPR in the short-term, this less prescriptive and more flexible approach is likely to exert an influence on UK data protection should Brexit happen.
The UK and EU Personal Data Regime After Brexit: Another Switzerland?David Erdos
These slides provide an overview of the personal data relationship between the UK and EU after Brexit. Under the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, the UK will have the closest connection with the EU here outside the European Economic Area and Switzerland. This is especially clear in the area of justice and security where there is very extensive provision for data exchange based on common standards. However, in the general area of data protection the framework only points to mutual adequacy. Even with the evolving formulation of this as “essential equivalence”, significant flexibility is retained and this may ultimately result in more substantive divergence than EU-Switzerland given the UK’s more distinct data protection approach. Common bona fide implementation of the Council of Europe’s Data Protection Convention 108+ may provide a good lodestar in the medium term and I very tentatively map out what this may could mean for default standards in the UK related to sensitive data and integrity and also specific substantive restrictions to ensure a more graduated approach and reconciliation with other competing rights.
Comparing EU and Council of Europe Data Protection Standards in the Context o...David Erdos
In the event of Brexit, the UK will leave the EU Charter, the GDPR and related EU instruments. It will, however, remain committed not only to achieving EU ‘adequacy’ standard but doing this within the framework of Council of Europe’s Data Protection Convention 108+. These slides therefore explore the commonalities and contrasts between EU DP and Convention 108+. Both have a similar scope and common principles. However, Convention 108+'s transparency and sensitive data rules are considerably less stringent and there are many fewer compulsory controller discipline provisions. Whilst only modest change should be expected initially as the UK will essentially replicate the GDPR in the short-term, this less prescriptive and more flexible approach is likely to exert an influence on UK data protection should Brexit happen.
The UK and EU Personal Data Regime After Brexit: Another Switzerland?David Erdos
These slides provide an overview of the personal data relationship between the UK and EU after Brexit. Under the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, the UK will have the closest connection with the EU here outside the European Economic Area and Switzerland. This is especially clear in the area of justice and security where there is very extensive provision for data exchange based on common standards. However, in the general area of data protection the framework only points to mutual adequacy. Even with the evolving formulation of this as “essential equivalence”, significant flexibility is retained and this may ultimately result in more substantive divergence than EU-Switzerland given the UK’s more distinct data protection approach. Common bona fide implementation of the Council of Europe’s Data Protection Convention 108+ may provide a good lodestar in the medium term and I very tentatively map out what this may could mean for default standards in the UK related to sensitive data and integrity and also specific substantive restrictions to ensure a more graduated approach and reconciliation with other competing rights.
GDPR, DPAs and the Journalistic Media: Walking the Regulatory TightropeDavid Erdos
How is and should the future of data protection regulation of the journalistic media develop under the GDPR? State law in this area remains highly divergent but the great majority do recognise that qualified data protection requirements and partial regulatory supervision should apply here. This points to a continuing, albeit sensitive, role for DPAs. But these authorities have many other demands and remain highly resource constrained. It is argued that a co-regulatory synergy between self- and statutory regulation provide the best mechanism to elucidate the necessary detailed balanced standards and for monitoring these. DPAs should develop a strategic approach including through according greater deference to self-regulatory bodies which take data protection standards and this balancing task seriously. The codes of conduct and monitoring provisions in articles 40 and 41 of the GDPR may be deployed directly here or at least provide a guide for a sui generis approach, with the new European Data Protection Board playing a facilitative rather than a controlling role.
N.B. These slides are based on a talk I gave at a joint HEC Paris Law Department and Science Po Law School seminar on 30 November 2018. I am grateful for the feedback I received there.
N.N.B. Please note that the chart in Slide Six unfortunately failed to display that as of Autumn 2018 approximately 40% of statutory data protection laws enacted by EEA jurisdictions still subject journalism to full DPA supervision.
