Mulki Call Girls 7001305949 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best Services
telephone data systems 2002proxy
1. Y
TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
30 North LaSalle Street
Suite 4000
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Phone: (312) 630-1900
Fax: (312) 630-1908
April 17, 2002
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to attend our 2002 annual meeting of shareholders on Thursday, May 23, 2002, at
10:00 a.m., Chicago time, at Northern Trust Bank, 50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, in the Assembly Room
on the 6th Floor. At the meeting, we will report on the plans and accomplishments of Telephone and Data
Systems, Inc.
The formal notice of the meeting, our board of directors’ proxy statement and our 2001 annual report are
enclosed. At our 2002 annual meeting, shareholders are being asked to elect four Class III directors.
The board of directors recommends a vote ‘‘FOR’’ its nominees for election as directors.
Our board of directors and members of our management team will be at the annual meeting to meet with
shareholders and discuss our record of achievement and plans for the future. We would like to have as many
shareholders as possible represented at the meeting. Therefore, please sign and return the enclosed proxy card(s),
whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
We look forward to visiting with you at the annual meeting.
Very truly yours,
Walter C.D. Carlson LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.
Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer
Please help us avoid the expense of follow-up
proxy mailings to shareholders by
signing and returning the enclosed proxy card(s) promptly
PLEASE NOTE: Due to heightened building security, attendees of the annual meeting will be
required to register for admittance and obtain a visitor’s badge. Registration will begin at
9:30 a.m. A registration table will be in the lobby near the LaSalle Street entrance. You will be
asked to present a valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. You will
not be permitted into the elevators without a badge.
2. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
AND
PROXY STATEMENT
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF
TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
The 2002 annual meeting of shareholders of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be
held at Northern Trust Bank, 50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, in the Assembly Room on the 6th Floor on
Thursday, May 23, 2002, at 10:00 a.m., Chicago time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect four Class III members of the board of directors. Your board of directors recommends that you
vote FOR its nominees for Class III directors.
2. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
We are first mailing this notice of annual meeting and proxy statement to you on or about April 17, 2002.
VOTING INFORMATION
What is the record date for the meeting?
We have fixed the close of business on March 27, 2002, as the record date for the determination of sharehold-
ers entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting or any adjournments thereof.
A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting, arranged in alphabetical order and by
voting group, showing the address of and number of shares held by each shareholder, will be kept open at the
offices of TDS, 30 North LaSalle Street, 40th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60602, for examination by any shareholder
during normal business hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the annual meeting.
What shares of stock entitle holders to vote at the meeting?
We have the following classes or series of stock outstanding, each of which entitle holders to vote at the
meeting:
• Common Shares;
• Series A Common Shares; and
• Preferred Shares.
The Common Shares are listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol ‘‘TDS.’’
No public market exists for the Series A Common Shares, but the Series A Common Shares are convertible on
a share-for-share basis into Common Shares.
No public market exists for the Preferred Shares. The Preferred Shares are divided into series, some of which
are convertible into Common Shares. All holders of Preferred Shares vote together with the holders of Common
Shares and Series A Common Shares, except in the election of directors. In the election of directors, all outstanding
Preferred Shares vote together with the holders of Series A Common Shares.
How will the different classes or series of shares vote in the election of directors?
Our board of directors is divided into three classes. Each year, one class is elected to serve for three years. At
our 2002 annual meeting of shareholders, four Class III directors will be elected for a term of three years or until their
successors are elected and qualified.
The holders of Series A Common Shares and the holders of the outstanding Preferred Shares, voting as a
group, will be entitled to elect three Class III directors. The holders of Common Shares will be entitled to elect one
Class III director.
3. The following shows certain information relating to the outstanding shares and voting power of such shares as
of the record date:
Number of Number of
Directors Class III
Elected by Directors
Outstanding Votes Per Voting Voting Standing
Class or Series of Common Stock Shares Share Power Group for Election
Series A Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,690,539 10 66,905,390
Preferred Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70,774 1 70,774
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,976,164 8 3
Common Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,934,088 1 51,934,088 4 1
Total Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4
How may I vote in the election of directors?
Shareholders may, with respect to the election of the Class III directors to be elected by such shareholders:
• vote FOR the election of such director nominees; or
• WITHHOLD authority to vote for such director nominees.
Our board of directors recommends a vote FOR its nominees for election as Class III directors.
How does the TDS Voting Trust intend to vote?
The Voting Trust under Agreement dated June 30, 1989, as amended (the ‘‘TDS Voting Trust’’) holds 6,210,058
Series A Common Shares, representing approximately 93% of the Series A Common Shares. By reason of such
holding, the TDS Voting Trust has the voting power to elect all of the directors elected by the Series A Common
Shares and Preferred Shares and has approximately 52% of the voting power with respect to matters other than the
election of directors.
The TDS Voting Trust has advised us that it intends to vote FOR the board of directors’ nominees for election as
Class III directors by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares.
The TDS Voting Trust does not have any votes with respect to directors elected by the holders of Common
Shares.
How do I vote?
Whether or not you intend to be present at the meeting, please sign and mail your proxy in the enclosed
self-addressed envelope to Computershare Investor Services, 2 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60602. If you
hold more than one class of our shares, you will find enclosed a separate proxy card for each holding. To assure
that all your shares are represented, please return the enclosed proxy cards, as follows:
• a white proxy card for Common Shares, including Common Shares owned through the TDS dividend
reinvestment plan and through the TDS tax-deferred savings plan;
• a green proxy card for Series A Common Shares, including Series A Common Shares owned through the
dividend reinvestment plan; and
• a tan proxy card for Preferred Shares.
How will proxies be voted?
All properly executed and unrevoked proxies received in the accompanying form in time for our 2002 annual
meeting of shareholders will be voted in the manner directed on the proxies.
If no direction is made, a proxy by any shareholder will be voted FOR the election of the board of directors’
nominees to serve as Class III directors.
Proxies given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked at any time prior to the closing of polls at the annual
meeting, by written notice to the Secretary of TDS or attendance at the annual meeting of shareholders and notice
to the Secretary of such revocation. Proxies may not be revoked after the polls are closed for voting.
2
4. What constitutes a quorum for the meeting?
In the election of directors, where a separate vote by a class or classes is required, the holders of a majority of
the votes of the stock of such class or classes, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum
entitled to take action with respect to that vote on the matter.
What vote is required to elect directors?
The election of the Class III directors requires the affirmative vote of holders of a plurality of the votes of the
shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote with respect to such director at the annual
meeting. Accordingly, if a quorum exists, each person receiving a plurality of the votes of the shareholders entitled
to vote with respect to the election of such Class III director will be elected to serve as a Class III director. A majority
of the votes entitled to be cast with respect to the election of such Class III directors by such voting group
constitutes a quorum for action on such proposal. Withheld votes and non-votes with respect to the election of such
Class III directors will not affect the outcome of the election of such directors.
PROPOSAL
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The board of directors’ nominees for election as Class III directors are identified in the tables below. In the event
any such nominee, who has expressed an intention to serve if elected, fails to stand for election, the persons named
in the proxy presently intend to vote for a substitute nominee designated by the board of directors.
Nominees
Class III Directors—Terms to Expire in 2005
The following persons, if elected at our 2002 annual meeting of shareholders, will serve as directors until the
2005 annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified:
Nominee for Election by Holders of Common Shares
Position with TDS Served as
Name Age and Principal Occupation Director since
Herbert S. Wander . . . . . 67 Director of TDS and Partner, Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenman, 1968
Chicago, Illinois
Nominees for Election by Holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares
Position with TDS Served as
Name Age and Principal Occupation Director since
LeRoy T. Carlson . . . . . . . 85 Director and Chairman Emeritus of TDS 1968
Walter C. D. Carlson . . . . 48 Director and non-executive Chairman of the Board of TDS 1981
and Partner, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Chicago, Illinois
Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson . . 41 Director of TDS, Physician and Assistant Clinical Professor at 1996
George Washington University Medical Center
Background of Nominees
Herbert S. Wander. Herbert S. Wander has been a partner of Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenman for more than
five years. Mr. Wander is a current Class III director who was elected by the holders of Common Shares.
