LIANG Zheng: Comparison of China and India in R&D globalisationSTEPS Centre
LIANG Zheng, Associate Professor, CISTP, Tsinghua University.
Presentation to the UK-China Innovation Workshop for Sustainable and Equitable Development, Tsinghua University, 19 March 2010, co-organised by China Institute for Science and Technology Policy (CISTP) at Tsinghua University and the STEPS Centre.
http://anewmanifesto.org/news/china-workshop-presentationschina-workshop-presentations/
Harmonogram postupných kroků realizace návrhů nového hodnocení a financování ...MEYS, MŠMT in Czech
Tato implementační doporučení zpracoval expertní tým IPN Metodika v závěrečné fázi projektu na základě zkušeností získaných během úzké spolupráce se zpracovatelem studie „Metodika hodnocení ve výzkumu a vývoji a zásady financování“ společností Technopolis Group z Velké Británie dále také díky bohatým zkušenostem z realizace pilotního ověření navržené metodiky hodnocení týmem projektu, díky intenzivním diskusím se zainteresovanými subjekty, s odbornou veřejností a zahraničními experty po celou dobu trvání projektu. Doporučení jsou výsledkem podrobných diskusí realizačních aspektů v rámci širokého expertního týmu IPN Metodika.
LIANG Zheng: Comparison of China and India in R&D globalisationSTEPS Centre
LIANG Zheng, Associate Professor, CISTP, Tsinghua University.
Presentation to the UK-China Innovation Workshop for Sustainable and Equitable Development, Tsinghua University, 19 March 2010, co-organised by China Institute for Science and Technology Policy (CISTP) at Tsinghua University and the STEPS Centre.
http://anewmanifesto.org/news/china-workshop-presentationschina-workshop-presentations/
Harmonogram postupných kroků realizace návrhů nového hodnocení a financování ...MEYS, MŠMT in Czech
Tato implementační doporučení zpracoval expertní tým IPN Metodika v závěrečné fázi projektu na základě zkušeností získaných během úzké spolupráce se zpracovatelem studie „Metodika hodnocení ve výzkumu a vývoji a zásady financování“ společností Technopolis Group z Velké Británie dále také díky bohatým zkušenostem z realizace pilotního ověření navržené metodiky hodnocení týmem projektu, díky intenzivním diskusím se zainteresovanými subjekty, s odbornou veřejností a zahraničními experty po celou dobu trvání projektu. Doporučení jsou výsledkem podrobných diskusí realizačních aspektů v rámci širokého expertního týmu IPN Metodika.
Podklady a doporučení pro zapracování do věcného záměru zákona nahrazujícího ...MEYS, MŠMT in Czech
Dokument analyzuje, zda vůbec a popřípadě v jaké míře jsou nutné změny regulatorního rámce v oblasti výzkumu, vývoje a inovací, které by si vyžádala realizace návrhů vzešlých z výstupů Individuálního projektu národního Efektivní systém hodnocení a financování výzkumu, vývoje a inovací. Jsou zohledněny i probíhající záměry úprav legislativních předpisů.
Závěrečná zpráva 1 je v první ze Závěrečných zpráv studie navrhující Metodiku hodnocení a zásady institucionálního financování výzkumu a vývoje (VaV) v České republice. Metodika hodnocení (MH), která je navržena v této zprávě, definuje klíčové principy budoucí Metodiky hodnocení a stanovuje její základní součásti.
+ http://metodika.reformy-msmt.cz/hodnoceni-vyzkumnych-organizaci
Intervention de Silvère MERCIER, Chargé de la médiation et des innovations numériques à la Bibliothèque Publique d’Information (Centre Pompidou, Paris)
La Création de Contenu dans votre Inbound StratégieNoemie Aguettant
1. Pourquoi faire de l'inbound marketing est important aujourd'hui
2. Où s'inscrit la création de contenu dans cette stratégie
3. Les différents types de contenu
3. Techniques à suivre pour s'assurer du succès de votre contenu
Podklady a doporučení pro zapracování do věcného záměru zákona nahrazujícího ...MEYS, MŠMT in Czech
Dokument analyzuje, zda vůbec a popřípadě v jaké míře jsou nutné změny regulatorního rámce v oblasti výzkumu, vývoje a inovací, které by si vyžádala realizace návrhů vzešlých z výstupů Individuálního projektu národního Efektivní systém hodnocení a financování výzkumu, vývoje a inovací. Jsou zohledněny i probíhající záměry úprav legislativních předpisů.
