SlideShare a Scribd company logo
A publication of the Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources | October 2014 | Vol. 1, Issue 1
Texas
LandTrends
Status update and
trends of Texas rural
working lands
fiber, support rural economies,
and provide wildlife habitat,
clean air and water, and
recreational opportunities.
What are working lands?
Working lands are privately owned farms,
ranches, and forests that produce food and
Texas working lands are undergoing
a fundamental change, one that has
implications for rural economies, national
security and food security, and conservation
of water and other natural resources. Native
landscapes are increasingly threatened by
suburbanization, rural development and land
fragmentation driven by rapid population growth.
Foreword
The Texas Land Trends report has informed private and public decision-makers
about the status and trends of our state’s farms, ranches, and forests, collectively
known as working lands. Since its inception under the leadership and vision of
Dr. Neal Wilkins, the Texas Land Trends report has been used in guiding conser-
vation efforts and natural resource policy development for nearly two decades.
Texas Land Trends also evolved from a paper-based report to an interactive
website and database allowing users to query data and better understand changes
in Texas’ rural landscapes. Published every five years, following the U.S. Depart-
ment of Agriculture (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service’s (NASS)
Census of Agriculture data release, the comprehensive dataset from Texas Land
Trends serves to inform key and complicated Texas natural resource issues
through the power of a “good map.”
The Texas Land Trends report is in its third publication. Previous reports have
been single and comprehensive works. A change with the 2014 Texas Land
Trends release is the development of a series of reports, rather than a single report
released every five years, to better understand the status of Texas lands from the
perspective of key issues (e.g., water, energy, etc.). This inaugural issue is focused
on the five-year trends update of Texas rural working lands. Furthermore, part
of the new 2014 Texas Land Trends report will include a completely redesigned
interactive website to be launched later this year. Stay tuned for future updates
from Texas Land Trends.
Published by
Texas A&M Institute of
Renewable Natural Resources
Contributors
Ross Anderson
Addie Engeling
Amy Grones
Roel Lopez
Brian Pierce
Kevin Skow
Todd Snelgrove
Designer
Leslie Lee
Editor
Kathy Wythe
Photo credits: crestock.com, istock.com,
Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural
Resources, Texas Water Resources Institute,
Texas A&M AgriLife
Contact:
Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources
1500 Research Parkway A110
2260 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-2260
979.845.0662 | irnr@tamu.edu
Citation: Texas Land Trends. 2014. Status update
and trends of Texas rural working lands. Texas
A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources,
College Station, Texas. Volume 1, Issue 1. 13 pages.
URL: http://txlandtrends.org.
For more information,
visit our website at
txlandtrends.org
State Comptroller of Public
Accounts (i.e., 1997-2012
annual compilation of
land use and land value
data from all independent
school districts), and the
NASS Census of Agriculture
2012 data. We also used
data from the U.S. Census
Bureau, USDA National
Resources Inventory (NRI),
and the U.S. Department
of Commerce/Bureau of
Economic Analysis–Regional
Economic Information
System.
Roel Lopez
Director
About the 2014 Texas Land Trends Report
The Texas Land Trends report is published every five years, following the avail-
ability of the USDA NASS Census of Agriculture data, and serves to describe
the status and recent changes in land use, ownership size, and land values of
privately owned Texas farms, ranches, and forests, collectively known as working
lands. The goal of the Texas Land Trends report is to provide public and private
decision-makers with timely information to support the conservation of Texas
working lands. Primary data sources used in the 2014 report include the Texas
Texas Land Trends 2014	 1
Institute of Renewable Natural Resources
Texas
LandTrends
Texas Land Trends | October 2014 | Vol. 1, Issue 1
Status update and trends of Texas
rural working lands
Population Growth
•	According to a U.S. Census Bureau study from 2013,Texas has seven of the 15 most rapidly growing cities in the nation.
•	From 1997 to 2012, theTexas population increased from 19 million to 26 million residents, an increase of 36 percent or
approximately 500,000 new residents annually.
•	The majority (87 percent) of the population increase occurred within the state’s top 25 highest growth counties.
Land Loss
•	From 1997 to 2012, there was a net loss of approximately 1.1 million acres of working lands, converted to non-agricultural
uses. From 2007 to 2012, nearly 100,000 acres of Texas working lands were converted to non-agricultural uses, a significant
decline from previous reporting periods (approximately 500,000 acres per 5-year period).
•	More than 54 percent of total land conversion occurred in the state’s 25 fastest growing counties. During this period (1997-
2012), approximately 590,000 acres were lost from the agricultural land base in these counties.
•	Texas continues to lead the nation in the loss of working lands (total acres). From 1982 to 2010, the USDA National
Resources Inventory (NRI) data reported the conversion of more than 4.1 million acres of Texas working lands to urban
uses, with significantly higher conversion rates occurring from 1992 to 2007 (USDA 2013).
Land Values
•	In 2012, the average appraised market value of Texas working land was $1,573 per acre, a 36-percent increase since 2007
and a 214-percent increase over the 15-year period. The largest increases in land values were observed surrounding major
metropolitan growth areas.
•	The significant decline in the conversion of Texas working lands from 2007 to 2012 (nearly 100,000 acres) may be attributed
to a weak economy resulting from the economic recession that occurred during a portion of this period. With Texas’ current
economic growth, acceleration in working lands loss may be anticipated in the future.
Ownership Size
•	Texas gained about 1,400 new working farms and ranches annually while the land base for Texas agriculture decreased by
approximately 1.1 million acres (1997-2012).
•	Average ownership size declined from 581 acres in 1997 to 521 acres in 2012.
•	By the end of 2012, the USDA Census of Agriculture accounted for nearly 249,000 farming and ranching operations in the
state, representing a 9 percent increase since the 1997 census.
2 Texas Land Trends 2014
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS
Former President Lyndon B. Johnson and
native Texan once said, “Saving the water
and the soil must start where the first
rain drop falls.”
In Texas, where more than 95 percent of the land is private,
that raindrop is likely to fall on a privately owned farm,
ranch, or forest, collectively known as working lands. These
working lands produce food and fiber, support rural econo-
mies, and provide wildlife habitat, clean air and water, and
recreational opportunities for many Texans. Many of these
working lands also have long and rich family history dating
back many generations.
Texas private lands provide vital wildlife resources and
much of the native flora and fauna is of national and
even international significance. Yet these lands are under
increasing land conversion pressure driven by rapid popula-
tion growth, suburbanization, and rural development, all
of which have implications for the state’s rural economies,
national security and food security, and the conservation of
natural resources.
In this report, we summarize land demographic data related
to Texas’ changing “working lands” landscape in three
primary sections: land loss, land values, and ownership
size. Findings from the 2014 report also are compared to
previous Texas Land Trends reports to determine current and
historic land use trends.
Texas Land Trends 2014 3
INTRODUCTION
4 Texas Land Trends 2014
Texas Land Trends
Figure 1. The top 25 fastest growing counties in Texas in 2012, with seven of
the fastest-growing large cities in the U.S., as listed in Table 1
Table 1. The 15 fastest growing large cities with populations of 50,000 or
more from July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2013
Rank Area Name
Percent
Increase
2013 Total
Population
1 San Marcos, Texas 8.0 54,076
2 Frisco, Texas 6.5 136,791
3 South Jordan, Utah 6.1 59,366
4 Cedar Park, Texas 5.6 61,238
5 Lehi, Utah 5.5 54,382
6 Goodyear, Arizona 4.8 72,864
7 Georgetown, Texas 4.5 54,898
8 Gaithersburg, Maryland 4.4 65,690
9 Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 4.1 74,885
10 Meridian, Idaho 4.0 83,596
11 Odessa, Texas 4.0 110,720
12 Gilbert, Arizona 4.0 229,972
13 McKinney, Texas 3.9 148,559
14 Franklin, Tennessee 3.9 68,886
15 Pearland, Texas 3.8 100,065
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Vintage 2013 Population Estimate
Overview
Texas is comprised of 142 million acres of private
farms, ranches and forests, leading the nation in land
area devoted to privately owned working lands. These
working lands account for 83 percent of the state’s entire
land area and provide substantial economic, environ-
mental, and recreational resources that benefit many
Texans. According to a U.S. Census Bureau study, seven
of the 15 fastest growing cities in the nation, from July 1,
2012 to July 1, 2013, were in Texas (U.S. Census Bureau
2014) (Table 1 and Figure 1). From 1997 to 2012, the
Texas population grew from 19 million to 26 million
residents, an increase of 36 percent or approximately
500,000 new residents annually. From the Texas Land
Trends data, the majority of the population increase (87
percent or six million new residents) occurred within the
state’s top 25 highest total population growth counties
(Figure 2). These counties account for only 10 percent
of the total land area of the state, yet 73 percent of all
Texans reside within these 25 counties (Figures 3 and 4).
The state’s increasing population, particularly within or
in surrounding urban centers, continues to have signif-
icant influence on the continued loss of working lands,
changing ownership sizes, and land values.
Texas Land Trends 2014	 5
(1997-2012)
Figure 2. Statewide change in total population by county from 1997-2012. Top 25
highest total population growth counties highlighted
Figure 3. Texas land area (acres) in the top 25 highest
population growth counties
Figure 4. Texas population in the top 25 highest population
growth counties
6 Texas Land Trends 2014
Figure 5. Total working lands in Texas from 1997-2012
Figure 7. Loss of working lands in Texas from 1997-2012 within the top 25 highest
total population growth counties
Working Land Loss
Working land loss has continued since
the last Texas Land Trends report, with
a net loss of nearly 100,000 acres over
the most recent 5-year period (2007-
2012). The rate of working land loss,
however, was significantly lower when
compared to previous reporting periods