LeRoy T. Carlson. LeRoy T. Carlson was elected Chairman Emeritus of TDS in February 2002. Prior to that, he
was Chairman of TDS for more than five years. He is a Director of United States Cellular Corporation (American
Stock Exchange listing symbol: USM), a subsidiary of TDS which operates and invests in cellular telephone
companies and properties (‘‘U.S. Cellular’’). Mr. Carlson is the father of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Walter C. D. Carlson
and Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson. He is a current Class III director who was elected by the holders of Series A Common
Shares and Preferred Shares.
3
5. Walter C. D. Carlson. Walter C. D. Carlson was elected non-executive Chairman of the Board of the board of
directors of TDS in February 2002. He has been a partner of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood for more than five years.
He is a Director of U.S. Cellular. Walter C. D. Carlson is the son of LeRoy T. Carlson and the brother of LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. and Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson. The law firm of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood provides legal services to TDS
and its subsidiaries on a regular basis. Mr. Carlson is a current Class III director who was elected by the holders of
Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares.
Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson. Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson has been a physician and Assistant Professor at George
Washington University Medical Center for more than five years and an Assistant Clinical Professor since 2001.
Dr. Carlson is the daughter of LeRoy T. Carlson and the sister of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. and Walter C. D. Carlson.
Dr. Carlson is a current Class III director who was elected by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred
Shares.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote ‘‘FOR’’ the above-named nominees for director.
The following additional information is provided in connection with the election of directors.
Other Directors
Class I Directors—Terms to Expire in 2003
The following persons are current Class I Directors whose terms will expire at the 2003 annual meeting of
shareholders:
Elected by Holders of Common Shares
Position with TDS Served as
Name Age and Principal Occupation Director since
Martin L. Solomon . . . . . . 65 Director of TDS and Private Investor 1997
Elected by Holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares
Position with TDS Served as
Name Age and Principal Occupation Director since
James Barr, III . . . . . . . . . 62 Director of TDS and President and Chief Executive Officer of 1990
TDS Telecommunications Corporation
Sandra L. Helton . . . . . . . 52 Director and Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer 1998
of TDS
George W. Off . . . . . . . . . 55 Director of TDS and Private Investor 1997
Background of Class I Directors
Martin L. Solomon. Martin L. Solomon is a Director of American Country Holdings, Inc., an insurance
holding company. He was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Country Holdings, Inc. from
June 1997 until February 2001. Prior to that time, Mr. Solomon had been occupied primarily as a private investor
since 1990. He is the former Vice Chairman and Director of Great Dane Holdings, Inc. and, in addition to TDS and
American Country Holdings, Inc., is currently a Director of Hexcel Corporation, a manufacturer of composite
materials.
James Barr, III. James Barr, III has been President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of TDS
Telecommunications Corporation (‘‘TDS Telecom’’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TDS which operates local tele-
phone companies, for more than five years.
Sandra L. Helton. Sandra L. Helton was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in
October of 2000. She joined TDS as Executive Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer in August 1998.
Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Helton was the Vice President and Corporate Controller of Compaq Computer
Corporation between 1997 and 1998. Prior to that time, Ms. Helton was employed by Corning Incorporated for more
than five years. At Corning Incorporated, Ms. Helton was Senior Vice President and Treasurer between 1994 and
1997 and was Vice President and Treasurer between 1991 and 1994. Pursuant to the terms of Ms. Helton’s
4
6. employment letter agreement, dated August 7, 1998, Ms. Helton was appointed as a Class I Director of the board of
directors in November 1998 and is also a Director of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. Ms. Helton was elected to the
board of directors of The Principal Financial Group, a global financial institution, effective May 21, 2001.
George W. Off. George W. Off was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Catalina Marketing Corporation, a
New York Stock Exchange listed company, from July 1998 until he retired in July 2000. Mr. Off served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of Catalina from 1994 to 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Off was President and Chief Operating
Officer between 1992 and 1994 and its Executive Vice President between 1990 and 1992. Catalina is a leading
supplier of in-store electronic scanner-activated consumer promotions. Mr. Off is a Director of SPAR Group, Inc., a
provider of merchandising services for retailers and consumer package goods manufacturers.
Class II Directors—Terms to Expire in 2004
The following persons are current Class II Directors whose terms will expire at the 2004 annual meeting of
shareholders:
Elected by Holders of Common Shares
Position with TDS Served as
Name Age and Principal Occupation Director since
Michael D. Bills . . . . . . . . 44 Director of TDS and Chief Investment Officer—University of 2001
Virginia Investment Management Company
Kevin A. Mundt . . . . . . . . 48 Director of TDS and Vice President and Director of Mercer 1997
Management Consulting
Elected by Holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares
Position with TDS Served as
Name Age and Principal Occupation Director since
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. . . . . 55 Director and President of TDS (Chief Executive Officer) 1968
Donald C. Nebergall . . . . 73 Director and Consultant to TDS and other companies 1977
Background of Class II Directors
Michael D. Bills. Michael D. Bills has been the Chief Investment Officer—University of Virginia Investment
Management Company since June 2001. Prior to that time, he was a Professor of Finance at the McIntire School of
Commerce at the University of Virginia from 2000 to 2001, and Senior Managing Director and Chief Operating
Officer of Tiger Management, L.L.C., a global money management firm, from 1995 to 1999.
Kevin A. Mundt. Kevin A. Mundt has been Vice President and Director of Mercer Management Consulting, a
management consulting firm, since 1997. Prior to that time, he was a co-founder, and had been a director since
1984, of Corporate Decisions, Inc., a strategy consulting firm, which merged with Mercer Management Consulting
in 1997.
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., has been TDS’s President and Chief Executive Officer for more
than five years. Mr. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. is also Chairman and a Director of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. He is the
son of Mr. LeRoy T. Carlson and the brother of Mr. Walter C. D. Carlson and Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson.
Donald C. Nebergall. Donald C. Nebergall has been a consultant to TDS and other companies since 1988.
Mr. Nebergall was Vice President of The Chapman Company, a registered investment advisory company located in
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, from 1986 to 1988. Prior to that, he was the Chairman of Brenton Bank & Trust Company,
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, from 1982 to 1986, and was its President from 1972 to 1982.
5
7. COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS
Board of Directors
The board of directors held six meetings during 2001. Each person who was a director during all of 2001
attended at least 75% of the meetings.
Stock Option Compensation Committee
The stock option compensation committee approves the annual salary, bonus and other cash compensation
for the President, considers and approves long-term compensation for executive officers and considers and
recommends to the board of directors any changes to long-term compensation plans or policies. The current
members of the stock option compensation committee are: George W. Off (Chairman) and Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson.
All meetings and other actions of the stock option compensation committee in 2001 were attended or taken by both
members of the committee.
Compensation Committee
The primary function of the compensation committee is to approve the annual salary, bonus and other cash
compensation of officers and key employees of TDS other than the President. The sole member of the compensa-
tion committee is LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., President of TDS. All actions of the compensation committee are taken by
written consent.
Audit Committee
The audit committee of the board of directors of TDS, among other things, reviews external and internal audit
reports and reviews recommendations made by the internal auditing staff and independent public accountants.
The audit committee is currently comprised of three directors who are not past or present employees of TDS or
its affiliates or immediate family members of any past or present employees: Messrs. George W. Off (chairperson),
Donald C. Nebergall and Herbert S. Wander, each of whom qualifies as independent under the rules of the
American Stock Exchange.
The audit committee held five meetings during 2001. Each member of the audit committee attended at least
75% of the meetings held during the period such person was a member in 2001.
6
8. REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE
This report is submitted by the current members of the audit committee of the board of directors of TDS. The
audit committee operates under a written charter adopted by the TDS board of directors.
Management is responsible for TDS’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. TDS has an internal
audit staff, which performs testing of internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent
accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of TDS’s consolidated financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and issuing a report thereon. The audit committee’s
responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
In this context, the audit committee held meetings with management, the internal audit staff and representa-
tives of Arthur Andersen LLP TDS’s independent accountants for 2001. In these meetings, the audit committee
,
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Management represented to the audit committee that TDS’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the audit committee has reviewed and discussed
the consolidated financial statements with management and representatives of Arthur Andersen.