Data Protection and Journalism: The Changing LandscapeDavid Erdos
These slides provide an overview of the changing landscape for data protection and journalism in decade or so since the Leveson Inquiry. As well as detailing the core public interest and incompatibility tests, they look at developments in case law, at the ICO and under the GDPR and DPA 2018. They are intended to provide background to the ICO consultation on a data protection and journalism code of practice which runs until 10 January 2022.
New Media Internet Expression and European Data ProtectionDavid Erdos
These slides are based on my keynote address to the Maison Française d'Oxford conference "Data Privacy Law: Policy and Legal Challenges", 20 November 2015. Drawing on both doctrinal analysis and a survey of European Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) it makes four key claims about law and practice as entrenched in C-131/12 Google Spain (2014). Firstly, both the Court of Justice and especially European DPAs have adopted an expansive interpretative stance as regards data protection applied to internet expression. Secondly, that paradigm has serious implications for a range of internet actors beyond search engines. Thirdly, enforcement has been both limited and sporadic. Fourthly, a focus by DPAs on enforcement can result in the production of detailed guidance which "reads down" the law and therefore is some tension with the expansive interpretative stance generally adopted, the implementation of the Google Spain decision against search engines being a case in point.
The GDPR: What About Data Stored or Transmitted Outside the EU?TAG Alliances
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): What About Data Stored or Transmitted Outside the EU? Written by: Rutger Ketting of Nysingh advocaten-notarissen N.V. (Apeldoorn, The Netherlands - TAGLaw).
Constitutional Privacy and Data Protection in the EUDavid Erdos
Although both data protection and the right to privacy (or respect for private life) are recognised within the EU Charter, they are otherwise generally seen as having very different constitutional histories. The right of privacy is often seen as traditional and data protection as novel. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis of rights within EU State constitutions, it can be shown that this distinction is overdrawn. Only five current EU States recognised a constitutional right to privacy prior to 1990, although approximately three quarters and also the European Convention do so today. Subsidiary constitutional rights related to the home and correspondence but not honour and/or reputation are more long-standing and this helps link the core of privacy to the protection of intimacy. Constitutional rights to data protection emerged roughly contemporaneously and were often linked to a general right to privacy but are still only found in around half of EU States. There is also no clear consensus on specific guarantees, although around half of the States which recognise these do include rights to transparency and a slightly lower number right to rectification. This could suggest that data subject empowerment over a wide range of connected information is an important emerging particularity tied to data protection as a constitutional guarantee.
Dead Ringers? Legal Persons & the Deceased in European Data Protection LawDavid Erdos
Whilst it is sometimes suggested that the treatment of legal and deceased person data during European data protection’s development has been broadly comparable, this presentation demonstrates the stark divergences which are in fact apparent. Despite early fusion, legal persons have been increasingly seen to have lesser and, more importantly, qualitatively different information entitlements compared to natural persons, thereby leaving European data protection with a very limited and indirect role here. In contrast, natural persons and the deceased have not been conceived as normatively dichotomous and since the 1990s there has been growing interest both in establishing sui generis direct protection for deceased data and also indirect inclusion through a link with living natural persons. Whilst the case for some indirect inclusion is overwhelming, a broad approach to the inter-relational nature of data risks further destabilizing the personal data concept. Nevertheless, given that jurisdictions representing almost half of the EEA’s population now provide some direct protection and the challenges of managing digital data on death continue to grow, the time may be ripe for a ‘soft’ recommendation on direct protection in this area. Drawing on existing law and scholarship, such a recommendation could seek to specify the role of both specific control rights and diffuse confidentiality obligations, the criteria for time-limits in each case and the need for a balance with other rights and interests which recognises the significantly decreasing interest in protection over time. N.B. The full working paper accompanying these slides may be found at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3599852
Data Protection Guide – What are your rights as a citizen?Edouard Nguyen
