The document summarizes the process used to gather input from various stakeholders to develop the school's plan for documenting and using student performance data. First, teachers, administrators, and other school staff provided input through meetings. Surveys were also sent to board members, retired educators, parents and other community members. Anyone who did not respond through other means was contacted directly. After compiling the feedback, drafts of the documentation plan were revised based on input from colleagues within the school and district. The final approved plan focused on disaggregating and using testing data to guide curriculum, instruction, placement in intervention programs, and goal setting with students. Data would also be used to inform professional development and resource allocation decisions.

1. Standard 4 Documenting and Using Results

2. Who was consulted? Classroom teachers Graduation coaches Principals PEY teachers EL teacher

3. Those consulted, part two Board members Retired educators Parents Other stakeholders

4. The Process First, all the teachers at Constantine were tasked with answering the focus questions at their grade level meetings.

5. The Internet helped out Next, emails with the focus questions were sent to others, asking for their input.

6. Even the telephone was used Some concerned parties were contacted by phone and interviewed.

7. Input came from all places When all else failed, we personally visited those whose thoughts we knew we just had to have.

8. We LOVE our consultees!! We couldn't let anyone feel left out, could we?

9. Drafts and Revisions Next came the job of writing and re-writing this section based on feedback from ACS colleagues—those at Constantine, the system-wide SAR Leadership Team members, and the Superintendent.

10. Finished! Finally, we received a stamp of approval!

11. Focus Question #1 Testing data is disaggregated throughout the school-year at all levels (district, school, grade/content area) CIP is written based on disaggregated data Teaching strategies are revised as needed based on data Students are placed in RtI based on performance data

12. Focus Question #2 Standardized test results are sent home during the first six weeks of school; AYP results displayed on marquees, etc. Teachers do an Item Analysis of theme tests and six-weeks tests and discuss results at data meetings RtI pyramids are posted outside classrooms each grading period Students in grades 3-12 have individual goal-setting sessions

13. Focus Question #3 Data drives our instruction Data drives our professional development Data drives our resource needs Data drives our purchases

14. Focus Question #4 Institute and other In-service meetings Professional Development (PDP) Faculty meetings Grade-level meetings District-wide meetings Mentor teachers

15. What we learned “ Anniston City Schools” and “Documenting and Using Results” are synonymous

16. Where we go from here We keep on trucking…looking to the data to lead the way!

17. Let’s continue to Dream in 3 D ! D ream Bigger, D are to be Great, D o the Impossible!