SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Uncertain Volatility with Static Hedge
Abukar Ali
Uncertain Volatility with Static Hedge
We begin with the Black-Scholes equation for pricing a vanilla option contract which is a
parabolic PDE with two variables, S and t and with constant parameters such as r, D, and sigma
(volatility). Instead of pricing the option with constant volatility, this assumption can be relaxed
and we can assume volatility to be parameter that lies within certain range.
Assume that volatility lies within the band
𝜎−
< 𝜎 < 𝜎+
Construct a portfolio consisting of the value of a long call option V(S,t), and hedge it by shorting
-∆ of the underlying asset. The value of the portfolio becomes
Π = 𝑉 − Δ𝑆 and 𝑑𝑠 = 𝑢𝑠𝑑𝑡 + 𝜎𝑆𝑑𝑋
The change in the value of the portfolio is
𝑑Π = (
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑡
+ 0.5𝜎2 𝜕2 𝑉
𝜕2 𝑆
) 𝑑𝑡 + (
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑆
− ∆) 𝑑𝑠, 𝑑Π = (
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑡
+ 0.5𝜎2 𝜕2 𝑉
𝜕2 𝑆
) 𝑑𝑡
Since volatility is unknown, we now assume long vanilla positions to take the lowest value of
the volatility range while short position takes the highest volatility value. The return of the
portfolio is set equal to the risk-free rate.
min
𝜎−<𝜎<𝜎+
(dΠ) = rΠdt
We set
min
𝜎−<𝜎<𝜎+
(
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑡
+ 0.5𝜎2 𝜕2 𝑉
𝜕2 𝑆
) 𝑑𝑡 = (𝑉 − 𝑆
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑆
) 𝑑𝑡
The value that the volatility takes depends sign of Gamma (Γ) and the worst-case value
satisfies1
𝜕𝑉−
𝜕𝑡
+ 0.5𝜎 (Γ)2 𝜕2 𝑉−
𝜕2 𝑆
+ 𝑟𝑆
𝜕𝑉−
𝜕𝑆
− 𝑟𝑉−
= 0 (2.1)
Where
Γ =
𝜕2 𝑉−
𝜕2 𝑆
and
𝜎(Γ) = 𝜎+
𝑖𝑓 Γ < 0
1
Equation 2.1 was originally derived by Avellaneda, Levy & Paras and Lyons. This is also the same as the
Hoggard – Whalley – Wilmott transaction cost model. See P.Wilmott on Quantitative Finance, 2 edition,
Chapter 48.
𝜎(Γ) = 𝜎−
𝑖𝑓 Γ > 0
The worst-case scenario for a delta hedged long vanilla option is if volatility is low while the
opposite is true for a delta hedged short vanilla option.
The best option value, and hence the range of possible values can be found by solving
𝜕𝑉−
𝜕𝑡
+ 0.5𝜎 (Γ)2 𝜕2 𝑉−
𝜕2 𝑆
+ 𝑟𝑆
𝜕𝑉−
𝜕𝑆
− 𝑟𝑉−
= 0 (2.2)
Where
Γ =
𝜕2 𝑉−
𝜕2 𝑆
and
𝜎(Γ) = 𝜎+
𝑖𝑓 Γ < 0
𝜎(Γ) = 𝜎−
𝑖𝑓 Γ > 0
Static Hedging
Unlike delta hedging, static hedging does not require dynamic rebalancing of the hedged
portfolio. For example, suppose we have long position of a digital option which we would like
to hedge. To hedge the position, we can use call spread and discrete hedge the position from
time to time., However, instead of continues rebalancing, we can set up a one time hedge with
the same instrument as above (call spread) but with an optimum number of call spread to use
for the static hedge.
Consider the following example; suppose we want to buy a call option with strike price 𝐾1with
the following payoff:
𝑃 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾1, 0)
To hedge the above call position, we short another call with strike 𝐾2 and a
payoff 𝑃2 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾2, 0). The difference in the payoffs is then
𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑓 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾1) − 𝜆𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾2, 0)
