Skagit County, Washington, has agreed to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules. Skagit County agreed to a $215,000 monetary settlement and to work closely with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to correct deficiencies in its HIPAA compliance program. Skagit County is located in Northwest Washington, and is home to approximately 118,000 residents. The Skagit County Public Health Department provides essential services to many individuals who would otherwise not be able to afford health care.
OCR opened an investigation of Skagit County upon receiving a breach report that money receipts with electronic protected health information (ePHI) of seven individuals were accessed by unknown parties after the ePHI had been inadvertently moved to a publicly accessible server maintained by the County. OCR's investigation revealed a broader exposure of protected health information involved in the incident, which included the ePHI of 1,581 individuals. Many of the accessible files involved sensitive information, including protected health information concerning the testing and treatment of infectious diseases. OCR's investigation further uncovered general and widespread non-compliance by Skagit County with the HIPAA Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules.
Skagit County continues to cooperate with OCR through a corrective action plan to ensure it has in place written policies and procedures, documentation requirements, training, and other measures to comply with the HIPAA Rules. This corrective action plan also requires Skagit County to provide regular status reports to OCR.
OCR opened a compliance review of Concentra Health Services (Concentra) upon receiving a breach report that an unencrypted laptop was stolen from one of its facilities, the Springfield Missouri Physical Therapy Center. OCR’s investigation revealed that Concentra had previously recognized in multiple risk analyses that a lack of encryption on its laptops, desktop computers, medical equipment, tablets and other devices containing electronic protected health information (ePHI) was a critical risk. While steps were taken to begin encryption, Concentra’s efforts were incomplete and inconsistent over time leaving patient PHI vulnerable throughout the organization. OCR’s investigation further found Concentra had insufficient security management processes in place to safeguard patient information. Concentra has agreed to pay OCR $1,725,220 to settle potential violations and will adopt a corrective action plan to evidence their remediation of these findings.
OCR received a breach notice in February 2012 from QCA Health Plan, Inc. of Arkansas reporting that an unencrypted laptop computer containing the ePHI of 148 individuals was stolen from a workforce member’s car. While QCA encrypted their devices following discovery of the breach, OCR’s investigation revealed that QCA failed to comply with multiple requirements of the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules, beginning from the compliance date of the Security Rule in April 2005 and ending in June 2012. QCA agreed to a $250,000 monetary settlement and is required to provide HHS with an updated risk analysis and corresponding risk management plan that includes specific security measures to reduce the risks to and vulnerabilities of its ePHI. QCA is also required to retrain its workforce and document its ongoing compliance efforts.
Catholic Health Care Services Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action PlanAlex Slaney
Catholic Health Care Services of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia settlement, Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan as a result of violating the HIPAA Security Rule for ePHI
Resolution Agreement: On January 6, 2012, HHS notified SRMC of its initiation of a compliance review of its facility to determine whether there was a failure to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Rule. HHS’s compliance review was prompted by an article in the Los Angeles Times published on January 4, 2012. The article indicated that two of SRMC’s senior leaders met with the media to discuss the medical services provided to a patient (the Affected Party) without a valid written authorization.
OCR opened a compliance review of Concentra Health Services (Concentra) upon receiving a breach report that an unencrypted laptop was stolen from one of its facilities, the Springfield Missouri Physical Therapy Center. OCR’s investigation revealed that Concentra had previously recognized in multiple risk analyses that a lack of encryption on its laptops, desktop computers, medical equipment, tablets and other devices containing electronic protected health information (ePHI) was a critical risk. While steps were taken to begin encryption, Concentra’s efforts were incomplete and inconsistent over time leaving patient PHI vulnerable throughout the organization. OCR’s investigation further found Concentra had insufficient security management processes in place to safeguard patient information. Concentra has agreed to pay OCR $1,725,220 to settle potential violations and will adopt a corrective action plan to evidence their remediation of these findings.
OCR received a breach notice in February 2012 from QCA Health Plan, Inc. of Arkansas reporting that an unencrypted laptop computer containing the ePHI of 148 individuals was stolen from a workforce member’s car. While QCA encrypted their devices following discovery of the breach, OCR’s investigation revealed that QCA failed to comply with multiple requirements of the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules, beginning from the compliance date of the Security Rule in April 2005 and ending in June 2012. QCA agreed to a $250,000 monetary settlement and is required to provide HHS with an updated risk analysis and corresponding risk management plan that includes specific security measures to reduce the risks to and vulnerabilities of its ePHI. QCA is also required to retrain its workforce and document its ongoing compliance efforts.
Catholic Health Care Services Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action PlanAlex Slaney
Catholic Health Care Services of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia settlement, Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan as a result of violating the HIPAA Security Rule for ePHI
Resolution Agreement: On January 6, 2012, HHS notified SRMC of its initiation of a compliance review of its facility to determine whether there was a failure to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Rule. HHS’s compliance review was prompted by an article in the Los Angeles Times published on January 4, 2012. The article indicated that two of SRMC’s senior leaders met with the media to discuss the medical services provided to a patient (the Affected Party) without a valid written authorization.
