This document summarizes a presentation on the health economics of immunotherapy. It discusses trends showing increasing allergic rhinitis prevalence and expenditures dominated by prescription medications. While evidence demonstrates clinical and economic benefits of immunotherapy (SIT), access, coverage, and utilization have not increased. Two studies of Medicaid patients are summarized, finding poor adherence to SCIT and economic benefits of $800-5,400 annually from SIT versus symptomatic treatment. Overall it argues more work is needed to demonstrate SIT value to increase acceptance and adoption.
Immunotherapy in children SCIT or SLIT. Dra. Desirée Larenas WISC Dec2014 ...Juan Carlos Ivancevich
Symposium: Immunotherapy in Latin America - WISC 2014- Rio de Janeiro
Symposium 5: Latin American Society of Allergy and Immunology (SLAAI) Symposium: Immunotherapy in Latin America Sala 1 & 2 (Sul America)
Immunotherapy in children SCIT or SLIT. Dra. Desirée Larenas WISC Dec2014 ...Juan Carlos Ivancevich
Symposium: Immunotherapy in Latin America - WISC 2014- Rio de Janeiro
Symposium 5: Latin American Society of Allergy and Immunology (SLAAI) Symposium: Immunotherapy in Latin America Sala 1 & 2 (Sul America)
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms & acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis 2019
Presented by Nattasasi Suchamalawong, MD.
November 15, 2019
Hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsNatacha Santos
Reis-Ferreira A, Santos N, Botelho C, Castro E, Cernadas JR. Hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: single versus multiple reactors. Allergy 2011;66(Suppl.94):51-52.
Presentation entitled "Drug Allergy: what have we learned from immunogenetics?", updated and published in Portuguese as an open access full-text "Santos N, Cernadas J. Imunogenética das reacções alérgicas a fármacos. Rev Port Imunoalergologia 2013;23(4):247-258."
Immunotherapy Europe - The Perfect Combination of Strategy and Innovation Michael Adeniya
Phacilitate's Immunotherapy Europe will bring leaders in the field together. big phama, biotech, payers, HTAs, regulators and investors. See what's being discussed at Europe's ONLY commercial meeting for Immunotherapy!
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms & acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis 2019
Presented by Nattasasi Suchamalawong, MD.
November 15, 2019
Hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsNatacha Santos
Reis-Ferreira A, Santos N, Botelho C, Castro E, Cernadas JR. Hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: single versus multiple reactors. Allergy 2011;66(Suppl.94):51-52.
Presentation entitled "Drug Allergy: what have we learned from immunogenetics?", updated and published in Portuguese as an open access full-text "Santos N, Cernadas J. Imunogenética das reacções alérgicas a fármacos. Rev Port Imunoalergologia 2013;23(4):247-258."
Immunotherapy Europe - The Perfect Combination of Strategy and Innovation Michael Adeniya
Phacilitate's Immunotherapy Europe will bring leaders in the field together. big phama, biotech, payers, HTAs, regulators and investors. See what's being discussed at Europe's ONLY commercial meeting for Immunotherapy!
In 2011, the treatment armamentarium dramatically expanded with the approval of the anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab and the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Oncology nurses who care for patients with melanoma are beginning to administer these new agents and have numerous questions regarding their efficacy, different response patterns, unique toxicity profiles, how they may be integrated into current treatment regimens, and how to educate patients on their benefits and risks.
Downloadable slide decks are a great tool for self study and teaching purposes. They are non-certified resources available to enhance your knowledge.
Review a downloadable slide deck by Peg Esper, MSN, MSA, RN, APN-BC, AOCN®, covering the most clinically relevant new data reported from Metastatic Melanoma: An Oncology Nurse Workshop on Novel Treatments, Adverse Event Management, and Patient Education.
Target Audience
This activity has been designed to meet the educational needs of oncology nurses involved in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma.
Slide Deck Disclaimer
This slide deck in its original and unaltered format is for educational purposes and is current as of May 2012. All materials contained herein reflect the views of the faculty, and not those of IMER, the CE provider, or the commercial supporter. These materials may discuss therapeutic products that have not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and off-label uses of approved products. Readers should not rely on this information as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The use of any information provided is solely at your own risk, and readers should verify the prescribing information and all data before treating patients or employing any therapeutic products described in this educational activity.
For more information:
http://imeronline.com/gxpsites/hgxpp001.aspx?11,52,304,O,E,0,,744;561;8362
Patient & Family Education: A Multi-modal approach to improve the experienceWellbe
This session will describe educational concepts to enhance the orthopaedic patient experience. The elective nature of orthopedic surgery creates an opportunity to intervene with patients and family early and often throughout the episode of care. Multimodal teaching strategies (individual, group learning, written materials and web based tools) delivered prior to surgery and reinforced multiple times across care transitions can reduce anxiety, increase satisfaction, improve ability to manage pain and help patients feel more prepared for surgery.