(i.e. 1997-2002 and 2002-2007), where
the average land loss was nearly 500,000
acres per 5-year reporting period or
100,000 acres annually (Figures 5 and
6). The decreased rate of land loss in the
current reporting period (2007-2012)
may be attributed to the economic
recession that occurred during this same
period. If the economy is a major factor
in land loss, the more recent economic
growth suggests future working land loss
may increase during the next Texas Land
Trends reporting cycle (i.e., 2013-2017).
Texas continues to lead all other states
in the loss of working land acreage. The
total net loss in Texas working lands
from 1997 to 2012 was nearly 1.1
million acres. USDA NRI data supports
this land loss trend, which reports from
1982 to 2010 more than 4.1 million
acres of rural land was converted in Texas
to urban uses, with significantly higher
rates of conversion occurring from 1992
to 2007 (USDA 2013). From the Texas
Land Trends data (1997-2012), the
majority of land conversion (87 percent
or approximately 950,000 acres of 1.1
million acres converted) occurred in the
state’s top 25 highest population growth
counties (Figure 7). Fifty-four percent
of land conversion occurred in the state’s
25 fastest growing counties (Figure 8).
As in previous Texas Land Trends reports,
working land loss in the state is closely
related to population growth.
Figure 6. Net loss of working lands in Texas from 1997-2012
Figure 8. Loss of working lands in Texas from 1997-2012 within the top 25 fastest growing counties
Texas Land Trends 2014	 7
8 Texas Land Trends 2014
Figure 9. Market value ($/Acre) for 1997 (top) and 2012 (bottom) Figure 10. Change in market value ($/Acre) from 1997-2012 with the top
25 fastest growing counties
Land Values
Land market values, as reported here, are based on
recent land sales of farms, ranches and forests and have
historically served as a strong indicator in the measure of
demand for rural land. Like more traditional home real
estate values, rural land market values vary by location,
land use, property size, and other market factors. From
the Texas Land Trends data, the average appraised market
value for Texas working lands was $1,573 per acre in
2012. On average, this represents a 36-percent increase
in land value since 2007, and a 214 percent increase
over the 15-year period (Figure 9). As in previous Texas
Land Trends reports, changes in market value was closely
tied to distance from major metropolitan growth areas
(Figure 10). The average land value, for example, within
the top 25 fastest growing counties was $5,266 per acre
in 2012, compared to the statewide average of $1,573
per acre. During this same period the productivity value
of the land (i.e. the value of the land based solely on the
ability to produce commodities such as food and fiber)
has remained largely unchanged. The average statewide
productivity value in 1997 was $84 per acre, compared
Texas Land Trends 2014	 9
Figure 11. Texas ecoregions
to $93 per acre in 2012. Relatively static productivity
values and rapidly rising market values are likely under-
lying drivers of land use conversion and ownership
fragmentation.
Noteworthy regional trends in land values were observed
from the overall Texas Land Trends data period (1997-
2012, Figure 11). Land values in the Blackland Prairie
and Oak Woods and Prairie Ecoregions increased nearly
250 percent over the 15-year period (Figure 12). The
increase in value within these regions may be attributed
to the close proximity of urban areas. Similarly, the
Edwards Plateau, Llano Uplift, Gulf Coast Prairies,
Rolling Plains, and South Texas Brush Country Ecore-
gions also witnessed a two to three fold increase in
land values over the 15-year period. The increase also
may be attributed to their proximity to urban areas,
in addition to the desirable recreational value of those
lands. Finally, the Trans Pecos and High Plains had only
slight increases in land values over the 15-year period,
compared to other parts of the state (Figure 12).
Figure 12. Regional difference in market and productivity value of working lands in 1997 and 2012
Ownership Size
By the end of 2012, the USDA Census of Agriculture accounted for nearly 249,000 farm and ranch operations in the state. This
represents a 9-percent increase, or the addition of approximately 1,400 new farms and ranches added annually, since the 1997
census. In contrast, the land base for Texas agriculture decreased by 1.1 million acres during the same period. Average owner-
ship size decreased from 581 acres in 1997 to 521 acres in 2012 (Figures 13 and 14).
Statewide trends in ownership fragmentation were observed from the Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012), with a net increase
of >500,000 acres for ownerships comprised of <100 acre tracts, and nearly 26,000 individual operations—an increase of more
than 20 percent since 1997. The total number of individual small ownerships (all tracts <500 acres in size) in 2012 included
nearly 210,000 individual operations or approximately 17 percent of the acres devoted to working land. This is further
evidence of continued ownership fragmentation; however, the rate of fragmentation has decreased in recent years with only a
1.1 percent increase from 2007-2012 compared to 10.4 percent from 2002-2007. The decreased rate of ownership fragmenta-
tion in the current reporting period (2007-2012) may be attributed to the economic recession that occurred during this same
period.
Mid-sized working lands (those properties 500 to 2,000 acres in size) experienced the greatest decline in ownership acres and
total operations from the Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012). The amount of land for mid-sized farms and ranches declined
at the rate of about 220,000 acres annually. Mid-sized working lands accounted for over 27 million acres of land statewide
or approximately 21 percent of the total working land base. Over 3,400 mid-sized operations representing 3.3 million acres
shifted to smaller or larger ownership classes between 1997 and 2012 or were converted to other non-working lands uses
(Figures 15 and 16). For both small and mid-sized ownership classes, ownership fragmentation appears to be closely related to
proximity to major urban areas and/or transportation corridors (Figure 17).
Figure 15. Change in acreage of farms and ranches by size class from 1997-2012
10 Texas Land Trends 2014
Figure 13. Total farm and ranch count from 1997-2012 Figure 14. Total farm and ranch acres from 1997-2012
Figure 16. Change in number of farms and ranches by size class from 1997-2012
Figure 17. Increase in number of farms <500 acres in size from
1997-2012 indicating areas of possible land fragmentation
Figure 18. Increase in acreage of farms and ranches in the >2,000
acre size class from 1997-2012
Texas Land Trends 2014	 11
Consolidation of large ownerships (>2,000 acres) were observed from the Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012) with a net
increase of nearly 400,000 acres and approximately 200 individual operations in this category. Large ownerships comprised
more than 80 million acres of land statewide, or approximately 62 percent of the total working land base, with only 10,810
individual operations. Consolidation of large ownerships occurred in a few regions of the state and likely may be attributed to
investment opportunities pursued by prospective buyers where (1) overall average land values are lower, and (2) opportunities
for consolidation are more likely (i.e., larger ownership sizes) (Figure 18). Lower average land values and larger ownership sizes
are found in regions such as the High Plains (productive agriculture operations) and South and West Texas, where hunting
enterprises appear to be expanding. Consolidation may be driven by the ability of prospective buyers to capitalize on both land
values and land availability in the aggregation of large ownerships.
12 Texas Land Trends 2014
Figure 19. Average annual net proceeds per acre for different farm and ranch size classes
Finally, Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012) found an association between the profitability of a farm or ranch operation and
ownership size. When considered statewide, more than half of all farms and ranches larger than 500 acres reported positive net
proceeds (Figure 19). Conversely, small ownerships (i.e., <150 acres) reported increasing net losses on farm and ranch proceeds
(Figure 19). Thus, the shift in ownership category or loss of larger ownerships through fragmentation may have potential
implications for profitability and continued stability of working lands. Likewise, consolidation into larger operations may be
associated with more profitable agricultural operations.
Texas Land Trends 2014	 13
Future Outlook
Since 2000, Texas has been one of the fastest growing states, with a population growth rate that is nearly double, when
compared to the rest of the nation (12.7 percent versus 6.4 percent). The Office of the State Demographer projects the state’s
population will increase to 41.3 million by 2050—a 191-percent increase from the 1980 population of 14.2 million. Since
working land loss is directly related to population growth and associated urban development, future growth in the state will
continue to have profound impacts on Texas working lands. With the recent economic recession, a brief pause in working
lands conversion and ownership fragmentation occurred; however, with an improved state economy, a return to the trend of
rapid working land loss may be anticipated.
Acknowledgments
Support for Texas Land Trends was made possible by the generous support of the Meadows Foundation, Houston Endowment,
Mitchell Foundation, Hershey Foundation and Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service. We also acknowledge the partnership
support of the Texas Agricultural Land Trust.
Definitions
Working lands—privately owned farms, ranches, and forests that produce food and fiber, support rural economies, and
provide wildlife habitat, clean air and water, and recreational opportunities.
Fragmentation—the break-up of large farms, ranches, and forests into smaller ownership sizes.
Consolidation—the combining of smaller farms, ranches, and forests to create larger ownerships.
References
Potter, L.B., Hogue, W. 2013. Texas Population Projections, 2010 to 2050, Texas State Data Center and Office of the State
Demographer, Austin, TX. http://osd.state.tx.us/Publications/2013-01_ProjectionBrief.pdf
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2013. Summary Report: 2010 National Resources Inventory, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Washington, DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. http://www.
nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1167354.pdf
U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. South, West Have Fastest-Growing Cities, Census Bureau Reports; Three of Top 10 are in Texas
Capital Area, U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2013 Population Estimates, Washington, DC. https://www.census.
gov/newsroom/press-releases/2014/cb14-89.html
Institute of Renewable Natural Resources
Texas
LandTrends
TXLANDTRENDS.ORG IRNR.TAMU.EDU