Závěrečná zpráva 1 je v první ze Závěrečných zpráv studie navrhující Metodiku hodnocení a zásady institucionálního financování výzkumu a vývoje (VaV) v České republice. Metodika hodnocení (MH), která je navržena v této zprávě, definuje klíčové principy budoucí Metodiky hodnocení a stanovuje její základní součásti.
+ http://metodika.reformy-msmt.cz/hodnoceni-vyzkumnych-organizaci
Intervention de Silvère MERCIER, Chargé de la médiation et des innovations numériques à la Bibliothèque Publique d’Information (Centre Pompidou, Paris)
La Création de Contenu dans votre Inbound StratégieNoemie Aguettant
1. Pourquoi faire de l'inbound marketing est important aujourd'hui
2. Où s'inscrit la création de contenu dans cette stratégie
3. Les différents types de contenu
3. Techniques à suivre pour s'assurer du succès de votre contenu
Данилова М.И., МФТИ. Продвижение вуза в международных рейтингах: подходы МФТИ. IBS
Обсудить материал и узнать много нового по теме можно в экспертном сообществе IBS, посвященном вопросам информатизации вузов: https://www.facebook.com/groups/UniFuture/
Материалы всероссийской практической конференции «Современный вуз – на пике новых информационных технологий» (Казань, 22-23 мая 2014). Организаторы: Министерство образования и науки Республики Татарстан, Поволжская государственная академия физической культуры, спорта и туризма и компания IBS
ReportsnReports – Remote Sensing Technologies and Global MarketsReportsnReports
Remote Sensing Technologies and Global Markets describes the fundamentals of remote sensing technology and provides 2009 through 2014 global, U.S. and regional forecasts for the 20 most robust applications for remotes sensing products, 11 basic types of remote sensing instruments and four basic types of instrument platforms. The report is divided into 30 chapters and contains 144 tables.
Presentation by Philippe Ellul, Senior Science Officer, Consortium/System Office on the monitoring, evaluation, and impact assessment framework in CGIAR and the role of monitoring and reporting
Global Water Pipeline Leak Detection System (LDS) Market: Analysis and Foreca...AzothAnalytics
The report titled, “Global Water Pipeline Leak Detection System (LDS) Market By Technology, By Equipment, By Type, By Location of Application, By Region, By Country – Analysis and Forecast (2017 Edition) - By Technology (Equipment, Inspection Service), By Equipment (Acoustic, Non Acoustics), By Type ( Continuous, Non Continuous), By Location of Application (Underwater, Above the ground, Underground)” has covered and analysed the potential of Global Water Pipeline Leak Detection System Market and provides statistics and information on market size, shares and growth factors.
http://azothanalytics.com/report/energy-utilities/global-water-pipeline-leak-detection-system-lds-market-by-technology-by-equipment-by-type-by-location-of-application-by-region-by-country-analysis-and-forecast-2017-edition-r12123
The organic photodiodes are widely used as both sensors and detectors and are applied in different areas including imaging, display devices, security imaging applications, spectrographic applications etc. This landscape report helps in understanding various developments made in organic photodiodes for improving quantum efficiency, sensitivity, responsivity or reducing dark current. The insights relating to active companies, countries, inventors as well as whitespace and possible opportunities for R&D, innovation and patent portfolio strategies are derived from the patent landscape analysis. To get in-depth analysis of specific technology areas and the competitive patent landscape similar to this, Please contact us at info@dexpatent.com
A new study, co-authored by UNU-MERIT, says that Europe outperforms the USA for new start-ups and licence agreements. However, Europe trails the USA for patent applications, licence income and invention disclosures. The European Knowledge Transfer Report 2013 draws on the most geographically diverse survey of knowledge transfer activities in Europe, covering more than 700 organizations in over 30 countries. Researcher Nordine Es-Sadki explains the approach, data and details below. http://www.merit.unu.edu/permalink.php?id=968
Introduction to E-Waste. Can your blender save our planet? Lecture by Nicolas...Plan A
Do you like your smartphone? Do you use your smartphone? But what if it stops working? Do you take it to the doctor or simply get a new one?
E-Waste, or what happens with your smartphone after you part ways with one another, is one of the biggest waste challenges our planet faces today. It is the fastest growing waste stream globally and is an important challenge due to its valuable metal content, heterogeneity and potential toxicity.
