Social Return on Investment


      Natalie Lynch
Why SROI?
• Increasing recognition that we need better
  ways to account for the social, economic and
  environmental value that results from our
  activities.
• Investors in activities want VfM and this
  includes the social value has been created.
Treasury VfM Definition
   “VfM is defined as the optimum
combination of whole-of-life costs and
 quality (or fitness of purpose) of the
  good or service to meet the user’s
requirement. VfM is not the choice of
goods or services based on the lowest
                cost bid.”

         HM Treasury (2006) Value for money guidance
What is SROI

‘SROI is the application of a set of principles
within a framework that is designed to help
bring about consistency, whilst at the same time
recognising that what is of value will be very
different for different people in different
situations and cultures’
new economics foundation
What is SROI?
• Every day our actions and activities create and
  destroy value.
• The value we create goes beyond what can be
  captured in financial terms.
• SROI is a framework for measuring and
  accounting for a broader concept of value.
• SROI measures change in ways that are
  relevant to the people or organisations that
  experience or contribute to it.
What does SROI do?
• Tells the story of how change is being created
  by measuring social, environmental and
  economic outcomes and uses monetary values
  to represent them.
• A ratio of benefits to costs is calculated
• A ratio of 3:1 indicates that an investment of £1
  delivers £3 of social value.
Types of SROI
• Evaluative, which is conducted retrospectively
  and based on actual outcomes that have
  already taken place.
• Forecast, which predicts how much social
  value will be created if the activities meet
  their intended outcomes.
Measuring Change
(Distance Travelled)
Developing a theory of change

     Inputs        Activities     Outputs       Outcomes




Output: Tells you an activity has taken place and is
usually quantitative (e.g. Number of people trained).

Outcome: The change that occurs as a result of an
activity (improved wellbeing of training participants).
Context to the Intervention
  These are the wider economic, social, environmental, and policy conditions. This is very important – many logic models
   suggest that interventions take place in a vacuum, failing to take account of the way these factors have an influence.

                                                    Rationale for Intervention
    This is the justification for the selected intervention, e.g.: what is the nature and scale of the specific problem being
                addressed? What will happen if we ‘do nothing’? Why this intervention and not alternatives?



       Inputs              Activities & Outputs            Short-term                Medium-term                 Long-term
    These are the          These are the things            Outcomes                    Outcomes                   Impacts
resources available to     that an intervention        It is often useful to         Medium-term           This is the final, high-
     deliver the            does, e.g. provide        distinguish between            outcomes are             level effect of the
    intervention.          workshops, practical       short- and medium-        changes in behaviour         intervention – e.g.
                           support, training etc.        term outcomes.           or condition – e.g.           ‘Improved life
This may be in terms
                                                                                     ‘beneficiaries        expectancy, reduced
   of specific cash             Outputs are          Short-term outcomes
                                                                                   increase levels of       health inequalities’.
 funding or ‘in-kind’           quantitative            can be defined as
                                                                                    physical activity’
   contributions.            measures of this        changes in knowledge                                  This relates closely to
                           activity, e.g. No.s of:   / awareness / attitude        In describing any       the original rationale
     It is relatively                                                            outcomes, language
straightforward to put        • Beneficiaries          – e.g. ‘beneficiaries                                 for intervention.
                          •Materials distributed       have an increased          suggesting change
 a monetary value on                                                            (‘increased, reduced’)     Impacts are subject to
    inputs and, in a          • Sessions held            awareness of ...’
                                                                                                            a very wide range of
                                                                                       is useful.
  framework of costs         Evaluation at this        This is based on a                                     other contextual
                                                        simple model of            Evaluation here is
 and benefits, inputs         level concerns                                                                   influences (e.g.
                                                           behavioral            about effectiveness.
     are the costs.        implementation and                                                              combinations of other
                                                         change, which              The relationship
  Evaluation at this          efficiency (the                                                              policies, programmes,
                                                      suggests that these        between inputs and
    level is about        relationships between                                                                    economic
                                                       changes precede          outcomes is the basis
  economy and the          inputs and outputs).                                                             conditions), - shown
                                                     changes in behaviour       for cost-effectiveness
resources consumed.                                                                                              by the very
                                                          or condition.         / cost-benefit studies.
                                                                                                               permeable line
Example
Stakeholder    Input   Activity              Output                  Outcome

