「機械美学／機械芸術」に至る道程 The Route to "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" （第11回AI美芸研）
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
2 likes•445 views
第11回AI美芸研での中ザワヒデキの発表 ■第11回AI美芸研［人工知能美学芸術シンポジウム03］ 「未来のAI」 2017年11月26日（日）14:00-19:30 ※終了後、懇親会 OISTセミナールームB250 参加費無料 【講演】高橋恒一、中ザワヒデキ、ロルフ・ファイファー 【進行】銅谷賢治（OIST）、中ザワヒデキ（AI美芸研） ※講演後、全体討議の時間を設けます。 ※講演と討議は撮影、配信、実況歓迎です。記録動画を後日公開します。 https://groups.oist.jp/ja/aiaae/symposia#03 - The 11th AI Art & Aesthetics Research Meeting [Symposium 03] "Future AI" Nov 26 (Sun), 2017, 14:00-19:30 (+ After Party) OIST Seminar Room B250 / Admission free Panelists: Koichi Takahashi, Hideki Nakazawa, Rolf Pfeifer Moderators: Kenji Doya (OIST), Hideki Nakazawa (AIAARG) * Open Discussion will follow the lectures. * Recorded videos will be released. https://groups.oist.jp/aiaae/symposia#03
Recommended
More Related Content
More from 中ザワヒデキ Hideki Nakazawa
More from 中ザワヒデキ Hideki Nakazawa (18)
「機械美学／機械芸術」に至る道程 The Route to "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" （第11回AI美芸研）
- 2. The 11th AI Art & Aesthetics Research Meeting （Symposium 03） Future AI 人工知能美学芸術研究会 沖縄科学技術大学院大学 2017年11月26日（日） OIST B250
- 4. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” Hideki Nakazawa Artist, Founder and Representative of Artificial Intelligence Art and Aesthetics Research Group
- 5. Self-Introduction 1 Hideki Nakazawa • Male Japanese, born in 1963 • Artist (former ophthalmologist) • [high school] Shocked by Picasso, Stravinsky, avant-garde art • [medical college] 1 family 2 no need study to do art 3 Darwinism • [eye doctor] 1 not busy 2 deal with visual • [artist] 1 Art History 2 Patent 3 Manifesto
- 6. Self-Introduction 1 Hideki Nakazawa • Sorry for my not-so-good English • Male Japanese, born in 1963 • Artist (former ophthalmologist) • [high school] Shocked by Picasso, Stravinsky, avant-garde art • [medical college] 1 family 2 no need study to do art 3 Darwinism • [eye doctor] 1 not busy 2 deal with visual • [artist] 1 Art History 2 Patent 3 Manifesto
- 7. Self-Introduction 1 Hideki Nakazawa • Sorry for my not-so-good English • Male Japanese, born in 1963 • Artist (former ophthalmologist) • [high school] Shocked by Picasso, Stravinsky, avant-garde art • [medical college] 1 family 2 no need study to do art 3 Darwinism • [eye doctor] 1 not busy 2 deal with visual • [artist] 1 Art History 2 Patent 3 Manifesto
- 8. Self-Introduction 1 Hideki Nakazawa • Sorry for my not-so-good English • Male Japanese, born in 1963 • Artist (former ophthalmologist) • [high school] Shocked by Picasso, Stravinsky, avant-garde art • [medical college] 1 family 2 no need study to do art 3 Darwinism • [eye doctor] 1 not busy 2 deal with visual • [artist] 1 Art History 2 Patent 3 Manifesto Methodocist Manifesto 2000 New-Methodocist Manifesto 2010 Manifesto of Artificial Intelligence Art and Aesthetics 2016
- 9. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 10. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 11. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 12. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005- serious painting, New-Method, etc
- 13. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 14. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 15. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005- serious painting, New-Method, etc
- 16. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 17. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 18. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 19. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005-2009 Serious Painting • 2010-2015 New-Method • 2016- AI Art & Aesthetics
- 20. Self-Introduction 2 Artist • 1983-1989 acrylic painting • 1990-1996 Silly CG • 1997-2004 Method Painting • 2005- serious painting, New-Method, etc
- 21. Manifesto of Artificial Intelligence Art and Aesthetics
- 22. Manifesto of Artificial Intelligence Art and Aesthetics
- 24. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” Hideki Nakazawa Artist, Founder and Representative of Artificial Intelligence Art and Aesthetics Research Group
- 26. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” If human gives a goal, artificial intelligence program works well. The swing robot creates more than human beings in just over a dozen minutes and the battle between AI Go is a fight of God beyond human understanding. So if a human gives human aesthetics as an obvious goal, artificial intelligence creates art. This is "Human Aesthetics / Machine Art." However, human aesthetics are not trivial, for example, the Eiffel Tower made by machine calculation was initially criticized by artists for not being aesthetic. Such "Machine Aesthetics / Human Art" will arrive at the "art for art's sake" that aimed at art itself. Well today, artificial intelligence cannot find its own goal. But if this premise breaks down, artificial intelligence can make art aimed at machine aesthetics. If this arrives at "art for art's sake," "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" beyond human understanding will emerge.
