The document discusses recommendations to improve Macedonia's business climate and competitiveness. It finds that while Macedonia has made progress in assessments of ease of doing business, the quality of regulation is comparatively low. General regulation takes much of companies' time and they complain about frequent legislative changes. Key recommendations include improving regulation quality, implementing a "think small first" approach, abolishing non-deductible expenses, and preparing an analysis of tax regulation's impact on different sized companies. Corruption also poses an obstacle to businesses according to surveyed companies. Strengthening rule of law and the fight against corruption are emphasized. Access to external finance is limited, with most firms relying on self-financing. Improving access to credit for small

1. BUSINESS PRIORITIES
FOR FASTER
GROWTH
Organization of
Employers of
Macedonia

2. P r e face
The Republicof Macedonia may beacountrywith a
small market,but despite this constraint,by
implementingarangeof measuresandpolicies, it
canimprovethe competitivenessof its economy
andbecomeacountrywheredoing businessis
morecost-effectiveandlifeis better asaresult.
Therearemultiple andcomplexfactorsthat affect
competitiveness; thebusinessclimatecan be
improvedandacompetitive Macedonianeconomy
created only with the joint effort of all
stakeholders, including the government, the
businesssector and civil society.
Inrecent years Macedonia hasmadesignificant
progressin termsof improving its business
climate, which hasbeenacknowledgedin
studies commissioned by theWorldBank,
theWorldEconomicF
orum, the International
Monetary Fundandthe InternationalLabour
Organization(ILO).However,enhancingthe
businessclimateisacontinuousprocessthat
requiresregularimprovement andadvancement.
T
othat end, the Organizationof Employersof
Macedonia andthe Business Confederation of
Macedonia, with the support of the ILOandwith
theprofessional assistanceof the Macedonian
Centerfor International Cooperation and
M-prospect, implementedresearchon thetheme
of anImprovedBusiness Climatefor Sustainable
Enterprises,aimed at identifying keyareasthat
constrainthe businessclimatein Macedonia and
proposingrecommendations for its improvement.
Recommendationssuchasimproving the legal
andregulatoryenvironment by increasingthe
time available for consultationswith the business
community,strengtheningthe roleof theEconomicSocial Council, andgiving alonger period for
companies to adjust to newandamendedlabour
regulations areall aspects that arecrucial to an
efficient market economythat should serveasa
creatorof newemployment, andagenerator of
economic growth, improvedliving standardsand
overall progress.
companies andthoseyet to beestablished, and
for both domestic investorsandforeigndirect
investments.The merepassing of laws and
amendments isnot sufficient to createamore
stablebusinessenvironment; in thefuture,we need
to work harder onthe implementationof
laws, judicial reformsandthepreventionof
corruption.
The growth of Macedoniancompanies still depends
onself-financingandbank loans. Thismeansthat
highinterestrateshaveto beaddressed,andeasier
accessto financialservices for small andmedium
enterpriseshasto beprovided.
The gapbetween the economy‟sdemands and
thesupply of qualified labour is still anissue. Links
between vocational schools andenterprisesneed
to beimproved. Further,trainingand re-training
should beencouraged for unemployed people, to
improvetheir professional development and their
accessto employment.
Despitethe fact that Macedonia isoneof the
countriesin theregion that offersthebest
conditionsfor businessstart-ups,strongerfinancial
support for theimplementationof theProgramme
for theDevelopment of
Entrepreneurship, CompetitivenessandInnovation
for Small and MediumEnterprises is required.
Webelieve that the recommendations made in this
document will be of benefit to policy-makers, social
partners,businessassociationsand civil society
in their effortsto createabusinessclimatethat will
improvethecompetitivenessandsuccessof
domesticcompanies,both in domestic and foreign
markets.
Organization of
Employersof
Macedonia
Business
Confederation of
Macedonia
President
Angel Dimitrov
President
Mile Boskov
The ruleof law andsecureproperty rightsare
essential for the creationof apredictable, stable
andsafeenvironment, both for currentlyexisting
3

