This document discusses infrastructure for ecosystem science in Australia. It begins by outlining the multi-disciplinary nature of ecosystem science and challenges in funding infrastructure to support data collection, storage, analysis and sharing across disciplines. It promotes a collaborative approach through the TERN network to establish shared infrastructure and standards. Examples are given of coordinated data collection, processing, storage and analysis projects enabled by TERN. The document argues that infrastructure like TERN improves the efficiency and effectiveness of ecosystem science in Australia.
Similar to Stuart Phinn_Many kinds of infrastructure: resolving and advancing ecosystem data collection and analysis methods within and between disciplines
Data Management for Postgraduate students by Lynn Woolfreypvhead123
Similar to Stuart Phinn_Many kinds of infrastructure: resolving and advancing ecosystem data collection and analysis methods within and between disciplines (20)
TERN Ecosystem Surveillance Plots Kakadu National Park
Stuart Phinn_Many kinds of infrastructure: resolving and advancing ecosystem data collection and analysis methods within and between disciplines
1. Many Kinds of Infrastructure:
Resolving and Advancing Ecosystem Data
Collection and Analysis Methods Within and
Between Disciplines
By:
Stuart Phinn, Alex Held, Andrew Lowe, Nikki Thurgate, Tim
Clancy, Mike Grundy, Helen Cleugh Mike Liddell, and Eva van
Gorsel
2. Presentation Aim
To demonstrate how shared national research
infrastructure, such as TERN, enables the development
of a consensus on methods and products.
3. Contents
1. The realities of funding and supporting ecosystem science
2. Whose science is it anyway?
3. A framework for cooperation and collaboration
4. Examples of coordinated ecosystem science
4. 1. The realities of funding and supporting
ecosystem science
• The Scope of Ecosystem Science
• Ecosystem Science Infrastructure
• Funding Ecosystem Science Infrastructure
5. • The Scope of Ecosystem Science ?
• Multi-disciplinary and multiple agencies
• Ecological to bio-geophysical
Source: www.fas.org
• Data collection, storage , analysis,
modelling and visualisation
• Science to policy, management
and industry
6. • Ecosystem science research infrastructure
Collection Data Data Policy +
Methods Storage Sharing Modelling Management
Instruments Processing Data Curation Data Analysis
+ Sensors + Analysis + Publishing Searching + Synthesis
7. • Funding Ecosystem Science Infrastructure – Funding Sources
• Australian Government – NCRIS and EIF
• Australian Research Council - Linkage Infrastructure
Collection Data Data Policy +
Methods Storage Sharing Modelling Management
Instruments Processing Data Curation Data Analysis
+ Sensors + Analysis + Publishing Searching + Synthesis
• State Governments
• Agency/Organisation • Australian Research Council
• Professional Societies • Australian Government
• Private Industry Partnerships
• Philanthropic Donations
8. • Funding Ecosystem Science Infrastructure – Funding Sources
• Current competitive funding levels and process for ecosystem
research in Australia are inefficient and un-sustainable for
engaging the ecosystem science communities.
Development of ideas
Compile funding Proposal
Project funded Project not funded
20-30 %
Data processing and analysis
80-70 %
???????
Interpretation of results, specification of findings]
applications applications
Publishing of papers Publishing data
Body of knowledge for
UNDERSTANDING + MANAGING AUSTRALIAN ECOSYSTEMS?
9. 2. Whose science is it anyway?
• Science and Research
• Data to Research to Publication
• Licences – Why and How?
11. • Data to Research to Publication
Development of ideas
Funding
Design of project and data collection-analysis
Data collection
Data processing and analysis
Interpretation of results, specification of findings]
Writing, revision and publishing of paper and data
12. • Licences – Why ?
• To make sure that:
- Data are use for purpose(s) intended
- Data provider is not liable
- Data are cited correctly
0 2500
13. • Licences – How?
• TERN licensing implementation process
• TERN data providers Deed
“ensures that both the data provider and
subsequent users have a clear understanding of
the basis upon which data has been provided, and
upon which TERN and its Facilities can hold, use
and disseminate data.”
14. • Every scientist should be publishing their data?