Improving the patient experience is increasingly important as quality and satisfaction metrics are becoming linked to reimbursement. Transitional care interventions, such as discharge planning, follow up calls with emphasis on participation in self care have shown to improve continuity of care, reduce readmissions and prevent poor health outcomes.
About the Speaker:
Jack Davis MSN, RN, ONC is the Manager of Patient Education Programs at Hospital for Special Surgery in NYC. Jack has over 30 years experience in orthopaedic nursing. He has been an active member of the National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses (NAON) since 1991. Jack currently serves as Director of the Orthopaedic Nurses Certification Board (ONCB). He is passionate about preparing patients and family for surgery and seeks to improve nursing practice through research, promoting specialty certification and nursing continuing education.
n overview of current immunotherapy therapies used to treat cancer. Also provides MOA of various medications, and updates on SITC guidelines for metastatice melanoma.
A talk presented by Prof. Mohamed Labib Salem at Minofia University محاضرة للأستاذ الدكتور محمد لبيب سالم جامعة طنطا يوم الثلاثاء السادس عشر من فبراير بجامعة المنوفية
Dr. Patrick Hwu presents the latest information on immunotherapies for melanoma at the MRF's Patient Symposium at MD Anderson Cancer Center on January 31, 2015.
Dr. Michael Davies presents the latest information on targeted melanoma therapies at the MRF's Patient Symposium at MD Anderson Cancer Center on January 31, 2015.
The international survey on the management of allergic rhinitis by physicians...Georgi Daskalov
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Open Access
The international survey on the management of
allergic rhinitis by physicians and patients
(ISMAR)
Carlos E Baena-Cagnani
1
†
ˆ
, Giorgio W Canonica
2*
, Mohamed Zaky Helal
3
†
, René Maximiliano Gómez
4
†
,
Enrico Compalati
2
†
, Mario E Zernotti
5
†
, Mario Sanchez-Borges
6
†
, Fabio F Morato Castro
7
†
,
Margarita Murrieta Aguttes
8
†
, Aida López-Garcia
9
†
, Faheem A Tadros
10
†
and ISMAR Study Group
Sinusitis and Immunodeficiency - IDF Conferencesinusblog
This is Dr. Andrew Pugliese's powerpoint on the connection between chronic sinusitis and immunodeficiencies. This was specifically for an educational conference for the Immune Deficiency Foundation.
Respond to this discussion . Add some facts with at least 2 cita.docxcwilliam4
Respond to this discussion . Add some facts with at least 2 citations APA Format
Discussion: Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Case Study
HH is a 68-yr M who has been admitted to the medical ward with community-acquired pneumonia for the past three days. His PMH is
significant for COPD, HTN, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. He remains on empiric antibiotics, including ceftriaxone 1 g IV q day (day 3) and
azithromycin 500 mg IV q day (day 3). Since admission, his clinical status has improved, with decreased oxygen requirements. He is not tolerating a
diet at this time, complaining of nausea and vomiting. Ht: 5'8" Wt: 89 kg Allergies: Penicillin (rash).
Diagnosis: Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
CAP is the term used to describe an acute infection of the lungs that develops outside the hospital setting by an immune-competent
individual who has not been recently hospitalized (Shoar & Musher, 2020). Adults with CAP typically present with cough, fever, sputum production or
shortness of breath, oxygen desaturation, confusion, leukocytosis or leukopenia, and pleuritic chest pain, along with the presence of an acute
infiltrate on the chest radiograph (Shoar & Musher, 2020).
Antibiotic suggested for CAP's empiric treatment is based on agents useful against CAP's major treatable bacterial causes. The bacterial
pathogens responsible for CAP include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Haemophilus
influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Legionella species, and Moraxella catarrhalis (Metlay et al., 2019).
The patient is on right treatment, his clinical status has improved, with decreased oxygen requirement. Recommended treatment plan for
patients with comorbidities such as alcoholism, COPD, post influenza, asplenia, diabetes mellitus, lung/liver/renal diseases include: Combination
of a beta-lactam (ceftriaxone 1 g IV q24h or cefotaxime 1 g IV q8h or ceftaroline 600 mg IV q12h) plus azithromycin 500 mg IV q24h (Donovan, 2019).
The therapy duration is a minimum of 5 days. The patient needs to be afebrile for 48-72 hours, controlled blood pressure, adequate oral intake, and
room air oxygen saturation of greater than 90% and treatment duration can be extended if symptoms are not recovered in some cases (Donovan,
2019).