3. COMPANIES DESERVE QUALITY
REGULA
TION AND ITS FAIR
IMPLEMENTATION
Macedonia
has achieved
considerable
progressin assessmentof the ease of doing
business in the country,being ranked23rd out of
185economiesin 2012 by the World Bank‟s Doing
Business (DB)report. However, the quality of the
regulatoryenvironment iscomparativelylow,as
assessed by the World Bank‟s RegulatoryQuality
Index.
Figure 1.1.
General regulation as a constraint
and burden to companies
36,5
T
able 1.1.
Rankingfor ease of doing business
Country
95,9
Frequentlegislative changesare major issue
2011
22
23
Ireland
16
35
35
Bulgaria
64
66
Croatia
80
84
Serbia
95
86
95,3
15
Slovenia
37,1
2012
Macedonia
Source:World Bank,Doing Business,databank
According to the primary research data,
Employers‟ Survey (2013),general regulation in
Macedoniapresents a burden to companies:a
large majority of respondents (over 80%)agree
that conforming to general regulation takes
much of their firm‟s time. Companies mainly
complain about frequent legislative changes, and
observethat regulations serve the purpose of
filling state coffers.
Frequentlegislative changesconstrain long-term planning
48,8
Rigorouspenalty provision
48,8
BUSINESSPRIORITIESFO A TE R W H
RF S RG O T
91,2
Businesscommunity should participate in preparation of
legislation
20,0
88,2
Timespentondealingwith regulation
29,4
Regulationsfor budgetrevenues
Source:Employers‟ Survey 2013
4
92,4
81,1

4. T
able 1.2.
The 5 most burdensome aspects
of the labour legislation
Aswell as ease of the entry into the
market, market efficiency depends on ease
of exit. In Doing Business 2013,Macedonia is
ranked
60th for ease of exit from the market,with the
ranking having improved only recently.The
most important reason for closing a business
in Macedonia is non-profitability,followed
by problems in getting finance. However, the
primary research showed that the majority
of companies(54.1%)have confidence in the
bankruptcylegislation and its implementation.
TheGlobalCompetitivenessIndex (GCI)ranks
Macedonia in 94th position for labour market
efficiency.This modest ranking is mainly due to
the areas of “cooperation in labour-employer
relations” and “redundancy costs”.
TheEmployers‟ Survey has shown that, in
general, firms have positive views on labour
legislation. Companies areleast satisfied with
the short timeperiod requiredfor adoption and
application of new legislation.
T
able 1.2presentsthe five most important
aspects of current labour legislation that are
seen as mostly non-conducive to businesses.
Key recommendat i o n s
Improvethe quality of regulation,by
increasingthe time available for consultations
with the business community;
` Implement the „thinksmallfirst‟ approach
at all levels of government and all stages of
policy-making;
` Abolishnon-deductible expensesto help
the profit law become profit-sensitive;
Aspects of the
labour legislation
Termination of
employment
contract
Official holidays
% of firms
respond- ing that
the partic- ular
aspect is major
burden
13.2%
Source: Employers‟ Survey
2013
In the period from2006 onwards, several tax
reformswere implemented in Macedonia, which
reducedthe overall tax burden (bothin terms
of costs and administration) on Macedonian
companies. International comparisons show that
Macedonian companiespay relatively low taxes.
Still, the majorityof surveyed companies (80%)
agreethat the tax burden is amajor investment
constraint.Theymainly complainabout the
averagetime neededto comply with tax laws and
the percentageof turnover takenby payroll taxes.
In addition,morethan half of the respondents
object that taxes areprofit-insensitive, meaning
that they have to pay taxes regardlessof
whether their firm is making profits or not.
11.1%
Legislation on types
of employment
contracts
Overtime work
10.0%
Recruitment
7.9%
Dismissals
7.9%
9.5%
F most firms (45%)health and safety regulation
or
also presentsa financial burden.
TheEmployers‟ Survey showed that morethan
one third of companieshave never had an
experiencewhere interferenceby inspectorates
has negatively affectedtheir operations.
Still, about 11%of firms complain that they often
experiencesuch problems.Moreover,about
44%of respondents think that inspections by
the State Labour Inspectorate arepolitically
motivated (26.5%of respondents believe this is
the case occasionally, while 17.1%state that this
is often the case).
`
`
`
`
`
`
Preparea detailed analysis of the impact of
tax regulation on companiesdifferentiated
bysize.This will show if adjustments are
needed in the taxation system for micro and
small firms;
Implement a selective reduction of the rates
of social contributions, or adjust the minimum
base for payment of social contributions with
the minimum wage;
Establish a quickbankruptcy procedure;
Givemoretime for companiesto comply
with new or amended labour laws, with
strong informative campaigns beforemajor
legislative changes;
F
orm a committee within the EconomicSocial Council (E C
S )that will continuously and
randomly check files and reports of labour
inspections and oversee if their workisfair
or politically motivated,and publish their
reports.
5