Guide UK Data Protection Law EUROPA - Internal Market - Data Protection - Data Protection Guide – What are your rights as a citizen?http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/guide/guide-ukingdom_en.pdf
Transatlantic data flows following the Schrems II judgmentblogzilla
Brief summary of Ian Brown and Douwe Korff’s study for the European Parliament Civil Liberties Committee, presented at a committee hearing on 9 November 2021
"Information Compliance - Freedom of Information, Data Protection and Librari...Terry O'Brien
"Information Compliance - FoI, data protection and libraries". Presentation given by Terry O'Brien at Joint English / Irish IIUG Conference, Institute of Technology, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland, June 2009
Data Protection and "Intermediary" Responsibility: An Historical PerspectiveDavid Erdos
These slides look historically at the tension between being in "control" of personal data and benefiting from certain freedom of expression shields when acting as an “intermediary” between an original content producer and an end user. It is show that these tensions emerged as early as the 1980s in European data protection, with both the French and certain Scandinavian Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) adopting a strict construction of law vis-à-vis provides of interactive services on the Minitel and various news archive and other public databases respectively. By the late 1990s when the e-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC was being negotiated a similar tension re-emerged in the form of the data protection “exemption” (art. 1(5)(b)) and the more general ambiguity as to whether “active” as opposed to “passive” services could benefit from the “host” shield (art. 14) in any case. A partial solution to the latter question was found in the reasonable “duties of care” preamble inserted in the instrument as recital 48. These early debates cast a new perspective on more contemporary developments in EU data protection and e-Commerce case law including C-131/12 Google Spain, C-507/17 Google v CNIL and C-18/18 Glawischnig-Piesczek.
GDPR, DPAs and the Journalistic Media: Walking the Regulatory TightropeDavid Erdos
How is and should the future of data protection regulation of the journalistic media develop under the GDPR? State law in this area remains highly divergent but the great majority do recognise that qualified data protection requirements and partial regulatory supervision should apply here. This points to a continuing, albeit sensitive, role for DPAs. But these authorities have many other demands and remain highly resource constrained. It is argued that a co-regulatory synergy between self- and statutory regulation provide the best mechanism to elucidate the necessary detailed balanced standards and for monitoring these. DPAs should develop a strategic approach including through according greater deference to self-regulatory bodies which take data protection standards and this balancing task seriously. The codes of conduct and monitoring provisions in articles 40 and 41 of the GDPR may be deployed directly here or at least provide a guide for a sui generis approach, with the new European Data Protection Board playing a facilitative rather than a controlling role.
N.B. These slides are based on a talk I gave at a joint HEC Paris Law Department and Science Po Law School seminar on 30 November 2018. I am grateful for the feedback I received there.
N.N.B. Please note that the chart in Slide Six unfortunately failed to display that as of Autumn 2018 approximately 40% of statutory data protection laws enacted by EEA jurisdictions still subject journalism to full DPA supervision.
Data Protection and Journalism: The Changing LandscapeDavid Erdos
These slides provide an overview of the changing landscape for data protection and journalism in decade or so since the Leveson Inquiry. As well as detailing the core public interest and incompatibility tests, they look at developments in case law, at the ICO and under the GDPR and DPA 2018. They are intended to provide background to the ICO consultation on a data protection and journalism code of practice which runs until 10 January 2022.
New Media Internet Expression and European Data ProtectionDavid Erdos
These slides are based on my keynote address to the Maison Française d'Oxford conference "Data Privacy Law: Policy and Legal Challenges", 20 November 2015. Drawing on both doctrinal analysis and a survey of European Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) it makes four key claims about law and practice as entrenched in C-131/12 Google Spain (2014). Firstly, both the Court of Justice and especially European DPAs have adopted an expansive interpretative stance as regards data protection applied to internet expression. Secondly, that paradigm has serious implications for a range of internet actors beyond search engines. Thirdly, enforcement has been both limited and sporadic. Fourthly, a focus by DPAs on enforcement can result in the production of detailed guidance which "reads down" the law and therefore is some tension with the expansive interpretative stance generally adopted, the implementation of the Google Spain decision against search engines being a case in point.