About Nicolas Schaeffer
Nicolas Schaeffer is a researcher working in the chemistry department at the University of Aveiro (Portugal) investigating the development of sustainable systems for the recovery of metals from electronic waste. The primary tenet of the circular economy is the concept of value recovery: all waste possesses an inherent value, which if properly managed can be extracted. In this new context of global environmental remediation, sustainable, effective and affordable waste management is an issue of critical importance.
To get in touch:
nicolas.schaeffer@au.pt
hi@plana.earth
Pilot test of new evaluation methodology of research organisationsMEYS, MŠMT in Czech
In 2015, the pilot test of a new evaluation methodology of research, development and innovation, in which twelve research organisations
active predominantly in two fields (Chemistry and History) participated, was carried out. Three main and nine subject panels, in which thirty-five
foreign and six local experts were present, prepared evaluation reports of thirty-one registered, field-specific research units. The feedback of the panellists and the institutions evaluated, which are useful for the preparation of a nationwide evaluation of research organisations in the Czech Republic, are the key output of the pilot test.
This report is one of the three Final reports of the study developing an evaluation methodology and institutional funding principles for the R&D system in the Czech Republic. It describes the methodology for the National Evaluation of Research Organisations (NERO) in the Czech Republic.
This report is the one of the three Final reports of a study developing an evaluation methodology and institutional funding principles for the R&D system in the Czech Republic. It describes the new principles for the institutional funding of research organisations (RO) in the Czech Republic.
The Small Pilot Evaluation and the Use of the RD&I Information System for Eva...MEYS, MŠMT in Czech
This report is one of the three Final reports for the study designing a new R&D evaluation methodology and funding principles for the Czech republic. It reports on the outcomes of two distinct strands of analyses, i.e. the Small Pilot Evaluation and the (potential) use of the RD&I Information System (IS) as a tool for information, in particular for evaluation purposes.
Summary Report / R&D Evaluation Methodology and Funding PrinciplesMEYS, MŠMT in Czech
This study has been undertaken under a contract to the Ministry of Education, Youth
and Sports of the Czech Republic by a team from Technopolis, the Technology Centre
ASCR, NIFU, and Infoscience Praha.
V tradičním pojetí jsou rizika chápána negativně, tedy jako hrozby. Tím, že jsou identifikována a vyhodnocena, vytvářejí ale současně příležitosti, které lze využít pro zlepšení výsledku projektu nebo pro snadnější uvádění jeho výsledků do života. Z veřejného projednávání dokumentů IPN Metodika, diskusí na konferencích a zpětné vazby výzkumných organizací, které se účastnily dvou pilotních ověřování nové metodiky hodnocení, byly získány některé podněty, které jsou považovány za rizika pro zavádění národního hodnocení výzkumných organizací (NERO).
Analýza má posloužit k podrobnějšímu rozboru možností a k doporučení a zdůvodnění výběru určitého řešení. Jednoznačná identifikace je důležitá nejen pro výzkumníky, aby mohli prezentovat výsledky své vědecké činnosti, ale využívá se též pro hodnocení autorů a pracovišť, vydavatelům a poskytovatelům finančních podpor zjednodušuje administrativu a usnadňuje organizaci databází. Zavedením trvalého jedinečného identifikátoru výzkumníka se vyřeší jednoznačné přiřazení výstupů a dalších profesních aktivit danému vědeckému pracovníkovi.
Dokument je zpracovaný na základě zkušeností z pilotního ověření navrhované metodiky hodnocení výzkumných organizací a z diskusí s odbornou veřejností během celé doby trvání projektu. Zaměřen je nejen na změny vnitřních předpisů veřejných vysokých škol, ale také na dlouhodobé záměry vysokých škol. Jsou formulována doporučení pro veřejné vysoké školy na jedné straně a MŠMT na straně druhé.
Pilotní ověření návrhu nové metodiky hodnocení výzkumných organizacíMEYS, MŠMT in Czech
Dokumenty shrnují výsledky pilotního ověření metodiky NERO hodnocení výzkumné činnosti vycházející ze závěrů a doporučení Technopolisu, které bylo realizováno týmem projektu v průběhu roku 2015.
Studie proveditelnosti institucionálního zajištění navrhovaného systému hodno...MEYS, MŠMT in Czech
Ve studii jsou popsány variantně podoby útvaru, který bude realizovat hodnocení výzkumných organizací tak, aby to odpovídalo výstupům projektu IPN Metodika. Jsou zvažovány výhody i nevýhody jednotlivých možných řešení. Podrobně je analyzována finanční náročnost hodnotícího postupu NERO v přímých nákladech, tedy na straně instituce zajišťující hodnocení.
