Sony external analysis FactorsWeightRatingWeighted score.docx

Sony external analysis
Factors
Weight
Rating
Weighted score
Opportunity
Further business diversification
0.1
4
0.4
New product development
0.15
4.5
0.675
Rapid Innovation
0.05
3.3
0.165
Emerging global market
0.15
4.5
0.675
Occupied share of Ericson in mobile segment
0.1
4
0.4
Threats

Low diversification
0.15
3.5
0.525
Strong competition
0.1
4
0.4
Similar products offered
0.05
3
0.15
New coming brands
0.05
3
0.15
Lower price products by other brands
0.1
4
0.4
Total
1.0
3.94

NSB305
Leading and Learning: Building Professional Capacity
ASSESSMENT 2. Building Professional Capacity.
This document contains:
• Assessment requirements.
• Detailed instructions for completing the
task.
• Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA)
Rubric that markers use to grade the
assessment task.
NSB305. Leading and Learning: Building Professional
Capacity.
NSB305 – Assessment Task 1. Page 2 of 6
Assessment Task 2.
Assessment name: Building Professional Capacity.
Task description:
Your task for this piece of assessment is to critically discuss
professional issues

and leadership challenges for the graduate registered nurse and
argue for
realistic and achievable actions and goals.
What you need to do
to prepare:
Read the TASK instructions carefully being sure that you
understand all of the key
words and directive terms.
Engage with your groups online discussion on your allocated
WIKI study group site.
(This is for all students enrolled in NSB305).
TASK STEPS.
How to write your
paper.
1. Analyse the WIKI discussion forum contributions (in relation
to self-awareness,
identity development and mentoring) and using the literature as
a point of reference,
discuss the significance of one of these professional
development strategies in relation
to transition to practice for the graduate registered nurse
(GRN).
1. 2. Drawing from national and international literature,
critically discuss the
implications of the chosen professional development strategy
for the graduate

registered nurse working in a clinical environment in relation to
achieving a work-life
balance and developing a resilient approach to practice.
3. Referring to your critical discussion in Step 2, develop 2
SMART goals (one
that aims to achieve work-life balance and the other a resilient
approach to practice).
Advocate/argue for how the realistic SMART goal actions (to
achieve a work-life
balance and a resilient approach to practice) would enhance
your transition to clinical
practice as a GRN.
Length:
1200 words +/-10%. Word length excludes in-text referencing,
your reference list,
direct quotes and appendices. Please note: markers will not
mark beyond the work limit.
Suggested (not mandatory) word count structure.
Introduction (100 words)
1.Discuss significance for the GRN (300 words)
2.Critically discuss in relation to work life balance and
resilience (400 words)
3.Advocate for realistic actions (300 words)
Conclusion (100 words)
Literature and writing
standard
requirements:
This paper needs to be:

• Written as an academic paper in 3rd person, with an
introduction, body and
conclusion.
• This is a contemporary paper, and unless you are referring to a
historical event,
literature and resources need to be within 7 years of age
• Literature must be of highest possible quality, with peer
reviewed research based
material as the preference.
• Textbooks may be used but to a maximum of 20% of your total
reference list.
• Legitimate websites such as the Nursing and Midwifery Board
of Australia may be
used also.
• Careful use of well-developed paragraphs that logically and
clearly address the task
steps and marking criteria (CRA) is essential
• There is an expectation of no grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors.
• Correct use of the QUT APA referencing style is required.
Unreferenced material cannot be accepted as credible or
accurate.
REMEMBER THIS ASSESSMENT PIECE IS ABOUT
TRANSITION TO PRACTICE
CHALLENGES AS A BEGINNING REGISTERED NURSE SO
YOUR LITERATURE
MUST REFLECT THIS.