The GDPR: What About Data Stored or Transmitted Outside the EU?TAG Alliances
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): What About Data Stored or Transmitted Outside the EU? Written by: Rutger Ketting of Nysingh advocaten-notarissen N.V. (Apeldoorn, The Netherlands - TAGLaw).
Constitutional Privacy and Data Protection in the EUDavid Erdos
Although both data protection and the right to privacy (or respect for private life) are recognised within the EU Charter, they are otherwise generally seen as having very different constitutional histories. The right of privacy is often seen as traditional and data protection as novel. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis of rights within EU State constitutions, it can be shown that this distinction is overdrawn. Only five current EU States recognised a constitutional right to privacy prior to 1990, although approximately three quarters and also the European Convention do so today. Subsidiary constitutional rights related to the home and correspondence but not honour and/or reputation are more long-standing and this helps link the core of privacy to the protection of intimacy. Constitutional rights to data protection emerged roughly contemporaneously and were often linked to a general right to privacy but are still only found in around half of EU States. There is also no clear consensus on specific guarantees, although around half of the States which recognise these do include rights to transparency and a slightly lower number right to rectification. This could suggest that data subject empowerment over a wide range of connected information is an important emerging particularity tied to data protection as a constitutional guarantee.
Dead Ringers? Legal Persons & the Deceased in European Data Protection LawDavid Erdos
Whilst it is sometimes suggested that the treatment of legal and deceased person data during European data protection’s development has been broadly comparable, this presentation demonstrates the stark divergences which are in fact apparent. Despite early fusion, legal persons have been increasingly seen to have lesser and, more importantly, qualitatively different information entitlements compared to natural persons, thereby leaving European data protection with a very limited and indirect role here. In contrast, natural persons and the deceased have not been conceived as normatively dichotomous and since the 1990s there has been growing interest both in establishing sui generis direct protection for deceased data and also indirect inclusion through a link with living natural persons. Whilst the case for some indirect inclusion is overwhelming, a broad approach to the inter-relational nature of data risks further destabilizing the personal data concept. Nevertheless, given that jurisdictions representing almost half of the EEA’s population now provide some direct protection and the challenges of managing digital data on death continue to grow, the time may be ripe for a ‘soft’ recommendation on direct protection in this area. Drawing on existing law and scholarship, such a recommendation could seek to specify the role of both specific control rights and diffuse confidentiality obligations, the criteria for time-limits in each case and the need for a balance with other rights and interests which recognises the significantly decreasing interest in protection over time. N.B. The full working paper accompanying these slides may be found at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3599852
Data Protection Guide – What are your rights as a citizen?Edouard Nguyen
Guide UK Data Protection Law EUROPA - Internal Market - Data Protection - Data Protection Guide – What are your rights as a citizen?http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/guide/guide-ukingdom_en.pdf
Transatlantic data flows following the Schrems II judgmentblogzilla
Brief summary of Ian Brown and Douwe Korff’s study for the European Parliament Civil Liberties Committee, presented at a committee hearing on 9 November 2021
"Information Compliance - Freedom of Information, Data Protection and Librari...Terry O'Brien
"Information Compliance - FoI, data protection and libraries". Presentation given by Terry O'Brien at Joint English / Irish IIUG Conference, Institute of Technology, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland, June 2009
Data Protection and "Intermediary" Responsibility: An Historical PerspectiveDavid Erdos
These slides look historically at the tension between being in "control" of personal data and benefiting from certain freedom of expression shields when acting as an “intermediary” between an original content producer and an end user. It is show that these tensions emerged as early as the 1980s in European data protection, with both the French and certain Scandinavian Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) adopting a strict construction of law vis-à-vis provides of interactive services on the Minitel and various news archive and other public databases respectively. By the late 1990s when the e-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC was being negotiated a similar tension re-emerged in the form of the data protection “exemption” (art. 1(5)(b)) and the more general ambiguity as to whether “active” as opposed to “passive” services could benefit from the “host” shield (art. 14) in any case. A partial solution to the latter question was found in the reasonable “duties of care” preamble inserted in the instrument as recital 48. These early debates cast a new perspective on more contemporary developments in EU data protection and e-Commerce case law including C-131/12 Google Spain, C-507/17 Google v CNIL and C-18/18 Glawischnig-Piesczek.
