Given the natural order, and learning as the capacity to reconstruct it, it becomes possible to predict behavior from thought; then productivity and leadership would derive from self-control, which predicts learning

1. CONSULTANTS
8, De - Ba ng ler St.
P.O. Box 1243,
Gb oko
+ 234-808-080-2046
E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m
+234-703-430-2486
The Agape Constant, F:
A Mathematical Model of Humans
By
Peter Anyebe
AGAPE
CONSULTANTS
5th
September, 2015
HubPages
View
my profile
WordPress
Google Me
Google+
Website:
www.identi
tykit.biz
Given the natural order, and learning as the capacity to reconstruct it, it
becomes possible to predict behavior from thought; then productivity and
leadership would derive from self-control, which predicts learning
Keywords: Thought, Behavior, Learning, Productivity, Leadership,
Self-control, Natural order, Personal Order, Reality, Imagery

2. CONSULTANTS
8, De - Ba ng ler St.
P.O. Box 1243,
Gb oko
+ 234-808-080-2046
E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m
+234-703-430-2486
The Agape Constant, F:
A Mathematical Model of Humans
By
Peter Anyebe
0.00 Abstract
Humans are conceptualized as faith, F personalities, to the extent that the personal
order, P-O approximates the natural order, N-O; which would be sufficient
evidence of imagery, as operationalized in the unity of humanity with the universe.
To the extent of the capacity for self-control, ScR the capacities for productivity and
leadership would be determined, which point to a certain behavior pattern that is
process oriented. And to the extent that a person is learned, it would be possible to
predict the behavior pattern from the thought pattern; which actually points to
creative thought that is intellectual, and at optimum puts the emotion in check for
self-control.
To establish imagery therefore, dimensionality is reduced into relativity; which is
then measured on the F-Scale, against the absolute that would then be non-
dimensional. The factors Pc, Rn, and √n are measured on the identity kit, Id-Kit to
establish the productivity model, for RES = RGT, Nu → 4 and Ps → 20%. Eighteen,
18 of the one hundred, 100 subjects measured scaled the consistency test to qualify
for the rest of the analyses, but only two, 2 of these fulfilled the requirements of the
model. When the Id-Kit is coupled with the bill of health index, BHI which uses
input from the books of organizations including revenue, profit, and cost of
materials; the same two, 2 subjects are returned, as self-contained, ScT. The six, 6
metrics that are derived from this analysis become basis to evaluate self-control,
following which leadership is reduced to the equality in the scores on the factors f0,
ScT, ScR, and RtN; by which for the third, 3rd
time, the two, 2 subjects are returned,
to reject all four, 4 hypotheses.
View my profile Google Me WordPress

3. 1.00 Hypothesis
To put a value on people uniquely, it would be unreasonable to conceptualize
humans as one, 1 with the universe, to the extent that the personal order, P-O
is able to approximate the natural order, N-O, for f0 → 1:
To put a value on people against the backdrop of their thought process, f0 it
would be unreasonable to expect humans to be a reflection of their thoughts, to
the extent that the behavior pattern, Fb and the thought pattern, Fp are
equivalent concepts, for Fb = 1 / 10 (10Fp + 1).
To evaluate the human capacity for productivity, it would be unreasonable to
expect a positive relationship between the appropriateness of the responses to
stimuli, for RES = RGT; and the capacity to reconstruct the four, 4 strategic
objectives, for Nu → 4; as well as the location of the subject on the Pareto 80
– 20 continuum, for Ps → 20%:
To evaluate the human capacity for leadership, it would be unreasonable to
expect scores to be equal for the following four, 4 factors:
 f0
 ScR
 ScT
 RtN

4. 1.10 Research Questions
The research questions from which these hypotheses are derived are presented as
follows:
Is it feasible despite Immanuel Kant who posited the impossibility to derive
noumena or the N-O that, humans are one with the universe; to the extent of
the human potential capacity to reconstruct reality, and thereby approximate
the N-O?
Does it follow from the above that, thought and behavior are equivalent
concepts; in the sense that, the behavior pattern can be predicted from the
thought pattern?
When the responses to stimuli are appropriate therefore, would this imply that
the person is productive, to the extent that they are able to derive the four, 4
strategic objectives; and that they are leaders, being 20%ters according to the
Pareto 80-20 rule?
Is it feasible to corroborate the definition of leadership in three, 3 above, with
the unity in the subjects’ scores on the factors f0, ScT, ScR, and RtN?
2.00 Literature
For the review of the literature, it would be sufficient in this work, to reference the
following documents, in series:
3.00 Methodology
To derive the natural order, N-O the following three, 3 principles were referenced:
3. Agape Research Literature
2. Emotional Intelligence 6. EI on Pinterest
1. CIPD Centenary Site 5. Labor on the Shelf
4. Precise HR