Metodika hodnocení přínosů ČR v mezinárodních organizacích výzkumu a vývoje /...MEYS, MŠMT in Czech
Mezinárodní organizace výzkumu a vývoje představují de facto výzkumné infrastruktury, jejichž činnost se na rozdíl od ostatních výzkumných infrastruktur, ať již národního či mezinárodního charakteru, řídí na základě mezinárodního práva veřejného.
Souhrnná zpráva / Metodika hodnocení ve Výzkumu a vývoji a zásady financováníMEYS, MŠMT in Czech
Souhrnná zpráva shrnuje výsledky práce provedené v rámci studie vytvářející novou Metodiku hodnocení výzkumu a vývoje a zásady institucionálního financování v ČR, která probíhala v letech 2014–15. V principu stojí na třech Závěrečných zprávách (Final Report 1–3) a deseti Podkladových zprávách (Background Reports).
+ http://metodika.reformy-msmt.cz/souhrnna-zprava
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Souhrnné tabulky s údaji o počtu pracovníků a výstupů EvU a jejich RU
1. Pilotní ověření návrhu nové metodiky
hodnocení výzkumných organizací
Pilot Test of New Evaluation Methodology
of Research Organisations
Samostatný doplňující dokument 7:
Souhrnné tabulky s údaji o počtu pracovníků
a výstupů EvU a jejich RU
Background document 7:
Overview Tables of EvU and their RUs
2. R&D Evaluation Methodology and Funding Principles
Overview tables of Evaluated units and their Research Units
3. 1. Evaluated Units and their Research Units
Name EvU Type of RO
Researchers
HC(1)
Researchers
FTE (2)
PhD
trained(3)
Total
outputs (4)
Scholarly
outputs (5) SF code Subject field OECD Code RU
1.4 Chemical Sciences VSCHT_FCHT_14
2.5 Materials Engineering VSCHT_FCHT_25
2.4 Chemical Engineering VSCHT_FTOP_24
2.7 Environmental Engineering VSCHT_FTOP_27
1.4 Chemical Sciences VSCHT_FPBT_14
1.6 Biological Sciences VSCHT_FPBT_16
2.9 Industrial Biotechnology VSCHT_FPBT_29
1.4 Chemical Sciences VSCHT_FCHI_14
2.4 Chemical Engineering VSCHT_FCHI_24
1.4 Chemical Sciences VUT_FCH_14
1.6 Biological Sciences VUT_FCH_16
2.5 Materials Engineering VUT_FCH_25
2.7 Environmental Engineering VUT_FCH_27
J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR 119 94 45 1147 1124 1.4 Chemical Sciences AVCR_UFCH_14
1.4 Chemical Sciences AVCR_UCHP_14
2.4 Chemical Engineering AVCR_UCHP_24
2.5 Materials Engineering AVCR_UCHP_25
2.7 Environmental Engineering AVCR_UCHP_27
Centre for Organic Chemistry Ltd. IBRO-RTO 10 9 0 42 21 1.4 Chemical Sciences COCH_14
The Research Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Inc. IBRO-RTO 65 52 17 209 119 1.4 Chemical Sciences VUANCH_14
6.1 History and Archaeology UP_FF_61
6.2 Languages and Literature UP_FF_62
6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion UP_FF_63
6.1 History and Archaeology JU_FF_61
6.2 Languages and Literature JU_FF_62
The Institute of History of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR 46 46 4 745 710 6.1 History and Archaeology AVCR_HU_61
6.1 History and Archaeology AVCR_USD_61
6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion AVCR_USD_63
The National Technical Museum NatRes 16 16 0 167 159 6.1 History and Archaeology NTM_61
1.4 Chemical Sciences NA_14
6.1 History and Archaeology NA_61
(1) Number of Core Researchers in 2014, source self-assesment report of RU Q009-Q011
(2) When determining FTE devoted to research activities for teaching personnel of HEI the physical FTE was divided by 2
(3) PhD trained in 2014, source self-assesment report of RU, Q020 or Q024
(4) Total outputs for period 2009-2013 as registered in the National RD&I IS
(5) Books, Chapters, Article in reviewed proceedings and Journals for period 2009-2013 as registred in the National RD&I IS
ScRO-ASCR
ScRO-HEI
464
867
635
41
82
42
4