5. STRONG RULE
OF LAW TOUGH
,
FIGHT AGAINST
CORRUPTION
is however assessed as good in Macedonia, with
the country ranked17th.
In the Employers‟ Survey,Macedonian businesses
show a moderate positive assessmentof the
legal framework for protecting property rights
and the state of the rule of law. However, most
respondents believe that thereis not equal
treatment for all companies.
The rule of law and secure property rights create
a more predictable, stable and safe environment
in which companiescan be established and grow.
WorldBankdata, presentedin T
able2.1,showthat
Macedonia ischaracterised by arelativelylowrule
of law,at thebottom of theranking, comparedwith
thecomparator countries, with the exceptionof
Serbia.
Figure 2.1.
Threats to property rights
T
able 2.1.
Rule of Law Index, 2011
48.4
Governan
ce
score
(-2.5 to
+2.5)
-0.25
Ireland
95.8
1.76
Slovenia
83.6
1.07
Bulgaria
60.6
0.18
Croatia
51.6
-0.09
Serbia
46.5
-0.33
Country
Percentil
e rank
(0-100)
Macedonia
Source:World Bank,GovernanceMatters
In terms of the transparency of policy-making,
Macedonia is ranked76th,as assessed in the
World Economic F
orum‟s GlobalCompetitive
Index (GCI).In cases of disputes, companies
in Macedonia generally have to spend many
resources,including time, to settle a dispute; this
is related to the inefficient legal framework.
Secureproperty rights areimportant in any
investment decision of companies,whether for
start-ups or growing firms. Data fromthe C I
G
show that Macedonia does not provide a high
security of property rights, the country being
ranked84th.Thestrength of investor protection
6
Most respondents in the E
S(81.4%)also share the
view that propertyrights are protected and
secure.Still, 39%of surveyed companies state
that many firms have experienced some threat
to their property rights. Alarge number of
respondents (74.6%)agreewith the statement
that threats to the integrity of property rights
have made companiespostpone investment
decisions(seeFigure 2.1).
BUSINESSPRIORITIESFO A TE R W H
RF S RG O T
4,7
No,nonehave
Somehave
Mosthave
Allhave
DK/NA
Source:Employers‟
Survey 2013: Answers
to the question “In
your view, have many
firms experienced
recent threats to their
property rights?”
Note: D means “don‟t
K
know; NAmeans “does
not apply”

6. Corruption is a threat to society and the economy.
Data fromTransparency International, presented
in T
able 2.2,show that Macedonia was ranked69th
out of 176 countries in 2012 in terms of
perceptions of the existence of corruption.
Political parties and the judiciary areperceived as
the most corrupt institutions in Macedonia.
T
able 2.2.
Corruption Perception Index, 2012
Country
Score
Macedonia
Rankin
g
2012
69
43
Rankin
g
2011
69
Ireland
25
69
19
Slovenia
37
61
35
Bulgaria
62
46
66
Croatia
75
41
86
Serbia
80
39
86
Source:Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions
Index,2012
Key recommendat i o n s
`
`
Note:Thescore runs from 0to 100,with a lower score
indicating lesscorruption
`
Figure 2.2.
Level of corruption
`
`
No,not at all
Somehave
Somewhat
Institute regular reporting by each
inspectionbodyon inspections performed,
industries covered,regions,etc., with reports
published on a website each quarter;
Makeall public institutionscarryout analyses
in thoseareasof their operation that havehigh
potential to lead to corruption,andproposepreemptivemeasuresfor avoidingcorruption;
Publisha PublicProcurement bulletin to
provide the public with a comprehensive,
organisedand structuredsourceof public
procurement information;
Introduce quarterly thematic sessions of
the Economic Social Council focused on the
fight against the greyeconomy;
Strengthen internal and external financial
control mechanisms in order to prevent or
penalise misuse and fraud in the use of the
public funds of state institutions.
Primary data show that corruptionisone of the mainconstraints to Macedonian
companies.Around 66.5%of surveyed companiesbelieve that corruption poses an
obstacle to businesses, with 22.4%of respondents completely agreeingwith this
statement.
Mostly
Source:Employers‟ Survey 2013
DK/NA
Note:combining the „mostly‟ and „completely categories amounts to 66.5%
7

