Download to read offline
Uploaded byTimothy Maciag
SpiCE for Knowledge Management - PDF version
Timothy Maciag presented his doctoral defense on his work developing SpiCE (Spime + Culture of Participation + Ethical Decision-making) for knowledge management. SpiCE aims to provide a more sustainable blueprint for knowledge management by focusing on people, technology, and process. Maciag demonstrated SpiCE through an Egg SpiCE case study on food sustainability which engaged local participants using narratives, surveys and a technology platform. Future work will include further analysis of SpiCE implementations and its potential for life-long learning.
SpiCE for Knowledge Management - PDF version
- 1. SpiCE for KnowledgeManagement Timothy Maciag Doctoral Defense | April 14, 2016 | RICE lab, 9:00am Department of Computer Science | University of Regina
- 2. Introduction • Context/KM aroundthe room • Motivations • SpiCE • Spime + Culture of Participation + Ethical Decision-making • Egg SpiCE • Conclusions & current/future work • Acknowledgements
- 3. It’s all aboutthis crazy thing called Knowledge “Management”
- 4. It’s all aboutthis crazy thing called Knowledge “Management” Decision-making
- 5. It’s all aboutthis crazy thing called Knowledge “Management” Decision-making
- 6. It’s all aboutthis crazy thing called Knowledge “Management” Decision-making Ethics
- 7. It’s all aboutthis crazy thing called Knowledge “Management” Decision-making Education Learning Ethics
- 8. It’s all aboutthis crazy thing called Knowledge “Management” Data Information Decision-making Education Learning Ethics
- 9. It’s all aboutthis crazy thing called Knowledge “Management” Data Information Mining search & scent Decision-making Education Learning Ethics
- 10. Motivation • KM hasbeen around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*) • Has it been a success? (*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879 http://gapingvoid.com/blog/2007/08/20/complicated/
- 11. Motivation • KM hasbeen around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*) • Has it been a success? • Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided? (*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
- 12. Motivation • KM hasbeen around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*) • Has it been a success? • Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided? • SECI (*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
- 13. Motivation • KM hasbeen around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*) • Has it been a success? • Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided? • SECI • Cynefin (*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
- 14. Motivation • KM hasbeen around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*) • Has it been a success? • Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided? • SECI • Cynefin • KCS (*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879 http://library.serviceinnovation.org/KCS_Practices_Guide/030/030
- 15. Motivation • KM hasbeen around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*) • Has it been a success? • Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided? • SECI • Cynefin • KCS • CoP (*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879 http://kpopkollective.com/2013/10/31/communities-of-practice-in-digital-humanities/
- 16. Motivation • KM hasbeen around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*) • Has it been a success? • Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided? • SECI • Cynefin • KCS • CoP • SER (*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
- 17. Motivation • KM hasbeen around as a thing for 40 or so odd years (*) • Has it been a success? • Good frameworks for KM exist, but can a more sustainable blueprint be provided? • SECI • Cynefin • KCS • CoP • SER • OT/MOOC – finally a hint of what it could be! (*) Lambe, Prusak, and Snowden (2008): https://vimeo.com/86950879
- 18. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis
- 19. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis https://lasindias.com/el-largo-camino-hacia-la-ciudad-etiquetada
- 20. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis
- 21. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis
- 22. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis http://john.do/discovering-you/
- 23. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis https://unikeyword.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/prosumer/
- 24. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis https://thedailyomnivore.net/2012/04/11/
- 25. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis http://ictevangelist.com/why-i-love-gapingvoid-conversation-on-educationux/
- 26. SpiCE • Spime wrangling •Culture of participation • Ethical decision-making/praxis http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-praxis.htm
- 27. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations
- 28. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations
- 29. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations FSF/Stallman SpiCE The freedom to run a program for any purpose The freedom to openly cross-culturally learn and create knowledge without boundary The freedom to study how a program works and adapt it to specific needs The freedom to openly learn and reflect upon created knowledge for decision-making The freedom to redistribute copies of the original software code and working program(s) The freedom to collect, capture, and share unfiltered and unbiased structured data for knowledge creation The freedom to (re)distribute copies of modified (adapted) versions of the software code and working program(s) The freedom to interact with others to share and evolve knowledge and experiences to form habits that are sustaining, or that can enable praxis