NSB305. Leading and Learning: Building Professional
Capacity.
NSB305 – Assessment Task 1. Page 3 of 6
Format of assignment
Your assignment should be formatted and presented as follows:
• Use the provided Coversheet template with the assessment
title, your name, student
number, tutor name and word count, as a single document that
includes your paper.
• Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student
number, unit code and page
number.
• 3 cm margins on all sides, double-spaced text
• Times new roman/arial, font size 12
• QUT APA style referencing (see
http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/)
• Headings and sub-headings may be used to structure your
assignment if you prefer
• be submitted in electronic format via Turnitin.
What you need to

submit:
One word document that contains the following items:
Assignment Cover Sheet & your work in the provided template
Resources needed to
complete task:
• QUT Cite|Write APA guide.
• Turnitin Tip Sheets.
Assessment Support Engaging in the online WIKI study group
will provide you with a rich source of
discussion about the content and topic area, and an opportunity
to ask questions.
Go to Support for Learning on the Blackboard site or contact
HiQ in the library for
further advice on assessment support.
Estimated time to
complete task:
15 hours.
Weighting: 60%
Learning Outcomes
assessment.
1. Apply knowledge and skills of professionalism and strategic
leadership in the context of the role of the new graduate
registered nurse.
2. Analyse and respond effectively to complex health situations

and
promote work-life balance and resilience to enable the provision
of
holistic, person-centred care.
3. Interpret and apply strategic thinking and key skills relating
to intra-
professional and inter-professional practice including conflict
resolution,
team functioning and advanced communication.
Individual/Group: Individual
Formative/Summative: Summative
How will I be
assessed:
7-point grading scale using a rubric
Due date: Sunday 21ST OCTOBER submitted via Turnitin in
your NSB305 Blackboard site by
11.59pm. More information about Turnitin is available on the
FAQs about Turnitin page.
Academic Integrity
The School of Nursing takes academic integrity very seriously.
All work submitted must be
your own work. The work of others needs to be correctly
acknowledged and referenced
according to the APA guidelines.
There are serious consequences that will be imposed should you
be found to breach

academic integrity. Make sure you are familiar with the MOPP
C/5.3 Academic Integrity
and view the Academic Integrity video and explore the
Academic Case Studies available
on your Blackboard site.
Maintaining academic integrity is your responsibility. If in
doubt, check it carefully.
http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/
http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/cite/qutcite.jsp#apa
https://www.student.qut.edu.au/studying/learning-with-
technology/assessment/turnitin-page/turnitin
https://ask.qut.edu.au/app/answers/detail/a_id/6087/~/what-is-
turnitin%3F
https://qutvirtual4.qut.edu.au/group/staff/teaching/teaching-
with-technology/supported-technologies/online-
assessment/turnitin/frequently-asked-questions
http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/cite/qutcite.jsp
http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_03.jsp
<Insert unit code and title>
NSB305 Assessment 2. Page 4 of 6
NSB305. Assessment Task 2 Rubric
Student Name:
Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 2 and 3. Weighting: 60 %
Criteria 7 6 5 4 3 2 - 1

Analysis & knowledge
Choose 1 and
significance to
transition to practice
Weighting: 20%
GRN : graduate
registered nurse.
Discusses the
significance of your
chosen strategy in
relation to
transitioning to
practice as a GRN
with insight and
comprehensive
understanding.
The writing is well
supported by
accurately
referenced quality,
highly relevant, and
well-focused
literature that
exactly addressed
the task.
Discusses the
chosen strategy in
relation to
transitioning to

practice as a GRN from
a well-reasoned and
valid standpoint.
The writing is well
supported by
accurately referenced
highly relevant
literature, that
explicitly focuses on
the task
Discusses & describes the
chosen strategy in
relation to a GRN from a
logical and purposeful
standpoint.
Writing is supported by
referenced literature
relevant that clearly
addressed the task.
Discusses & describes the
chosen strategy in
relation to a GRN or RN
from a from a rational and
informed standpoint.
Writing is supported by
appropriate and relevant
literature that generally
supported the choice and

justification
Broadly describes the
chosen strategy in
relation to an RN.
Writing was loosely
supported with some
literature that
broadly related to the
task.
Attempted to describe
your chosen/unrelated
strategy in relation to
an RN.
Scant/ no relevant
literary support.
Comprehension and
synthesis
Weighting: 30 %
Your critical
discussion displays
evidence based
convincing clarity
and persuasive
reasoning when

considering the
implications of the
strategy on work-life
balance and
Your critical discussion
shows credible
evidence-based
reasoning when
considering the
implications of the
balance and
developing resilience
for the GRN.
Your discussion shows a
balanced and informed
evidence-based
understanding when
considering the
implications of the
balance and developing
resilience for the GRN.
Your discussion and
description show a sound
evidence-based
understanding when
considering the
implications of the
resilience for the GRN or