Were 𝜆 is the number of short positions we need to hedge the long call position. This portfolio
is said to be statically hedged and it has smaller payoff then the unhedged call.
To value the residual payoff (Diff) in the uncertain parameter framework, one needs to solve
𝜕𝑉−
𝜕𝑡
+ 0.5𝜎 (Γ)2 𝜕2 𝑉−
𝜕2 𝑆
+ 𝑟𝑆
𝜕𝑉−
𝜕𝑆
− 𝑟𝑉−
= 0
With the final condition
𝑉(𝑆, 𝑇) = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾1) − 𝜆𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾2, 0)
To find the optimum hedge, we solve for the optimum number of calls to short. So, given
market price for the original call, the statically hedged portfolio with the final condition and
with the optimum hedge should produce more tighter spread using the volatility scenario under
the static hedge and uncertain parameter framework.
We initially price up the digital call option and produce its payoff chart at expiry. To hedge the
digital call option we use a portfolio of long and short call options. As stated above, we price
up these options individually and show their payoff at expiry.
Figure 2.1 Digital Call
To hedge the digital call option with strike price of 100, we use initially a short call option with
a quantity of 0.05 and long call position with quantity of 0.05. Assume the calls have market
prices as given in table below
Table 2.1
Option
Type Strike Maturity Bid Ask Quantity
Target Option Digital Call 100 0.5 0 0 1
Hedging Option
1 Call 90 0.5 14.42 14.42 -0.05
Hedging Option
2 Call 110 0.5 4.22 4.22 0.05
The cost of setting up the hedge is
Hedging Cost = -0.05 x 14.42 + 0.05 x 4.22 = -0.51
We solve
𝜕𝑉−
𝜕𝑡
+ 0.5𝜎 (Γ)2
𝜕2
𝑉−
𝜕2 𝑆
+ 𝑟𝑆
𝜕𝑉−
𝜕𝑆
− 𝑟𝑉−
= 0
With the final condition
𝑉(𝑆, 𝑇) = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾1) − 𝜆𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾2, 0)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0
7.2
14.4
21.6
28.8
36
43.2
50.4
57.6
64.8
72
79.2
86.4
93.6
100.8
108
115.2
122.4
129.6
136.8
144
151.2
158.4
165.6
172.8
180
We deduct the result from the cost of setting up the hedge.
We repeat this process but this time we use the opposite scenario for the volatility and we
deduct the result from the cost of setting up the hedge.
The difference from both results should produce tighter price spread then what would have
been quoted for the original unhedged digital call option. To find the optimum number of calls
to sell and buy, we can use solver in excel.
Figure 2.2
Technical Problem.
Due to the copy office package currently running on my PC, the solver is NOT available and
downloading this add-in is also still causing some technical problems. See screen grab below.
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0
8.8
17.6
26.4
35.2
44
52.8
61.6
70.4
79.2
88
96.8
105.6
114.4
123.2
132
140.8
149.6
158.4
167.2
176
184.8
193.6
202.4
211.2
220
References
M. Avellaneda, A. Levy, A. Paras, “Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain
volatilities”, Journal of Applied Finance, Vol 1, 1995
Paul Wilmott, P.Wilmott on Quantitative Finance”, 2nd
Edition, Volume 3, Wiley.
CQF Lecture 2010/2011 – Heath, Jarrow and Morton Model
CQF Lecture 2010/ 2011 - Advanced Volatility Modelling in Complete Markets
P. Wilmott, A. Oztukel, “