In this case, the patient symptoms are improving, his oxygen requirement is decreased, but he is not tolerating a diet at this time,
complaining of nausea and vomiting. The patient received antibiotics for three days, so antibiotics need to be continued. With appropriate antibiotic
therapy, some improvement in the patient's clinical course is usually seen within 48 to 72 hours (File, 2020).
Health Needs and Treatment Regimen
The patient is not tolerating diet and complaining of nausea and vom.
Dr. Theoklis Zaoutis - Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship in the Pediatric Out...John Blue
Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship in the Pediatric Outpatient Setting - Dr. Theoklis Zaoutis, Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases, Professor of Pediatrics and Epidemiology of the University of Pennsylvania, from the 2014 NIAA Symposium on Antibiotics Use and Resistance: Moving Forward Through Shared Stewardship, November 12-14, 2014, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2014-niaa-antibiotics-moving-forward-through-shared-stewardship
Presentation delivered by Mr Shaun Flanagan, Corporate Pharmaceutical Unit, Health Service Executive at the Irish Pharmaceutical Healthcare Association Annual Meeting 2009.
Similar to Subcutaneous Immunotherapy: Is it Worth a Shot? Cost-effectiveness of Allergen Immunotherapy (20)
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...Oleg Kshivets
Overall life span (LS) was 1671.7±1721.6 days and cumulative 5YS reached 62.4%, 10 years – 50.4%, 20 years – 44.6%. 94 LCP lived more than 5 years without cancer (LS=2958.6±1723.6 days), 22 – more than 10 years (LS=5571±1841.8 days). 67 LCP died because of LC (LS=471.9±344 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68% vs. 53.7%) (P=0.028 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: N0-N12, T3-4, blood cell circuit, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells-CC and blood cells subpopulations), LC cell dynamics, recalcification time, heparin tolerance, prothrombin index, protein, AT, procedure type (P=0.000-0.031). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and N0-12 (rank=1), thrombocytes/CC (rank=2), segmented neutrophils/CC (3), eosinophils/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), leucocytes/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (error=0.000; area under ROC curve=1.0).
Adv. biopharm. APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETICS : TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMSAkankshaAshtankar
MIP 201T & MPH 202T
ADVANCED BIOPHARMACEUTICS & PHARMACOKINETICS : UNIT 5
APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETICS : TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS By - AKANKSHA ASHTANKAR
NVBDCP.pptx Nation vector borne disease control programSapna Thakur
NVBDCP was launched in 2003-2004 . Vector-Borne Disease: Disease that results from an infection transmitted to humans and other animals by blood-feeding arthropods, such as mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas. Examples of vector-borne diseases include Dengue fever, West Nile Virus, Lyme disease, and malaria.
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/kqbnxVAZs-0
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/SINlygW1Mpc
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Basavarajeeyam is a Sreshta Sangraha grantha (Compiled book ), written by Neelkanta kotturu Basavaraja Virachita. It contains 25 Prakaranas, First 24 Chapters related to Rogas& 25th to Rasadravyas.
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
The Gram stain is a fundamental technique in microbiology used to classify bacteria based on their cell wall structure. It provides a quick and simple method to distinguish between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, which have different susceptibilities to antibiotics
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,sisternakatoto
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group of receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a teamof receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a team wwww.lisywomensclinic.co.za/
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Basavarajeeyam is an important text for ayurvedic physician belonging to andhra pradehs. It is a popular compendium in various parts of our country as well as in andhra pradesh. The content of the text was presented in sanskrit and telugu language (Bilingual). One of the most famous book in ayurvedic pharmaceutics and therapeutics. This book contains 25 chapters called as prakaranas. Many rasaoushadis were explained, pioneer of dhatu druti, nadi pareeksha, mutra pareeksha etc. Belongs to the period of 15-16 century. New diseases like upadamsha, phiranga rogas are explained.