The discussions with Arthur Andersen also included the matters required to be discussed by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended, relating to information regarding
the scope and results of the audit. In particular, the audit committee reviewed with Arthur Andersen its judgment as
to the quality, not just the acceptability of TDS’s accounting principles. The audit committee also received from
Arthur Andersen written disclosures and a letter regarding its independence as required by Independence Stan-
dards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, as amended, and this information
was discussed with Arthur Andersen.
Based on, and in reliance upon these discussions, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors
that the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 be included in TDS’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
The audit committee also determined that the payment of certain fees for non-audit services does not conflict
with maintaining Arthur Andersen’s independence.
By the members of the audit committee of the board of directors of TDS:
George W. Off Donald C. Nebergall Herbert S. Wander
Chairperson
7
9. FEES PAID TO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS
The following sets forth the aggregate fees billed by TDS’s principal accountants, Arthur Andersen, for 2001:
Audit Fees(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... $1,179,390
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation
Fees(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 0
All Other Fees(3)
Federal and state tax accounting services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,193,797
Property tax planning assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,383
Audit related fees: registration statements/comfort letters . . . . . 38,000
Benchmarking tool subscription . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,000
Subtotal of all other fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,323,180
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,502,570
(1) Represents the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the annual financial statements for the year 2001 and
the reviews of the financial statements included in TDS’s Form 10-Qs for 2001.
(2) Represents the aggregate fees billed for financial information systems design and implementation (as described in Rule 2-01(c)(4)(ii) of
Regulation S-X of the SEC), rendered by Arthur Andersen for the year 2001.
(3) Represents fees billed by Arthur Andersen, as identified above, other than services covered in (1) or (2) above, for the year 2001.
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Arthur Andersen served as our independent public accountants for the 2001 fiscal year. Representatives of
Arthur Andersen are expected to be present at the 2002 annual meeting of shareholders and will have the
opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions raised by shareholders at such meeting
or submitted in writing to the Secretary prior thereto.
On March 14, 2002, Arthur Andersen was indicted on federal charges of obstruction of justice arising from the
federal government’s investigation of Enron Corp. Arthur Andersen has pled not guilty and indicated that it intends
to contest the indictment. As a public company, we are required to file with the SEC periodic financial statements
audited or reviewed by an independent public accountant. The SEC has stated that it will continue accepting
financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen, and interim financial statements reviewed by it, so long as Arthur
Andersen is able to make certain representations to its clients concerning audit quality controls. TDS is monitoring
developments relating to these matters and is considering the implications of such matters on our audit and
quarterly review requirements.
Although we are not required to obtain shareholder ratification of the selection of our independent public
accountants, in recent years we had requested shareholders to ratify our selection of auditors at the annual
meeting. As of the date of this proxy statement, TDS’s audit committee and board of directors have not concluded
the selection of our auditors for 2002. TDS has recently distributed a request for and received proposals relating to
the engagement of an independent public accountant for 2002 and subsequent years. It is not expected that Arthur
Andersen will be engaged to audit the 2002 financial statements. This action is not being undertaken due to any
disagreements with Arthur Andersen. Because no decision relating to such matter has been made as of the date of
this proxy statement, the board of directors is not submitting a proposal at the 2002 annual meeting of shareholders
to request that shareholders ratify the selection of TDS’s independent public accountants for 2002. This decision
will be made by the board of directors based on the recommendation of the audit committee.
8
10. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In addition to the executive officers identified in the tables regarding the election of directors, set forth below is a
table identifying current officers of TDS and its subsidiaries who may be deemed to be executive officers of TDS for
disclosure purposes under the rules of the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated, the position held is an office of TDS.
Name Age Position
John E. Rooney . . . . . . . . . . . 59 President and CEO of United States Cellular Corporation
Scott H. Williamson . . . . . . . . . 51 Senior Vice President—Acquisitions and Corporate Development
Thomas A. Burke . . . . . . . . . . 48 Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Michael K. Chesney . . . . . . . . 46 Vice President—Corporate Development
George L. Dienes . . . . . . . . . . 71 Vice President—Corporate Development
Kevin C. Gallagher . . . . . . . . . 54 Vice President and Corporate Secretary
Jerry A. Gleisner . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Vice President—Corporate Systems
C. Theodore Herbert . . . . . . . . 66 Vice President—Human Resources
Rudolph E. Hornacek . . . . . . . 74 Vice President—Engineering
D. Michael Jack . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Vice President and Corporate Controller
J. Timothy Kleespies . . . . . . . . 51 Vice President—Tax
Peter L. Sereda . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Vice President and Treasurer
Mark A. Steinkrauss . . . . . . . . 56 Vice President—Corporate Relations
James W. Twesme . . . . . . . . . 49 Vice President—Corporate Finance
Byron A. Wertz . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Vice President—Corporate Development
Michael G. Hron . . . . . . . . . . . 57 General Counsel and Assistant Secretary
Background of Executive Officers
John E. Rooney. John E. Rooney has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular since
April 10, 2000. Mr. Rooney was previously employed by Ameritech Corporation for more than five years most
recently as President of Ameritech Consumer Services and, prior to that, as President of Ameritech Cellular
Services. Mr. Rooney is also a director of U.S. Cellular pursuant to his employment letter agreement described
below in ‘‘Other Agreements.’’
Scott H. Williamson. Scott H. Williamson was appointed Senior Vice President—Acquisitions and Corporate
Development of TDS in February 1998. Prior to that time, he was Vice President—Acquisitions of TDS since 1995.
Thomas A. Burke. Thomas A. Burke was appointed Vice President and Chief Information Officer as of April 1,
2000. Prior to that, he was employed by TDS for more than five years, most recently as President of TDS Computing
Services, a division of TDS.
Michael K. Chesney. Michael K. Chesney has been Vice President—Corporate Development of TDS for
more than five years.
George L. Dienes. George L. Dienes has been Vice President—Corporate Development of TDS for more
than five years.
Kevin C. Gallagher. Kevin C. Gallagher was appointed Vice President and Corporate Secretary on Decem-
ber 1, 2001. He was also appointed Vice President and Corporate Secretary of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom in
December 2001. Prior to that time, he was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of 360o Communi-
cations Company between 1996 and 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Gallagher was Vice President and General Counsel of
Sprint Cellular Company between 1993 and 1996.
Jerry A. Gleisner. Jerry A. Gleisner was appointed Vice President—Corporate Systems as of November 9,
2000. Prior to that, he was employed by TDS for more than five years, most recently as TDS Computing Services
Vice President—Corporate Systems.
C. Theodore Herbert. C. Theodore Herbert has been Vice President—Human Resources of TDS for more
than five years.
Rudolph E. Hornacek. Rudolph E. Hornacek has been Vice President—Engineering of TDS for more than
five years. He was a director of TDS until his resignation in November 1998. He is currently Director Emeritus of TDS.
Mr. Hornacek is a Director of TDS Telecom.
9
11. D. Michael Jack. D. Michael Jack was appointed Vice President and Corporate Controller of TDS in Novem-
ber 1999. Prior to joining TDS, Mr. Jack was employed by Cummins Engine Company, Inc. for more than five years.
At Cummins Engine Company, Mr. Jack was Executive Director of its financial services division between 1998 and
1999; Chief Financial Officer of the industrial business unit between 1996 and 1998; and Controller of worldwide
operations prior to 1996.
J. Timothy Kleespies J. Timothy Kleespies was appointed Vice President—Tax in October 2000. Prior to
joining TDS, Mr. Kleespies was employed by Universal Foods Corporation from 1999 to 2000 as Director of
Corporate Taxes and by Stone Container Corporation from 1988 to 1999 as Director of Corporate Taxes and Tax
Counsel.
Peter L. Sereda. Peter L. Sereda was appointed Vice President and Treasurer of TDS in February 1998. Prior
to joining TDS, he was employed by Specialty Foods Corporation, a privately held company which produces meat
and bakery products, between 1994 and 1998. At Specialty Foods Corporation, Mr. Sereda was Vice President of
Finance—Operations between 1997 and 1998, and was Vice President and Treasurer between 1994 and 1997.