Raleigh Orthopedic RA and CAP April 2016Alex Slaney
Resolution Agreement and CAP put in place after Raleigh Orthopedic violated The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule
Parkview Health System, Inc. (Parkview) has agreed to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR). Parkview will pay $800,000 and adopt a corrective action plan to correct deficiencies in its HIPAA compliance program.
The final disposition of the Act 13 law that was challenged by seven selfish PA towns, an anti-drilling doctor and a wacko environmental group. The PA Supreme Court couldn't be bothered deciding these points and sent it back to a lower court for a final decision. The Commonwealth Court found that the Public Utility Commission could not evaluate a town's zoning ordinances to be sure they don't violate state standards. It also found the language in Act 13 limiting a doctor from making public the specific formulas used by drillers in their fracking fluids. There were a few other notable decisions as well.
Chapter 7 bankruptcy is more commonly used by individuals who have only basic property, with little or no money beyond what's needed for monthly essentials. It is essentially the "clean slate" bankruptcy that allows a consumer to wipe clean the past and start over.
When you're seeking Chapter 13 bankruptcy information, it makes sense to turn to experts. Larry P. Smith & Associates can provide expert assistance with Chapter 13 bankruptcy, or with any type of bankruptcy information.
Adult & Pediatric Dermatology, P.C., of Concord, Mass., has agreed to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules with the Department of Health and Human Services, agreeing to a $150,000 payment. The practice will also be required to implement a corrective action plan to correct deficiencies in its HIPAA compliance program. Adult and Pediatric Dermatology is a private practice that delivers dermatology services in four locations in Massachusetts and two in New Hampshire. This case marks the first settlement with a covered entity for not having policies and procedures in place to address the breach notification provisions of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, passed as part of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).
The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) opened an investigation of Adult and Pediatric Dermatology upon receiving a report that an unencrypted thumb drive containing the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of approximately 2,200 individuals was stolen from a vehicle of one its staff members. The thumb drive was never recovered. The investigation revealed that Adult and Pediatric Dermatology had not conducted an accurate and thorough analysis of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality of ePHI as part of its security management process. Further, Adult and Pediatric Dermatology did not fully comply with requirements of the Breach Notification Rule to have in place written policies and procedures and train workforce members.
In addition to a $150,000 resolution amount, the settlement includes a corrective action plan requiring Adult and Pediatric Dermatology to develop a risk analysis and risk management plan to address and mitigate any security risks and vulnerabilities, as well as to provide an implementation report to OCR.
Download the Corrective Action Plan(CAP) here >>
Tips s to providers: Almost all of the HIPAA/HITECH violations identified in the last few years is due to insufficient security risk analysis conducted by the providers or business associates.
Cancer Care Group HIPAA Settlement Agreementdata brackets
Cancer Care has taken corrective action with regard to the specific requirements of the Privacy and Security Rules that are at the core of this enforcement action, as well as actions to come into compliance with the other provisions of the HIPAA Rules. The Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) can be found on the OCR website at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/enforcement/examples/cancercare.html
Raleigh Orthopedic RA and CAP April 2016data brackets
Raleigh Orthopedics's Resolution Agreement and CAP resulting from Raleigh Orthopedic violating the Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy and Security Rules
Raleigh Orthopedic RA and CAP April 2016Alex Slaney
Resolution Agreement and CAP put in place after Raleigh Orthopedic violated The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule
Parkview Health System, Inc. (Parkview) has agreed to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR). Parkview will pay $800,000 and adopt a corrective action plan to correct deficiencies in its HIPAA compliance program.
The final disposition of the Act 13 law that was challenged by seven selfish PA towns, an anti-drilling doctor and a wacko environmental group. The PA Supreme Court couldn't be bothered deciding these points and sent it back to a lower court for a final decision. The Commonwealth Court found that the Public Utility Commission could not evaluate a town's zoning ordinances to be sure they don't violate state standards. It also found the language in Act 13 limiting a doctor from making public the specific formulas used by drillers in their fracking fluids. There were a few other notable decisions as well.
Chapter 7 bankruptcy is more commonly used by individuals who have only basic property, with little or no money beyond what's needed for monthly essentials. It is essentially the "clean slate" bankruptcy that allows a consumer to wipe clean the past and start over.
When you're seeking Chapter 13 bankruptcy information, it makes sense to turn to experts. Larry P. Smith & Associates can provide expert assistance with Chapter 13 bankruptcy, or with any type of bankruptcy information.
Adult & Pediatric Dermatology, P.C., of Concord, Mass., has agreed to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules with the Department of Health and Human Services, agreeing to a $150,000 payment. The practice will also be required to implement a corrective action plan to correct deficiencies in its HIPAA compliance program. Adult and Pediatric Dermatology is a private practice that delivers dermatology services in four locations in Massachusetts and two in New Hampshire. This case marks the first settlement with a covered entity for not having policies and procedures in place to address the breach notification provisions of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, passed as part of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).