• What I do is no one else’s business
• I couldn’t be bothered; it’s too much work
• No one reads it anyway
15. 3. A Framework for
cooperation and collaboration
• Ecosystem Science Research Cycle
• Ecosystem Science Activities
(collection, processing, analysis and storage)
• Types and Levels of Cooperation and Collaboration
16. • Ecosystem Science Research Data Cycle
Ecosystem Science
Enhanced ability to
Research output: revise, question and Knowledge gap:
new data and expand knowledge research
publications questions
r
Data analysis,
Proposal and
integration and
planning
synthesis
Storage, Data
preservation and collection, verifica
Enables large scale and
discoverability tion, quality
coordinated data
of data assurance and
collection, sharing and
multiple re-uses control
Data + meta-data,
licensing
17. • Types and Levels of Cooperation and Collaboration
A circle indicates a researcher engaged in the research cycle
TERN –
A collaborative approach to ecosystem establishing
Pre-TERN
networks through shared infrastructure and
Different colours indicated different
data, and new opportunities for collaboration and
fields/specialities. synthesis
18. • Types and Levels of Cooperation and Collaboration
• Methods
• Share data
• Data collection together
• Analysis together
• Meta- analysis
• Workshops
19. 4. Examples of coordinated
ecosystem science
• From TERN 2013 Symposium Abstracts and “TERN Delivers”
• Data Collection
• Data Processing
• Data Storage
• Modelling
• Integration, Analysis and Synthesis
20. • Data Collection
• Selection of appropriate measurements
• Standard protocols for measurement
• Development + assessment of data collection tools
• Apps, open data forms and processing
• Quality assurance and checking
• Crowd sourcing /citizen science
23. • Data Sets
• Database of long term survey sites
• Continental vegetation structure and physiology
• Continental soils and topography
• Continental gas/energy/water fluxes
• Regional vegetation structure and physiology
27. • Data Storage, Discovery and Sharing
• Data submission systems
• Meta-data generation
• Data license selection
• Enabling data submission across multiple disciplines
• Enabling mode effective data search and retrieval
• Whole of portal system development
30. SHaRED
Submission, Harmonisation and Retrieval of Ecological Data
An intuitive, online tool for ecological data submission
Controlled, consistent metadata to describe submitted data
Builds on the existing ÆKOS data framework
Integrates with ÆKOS repository and portal
Enables citation and encourages collaboration
Modelled on the TERN Multi-Scale Plots Network (MSPN)
research community
31. • Monitoring
• Importance of networks for covering spatial and temporal variability
• Identification of trends and changes in desert, forest and grassland
ecosystems
• Improved continental water, and energy flux budgets
• Accurate and extensive continental scale phenology
• Identifying human induced changes
• Evaluation of monitoring programs
32. • Monitoring - Multi-scale Plot Network Book
Title TBA –
…long term ecological monitoring/research and its value
• Section 1 - Introductory Chapters
Ch 2 - Value of Long-term Research & How to Design Effective Ecological Monitoring
Ch 3 – Our Capacity To Tell An Australian Ecological Story
Ch 4 - The Cultural Imperative
• Section 2 – 9 x Ecosystem Data Chapters
Ch’s 5- 13 - Tropical Rainforest to Desert Complex
• Section 3 - Closing Chapter
Ch 14 - The Synopsis
33. • Science – Knowledge Generation
• New understanding of spatial and temporal variability of
desert, forest and savannah ecosystems
• Separation of natural and human induced changes in specific
ecosystems
• How to link long term survey data sets across multiple scales
and observations
• 64 papers for 2011-12
34. • Science – to Management :
Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
• 20 working groups, 13 workshops
• Extinctions + Population Dynamics
• Fire management
• Production landscape management
• Aboriginal bio-cultural knowledge for science
and management
• Linking field to remote and modelled data sets for policy support.
35. • TERN’s impact on ecosystem science and management?
TERN infrastructure use for 2011-2012:
Members of the community > 5000
Newsletters Subscribers 1500
International collaborations 53
Universities involved 17
State and Federal agencies 25
Commercial engagement 3
International Partners 3
Peer reviewed publications - journal articles 64
Conference papers/presentations 112
36. • Examples of increasing efficiency and effectiveness
37. International Partners
TERN is supported by the Australian Government through
the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy
and the Super Science Initiative
Tues 1030 – 1050, 15 min A common challenge for many disciplines in ecosystem science is that a variety of collection and analysis approaches are used to produce similar output information. It is confusing for users of the outputs and funding agencies to determine which method or product is most accurate or suited to their needs. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate how shared national research infrastructure, such as TERN, enables development of consensus on methods and products. Multiple approaches to the same problem, results in duplication of effort, confusion around conclusions, uncertainty on precision and ultimately fragmentation of ecosystem science communities. Separate groups compete for the same funds and the nation has a diminished capacity to act collectively. A semi-independent collaborative framework is required, which is neutral, provides resources to collect and assess data, along with processing and analytical methods, to deliver a consistent approach to methods and validation. This presentation demonstrates how national research infrastructure facilities, such as TERN, provide the framework and solution to this problem. Such a framework is essential to enable a "level playing field" for resolving differences in data, methods and interpretation within disciplines or across jurisdictions. Examples are presented from several of TERN's data collection facilities, showing how competing approaches were assessed and then incorporated to derive consistent approaches which have then been adopted by the relevant communities. The solution has worked within scientific communities, and most importantly across the state - federal government nexus, where perceived duplication of activities can and has caused major problems.A common challenge for many disciplines in ecosystem science is that a variety of collection and analysis approaches are used to produce similar output information. It is confusing for users of the outputs and funding agencies to determine which method or product is most accurate or suited to their needs. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate how shared national research infrastructure, such as TERN, enables development of consensus on methods and products. Multiple approaches to the same problem, results in duplication of effort, confusion around conclusions, uncertainty on precision and ultimately fragmentation of ecosystem science communities. Separate groups compete for the same funds and the nation has a diminished capacity to act collectively. A semi-independent collaborative framework is required, which is neutral, provides resources to collect and assess data, along with processing and analytical methods, to deliver a consistent approach to methods and validation. This presentation demonstrates how national research infrastructure facilities, such as TERN, provide the framework and solution to this problem. Such a framework is essential to enable a "level playing field" for resolving differences in data, methods and interpretation within disciplines or across jurisdictions. Examples are presented from several of TERN's data collection facilities, showing how competing approaches were assessed and then incorporated to derive consistent approaches which have then been adopted by the relevant communities. The solution has worked within scientific communities, and most importantly across the state - federal government nexus, where perceived duplication of activities can and has caused major problems.