7. Growt h Depends on
Access t o E x t e r n a l Finance
Afirm‟s growth is limited if it can only obtain finance internally or throughinformal networks. The
full growth potential of firms, and the economicgrowth of a country as a whole, cannot be realised
without adequate externalfinancing.
Theperception of Macedonian companiesis that most firms (64.1%)rely on self-financing, and this
affectsgrowthand employment.Most businesses do not consider that their financing is adequate for
their needs, and believe that their ability to raise capital has an effect on production.
Figure 3.1.
Financingadequacy for firms (responses to
the question: to what extent do you agree
with the statement that “firm financing is
adequate according your needs?”)
Disagree
SomewhatAgree
Agree Completely
agree
DK/NA
Self-financing results from both the preferences of businesses and the lack of access to external
finance.
than the reference countries.
Figure 3.3. Companies‟ perceptions of the lack of external finance aresupported by such indicators as
credit to private sector (asa percentageof GD ),where Macedonia is performing morepoorly
P
250
200
150
100
50
0
Macedonia
Ireland
Source:World Bank,World Development Indicators
8
BUSINESSPRIORITIESFO A TE R W H
RF S RG O T
Slovenia
Croatia
Bulgaria
Serbia

8. T
able 3.1.
Financingpreferences
Equity
reserves
(retained
profit)
New
equity,
own and from
family, friends
New equity,
outside family
and friends
Short term loan
What are
What are
yours
yours financfinancing
ing
pref- erences preferencfor
es for
investments?
working
capital?
48.4
-0.25
95.8
1.07
60.6
0.18
Long term loan
51.6
-0.09
Don‟t know/
Does not apply
Total
46.5
-0.33
46.5
42%
1.76
83.6
Figure 3.3.
T three obstacles to access to credit
op
-0.33
16%
12%
Bankask
Interest rate
too much
too high
information
in order to
approve a loan
Banks are not
willing to bear
the risks
Domesticcredit to the private sector (
%of GDP)
F new businesses therearefew „business angels‟, limited availability of venturecapital and little practice
or
of making initial public offerings.Banksarea key sourceof external financing. Thepreference for selffinancing is perhaps related to the perception that financial products arenot adapted to the needs of
companiesof different sizes, and particularly not to small and medium enterprises (SMEs).Policies,
regulations and services to promote access to financial services for small and medium enterprises are
insufficiently implemented.
Themajority of businesses see accessto credit as a constraint (69.4%).
Key recommendat i o n s
`
`
`
Increase accessto finance for the
private sector,which should include the
National Bank of the Republic of
Macedonia
taking measuresto decrease the cost
of credit, along with further availability
of investment credits with government
subsidiesfor interest rates;
Promote furtherdevelopment of the
financial sector,stimulating larger banks
and possible specialisation, with the
development of investment banking and
new financial products;
Implement government-led policy and
regulatoryincentives to encourage
financial institutions to lend to SMEs.The
government should support banks focusing
on SMEs;
`
Offer finance training,advisory services
and programmesto companymanagers;
`
Develop affordable financial services for
firms through public-private partnerships,
covering different stages of development and
different sizes of companies;
`
Work both on the demand and supply sides
of equity funding, e.g.by promoting business
angels and venturecapital. Thefounding of
the Public Innovation Fund is a positive step,
and the Fund should be made operational as
soon as possible.
9