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
Subcutaneous Immunotherapy: Is it Worth a Shot? Cost-effectiveness of Allergen Immunotherapy
1. The Present: Health Economics and Immunotherapy Linda Cox, MD, FAAAAI, FACAAI, FACP 1 Many of the slides provided with permission by Cheryl Hankin, PhD A portion of this research was jointly funded by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunotherapy and the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology
5. ABAI Board of Directors -memberCheryl Hankin , Ph.D. President and Chief Scientific OfficerBioMedEcon LLC Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ph.D. in ClinicalPsychology Two-year postdoctoral fellowship in Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Research funding from AAAAI/ACAAI & JCAAI Julie Andrews in Victor Victoria (1982)
6. Learning objectives At the end of the session attendees will be able to discuss: The evidence demonstrating the clinical and economic comparative effectiveness of SIT Potential gaps in SIT access, coverage, reimbursement, and utilization Adherence to immunotherapy: problems and potential solutions 3
7. Discussion points The Present Increased body of evidence demonstrates the clinical and economic comparative effectiveness of SIT However, SIT access, coverage, reimbursement, and utilization has not gained ground The Past Must be critically evaluated to identify gaps Can direct our course The Future Requires identification, understanding, collaboration, learning, and then education Identify constituents Understand needs that will compellingly support AIT value propositions for each constituent Collaborate so that outcomes of efforts are meaningful Learn!!! Then educate… The role of AIT as “preventive care” may be key Poor adherence (even in the face of extraordinary efficacy) always = failure This needs to be addressed for AIT adoption /acceptance by the non-A/I health care community 4
8. Trends in Total Annual AR-Related Expenditures: 2000 to 2005 5 % Distribution of Total U.S. AR-Related Expenditures Prescription medications consistently account for over half of U.S. AR-related health care expenditures Shares in treatment type have not changed despite increase in published research demonstrating benefits of SIT Soni A. Allergic rhinitis: Trends in use and expenditures, 2000 and 2005. Statistical Brief #204, 2008. Note that dollars originally reported in USD 2005 were adjusted o USD 2010 values using the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau Consumer Price Index for Health Care (http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?cu) .
9. Trends in the U.S. Estimated Prevalence of AR: 2000 and 2005 6 Based on the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Respondents reported experiencing related symptoms, visiting a physician, or obtaining a prescription drug to treat allergic rhinitis. Total U.S. AR-related expenditures nearly doubled from 2000 to 2005 U.S. Estimated Prevalence of AR: 2000 and 2005 85% % of Total U.S. Population $ Billions 22 Million In both 2000 and 2005, more females reported experiencing allergic rhinitis than males (7.6 percent versus 4.9 percent in 2000 and 8.2 percent versus 6.4 percent in 2005).Differences between females and males significant (P<.05) for both 2000 and 2005. Soni A. Allergic rhinitis: Trends in use and expenditures, 2000 and 2005. Statistical Brief #204, 2008.
10. U.S. SCIT Penetration is Minimal 2006 US Allergic Rhinitis Sales — Total Sales = $6.72 B $1252% $1,10016% $5,49782% Rx OTC Immunotherapy Sources: Rx figures from IMS; OTC figures from Chain Drug Review; Immunotherapy based on average of several sources
11. Source of A/I Practice Revenues 8 AIT per new patient visit was 29% in 2009, 33% in 2010, and thus far 27% in 2011: includes old AIT patient restarting Provided with permission David Brown, MD president of Allergy Partners
12. Source: physician diary survey provided with permission Schering-Plough Source: market research, provided with permission by Greer
13. Perceptions of Barriers to Subcutaneous Immunotherapy By Specialty Significantbarrier Not a barrier Source: Market Research Survey, April 2007.
14. Immunotherapy market US & Rest of World 15% Germany 32% Northern Europe 14% Italy 11% France 15% Spain 13% Currently: SIT in the U.S. Received by few potentially appropriate patients (2%-3%)1,2 High rates of premature discontinuation2,3 Wide variation in initiation and persistence by demographic, illness, and insurance characteristics2,3 Provided with permission by Stallergenes 1. Donahue et al . Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999;82:339-47. 2. Hankinet al, . J Allergy ClinImmunol 2008;121:227-32. 3. Hankin, LockeyJ Allergy ClinImmunol 2011;127(1):46-8.
15. SCIT Adherence in US Published Studies 12 Hankin CS, Lockey RF. Patient characteristics associated with allergen immunotherapy initiation and adherence. J Allergy ClinImmunol. 2011;127(1):46-8, 8 e1-3.
16. SCIT Adherence in US Published Studies 258 patients were private and 57 were nonprivate. 59% (n = 152) of private patients and 46% (n = 26) of nonprivate patients were compliant Hankin CS, Lockey RF.. J Allergy ClinImmunol. 2011;127(1):46-8, 8 e1-3.