The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) opened an investigation of Adult and Pediatric Dermatology upon receiving a report that an unencrypted thumb drive containing the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of approximately 2,200 individuals was stolen from a vehicle of one its staff members. The thumb drive was never recovered. The investigation revealed that Adult and Pediatric Dermatology had not conducted an accurate and thorough analysis of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality of ePHI as part of its security management process. Further, Adult and Pediatric Dermatology did not fully comply with requirements of the Breach Notification Rule to have in place written policies and procedures and train workforce members.
In addition to a $150,000 resolution amount, the settlement includes a corrective action plan requiring Adult and Pediatric Dermatology to develop a risk analysis and risk management plan to address and mitigate any security risks and vulnerabilities, as well as to provide an implementation report to OCR.
Download the Corrective Action Plan(CAP) here >>
Tips s to providers: Almost all of the HIPAA/HITECH violations identified in the last few years is due to insufficient security risk analysis conducted by the providers or business associates.
Cancer Care Group HIPAA Settlement Agreementdata brackets
Cancer Care has taken corrective action with regard to the specific requirements of the Privacy and Security Rules that are at the core of this enforcement action, as well as actions to come into compliance with the other provisions of the HIPAA Rules. The Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) can be found on the OCR website at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/enforcement/examples/cancercare.html
Raleigh Orthopedic RA and CAP April 2016data brackets
Raleigh Orthopedics's Resolution Agreement and CAP resulting from Raleigh Orthopedic violating the Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy and Security Rules
Presence Health Resolution Agreement with OCRdata brackets
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), has announced the first Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) settlement based on the untimely reporting of a breach of unsecured protected health information (PHI). Presence Health has agreed to settle potential violations of the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule by paying $475,000 and implementing a corrective action plan. Presence Health is one of the largest health care networks serving Illinois and consists of approximately 150 locations, including 11 hospitals and 27 long-term care and senior living facilities. Presence Health also has multiple physicians’ offices and health care centers in its system and offers home care, hospice care, and behavioral health services. With this settlement amount, OCR balanced the need to emphasize the importance of timely breach reporting with the desire not to disincentive breach reporting altogether.
On January 31, 2014, OCR received a breach notification report from Presence indicating that on October 22, 2013, Presence discovered that paper-based operating room schedules, which contained the PHI of 836 individuals, were missing from the Presence Surgery Center at the Presence St. Joseph Medical Center in Joliet, Illinois. The information consisted of the affected individuals’ names, dates of birth, medical record numbers, dates of procedures, types of procedures, surgeon names, and types of anesthesia. OCR’s investigation revealed that Presence Health failed to notify, without unreasonable delay and within 60 days of discovering the breach, each of the 836 individuals affected by the breach, prominent media outlets (as required for breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), and OCR.
“Covered entities need to have a clear policy and procedures in place to respond to the Breach Notification Rule’s timeliness requirements” said OCR Director Jocelyn Samuels. “Individuals need prompt notice of a breach of their unsecured PHI so they can take action that could help mitigate any potential harm caused by the breach.”
The Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan may be found on the OCR website at http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/compliance-enforcement/agreements/presence
OCR’s guidance on breach notification may be found at http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/breach-notification/index.html
To learn more about non-discrimination and health information privacy laws, your civil rights, and privacy rights in health care and human service settings, and to find information on filing a complaint, visit us at http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/index.html
Follow OCR on Twitter at http://twitter.com/HHSOCR
First HIPAA enforcement action for lack of timely breach notification settles...David Sweigert
First HIPAA enforcement action for lack of timely breach notification settles for $475,000
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), has announced the first Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) settlement based on the untimely reporting of a breach of unsecured protected health information (PHI). Presence Health has agreed to settle potential violations of the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule by paying $475,000 and implementing a corrective action plan. Presence Health is one of the largest health care networks serving Illinois and consists of approximately 150 locations, including 11 hospitals and 27 long-term care and senior living facilities. Presence also has multiple physicians’ offices and health care centers in its system and offers home care, hospice care, and behavioral health services. With this settlement amount, OCR balanced the need to emphasize the importance of timely breach reporting with the desire not to disincentive breach reporting altogether.
On January 31, 2014, OCR received a breach notification report from Presence indicating that on October 22, 2013, Presence discovered that paper-based operating room schedules, which contained the PHI of 836 individuals, were missing from the Presence Surgery Center at the Presence St. Joseph Medical Center in Joliet, Illinois. The information consisted of the affected individuals’ names, dates of birth, medical record numbers, dates of procedures, types of procedures, surgeon names, and types of anesthesia. OCR’s investigation revealed that Presence Health failed to notify, without unreasonable delay and within 60 days of discovering the breach, each of the 836 individuals affected by the breach, prominent media outlets (as required for breaches affecting 500 or more individuals), and OCR.
IIAC Young Agents - Protecting Your Insureds\' Private InformationJason Hoeppner
Personal information security and breach notification requirements are topics that all independent insurance agencies need to be aware of and be prepared for operationally in the event of a loss of clients\' information.
Office of Inspector General Study on OCR's HIPAA audit programdata brackets
Office of Inspector General: OCR should strengthen its oversight of covered entities' compliance with the HIPAA privacy standards.