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Wizualizacja różnic
Wizualizacja różnicWizualizacja różnic
Wizualizacja różnic
Joanna Pitura
 
Basics of Induction Technique
Basics of Induction TechniqueBasics of Induction Technique
Basics of Induction TechniqueNatalino Fonseca
 
Pop Music Video Analysis
Pop Music Video Analysis Pop Music Video Analysis
Pop Music Video Analysis
keeley05
 
Методичка по кейс методу
Методичка по кейс методуМетодичка по кейс методу
Методичка по кейс методу
Александр Власов
 
Ira Vicky Harvey
Ira Vicky HarveyIra Vicky Harvey
Ira Vicky HarveyIra Harvey
 
Vignesh.resume
Vignesh.resumeVignesh.resume
Vignesh.resume
vigneshkumar Menon
 
Nathi bio (1) (1)
Nathi bio (1) (1)Nathi bio (1) (1)
Nathi bio (1) (1)
Lance Stehr
 
Brand book MPPM
Brand book MPPMBrand book MPPM
Analisa buku andy’s corner
Analisa buku andy’s cornerAnalisa buku andy’s corner
Analisa buku andy’s corner
isma anggini
 
West Elgin Secondary School Promotion and Retention Report
West Elgin Secondary School Promotion and Retention ReportWest Elgin Secondary School Promotion and Retention Report
West Elgin Secondary School Promotion and Retention ReportBrendan Carey
 
Learn sql queries
Learn sql queriesLearn sql queries
Learn sql queries
Sanjay Mago
 
Итоги Metall Cup в ИрНИТУ
Итоги Metall Cup в ИрНИТУИтоги Metall Cup в ИрНИТУ
Итоги Metall Cup в ИрНИТУ
Александр Власов
 
How does my media product represent particular social presentation
How does my media product represent particular social presentationHow does my media product represent particular social presentation
How does my media product represent particular social presentation
jlishman
 
Horario sep2015 feb2016-horarios_tercera__parcial
Horario sep2015 feb2016-horarios_tercera__parcialHorario sep2015 feb2016-horarios_tercera__parcial
Horario sep2015 feb2016-horarios_tercera__parcial
Instituto Tecnológico Superior Ibarra (ITSI)
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Wizualizacja różnic
Wizualizacja różnicWizualizacja różnic
Wizualizacja różnic
 
Basics of Induction Technique
Basics of Induction TechniqueBasics of Induction Technique
Basics of Induction Technique
 
Pop Music Video Analysis
Pop Music Video Analysis Pop Music Video Analysis
Pop Music Video Analysis
 
Методичка по кейс методу
Методичка по кейс методуМетодичка по кейс методу
Методичка по кейс методу
 