More Related Content

What's hot

Ch10 2 v1
Ch10 2 v1Ch10 2 v1
Ch10 2 v1
bhagavanprasad
 
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion I
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion IDynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion I
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion I
Takuya Irie
 
Black scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing conceptBlack scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing concept
Ilya Gikhman
 
Black scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing conceptBlack scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing concept
Ilya Gikhman
 
Black scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing conceptBlack scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing concept
Ilya Gikhman
 
Black scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing conceptBlack scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing concept
Ilya Gikhman
 
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion II
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion IIDynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion II
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion II
Takuya Irie
 
Value of options presentation
Value of options presentationValue of options presentation
Value of options presentation
Trevor Ruwa
 
Quantitative Methods for Counterparty Risk
Quantitative Methods for Counterparty RiskQuantitative Methods for Counterparty Risk
Quantitative Methods for Counterparty Risk
Volatility
 
Basic pricing
Basic pricingBasic pricing
Basic pricing
Ilya Gikhman
 
Alternative option pricing and cva
Alternative option pricing and cvaAlternative option pricing and cva
Alternative option pricing and cva
Ilya Gikhman
 
Basic of pricing 2
Basic of pricing 2Basic of pricing 2
Basic of pricing 2
Ilya Gikhman
 
Ch10 2 v1
Ch10 2 v1Ch10 2 v1
Bond Pricing and CVA
Bond Pricing and CVABond Pricing and CVA
Bond Pricing and CVA
Ilya Gikhman
 
Vidyasagar rocond09
Vidyasagar rocond09Vidyasagar rocond09
Vidyasagar rocond09
Tomasz Waszczyk
 
Options Margin
Options MarginOptions Margin
Options Margin
William Hodge
 
Chapter 30 - Cry
Chapter 30 - CryChapter 30 - Cry
Chapter 30 - Cry
Wayne Jones Jnr
 
Chapter 30
Chapter 30Chapter 30
Chapter 30
Faisal Mehmood
 
Option Probability
Option ProbabilityOption Probability
Option Probability
EricHartford
 

What's hot (19)

Ch10 2 v1
Ch10 2 v1Ch10 2 v1
Ch10 2 v1
 
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion I
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion IDynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion I
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion I
 
Black scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing conceptBlack scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing concept
 
Black scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing conceptBlack scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing concept
 
Black scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing conceptBlack scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing concept
 
Black scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing conceptBlack scholes pricing concept
Black scholes pricing concept
 
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion II
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion IIDynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion II
Dynamic Price Competition and Tacit Collusion II
 
Value of options presentation
Value of options presentationValue of options presentation
Value of options presentation
 
Quantitative Methods for Counterparty Risk
Quantitative Methods for Counterparty RiskQuantitative Methods for Counterparty Risk
Quantitative Methods for Counterparty Risk
 
Basic pricing
Basic pricingBasic pricing
Basic pricing
 
Alternative option pricing and cva
Alternative option pricing and cvaAlternative option pricing and cva
Alternative option pricing and cva
 
Basic of pricing 2
Basic of pricing 2Basic of pricing 2
Basic of pricing 2
 
Ch10 2 v1
Ch10 2 v1Ch10 2 v1
Ch10 2 v1
 
Bond Pricing and CVA
Bond Pricing and CVABond Pricing and CVA
Bond Pricing and CVA
 
Vidyasagar rocond09
Vidyasagar rocond09Vidyasagar rocond09
Vidyasagar rocond09
 
Options Margin
Options MarginOptions Margin
Options Margin
 
Chapter 30 - Cry
Chapter 30 - CryChapter 30 - Cry
Chapter 30 - Cry
 
Chapter 30
Chapter 30Chapter 30
Chapter 30
 
Option Probability
Option ProbabilityOption Probability
Option Probability
 

Similar to static_hedge

Uncertain volatillity Models
Uncertain volatillity ModelsUncertain volatillity Models
Uncertain volatillity Models
Luigi Piva CQF
 
Market Risk Modelling
Market Risk ModellingMarket Risk Modelling
Market Risk Modelling
av vedpuriswar
 
Dynamical smart liquidity on decentralized exchanges for lucrative market making
Dynamical smart liquidity on decentralized exchanges for lucrative market makingDynamical smart liquidity on decentralized exchanges for lucrative market making
Dynamical smart liquidity on decentralized exchanges for lucrative market making
Stefan Duprey
 
Greeks And Volatility
Greeks And VolatilityGreeks And Volatility
Greeks And Volatility
av vedpuriswar
 
PPT - Deep Hedging OF Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learning
PPT - Deep Hedging OF Derivatives Using Reinforcement LearningPPT - Deep Hedging OF Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learning
PPT - Deep Hedging OF Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learning
Jisang Yoon
 
Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and OverviewEstimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
Namrata Das, MBA, FRM
 
Intro to Quant Trading Strategies (Lecture 8 of 10)
Intro to Quant Trading Strategies (Lecture 8 of 10)Intro to Quant Trading Strategies (Lecture 8 of 10)
Intro to Quant Trading Strategies (Lecture 8 of 10)
Adrian Aley
 
blackscholesformula.pdf
blackscholesformula.pdfblackscholesformula.pdf
blackscholesformula.pdf
Hajji17
 