Methodologies for mandatory disclosure initiatives
Host country legislation: Philippines Freedom of Information Bill 3732/Bill 3308
Filomeno Sta. Ana, Action for Economic Reforms, Philippines
Protecting Third Party Information under FOI LegislationRichard Austin
Examination of the protection available for vendor confidential information in public sector procurements in light of client concerns for public accountability and disclosure (including under FOI legislation).
This presentation discusses new federal legislation to protect trade secrets and provides concrete, pragmatic advice about how to respond to this new development.
Morse Slides For Conference Board Merger Integration Program June 25, 2009morsemh
Slides presented to the Conference Board 2009 Post-Merger Integration Conference, Getting Past the Antitrust Hurdle, What has Changed? What is the Same? June 25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
Chapter 9Many businesses have utilized the services of the Ameri.docxchristinemaritza
Chapter 9
Many businesses have utilized the services of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), well known for its role in shaping conservative legislation and lobbying influ- ence. It has advocated against health care reform, to reduce state taxes on businesses, and to limit the political influence of labor unions. ALEC also was instrumental in many states in the creation of “stand your ground” laws, under which citizens were given the right to use guns or other weapons to protect themselves against assailants. After the public back- lash in the Treyvon Martin case in 2012—in which a black teenager was shot to death in Florida and his assailant defended his actions by claiming protection under Florida’s “stand your ground” law—many businesses began to distance themselves from ALEC. In 2012 Walmart joined other firms, such as Amazon.com, Coca-Cola, Kraft Foods, McDonald’s, General Electric, Sprint Nextel, and a dozen more, bending to pressure from civil rights groups. Walmart was the largest seller of firearms in the country and the largest employer of black workers and thus particularly vulnerable to protests surrounding the Treyvon Martin case. Walmart’s public affairs vice president explained the company’s action by saying, “ALEC had strayed from its core mission to advance the Jeffersonian principles of free markets.”
One industry that has been active in the political arena is solar power. Because solar energy has historically been more expensive to produce than fossil fuel energy, the indus- try has relied heavily on government incentives and subsidies to level the playing field. Although some major energy companies have entered the solar business, most of the 3,400 solar companies in the United States are small, such as Namasté Solar, a Boulder, Colorado, firm of 60 employees that installs solar energy systems for commercial and residential customers. The solar industry’s trade association, the Solar Energy Industries Association, has been very active in government affairs and advocacy, winning a number of policy victories. The federal stimulus bills of 2008 and 2009 provided tax credits, grants, and loans for solar installations and companies that made solar equipment (one of which, Solyndra, later failed). States—such as Hawaii, which required all new construc- tion to have solar water heaters by 2010—and cities—such as Berkeley, California, which loans money to residents to install solar panels—have also helped the industry with friendly policies.1
As the examples above demonstrate, many businesses—big and small—have become active participants in the political process to promote a variety of goals, from supporting organizations charged with developing legislation to support economic development and job growth to lobbying government regulators through a trade association to receive tax credits and grants. They are not always successful, however, as seen in the political part- nership of businesses with ALEC, which took on a ...
In this presentation, Catherine Coulter discusses the Federal Privacy Law and how this can affect your company. Touching on privacy in corporate transactions, Canada-USA cross border data transfers and the Federal Privacy Commissioner Guidelines, learn how to act if your organization finds itself in a breach situation.
What You Need To Know About Privacy - Now!Now Dentons
This presentation gives an update on Federal Privacy Law, privacy in corporate transactions, Canada-USA Cross-Border Data Transfers and federal privacy commissioner.