Mark A. Steinkrauss. Mark A. Steinkrauss was appointed Vice President—Corporate Relations of TDS in
March 1998. Prior to joining TDS, Mr. Steinkrauss was employed by Fruit of the Loom, Inc., an international apparel
company, for more than five years, most recently as Vice President of Corporate Relations.
James W. Twesme. James W. Twesme was appointed Vice President—Corporate Finance of TDS in Janu-
ary 1999. Prior to that time, he was the Assistant Treasurer of TDS for more than five years.
Byron A. Wertz. Byron A. Wertz has been a Vice President—Corporate Development of TDS for more than
five years. Mr. Wertz is the nephew of LeRoy T. Carlson and the cousin of each of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Walter C. D.
Carlson and Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson.
Michael G. Hron. Michael G. Hron was appointed General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of TDS in
November 1999. Prior to that time, he was the Secretary of TDS for more than five years. He was also appointed
General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom in December 1999. He has been a
partner at the law firm of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood for more than five years. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood
provides legal services to TDS and its subsidiaries.
All of TDS’s executive officers devote substantially all their time to TDS or its subsidiaries, except for Michael G.
Hron who is a practicing attorney.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary of Compensation
The following table summarizes the compensation paid by TDS to the President and Chief Executive Officer of
TDS and the other four most highly compensated executive officers (based on the aggregate of the salary and
bonus for 2001).
10
12. Summary Compensation Table(1)
Long-Term Compensation
Awards
Annual Compensation Restricted Securities
Other Annual Stock Underlying All Other
Name and Principal Position Year Salary(2) Bonus(3) Compensation(4) Award(s)(5) Options/SARs(6) Compensation(7)
LeRoy T. Carlson . . . . . . . . 2001 $547,000 $ — $ — — 15,590 $41,052
Chairman Emeritus 2000 501,000 266,000 72,500 — 52,360 57,187
1999 458,000 240,000 69,600 — 17,600 65,072
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. . . . . . . 2001 $780,000 $378,000 $ — — 29,429 $36,507
President (Chief Executive 2000 708,750 500,000 72,500 — 88,720 36,765
Officer) 1999 630,000 504,000 — — 27,850 27,619
Sandra L. Helton . . . . . . . . 2001 $460,000 $310,000 $ — — 12,115 $41,738
Executive Vice President— 2000 420,000 278,000 — — 43,320 34,508
Chief Financial Officer 1999 381,000 270,000 — — — 89,423
James Barr III . . . . . . . . . . 2001 $458,000 $298,000 $ — — 6,785 $44,331
President (Chief Executive 2000 419,000 251,000 — — 30,400 43,781
Officer) of TDS 1999 384,000 203,000 — — — 31,426
Telecommunications
Corporation
John E. Rooney(8) . . . . . . . 2001 $485,459 $190,000 $55,414 $396,911 20,000 $20,570
President (Chief Executive 2000 309,375 190,000 55,414 — 55,000 2,815
Officer) of United States 1999 — — — — — —
Cellular Corporation
(1) Does not include the discount amount under any dividend reinvestment plan or any employee stock purchase plan because such plans are
generally available to all eligible shareholders or salaried employees, respectively. Does not include the value of any perquisites and other
personal benefits, securities or property because the aggregate amount of such compensation is less than the lesser of either $50,000 or
10% of the total of annual salary and bonus reported for the above-named executive officers.
(2) Represents the dollar value of base salary (cash and non-cash) earned by the named executive officer during the fiscal year identified.
(3) Represents the dollar value of bonus (cash and non-cash) earned (whether received in cash or deferred) by the named executive officer for
2001, 2000 and 1999. Final bonuses for 2001 have not yet been determined for LeRoy T. Carlson and LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. The amount listed
above for LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. represents a partial advance of his 2001 bonus. See ‘‘Executive Officer Compensation Report.’’
(4) Represents the fair market value of phantom stock units credited to such officer with respect to deferred bonus compensation. See ‘‘Bonus
Deferral and Stock Unit Match Program.’’ LeRoy T. Carlson deferred 100% of his 1999 bonus, LeRoy T. Carlson and LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.,
deferred the lesser of 100% of their 2000 bonuses or $250,000 and LeRoy T. Carlson has elected to defer the lesser of 100% of his 2001
bonus or $250,000 pursuant to the TDS 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Because the bonus for 2001 has not yet been determined for
LeRoy T. Carlson the dollar value of the Company match phantom stock units cannot be determined at this time.
(5) Represents the value of 6,682 restricted U.S. Cellular Common Shares granted to Mr. Rooney based on the closing price of U.S. Cellular
Common Shares on the date of grant.
(6) Represents the number of shares subject to stock options and /or stock appreciation rights (‘‘SARs’’) awarded during the fiscal year
identified. Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the awards represent options without tandem SARs and relate to TDS Common Shares,
except for John E. Rooney, in which case the awards represent options with respect to U.S. Cellular shares.
(7) Includes contributions by the Company for the benefit of the named executive officer under the TDS tax-deferred savings plan (‘‘TDSP’’), the
TDS pension plan (‘‘Pension Plan’’), including earnings accrued under a related supplemental benefit agreement, the TDS supplemental
executive retirement plan (‘‘SERP’’) and the dollar value of any insurance premiums paid during the covered fiscal year with respect to life
insurance for the benefit of the named executive (‘‘Life Insurance’’), as indicated below for 2001:
LeRoy T. LeRoy T. Sandra L. John E.
Carlson Carlson, Jr. Helton James Barr III Rooney
TDSP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,120 $ 6,120 $ 6,120 $ 6,120 $ 6,120
Pension Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,528 8,316 13,575 13,375 7,788
SERP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 21,118 21,425 21,628 4,410
Life Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 953 618 3,208 2,252
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $41,052 $36,507 $41,738 $44,331 $20,570
(8) All of Mr. Rooney’s compensation is paid by U.S. Cellular. Mr. Rooney’s annual compensation is approved by LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., the
Chairman of U.S. Cellular, and Mr. Rooney’s long-term compensation is approved by the stock option compensation committee of U.S.
Cellular. Mr. Rooney was hired on April 10, 2000.
11
13. General Information Regarding Options and SARs
The following tables show, as to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table,
information regarding options and/or SARs.
Individual Option/SAR Grants in 2001
Potential Realizable
Value at
Assumed Annual
Number of Realized Stock Price
Securities % of Total Appreciation
Underlying Options/SARs for Option Terms(4)
Options/SARs Granted to Exercise Market Expiration
Name Granted(1) Employees(2) Price Price(3) Date 5% 10%
LeRoy T. Carlson(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,590 7.2% $ 99.44 $ 99.44 04/30/11 $ 974,956 $ 2,470,730
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.(5) . . . . . . . . . . 29,429 13.6% $ 99.44 $ 99.44 04/30/11 $1,840,410 $ 4,663,959
Sandra L. Helton(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,115 5.6% $ 99.44 $ 99.44 04/30/11 $ 757,639 $ 1,920,006
James Barr III(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,785 3.1% $ 99.44 $ 99.44 04/30/11 $ 424,315 $ 1,075,299
John E. Rooney(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000 3.6% $ 59.40 $ 59.40 03/31/11 $ 747,127 $ 1,893,366
(1) Represents the number of TDS shares underlying options awarded during the year, except in the case of John E. Rooney, in which case the
amount represents the number of U.S. Cellular shares underlying options or SARs awarded during the fiscal year.
(2) Represents the percent of total TDS shares underlying options awarded to all TDS employees during the fiscal year, except in the case of
John E. Rooney, in which case the figure represents the percent of total U.S. Cellular shares underlying options awarded to all U.S. Cellular
employees during the fiscal year.
(3) Represents the per share fair market value of shares as of the award date.
(4) Represents the potential realizable value of each grant of options, assuming that the market price of the shares underlying the options
appreciates in value from the award date to the end of the option term at the indicated annualized rates.
(5) Pursuant to the TDS long-term incentive plan, on April 30, 2001 such named executive officers were granted options (the ‘‘2000 Perform-
ance Options’’) to purchase TDS Common Shares based on the achievement of certain levels of corporate and individual performance in
2000 as contemplated by the TDS long-term incentive plan. The purchase price per TDS Common Share subject to the 2000 Performance
Options is the average of the closing price of the TDS Common Shares on the American Stock Exchange for the 20 trading days ended on
the trading day immediately preceding the grant date. The 2000 Performance Options became exercisable on December 15, 2001.