9. INVEST INNOVATE, GLOBALIS
,
E, BE COMPETITIVE
F
air
competition is healthy for society and business. It encourages continuous improvement
amongcompetitors, new investments in technology and human capital, and a continuous
struggle to improve.
T
able 4.1.
Competition and anti-monopoly policy indicators,2012
Intensity
of local
competition
Macedoni
a
Ireland
119
Effectiveness of antimonopoly
policy
96
Degree of
customer
orientatio
n
40
22
11
Slovenia
41
64
52
Croatia
120
90
107
Bulgaria
101
108
69
Serbia
137
142
135
92
Source:World Economic F
orum, GlobalCompetiveness Index
2013-2014
Local competition in Macedonia seems quite low,
with the country ranked 119th in G I(see T
C
able 4.1).
Macedonian companies are also only moderately
oriented towards their customers.
Thereis much room for improvement in the
effectivenessof anti-monopoly policy, as
assessed by the GCI.Among the companies
surveyed in the Employers‟ Survey,only a
small proportion (22.4%)report that they face
monopolies or monopolistic practices in their
areaof operation. Macedonian companies
also report that they respond moderately to
price reductions of their competitors, whether
domestic or foreign.
Innovations help to drive greater growth and
increased living standards. However,the level of
investmentin researchand development (R&D)
in Macedonia isquite low,at less than 0.2%of
G P addition, companiesinvest very little in
D .In
new technologies and innovations, as the data
10
BUSINESSPRIORITIESFO A TE R W H
RF S RG O T
fromthe GlobalCompetiveness Index confirms,
notwithstanding recent government efforts to
promoteR&D.In addition, Macedonia is ranked
133rd for firm-level technology absorption.
T
able 4.2.
CompanySpending on R&D,2012
Country
Rank
Value (1-7,
where 7th is
highest)
2.5
Macedonia
123
Ireland
21
4.3
Slovenia
47
3.4
Croatia
76
3.0
Bulgaria
92
2.9
Serbia
132
2.3
Source:World Economic F
orum, GlobalCompetiveness Index
2013-2014
In the Employers‟ Survey,the most popular
response (37.6%)is that companiesin Macedonia
do not engagein R Dat all. Comparedto this,
&
36%believed that some companiesareinvolved
in R Dactivities. Themajority of respondents
&
acknowledgethat the government occasionally
(30%of responses), sometimes (22.4%)or often
(1.8%)provides assistanceto firms to invest in
R&D.
Companies in general aresatisfied with the
protection of intellectual property rights.
Themajority of firms in the Employers‟ Survey
(80%)report that wageincreases at their
company have exceeded productivitygrowth
(seeFigure 4.1),which negatively affects
competitiveness. This issue may be related to an
ineffective system of wage-negotiations.

10. Figure 4.1.
Wage and productivity growth (%)
Data fromthe GlobalCompetiveness Index show
that workersin Macedonia receivevery little
training,with the country ranked126th for “extent
of staff training”. Many respondents (26.5%)
state that thereis no government support for
companiesto increase their productivity.Alarge
number of companies(29%)do not know if there
areany such programmes.
No,Not at All
Mostly
Somewhat
Completely
DK/NA
Informal economicactivity and informal
employment create unfair competition. Primary
data collected by the research confirm that
informaleconomicactivityisquite widespread:
morethan 70%of firms report that they face
competition from informal or unregistered
businesses(seeFigure 4.2).Moreover,40%of all
companiescomplain that they often or always
compete with informal businesses.
Source:Employers‟ Survey 2013
Figure 4.2.
Competition frominformal firms (
%of respondents)
7,1
11,8
38,8
35,9
6,5
Informal firms are major competition
20,0
5,9
25,3
21,2
7,6
Competeagainst informal firms
Never
Rarely
Often
Always
Don`tknow / Doesnot apply
Source:Employers‟ Survey 2013
Even when they see themselvesas „victims‟ of informal businesses, companiesin Macedonia report
that they quite often use informal businesses as their suppliers or subcontractors.
Key recommendat i o n s
`
Provide special financing to companies
for investments in new technologies (those
no older than threeyears);
` Increase state funding for R Dto meet the
&
objectives set in the National programmefor
R D2012-2016;
&
` Devise measuresthat promote
competitivenessthrough quality instead of
the current price competitiveness;
` Align growth in wages with
productivity growth;
`
`
`
`
`
Promote training of workers; establish a
fund for co-financing the training of workers
in companies;
Improvethe effectivenessof the
wage negotiation system;
Improvethe link between vocational
schools and companiesto enhance workers‟
skills;
F
ocus on reforming the secondary
education system,and re-direct some
funding from higher education to secondary
education;
Increase the quality of the adult
education system.
11