Protecting The Crown Jewels: Trade Secrets and Non-Disclosure Agreements Part IJohn Watkins
These are the slides from Part 1 of our video podcast on Trade Secrets and Non-Disclosure Agreements. The presentation with audio is available at www.ctflegal.blip.tv
110 CHAPTER FOURLegal, Regulatory, and Political Iss.docxpaynetawnya
110
CHAPTER FOUR
Legal, Regulatory,
and Political Issues
Chapter Objectives
●● To understand the rationale for
government regulation of business
●● To examine the key legislation that
structures the legal environment for
business
●● To analyze the role of regulatory agencies
in the enforcement of public policy
●● To compare the costs and benefits of
regulation
●● To examine how business participates in
and influences public policy
●● To describe the government’s approach
for legal and ethical compliance
Chapter Outline
Government’s Influence on Business
The Contemporary Political Environment
The Government’s Strategic Approach for
Legal and Ethical Compliance
02/18/2018 - RS0000000000000000000000973322 - BUSINESS and SOCIETY 5th edition
111
In the technology industry, protecting one’s intellectual
property through patents is crucial to the survival of
a company. A patent gives an organization such as
Microsoft a temporary monopoly over a new technol-
ogy. Patents are intended to reward firms for the risks
they take in developing new products. They not only
allow the firms to recoup their investment but also
give them the chance to earn a significant profit. This
prompts technology firms to constantly innovate and
stay ahead of the competition by patenting new items.
Companies will often file lawsuits seeking dam-
ages from those they believe violated their intellectual
property rights. One well-publicized case occurred
between two titans of the cell phone industry, Apple
and Samsung. After Apple introduced its iconic iPhone,
Samsung came out with its own smartphone called
Galaxy S. Apple filed a lawsuit against Samsung, accus-
ing it of violating its iPhone patent by copying many
components of the iPhone, including the rectangular
shape; the black color of the phone; the tap to zoom,
the flip to rotate, the slide to scroll features; and so
on. It also claimed that Samsung copied features of its
iPad product.
Samsung countersued, claiming that many of
these components had already been patented by
Samsung; thus, Samsung—and not Apple—held the
intellectual property rights. The lawsuit soon snow-
balled, with suits being filed in the United States, South
Korea, Germany, Japan, and other areas. Many of these
countries came to different conclusions. For instance,
the United States found Samsung guilty of intellectual
property violations and ordered Samsung to pay Apple
$1 billion in damages (this was later reduced). However,
South Korea determined that Apple violated two
of Samsung’s patents, while Samsung violated one
of Apple’s. The United Kingdom ruled in favor of
Samsung, while Germany banned sales of the Galaxy
Tab 2.0 because of its similarities to Apple’s iPad 2.
The different court rulings demonstrate the com-
plexities of international regulations. The ethical and
legal standards of intellectual property vary from coun-
try to country, mak ...
I’m attaching some info on the agency I work for. I work remot.docxdonnajames55
I’m attaching some info on the agency I work for. I work remotely at New Heights Middle School in Jefferson SC as a behavioral health counselor. I have a LMSW; I provide counseling services to kids from age 12-14. I was drawn to this agency due to my desire to work with kids. My prior job was at palmetto pee dee behavioral health. The kids there had mostly conduct disorders. At CareSouth I can focus a lot on actual counseling and less case management. They also pay for ceus and provide clinical supervision. My self-care that I practice is just doing something nice for myself once a week. Because sometimes you give so much of yourself to others you will forget about you.
State Laws Protecting Citizen Information and
Breach Notification Laws
ISOL633 - Legal Regulations,
Compliance, and Investigation
Learning Objective
Describe state legal compliance laws addressing public and private institutions.
