This document outlines the requirements for the second critical thinking post due on January 8th, 2020, emphasizing the integration of personal opinion with course concepts and credible sources. Students must respond in 12 to 15 sentences to a question about the online versus print presence of a familiar magazine. Late submissions will not be graded, and responses should be well-written and proofread.

1. this is the second (of five)
Critical Thinking Posts
for the course. It must be posted on Canvas by 8pm on
Wednesday, January 8th, 2020
.
Remember, this is an opportunity for you to take a position on a
media and culture issue
using your informed opinion by the theory and concepts you
are learning about in this course.
Your answer must be a balance between what you think with
what you have read, watched, listened to (provided by Dr.
Dorsey-Elson), heard stated during a relevant mini-lecture
AND/OR information you attained from a credible source
(which you must state so that Dr. Dorsey-Elson can verify its
validity).
Your critical thinking writing post is completed correctly when
you respond directly to the questions that Dr. Dorsey-Elson
posts and you use complete sentences that are proofread for
grammatical errors. Late critical thought posts will NOT be
graded.
Please write a 12 to 15 sentence response to the following
multi-part question:
Find the website of a magazine you are familiar with and
interested in. Explore the website. Identify three things that the
magazine does online that it doesn’t do in print. Explain what

2. you think the differences are in terms of impact on readers. Be
specific and to the point.