Ira Vicky Harvey
Ira Vicky HarveyIra Vicky Harvey
Ira Vicky Harvey
 
Vignesh.resume
Vignesh.resumeVignesh.resume
Vignesh.resume
 
Resume
ResumeResume
Resume
 
Nathi bio (1) (1)
Nathi bio (1) (1)Nathi bio (1) (1)
Nathi bio (1) (1)
 
otomotive
otomotiveotomotive
otomotive
 
PANKAJ BISHT CV
PANKAJ BISHT CVPANKAJ BISHT CV
PANKAJ BISHT CV
 
manufacture
manufacturemanufacture
manufacture
 
Aprenzentasaun
AprenzentasaunAprenzentasaun
Aprenzentasaun
 
Brand book MPPM
Brand book MPPMBrand book MPPM
Brand book MPPM
 
Brochure_2015_Dec_18
Brochure_2015_Dec_18Brochure_2015_Dec_18
Brochure_2015_Dec_18
 
Analisa buku andy’s corner
Analisa buku andy’s cornerAnalisa buku andy’s corner
Analisa buku andy’s corner
 
West Elgin Secondary School Promotion and Retention Report
West Elgin Secondary School Promotion and Retention ReportWest Elgin Secondary School Promotion and Retention Report
West Elgin Secondary School Promotion and Retention Report
 
Learn sql queries
Learn sql queriesLearn sql queries
Learn sql queries
 
Итоги Metall Cup в ИрНИТУ
Итоги Metall Cup в ИрНИТУИтоги Metall Cup в ИрНИТУ
Итоги Metall Cup в ИрНИТУ
 
How does my media product represent particular social presentation
How does my media product represent particular social presentationHow does my media product represent particular social presentation
How does my media product represent particular social presentation
 
Horario sep2015 feb2016-horarios_tercera__parcial
Horario sep2015 feb2016-horarios_tercera__parcialHorario sep2015 feb2016-horarios_tercera__parcial
Horario sep2015 feb2016-horarios_tercera__parcial
 

Similar to Texas Land Trends Report 2014

EMERGING ISSUES-The Changing Demographic and the Natural Environment in Texas...
EMERGING ISSUES-The Changing Demographic and the Natural Environment in Texas...EMERGING ISSUES-The Changing Demographic and the Natural Environment in Texas...
EMERGING ISSUES-The Changing Demographic and the Natural Environment in Texas...
tsuempa
 
Martinsburg Urban Tree Inventory
Martinsburg Urban Tree InventoryMartinsburg Urban Tree Inventory
Martinsburg Urban Tree Inventory
WV Assocation of Geospatial Professionals
 
2014 nfs annual_report
2014 nfs annual_report2014 nfs annual_report
2014 nfs annual_report
Susan Hartmann
 
2014 NFS Annual Report
2014 NFS Annual Report2014 NFS Annual Report
2014 NFS Annual ReportSusan Hartmann
 
2014 nfs annual report
2014 nfs annual report2014 nfs annual report
2014 nfs annual report
Susan Hartmann
 
2014 SONR - Potomac Conservancy
2014 SONR - Potomac Conservancy2014 SONR - Potomac Conservancy
2014 SONR - Potomac ConservancyMelissa Diemand
 
Kraft stewards for life
Kraft   stewards for lifeKraft   stewards for life
Kraft stewards for lifedghagenmaier
 
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908DC Kuhns
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
ShielaSorino1
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
NehaChaudhary250260
 
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climateSNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
American Planning Association - Massachusetts Chapter
 
Paving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of Drought
Paving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of DroughtPaving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of Drought
Paving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of Drought
Fulvia52x
 
Assessing dynamic soil properties and inventorying an ecological site
Assessing dynamic soil properties and inventorying an ecological siteAssessing dynamic soil properties and inventorying an ecological site
Assessing dynamic soil properties and inventorying an ecological site
Soil and Water Conservation Society
 
Texas Water Resources Institute 2017 Annual Report
Texas Water Resources Institute 2017 Annual ReportTexas Water Resources Institute 2017 Annual Report
Texas Water Resources Institute 2017 Annual Report
Kathy (Kathryn) Wythe
 
Green infrastructure: Reconnecting Agriculture and Communities
Green infrastructure: Reconnecting Agriculture and CommunitiesGreen infrastructure: Reconnecting Agriculture and Communities
Green infrastructure: Reconnecting Agriculture and Communities
School Vegetable Gardening - Victory Gardens
 
NR Conservation Policy_Incorporating Tribal Perspectives
NR Conservation Policy_Incorporating Tribal PerspectivesNR Conservation Policy_Incorporating Tribal Perspectives
NR Conservation Policy_Incorporating Tribal PerspectivesRose Whitehair
 
The Importance Of Natural Resources
The Importance Of Natural ResourcesThe Importance Of Natural Resources
The Importance Of Natural Resources
Mindi Schneider
 
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as PartneTABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
lisandrai1k
 

Similar to Texas Land Trends Report 2014 (20)

EMERGING ISSUES-The Changing Demographic and the Natural Environment in Texas...
EMERGING ISSUES-The Changing Demographic and the Natural Environment in Texas...EMERGING ISSUES-The Changing Demographic and the Natural Environment in Texas...
EMERGING ISSUES-The Changing Demographic and the Natural Environment in Texas...
 
Martinsburg Urban Tree Inventory
Martinsburg Urban Tree InventoryMartinsburg Urban Tree Inventory
Martinsburg Urban Tree Inventory
 
2014 nfs annual_report
2014 nfs annual_report2014 nfs annual_report
2014 nfs annual_report
 
2014 NFS Annual Report
2014 NFS Annual Report2014 NFS Annual Report
2014 NFS Annual Report
 
2014 nfs annual report
2014 nfs annual report2014 nfs annual report
2014 nfs annual report
 
2014 SONR - Potomac Conservancy
2014 SONR - Potomac Conservancy2014 SONR - Potomac Conservancy
2014 SONR - Potomac Conservancy
 
Kraft stewards for life
Kraft   stewards for lifeKraft   stewards for life
Kraft stewards for life
 
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
 
hydrology-03-00002
hydrology-03-00002hydrology-03-00002
hydrology-03-00002
 
Kramer land use
Kramer land useKramer land use
Kramer land use
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
 
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climateSNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
SNEAPA 2013 Thursday b1 10_30_tomorrows climate
 
Paving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of Drought
Paving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of DroughtPaving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of Drought
Paving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of Drought
 
Assessing dynamic soil properties and inventorying an ecological site
Assessing dynamic soil properties and inventorying an ecological siteAssessing dynamic soil properties and inventorying an ecological site
Assessing dynamic soil properties and inventorying an ecological site
 
Texas Water Resources Institute 2017 Annual Report
Texas Water Resources Institute 2017 Annual ReportTexas Water Resources Institute 2017 Annual Report
Texas Water Resources Institute 2017 Annual Report
 
Green infrastructure: Reconnecting Agriculture and Communities
Green infrastructure: Reconnecting Agriculture and CommunitiesGreen infrastructure: Reconnecting Agriculture and Communities
Green infrastructure: Reconnecting Agriculture and Communities
 
NR Conservation Policy_Incorporating Tribal Perspectives
NR Conservation Policy_Incorporating Tribal PerspectivesNR Conservation Policy_Incorporating Tribal Perspectives
NR Conservation Policy_Incorporating Tribal Perspectives
 
The Importance Of Natural Resources
The Importance Of Natural ResourcesThe Importance Of Natural Resources
The Importance Of Natural Resources
 
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as PartneTABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
TABLE 11-1Community Assessment using the Community-as Partne
 

Recently uploaded

Green Homes, Islamabad Presentation .pdf
Green Homes, Islamabad Presentation .pdfGreen Homes, Islamabad Presentation .pdf
Green Homes, Islamabad Presentation .pdf
ticktoktips
 
BricknBolt Understanding Load-Bearing Walls and Their Structural Support in H...
BricknBolt Understanding Load-Bearing Walls and Their Structural Support in H...BricknBolt Understanding Load-Bearing Walls and Their Structural Support in H...
BricknBolt Understanding Load-Bearing Walls and Their Structural Support in H...
BrickAndBolt
 
SVN Live 6.3.24 Weekly Property Broadcast
SVN Live 6.3.24 Weekly Property BroadcastSVN Live 6.3.24 Weekly Property Broadcast
SVN Live 6.3.24 Weekly Property Broadcast
SVN International Corp.
 