839
Humanitites
23 441
NatRes 9 168
ScRO-HEI 44 554
ScRO-HEI 40 626
NaturalSciences,EngineeringandTechnology
ScRO-HEI 35
1618
ScRO-HEI 69 1678
36 846ScRO-HEI
1667
1783
1561
204
157
90
1024
ScRO-HEI 81 18121939
1134
215
149
177
175
78
154
173
77
82
83
65
36
43
71
66
584
0
Brno University of Technology -Faculty of Chemistry
The Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the AS CR
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of
Chemical Engineering
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of
Food and Biochemical Technology
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of
Chemical Technology
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of
Environmental Technology
The University of Pardubice - Faculty of Arts and Philosophy
The University of South Bohemia in ČeskéBudějovice -
Faculty of Philosophy
The Institute for Contemporary History of the AS CR
The National Archives
ScRO-ASCR
7. Meaning of codes used in tables of scholarly outputs and their bibliometric indicators (3a-c)
Percentages of articles by RUs published in different classes of journals (indicators A4 and F3 from the Bibliometric report)
Jimp Articles in journals registered in the Web of Science (Czech republic in the field and RUs)
JSC Articles in sources registered in SCOPUS, which are not registered in WoS
Jerih1 Articles in reviewed periodicals in the ERIH database, which are not registered in WoS or SCOPUS
Jrec Articles in a reviewed Czech periodicals, which are not registered in WoS, SCOPUS or ERIH
Jother Articles in periodicals, which are not in any previous group
Percentages of WoS publications (Czech Republic and RUs) in the most cited journals2 in the field for period 2009-2013 (indicators
A6 and C4 from the Bibliometric report)
Jour-10% Percentage of WoS publications in the 10% most cited journals
Jour-25% Percentage of WoS publications in the 25% most cited journals
Jour-upper50% Percentage of WoS publications in the 50% most cited journals
Jour-lower50% Percentage of WoS publications in the 50% least cited journals
Mean Field Normalized Citation Impact
3
(Czech Republic and RUs) for period 2009-2012 (indicators A7 and D1 from the Bibliometric
report)
CitImpWorld Compared to the world average (=1,00)
CitImpE28 Compared to the E28 average (=1,00)
Percentage of WoS publications (Czech Republic and RUs) among the most cited publications
4
in the field for period 2009-2012
(indicators A8 and D2 from the Bibliometric report)
Cited-10% Percentage of WoS publications among the 10% most cited publications
Cited-25% Percentage of WoS publications among the 25% most cited publications
Cited- upper50% Percentage of WoS publications among the 50% most cited publications
Cited-lower50% Percentage of WoS publications among the 50% least cited publications
1
ERIH - The European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences is the list of journals, which covers the Humanities and the Social
Sciences. See, more at: http://erihplus.nsd.no/.
2
based on Journal Impact Factors in the 2014 edition of the Journal Citation Reports, for journals registered in two or more WoS subfields the
average value is taken to determine percentile
3
based on 2014 edition of Journal Citation Reports; for RU articles in journals registered in two or more WoS subfieds the average value is taken as
Citation Impact
4
based on 2014 edition of Journal Citation Reports, for RU articles in journals registered in two or more WoS subfieds the average value is taken to
determine percentile
9. 3b. Scholarly outputs and their bibliometric indicators of RUs in individual EvUs (2009-2013); non HEI (Nat.
Sci and Eng. Techn.)