Key Concepts
State regulation of privacy and information security
State data breach notification
State encryption regulations
State data disposal regulations
History of state privacy protection laws
DISCOVER: CONCEPTS
California Notification Law
California Database Security Breach Notification Act
First breach notification law
Enacted on July 1, 2003
Purpose to give California residents timely information to protect themselves
Serves as model for other states
California Notification Law
Anyone who owns or uses computerized data containing unencrypted personal information
Anyone who owns or uses computerized data containing unencrypted personal information
7/1/2018
6
Who Must Comply?
State agencies
Private organiza-tions
Business
Any entity storing info on California residents
Nonprofit organiza-tions
Data Breach Notification Laws
Requirements to inform customers of a data breach
Civil and/or criminal penalties for failure to disclose
Private right of action
Exemptions from reporting
DISCOVER: PROCESS
Personal Information - Defined
The general definition of “personal Information” is:
Both the Individual’s first name/initial and last name
And one or more of
Social Security Number
Driver’s License / State ID Number
Financial Account/Credit/Debit number AND the PIN/code/password to access it
Does not include publicly available information legally obtainable by general public from governmental records.
Check out this PDF from Baker & Hostetler, LLP for a nice chart documenting where personal information is wider than the general definition.
Breach Notification Decision Making
If breach occurred or may have occurred and
Computer system contains personal information
Personal information was encrypted
No notification required
Breach Notification Decision Making
If breach occurred or may have occurred and
Computer system contains personal information
Personal information was not encrypted
Individuals must receive notice of security breach
DISCOVER: ROLES
Roles
Chief Infor.
[Note: This is a partial preview. To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
Sustainability has become an increasingly critical topic as the world recognizes the need to protect our planet and its resources for future generations. Sustainability means meeting our current needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. It involves long-term planning and consideration of the consequences of our actions. The goal is to create strategies that ensure the long-term viability of People, Planet, and Profit.
Leading companies such as Nike, Toyota, and Siemens are prioritizing sustainable innovation in their business models, setting an example for others to follow. In this Sustainability training presentation, you will learn key concepts, principles, and practices of sustainability applicable across industries. This training aims to create awareness and educate employees, senior executives, consultants, and other key stakeholders, including investors, policymakers, and supply chain partners, on the importance and implementation of sustainability.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Develop a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental principles and concepts that form the foundation of sustainability within corporate environments.
2. Explore the sustainability implementation model, focusing on effective measures and reporting strategies to track and communicate sustainability efforts.
3. Identify and define best practices and critical success factors essential for achieving sustainability goals within organizations.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction and Key Concepts of Sustainability
2. Principles and Practices of Sustainability
3. Measures and Reporting in Sustainability
4. Sustainability Implementation & Best Practices
To download the complete presentation, visit: https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
RMD24 | Retail media: hoe zet je dit in als je geen AH of Unilever bent? Heid...BBPMedia1
Grote partijen zijn al een tijdje onderweg met retail media. Ondertussen worden in dit domein ook de kansen zichtbaar voor andere spelers in de markt. Maar met die kansen ontstaan ook vragen: Zelf retail media worden of erop adverteren? In welke fase van de funnel past het en hoe integreer je het in een mediaplan? Wat is nu precies het verschil met marketplaces en Programmatic ads? In dit half uur beslechten we de dilemma's en krijg je antwoorden op wanneer het voor jou tijd is om de volgende stap te zetten.
Remote sensing and monitoring are changing the mining industry for the better. These are providing innovative solutions to long-standing challenges. Those related to exploration, extraction, and overall environmental management by mining technology companies Odisha. These technologies make use of satellite imaging, aerial photography and sensors to collect data that might be inaccessible or from hazardous locations. With the use of this technology, mining operations are becoming increasingly efficient. Let us gain more insight into the key aspects associated with remote sensing and monitoring when it comes to mining.
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdfKaiNexus
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
RMD24 | Debunking the non-endemic revenue myth Marvin Vacquier Droop | First ...BBPMedia1
Marvin neemt je in deze presentatie mee in de voordelen van non-endemic advertising op retail media netwerken. Hij brengt ook de uitdagingen in beeld die de markt op dit moment heeft op het gebied van retail media voor niet-leveranciers.
