'Don’t affect the share price': social media policy in HE as reputation management
1. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Title
'Don't affect the share
price':
Social media policy in higher education as
reputation management
2. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Introduction
Introduction
•analysis of social media policies from 14
UK HEIs
•policy text analysis
•what do these policy texts reveal about
UK HE?
3. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Introduction
There are said to be certain Buddhists
whose ascetic practices enable them to
see a whole landscape in a bean.
(Barthes 1974: p.3)
4. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
My main points
My main points
•enhance brand/protect reputation
•blur
lines between corporate
communication and L&T advice
•marketing- rather than pedagogy-driven
•more about control than guidance
•‘new managerialism’ (Deem 1998)
5. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
What is social media ?
Social media and brand building
6. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Social media: easy to get wrong
7. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Getting social media wrong 1
Getting social media wrong 1
8. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Getting social media wrong 2
Getting social media wrong 2
9. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Some replies
Some replies …
10. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Some replies
Some more replies …
11. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
The Ringmar Affair
The Ringmar affair
My mistake was to use the freedom of speech
to discuss the institution itself – the LSE and
English academia. Freedom of speech is fine
[…] but only as long as speaking freely did not
deter prospective students from applying. In
an era of commercialized education, the limits
to freedom of speech are set by the market.
(Ringmar 2007: 44)
12. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Don’t affect the share price
Don’t affect the share price?
The simple rule for everyone should be
don't affect the share price, no matter what
technology you are using.
Derek Morrison
Associate Head of e-Learning, HEA
13. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
My questions
My questions
•Who was responsible for creating policy?
•Did this inform policy aims and language?
•What are the policy aims?
•What is the rationale for the policy?
•What are the policy ‘levers’?
14. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Methodology
Methodology?
•Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) the
‘inspiration’
•‘“critical” implies showing connections and
causes that are hidden’ (Fairclough 1992:
9)
15. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
My corpus of policy
texts
My corpus of policy texts
•convenience sampling
•purposive, nonprobability sampling?
England, Scotland and Wales
chartered in C19th (Durham)
red brick (Bristol)
plate glass (Essex)
post ‘92 (LJMU)
16. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
q. 1: who created policy?
17. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Location of policy
Location of policy
Marketing (7/14) HR (3/14) Other (4/14)
Aberystwyth University University of Central Heriot Watt University
Lancashire
University College London Durham University University of Essex
University of Glamorgan University of Surrey Open University
University of Huddersfield Robert Gordon University
University of Leicester
Liverpool John Moores
University
Oxford Brookes University
18. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
q. 2: does this inform policy?
19. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Example from marketing
Example from marketing
It is important to be mindful that we may
attract negative as well as positive comments.
Correct handling of such comments can serve
to promote LJMU as a responsive, helpful
organisation that aims for high levels of
customer service [emphasis mine].
Liverpool John Moores University
20. Example from HR
Example from HR department
An individual is free to talk about the
University. However instances where the
University is brought into disrepute may
constitute misconduct or gross misconduct
and disciplinary action will be applied
[emphasis mine].
University of Surrey
21. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
University of Essex
University of Essex policy
•to encourage good practice
•to protect the University, its staff and students
•to clarify where and how existing policies and
guidelines apply to social media
•to promote effective and innovative use of
social media as part of the University's
activities
22. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
q. 3: What is the rationale?
23. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Brand management 1
Brand management 1
Social media presents an opportunity but
also a challenge for brand and reputation
management [emphasis mine].
University of Leicester
24. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Brand management 2
Brand management 2
An organisation’s brand is moving from being
what it says it is on its website or in its adverts
and brochures to being what its customers (or
those who have experienced the company) say
it is and tell other people it is. Frequently the
arena for these conversations comprises […]
social media tools and technologies …
Open University
25. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Control of messages
Control of messages
It is important […] that OU engagement is
undertaken with a common voice
[emphasis mine] and does not contribute a
plurality of, or conflicting, messages.
Open University
26. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
q. 4: what are the policy aims?
27. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Promote and protect
Promote and protect
The purpose of the social media policy is
to promote the interests [emphasis mine]
of the University of Glamorgan within the
realms of social media whilst protecting
the integrity of the University [emphasis
mine] ...