Financial engineering3478
Financial engineering3478Financial engineering3478
Financial engineering3478
artipradhan
 
Exotic Options with Currency-Linked.ppt
Exotic Options with Currency-Linked.pptExotic Options with Currency-Linked.ppt
Exotic Options with Currency-Linked.ppt
Roman351248
 
Portfolio management
Portfolio managementPortfolio management
Portfolio management
Xiaohua Liu
 
VaR_My_Presentation
VaR_My_PresentationVaR_My_Presentation
VaR_My_Presentation
Abukar Ali, CQF
 
Schema anf
Schema anfSchema anf
Schema anf
Bank Industry
 
PORTFOLIO DEFENDER
PORTFOLIO DEFENDERPORTFOLIO DEFENDER
PORTFOLIO DEFENDER
Anuj Gopal
 
Mountain Range Options
Mountain Range OptionsMountain Range Options
Mountain Range Options
Arkus Financial Services
 
Single Resource Revenue Management with Independent Demands.docx
Single Resource Revenue Management with Independent Demands.docxSingle Resource Revenue Management with Independent Demands.docx
Single Resource Revenue Management with Independent Demands.docx
budabrooks46239
 
Prospect Theory.pptx
Prospect Theory.pptxProspect Theory.pptx
Prospect Theory.pptx
DINAMANI BISWAL
 
Black scholas theory for venu(RVSKVK)
Black scholas theory for venu(RVSKVK)Black scholas theory for venu(RVSKVK)
Black scholas theory for venu(RVSKVK)
RVS-KVK Institute of Management Studies
 
Home Work; Chapter 9; Inventory Policy Decisions
Home Work; Chapter 9; Inventory Policy DecisionsHome Work; Chapter 9; Inventory Policy Decisions
Home Work; Chapter 9; Inventory Policy Decisions
Shaheen Sardar
 
F B E559f2 Binomial Pricing
F B E559f2 Binomial  PricingF B E559f2 Binomial  Pricing
F B E559f2 Binomial Pricing
uichong
 

Similar to static_hedge (20)

Uncertain volatillity Models
Uncertain volatillity ModelsUncertain volatillity Models
Uncertain volatillity Models
 
Market Risk Modelling
Market Risk ModellingMarket Risk Modelling
Market Risk Modelling
 
Dynamical smart liquidity on decentralized exchanges for lucrative market making
Dynamical smart liquidity on decentralized exchanges for lucrative market makingDynamical smart liquidity on decentralized exchanges for lucrative market making
Dynamical smart liquidity on decentralized exchanges for lucrative market making
 
Greeks And Volatility
Greeks And VolatilityGreeks And Volatility
Greeks And Volatility
 
PPT - Deep Hedging OF Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learning
PPT - Deep Hedging OF Derivatives Using Reinforcement LearningPPT - Deep Hedging OF Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learning
PPT - Deep Hedging OF Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learning
 
Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and OverviewEstimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
 
Intro to Quant Trading Strategies (Lecture 8 of 10)
Intro to Quant Trading Strategies (Lecture 8 of 10)Intro to Quant Trading Strategies (Lecture 8 of 10)
Intro to Quant Trading Strategies (Lecture 8 of 10)
 
blackscholesformula.pdf
blackscholesformula.pdfblackscholesformula.pdf
blackscholesformula.pdf
 
Financial engineering3478
Financial engineering3478Financial engineering3478
Financial engineering3478
 
Exotic Options with Currency-Linked.ppt
Exotic Options with Currency-Linked.pptExotic Options with Currency-Linked.ppt
Exotic Options with Currency-Linked.ppt
 
Portfolio management
Portfolio managementPortfolio management
Portfolio management
 
VaR_My_Presentation
VaR_My_PresentationVaR_My_Presentation
VaR_My_Presentation
 
Schema anf
Schema anfSchema anf
Schema anf
 
PORTFOLIO DEFENDER
PORTFOLIO DEFENDERPORTFOLIO DEFENDER
PORTFOLIO DEFENDER
 
Mountain Range Options
Mountain Range OptionsMountain Range Options
Mountain Range Options
 