Participants   Time    Trained in computer   Number of hrs           Increased self
                       recycling             engaged                 confidence
                                             Level of IT skills      Sustainable
                                                                     employment
Participants   Time    Encourage family      Number of hours         Better family life
families               member                family member is        Increased income
                                             engaged                 for family
Local          N/A     N/A                   No of computers         Reduced landfill
government                                   recycled and diverted   expenditure
                                             from landfill
The            N/A     N/A                   Carbon dioxide          Contribution
environment                                  emissions               towards climate
                                                                     change
State          N/A     N/A                   Reduction ins health    Less usage of NHS
                                             services used           care
                                                                     Less expenditure
                                                                     on benefits
Evidencing outcomes
• SROI evaluates material outcomes for all
  stakeholders and not just outputs or those
  outcomes that are easy to measure.
• Find out what is important, then seek to
  measure it (this involves engaging
  stakeholders).

Key question: “how do we know that change
has taken place?”
Evidencing outcomes
• Select ‘ways of knowing’ that an outcome (a
  change) has taken place = indicators

  Stakeholder            Outcomes           Indicators
  Long term unemployed   Person (A) finds   (A) Accepts a job offer
  person                 sustainable and    (A) Stays in
                         meaningful             employment for at
                         employment             least 6 months
                                            (A) Self reports on job
                                                satisfaction
Evidencing Outcomes

• Objective indicators    e.g. No. occurrences of staff
                          sick leave


• Subjective indicators   e.g. Self reporting physical
                          health


• Direct measurement      e.g. Cost saving
The stages of SROI

1. Establishing scope and identifying key
   stakeholders
2. Mapping outcomes (shows relationships
   between inputs, outputs and outcomes)
3. Evidencing outcomes and giving them a value
4. Establishing impact
5. Calculating the SROI
6. Reporting, using and embedding
SROI can help improve services by:
• Facilitating strategic discussions and helping you understand
  and maximise the social value an activity creates
• Helping you target appropriate resources
• Demonstrating the importance of working people and
  organisations that have a contribution to make in creating
  change
• Creating a formal dialogue with stakeholders that enables
  them to hold the service to account and involves them
  meaningfully in service design.
• Identifying common ground between what organisation wants
  to achieve and what stakeholders want to achieve
SROI can improve sustainability by:

• raising our profile;
• improving our case for further funding;
• making our tenders more persuasive.
Questions for Settlement?
• Forecast or evaluative SROI?
• How are we doing gathering output, outcomes,
  and impact data?
• In house or external support for SROI?
• If in house who would be involved?
• Are their sufficient resources for in house SROI?
• Skills needed for SROI: accounts, finance,
  evaluation & stakeholder involvement