11. Develop and Utilise Domest i c
E n t re p re n e u ria l Pot e n t i a l
Despite the positive assessmentof the business climate in international rankings, the number of
business start-ups in Macedonia isdecreasing.According to the G I2012–2013, the main challenges
C
to doing business in Macedonia arerelated to access to financing (17.1%),an inadequately educated
workforce(12.5%),corruption (11.5%),inefficient government bureaucracy(11.4%)and inadequate
supply of infrastructure(9.3%).With a highly export-dependent economyand uncertainty surrounding
Macedonia‟s main trading partners in the European Union, the government should focusonutilising
domesticentrepreneurialpotential.
T
able 5.1.
The top five problematic factorsfor doing
business in Macedonia
Factors
Access to financing
% of respondents
17.1
Inadequately
educated workforce
Corruption
12.5
Inefficient
government
bureaucracy
Inadequate supply
of infrastructure
11.4
11.5
9.3
Source:World Economic F
orum, GlobalCompetiveness Index
2012-2013
Thegovernment should design a comprehensive
entrepreneurshipdevelopment programme
that foreseesinnovative financing for start-
Figure 5.1.
Five steps for
business growth
Government
support
BUSINESSPRIORITIESFO A TE R W H
RF S RG O T
Alongsidethe current favourable tax system
for foreign investors, the government should
introducenew tax alleviation measuresfor
business start-ups as well as for high-growth
companies,which would give additional impetus
for entrepreneurs looking to start businesses.
Thesecould last for maximum of two years and
include exception frompaying tax on personal
incomefor employees for the first year.
Networking
of businesses
T
ax
alleviations
12
ups,including seed financing. Financial support
should also be streamlined, along with advisory
services,in one business support
agency,working closely in liaison with
representatives of organisations of
entrepreneurs,banksand civil society
organisations (CSOs).It should be made
significantly quicker and cheaper to wind-up
businesses, in order to challenge stereotypes
about failure.Repeat entrepreneursshould
be promoted. Moreover,the private business
development sector should be further advanced
and coordinated with key institutions, including
the Agency for Employment and Ministry of
Economy.
Strongerroleof
entrepreneurial
education
Alternative
types of
enterprises

12. Organisations of entrepreneursshould provide
moresupport to networkingamongst
businesses in order to become facilitators of
knowledge transfer to employers and their
employees.Their advocacy and lobbying roles
should also be strengthened; the government
would benefit from recommendations made by
organisations of entrepreneurs.Organisations of
entrepreneursshould focus moreattention on
regionalisation and internationalisation.
Thelow participation as entrepreneursof young
people, women and members of other vulnerable
groups has a negative impact on the overall
entrepreneurial level of the country.Thereis a
gap between existing values and entrepreneurial
activities in Macedonia. Thegovernment should
allocate funds for the promotion of women‟s
entrepreneurshipas well as socialenterprises
and green economyendeavours,which areseen
as increasingly sustainable types of businesses.
Therearevery few links between educational
institutions and business sectors,which
contributes to mismatch in the labour market
between demand and supply.Thegovernment
should introduceentrepreneurshipeducation to
elementaryschools,foregrounding the gradual
introduction of new entrepreneurial subjects,
with exposureto real lifebusiness situations. The
government should also improve the work of
the new V
ocational Centre and Adult Education
Centre,as another way of improving the fit
between demand and supply by enhancing the
job skills of uneducated and unemployed people.
Key recommendat i o n s
`
F
ocus on utilising domestic
entrepreneurial potential, understood as
human potential;
`
Provide increased government support,
including financial and non-financial support,
to business start-ups;
`
Improvethe process for winding-up
businesses, with lower costs, and support
repeatedbusiness start-up endeavours;
`
Introducetax alleviations for business
start- ups and high-growth businesses;
`
Encourage partnership relations with
organisations of employers and employees,
and enhance their capacity;
`
Promote alternative types of social
entrepreneurship that result in sustainable
businesses.P
articularly enable easier access
to funding for women entrepreneursand
greeneconomy endeavours;
`
Modernise formal and non-formal education
systems (e.g.adult education)and implement
entrepreneurial education,starting from
elementary schools.
13