Single Resource Revenue Management with Independent Demands.docx
Single Resource Revenue Management with Independent Demands.docxSingle Resource Revenue Management with Independent Demands.docx
Single Resource Revenue Management with Independent Demands.docx
 
Prospect Theory.pptx
Prospect Theory.pptxProspect Theory.pptx
Prospect Theory.pptx
 
Black scholas theory for venu(RVSKVK)
Black scholas theory for venu(RVSKVK)Black scholas theory for venu(RVSKVK)
Black scholas theory for venu(RVSKVK)
 
Home Work; Chapter 9; Inventory Policy Decisions
Home Work; Chapter 9; Inventory Policy DecisionsHome Work; Chapter 9; Inventory Policy Decisions
Home Work; Chapter 9; Inventory Policy Decisions
 
F B E559f2 Binomial Pricing
F B E559f2 Binomial  PricingF B E559f2 Binomial  Pricing
F B E559f2 Binomial Pricing
 

static_hedge

  • 1. Uncertain Volatility with Static Hedge Abukar Ali
  • 2. Uncertain Volatility with Static Hedge We begin with the Black-Scholes equation for pricing a vanilla option contract which is a parabolic PDE with two variables, S and t and with constant parameters such as r, D, and sigma (volatility). Instead of pricing the option with constant volatility, this assumption can be relaxed and we can assume volatility to be parameter that lies within certain range. Assume that volatility lies within the band 𝜎− < 𝜎 < 𝜎+ Construct a portfolio consisting of the value of a long call option V(S,t), and hedge it by shorting -∆ of the underlying asset. The value of the portfolio becomes Π = 𝑉 − Δ𝑆 and 𝑑𝑠 = 𝑢𝑠𝑑𝑡 + 𝜎𝑆𝑑𝑋 The change in the value of the portfolio is 𝑑Π = ( 𝜕𝑉 𝜕𝑡 + 0.5𝜎2 𝜕2 𝑉 𝜕2 𝑆 ) 𝑑𝑡 + ( 𝜕𝑉 𝜕𝑆 − ∆) 𝑑𝑠, 𝑑Π = ( 𝜕𝑉 𝜕𝑡 + 0.5𝜎2 𝜕2 𝑉 𝜕2 𝑆 ) 𝑑𝑡 Since volatility is unknown, we now assume long vanilla positions to take the lowest value of the volatility range while short position takes the highest volatility value. The return of the portfolio is set equal to the risk-free rate. min 𝜎−<𝜎<𝜎+ (dΠ) = rΠdt We set min 𝜎−<𝜎<𝜎+ ( 𝜕𝑉 𝜕𝑡 + 0.5𝜎2 𝜕2 𝑉 𝜕2 𝑆 ) 𝑑𝑡 = (𝑉 − 𝑆 𝜕𝑉 𝜕𝑆 ) 𝑑𝑡 The value that the volatility takes depends sign of Gamma (Γ) and the worst-case value satisfies1 𝜕𝑉− 𝜕𝑡 + 0.5𝜎 (Γ)2 𝜕2 𝑉− 𝜕2 𝑆 + 𝑟𝑆 𝜕𝑉− 𝜕𝑆 − 𝑟𝑉− = 0 (2.1) Where Γ = 𝜕2 𝑉− 𝜕2 𝑆 and 𝜎(Γ) = 𝜎+ 𝑖𝑓 Γ < 0 1 Equation 2.1 was originally derived by Avellaneda, Levy & Paras and Lyons. This is also the same as the Hoggard – Whalley – Wilmott transaction cost model. See P.Wilmott on Quantitative Finance, 2 edition, Chapter 48.
  • 3. 𝜎(Γ) = 𝜎− 𝑖𝑓 Γ > 0 The worst-case scenario for a delta hedged long vanilla option is if volatility is low while the opposite is true for a delta hedged short vanilla option. The best option value, and hence the range of possible values can be found by solving 𝜕𝑉− 𝜕𝑡 + 0.5𝜎 (Γ)2 𝜕2 𝑉− 𝜕2 𝑆 + 𝑟𝑆 𝜕𝑉− 𝜕𝑆 − 𝑟𝑉− = 0 (2.2) Where Γ = 𝜕2 𝑉− 𝜕2 𝑆 and 𝜎(Γ) = 𝜎+ 𝑖𝑓 Γ < 0 𝜎(Γ) = 𝜎− 𝑖𝑓 Γ > 0 Static Hedging Unlike delta hedging, static hedging does not require dynamic rebalancing of the hedged portfolio. For example, suppose we have long position of a digital option which we would like to hedge. To hedge the position, we can use call spread and discrete hedge the position from time to time., However, instead of continues rebalancing, we can set up a one time hedge with the same instrument as above (call spread) but with an optimum number of call spread to use for the static hedge. Consider the following example; suppose we want to buy a call option with strike price 𝐾1with the following payoff: 𝑃 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾1, 0) To hedge the above call position, we