OIG has recently completed a study of OCR's HIPAA audit program and published the following recommendations:
(1) OCR should fully implement a permanent audit program
(2) OCR should maintain complete documentation of corrective action
(3) OCR should develop an efficient method in its case-tracking system to search for and track covered entities
(4) OCR should develop a policy requiring OCR staff to check whether covered entities have been previously investigated
(5) OCR should continue to expand outreach and education efforts to covered entities. OCR concurred with all five recommendations and described its activities to address them.
OCR's chief Jocelyn Samuels has concurred with all the recommendations of OIG.
For the complete report please visit our slideshare page:
EHR meaningful use security risk assessment sample documentdata brackets
Under the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule, business associates are required to perform active risk prevention and safeguarding of patient information that are very important to patient privacy. The HITECH act allows only minimum necessary to be disclosed when handling protected health information (PHI).
This security risk assessment exercise has been performed to support the requirements of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for the Civil Rights (OCR) and other applicable state data privacy laws and regulations. Upon completion of this risk assessment, a detail risk management plan need to be developed based on the gaps identified from the risk analysis. The gaps identified and recommendations provided are based on the input provided by the staff, budget, scope and other practical considerations
The HITECH Act authorizes Health and Human Services(HHS) to conduct periodic audits to ensure that covered entities and business associates are complying with the HIPAA/HITECH Privacy, Security and Breach rules. As a result, Office for Civil Rights(OCR), through the use of KPMG audit services, has begun to develop a pilot audit program.
EHR 2.0 HIPAA/HITECH compliance assurance services help healthcare organizations to discover the gap areas based on the required and addressable requirements. Our privacy, security and breach compliance assessment includes all of requirements listed in the act.
Trends and Career Opportunities in Health ITdata brackets
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, healthcare and social services jobs are expected to grow 24 percent from 2008 through 2018, faster than the average for all occupations. Growth in the healthcare IT industry can be attributed to many factors: Long term care of a large aging population, the need for technology to provide greater accountability for two thirds of the population at risk for heart disease due to being overweight or obese, more emphasis on preventive care and the use of technology and data to increase the quality of patient care and overall accountability. Additionally, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) bill included a section known as HITECH where entitlement funds are available (+/-$34 billion) to Medicare and Medicaid participating providers (hospitals, physicians and other providers) as an incentive to develop and improve their health information technology (HIT) capabilities, primarily in the area of electronic health records (EHRs).
The problem that many hospitals and other providers encounter in filling these jobs is the shortage of qualified, experienced health IT staff. While the federally funded training programs in 82 community colleges may help meet some of the demand, the majority of the available positions are not entry level, say consultants and CIOs.
This presentation will focus on these trends and career opportunities in health IT for professionals based on job roles, vendors technology and market transition.
Guest Speaker: Tommy Fowler, Healthcare Services at TEK Systems
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary HIPAA Violationdata brackets
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Associates, Inc. (collectively referred to as “MEEI”) has agreed to pay the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) $1.5 million to settle potential violations of the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules. MEEI has also agreed to take corrective action to improve policies and procedures to safeguard the privacy and security of their patients’ protected health information and retain an independent monitor to report on MEEI’s compliance efforts. OCR’s investigation followed a breach report submitted by MEEI, as required by the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule, reporting the theft of an unencrypted personal laptop containing the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of MEEI patients and research subjects. The information contained on the laptop included patient prescriptions and clinical information. OCR’s investigation indicated that while MEEI’s management was aware of the Security Rule, MEEI failed to take necessary steps to comply with the requirements of the Rule, such as such as conducting a thorough analysis of the risk to the confidentiality of ePHI maintained on portable devices, implementing security measures sufficient to ensure the confidentiality of ePHI that MEEI created, maintained, and transmitted using portable devices, adopting and implementing policies and procedures to restrict access to ePHI to authorized users of portable devices, and adopting and implementing policies and procedures to address security incident identification, reporting, and response.
Mobile devices and applications in healthcare: Security and Compliance Risksdata brackets
Recent HHS analysis of reported breaches indicates that almost 40% of large breaches involve lost or stolen devices.” Majority of these devices are laptops, smart phones, etc., This 50-minute webinar will focus on how to effectively comply and secure mobile devices in healthcare industry.
Business Associate Assurance: What Covered Entities Need to Knowdata brackets
Business Associate Assurance: What covered entities need to know
Have you identified your key business associates handling e-PHI that you create, receive, maintain or transmit?
Do you review your contract periodically with your key business associates?
Do you have the right to audit clause or require your business associate to follow certain minimum security controls and best practices?
One of the most challenging issues for health care organizations is ensuring business associates can be trusted with ePHI (electronic Protected Health Information). Of the 11 million people affected by reportable data breaches between September 2009 and June 2011, 6 million, or 55%, were affected by data breaches involving business associates, according to the federal government. This 50-minute webinar helps the audience to learn assessment strategies a covered entity needs to institute to manage business associates.
Learn more about business associate assessment and engagement best practices by attending our webinar.
Learn more at http://ehr20.com/services/business-associate-assessment/
The HIPAA Security Rule establishes national standards to protect individuals’ electronic personal health information that is created, received, used, or maintained by a covered entity. The Security Rule requires appropriate administrative, physical and technical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and security of electronic protected health information. The Security Rule is located at 45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and C of Part 164.