AVCR_UFCH COCH VUANCH
1.4 1.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 1.4 1.4
Researchers (1)
FTE (2)
94 12 21 12 21 8 52
PhD trained (3)
45 7 14 6 14 0 17
Scholarly outputs 1124 146 194 192 307 21 119
Books (B) 7 0 1 1 1 0 0
Book chapter (C) 42 2 11 6 9 1 5
Article in proceed. (D) 138 26 57 45 122 9 58
Journal article (J) 937 118 125 140 175 11 56
Jimp
95% 96% 90% 91% 87% 82% 61%
JSC
2% 3% 6% 4% 3% 9% 4%
Jerih
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 0%
Jrec
1% 1% 2% 2% 6% 0% 16%
Jother
2% 0% 2% 3% 4% 0% 20%
Jour-10%
Jour-25%
Jour-upper50%
Jour-lower50%
CitImpWorld
CitImpE28
Cited-10%
Cited-25%
Cited- upper50%
Cited-lower50%
(1) Number of Core Researchers in 2014, source self-assesment report of RU Q009-Q011
(2) When determining FTE devoted to research activities for teaching personnel of HEI the physical FTE was divided by 2
(3) PhD trained in 2014, source self-assesment report of RU, Q020 or Q024
AVCR_UCHP
10. 3c. Scholarly outputs and their bibliometric indicators of RUs in individual EvUs (2009-2013); Humanities
AVCR_HU NTM
6.1 6.2 6.3 6.1 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.1 1.4 6.1
Researchers (1)
FTE (2)
13 21 10 14 19 46 16 7 16 2 7
PhD trained (3)
55 0 27 13 29 4 2 2 0 0 0
Scholarly outputs 280 175 99 375 251 710 280 161 159 28 140
Books (B) 38 12 7 42 30 125 47 13 12 0 23
Book chapter (C) 100 68 24 93 96 329 156 66 104 14 28
Article in proceed. (D) 40 24 6 54 42 34 8 8 9 8 9
Journal article (J) 102 71 62 186 83 222 69 74 34 6 80
Jimp
0% 3% 3% 0% 2% 1% 4% 12% 3% 50% 0%
JSC
7% 6% 26% 12% 17% 7% 7% 8% 18% 0% 0%
Jerih
66% 11% 21% 26% 40% 38% 41% 16% 12% 0% 9%
Jrec
23% 44% 29% 48% 20% 45% 10% 55% 68% 17% 88%
Jother
5% 37% 21% 15% 20% 9% 38% 8% 0% 33% 4%
(1) Number of Core Researchers in 2014, source self-assesment report of RU Q009-Q011
(2) When determining FTE devoted to research activities for teaching personnel of HEI the physical FTE was divided by 2
(3) PhD trained in 2014, source self-assesment report of RU, Q020 or Q024
UP_FF JU_FF AVCR_USD NA
11. R&D Evaluation Methodology and Funding Principles
Overview tables of Research Units by disciplinary areas and subject
fields
12. 1. Research units in main disciplinary areas and subject fields
Disciplinary
area Subject field Name EvU Type of RO Code RU
Researchers
HC(1)
Researchers
FTE(2)
PhD
trained(3)
Total
outputs(4)
Scholarly
outputs (5)
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Chemical Technology ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FCHT_14 67 31 100 614 542
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FPBT_14 43 19 61 489 433
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Chemical Engineering ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FCHI_14 77 28 42 642 619
Brno University of Technology -Faculty of Chemistry ScRO-HEI VUT_FCH_14 22 12 39 519 319
J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR AVCR_UFCH_14 119 94 45 1147 1142
The Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR AVCR_UCHP_14 14 12 7 153 146
The Research Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Inc. IBRO-RTO VUANCH_14 65 52 17 209 119
Centre for Organic Chemistry Ltd. IBRO-RTO COCH_14 9 8 0 42 21
The National Archives NatRes NA_14 7 2 0 31 28
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FPBT_16 51 27 62 401 383
Brno University of Technology -Faculty of Chemistry ScRO-HEI VUT_FCH_16 14 6 14 421 193
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Environmental Technology ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FTOP_24 37 18 75 495 433
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Chemical Engineering ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FCHI_24 96 41 115 1193 1059
The Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR AVCR_UCHP_24 29 21 14 230 194
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Chemical Technology ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FCHT_25 108 50 115 1394 1270
Brno University of Technology -Faculty of Chemistry ScRO-HEI VUT_FCH_25 24 13 17 465 265
The Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR AVCR_UCHP_25 16 12 6 209 192
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Environmental Technology ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FTOP_27 41 17 74 665 591
Brno University of Technology -Faculty of Chemistry ScRO-HEI VUT_FCH_27 17 5 20 398 201
The Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR AVCR_UCHP_27 23 21 14 341 307
2.9 Industrial Biotechnology University of Chemistry and Technology Prague - Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology ScRO-HEI VSCHT_FPBT_29 60 25 81 871 802
The University of South Bohemia in ČeskéBudějovice - Faculty of Philosophy ScRO-HEI JU_FF_61 20 14 13 375 375