short another call with strike 𝐾2 and a payoff 𝑃2 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾2, 0). The difference in the payoffs is then 𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑓 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾1) − 𝜆𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾2, 0) Were 𝜆 is the number of short positions we need to hedge the long call position. This portfolio is said to be statically hedged and it has smaller payoff then the unhedged call. To value the residual payoff (Diff) in the uncertain parameter framework, one needs to solve 𝜕𝑉− 𝜕𝑡 + 0.5𝜎 (Γ)2 𝜕2 𝑉− 𝜕2 𝑆 + 𝑟𝑆 𝜕𝑉− 𝜕𝑆 − 𝑟𝑉− = 0 With the final condition 𝑉(𝑆, 𝑇) = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾1) − 𝜆𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾2, 0)
  • 4. To find the optimum hedge, we solve for the optimum number of calls to short. So, given market price for the original call, the statically hedged portfolio with the final condition and with the optimum hedge should produce more tighter spread using the volatility scenario under the static hedge and uncertain parameter framework. We initially price up the digital call option and produce its payoff chart at expiry. To hedge the digital call option we use a portfolio of long and short call options. As stated above, we price up these options individually and show their payoff at expiry. Figure 2.1 Digital Call To hedge the digital call option with strike price of 100, we use initially a short call option with a quantity of 0.05 and long call position with quantity of 0.05. Assume the calls have market prices as given in table below Table 2.1 Option Type Strike Maturity Bid Ask Quantity Target Option Digital Call 100 0.5 0 0 1 Hedging Option 1 Call 90 0.5 14.42 14.42 -0.05 Hedging Option 2 Call 110 0.5 4.22 4.22 0.05 The cost of setting up the hedge is Hedging Cost = -0.05 x 14.42 + 0.05 x 4.22 = -0.51 We solve 𝜕𝑉− 𝜕𝑡 + 0.5𝜎 (Γ)2 𝜕2 𝑉− 𝜕2 𝑆 + 𝑟𝑆 𝜕𝑉− 𝜕𝑆 − 𝑟𝑉− = 0 With the final condition 𝑉(𝑆, 𝑇) = 𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾1) − 𝜆𝑀𝑎𝑥(𝑆 − 𝐾2, 0) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0 7.2 14.4 21.6 28.8 36 43.2 50.4 57.6 64.8 72 79.2 86.4 93.6 100.8 108 115.2 122.4 129.6 136.8 144 151.2 158.4 165.6 172.8 180
  • 5. We deduct the result from the cost of setting up the hedge. We repeat this process but this time we use the opposite scenario for the volatility and we deduct the result from the cost of setting up the hedge. The difference from both results should produce tighter price spread then what would have been quoted for the original unhedged digital call option. To find the optimum number of calls to sell and buy, we can use solver in excel. Figure 2.2 Technical Problem. Due to the copy office package currently running on my PC, the solver is NOT available and downloading this add-in is also still causing some technical problems. See screen grab below. -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 8.8 17.6 26.4 35.2 44 52.8 61.6 70.4 79.2 88 96.8 105.6 114.4 123.2 132 140.8 149.6 158.4 167.2 176 184.8 193.6 202.4 211.2 220
  • 6. References M. Avellaneda, A. Levy, A. Paras, “Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain volatilities”, Journal of Applied Finance, Vol 1, 1995 Paul Wilmott, P.Wilmott on Quantitative Finance”, 2nd Edition, Volume 3, Wiley. CQF Lecture 2010/2011 – Heath, Jarrow and Morton Model CQF Lecture 2010/ 2011 - Advanced Volatility Modelling in Complete Markets P. Wilmott, A. Oztukel, “