University of Glamorgan
28. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Reputation
management 1
Reputation management 1
The purpose of this guidance is to protect
the reputation [emphasis mine] of
employees of Durham University and the
University as a whole from abuse via staff
usage of social networking and personal
internet sites.
Durham University
29. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Reputation
management 2
Reputation management 2
In order to promote student and staff
safety and reduce legal, operational,
financial and reputational risk [emphasis
mine] to the University, all staff who use
Web 2.0 services are responsible for
compliance with this policy.
Heriot-Watt University
30. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
q. 5: what are the policy levers?
31. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Disciplinary action 1
Disciplinary action 1
… you are free to talk about UCLan on your
site. However, you must avoid bringing the
University into disrepute in any way, as this
may constitute gross misconduct as listed in
the Disciplinary Procedure in the staff
handbook.
University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN)
32. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Disciplinary action 2
Disciplinary action 2
Anybody is free to talk about the University on
social media sites. However, please be aware
that disparaging or untrue remarks which may
bring the University, its staff or students into
disrepute may constitute misconduct and
disciplinary action may be applied.
University of Huddersfield
33. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Disciplinary action 3
Disciplinary action 3
Staff whose use of Web 2.0 services, whether
for work or private use, exposes the
University to risk of legal liability, operational,
financial or reputational loss may be subject
to disciplinary sanctions.
Heriot-Watt University
34. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Social media users register
1
Social media users register 1
If you already have a social networking site or
intend to initiate one which indicates in any
way that you work at UCLan you should inform
your manager.
University of Central Lancashire
35. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Social media users register 2
Social media users register 2
All proposals to establish new social media
presences related to learning and teaching,
with an anticipated life-span of under 4
months, must be submitted to the Social
Media Officer and where necessary reviewed
by the Social Media Group.
Aberystwyth University
36. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Social media users register 3
Social media users register 3
All new accounts to be set up on social
media sites including (but not exclusive to)
Facebook, Flickr, Twitter and YouTube,
should be approved by the Web Team before
they are created. […]. Links from
www.glam.ac.uk to unapproved Facebook or
Twitter accounts will be removed.
University of Glamorgan
37. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Social media users register 4
Social media users register 4
In particular any official University social
networking site/group must be approved by
the University's Social Media Overview
Group. A central record will be kept of all
approved sites.
University of Essex
38. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Social media users register
5
Social media users register 5
Get in touch with us! Let us know what
you've set up: we'll add you to the list of UCL
social media users on this site, and also try to
keep you up to date with central social media
developments.
University College London
39. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Conclusion
Conclusion
•alternative title: the presentation of
universities in everyday life
•Erving Goffman (1959)
•‘impression management’ – ‘front stage’
•messy business of disagreement kept
‘backstage’
40. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
The way forward
The way forward?
•less fear and defensiveness
•a more ‘light touch’ approach
•cross-departmental/faculty collaboration
•close involvement of students and academic
staff
41. Tony McNeill, Principal Lecturer in Educational Technology I 12 September 2012
Robert Gordon University
Robert Gordon University
Editor's Notes
This paper offers an analysis of the social media policies of 14 universities in the United Kingdom. It is not a study of implementation and does not draw on interview data from those responsible for writing policy. Its focus is primarily on policy texts and what the discourse of those texts might be said to reveal about the state of higher education in the UK. What are the tensions, conflicts or faultlines in HE?
There are said to be certain Buddhists whose ascetic practices enable them to see a whole landscape in a bean. (Barthes 1974: p.3) References Barthes, R. (1974) S/Z. New York: Hill and Wang.
I will argue that, starting from around 2009, a number of universities have developed social media policies that, whilst providing some level of staff guidance, are mainly about enhancing university ‘brands’ and protecting institutional reputation. I will argue that social media policy appears to be less informed by an awareness of implications for learning made possible by new forms of digital culture and is more informed by the discourse of marketisation and ‘new managerialism’. Although many of the social media policies are appropriate for the purposes of corporate communication, they are, at best, problematic when applied to the messier business of learning, teaching and assessment. At worst, some of the social media policies analysed place serious constraints on academic autonomy and the possibilities for innovation, openness and sharing.