HIPAA Security Rule list 28 adminstrative safeguards, 12 Physical safeguards, 12 technical safeguards along with specific organization and policies and procedures requirements. EHR 2.0 HIPAA security assessment services help covered entities to discover the gap areas based on the required and addressable requirements.
There are two main rules for HIPAA. One is a rule on privacy and the other on Security.
The HIPAA Privacy Rule establishes national standards to protect individuals’ medical records and other personal health information and applies to health plans, health care clearinghouses, and those health care providers that conduct certain health care transactions electronically. The Rule requires appropriate safeguards to protect the privacy of personal health information, and sets limits and conditions on the uses and disclosures that may be made of such information without patient authorization. The Rule also gives patients rights over their health information, including rights to examine and obtain a copy of their health records, and to request corrections. The Privacy Rule is located at 45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part 164.
How often the security should be reviewed?
Security standard mentioned under HIPAA should be reviewed and modified as needed to continue provision of reasonable and appropriate protection of electronic protected health information.
Confidentiality
Limiting information access and disclosure to authorized users (the right people)
Integrity
Trustworthiness of information resources (no inappropriate changes)
Availability
Availability of information resources (at the right time)
http://ehr20.com/services/hipaa-security-assessment/
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdfAnujkumaranit
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems. It encompasses tasks such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language understanding. AI technologies are revolutionizing various fields, from healthcare to finance, by enabling machines to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence.
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
Prix Galien International 2024 Forum ProgramLevi Shapiro
June 20, 2024, Prix Galien International and Jerusalem Ethics Forum in ROME. Detailed agenda including panels:
- ADVANCES IN CARDIOLOGY: A NEW PARADIGM IS COMING
- WOMEN’S HEALTH: FERTILITY PRESERVATION
- WHAT’S NEW IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS,
ONCOLOGICAL AND INFLAMMATORY SKIN DISEASES?
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ETHICS
- GENE THERAPY
- BEYOND BORDERS: GLOBAL INITIATIVES FOR DEMOCRATIZING LIFE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROMOTING ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE
- ETHICAL CHALLENGES IN LIFE SCIENCES
- Prix Galien International Awards Ceremony
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...GL Anaacs
Contact us if you are interested:
Email / Skype : kefaya1771@gmail.com
Threema: PXHY5PDH
New BATCH Ku !!! MUCH IN DEMAND FAST SALE EVERY BATCH HAPPY GOOD EFFECT BIG BATCH !
Contact me on Threema or skype to start big business!!
Hot-sale products:
NEW HOT EUTYLONE WHITE CRYSTAL!!
5cl-adba precursor (semi finished )
5cl-adba raw materials
ADBB precursor (semi finished )
ADBB raw materials
APVP powder
5fadb/4f-adb
Jwh018 / Jwh210
Eutylone crystal
Protonitazene (hydrochloride) CAS: 119276-01-6
Flubrotizolam CAS: 57801-95-3
Metonitazene CAS: 14680-51-4
Payment terms: Western Union,MoneyGram,Bitcoin or USDT.
Deliver Time: Usually 7-15days
Shipping method: FedEx, TNT, DHL,UPS etc.Our deliveries are 100% safe, fast, reliable and discreet.
Samples will be sent for your evaluation!If you are interested in, please contact me, let's talk details.
We specializes in exporting high quality Research chemical, medical intermediate, Pharmaceutical chemicals and so on. Products are exported to USA, Canada, France, Korea, Japan,Russia, Southeast Asia and other countries.
Anti ulcer drugs and their Advance pharmacology ||
Anti-ulcer drugs are medications used to prevent and treat ulcers in the stomach and upper part of the small intestine (duodenal ulcers). These ulcers are often caused by an imbalance between stomach acid and the mucosal lining, which protects the stomach lining.
||Scope: Overview of various classes of anti-ulcer drugs, their mechanisms of action, indications, side effects, and clinical considerations.
Skagit county- HIPAA violation settlement agreement with HHS
1. RESOLUTION AGREEMENT
I. Recitals
1. Parties. The Parties to this Resolution Agreement (Agreement) are the United States
Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (HHS) and Skagit County,
Washington (Skagit County).
2. Authority of HHS. HHS enforces the Federal standards that govern the privacy of
individually identifiable health information (45 C.F.R. Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part
164, the “Privacy Rule”), the Federal standards that govern the security of electronic individually
identifiable health information (45 C.F.R. Part 160 and Subparts A and C of Part 164, the
“Security Rule”), and the Federal standards that govern notification in the case of breach of
unsecured protected health information (45 C.F.R. Part 160 and Subparts A and D of Part 164,
the “Breach Notification Rule.”) HHS has the authority to conduct the investigations of
complaints alleging violations of the Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules by covered
entities, and covered entities must cooperate with HHS’ investigation. 45 C.F.R. § 160.306(c)
and §160.310(b).
