Smart Mobility: a Dutch Reality - Robbert Verweij - October 2018
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•522 views
This document summarizes the Dutch government's policy on smart mobility and automated vehicles. The minister's focus is on stimulating existing safety systems, responsible introduction of new automated vehicles through regulations, maintaining future-proof infrastructure, and carefully handling data exchange. The document also notes some of the non-technical challenges for policymakers regarding automated vehicles, such as ethics, societal support, innovation cycles, impacts on jobs and traffic, and balancing innovation with road safety.
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Smart Mobility: a Dutch Reality - Robbert Verweij - October 2018
Similar to Smart Mobility: a Dutch Reality - Robbert Verweij - October 2018 (20)
More from Euro NCAP
More from Euro NCAP (9)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Smart Mobility: a Dutch Reality - Robbert Verweij - October 2018
- 1. Smart Mobility: A Dutch Reality A policy point of view Robbert Verweij Road safety section 24 October 2018
- 2. Challenges in technological developments 2 24 October 2018Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment
- 3. Challenges in technological developments 3 24 October 2018Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment
- 4. Challenges in technological developments 4 24 October 2018Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment
- 5. Ministerial focus: 5 24 October 2018Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment
- 6. Letter to parliament: Dutch Reality 1. Stimulate use of existing safety-proven ADAS-systems 2. Responsible introduction of new generation vehicles (UN- regulation, EU, NCAP) 3. Futureproof infrastructure and maintainance 4. Careful benefit of data-exchange and connectivity. 6 24 October 2018Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment
- 7. 1) using the systems 7 Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment 24 October 2018
- 8. 2) approval of systems 8 Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment 24 October 2018
- 9. 3) Future proof infra (learning by doing) 9 Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment 24 October 2018
- 10. 4) Data, curse or blessing? 10 Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment 24 October 2018
- 11. Automated vehicles... The non-technical stuff that really gives policy makers a headache... 11 Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment 24 October 2018 • Who is the boss in the car? -> Ethics • Why don’t people buy the stuff? -> Societal support • Hurry up, what’s the problem? -> Gardner Hype Cycle • Does this generate social benefits or cost jobs? -> Societal benefits. • Can my mother still use her oldmobile? -> Mixed traffic. • Innovation vs road safety -> risc assessment. • Etc etc.
- 12. 1210 maart 2011 For more information: Robbert.Verweij@minienm.nl
Editor's Notes
- Cars will change more the coming 10 years then the last 100 years.
- Technically, these are support systems and hence always operated under the legislative radar... Whereas emenrgency functions always were bound to rules.
- Conclusion: the car may control your window-wipers, your light-switch, your radio, climate, satnav, even your steering wheels and your gaspedal/break ... But ...Formally there is no transfer of control. You remain responsible.
- Goals is NOT automated driving! Goals are safe, clean and flowing traffic.
- How to inform drivers on these new systems? Know that these systems exist (in your car, on your phone, etc) Know how to use them safely.
- New ways of approving technical systems. Not through technical demands but through driving exam-experiences?
- All of us (OEMs, examiners and legislators alike) are learning by doing in this field. Joining forces is needed to improve the (now imperfect) systems, and to improve the (now imperfect) legislation. We foresee short term introduction of 3 use-cases Pods (people movers at low speed without driver in vehicle) Truck platoons Highway autopilots The last use case is the most relevant for CIECA (for now).
- All of us (OEMs, examiners and legislators alike) are learning by doing in this field. Joining forces is needed to improve the (now imperfect) systems, and to improve the (now imperfect) legislation. We foresee short term introduction of 3 use-cases Pods (people movers at low speed without driver in vehicle) Truck platoons Highway autopilots The last use case is the most relevant for CIECA (for now).
- Driving task increasing using ADAS level 2? If so, has the driving task increased so much that addition demands are needed? Or are these just comfort systems, used at own risk? If so, what do we do at level 3 and higher, where TOC is relevant? Can drivers do other tasks?
- We look forward to meeting you!