(6) These represent options with respect to U.S. Cellular Common Shares. Such options were granted as of May 29, 2001 and become
exercisable with respect to 20% of the shares underlying the option on March 31 of each year beginning in 2002 and ending in 2006.
12
14. AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN 2001, AND
DECEMBER 31, 2001 OPTION/SAR VALUE
As of December 31, 2001
2001 Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised In-the-Money
Shares Options/SARs(3) Options/SARs(4)
Acquired on Value
Name Exercise(1) Realized(2) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
LeRoy T. Carlson
2000 Performance Options(5) . . . . . . — $ — 15,590 — $ — $ —
2000 Automatic Options(6) . . . . . . . . — — 8,590 25,770 — —
1999 Performance Options(7) . . . . . . — — 18,000 — — —
1998 Performance Options(8) . . . . . . — — 17,600 — 404,800 —
1998 Automatic Options(9) . . . . . . . . — — 39,600 — 1,821,600 —
1997 Performance Options(10) . . . . . — — 17,820 — 891,000 —
1996 Performance Options(11) . . . . . — — 8,295 — 380,491 —
1995 Performance Options(12) . . . . . — — 9,367 — 394,819 —
1994 Performance Options(13) . . . . . — — 9,476 — 489,246 —
1994 Automatic Options(14) . . . . . . . — — 36,050 — 1,519,868 —
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ — 180,388 25,770 $5,901,824 $ —
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.
2000 Performance Options(5) . . . . . . — $ — 29,429 — $ — $ —
2000 Automatic Options(6) . . . . . . . . — — 14,180 42,540 — —
1999 Performance Options(7) . . . . . . — — 32,000 — — —
1998 Performance Options(8) . . . . . . — — 27,850 — 640,550 —
1998 Automatic Options(9) . . . . . . . . — — 54,600 — 2,511,600 —
1997 Performance Options(10) . . . . . — — 27,300 — 1,365,000 —
1996 Performance Options(11) . . . . . — — 11,770 — 539,890 —
1995 Performance Options(12) . . . . . — — 13,233 — 557,771 —
1994 Performance Options(13) . . . . . — — 13,114 — 677,076 —
1994 Automatic Options(14) . . . . . . . 47,100 2,939,511 — — — —
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,100 $2,939,511 223,476 42,540 $6,291,887 $ —
Sandra L. Helton
2000 Performance Options(5) . . . . . . — $ — 12,115 — $ — $ —
2000 Automatic Options(6) . . . . . . . . — — 6,330 18,990 — —
1999 Performance Options(7) . . . . . . — — 18,000 — — —
1998 Automatic Options(15). . . . . . . . — — 36,000 — 2,011,680 —
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ — 72,445 18,990 $2,011,680 $ —
James Barr III
2000 Performance Options(5) . . . . . . — $ — 6,785 — $ — $ —
2000 Options(16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 12,160 18,240 — —
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ — 18,945 18,240 $ — $ —
John E. Rooney
2001 USM Automatic Options(17) . . . — $ — — 20,000 $ — $ —
2000 USM Initial Options(18) . . . . . . . — — 11,000 44,000 — —
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ — 11,000 64,000 $ — $ —
(1) Represents the number of TDS Common Shares with respect to which the options or SARs were exercised or, in the case of John E. Rooney,
Common Shares of U.S. Cellular (‘‘USM shares’’).
(2) Represents the aggregate dollar value realized upon exercise, based on the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value
of the shares on the date of exercise.
(3) Represents the number of TDS Common Shares subject to options and/or SARs, except for John E. Rooney, in which case the information
is presented with respect to USM shares. All options are transferable to permitted transferees.
(4) Represents the aggregate dollar value of in-the-money, unexercised options and SARs held at the end of the fiscal year, based on the
difference between the exercise price and $89.75, the market value of TDS Common Shares on December 31, 2001 or, with respect to
options for USM shares, $45.25, the market value of USM Common Shares on December 31, 2001.
(5) Such options became exercisable on December 15, 2001 and are exercisable until April 30, 2011 at the exercise price of $99.44 per share.
(6) Such options become exercisable in annual increments of 25% on December 15, 2001 and on each anniversary of such date until
December 15, 2004 and are exercisable until September 15, 2010 at the exercise price of $121.12 per share.
13
15. (7) Such options became exercisable on December 15, 2000 and are exercisable until May 5, 2010 at the exercise price of $105.13 per share.
(8) Such options became exercisable on December 15, 1999 and are exercisable until April 30, 2009 at the exercise price of $66.75 per share.
(9) Such options became exercisable with respect to one-third of the shares on each of December 15, 1998, December 15, 1999 and
December 15, 2000, and are exercisable until November 5, 2007 at the exercise price of $43.75 per share.
(10) Such options became exercisable on December 15, 1998 and are exercisable until June 22, 2008 at the exercise price of $39.75 per share.
(11) Such options became exercisable on December 15, 1997 and are exercisable until December 15, 2007 at the exercise price of $43.88 per
share.
(12) Such options became exercisable on December 15, 1996 and are exercisable until December 15, 2006 at the exercise price of $47.60 per
share.
(13) Such options became exercisable on December 15, 1995 and are exercisable until December 15, 2005 at the exercise price of $38.12 per
share.
(14) Such options became exercisable in annual increments of 20% on each of December 15, 1994 and on the first through the fourth
anniversaries of such date, and are exercisable until November 4, 2004 at the exercise price of $47.59 per share.
(15) Such options became exercisable with respect to 12,000 shares on December 15, 1998, December 15, 1999 and December 15, 2000, are
exercisable until September 15, 2008 at an exercise price of $33.87 per share.
(16) Such options become exercisable in annual increments of 20% on December 15, 2000 and on each anniversary of such date through
December 15, 2004 and are exercisable until March 10, 2010 at the exercise price of $104.00 per share.
(17) The 2001 USM Automatic Options become exercisable in annual increments of 20% on March 31 of each year beginning in 2002 and
ending in 2006, and are exercisable until March 31, 2011 at an exercise price of $59.40.
(18) The 2000 USM Initial Options become exercisable with respect to 20% of the shares underlying the option on April 10 of each year,
beginning in 2001 and ending in 2005, and are exercisable until April 10, 2010 at an exercise price of $69.19 per share.
TDS Telecom Phantom Incentive Option Plan
James Barr III participated in the TDS Telecom phantom stock incentive plan (the ‘‘TDS Telecom Plan’’). The
TDS Telecom Plan was adopted by TDS Telecom in 1997 and related to the five-year period beginning on January 1,
1995 and ending on December 31, 1999. Under the TDS Telecom Plan, Mr. Barr was awarded certain phantom
stock units by the Chairman of TDS Telecom. The award consisted of automatic awards and performance awards.
The automatic awards vested in five equal annual installments beginning on December 15, 1995. The performance
awards included a corporate performance award and an individual performance award. The performance awards
vested on December 15 of the year following the performance year to which they relate. When vested, the phantom
stock option units became exercisable at an exercise price determined in accordance with the terms of the plan. All
phantom stock unit options expire on July 1, 2003. Upon exercise of the phantom stock units, Mr. Barr will receive a
cash payment equal to the difference between the exercise price and the implied value of the phantom stock unit as
provided in the TDS Telecom Plan.
Mr. Barr received his last performance award in 2000 for 1999 performance.
Mr. Barr has vested options with respect to a total of 124,617 phantom stock units which may be exercised until
July 1, 2003.
Pension Plans and Supplemental Benefit Agreements
The TDS employees’ pension trust (the ‘‘TDS Target Pension Plan’’) was a defined contribution plan designed
to provide retirement benefits for eligible employees of TDS and certain of its affiliates which adopted the TDS
Target Pension Plan. Annual employer contributions based upon actuarial assumptions were made under a formula
designed to fund a target pension benefit for each participant commencing generally upon the participant’s
attainment of retirement age. The amounts of the annual contributions are included above in the Summary
Compensation Table under ‘‘All Other Compensation.’’