3. Factual Background and Covered Conduct. On December 9, 2011, HHS received
notification from Skagit County regarding a breach of its unsecured electronic protected health
information (ePHI). On May 25, 2012, HHS notified Skagit County of its investigation regarding
Skagit County’s compliance with the Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules. HHS’s
investigation indicated that the following conduct occurred (“Covered Conduct”).
i.
From approximately September 14, 2011 until September 28, 2011, Skagit County
disclosed the ePHI of 1,581 individuals in violation of the Privacy Rule (See 45
C.F.R. §§160.103 and 164.502 (a)) by providing access to electronic protected
health information (ePHI) on its public web server;
ii.
From November 28, 2011 until present, Skagit County failed to provide notification
as required by the Breach Notification Rule (See 45 C.F.R. § 164.404) to all of the
individuals for whom it knew or should have known that the privacy or security of
the individual’s ePHI had been compromised as a result of the breach incident
described in paragraph I.3.i., above;
iii.
From April 20, 2005 until present, Skagit County failed to implement sufficient
policies and procedures to prevent, detect, contain, and correct security violations
(See 45 C.F.R. § 164.308(a)(1)(i));
iv.
From April 20, 2005 until June 1, 2012, Skagit County failed to implement and
maintain in written or electronic form policies and procedures reasonably designed
to ensure compliance with the Security Rule (See 45 C.F.R. § 164.316(a) and (b));
and
RA/CAP page 1 of 10
2. v.
From April 20, 2005 until present, Skagit County failed to provide security
awareness and training to all workforce members, including its Information Security
staff members, as necessary and appropriate for the workforce members to carry out
their functions within Skagit County (See 45 C.F.R. § 164.308(a)(5)).
4. No Admission. This Agreement is not an admission of liability by Skagit County.
5. No Concession. This Agreement is not a concession by HHS that Skagit County is
not in violation of the Privacy Rule, the Security Rule, or the Breach Notification Rule and that
Skagit County is not liable for civil money penalties.
6. Intention of Parties to Effect Resolution. This Agreement is intended to resolve HHS
Transaction Number: 12-136147 regarding possible violations of the Federal Standards for Privacy of
Individually Identifiable Health Information, the Security Standards for the Protection of Electronic
Protected Health Information, and Notification in the Case of Breach of Unsecured Protected Health
Information (45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164, Subparts A, C, D, and E), the Privacy, Security, and
Breach Notification Rules). In consideration of the Parties’ interest in avoiding the uncertainty,
burden and expense of further investigation and formal proceedings, the Parties agree to resolve this
matter according to the Terms and Conditions below.
II. Terms and Conditions
1. Payment. Skagit County agrees to pay HHS the amount of $215,000 (Resolution Amount).
Skagit County agrees to pay the Resolution Amount on the Effective Date of this Agreement as defined in
paragraph II.9 by automated clearing house transaction pursuant to written instructions to be provided by
HHS.
2. Corrective Action Plan. Skagit County has entered into and agrees to comply with the
Corrective Action Plan (CAP), attached as Appendix A, which is incorporated into this Agreement by
reference. If Skagit County breaches the CAP, and fails to cure the breach as set forth in the CAP, then
Skagit County will be in breach of this Agreement and HHS will not be subject to the Release set forth in
paragraph 3 of section II of this Agreement.
3. Release by HHS. In consideration and conditioned upon Skagit County’s performance of its
obligations under this Agreement, HHS releases Skagit County from any actions it may have against
Skagit County under the Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules for the covered conduct
identified in paragraph 3 of section I. HHS does not release Skagit County from, nor waive any rights,
obligations, or causes of action other than those specifically referred to in this paragraph. This release
does not extend to actions that may be brought under section 1177 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §
1320d-6.
4. Agreement by Released Parties. Skagit County shall not contest the validity of its obligations
to pay, nor the amount of, the Resolution Amount or any other obligations agreed to under this
Agreement. Skagit County waives all procedural rights granted under Section 1128A of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320a- 7a) and 45 C.F.R. Part 160 Subpart E, and HHS claims collection
regulations at 45 C.F.R. Part 30, including, but not limited to, notice, hearing, and appeal with respect to
the Resolution Amount.
RA/CAP page 2 of 10
3. 5. Binding on Successors. This Agreement is binding on Skagit County and its successors, heirs,
transferees, and assigns.
6. Costs. Each Party to this Agreement shall bear its own legal and other costs incurred in
connection with this matter, including the preparation and performance of this Agreement.
7. No Additional Releases. This Agreement is intended to be for the benefit of the Parties only,
and by this instrument the Parties do not release any claims against any other person or entity.
8. Effect of Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the Parties.
All material representations, understandings, and promises of the Parties are contained in this Agreement.
Any modifications to this Agreement shall be set forth in writing and signed by all Parties.
9. Execution of Agreement and Effective Date. The Agreement shall become effective (i.e., final
and binding) upon the date of signing of this Agreement and the CAP by the last signatory (Effective
Date).