Killer Referans Bahcesehir Catalog Listing Turkey
Killer Referans Bahcesehir Catalog Listing TurkeyKiller Referans Bahcesehir Catalog Listing Turkey
Killer Referans Bahcesehir Catalog Listing Turkey
Listing Turkey
 
Optimizing Your MCA Lead Capture Process for Better Results
Optimizing Your MCA Lead Capture Process for Better ResultsOptimizing Your MCA Lead Capture Process for Better Results
Optimizing Your MCA Lead Capture Process for Better Results
Lead Generation Media
 
How to keep your Home naturally Cool and Warm
How to keep your Home naturally Cool and WarmHow to keep your Home naturally Cool and Warm
How to keep your Home naturally Cool and Warm
Vinra Construction
 
Elegant Evergreen Homes - Luxury Apartments Redefining Comfort in Yelahanka, ...
Elegant Evergreen Homes - Luxury Apartments Redefining Comfort in Yelahanka, ...Elegant Evergreen Homes - Luxury Apartments Redefining Comfort in Yelahanka, ...
Elegant Evergreen Homes - Luxury Apartments Redefining Comfort in Yelahanka, ...
JagadishKR1
 
Simpolo Company Profile & Corporate Logo
Simpolo Company Profile & Corporate LogoSimpolo Company Profile & Corporate Logo
Simpolo Company Profile & Corporate Logo
simpolosparkteam
 
Brigade Insignia at Yelahanka Brochure.pdf
Brigade Insignia at Yelahanka Brochure.pdfBrigade Insignia at Yelahanka Brochure.pdf
Brigade Insignia at Yelahanka Brochure.pdf
SachinChauhan191
 
Biography and career about Lixin Azarmehr
Biography and career about Lixin AzarmehrBiography and career about Lixin Azarmehr
Biography and career about Lixin Azarmehr
Lixin Azarmehr
 
Urbanrise Paradise on Earth - Unveiling Unprecedented Luxury in Exquisite Vil...
Urbanrise Paradise on Earth - Unveiling Unprecedented Luxury in Exquisite Vil...Urbanrise Paradise on Earth - Unveiling Unprecedented Luxury in Exquisite Vil...
Urbanrise Paradise on Earth - Unveiling Unprecedented Luxury in Exquisite Vil...
JagadishKR1
 
Omaxe Sports City Dwarka A Comprehensive Guide
Omaxe Sports City Dwarka A Comprehensive GuideOmaxe Sports City Dwarka A Comprehensive Guide
Omaxe Sports City Dwarka A Comprehensive Guide
omaxesportscitydwark
 
Torun Center Residences Istanbul - Listing Turkey
Torun Center Residences Istanbul - Listing TurkeyTorun Center Residences Istanbul - Listing Turkey
Torun Center Residences Istanbul - Listing Turkey
Listing Turkey
 
Presentation to Windust Meadows HOA Board of Directors June 4, 2024: Focus o...
Presentation to Windust Meadows HOA Board of Directors June 4, 2024:  Focus o...Presentation to Windust Meadows HOA Board of Directors June 4, 2024:  Focus o...
Presentation to Windust Meadows HOA Board of Directors June 4, 2024: Focus o...
Joseph Lewis Aguirre
 
One20 North Vancouver Floor Plans by Three Shores Development.
One20 North Vancouver Floor Plans by Three Shores Development.One20 North Vancouver Floor Plans by Three Shores Development.
One20 North Vancouver Floor Plans by Three Shores Development.
VickyAulakh1
 
2BHK-3BHK NEW FLAT FOR SALE IN TUPUDANA,RANCHI.
2BHK-3BHK NEW FLAT FOR SALE IN TUPUDANA,RANCHI.2BHK-3BHK NEW FLAT FOR SALE IN TUPUDANA,RANCHI.
2BHK-3BHK NEW FLAT FOR SALE IN TUPUDANA,RANCHI.
aashiyanastardevelop
 
One FNG by Group 108 Sector 142 Noida Construction Update
One FNG by Group 108 Sector 142 Noida Construction UpdateOne FNG by Group 108 Sector 142 Noida Construction Update
One FNG by Group 108 Sector 142 Noida Construction Update
One FNG
 
MC Heights-Best Construction Company in jhang
MC Heights-Best Construction Company in jhangMC Heights-Best Construction Company in jhang
MC Heights-Best Construction Company in jhang
laraibfatim009
 
Avrupa Konutlari Yenimahalle - Listing Turkey
Avrupa Konutlari Yenimahalle - Listing TurkeyAvrupa Konutlari Yenimahalle - Listing Turkey
Avrupa Konutlari Yenimahalle - Listing Turkey
Listing Turkey
 
Investing In The US As A Canadian… And How To Do It RIGHT!! (feat. Erwin Szet...
Investing In The US As A Canadian… And How To Do It RIGHT!! (feat. Erwin Szet...Investing In The US As A Canadian… And How To Do It RIGHT!! (feat. Erwin Szet...
Investing In The US As A Canadian… And How To Do It RIGHT!! (feat. Erwin Szet...
Volition Properties
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Green Homes, Islamabad Presentation .pdf
Green Homes, Islamabad Presentation .pdfGreen Homes, Islamabad Presentation .pdf
Green Homes, Islamabad Presentation .pdf
 
BricknBolt Understanding Load-Bearing Walls and Their Structural Support in H...
BricknBolt Understanding Load-Bearing Walls and Their Structural Support in H...BricknBolt Understanding Load-Bearing Walls and Their Structural Support in H...
BricknBolt Understanding Load-Bearing Walls and Their Structural Support in H...
 
SVN Live 6.3.24 Weekly Property Broadcast
SVN Live 6.3.24 Weekly Property BroadcastSVN Live 6.3.24 Weekly Property Broadcast
SVN Live 6.3.24 Weekly Property Broadcast
 
Killer Referans Bahcesehir Catalog Listing Turkey
Killer Referans Bahcesehir Catalog Listing TurkeyKiller Referans Bahcesehir Catalog Listing Turkey
Killer Referans Bahcesehir Catalog Listing Turkey
 
Optimizing Your MCA Lead Capture Process for Better Results
Optimizing Your MCA Lead Capture Process for Better ResultsOptimizing Your MCA Lead Capture Process for Better Results
Optimizing Your MCA Lead Capture Process for Better Results
 
How to keep your Home naturally Cool and Warm
How to keep your Home naturally Cool and WarmHow to keep your Home naturally Cool and Warm
How to keep your Home naturally Cool and Warm
 
Elegant Evergreen Homes - Luxury Apartments Redefining Comfort in Yelahanka, ...
Elegant Evergreen Homes - Luxury Apartments Redefining Comfort in Yelahanka, ...Elegant Evergreen Homes - Luxury Apartments Redefining Comfort in Yelahanka, ...
Elegant Evergreen Homes - Luxury Apartments Redefining Comfort in Yelahanka, ...
 