Retail media wordt gezien als het nieuwe advertising-medium en ook mediabureaus richten massaal retail media-afdelingen op. Merken die niet in de betreffende winkel liggen staan ook nog niet in de rij om op de retail media netwerken te adverteren. Marvin belicht de uitdagingen die er zijn om echt aansluiting te vinden op die markt van non-endemic advertising.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
Memorandum Of Association Constitution of Company.pptseri bangash
www.seribangash.com
A Memorandum of Association (MOA) is a legal document that outlines the fundamental principles and objectives upon which a company operates. It serves as the company's charter or constitution and defines the scope of its activities. Here's a detailed note on the MOA:
Contents of Memorandum of Association:
Name Clause: This clause states the name of the company, which should end with words like "Limited" or "Ltd." for a public limited company and "Private Limited" or "Pvt. Ltd." for a private limited company.
https://seribangash.com/article-of-association-is-legal-doc-of-company/
Registered Office Clause: It specifies the location where the company's registered office is situated. This office is where all official communications and notices are sent.
Objective Clause: This clause delineates the main objectives for which the company is formed. It's important to define these objectives clearly, as the company cannot undertake activities beyond those mentioned in this clause.
www.seribangash.com
Liability Clause: It outlines the extent of liability of the company's members. In the case of companies limited by shares, the liability of members is limited to the amount unpaid on their shares. For companies limited by guarantee, members' liability is limited to the amount they undertake to contribute if the company is wound up.
https://seribangash.com/promotors-is-person-conceived-formation-company/
Capital Clause: This clause specifies the authorized capital of the company, i.e., the maximum amount of share capital the company is authorized to issue. It also mentions the division of this capital into shares and their respective nominal value.
Association Clause: It simply states that the subscribers wish to form a company and agree to become members of it, in accordance with the terms of the MOA.
Importance of Memorandum of Association:
Legal Requirement: The MOA is a legal requirement for the formation of a company. It must be filed with the Registrar of Companies during the incorporation process.
Constitutional Document: It serves as the company's constitutional document, defining its scope, powers, and limitations.
Protection of Members: It protects the interests of the company's members by clearly defining the objectives and limiting their liability.
External Communication: It provides clarity to external parties, such as investors, creditors, and regulatory authorities, regarding the company's objectives and powers.
https://seribangash.com/difference-public-and-private-company-law/
Binding Authority: The company and its members are bound by the provisions of the MOA. Any action taken beyond its scope may be considered ultra vires (beyond the powers) of the company and therefore void.
Amendment of MOA:
While the MOA lays down the company's fundamental principles, it is not entirely immutable. It can be amended, but only under specific circumstances and in compliance with legal procedures. Amendments typically require shareholder
Buy Verified PayPal Account | Buy Google 5 Star Reviewsusawebmarket
Buy Verified PayPal Account
Looking to buy verified PayPal accounts? Discover 7 expert tips for safely purchasing a verified PayPal account in 2024. Ensure security and reliability for your transactions.
PayPal Services Features-
🟢 Email Access
🟢 Bank Added
🟢 Card Verified
🟢 Full SSN Provided
🟢 Phone Number Access
🟢 Driving License Copy
🟢 Fasted Delivery
Client Satisfaction is Our First priority. Our services is very appropriate to buy. We assume that the first-rate way to purchase our offerings is to order on the website. If you have any worry in our cooperation usually You can order us on Skype or Telegram.
24/7 Hours Reply/Please Contact
usawebmarketEmail: support@usawebmarket.com
Skype: usawebmarket
Telegram: @usawebmarket
WhatsApp: +1(218) 203-5951
USA WEB MARKET is the Best Verified PayPal, Payoneer, Cash App, Skrill, Neteller, Stripe Account and SEO, SMM Service provider.100%Satisfection granted.100% replacement Granted.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
![Freedom of Information Affects Public, Government, and Businesses ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()