- 30. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations http://gapingvoid.com/blog/2007/04/09/the-network/
- 31. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations
- 32. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations http://sci2s.ugr.es/dicits/index.php?p=software
- 33. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations http://gerardnico.com/wiki/data_mining/association
- 34. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations
- 35. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations
- 36. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations Respect for Mepham TTL Imp Stakeholder Autonomy Fairness Well-being Social (people) Economic (profit) Environment (planet) … TTL = Triple Top Line | Imp = Implications
- 37. People, Technology, Process Ideas& “Remixed” Innovations
- 38. Egg SpiCE • Foodsustainability http://www.sustainablecitiesinstitute.org/topics/food-systems
- 39. Egg SpiCE • Foodsustainability • Building knowledge through narratives and surveys • 21 local participants with a variety of background http://www.storycoloredglasses.com/p/participatory-narrative-inquiry.html
- 40. Egg SpiCE • Foodsustainability • Building knowledge through narratives and surveys • 21 local participants with a variety of background • Egg SpiCE configuration • Starting with the idea of SOLE food Stakeholders Producers Consumers Animals Plants Land
- 41. Egg SpiCE • Foodsustainability • Building knowledge through narratives and surveys • 21 local participants with a variety of background • Egg SpiCE configuration • Starting with the idea of SOLE food Respect for Mepham TTL Implication Consumers Fairness: affordable food Economic Good price Social Availability of quality selections … … … … Animals Autonomy: Behavioral freedom Social Free range, maximum space … … … …
- 42. Egg SpiCE • Foodsustainability • Building knowledge through narratives and surveys • 21 local participants with a variety of background • Egg SpiCE configuration • Starting with the idea of SOLE food
- 43. Egg SpiCE • Foodsustainability • Building knowledge through narratives and surveys • 21 local participants with a variety of background • Egg SpiCE configuration • Starting with the idea of SOLE food
- 44. Egg SpiCE • Foodsustainability • Building knowledge through narratives and surveys • 21 local participants with a variety of background • Egg SpiCE configuration • Starting with the idea of SOLE food • Technology design • Live demo: http://spice.cs.uregina.ca/ http://spice.cs.uregina.ca/
- 45. Egg SpiCE • Foodsustainability • Building knowledge through narratives and surveys • 21 local participants with a variety of background • Egg SpiCE configuration • Starting with the idea of SOLE food • Technology design • Live demo: http://spice.cs.uregina.ca/ • Follow-up/usability/utility study http://vedhamanikandan.blogspot.ca/2012/06/user-experience-in-mobility.html
- 46. Conclusion, current &future work • Context: • Lots of good frameworks for KM • Still the struggle in finding sustainable solutions
- 47. Conclusion, current &future work • Context: • Lots of good frameworks for KM • Still the struggle in finding sustainable solutions • Motivation: • Frameworks can be “remixed” to provide better blueprint for sustained KM success • Focus on people, technology, process key
- 48. Conclusion, current &future work • Context: • Lots of good frameworks for KM • Still the struggle in finding sustainable solutions • Motivation: • Frameworks can be “remixed” to provide better blueprint for sustained KM success • Focus on people, technology, process key • SpiCE: • Successful in engaging interest • Deeper analysis is required for Egg SpiCE/Food SpiCE • SpiCE at eHealth > Quite successful
- 49. Conclusion, current &future work • Context: • Lots of good frameworks for KM • Still the struggle in finding sustainable solutions • Motivation: • Frameworks can be “remixed” to provide better blueprint for sustained KM success • Focus on people, technology, process key • SpiCE: • Successful in engaging interest • Deeper analysis is required for Egg SpiCE/Food SpiCE • SpiCE at eHealth > Quite successful • Future work: • Full implementation, analysis of social computing/KM engagement, and analysis of SpiCE for life-long learning
- 50. Acknowledgements & Q/A •My wife and family: Nova Scheidt, Anna and Joe Maciag, Joey, Krista (Alex), and Tess (Geoff, Harry, Ollie, and Ella) Park-Maciag, Ajay and Kim Fahlman • My supervisor: Daryl Hepting • My committee/chair: Katherine Arbuthnott, JoAnn Jaffe, Howard Hamilton, Bob Hilderman, Dominik Slezak, Lisa Watson, Marjorie Delbaere, Paul Laforge • My office mates: Richard Spring and Sean Targett • My work mates: Jacky Hoffert, Cindy Ikola-Gellner, Shannon Waugh, Murray Webb, Ron Burnell, Kirsty Jewsbury, James Anderson, Norine Janzen, Tina Neudorf, Margo Brown, Danica Navarro, Adam Chomos, Sarah Wynn, Brenton Wilson, Chris Zimmer • Others: Harvey Hill, Jim Wright (Nature’s Best), Andy Knoll (Body Fuel Organics), Rick Morrell (Eat Healthy Foods), The Pusch Brothers, Janeen Covlin, all of my study participants