U.S. Cellular previously had adopted the TDS wireless companies’ pension plan (the ‘‘Wireless Pension Plan’’).
The Wireless Pension Plan, a qualified non-contributory defined contribution pension plan, provided pension
benefits for employees of U.S. Cellular. Under the Wireless Pension Plan, pension contributions were calculated
separately for each participant, based on a fixed percentage of the participant’s qualifying compensation, and are
funded currently. The amount of the annual contributions for John E. Rooney is included above in the Summary
Compensation Table under ‘‘All Other Compensation.’’
14
16. Effective January 1, 2001, the TDS Target Pension Plan was merged with and into the Wireless Pension Plan
and the new merged plan has been titled the TDS Pension Plan. All of the plan assets which had been held for the
TDS Target Pension Plan and the Wireless Pension Plan were combined to be held on a consolidated basis for the
new TDS Pension Plan, which will pay all benefits which previously accrued under both the TDS Target Pension
Plan and the Wireless Pension Plan and all future pension plan accruals. All eligible participants who have been
receiving target pension benefits under the TDS Target Pension Plan will continue to be eligible for target pension
benefits under the TDS Pension Plan. Similarly, eligible participants who have been receiving a pension benefit
contribution based on a fixed percentage of their qualifying compensation under the Wireless Pension Plan will
continue to be eligible for such benefit under the TDS Pension Plan. All newly eligible employees of both TDS and
U.S. Cellular and their affiliates will only be eligible for the pension benefit contribution based on a fixed percentage
of qualifying compensation as previously provided under the Wireless Pension Plan.
The TDS supplemental executive retirement plan (‘‘SERP’’) has provided supplemental benefits under the TDS
Pension Plan and the Wireless Pension Plan and effective January 1, 2001, the new TDS Pension Plan. The SERP
was established to offset the reduction of benefits caused by the limitation on annual employee compensation
which can be considered for tax qualified pension plans under the Internal Revenue Code. The SERP is a
non-qualified deferred compensation plan and is intended to be unfunded. The amounts of the accruals for the
benefit of the named executive officers are included above in the Summary Compensation Table under ‘‘All Other
Compensation.’’
In 1980, TDS entered into a non-qualified supplemental benefit agreement with LeRoy T. Carlson which, as
amended, requires TDS to pay a supplemental retirement benefit to Mr. Carlson in the amount of $47,567 plus
interest at a rate equal to 1⁄4% under the prime rate for the period from May 15, 1981 (the date of Mr. Carlson’s 65th
birthday) to May 31, 1992, in five annual installments beginning June 1, 2001, plus interest at 91⁄2% compounded
semi-annually from June 1, 1992. The agreement was entered into because certain amendments made to the TDS
Pension Plan in 1974 had the effect of reducing the amount of retirement benefits, which Mr. Carlson would receive
under the TDS Pension Plan. The payments to be made under the agreement, together with the retirement benefits
under the TDS Pension Plan, were designed to permit Mr. Carlson to receive approximately the same retirement
benefits he would have received had the TDS Pension Plan not been amended. All the interest accrued under this
agreement is included above in the Summary Compensation Table under ‘‘All Other Compensation’’ and identified
in footnote 7 thereto as contributions under the TDS Pension Plan.
Deferred Compensation Agreements
James Barr III is party to an executive deferred compensation agreement, pursuant to which a specified
percentage of his gross compensation is deferred and credited to a deferred compensation account. The deferred
compensation account is credited with interest compounded monthly, computed at a rate equal to one-twelfth of
the sum of the average thirty-year Treasury Bond rate plus 1.25 percentage points until the deferred compensation
amount is paid to such person. The amount of compensation deferred by such person is included in and reported
with all other non-deferred compensation in the ‘‘Summary Compensation Table.’’ No amount is included in the
Summary Compensation Table for the interest earned on such deferred compensation because such interest rate is
intended to approximate a market rate.
Bonus Deferral and Stock Unit Match Program
The 1998 long-term incentive plan (the ‘‘1998 Plan’’) provides the opportunity for those who are employed by
TDS at the position of Vice President or above to defer receipt of a portion of their bonuses and receive TDS
matching stock unit credits. Executives may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of their annual bonuses and to
receive stock unit matches on the amount deferred up to $250,000. Deferred compensation will be deemed
invested in phantom TDS Common Shares. TDS match amounts will depend on the amount of annual bonus that is
deferred into stock units. Participants receive a 25% stock unit match for amounts deferred up to 50% of their total
annual bonus and a 33% match for amounts that exceed 50% of their total annual bonus. The matched stock units
vest ratably at a rate of one-third per year over three years. The fair market value of the matched stock units is
reported in the Summary Compensation Table under ‘‘Other Annual Compensation.’’
LeRoy T. Carlson elected to defer 100% of his 1999 bonus under the 1998 Plan. LeRoy T. Carlson and LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. each elected to defer the lesser of 100% of their 2000 bonuses or $250,000. LeRoy T. Carlson has
elected to defer the lesser of 100% of his 2001 bonus or $250,000. Accordingly, each of LeRoy T. Carlson and
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. will receive a 25% stock unit match for 50% of their deferred bonuses and a 33% match for 50%
of their deferred bonuses up to $250,000 for such years under the 1998 Plan. The bonus for 2001 has not yet been
15
17. determined for LeRoy T. Carlson and, therefore, the dollar value of the company match phantom stock units cannot
be determined at this time. See the ‘‘Summary Compensation Table.’’
In addition, U.S. Cellular has a similar plan pursuant to which John E. Rooney may defer compensation and
receive stock unit matches with respect to U.S. Cellular Common Shares. Any stock unit matches received by
Mr. Rooney are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under ‘‘Other Annual Compensation.’’
Other Agreements
TDS has entered into an agreement with LeRoy T. Carlson whereby it will employ Mr. Carlson until he elects to
retire from TDS. Mr. Carlson is to be paid at least $60,000 per annum until his retirement. The agreement also
provides that upon his retirement, Mr. Carlson will be retained by TDS as a part-time consultant (for not more than
60 hours in any month) until his death or disability. Upon his retirement, Mr. Carlson will receive $75,000 per annum
as a consultant, plus increments beginning in 1985 equal to the greater of three percent of his consulting fee or
two-thirds of the percentage increase in the consumer price index for the Chicago metropolitan area. If Mr. Carlson
becomes disabled before retiring, TDS can elect to discontinue his employment and retain him in accordance with
the consulting arrangement described above. Upon Mr. Carlson’s death (unless his death follows his voluntary
termination of his employment or the consulting arrangement), his widow will receive until her death an amount
equal to that which Mr. Carlson would have received as a consultant. TDS may terminate payments under the
agreement if Mr. Carlson becomes the owner of more than 21% of the stock, or becomes an officer, director,
employee or paid agent of any competitor of TDS within the continental United States. No amounts were paid or
payable under this agreement in 2001, 2000 or 1999, and no amounts related thereto are included above in the
Summary Compensation Table.
Sandra L. Helton was hired pursuant to the terms of a letter agreement with TDS dated August 7, 1998. The
obligations of TDS under such letter agreement with respect to initial compensation and benefits have been
satisfied. Ms. Helton continues to be entitled to be considered for annual salary reviews and a bonus opportunity
based on performance. The letter agreement also provided that Ms. Helton would receive a seat on the TDS board
of directors.
Pursuant to an employment letter agreement, John E. Rooney was entitled to a base salary at the annual rate of
$450,000 per year through December 31, 2000, with a performance review following year-end 2000. The agreement
provided that, assuming a start date of April 10, 2000, Mr. Rooney would receive a minimum bonus prorated for nine
months of 2000 of $169,000 and that, if Mr. Rooney and his team exceed business plan objectives, his 2000 bonus
could increase. Starting in 2001, Mr. Rooney’s target bonus opportunity is 50% of his base salary for the year and is
based on U.S. Cellular’s results for the year. With superior performance, he will be eligible for bonus awards
significantly above the targeted 50% level. Pursuant to the letter agreement, Mr. Rooney received a grant of stock
options with respect to 55,000 U.S. Cellular Common Shares. The letter agreement provides that Mr. Rooney is also
entitled to an annual grant of U.S. Cellular restricted stock beginning March 31, 2001, and to a seat on the U.S.