RN.
Your description
broadly describes an
evidence-based
understanding when
considering the
implications of the
balance and
for the RN.
Your description when
considering the
strategy in relation to
work-life balance or
for a GRN or RN is
scant, absent or
invalid and has
limited/no literary
support.

for the GRN.
Argue for realistic
action
Weighting: 30%
Your argument as to
how your SMART goals
enable realistic action
to achieve work-life
resilience is insightful
and explicit and relates
specifically to the GRN.
The writing is informed
by a wide range of
literature that is highly
valid, defining and
authoritative.
Your argument as to how
your SMART goals enable
realistic action to achieve
work-life balance and
developing resilience is
logical and perceptive
and relates specifically to
the GRN. The writing is
insightful and informed
by a range of credible
literature and synthesis

of concepts.
your SMART goals would
realistically action and
achieve work-life balance
and developing resilience is
well considered and relates
closely to the GRN. The
writing is perceptive and
informed by literature that
is valid and purposeful.
your SMART goals will enable
work-life balance and
develop resilience is
informed by literature that
relates generally to the GRN
and/or RN but would be
difficult to action.
The writing is informed by
synthesis of ideas that
supports sound and relevant
ideas related to the task.
Your argument as to
how your SMART goals
will enable work-life
balance and/or
developing resilience is
informed by a broad
understanding of the
topic, but generally your
actions are not realistic

for the beginning
nursing professional.
Your paper inadequately
attempts to/or does not
describe realistic
strategies to enhance
conflict resolution or
team cohesion. There is
little or no supportive
demonstration of
understanding about the
topic or the task.
Presentation
Task Structure
Literary Expression
Referencing Style
Weighting: 20%
Your introduction
positions the reader
with a clear & explicit
understanding of the
task with a logical flow
between paragraphs.
The conclusion is
decisive and relates
clearly and specifically
to the task showing
originality and inspired
thinking. No
presentation errors.

English expression is
succinct and
nondiscriminatory
showing a
sophisticated use of
terminology and
professional language
that is engaging and
cohesive & written in
Your introduction
concisely and clearly
introduces the task with
section flowing well
between and within the
paragraphs. The
conclusion is insightful
and justified from the
body and the topic of the
paper. One presentation
error only.
concise, definite and
nondiscriminatory, with
an effective use of
terminology and
professional language
that extends thinking and
written in the correct
genres. There are minor
grammatical, spelling
Your introduction is useful
to direct the reader’s
attention to the topic and

the paper. Each section
addresses the task and
shows a logical progression
of reasoning. The
conclusion relates to the
topic with an attempt to
make purposeful
comments. Two or three
presentation errors.
English expression is clear
and unambiguous with a
reasonable use of
terminology and
professional language that
is informative and relevant
to the nursing discipline.
There are a few (3 or 4)
Your introduction offers
basic preparation for the
paper and task. Each section
of the paper is
understandable and
generally addresses the task.
The conclusion is a general
statement of fact drawn
from the paper. Up to 5
presentation and 5
grammatical errors. The
paper is minorly outside the
stated word limit.
understandable,

nondiscriminatory and
functional with some
attempts to use correct
terminology and professional
language that is relevant to
An introduction and
conclusion was
attempted and each
section of the paper
was evident.
Sentence/paragraph
construction was
limited and broadly
reflected the task. The
paper is outside the
stated word limit.
Greater than 5
presentation errors and
5 grammatical errors.
There is evidence of
more than one
referencing style with
many technical errors
A rudimentary attempt
with no clear framework
to the paper. The paper
is well outside the stated
word limit. Greater than
10 presentation errors
and 10 grammatical
errors. Referencing style
is generally inaccurate
with consistent technical

