From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington DC - Melissa Wadman and Darren Milligan talk about how the Smithsonian is using LRMI to combat the current chaotic organizational state of its educational resources.
This document provides background information on the Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI). It discusses the goals of LRMI, which are to make it easier to find learning resources that meet student and classroom needs. It outlines the key LRMI properties for describing educational resources, such as title, description, subject area, intended age range, and how the resource aligns with educational frameworks. The document also summarizes recent developments with LRMI, such as publisher adoption increasing from 47% to 86%. It notes implications of LRMI include improving discovery of resources and supporting new business models in educational content.
The document discusses how various elements of education, including assessments, professional development, data, curriculum/content, and technology are interconnected and influence each other, like objects floating on a waterbed. It provides examples of several major initiatives focused on creating common standards and interoperability for sharing assessment, student, and other education-related data between different systems. The document recommends developing a long-term vision and roadmap for interoperability, addressing privacy/security concerns, and involving vendors in discussions of standards.
This document discusses tagging learning resources with metadata standards like LRMI. It describes Knovation's role in coordinating with LRMI and supporting accessibility metadata. It also outlines promises that a unified LRMI standard brings, such as streamlined tagging and stimulating innovation around resource quality. Examples are provided for how LRMI could be used to tag educational alignments between resources and standards at varying levels of granularity.
Brandt Redd of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation discussed the Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) and how it realtes to other major education projects including the Shared Learning Collaborative, Learning Registry, etc.
The document describes the EducationalAlignment object which is used to describe alignments between learning resources and nodes in educational frameworks. It provides examples of alignments to standards like Common Core State Standards and frameworks like the Library of Congress Classification system. The EducationalAlignment object has properties like alignmentType, targetUrl, targetName, and educationalFramework to specify the relationship between a learning resource and a taxonomy.
Jack Buckley, Commissioner for the National Center for Education Statistics, presented at the Content in Context Metadata Lab on the work the U.S. Department of Education has done on the Common Education Data Standards.
This document provides background information on the Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI). It discusses the goals of LRMI, which are to make it easier to find learning resources that meet student and classroom needs. It outlines the key LRMI properties for describing educational resources, such as title, description, subject area, intended age range, and how the resource aligns with educational frameworks. The document also summarizes recent developments with LRMI, such as publisher adoption increasing from 47% to 86%. It notes implications of LRMI include improving discovery of resources and supporting new business models in educational content.
The document discusses how various elements of education, including assessments, professional development, data, curriculum/content, and technology are interconnected and influence each other, like objects floating on a waterbed. It provides examples of several major initiatives focused on creating common standards and interoperability for sharing assessment, student, and other education-related data between different systems. The document recommends developing a long-term vision and roadmap for interoperability, addressing privacy/security concerns, and involving vendors in discussions of standards.
This document discusses tagging learning resources with metadata standards like LRMI. It describes Knovation's role in coordinating with LRMI and supporting accessibility metadata. It also outlines promises that a unified LRMI standard brings, such as streamlined tagging and stimulating innovation around resource quality. Examples are provided for how LRMI could be used to tag educational alignments between resources and standards at varying levels of granularity.
Brandt Redd of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation discussed the Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) and how it realtes to other major education projects including the Shared Learning Collaborative, Learning Registry, etc.
The document describes the EducationalAlignment object which is used to describe alignments between learning resources and nodes in educational frameworks. It provides examples of alignments to standards like Common Core State Standards and frameworks like the Library of Congress Classification system. The EducationalAlignment object has properties like alignmentType, targetUrl, targetName, and educationalFramework to specify the relationship between a learning resource and a taxonomy.
Jack Buckley, Commissioner for the National Center for Education Statistics, presented at the Content in Context Metadata Lab on the work the U.S. Department of Education has done on the Common Education Data Standards.
The document discusses three standards for publishing assessment content: Question and Test Interoperability (QTI), which aims to provide portability of assessment content and related data across different systems and is currently in version 2.1; Accessible Portable Item Protocol (APIP), which extends QTI and AfA standards to address accessibility concerns in assessments and is currently version 1.0; and provides information on how to get involved by attending IMS Global meetings or following the specifications online.