Sroi

  • 1.
    Social Return onInvestment Natalie Lynch
  • 2.
    Why SROI? • Increasingrecognition that we need better ways to account for the social, economic and environmental value that results from our activities. • Investors in activities want VfM and this includes the social value has been created.
  • 3.
    Treasury VfM Definition “VfM is defined as the optimum combination of whole-of-life costs and quality (or fitness of purpose) of the good or service to meet the user’s requirement. VfM is not the choice of goods or services based on the lowest cost bid.” HM Treasury (2006) Value for money guidance
  • 4.
    What is SROI ‘SROIis the application of a set of principles within a framework that is designed to help bring about consistency, whilst at the same time recognising that what is of value will be very different for different people in different situations and cultures’ new economics foundation
  • 5.
    What is SROI? •Every day our actions and activities create and destroy value. • The value we create goes beyond what can be captured in financial terms. • SROI is a framework for measuring and accounting for a broader concept of value. • SROI measures change in ways that are relevant to the people or organisations that experience or contribute to it.
  • 6.
    What does SROIdo? • Tells the story of how change is being created by measuring social, environmental and economic outcomes and uses monetary values to represent them. • A ratio of benefits to costs is calculated • A ratio of 3:1 indicates that an investment of £1 delivers £3 of social value.
  • 7.
    Types of SROI •Evaluative, which is conducted retrospectively and based on actual outcomes that have already taken place. • Forecast, which predicts how much social value will be created if the activities meet their intended outcomes.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Developing a theoryof change Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Output: Tells you an activity has taken place and is usually quantitative (e.g. Number of people trained). Outcome: The change that occurs as a result of an activity (improved wellbeing of training participants).
  • 10.
    Context to theIntervention These are the wider economic, social, environmental, and policy conditions. This is very important – many logic models suggest that interventions take place in a vacuum, failing to take account of the way these factors have an influence. Rationale for Intervention This is the justification for the selected intervention, e.g.: what is the nature and scale of the specific problem being addressed? What will happen if we ‘do nothing’? Why this intervention and not alternatives? Inputs Activities & Outputs Short-term Medium-term Long-term These are the These are the things Outcomes Outcomes Impacts resources available to that an intervention It is often useful to Medium-term This is the final, high- deliver the does, e.g. provide distinguish between outcomes are level effect of the intervention. workshops, practical short- and medium- changes in behaviour intervention – e.g. support, training etc. term outcomes. or condition – e.g. ‘Improved life This may be in terms ‘beneficiaries expectancy, reduced of specific cash Outputs are Short-term outcomes increase levels of health inequalities’. funding or ‘in-kind’ quantitative can be defined as physical activity’ contributions. measures of this changes in knowledge This relates closely to activity, e.g. No.s of: / awareness / attitude In describing any the original rationale It is relatively outcomes, language straightforward to put • Beneficiaries – e.g. ‘beneficiaries for intervention. •Materials distributed have an increased suggesting change a monetary value on (‘increased, reduced’) Impacts are subject to inputs and, in a • Sessions held awareness of ...’ a very wide range of is useful. framework of costs Evaluation at this This is based on a other contextual simple model of Evaluation here is and benefits, inputs level concerns influences (e.g. behavioral about effectiveness. are the costs. implementation and combinations of other change, which The relationship Evaluation at this efficiency (the policies, programmes, suggests that these between inputs and level is about relationships between economic changes precede outcomes is the basis economy and the inputs and outputs). conditions), - shown changes in behaviour for cost-effectiveness resources consumed. by the very or condition. / cost-benefit studies. permeable line
  • 11.
    Example Stakeholder Input Activity Output Outcome Participants Time Trained in computer Number of hrs Increased self recycling engaged confidence Level of IT skills Sustainable employment Participants Time Encourage family Number of hours Better family life families member family member is Increased income engaged for family Local N/A N/A No of computers Reduced landfill government recycled and diverted expenditure from landfill The N/A N/A Carbon dioxide Contribution environment emissions towards climate change State N/A N/A Reduction ins health Less usage of NHS services used care Less expenditure on benefits
  • 12.
    Evidencing outcomes • SROIevaluates material outcomes for all stakeholders and not just outputs or those outcomes that are easy to measure. • Find out what is important, then seek to measure it (this involves engaging stakeholders). Key question: “how do we know that change has taken place?”
  • 13.
    Evidencing outcomes • Select‘ways of knowing’ that an outcome (a change) has taken place = indicators Stakeholder Outcomes Indicators Long term unemployed Person (A) finds (A) Accepts a job offer person sustainable and (A) Stays in meaningful employment for at employment least 6 months (A) Self reports on job satisfaction
  • 14.
    Evidencing Outcomes • Objectiveindicators e.g. No. occurrences of staff sick leave • Subjective indicators e.g. Self reporting physical health • Direct measurement e.g. Cost saving
  • 15.
    The stages ofSROI 1. Establishing scope and identifying key stakeholders 2. Mapping outcomes (shows relationships between inputs, outputs and outcomes) 3. Evidencing outcomes and giving them a value 4. Establishing impact 5. Calculating the SROI 6. Reporting, using and embedding
  • 16.
    SROI can helpimprove services by: • Facilitating strategic discussions and helping you understand and maximise the social value an activity creates • Helping you target appropriate resources • Demonstrating the importance of working people and organisations that have a contribution to make in creating change • Creating a formal dialogue with stakeholders that enables them to hold the service to account and involves them meaningfully in service design. • Identifying common ground between what organisation wants to achieve and what stakeholders want to achieve
  • 17.
    SROI can improvesustainability by: • raising our profile; • improving our case for further funding; • making our tenders more persuasive.
  • 18.
    Questions for Settlement? •Forecast or evaluative SROI? • How are we doing gathering output, outcomes, and impact data? • In house or external support for SROI? • If in house who would be involved? • Are their sufficient resources for in house SROI? • Skills needed for SROI: accounts, finance, evaluation & stakeholder involvement