Cellular Board of Directors.
Compensation of Directors
The board of directors has adopted a compensation plan (the ‘‘Non-Employee Directors’ Plan’’) for
non-employee directors. A non-employee director is a director of TDS who is not an employee of TDS or its
affiliates, U.S. Cellular or TDS Telecom. The purpose of the Non-Employee Directors’ Plan is to provide reasonable
compensation to non-employee directors for their services to TDS, and to induce qualified persons to serve as
non-employee members of the board of directors.
The Non-Employee Directors’ Plan provides that each non-employee director will receive an annual director’s
fee of $24,000; and each non-employee director will receive a fee of $1,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable
expenses incurred in connection with travel to, and attendance at, each regularly scheduled or special meeting of
the board of directors. The Non-Employee Directors’ Plan also provides that each non-employee director of TDS
will receive a fee of $750, plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with
travel to, and attendance at, each meeting of the audit committee, stock option compensation committee or other
committee established by the board of directors.
Under the Non-Employee Directors’ Plan, an amount equal to 50% of the annual director’s fee will be paid
immediately prior to TDS’s annual meeting of shareholders by the delivery of Common Shares of TDS having a fair
market value as of the date of payment equal to such percentage of the annual fee. In addition, under the
Non-Employee Directors’ Plan, an amount equal to 33% of each committee meeting fee will be accumulated and
16
18. paid immediately prior to TDS’s annual meeting of shareholders by the delivery of Common Shares of TDS having a
fair market value as of the date of payment equal to such percentage of such fee. TDS has reserved 15,000 TDS
Common Shares of TDS for issuance pursuant to the Non-Employee Directors’ Plan.
Donald C. Nebergall, a director of TDS, was paid $60,000 for consulting services provided to TDS in 2001.
In addition, TDS pays life insurance premiums on behalf of its directors. Except for such life insurance
premiums, directors who are also employees of TDS or any affiliate do not receive any additional compensation for
services rendered as directors.
Executive Officer Compensation Report
This report is submitted by LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., President, who serves as the compensation committee of the
board of directors for all executive officers of TDS (other than the President), and by the TDS stock option
compensation committee of the board of directors which approves all compensation for the President and
approves long-term compensation for executive officers who are employees of TDS. Long-term compensation for
John E. Rooney is approved by the stock option compensation committee of U.S. Cellular (as described in its report
in the proxy statement of U.S. Cellular).
TDS’s compensation policies for executive officers are intended to provide incentives for the achievement of
corporate and individual performance goals and to provide compensation consistent with the financial perform-
ance of TDS. TDS’s policies establish incentive compensation performance goals for executive officers based on
factors over which such officers have control and which are important to TDS’s long-term success. Compensation
should be appropriate to the financial performance of TDS and should be sufficient to enable TDS to attract and
retain individuals possessing the talents required for long-term successful performance.
Executive compensation consists of both annual and long-term compensation. Annual compensation consists
of base salary and an annual bonus. Annual compensation decisions are based partly on individual and corporate
short-term performance and partly on the individual and corporate cumulative long-term performance during the
executive’s tenure in his or her position, particularly with regard to the President (chief executive officer). Long-term
compensation is intended to compensate executives primarily for their contributions to long-term increases in
shareholder value and is generally provided through the grant of stock options.
The process of determining base salary begins with establishing an appropriate salary range for each officer,
based upon the particular duties and responsibilities of the officer, as well as salaries for comparable positions with
other companies. These other companies include those in the peer group index described below under ‘‘Stock
Performance Chart’’, as well as other companies in the telecommunications industry and other industries with
similar characteristics. The President is provided with information about executive compensation at other compa-
nies, as reported in proxy statements and salary surveys published by various organizations. The President uses
these sources and makes the determination of appropriate ranges for each executive officer based on his informed
judgment, using the information provided to him by the Vice President of Human Resources, as discussed below.
The range is not based on any formal analysis nor is there any documentation of the range. The base salary of each
officer is set within this range based on an assessment of the responsibilities and the performance of such officer,
also taking into account the performance of TDS and/or its business units or divisions, other comparable compa-
nies, the industry and the overall economy during the preceding year. The salary of each of the executive officers is
believed to be at or slightly above the median of the range considered to be appropriate in the judgment of the
President.
Annually, the nature and extent of each executive officer’s personal accomplishments and contributions for the
year are determined, based on information submitted by the executive and by others familiar with his or her
performance, including the executive’s direct supervisor. The President evaluates the information in terms of the
personal objectives established for such executive officer for the performance appraisal period. The President also
makes an assessment of how well TDS did as a whole during the year and the extent to which the President believes
the executive officer contributed to the results. With respect to executive officers having primary responsibility over
a certain business unit or division of TDS, the President considers the performance of the business unit or division
and the contribution of the executive officer thereto. No specific measures of performance are considered determi-
native in the compensation of executive officers. Instead, all the facts and circumstances are taken into considera-
tion by the President. Ultimately, it is the informed judgment of the President that determines an executive’s salary
and bonus.
17
19. The primary focus of TDS is increasing long-term shareholder value through growth, measured primarily in such
terms as revenues, customer units in service, operating cash flow (operating income plus depreciation and amortiza-
tion) and operating income. However, there is no quantifiable relationship between compensation and such measures
of performance. Instead, compensation decisions are made subjectively, considering certain performance measures,
as well as other appropriate facts and circumstances.
The President of TDS also approves annual bonus compensation for executive officers of TDS and each of its
business units or divisions. The Vice President-Human Resources prepares appropriate information, for the annual
compensation reviews of executive officers. TDS has no written or formal corporate executive bonus plan. The
bonuses for corporate executive officers are determined by the President based on his evaluation of each execu-
tive’s contribution to TDS, the achievement of individual objectives, the performance of TDS and/or its business
units and divisions and all other facts and circumstances considered appropriate in his judgment. The 2001
bonuses approved for the named executives are listed above in the Summary Compensation Table.
The annual compensation of the President (Chief Executive Officer) of TDS is approved by the stock option
compensation committee. The Vice President—Human Resources prepares for the committee an analysis of
compensation paid to chief executive officers of other comparable companies, including the companies in the peer
group index described below under ‘‘Stock Performance Chart’’, as well as other companies in the telecommunica-
tions industry and other industries, to the extent considered appropriate, based on similar size, function, geography
or otherwise. This information is presented to the stock option compensation committee, which approves the final
base salary and bonus of the President based on such information. The stock option compensation committee
approved a bonus of $500,000 for the President for the year 2000, and increased his 2001 base salary to $780,000,
representing an increase of $71,250 or 10.1% over his base salary of $708,750 in 2000. The stock option compen-
sation committee has not yet approved the President’s bonus for 2001 or the President’s base salary for 2002. As
with the other executive officers, the compensation of the President is determined on the basis of the committee’s
analysis of multiple factors rather than specific measures of performance. The stock option compensation commit-
tee has access to numerous performance measures and financial statistics prepared by TDS. This financial
information includes the audited financial statements of TDS, as well as internal financial reports such as budgets
and their results, operating statistics and other analyses. The stock option compensation committee may also
consider such other factors the committee deems appropriate in making its compensation decisions. Ultimately, it
is the informed judgment of the stock option compensation committee, after reviewing the compensation informa-
tion provided by the Vice President—Human Resources, that determines the salary and bonus for the President.
As discussed above, the primary focus of TDS is the increase of long-term shareholder value through growth,
measured primarily in such terms as revenues, customer units in service, operating cash flow (operating income
plus depreciation and amortization) and operating income. However, as discussed above, there is no quantifiable
relationship between compensation and such measures of performance. Instead, compensation decisions are
made subjectively, considering certain performance measurers, as well as all other appropriate facts and
circumstances.
The stock option compensation committee believes that the total compensation (base salary and bonus) of the
President has been set at a level less than the average for executives at companies which it considers comparable.
Each of the members of the committee base this belief on his or her personal assessment and judgment of the
President’s responsibilities in comparison to those of chief executive officers and chief operating officers of the
companies included in the peer group index described below under ‘‘Stock Performance Chart’’, as well as other
companies in the telecommunications industry and other industries with similar characteristics, based on the
information prepared by the Vice President—Human Resources, as discussed above. The President has a substan-
tial beneficial interest in TDS, as described below under ‘‘Security Ownership of Management’’, and will benefit
together with other shareholders based on the performance of TDS. The committee has taken this fact into account
in its review and approval of the President’s salary and bonus.