- 31. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” If human gives a goal, artificial intelligence program works well. The swing robot creates more than human beings in just over a dozen minutes and the battle between AI Go is a fight of God beyond human understanding. So if a human gives human aesthetics as an obvious goal, artificial intelligence creates art. This is "Human Aesthetics / Machine Art." However, human aesthetics are not trivial, for example, the Eiffel Tower made by machine calculation was initially criticized by artists for not being aesthetic. Such "Machine Aesthetics / Human Art" will arrive at the "art for art's sake" that aimed at art itself. Well today, artificial intelligence cannot find its own goal. But if this premise breaks down, artificial intelligence can make art aimed at machine aesthetics. If this arrives at "art for art's sake," "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" beyond human understanding will emerge.
- 34. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” If human gives a goal, artificial intelligence program works well. The swing robot creates more than human beings in just over a dozen minutes and the battle between AI Go is a fight of God beyond human understanding. So if a human gives human aesthetics as an obvious goal, artificial intelligence creates art. This is "Human Aesthetics / Machine Art." However, human aesthetics are not trivial, for example, the Eiffel Tower made by machine calculation was initially criticized by artists for not being aesthetic. Such "Machine Aesthetics / Human Art" will arrive at the "art for art's sake" that aimed at art itself. Well today, artificial intelligence cannot find its own goal. But if this premise breaks down, artificial intelligence can make art aimed at machine aesthetics. If this arrives at "art for art's sake," "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" beyond human understanding will emerge.
- 41. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” If human gives a goal, artificial intelligence program works well. The swing robot creates more than human beings in just over a dozen minutes and the battle between AI Go is a fight of God beyond human understanding. So if a human gives human aesthetics as an obvious goal, artificial intelligence creates art. This is "Human Aesthetics / Machine Art." However, human aesthetics are not trivial, for example, the Eiffel Tower made by machine calculation was initially criticized by artists for not being aesthetic. Such "Machine Aesthetics / Human Art" will arrive at the "art for art's sake" that aimed at art itself. Well today, artificial intelligence cannot find its own goal. But if this premise breaks down, artificial intelligence can make art aimed at machine aesthetics. If this arrives at "art for art's sake," "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" beyond human understanding will emerge.
- 47. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” If human gives a goal, artificial intelligence program works well. The swing robot creates more than human beings in just over a dozen minutes and the battle between AI Go is a fight of God beyond human understanding. So if a human gives human aesthetics as an obvious goal, artificial intelligence creates art. This is "Human Aesthetics / Machine Art." However, human aesthetics are not trivial, for example, the Eiffel Tower made by machine calculation was initially criticized by artists for not being aesthetic. Such "Machine Aesthetics / Human Art" will arrive at the "art for art's sake" that aimed at art itself. Well today, artificial intelligence cannot find its own goal. But if this premise breaks down, artificial intelligence can make art aimed at machine aesthetics. If this arrives at "art for art's sake," "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" beyond human understanding will emerge.