Social media offers users lower tech thresholds. However, with ease of posting + growing concern about institutional reputation = need for policy. Perceived need for social media policy is therefore the result of combination of both the political/ideological process we call marketization and the technological development of the read/write web.
Ringmar, E. (2007). A Blogger’s Manifesto: Free Speech and Censorship in the Age of the Internet . London: Anthem
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press, Cambridge.
My sample corpus is derived from the 14 social media policies currently available online that I was able to locate between early October 2011 and late May 2012. My search involved typing in a number of search strings – e.g. ‘social media policy HE’, ‘Web 2.0 policy HE’, ‘social networking policy HE’ – into the Google search engine and following up the relevant search results. I also used my main Twitter account to tweet a request for information on and links to social media policy documents from UK-based HEIs. I found 13 of the 14 policies as a result of using a search engine and just one additional new policy (in addition to two duplicates) as a result of the tweeted request. By chance rather than by design, my convenience sampling has the appearance of purposive, nonprobability sampling (Ritchie & Lewis 2003, pp.77-108) insofar as the 14 institutions with publicly-accessible policy documents represent a broad cross-section of the different types of university in the UK: those chartered in the 19th century (e.g. University of Durham) through to ‘red brick’ (e.g. University of Bristol), plate glass (e.g. University of Essex) and ‘new’ or ‘post-’92’ universities (e.g. University of Central Lancashire). I was not able to locate any social media policy documents from an ‘ancient’ university such as the University of Oxford or the University of Edinburgh so the sample cannot be said to be wholly representative of the HE sector in the UK. Although it may be the case that these institutions have social media policies that are accessible only to staff, it would be interesting to conduct further research into the apparent absence of social media policies from ‘ancient’ universities – in the main elite institutions – with a view to exploring the degree to which they feel they do not require the sort of ‘brand management’ other universities do. Having selected a corpus of texts, I was interested in discovering which department had responsibility for producing the policy, what the stated purposes of the policy were, whose interests were being protected and the degree to which policy had been ‘colonized’, as it were, by the discourse of marketisation.
Other: Heriot-Watt: The Web Team - http://www.hw.ac.uk/webteam.htm University of Essex: Digital Media - http://www.essex.ac.uk/digital_media/policy.aspx Open University – eBusiness/digital engagement team - http://www8.open.ac.uk/about/ebusiness/ Robert Gordon University: LiveWire - http://www.rgu.ac.uk/staff/administration-and-professional-departments/who-s-who
Liverpool John Moores University http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/corporatecommunications/102249.htm
Open University http://www8.open.ac.uk/about/ebusiness/files/ebusiness/file/ecms/web-content/ou-social-media-position.pdf
Open University http://www8.open.ac.uk/about/ebusiness/files/ebusiness/file/ecms/web-content/ou-social-media-position.pdf
Open University http://www8.open.ac.uk/about/ebusiness/files/ebusiness/file/ecms/web-content/ou-social-media-position.pdf
Open University http://www8.open.ac.uk/about/ebusiness/files/ebusiness/file/ecms/web-content/ou-social-media-position.pdf
University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) http://www.uclan.ac.uk/information/services/hr/hr_guidance_employees/social_networking.php
University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) http://www.uclan.ac.uk/information/services/hr/hr_guidance_employees/social_networking.php
University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) http://www.uclan.ac.uk/information/services/hr/hr_guidance_employees/social_networking.php
University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) http://www.uclan.ac.uk/information/services/hr/hr_guidance_employees/social_networking.php
Aberystwyth University http://www.aber.ac.uk/en/media/social-media-policy-by-Russ.pdf
University of Glamorgan http://msr.glam.ac.uk/documents/download/52/
University of Essex http://www.essex.ac.uk/digital_media/policy.aspx
University College London (UCL) http://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-media/
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , Doubleday. New York.
Robert Gordon University http://www.rgu.ac.uk/staff/administration-and-professional-departments/livewire/social-media-toolkit