Simpolo Company Profile & Corporate Logo
Simpolo Company Profile & Corporate LogoSimpolo Company Profile & Corporate Logo
Simpolo Company Profile & Corporate Logo
 
Brigade Insignia at Yelahanka Brochure.pdf
Brigade Insignia at Yelahanka Brochure.pdfBrigade Insignia at Yelahanka Brochure.pdf
Brigade Insignia at Yelahanka Brochure.pdf
 
Biography and career about Lixin Azarmehr
Biography and career about Lixin AzarmehrBiography and career about Lixin Azarmehr
Biography and career about Lixin Azarmehr
 
Urbanrise Paradise on Earth - Unveiling Unprecedented Luxury in Exquisite Vil...
Urbanrise Paradise on Earth - Unveiling Unprecedented Luxury in Exquisite Vil...Urbanrise Paradise on Earth - Unveiling Unprecedented Luxury in Exquisite Vil...
Urbanrise Paradise on Earth - Unveiling Unprecedented Luxury in Exquisite Vil...
 
Omaxe Sports City Dwarka A Comprehensive Guide
Omaxe Sports City Dwarka A Comprehensive GuideOmaxe Sports City Dwarka A Comprehensive Guide
Omaxe Sports City Dwarka A Comprehensive Guide
 
Torun Center Residences Istanbul - Listing Turkey
Torun Center Residences Istanbul - Listing TurkeyTorun Center Residences Istanbul - Listing Turkey
Torun Center Residences Istanbul - Listing Turkey
 
Presentation to Windust Meadows HOA Board of Directors June 4, 2024: Focus o...
Presentation to Windust Meadows HOA Board of Directors June 4, 2024:  Focus o...Presentation to Windust Meadows HOA Board of Directors June 4, 2024:  Focus o...
Presentation to Windust Meadows HOA Board of Directors June 4, 2024: Focus o...
 
One20 North Vancouver Floor Plans by Three Shores Development.
One20 North Vancouver Floor Plans by Three Shores Development.One20 North Vancouver Floor Plans by Three Shores Development.
One20 North Vancouver Floor Plans by Three Shores Development.
 
2BHK-3BHK NEW FLAT FOR SALE IN TUPUDANA,RANCHI.
2BHK-3BHK NEW FLAT FOR SALE IN TUPUDANA,RANCHI.2BHK-3BHK NEW FLAT FOR SALE IN TUPUDANA,RANCHI.
2BHK-3BHK NEW FLAT FOR SALE IN TUPUDANA,RANCHI.
 
One FNG by Group 108 Sector 142 Noida Construction Update
One FNG by Group 108 Sector 142 Noida Construction UpdateOne FNG by Group 108 Sector 142 Noida Construction Update
One FNG by Group 108 Sector 142 Noida Construction Update
 
MC Heights-Best Construction Company in jhang
MC Heights-Best Construction Company in jhangMC Heights-Best Construction Company in jhang
MC Heights-Best Construction Company in jhang
 
Avrupa Konutlari Yenimahalle - Listing Turkey
Avrupa Konutlari Yenimahalle - Listing TurkeyAvrupa Konutlari Yenimahalle - Listing Turkey
Avrupa Konutlari Yenimahalle - Listing Turkey
 
Investing In The US As A Canadian… And How To Do It RIGHT!! (feat. Erwin Szet...
Investing In The US As A Canadian… And How To Do It RIGHT!! (feat. Erwin Szet...Investing In The US As A Canadian… And How To Do It RIGHT!! (feat. Erwin Szet...
Investing In The US As A Canadian… And How To Do It RIGHT!! (feat. Erwin Szet...
 