10. Tolling of Statute of Limitations. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a(c)(1), a civil money
penalty must be imposed within six years from the date of the occurrence of the violation. To ensure that
this six-year period does not expire during the term of this agreement, Skagit County agrees that the time
between the Effective Date of this Resolution Agreement (as set forth in paragraph 15) and the date the
Resolution Agreement may be terminated by reason of Skagit County’s breach, plus one-year thereafter,
will not be included in calculating the six (6) year statute of limitations applicable to the violations which
are the subject of this agreement. Skagit County waives and will not plead any statute of limitations,
laches, or similar defenses to any administrative action relating to the covered conduct identified in
paragraph 3 of section I that is filed by HHS within the time period set forth above, except to the extent
that such defenses would have been available had an administrative action been filed on the Effective
Date of this Resolution Agreement.
11. Disclosure. HHS places no restriction on the publication of the Agreement. This Agreement
and information related to this Agreement may be made public by either Party. In addition, HHS may be
required to disclose this Agreement and related material to any person upon request consistent with the
applicable provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, and its implementing
regulations, 45 C.F.R. Part 5.
12. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which
constitutes an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
13. Authorizations. The individual(s) signing this Agreement on behalf of Skagit County
represent and warrant that they are authorized by Skagit County to execute this Agreement. The
individual(s) signing this Agreement on behalf of HHS represent and warrant that they are signing this
Agreement in their official capacities and that they are authorized to execute this Agreement.
RA/CAP page 3 of 10
4. For Skagit County, Washington
Board of Commissioners
Skagit County, Washington
_____/s/_______________________
Ron Wesen, Chair
_____/s/_______________________
Kenneth A. Dahlstedt, Commissioner
_____/s/_______________________
Sharon D. Dillon, Commissioner
_March 5, 2014______
Date
For United States Department of Health and Human Services
____/s/________________________
Linda Yuu Connor
Regional Manager, Region X
Office for Civil Rights
March 6, 2014_______
Date
RA/CAP page 4 of 10
5. Appendix A
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
BETWEEN THE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AND
SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
I.
Preamble
Skagit County, Washington (Skagit County) hereby enters into this Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
with the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (HHS).
Contemporaneously with this CAP, Skagit County is entering into a Resolution Agreement with HHS,
and this CAP is incorporated by reference into the Resolution Agreement as Appendix A. Skagit County
enters into this CAP as consideration for the release set forth in section II, paragraph 3 of the Resolution
Agreement.
II.
Contact Persons and Submissions
A. Contact Persons
Skagit County has identified the following individual as its authorized representative and contact person
regarding the implementation of this CAP and for receipt and submission of notifications and reports:
Donnie LaPlante, Senior Human Resources/Risk Analyst
Skagit County, Washington
1800 Continental Place, Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Voice: (360 419-7602
Fax: (360) 336-9424
HHS has identified the following individual as its authorized representative and contact person with
whom Skagit County is to report information regarding the implementation of this CAP:
Linda Yuu Connor, Regional Manager, OCR Region X
2201 Sixth Avenue, Mail Stop: RX-11
Seattle, WA 98121-1831
Voice: (206) 615-2290
Fax: (206) 615-2297
Skagit County and HHS agree to promptly notify each other of any changes in the contact persons or the
other information provided above.
B. Proof of Submissions. Unless otherwise specified, all notifications and reports required by this
CAP may be made by any means, including certified mail, overnight mail, or hand delivery, provided that
there is proof that such notification was received. For purposes of this requirement, internal facsimile
confirmation sheets do not constitute proof of receipt.
RA/CAP page 5 of 10
6. III.
Term of CAP
The period of compliance obligations assumed by Skagit County under this CAP shall begin on
the effective date of this CAP (Effective Date) and end three years from the date HHS approves the
Policies and Procedures required by section V.E., except that after this period Skagit County shall be
obligated to (a) submit the Annual Report for the final Reporting Period, as set forth in section VI.; and
(b) comply with the document retention requirement set forth in section VII. The Effective Date for this
CAP shall be calculated in accordance with Section II, paragraph 9 of the Resolution Agreement.
IV.
Time
Any reference to number of days refers to number of calendar days. In computing any period of
time prescribed or allowed by this CAP, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated
period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be
included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a Federal holiday, in which event the period runs until the
end of the next day which is not one of the aforementioned days.
V.
Corrective Action Obligations
Skagit County agrees to the following:
A. Provide Substitute Breach Notification to Affected Individuals Not Previously Notified.
1. Skagit County shall create a substitute breach notification to be conspicuously
published in a major print or broadcast media serving the geographic areas where the
affected individuals not previously provided with individual notification are likely to
reside or conspicuously posted for a period of 90 days on Skagit County’s home page.
Skagit County’s substitute breach notification shall include all of the information
required by 45 C.F.R. §164.404(c) and a toll-free number that shall remain active for
at least 90 days from the date the notice is published in the media or posted on Skagit
County’s home page, as required by 45 C.F.R. §164.404(d)(2)(ii)(B).
2. Within 30 days of the Effective Date, Skagit County shall provide its substitute breach
notification to HHS for review and approval. Upon receiving any recommended
changes to its substitute breach notification from HHS, Skagit County shall have 15
days to revise the substitute breach notice accordingly and provide the revised
substitute breach notification to HHS for review and approval.