The University of Pardubice - Faculty of Arts and Philosophy ScRO-HEI UP_FF_61 24 13 55 292 280
The Institute of History of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR AVCR_HU_61 46 46 4 754 710
The Institute for Contemporary History of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR AVCR_USD_61 27 16 2 292 280
The National Technical Museum NatRes NTM_61 16 16 0 167 159
The National Archives NatRes NA_61 37 7 0 147 140
The University of South Bohemia in ČeskéBudějovice - Faculty of Philosophy ScRO-HEI JU_FF_62 39 19 29 260 251
The University of Pardubice - Faculty of Arts and Philosophy ScRO-HEI UP_FF_62 41 21 0 185 175
The University of Pardubice - Faculty of Arts and Philosophy ScRO-HEI UP_FF_63 18 10 27 109 99
The Institute for Contemporary History of the AS CR ScRO-ASCR AVCR_USD_63 9 7 2 167 161
(1) Number of Core Researchers in 2014, source self-assesment report of RU Q009-Q011
(2) When determining FTE devoted to research activities for teaching personnel of HEI the physical FTE was divided by 2
(3) PhD trained in 2014, source self-assesment report of RU, Q020 or Q024
(4) Total outputs for period 2009-2013 as registered in the National RD&I IS
(5) Books, Chapters, Article in reviewed proceedings and Journals for period 2009-2013 as registred in the National RD&I IS
6.2 Languages and Literature
6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and
Religion
1.6 Bilogical Sciences
2 Engineering
and
Technology
1 Natural
Sciences
6 Humanities
1.4 Chemical Sciences
2.4 Chemical Engineering
2.5 Materials Engineering
2.7 Environmental Engineering
6.1 History and Archaeology
16. Meaning of codes used in tables of scholarly outputs and their bibliometric indicators (3a-c)
Percentages of articles by RUs published in different classes of journals (indicators A4 and F3 from the Bibliometric report)
Jimp Articles in journals registered in the Web of Science (Czech republic in the field and RUs)
JSC Articles in sources registered in SCOPUS, which are not registered in WoS
Jerih5 Articles in reviewed periodicals in the ERIH database, which are not registered in WoS or SCOPUS
Jrec Articles in a reviewed Czech periodicals, which are not registered in WoS, SCOPUS or ERIH
Jother Articles in periodicals, which are not in any previous group
Percentages of WoS publications (Czech Republic and RUs) in the most cited journals6 in the field for period 2009-2013 (indicators
A6 and C4 from the Bibliometric report)
Jour-10% Percentage of WoS publications in the 10% most cited journals
Jour-25% Percentage of WoS publications in the 25% most cited journals
Jour-upper50% Percentage of WoS publications in the 50% most cited journals
Jour-lower50% Percentage of WoS publications in the 50% least cited journals
Mean Field Normalized Citation Impact
7
(Czech Republic and RUs) for period 2009-2012 (indicators A7 and D1 from the Bibliometric
report)
CitImpWorld Compared to the world average (=1,00)
CitImpE28 Compared to the E28 average (=1,00)
Percentage of WoS publications (Czech Republic and RUs) among the most cited publications
8
in the field for period 2009-2012
(indicators A8 and D2 from the Bibliometric report)
Cited-10% Percentage of WoS publications among the 10% most cited publications
Cited-25% Percentage of WoS publications among the 25% most cited publications
Cited- upper50% Percentage of WoS publications among the 50% most cited publications
Cited-lower50% Percentage of WoS publications among the 50% least cited publications
5
ERIH - The European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences is the list of journals, which covers the Humanities and the Social
Sciences. See, more at: http://erihplus.nsd.no/.
6
based on Journal Impact Factors in the 2014 edition of the Journal Citation Reports, for journals registered in two or more WoS subfields the
average value is taken to determine percentile
7
based on 2014 edition of Journal Citation Reports; for RU articles in journals registered in two or more WoS subfieds the average value is taken as
Citation Impact
8
based on 2014 edition of Journal Citation Reports, for RU articles in journals registered in two or more WoS subfieds the average value is taken to
determine percentile
20. Pilotní ověření návrhu nové metodiky hodnocení výzkumných organizací
Samostatný doplňující dokument 7
Souhrnné tabulky s údaji o počtu pracovníků a výstupů EvU a jejich RU
Vydává Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy, Karmelitská 7, Praha 1
Individuální projekt národní pro oblast terciárního vzdělávání, výzkumu a vývoje:
Efektivní systém hodnocení a financování výzkumu, vývoje a inovací (IPN Metodika)
www.metodika.reformy-msmt.cz
Praha 2015