17. SLIT: What About Adherence/Compliance? Swim With Dolphins, Cut DepressionDesignA trainer directed half of each session; patients played freely with the dolphins during remainder Control group was given an equal amount of attention from human staff. Results. Greater reduction in mean severity of the depressive symptoms in the dolphin therapy group than in the control group
19. Children’s compliance with allergenimmunotherapy according to administration routes Open study 1998 to 2003 comparing SCIT (1886 pts), SLIT (806 pts), LNIT (82 pts) 1234 hospital setting, 1540 private Coverage for immunotherapy services varied per region “Noncompliance” SCIT 10.9% vs SLIT 21.5% (p<.0005) Panjo et al JACI 2005;116
20. Comparison of Reason for Discontinuation Of Immunotherapy Between Different Administration Routes Panjo et al JACI 2005;116:1380-81
32. Public and Private Payer “Push Back”: The Zero-Sum Game Oregon Medicaid, Spring 2010 Prioritized List: AR on Line 573 Below the current funding line (Line 502) “Most patients with AR will not qualify for any treatment for the condition. Patients who also have asthma have immunotherapy available to them on Line 11.” PRIORITIZATION OF HEALTH SERVICES A Report to the Governor and the 76th Oregon Legislative Assembly 2011 Condition: SPASTIC DYSPHONIA Treatment: MEDICAL THERAPY Line: 584 Condition: MACROMASTIA Treatment: BREAST REDUCTION Line: 585 Condition: ALLERGIC RHINITIS AND CONJUNCTIVITIS, CHRONIC RHINITIS Treatment: MEDICAL THERAPY Line: 586 (line 574 in 2008) Condition: CANCER OF LIVER AND INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCTS Treatment: LIVER TRANSPLANT 21
33. Health Economics of SIT (15 Studies from 1995 to 2011) 22 Poor outcomes for SIT are shown in red font. AR = allergic rhinitis; Clin = clinical; FU = follow-up; MR = medical records review; RC = retrospective claims analysis; SDT = symptomatic drug therapy; SIT = allergen-specific immunotherapy; SLIT = sublingual immunotherapy.
34. Pharmacoeconomics of allergen immunotherapy compared with symptomatic drug treatment in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma Method: 30 pts (mean age, 35 yrs ) with Parietaria-induced rhinitis & asthma randomized to SCIT (20 pts) or medications (10 pts) for 3 years Inclusion: PST >5 mm wheal, AR + Ashma (GINA class 2 or 3) for 2 years Evaluated before treatment and annually for 6 years in the pollen period Nose, eyes, and lung symptom scores, and drug consumption via patent diary Economic costs: pt registered monthly:# of medical visit, medications, allergy injections Ariano et al, Allergy Asthma Proc 2006;27
35. Pharmacoeconomics of allergen immunotherapy Significant improvement in symptom scores and medication use after 1st year of treatment Ariano et al, Allergy Asthma Proc 2006;27
36. Sustained significant reductions in cost beginning in the 3rd year subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy Results: significant difference in costs favor of SIT vs control 15% the second year 48% the third year (80% reduction ) 80% reduction maintained up to 6th year, 3 years after stopping immunotherapy Net saving per patient: $830/year. Conclusion: SCIT has significant economic advantages over pharmocotherapy alone Ariano et al Allergy Asthma Proc 2006;27
39. Hankin 2008: $401/6 months = $802 median annual benefit for SIT(children with AR in the 6 months after SIT discontinuation vs 6 months prior to SIT initiation)
40. Hankin 2010: $1,625/18 months = $1,218 mean annual benefit for SITamong children with AR vs match controls not receiving SIT
41.
42. Exploratory Study: Pre-Post SCIT Study in Children Hankin CS, Cox L, Lang D, et al. J Allergy ClinImmunol2008;121:227-32.
43. (among 4,807,429 total Florida Medicaid enrollees) No IT at any time during study period (N=99,342) Newly-diagnosed AR Patients aged < 18 years (N=102,390) < 4 years of data following 1st AR dx (N=2,358) Rec’d IT at any time during study period (N =3,048) IT preceded 1st AR dx (N=170) Sample Identification > 4 years of data following 1st AR dx (N=690) < 6 months FU data after last IT admin (N=166) IT followed 1st AR dx (N=520) 3.0% of children with AR received IT > 6 months FU data after last IT admin (N=354) Hankin CS, Cox L, Lang D, et al. J Allergy ClinImmunol2008;121:227-32.
44.
45. The mean duration of treatment was 17 months (SD 17.6). Hankin CS, Cox L, Lang D, et al. J Allergy ClinImmunol2008;121:227-32.
46.
47. Compared health care use and costs of SAME CHILDREN 6 months pre-SIT initiation versus 6 months post-SIT discontinuation31 Hankin CS, Cox L, Lang D, et al. Allergy immunotherapy among Medicaid-enrolled children with allergic rhinitis: Patterns of care, resource use, and costs. J Allergy ClinImmunol2008;121:227-32.
48.
49. AR = ICD-9 code 477.X. IT = CPT 95115, 95117, 95120, 95125,95144, 95165, 95180, and 95199.
51. Newly diagnosed AR = those whose first AR diagnosis was preceded by a full year in which no AR diagnoses occurred
52. De novo immunotherapy = first documented immunotherapy claim followed (rather than preceded) their first AR diagnosis Analysis: Data were highly skewed Wilcoxon signed rank tests to compare the groups’ 18-month median per-patient health care use and costs Health care components included total inpatient stays, total outpatient visits , total pharmacy fills, and total health care use. 32 Hankin CS, Cox L, Lang D, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol2010;103:79-85.