errors and omissions
the correct genres.
There are no
and/or errors in
punctuation and
syntax.
There is evidence of a
single referencing style
with no errors.
and/or errors in
punctuation and syntax.
There is evidence of a
single referencing style
with minor technical
errors but correct
application.
and/or errors in
punctuation and syntax.
There is evidence of a single
referencing style with a few

consistent technical errors
but correct application.
the nursing discipline. There
are
There is evidence of a single
referencing style with
multiple technical errors
with an effort for correct
application.
Running head: THE APPLE COMPUTER COMPANY 1
THE APPLE COMPUTER COMPANY 4
Strengths and Weaknesses of Apple Company
Factors
Strengths Weight Rating
W. Score
i. They are easy to access in the markets 0.19 4.9
0.1
ii. The Profit is consistent 0.20 3.9
0.4
iii. Rate to offer the service ensures point to point 0.02 4.0
0.6
iv. High affinity of the partnership 0.10 5.0
0.8
v. High quality of the product 0.02 2.8
0.12
Weaknesses
i. High competition from other similar services 0.12 2.5
0.81
ii. High price rates to access 0.21 3.0
0.65

iii. Unfamiliarity to the products 0.11 2.9
0.80
iv. Low demand of the products 0.03 2.4
0.9
Total 1 31.4 5.18
Comments
Apple computers’ Company is able to ensure the
consistency of the prices and the fairness of the affordability to
the clients. In relation to the functionality of the products, there
is the access of the commodities to have the efforts in liaising
with the operations in ease to have the best quality of the
products desired by the customers who perform the purchase of
the products. In relation to the quality, which is quite
commendable by most of the members assures the best of the
relations to effect the entire development of the company.
The Apple Company has to ensure the standardization of
access to the customers to ease the stiff competition of their
production and service to the customers. It is due to the high
rate of other different computer companies that assure the
different prices and accessible prices to the members to ensure
the same service that are produced by the apple company are as
well delivered with the cheaper prices. In relation to the
acquiring state of the other devices like the HP, Lenovo and the
Acer among other different ones. The difference ensures the
best and accessible commodities to everyone in the right desire
to have the relative accommodation and satisfaction.
Adidas TOWS MATRIX
Internal Factors (from IFAS)
External Factors (from EFAS)
Strengths (S)
S1 Global audience and established market leader
S2 Worldwide range of suppliers Full-time faculty

S3 Good range and quality of products MIS Department
S4 Strong Market
S5 Shoes of all ages
Weaknesses (W)
W1 Reliance on cheap labour
W2 High production cost
W3 Strong focus on footwear
W4 High product prices
W5 Poor history regarding social and ethical issues
Opportunities (O)
O1 Growing preference to shop online
O2 Increase in shoes sales
O3 Potential for new technology
O4 increase in sports activities
O5 Increased sports initiatives
S / O Strategies
· Continue developing technology
· Increase partnership strategies and marketing intermediaries
· Migrate customers to the web strategy
W / O Strategies
· Lower production cost
· Use the Olympics and sporting events to represent themselves
· Create a wider range of products
Threats (T)
T1 Increased competition

T2 Counterfeit products
T3 Ever changing market
T4 increase labor cost
T5 Recession
S / T Strategies
· Expand their range of suppliers to keep the cost low
· Constantly create new designs and ideas
· Search for innovative concepts to outcompete their
competition
W / T Strategies
· Keep their competitive advantage by using customization and
expand by some means.
· Target different segments of the market in order to increase
market share and halt competition

Sony external analysis FactorsWeightRatingWeighted score.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Sony external analysis FactorsWeightRatingWeighted score.docx

Similar to Sony external analysis FactorsWeightRatingWeighted score.docx (6)

More from williame8

More from williame8 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Sony external analysis FactorsWeightRatingWeighted score.docx