- 54. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” If human gives a goal, artificial intelligence program works well. The swing robot creates more than human beings in just over a dozen minutes and the battle between AI Go is a fight of God beyond human understanding. So if a human gives human aesthetics as an obvious goal, artificial intelligence creates art. This is "Human Aesthetics / Machine Art." However, human aesthetics are not trivial, for example, the Eiffel Tower made by machine calculation was initially criticized by artists for not being aesthetic. Such "Machine Aesthetics / Human Art" will arrive at the "art for art's sake" that aimed at art itself. Well today, artificial intelligence cannot find its own goal. But if this premise breaks down, artificial intelligence can make art aimed at machine aesthetics. If this arrives at "art for art's sake," "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" beyond human understanding will emerge.
- 56. AIのAIによる芸術の為の芸術 • 概要： • 「AIが創作した芸術」と現在言われているものは、残念ながら、人間がAI という道具を使って制作した代物でしかない。私が見たいのは「AIのAIに よるAIの為の芸術」もさることながら、より以上に「AIのAIによる芸術の為 の芸術」である。これは私が「人生の為の芸術」を糾弾し「芸術の為の芸 術」を本懐としていることに由来する。 • 実現可能性があれば → 実用ビジネスまたは学術 • なければ → 可愛いSFおとぎ話またはうざい白痴妄想 • 芸術はどちらでもないまたはどちらでもある。
- 57. AIのAIによる芸術の為の芸術 • 概要： • 「AIが創作した芸術」と現在言われているものは、残念ながら、人間がAIという 道具を使って制作した代物でしかない。私が見たいのは「AIのAIによるAIの為 の芸術」もさることながら、より以上に「AIのAIによる芸術の為の芸術」である。 これは私が「人生の為の芸術」を糾弾し「芸術の為の芸術」を本懐としているこ とに由来する。 • 実現可能性１ • 現行の「AIは道具」は特化型であるという意味。 • では自律性と汎用性は？→必要条件だが十分条件ではない。 • 強いAIは？→必要条件だが十分条件ではない。 • 意識がある人間のようであっても、芸術しない人間もいる。
- 58. AIのAIによる芸術の為の芸術 • 概要： • 「AIが創作した芸術」と現在言われているものは、残念ながら、人間がAIという道具を使って 制作した代物でしかない。私が見たいのは「AIのAIによるAIの為の芸術」もさることながら、よ り以上に「AIのAIによる芸術の為の芸術」である。これは私が「人生の為の芸術」を糾弾し 「芸術の為の芸術」を本懐としていることに由来する。 • 実現可能性２ • フレーム問題：これはむしろ芸術の要。なにが芸術で何が芸術でないか。定義できないから人 間にとっての芸術がすでにフレーム問題。あるいはフレーム問題は価値問題でもある。何が価 値であって何が価値でないか。 • 記号接地問題：人間の芸術史をAIが理解する上では解決必要。しかし人間の芸術史を AIが理解する必要なく、それとは無関係のAIにとっての芸術が発生するのだとしたら、解決不 要。身体問題は記号接地問題に準ずる。 • コネクショニズムとシンボリズム：原子論的世界観とイデア論的世界観で多分両方必要
- 59. AIのAIによる芸術の為の芸術 • 芸術と価値について • 芸術の為の芸術…餌がなくても • 人生の為の芸術…感覚が餌、または実用（写真） ※但し感覚＝芸術と捉える立場だと芸術の為の芸術が感覚すなわち快楽至上 主義になりうる。反対に感覚は芸術でないという立場として、コンセプチュアルアート、 反芸術があり中ザワはこれを最重要の「芸術の為の芸術」と考える。 ※芸術の為の芸術（芸術至上主義）と人生の為の芸術の区別は無理で意味 が無いとも言われる。 ※近年では「社会の為の芸術」と呼べるものが多い（地域アートなど）がこれは 「人生の為の芸術」の一翼。
- 61. AIのAIによる芸術の為の芸術 • チンパンジー 抽象の「芸術の為の芸術」はできる（餌で破綻w） 具象がむしろ難しい…逆に言えば、AIは具象画より先に抽象の「芸 術の為の芸術」は実現できるかも？ cf. 象はインチキ デズモンド・モリス著／別宮貞徳監訳『人類と芸術の300万 年：アートするサル』柊風舎、2015 • 精神障碍者 「芸術の為の芸術」の権化…天才型 ←→ 秀才型：AI美術史家プロジェクト