53. 1-to-5 match Each IT-treated patients was matched on up to 5 controls based on age at first AR diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, and (4) diagnosis of asthma (493.X), conjunctivitis (372.X), or atopic dermatitis (691.8). No AR dx (n=3,208,639) Pts aged <18 yrs (1997-2007) (N=3,472,786) AR dx in yr before 1st AR dx (n=82,326) Only one IT (n=909) IT in yr preceding 1st AR dx (n=139) AR-dx (n=264,147) Pool of control candidates <2 IT admin at any time after 1st AR dx (n=177,111) No AR dx in yr before 1st AR dx (n=181,821) No IT (n=176,202) Represents number of children with AR diagnosis from 1997 to 2007= 7.6% (264,147 / 3,472,786) No IT in yr preceding 1st AR dx (n=181,682) <18 mo of data after 1st IT (n=1,586) ≥2 IT admin at any time after 1st AR dx (n=4,571) “ IT-Treated Patients” Represents newly- AR- diagnosed children = 5.2% (181,821 / 3,472,786) ≥18 mo of data after 1st IT (n=2,985) Represents newly-AR-diagnosed children receiving course of de novo IT= 2.5% (4571 / 181,821) 33 1. Hankin CS, Cox L, Lang D, et al. Allergen immunotherapy and health care cost benefits for children with allergic rhinitis: a large-scale, retrospective, matched cohort study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol2010;103:79-85.
54.
55. Compared 18-month health care use and costs: SIT versus matched non-SIT groups*34 Hankin CS, Cox L, Lang D, et al. Allergen immunotherapy and health care cost benefits for children with allergic rhinitis: a large-scale, retrospective, matched cohort study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol2010;103:79-85.
58. 37 Does Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy Provide Cost Benefits for Children and Adults with Allergic Rhinitis? Results from Large-Scale Retrospective Analyses Jointly Funded by AAAAI and ACAAI Cheryl Hankin, PhD;1 Linda Cox, MD;2 Zhaohui Wang, MS;1 Amy Bronstone, PhD11BioMedEcon, LLC, Moss Beach, CA2Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL Session #274 March 19, 2011, 2:00-3:15 pm Presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunotherapy, March 18-21, 2011 San Francisco, CA Research jointly funded by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunotherapy and the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology
59. Identification of Children Newly Diagnosed with AR Who Received De Novo SIT (for Matching) Medicaid Children (<18 yrs) 7/97-6/08 N=3,604,711 <1 year of data preceding 1st AR claim (“index diagnosis”) with no AR claim filed N=88,688 No AR N=3,310,933 No SIT N=198,729 SIT in prior year N=145 AR N=293,778 <2 SIT admin after index AR dx N=199,772 ≥1 year of data preceding 1st AR claim (“index diagnosis”) with no AR claim filed N=205,090 <18 months of data following 1st SIT N=1,618 ≥2 SIT admin after index AR dx N=5,173 For children, there were 3,305 SIT patients matched to 13,151 non-SIT patients. No SIT in prior year N=204,945 ≥ 18 months of data following 1st SIT N=3,555 38 Hankin et al, Session #274 March 19, 2011 Presented at the 2011 AAAAI
60. Identification of Adults Newly Diagnosed with AR Who Received De Novo SIT (for Matching) <1 year of data preceding 1st AR claim (“index diagnosis”) with no AR claim filed N=29,505 1 SIT N=657 SIT in prior year N=127 No SIT N=58,725 No AR N=2,917,762 Medicaid Adults (≥18 yrs) 7/97-6/08 N=3,008,865 < 2 SIT admin after index AR dx N=59,382 No SIT in prior year N=61,471 <18 months of data following 1st SIT N=590 ≥1 year of data preceding 1st AR claim (“index diagnosis”) with no AR claim filed N=61,598 AR N=91,103 ≥ 18 months of data following 1st SIT N=1,499 ≥2 SIT admin after index AR dx N=2,089 For adults, there were 1,306 SIT patients matched to 5,137 non-SIT patients. Hankin et al, Session #274 March 19, 2011 Presented at the 2011 AAAAI
61. Adults: Significant and progressive differences in all components of health care costs including hospitalization 11-year (1997-2008) retrospective matched cohort claims analysis of Florida Medicaid-enrolled adults newly diagnosed with AR compared 18-month health care use and costs of patients who received SIT and a matched cohort who did not receive SIT* 40
62. Mean, per-Patient, 18-Month Savings for Children with Newly Diagnosed AR Who Received versus Did Not Receive SITNegative Values Denote Savings Conferred by SIT versus Non-SIT Hankin et al, Session #274 March 19, 2011 Presented at the 2011 AAAAI 41
63. SIT Duration Only 18.8% of adults completed a 3-year course of SIT Adults (N=1,265) Only 17.5% of children completed a 3-year course of SIT Children (N=2,886)
64.