5. Relativity,
Normality, and
Duality
Thus by Einstein’s relativity principle an event in space would be viewed from an
infinite number of positions, each of which actually represents a perspective of the
event; which points to the possibility of an infinite number of realities, for every
person. But by the normality principle in games theory, a game of infinite moves
could be reduced into one, 1 unit move, which would then be iterated until the game
ends. The duality series in operations research is adopted to define the unit
perspective that this suggests as follows:
Maxima
Minimax
Maximin
Minima
Notice that this series defines the normal curve, following which about 68% of all
occurrences fall within one, 1 and three, 3 standard deviations from the mean. For a
thought pattern that approximates the N-O therefore, the resultant behavior pattern
would be normal, to the extent that about 68% of the activities fall within one, 1 and
three, 3 standard deviations from the mean. And to evaluate normality for individual
cases, it would be sufficient to measure the ratio of the relative on the absolute,
which defines the closeness with which the former approximates the latter. Recall
that while relativity is dimensional, the absolute is non-dimensional. Then normality
would actually represent the ratio of a vector on a scalar, which retains the unit of
the vector. The following three, 3 factors are measured, for establishment:
Self-control, ScR: ScR = ScT / LnG
Business environment, EB: EB = BHIF / BHI
Organizational culture, Org-C: Org-C = BHIG / BHI
Then the concept is applied to the measure of the monetized return on investment,
ROI as ROI = Profit / ROI. This enhances a precise HR, to put the right workforce,
ScR in the right environment, EB delivering profitable business results, ROI. So that
labor can be put on the shelf, as a commodity.

6. The Sn-Score, the f0-Scores, and the F-Score are kernel and define the form of the
Id-Kit. A demo of how these measures operate is presented at the following links:
Demos: https://app.box.com/s/0vydt2sx1aorf5hier09onry4pp5b19i
 Sn-Score: https://app.box.com/s/3jexfwbg4lzn1ef6zws634gcdwdx2jkp
 f0-Score: https://app.box.com/s/8s8469rgapq160o8so2b4ketvn0yrq3x
 F-Score: https://app.box.com/s/dr5u0e5al1uaaxvu7kjoutr8m4x3im1j
4.00 Derivation
The infinite number of positions from which events are viewed define a sphere,
which rolls out into the number line, in its linear form as follows:
- ∞ 0 + ∞
A F L
When the absolute is applied to the number line and all the items are squared, it
normalizes the relativity continuum as follows:
Then the mathematical model of humans would be derived as an equation of the
form that follows:
∂2
F
A L
∂3
The Relativity Continuum

7. 1. L = ∂1
1
/A
2. L = ∂2F
3. A = ∂3F
4. ∂3 = 1
/∂2
5. ∂1 = LA: from 1
= F2
: from 2, 3, and 4
For:
L = 1
/A F2
QED: Substituting in 1
5.00 Concluding
As faith personalities, F what distinguishes between people would be knowledge, to the
extent that they are able to reconstruct reality according to the N-O. And what distinguishes
between the learned would be fasting, defined as the capacity to do without, which
determines delayed gratification. Recall that in general, information that enters the brain
reaches the emotion before the intellect. Recall also that the emotion, from which responses
to stimuli are directed, is often programmed with processes that cause below optimum
performance. This is what necessitates unlearning and relearning, to replace the faulty
programs with new ones that are more correct and lead to unconscious competency, which
is done by the intellect.
This requires that responses to stimuli from the emotion are delayed, until the intellect has
defined the more appropriate response. How well this is done would be evident in the scores
on the four, 4 strategic factors including f0, ScT, ScR, and RtN. Recall that these factors are
evaluated from measures of another six, 6 factors; three, 3 of which are from the Id-Kit; and
the other three, 3 from the organization’s books, to measure the BHI. While the Id-Kit
evaluates the thought pattern, the BHI evaluates the behavior pattern, both of which are
connected by learning. Underlying these scores would be the capacities for productivity, Nu
as well as leadership, Ps both of which are connected by self-control, ScR. Moreover, recall
the following dictum:
Thus given self-control, ScR, objectivity, f0 defined as the approximation of the
N-O, as well as self-containment, ScT would be determined. And together, these
would determine workforce retention, RtN; serially as follows:
L = Positivity
A = Negativity
F = Relativity
F2
= The Absolute
A God who is self-contained
Created a universe that is self-contained
So that when humans become self-contained
They create institutions that are self-contained
3. ScT
2. ScR
1. f0
4. RtN

8. 6.00 Data
Hypotheses 1 – 3
The first, 1st
two,
2 of the eighteen,
18 subjects
satisfy the
requirements of
the productivity
model, with data
from the identity
kit, Id-Kit:
RES = RGT,
Nu → 4
Ps → 20%
Hypotheses 3 & 4
When the
productivity model
is combined with
the bill of health
index, BHI which
is evaluated for
companies with
data from their
books; the same
two, 2 subjects are
predicted
Hypothesis 4
When the
productivity model
is combined with
the bill of health
index, BHI, as well
as the self-control
model, the same
two, 2 subjects are
predicted