This document discusses data privacy standards and challenges. It outlines four common types of privacy threats: data security breaches, access beyond need-to-know, digital footprints, and commercial use of data. Several key federal privacy laws are mentioned, including FERPA, COPPA, and HIPAA. Statistics are provided showing a large number of student data privacy bills proposed and new laws passed in recent years. A draft of the Student Digital Privacy and Parental Rights Act of 2015 is summarized, which would prohibit certain data practices and require more transparency from ed-tech companies regarding data collection and sharing.
This document discusses the transfer of stewardship of the Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) specification from Creative Commons and others to the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). It outlines the LRMI Task Group's plans to formalize the LRMI schema, develop machine-readable vocabularies, improve documentation for implementers, and provide guidance on best practices for using LRMI in educational applications and aligning closed systems with the open web.
This document discusses using education metadata standards like LRMI (Learning Resource Metadata Initiative) to make instructional resources more discoverable. It provides an overview of the LRMI fields of metadata like general information, education specifics, alignments to standards, and examples of how resources can be tagged. Attendees participated in a hands-on activity to tag sample resources using LRMI fields in order to make the content more searchable based on criteria like standards, age, and type. Questions from educators are addressed, and how publishers and organizations can get involved with the metadata standards is discussed.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Barbra Bard Sperling gives an overview of MERLOT, a metadata registry for open educational resources.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Michelle Brennan from ISKME describes the work they've done around incorporating LRMI metadata into OER Commons.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Thor Prichard of Clarity Innovations discusses the work his team is doing around building private sandbox nodes on the Learning Registry for content developers to test the tagging, publishing searching lifecycle.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Maggie Jacobs from the New York Public Library discusses their plans for using LRMI to organize their educational resources much like the Smithsonian.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Pearson's Marlowe Johnson discusses how the conversation around metadata within Pearson has changed, and how they use metadata to support their strategic focus on efficacy.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - David Grandison from BrainPOP discusses why and how they've implemented LRMI metadata and the results they've seen since, including an increase in Google referrals from 12% to 40%.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Knovation's Steve Nordmark discusses what he and his team has learned over the past 14 years they've spent contextualizing educational resources.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Brian Ausland from Navigation North explains how the tools they are building around Learning Registry technology will help users publish/manage to the registry and access/customize data as it's pulled out.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Elizabeth Neuman from the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction explains her state's plans for building a digital learning portal for all Wisconsin school districts.
ISLE Open Education Resources Enabling Open Access and Integration | Educatio...AAP PreK-12 Learning Group
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Jeanne Kitchens discusses how Illinois has taken advantage of the LRMI and Learning Reigstry in building their Illinois Shared Learning Environment.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Randy Reina from Intel discusses the importance of standards for fostering a successful education marketplace.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Dave Gladney & Michael Jay introduce the event and give a brief background on education metadata and why it's important.
The document discusses three standards for publishing assessment content: Question and Test Interoperability (QTI), which aims to provide portability of assessment content and related data across different systems and is currently in version 2.1; Accessible Portable Item Protocol (APIP), which extends QTI and AfA standards to address accessibility concerns in assessments and is currently version 1.0; and provides information on how to get involved by attending IMS Global meetings or following the specifications online.
This document discusses data privacy standards and challenges. It outlines four common types of privacy threats: data security breaches, access beyond need-to-know, digital footprints, and commercial use of data. Several key federal privacy laws are mentioned, including FERPA, COPPA, and HIPAA. Statistics are provided showing a large number of student data privacy bills proposed and new laws passed in recent years. A draft of the Student Digital Privacy and Parental Rights Act of 2015 is summarized, which would prohibit certain data practices and require more transparency from ed-tech companies regarding data collection and sharing.
This document discusses the transfer of stewardship of the Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) specification from Creative Commons and others to the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). It outlines the LRMI Task Group's plans to formalize the LRMI schema, develop machine-readable vocabularies, improve documentation for implementers, and provide guidance on best practices for using LRMI in educational applications and aligning closed systems with the open web.