Texas Land Trends Report 2014

  • 1. A publication of the Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources | October 2014 | Vol. 1, Issue 1 Texas LandTrends Status update and trends of Texas rural working lands
  • 2. fiber, support rural economies, and provide wildlife habitat, clean air and water, and recreational opportunities. What are working lands? Working lands are privately owned farms, ranches, and forests that produce food and Texas working lands are undergoing a fundamental change, one that has implications for rural economies, national security and food security, and conservation of water and other natural resources. Native landscapes are increasingly threatened by suburbanization, rural development and land fragmentation driven by rapid population growth.
  • 3. Foreword The Texas Land Trends report has informed private and public decision-makers about the status and trends of our state’s farms, ranches, and forests, collectively known as working lands. Since its inception under the leadership and vision of Dr. Neal Wilkins, the Texas Land Trends report has been used in guiding conser- vation efforts and natural resource policy development for nearly two decades. Texas Land Trends also evolved from a paper-based report to an interactive website and database allowing users to query data and better understand changes in Texas’ rural landscapes. Published every five years, following the U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service’s (NASS) Census of Agriculture data release, the comprehensive dataset from Texas Land Trends serves to inform key and complicated Texas natural resource issues through the power of a “good map.” The Texas Land Trends report is in its third publication. Previous reports have been single and comprehensive works. A change with the 2014 Texas Land Trends release is the development of a series of reports, rather than a single report released every five years, to better understand the status of Texas lands from the perspective of key issues (e.g., water, energy, etc.). This inaugural issue is focused on the five-year trends update of Texas rural working lands. Furthermore, part of the new 2014 Texas Land Trends report will include a completely redesigned interactive website to be launched later this year. Stay tuned for future updates from Texas Land Trends. Published by Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources Contributors Ross Anderson Addie Engeling Amy Grones Roel Lopez Brian Pierce Kevin Skow Todd Snelgrove Designer Leslie Lee Editor Kathy Wythe Photo credits: crestock.com, istock.com, Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A&M AgriLife Contact: Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources 1500 Research Parkway A110 2260 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-2260 979.845.0662 | irnr@tamu.edu Citation: Texas Land Trends. 2014. Status update and trends of Texas rural working lands. Texas A&M Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, College Station, Texas. Volume 1, Issue 1. 13 pages. URL: http://txlandtrends.org. For more information, visit our website at txlandtrends.org State Comptroller of Public Accounts (i.e., 1997-2012 annual compilation of land use and land value data from all independent school districts), and the NASS Census of Agriculture 2012 data. We also used data from the U.S. Census Bureau, USDA National Resources Inventory (NRI), and the U.S. Department of Commerce/Bureau of Economic Analysis–Regional Economic Information System. Roel Lopez Director About the 2014 Texas Land Trends Report The Texas Land Trends report is published every five years, following the avail- ability of the USDA NASS Census of Agriculture data, and serves to describe the status and recent changes in land use, ownership size, and land values of privately owned Texas farms, ranches, and forests, collectively known as working lands. The goal of the Texas Land Trends report is to provide public and private decision-makers with timely information to support the conservation of Texas working lands. Primary data sources used in the 2014 report include the Texas Texas Land Trends 2014 1 Institute of Renewable Natural Resources Texas LandTrends Texas Land Trends | October 2014 | Vol. 1, Issue 1 Status update and trends of Texas rural working lands
  • 4. Population Growth • According to a U.S. Census Bureau study from 2013,Texas has seven of the 15 most rapidly growing cities in the nation. • From 1997 to 2012, theTexas population increased from 19 million to 26 million residents, an increase of 36 percent or approximately 500,000 new residents annually. • The majority (87 percent) of the population increase occurred within the state’s top 25 highest growth counties. Land Loss • From 1997 to 2012, there was a net loss of approximately 1.1 million acres of working lands, converted to non-agricultural uses. From 2007 to 2012, nearly 100,000 acres of Texas working lands were converted to non-agricultural uses, a significant decline from previous reporting periods (approximately 500,000 acres per 5-year period). • More than 54 percent of total land conversion occurred in the state’s 25 fastest growing counties. During this period (1997- 2012), approximately 590,000 acres were lost from the agricultural land base in these counties. • Texas continues to lead the nation in the loss of working lands (total acres). From 1982 to 2010, the USDA National Resources Inventory (NRI) data reported the conversion of more than 4.1 million acres of Texas working lands to urban uses, with significantly higher conversion rates occurring from 1992 to 2007 (USDA 2013). Land Values • In 2012, the average appraised market value of Texas working land was $1,573 per acre, a 36-percent increase since 2007 and a 214-percent increase over the 15-year period. The largest increases in land values were observed surrounding major metropolitan growth areas. • The significant decline in the conversion of Texas working lands from 2007 to 2012 (nearly 100,000 acres) may be attributed to a weak economy resulting from the economic recession that occurred during a portion of this period. With Texas’ current economic growth, acceleration in working lands loss may be anticipated in the future. Ownership Size • Texas gained about 1,400 new working farms and ranches annually while the land base for Texas agriculture decreased by approximately 1.1 million acres (1997-2012). • Average ownership size declined from 581 acres in 1997 to 521 acres in 2012. • By the end of 2012, the USDA Census of Agriculture accounted for nearly 249,000 farming and ranching operations in the state, representing a 9 percent increase since the 1997 census. 2 Texas Land Trends 2014 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS
  • 5. Former President Lyndon B. Johnson and native Texan once said, “Saving the water and the soil must start where the first rain drop falls.” In Texas, where more than 95 percent of the land is private, that raindrop is likely to fall on a privately owned farm, ranch, or forest, collectively known as working lands. These working lands produce food and fiber, support rural econo- mies, and provide wildlife habitat, clean air and water, and recreational opportunities for many Texans. Many of these working lands also have long and rich family history dating back many generations. Texas private lands provide vital wildlife resources and much of the native flora and fauna is of national and even international significance. Yet these lands are under increasing land conversion pressure driven by rapid popula- tion growth, suburbanization, and rural development, all of which have implications for the state’s rural economies, national security and food security, and the conservation of natural resources. In this report, we summarize land demographic data related to Texas’ changing “working lands” landscape in three primary sections: land loss, land values, and ownership size. Findings from the 2014 report also are compared to previous Texas Land Trends reports to determine current and historic land use trends. Texas Land Trends 2014 3 INTRODUCTION
  • 6. 4 Texas Land Trends 2014 Texas Land Trends Figure 1. The top 25 fastest growing counties in Texas in 2012, with seven of the fastest-growing large cities in the U.S., as listed in Table 1 Table 1. The 15 fastest growing large cities with populations of 50,000 or more from July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2013 Rank Area Name Percent Increase 2013 Total Population 1 San Marcos, Texas 8.0 54,076 2 Frisco, Texas 6.5 136,791 3 South Jordan, Utah 6.1 59,366 4 Cedar Park, Texas 5.6 61,238 5 Lehi, Utah 5.5 54,382 6 Goodyear, Arizona 4.8 72,864 7 Georgetown, Texas 4.5 54,898 8 Gaithersburg, Maryland 4.4 65,690 9 Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 4.1 74,885 10 Meridian, Idaho 4.0 83,596 11 Odessa, Texas 4.0 110,720 12 Gilbert, Arizona 4.0 229,972 13 McKinney, Texas 3.9 148,559 14 Franklin, Tennessee 3.9 68,886 15 Pearland, Texas 3.8 100,065 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Vintage 2013 Population Estimate Overview Texas is comprised of 142 million acres of private farms, ranches and forests, leading the nation in land area devoted to privately owned working lands. These working lands account for 83 percent of the state’s entire land area and provide substantial economic, environ- mental, and recreational resources that benefit many Texans. According to a U.S. Census Bureau study, seven of the 15 fastest growing cities in the nation, from July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2013, were in Texas (U.S. Census Bureau 2014) (Table 1 and Figure 1). From 1997 to 2012, the Texas population grew from 19 million to 26 million residents, an increase of 36 percent or approximately 500,000 new residents annually. From the Texas Land Trends data, the majority of the population increase (87 percent or six million new residents) occurred within the state’s top 25 highest total population growth counties (Figure 2). These counties account for only 10 percent of the total land area of the state, yet 73 percent of all Texans reside within these 25 counties (Figures 3 and 4). The state’s increasing population, particularly within or in surrounding urban centers, continues to have signif- icant influence on the continued loss of working lands, changing ownership sizes, and land values.
  • 7. Texas Land Trends 2014 5 (1997-2012) Figure 2. Statewide change in total population by county from 1997-2012. Top 25 highest total population growth counties highlighted Figure 3. Texas land area (acres) in the top 25 highest population growth counties Figure 4. Texas population in the top 25 highest population growth counties