65. Agreed that SIT could mitigate the high costs and burden of asthma
68. Primary care’s lack of awareness and low referral ratesCalled upon the specialty to “assume a leadership role in collaborating with primary care physicians to educate them regarding the benefits and risks of immunotherapy and appropriate referral of patients with allergic rhinitis.” Levin A, Eavy G, Burgoyne D, Bordeaux M, Hankin CS. Allergy Immunotherapy Working Group consensus statement. Drug Benefit and Trends2008;20:14-20.
69. Public and Private Payer “Push Back”: Fighting Back Presentations and letters to Oregon Medicaid’s medical director, Health Services Commission (Ariel K. Smits, MD MPH) spearheaded by David Coutin “At this point, additional literature on the effectiveness of treatments for allergic rhinitis would not be helpful.” “The Commission...would be interested in information regarding how treatment of allergic rhinitis impacts healthy life years, burden of suffering, impacts on vulnerable populations, need for medical care, and our other prioritization criteria.” I've spoken again w Director of Oregon HSC. The Commission accepts the findings of Hankin and Cox, but has a rather common issue with Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) payment methodologies for allergy injections, as does Florida. FQHC, where most of medical assistance (MA) patients in OR receive care. They are under federal mandates to bill MA for Dr visits for all encounters with MA patients, thereby driving up overall costs to states to deliver IT Rx. 44
70. SIT as Preventive Care 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) Mission: to identify and reduce the incidence of preventable chronic illness and disability “Preventive Clinical Services” designation U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) supported by the U.S. Department of HHS AHRQ Based on rigorous, evidence-based methods to evaluate the expected net health benefit (benefit minus harm) associated with delivery of a specified service As of September 2010, all new insurance policies fully cover preventive care and screening services that receive a USPSTF grade of A or B No patient co-pays or deductibles can be applied to the cost for these services
71. SIT as Preventive Care: A/I Organization’s Response Specific Allergen Immunotherapy: A Model of Preventive Care for a Large Segment of the United States Population. Ira Finegold, MD, Linda Cox, MD, Cheryl Hankin, PhD: Final draft completed 2/27/2011 approved and submitted by AAAAI/ACAAI/JCAAI
75. Future Directions: The IMprovedAccess to AllerGen-Specific ImmuNothErapy (IMAGINE) Studies 50
76. Allergen Immunotherapy Adherence Task Force Members Amy Bronstone, David Bernstein , Linda Cox, Cheryl Hankin, Dennis Ledford, Karen Murphy & Jim Peterson, Phase 1. Conduct Survey of AAAAI Members to Identify Practice-based Interventions to Improve Patient Adherence to SIT Review and summary of the literature on AIT adherence- Contact extract manufacturers to request they share data on AIT adherence: Collect information from VA/Armed services on AIT refills, adherence, etc Develop questionnaire for membership survey Database for first AIT adherence survey- possibly use the existing AAAAI/ACAAI Immunotherapy Safety Surveillance study data base More intensive survey of randomly selected practices and their patients: Identify when, where and why patient prematurely discontinue ATT Identify Patient-Reported Factors that Influence Adherence to AIT Identify practice interventions used to improve patient adherence Phase 2. Test Interventions Expected to Improve Patient Adherence to AIT Phase 3 Develop Report with In-Depth Description of Interventions that Most Effectively and Efficiently Improve Patient Adherence to AIT 51
77. ALL Medicaid-enrolled patients July 1997- June 2009 (N= 7,524,231 ) Patients diagnosed with AR (477.x) in childhood: AR-Diagnosed patients < 18 years at 1st AR claim (“index AR diagnosis”) (N= 330,993 ) Sufficient data to conduct follow up analyses: > 1 year of claims data following index AR diagnosis (N=181,933 ) Sufficient data to examine presence of premorbid asthma: > 1 year of claims data prior to index AR diagnosis (N=234,451 ) Pediatric IMAGINE AIRE Study No premorbid asthma: Ptswho had no asthma diagnosis (493.x) > 1 year prior to their index AR diagnosis (N= 117,273 ) No concomitant asthma: Pts who had no asthma diagnosis (493.x) within 1 year (365 days) after their index AR diagnosis (N=102,895) ) No premorbid confounding dx :Ptswho had no “‡‡” > 1 year prior to their index AR diagnosis (N= 114,818 ) No Previous IT: Patients who received no IT> 1 year prior to their index AR diagnosis (N= 102,358 ) B. Remaining pool of patients with AR diagnosed in childhood who had no premorbid or concomitant asthma or counfounding diagnoses, never received IT, and did not receive their 1st asthma diagnosis during pregnancy (N= 100,282 ) 1st De novo IT in childhood: Patients < 18 years at 1st IT (N= 1,960 ) Active Tx in childhood: Patients < 18 years at 2nd IT (N=1,755 ) Had <3 years follow-up data after 2nd IT administration (N=774 ) Had >3 years follow-up data after 2nd IT administration (N=981 ) A. Remaining pool of patients with AR diagnosed in childhood who had no premorbid or concomitant asthma or counfounding diagnoses, received de novo active IT in childhood, and did not receive their 1st asthma diagnosis during pregnancy (N= 981 )