The President may also recommend to the stock option compensation committee long-term compensation in
the form of additional stock option grants, stock appreciation rights or otherwise for executive officers. The
long-term compensation decisions for executive officers are made by the stock option compensation committee in
a manner similar to that described for annual base salary and bonus decisions, except that the stock options will
generally vest over several years, in order to reflect the goal of relating long-term compensation of executive
officers, including the President, to increases in shareholder value over the same period.
The performance of TDS is also a factor in determining the number of stock options which will be awarded and
become exercisable with respect to the executive officers. As indicated under the table ‘‘Individual Option/SAR
18
20. Grants in 2001’’, certain named executive officers received an award of Performance Options in 2001 based on the
achievement of certain levels of corporate and individual performance in 2000.
Section 162(m) of the Code. Subject to certain exceptions, section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
generally provides a $1 million annual limit on the amount that a publicly held corporation is allowed to deduct as
compensation paid to each of the corporation’s chief executive officer and the corporation’s other four most highly
compensated officers. TDS does not believe that the $1 million deduction limitation should have a material effect on
TDS in the immediate future. If the $1 million deduction limitation is expected to have a material effect on TDS in the
future, TDS will consider ways to maximize the deductibility of executive compensation, while retaining the
discretion TDS deems necessary to compensate executive officers in a manner commensurate with performance
and the competitive environment for executive talent.
This Executive Officer Compensation Report is submitted by LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., sole member of the
compensation committee and by the stock option compensation committee: George W. Off (Chairman) and
Dr. Letitia G. C. Carlson.
Stock Performance Chart
The following chart graphs the performance of the cumulative total return to shareholders (stock price
appreciation plus dividends) during the previous five years in comparison to returns of the Standard & Poor’s 500
Composite Stock Price Index and a peer group index. The peer group index was constructed specifically for TDS
and includes the following companies: ALLTEL Corp., Centennial Communications Corp. (formerly known as
Centennial Cellular Corp.) (Class A), CenturyTel, Inc. (formerly known as Century Telephone Enterprise, Inc.),
Citizens Communications Co. (formerly known as Citizen Utilities) (Series B), Rural Cellular Corp. (Class A, IPO Feb
1996), Western Wireless Corp. (Class A, IPO May 1996) and TDS. In calculating the peer group index, the returns of
each company in the group have been weighted according to such company’s market capitalization at the
beginning of the period.
19
21. COMPARATIVE FIVE-YEAR TOTAL RETURNS*
TDS, S&P 500, PEER GROUP
(PERFORMANCE RESULTS THROUGH 12/31/01)
$400
$350
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Telephone & Data S&P 500 Peer Group
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
TDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.00 $129.75 $126.57 $356.95 $256.22 $256.94
S&P 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.00 $133.36 $171.48 $207.56 $188.66 $166.24
Peer Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.00 $130.18 $183.72 $349.46 $255.00 $241.46
Assumes $100.00 invested at the close of trading on the last trading day preceding the first day of the fifth
preceding fiscal year in TDS Common Shares, S&P 500 and Peer Group.
*Cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The sole member of the compensation committee is LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., President of TDS. The primary
function of the compensation committee is to approve the annual salary, bonus and other cash compensation of
officers and key employees of TDS other than the President. Mr. Carlson, is a member of the board of directors of
TDS, U.S. Cellular, and TDS Telecom. He is also the Chairman of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom and, as such,
approves the executive officer annual compensation decisions for U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. Mr. Carlson is
compensated by TDS for his services to TDS and all its subsidiaries. However, U.S. Cellular reimburses TDS for a
portion of such compensation pursuant to intercompany agreements between TDS and such subsidiaries. The
stock option compensation committee of the board of directors of TDS makes annual compensation decisions for
the President of TDS and makes long-term compensation decisions for all executive officers who are employees of
TDS. The members of the stock option compensation committee are George W. Off (Chairman) and Dr. Letitia G. C.
Carlson. The members of the stock option compensation committee are neither officers nor employees of TDS or
any of its subsidiaries nor directors of any of TDS’s subsidiaries. Long-term compensation for executive officers
who are employees of U.S. Cellular is approved by the stock option compensation committee of U.S. Cellular. The
stock option compensation committee of U.S. Cellular is composed of directors of such subsidiary who are neither
officers nor employees of TDS or any of its subsidiaries nor directors of TDS.
In addition to such compensation committee interlocks and insider participation in compensation decisions,
TDS and certain related parties are involved in the following relationships and transactions.
20
22. Other Relationships and Related Transactions. Walter C. D. Carlson, a director and non-executive Chairman
of the Board of the board of directors of TDS and a director of U.S. Cellular, Michael G. Hron, the General Counsel
and an Assistant Secretary of TDS, U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom, and the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of
certain other TDS subsidiaries, William S. DeCarlo, the Assistant General Counsel of TDS and an Assistant
Secretary of TDS and certain TDS subsidiaries, and Stephen P Fitzell, the Assistant General Counsel of U.S. Cellular
.
and TDS Telecom and an Assistant Secretary of certain other TDS subsidiaries, are partners of Sidley Austin
Brown & Wood, the principal law firm of TDS and its subsidiaries. Walter C. D. Carlson is a trustee and beneficiary of
a voting trust, which controls TDS.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
On February 28, 2002, TDS had outstanding and entitled to vote 51,824,928 Common Shares, par value $.01
per share (excluding 3,853,276 Common Shares held by TDS and 484,012 Common Shares held by a subsidiary of
the Company); 6,775,973 Series A Common Shares, par value $.01 per share; and 74,423 Preferred Shares, par
value $.01 per share.
Each of the outstanding Common Shares and Preferred Shares is entitled to one vote and each of the
outstanding Series A Common Shares is entitled to ten votes. Accordingly, the voting power of all outstanding
Series A Common Shares was 67,759,730 votes. The total voting power of all outstanding shares of all classes of
capital stock was 119,659,081 votes at February 28, 2002 with respect to matters other than the election of
directors.
Security Ownership of Management
The following table sets forth as of February 28, 2002, or the latest practicable date, the number of Common
Shares and Series A Common Shares beneficially owned, and the percentage of the outstanding shares of each
such class so owned by each director and nominee for director of TDS, by each of the executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table and by all directors and executive officers as a group.
Amount and Percent of
Nature of Percent of Shares of
Name of Individual or Beneficial Class or Common Percent of
Number of Persons in Group Title of Class or Series Ownership(1) Series Stock Voting Power(2)
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.,
Walter C. D. Carlson,
Letitia G. C. Carlson and
Prudence E. Carlson(3) . . . . Series A Common Shares 6,295,492 92.9% 10.7% 52.6%
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.,
Sandra L. Helton,
C. Theodore Herbert,
Peter L. Sereda,
and Michael G. Hron(4) . . . . Common Shares 26,973 * * *
Series A Common Shares 73,576 1.1% * *
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.,
Sandra L. Helton,
C. Theodore Herbert,
Peter L. Sereda,
and Michael G. Hron(5) . . . . Common Shares 155,549 * * *
LeRoy T. Carlson (6)(12) . . . . . Common Shares 193,794 * * *
Series A Common Shares 52,099 * * *
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.(7)(12) . . . Common Shares 237,372 * * *
Series A Common Shares 17,178 * * *
Walter C. D. Carlson(8) . . . . . . Common Shares 373 * * *
Series A Common Shares 843 * * *
Letitia G. C. Carlson(9) . . . . . . Common Shares 321 * * *
Series A Common Shares 910 * * *
Sandra L. Helton(12) . . . . . . . . Common Shares 75,601 * * *
James Barr III(12) . . . . . . . . . . Common Shares 23,996 * * *
Michael D. Bills . . . . . . . . . . . . Common Shares 24 * * *
Donald C. Nebergall(11) . . . . . Common Shares 1,033 * * *
Series A Common Shares 1,009 * * *
Herbert S. Wander . . . . . . . . . Common Shares 1,107 * * *
21