This document discusses using education metadata standards like LRMI (Learning Resource Metadata Initiative) to make instructional resources more discoverable. It provides an overview of the LRMI fields of metadata like general information, education specifics, alignments to standards, and examples of how resources can be tagged. Attendees participated in a hands-on activity to tag sample resources using LRMI fields in order to make the content more searchable based on criteria like standards, age, and type. Questions from educators are addressed, and how publishers and organizations can get involved with the metadata standards is discussed.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Barbra Bard Sperling gives an overview of MERLOT, a metadata registry for open educational resources.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Michelle Brennan from ISKME describes the work they've done around incorporating LRMI metadata into OER Commons.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Thor Prichard of Clarity Innovations discusses the work his team is doing around building private sandbox nodes on the Learning Registry for content developers to test the tagging, publishing searching lifecycle.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Maggie Jacobs from the New York Public Library discusses their plans for using LRMI to organize their educational resources much like the Smithsonian.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Pearson's Marlowe Johnson discusses how the conversation around metadata within Pearson has changed, and how they use metadata to support their strategic focus on efficacy.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - David Grandison from BrainPOP discusses why and how they've implemented LRMI metadata and the results they've seen since, including an increase in Google referrals from 12% to 40%.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Knovation's Steve Nordmark discusses what he and his team has learned over the past 14 years they've spent contextualizing educational resources.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Brian Ausland from Navigation North explains how the tools they are building around Learning Registry technology will help users publish/manage to the registry and access/customize data as it's pulled out.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Elizabeth Neuman from the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction explains her state's plans for building a digital learning portal for all Wisconsin school districts.
ISLE Open Education Resources Enabling Open Access and Integration | Educatio...AAP PreK-12 Learning Group
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Jeanne Kitchens discusses how Illinois has taken advantage of the LRMI and Learning Reigstry in building their Illinois Shared Learning Environment.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Randy Reina from Intel discusses the importance of standards for fostering a successful education marketplace.
From the Education Metadata Meetup on 7/30/14 in Washington, DC - Dave Gladney & Michael Jay introduce the event and give a brief background on education metadata and why it's important.
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17Celine George
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.pptHenry Hollis
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
Smithsonian Show & Tell | Education Metadata Meetup
1. Education Metadata Meetup
Show and Tell: Institutions
Washington DC
July 30, 2014
#metadataMU
#LRMI
Darren Milligan
Senior Digital Strategist
Smithsonian Institution, Center for Learning and Digital Access
milligand@si.edu
@darrenmilligan
Melissa Wadman
Manager of Program Evaluation
Smithsonian Institution, Center for Learning and Digital Access
wadmanm@si.edu
@melissawadman
7. 1995
23.6 million physical visits to museums
72,942 digital visits
2013
30 million physical visits to museums
140 million digital visits
8. 1995
23.6 million physical visits to museums
72,942 digital visits
2013
30 million physical visits to museums
140 million digital visits
Physical: 30,000,000-23,600,000 /
23,600,000 X 100 = 27.12% increase
Digital: 140,000,000-72,942 / 72,942 X
100 = 191,833.32% increase
9. 1995
23.6 million physical visits to museums
72,942 digital visits
2013
30 million physical visits to museums
140 million digital visits
Physical: 30,000,000-23,600,000 /
23,600,000 X 100 = 27.12% increase
Digital: 140,000,000-72,942 / 72,942 X
100 = 191,833.32% increase
10. Why Internet for Edu. ( Everything) ?
Reporting
Year
Smithsonian
Non-Digital
Visitors
(in millions)
Smithsonian
Digital Visitors
(in millions)
Global
Population
using Internet
(% of
population)
Developed
World using
Internet
(% of
population)
1995
23.6
0.1
<2
<11
2005
24.0
59.3
16
51
2010
30.2
97.2
30
67
2013
30.0
140.0
39
77
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19. Pew Research Teachers Survey Report
February 2013
92%: Internet has “major impact” on their ability to
access content, resources, and materials for their
teaching
90%: use search engines to find info
84%: use Internet weekly to find content that will
engage students
80%: use Internet weekly to help them create
lessons
20. based
on
The
Content
Developers
Guide
to
the
Learning
Resource
Metadata
Ini;a;ve
and
Learning
Registry,
2013
24. Thanks!
Education Metadata Meetup
Show and Tell: Institutions
Washington DC
July 30, 2014
#metadataMU
#LRMI
Darren Milligan
Senior Digital Strategist
Smithsonian Institution, Center for Learning and Digital Access
milligand@si.edu
@darrenmilligan
Melissa Wadman
Manager of Program Evaluation
Smithsonian Institution, Center for Learning and Digital Access
wadmanm@si.edu
@melissawadman