78. Allergy-related Illness AR versus noAR Children P<0.0001 between AR vs noAR Adults P<0.0001 between AR vs noAR From Florida Medicaid 1997-2008 adult and pediatric database not published
79. 54 Allergy-related Illness AR versus no AR in Adults: Asthma, Atopic Dermatitis, Conjunctivitis, Acute Respiratory Infections From Florida Medicaid 1997-2008 adult and pediatric database not published
81. 56 Allergy-related Illness AR versus noAR in Adults: Other diseases of the upper respiratory tract From Florida Medicaid 1997-2008 adult and pediatric database not published
82. 57 Allergy-related Illness AR versus noAR in Adults: Asthma, Atopic Dermatitis, Conjunctivitis, Acute Respiratory Infections From Florida Medicaid 1997-2008 adult and pediatric database not published
83. Conclusions AIT is effective and cost-effective but underutilized Reasons for underutilization are likely multi-factorial with patient factors being significant but payers may begin to restrict access Much more needs to be done to identify, understand, collaborate, learn from, and educate stakeholders and decision-makers Identify constituents Understand gaps that will compellingly support intended value propositions for each constituent Collaborate so that outcomes of efforts are meaningful The role of SIT as “preventive care” may be key Poor adherence (even in the face of extraordinary efficacy) always = failure Several A/I organization sponsored efforts focused on enhancing adherence, and evaluating preventive and cost-efficacy of AIT 58
Much more needs to be done to identify, understand, collaborate, learn from, and educate stakeholders and decision-makersIdentify constituentsUnderstand gaps that will compellingly support intended value propositions for each constituentCollaborate so that outcomes of efforts are meaningfulLearn!!!Then educate… The role of SIT as “Preventive Care” may be key Poor adherence (even the face of extraordinary efficacy) always = failure
Much more needs to be done to identify, understand, collaborate, learn from, and educate stakeholders and decision-makersIdentify constituentsUnderstand gaps that will compellingly support intended value propositions for each constituentCollaborate so that outcomes of efforts are meaningfulLearn!!!Then educate… The role of SIT as “Preventive Care” may be key Poor adherence (even the face of extraordinary efficacy) always = failure
Estimates based on the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-HC) on the use of and expenditures for ambulatory care and prescribed medications to treat allergic rhinitis among the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population. Average annual estimates (in 2005 dollars) for the years 2000 and 2005 are shown by type of service and source of payment. All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better. Total and average reported mean health care expenditures on allergic rhinitis, by ageA total of $6.1 billion (in 2005 dollars) was spent on health care and treatment of allergic rhinitis in 2000 (excluding over-the-counter medications). By 2005, total expenditures to treat allergic rhinitis almost doubled to $11.2 billion (figure 2). CPI-adjusted to 2010. In a grpwing market you don’t think about it so much, because your boat is rising too Might be losing share and don’t know it. Accorind to this your share is flat or declinig. The overall growth of the market is masking that you’re not penetrating this market. Should be 165% not 80% If better and save $, why not a [preferred tx.
Number of reported cases for allergic rhinitis, by sexIn 2005, 7.3 percent of the U.S. population or 22 million persons reported experiencing related symptoms, visiting a physician, or obtaining a prescription drug to treat allergic rhinitis (figure 1). In 2000, the same was reported by 6.3 percent of the population. In both 2000 and 2005, more females reported experiencing allergic rhinitis than males (7.6 percent versus 4.9 percent in 2000 and 8.2 percent versus 6.4 percent in 2005).
The majority of allergic patients are never seen by the allergist . In terms of the ones who are seen the majority are skin testing but only a small minority are prescribed immunotherapy
Inconvenience was the number one barrier to SCIT is this survey of Primary care physician the blue bars and allergists greed bars with needle phobia and cost concerns in a dead heat for 2 nd place
When it comes to immunotherapy prescriptions, the United States is far from a super power. Europe dominates the immunotherapy market with Germany in the lead with 32% of the immunotherapy prescription, followed by the other European companies that ranged from 11 to 15% of the market and the US being buried in the 15% referred to as the rest of the world. The other graph depicts the percentage of immunotherapy sales by company worldwideand you can see there are two major companies ALK and Stallergenes represent ing about 56% of the immunotherapy market and Greer one the largest US manufacturers is buried in the other category