13. Organizat i o n o f
Еmployers o f Macedonia
TheOrganization of Еmployersof Macedonia (ОЕМ)is the biggest leading organization
of employers in the whole country,established in 2004. Main goal of O Mis to
E
advocate the employers‟ interests, and the interest about the social partnership as
well, and to realize the development of rights and freedomsof the employers in the
economicand social sphere.Ourvision is Macedonia to becomethe most increasing
economy on the Balkantill 2017.
O Mfocuses on the social dialogue on each level: European level through the Joint
E
Consultative Committee (JCC),national level with the Economicand SocialCouncil
(ESC),bipartite level with the branch collective agreements and collective agreement
on a level of employer.
O Malso advocates the employers‟ interest s through its membersin the
E
management boards of the Employment Service Agencyof Macedonia, Pensionand
disability insurance fund of Macedonia, Council for higher education curriculums
accreditation, National Entrepreneurship and CompetitivenessCouncil, and last but
not least some other authorities of the institutions.
Moreover,together with the participation of O Min the Joint Consultative
E
Committee, part of European Economicand SocialCouncil (EESC),more information
about the accession of Macedonia to European Union (EU)are given to the
employers, through recommendations adoption to the government of Macedonia
and the E
Uinstitutions.
Theemployers of O M
E ,with its four members fromtotal 12,participate in the policy
creation from economic-social sphere in the Economicand SocialCouncil( S
E C)on
national level, in which the other two parties are representatives from the trade
unions and four representatives from the government.
O Mrepresents over 17employers‟ branch associations, including the small and
E
medium enterprises, as well as larger corporative enterprises in the country.
Therefore,O Msigned 10 collective agreementson branch level and general collective
E
agreement in the private sector which is mandatory for all of the employers of the
above mentioned sector.
14
BUSINESSPRIORITIESFO A TE R W H
RF S RG O T

14. Business Confederat i o n
o f Macedonia
Withthe formation of the Confederation of Employers in 2001as an association of citizensemployers we beganto write a new history of the freedom of association of employers in
Macedonia.
Thanksto the support of the International Labour Organization and employers members of
the International Organization of Employers and the European Organization of Employers (at
that time UNICE)now B S I E UR Ewe managed to agreewith the government
U NN SSE OP
of the Republic of Macedonia in 2005to register the organization as a legitimate social
partner of the Government,the trade unions, C O
S sand local governments in Macedonia.
Business Confederation of Macedonia as a non-profit, independent organization that
collaborates with partners representing the interests of its members and partner
organizations on the basis of decisions that arebased on democratic and transparent
ways of analysis, communicationand decision-makingin line with the Statute of the
Confederation.
T
oday B Mrepresent morethan 6,500companies through direct membership and through
C
collective membership organized in 13partner organizations with participation in the G Pof
D
the country with over 40%.Theemployees of the Business Confederation of Macedonia are
professionally trained, managed by nine members of the Management Board and 30
membersof the organization assembly.Themain office is in Skopjeand we have a regional
offices in Bitola, Prilep, T
etovo for better communications and services to the members in
order to represent their interests in the socio - economic policies, collective bargaining,
standardsand education in the national and international level. Thestrategy 2010-2015
of the organization is carried out based on previously set goals and objectives, but the
basic vision of the organization is that “Associatedemployers for competitive Macedonian
economy”.
Б З СКО Д Р ЦИЈАНАМА
И НИ
НФЕ Е А
КЕДОНИЈА
BUSINESSC N E E A
O F D R TIONO
FMA
CEDONIA
15

15. ORGANIZATION OFEMPLOYERSOFMACEDONIA
ul.Dimitrie Cupovski br.13, Skopje,
Republic of Macedonia,
telephone: ..389 2 3215085
e-mail: info@orm.org.mk
www.orm.org.mk
BUSINESS CONFEDERATION OFMACEDONIA
Vasil Gorgov 11,P.O.Box 880,
Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
TelJfax: +389 2 3224 762
e-mail: contact@bcm.mk
web-site: www.bcm.mk