  • 8. 6 Texas Land Trends 2014 Figure 5. Total working lands in Texas from 1997-2012 Figure 7. Loss of working lands in Texas from 1997-2012 within the top 25 highest total population growth counties Working Land Loss Working land loss has continued since the last Texas Land Trends report, with a net loss of nearly 100,000 acres over the most recent 5-year period (2007- 2012). The rate of working land loss, however, was significantly lower when compared to previous reporting periods (i.e. 1997-2002 and 2002-2007), where the average land loss was nearly 500,000 acres per 5-year reporting period or 100,000 acres annually (Figures 5 and 6). The decreased rate of land loss in the current reporting period (2007-2012) may be attributed to the economic recession that occurred during this same period. If the economy is a major factor in land loss, the more recent economic growth suggests future working land loss may increase during the next Texas Land Trends reporting cycle (i.e., 2013-2017). Texas continues to lead all other states in the loss of working land acreage. The total net loss in Texas working lands from 1997 to 2012 was nearly 1.1 million acres. USDA NRI data supports this land loss trend, which reports from 1982 to 2010 more than 4.1 million acres of rural land was converted in Texas to urban uses, with significantly higher rates of conversion occurring from 1992 to 2007 (USDA 2013). From the Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012), the majority of land conversion (87 percent or approximately 950,000 acres of 1.1 million acres converted) occurred in the state’s top 25 highest population growth counties (Figure 7). Fifty-four percent of land conversion occurred in the state’s 25 fastest growing counties (Figure 8). As in previous Texas Land Trends reports, working land loss in the state is closely related to population growth. Figure 6. Net loss of working lands in Texas from 1997-2012
  • 9. Figure 8. Loss of working lands in Texas from 1997-2012 within the top 25 fastest growing counties Texas Land Trends 2014 7
  • 10. 8 Texas Land Trends 2014 Figure 9. Market value ($/Acre) for 1997 (top) and 2012 (bottom) Figure 10. Change in market value ($/Acre) from 1997-2012 with the top 25 fastest growing counties Land Values Land market values, as reported here, are based on recent land sales of farms, ranches and forests and have historically served as a strong indicator in the measure of demand for rural land. Like more traditional home real estate values, rural land market values vary by location, land use, property size, and other market factors. From the Texas Land Trends data, the average appraised market value for Texas working lands was $1,573 per acre in 2012. On average, this represents a 36-percent increase in land value since 2007, and a 214 percent increase over the 15-year period (Figure 9). As in previous Texas Land Trends reports, changes in market value was closely tied to distance from major metropolitan growth areas (Figure 10). The average land value, for example, within the top 25 fastest growing counties was $5,266 per acre in 2012, compared to the statewide average of $1,573 per acre. During this same period the productivity value of the land (i.e. the value of the land based solely on the ability to produce commodities such as food and fiber) has remained largely unchanged. The average statewide productivity value in 1997 was $84 per acre, compared
  • 11. Texas Land Trends 2014 9 Figure 11. Texas ecoregions to $93 per acre in 2012. Relatively static productivity values and rapidly rising market values are likely under- lying drivers of land use conversion and ownership fragmentation. Noteworthy regional trends in land values were observed from the overall Texas Land Trends data period (1997- 2012, Figure 11). Land values in the Blackland Prairie and Oak Woods and Prairie Ecoregions increased nearly 250 percent over the 15-year period (Figure 12). The increase in value within these regions may be attributed to the close proximity of urban areas. Similarly, the Edwards Plateau, Llano Uplift, Gulf Coast Prairies, Rolling Plains, and South Texas Brush Country Ecore- gions also witnessed a two to three fold increase in land values over the 15-year period. The increase also may be attributed to their proximity to urban areas, in addition to the desirable recreational value of those lands. Finally, the Trans Pecos and High Plains had only slight increases in land values over the 15-year period, compared to other parts of the state (Figure 12). Figure 12. Regional difference in market and productivity value of working lands in 1997 and 2012 Ownership Size By the end of 2012, the USDA Census of Agriculture accounted for nearly 249,000 farm and ranch operations in the state. This represents a 9-percent increase, or the addition of approximately 1,400 new farms and ranches added annually, since the 1997 census. In contrast, the land base for Texas agriculture decreased by 1.1 million acres during the same period. Average owner- ship size decreased from 581 acres in 1997 to 521 acres in 2012 (Figures 13 and 14).
  • 12. Statewide trends in ownership fragmentation were observed from the Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012), with a net increase of >500,000 acres for ownerships comprised of <100 acre tracts, and nearly 26,000 individual operations—an increase of more than 20 percent since 1997. The total number of individual small ownerships (all tracts <500 acres in size) in 2012 included nearly 210,000 individual operations or approximately 17 percent of the acres devoted to working land. This is further evidence of continued ownership fragmentation; however, the rate of fragmentation has decreased in recent years with only a 1.1 percent increase from 2007-2012 compared to 10.4 percent from 2002-2007. The decreased rate of ownership fragmenta- tion in the current reporting period (2007-2012) may be attributed to the economic recession that occurred during this same period. Mid-sized working lands (those properties 500 to 2,000 acres in size) experienced the greatest decline in ownership acres and total operations from the Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012). The amount of land for mid-sized farms and ranches declined at the rate of about 220,000 acres annually. Mid-sized working lands accounted for over 27 million acres of land statewide or approximately 21 percent of the total working land base. Over 3,400 mid-sized operations representing 3.3 million acres shifted to smaller or larger ownership classes between 1997 and 2012 or were converted to other non-working lands uses (Figures 15 and 16). For both small and mid-sized ownership classes, ownership fragmentation appears to be closely related to proximity to major urban areas and/or transportation corridors (Figure 17). Figure 15. Change in acreage of farms and ranches by size class from 1997-2012 10 Texas Land Trends 2014 Figure 13. Total farm and ranch count from 1997-2012 Figure 14. Total farm and ranch acres from 1997-2012
  • 13. Figure 16. Change in number of farms and ranches by size class from 1997-2012 Figure 17. Increase in number of farms <500 acres in size from 1997-2012 indicating areas of possible land fragmentation Figure 18. Increase in acreage of farms and ranches in the >2,000 acre size class from 1997-2012 Texas Land Trends 2014 11 Consolidation of large ownerships (>2,000 acres) were observed from the Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012) with a net increase of nearly 400,000 acres and approximately 200 individual operations in this category. Large ownerships comprised more than 80 million acres of land statewide, or approximately 62 percent of the total working land base, with only 10,810 individual operations. Consolidation of large ownerships occurred in a few regions of the state and likely may be attributed to investment opportunities pursued by prospective buyers where (1) overall average land values are lower, and (2) opportunities for consolidation are more likely (i.e., larger ownership sizes) (Figure 18). Lower average land values and larger ownership sizes are found in regions such as the High Plains (productive agriculture operations) and South and West Texas, where hunting enterprises appear to be expanding. Consolidation may be driven by the ability of prospective buyers to capitalize on both land values and land availability in the aggregation of large ownerships.
  • 14. 12 Texas Land Trends 2014 Figure 19. Average annual net proceeds per acre for different farm and ranch size classes Finally, Texas Land Trends data (1997-2012) found an association between the profitability of a farm or ranch operation and ownership size. When considered statewide, more than half of all farms and ranches larger than 500 acres reported positive net proceeds (Figure 19). Conversely, small ownerships (i.e., <150 acres) reported increasing net losses on farm and ranch proceeds (Figure 19). Thus, the shift in ownership category or loss of larger ownerships through fragmentation may have potential implications for profitability and continued stability of working lands. Likewise, consolidation into larger operations may be associated with more profitable agricultural operations.
  • 15. Texas Land Trends 2014 13 Future Outlook Since 2000, Texas has been one of the fastest growing states, with a population growth rate that is nearly double, when compared to the rest of the nation (12.7 percent versus 6.4 percent). The Office of the State Demographer projects the state’s population will increase to 41.3 million by 2050—a 191-percent increase from the 1980 population of 14.2 million. Since working land loss is directly related to population growth and associated urban development, future growth in the state will continue to have profound impacts on Texas working lands. With the recent economic recession, a brief pause in working lands conversion and ownership fragmentation occurred; however, with an improved state economy, a return to the trend of rapid working land loss may be anticipated. Acknowledgments Support for Texas Land Trends was made possible by the generous support of the Meadows Foundation, Houston Endowment, Mitchell Foundation, Hershey Foundation and Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service. We also acknowledge the partnership support of the Texas Agricultural Land Trust. Definitions Working lands—privately owned farms, ranches, and forests that produce food and fiber, support rural economies, and provide wildlife habitat, clean air and water, and recreational opportunities. Fragmentation—the break-up of large farms, ranches, and forests into smaller ownership sizes. Consolidation—the combining of smaller farms, ranches, and forests to create larger ownerships. References Potter, L.B., Hogue, W. 2013. Texas Population Projections, 2010 to 2050, Texas State Data Center and Office of the State Demographer, Austin, TX. http://osd.state.tx.us/Publications/2013-01_ProjectionBrief.pdf U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2013. Summary Report: 2010 National Resources Inventory, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. http://www. nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1167354.pdf U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. South, West Have Fastest-Growing Cities, Census Bureau Reports; Three of Top 10 are in Texas Capital Area, U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2013 Population Estimates, Washington, DC. https://www.census. gov/newsroom/press-releases/2014/cb14-89.html
  • 16. Institute of Renewable Natural Resources Texas LandTrends TXLANDTRENDS.ORG IRNR.TAMU.EDU