- 63. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” If human gives a goal, artificial intelligence program works well. The swing robot creates more than human beings in just over a dozen minutes and the battle between AI Go is a fight of God beyond human understanding. So if a human gives human aesthetics as an obvious goal, artificial intelligence creates art. This is "Human Aesthetics / Machine Art." However, human aesthetics are not trivial, for example, the Eiffel Tower made by machine calculation was initially criticized by artists for not being aesthetic. Such "Machine Aesthetics / Human Art" will arrive at the "art for art's sake" that aimed at art itself. Well today, artificial intelligence cannot find its own goal. But if this premise breaks down, artificial intelligence can make art aimed at machine aesthetics. If this arrives at "art for art's sake," "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" beyond human understanding will emerge.
- 64. 唯物論的美意識発生仮説 • 自然知能における（＝人工知能における）美意識の発生機序 • ここでの美は「役立たない」もの。真善美のそれぞれは互いに独立し、それ ぞれ固有の価値を持つ。すなわち美は、それだけで価値を持つ。 • 前提理論：山川宏「強化学習の本質は価値予測」「主目標の為に副 目標が自動生成される」「方法の目的化が起こる」 … …方法＝目的が それだけで価値を持つ。 • 仮説：主目標が遺伝子の保全（ドーキンス）に見える機構が、唯物論 的にエントロピーの増大に逆らい地上に蔓延り進化の原動力となる
- 65. 唯物論的美意識発生仮説 • 主目標：遺伝子の保全（ドーキンス『利己的な遺伝子』） • →副目標：個体ならびに近親者の生存 • →副目標：個体ならびに近親者の自己複製 • ・・・・・・・・・・化学物質から生物への進化、下等生物から高等生物への進化 • →→副々目標：集団内での競争（異性獲得の為の美意識的なもの） • →→副々目標：集団全体の拡大再生産的発展（集団IDの美意識的なもの） • ・・・・・・・・・・高等生物からヒトへの進化
- 66. 唯物論的美意識発生仮説 • 仮説追加：「生成された副目標は、主目標と矛盾しない限り淘汰されない」「主目 標、副目標、副々目標、副々々目標、…の間に主副のヒエラルキーは（無意識下 では）無い」「ヒトは伝聞的知識からも目標を生成できる（歴史から学べる）」 • 「目標：国王（や神）を称えるための技術」＝「美しい技術」＝「芸術」 の発生 • 技術と芸術の分離…１王権（神権）失墜 ２写真の登場 • しかし存続…１既成権威によらずそれ自体で権威 ２実用によらずそれ自体で価値 • 芸術の自律性…芸術の為の芸術 • 芸術と娯楽の分離（揶揄対象としてのイラスト、劇伴、売文）
- 68. The Route to “Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art” If human gives a goal, artificial intelligence program works well. The swing robot creates more than human beings in just over a dozen minutes and the battle between AI Go is a fight of God beyond human understanding. So if a human gives human aesthetics as an obvious goal, artificial intelligence creates art. This is "Human Aesthetics / Machine Art." However, human aesthetics are not trivial, for example, the Eiffel Tower made by machine calculation was initially criticized by artists for not being aesthetic. Such "Machine Aesthetics / Human Art" will arrive at the "art for art's sake" that aimed at art itself. Well today, artificial intelligence cannot find its own goal. But if this premise breaks down, artificial intelligence can make art aimed at machine aesthetics. If this arrives at "art for art's sake," "Machine Aesthetics / Machine Art" beyond human understanding will emerge.