3. Within 15 days of receiving HHS’s approval of its substitute breach notification,
Skagit County shall publish the conspicuous notice of its substitute breach notification
in a major print or broadcast media or conspicuously post the substitute breach
notification on its home page and provide HHS with documentation of the same.
B. Accounting of Disclosures.
1. Within 30 days of the Effective Date, Skagit County shall provide to HHS for its
review and approval a description of its procedure that ensures that the content of any
accounting of disclosures provided pursuant to 45 C.F.R. § 164.528, to any individual
whose PHI was disclosed, will include the disclosure of PHI as a result of the security
incident described in paragraph I.3.i.of the Agreement.
RA/CAP page 6 of 10
7. 2. Upon receiving any recommended changes from HHS to its accounting of disclosures
procedure, Skagit County shall have 15 days to revise the accounting of disclosures
procedure accordingly and provide the revised accounting of disclosures procedure to
HHS for review and approval. Upon receiving notice from HHS approving the
procedure, Skagit County shall promptly implement the procedure.
C. Hybrid Entity and Business Associate Documentation.
1. Within 60 days of the Effective Date, Skagit County shall submit for HHS’s review
and approval hybrid entity documents designating its covered health care components
in accordance with 45 C.F.R. §164.105. Skagit County shall include with its
document submission its policies and procedures to ensure compliance with 45 C.F.R.
§164.105, including the safeguards requirements at 45 C.F.R. §164.105(a)(2)(ii) and a
sample of its business associate agreement or memorandum of understanding to be
used with any business associate that performs business associate functions for a
Skagit County covered health care component, pursuant to 45 C.F.R. §§164.502(e),
164.504(e), 164.308(b), and 164.314(a).
2. Upon receiving any recommended changes from HHS to its documents, Skagit County
shall have 30 days to revise the documents accordingly and provide the revised
documents to HHS for review and approval. Within 30 days of HHS’s approval of its
documents, Skagit County shall provide documentation that it has implemented its
hybrid entity and related safeguards policies and procedures. It will also provide
documentation that it has obtained satisfactory assurances from each business
associate of a Skagit County covered health care component that it will appropriately
safeguard the PHI created or received on behalf of such covered health care
component, in accordance with 45 C.F.R. §§164.502(e), 164.504(e), 164.308(b), and
164.314(a).
D. Security Management Process.
1. Skagit County shall conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks
and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic
protected health information (ePHI) held by the covered health care components of
Skagit County as identified in its hybrid entity documentation approved by HHS.
Skagit County shall implement security measures sufficient to reduce the risks and
vulnerabilities identified in the risk analysis to a reasonable and appropriate level.
2. Within 120 days of HHS’s approval of its hybrid entity documentation under section
V.C., above, Skagit County shall provide its risk analysis and description of risk
management measures (including implementation dates for such measures) to HHS for
review and approval. Upon receiving any recommended changes to the risk analysis
and description of risk management measures from HHS, Skagit County shall have 60
days to revise the risk analysis and description of risk management measures, and
provide the revisions to HHS for review and approval.
E. Create and Update Policies and Procedures.
1. Skagit County shall create and revise, as necessary, written policies and procedures for
its covered health care components to comply with the Federal standards that govern
the privacy, security, and breach notification of individually identifiable health
RA/CAP page 7 of 10
8. information (45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164, Subparts A, C, D, and E, the Privacy,
Security, and Breach Notification Rules).
2. Within 60 days after HHS’s approval of Skagit County’s risk analysis and description
of its risk management measures discussed above under Section V.D., Skagit County
shall provide such policies and procedures, consistent with paragraph 1 above, to HHS
for review and approval. Upon receiving any recommended changes to such policies
and procedures from HHS, Skagit County shall have 30 days to revise such policies
and procedures accordingly and provide the revised policies and procedures to HHS
for review and approval.
3. Skagit County shall officially adopt such policies and procedures within 30 days of
receipt of HHS’s approval.
F. Training.
1. All workforce members of Skagit County’s covered health care components who have
access to ePHI shall receive general Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rule
training and specific training related to the new policies and procedures under section
V.E. within 90 days of the adoption of the policies and procedures. Any new members
of a covered health care component workforce that are hired after the initial training
period described in this paragraph shall be trained within 30 days of their beginning as
a member of the workforce.
2. Each individual who is required to attend training shall certify, in writing or in
electronic form, that he or she has received the required training. The training
certification shall specify the date training was received. Skagit County shall provide
copies of the written or electronic certifications of training for the workforce members
of its covered health care components to HHS within 30 days of training. All course
materials shall be retained in compliance with section VII.
3. Skagit County shall review the training annually, and, where appropriate, update the
training to reflect changes in Federal law or HHS guidance, any issues discovered
during audits or reviews, and any other relevant developments.
4. Beginning when a workforce member of a covered health care component is required
to receive training under paragraph 1 of this section, Skagit County shall not allow
such workforce member to use or access ePHI unless that workforce member has
signed or provided the written or electronic training certification required by paragraph
2 of this section.
G. Reportable Events.
1. The one-year period beginning on the Effective Date and each following one-year
period shall be referred to as “the Reporting Periods.” During each Reporting Period
under this CAP, Skagit County shall, upon receiving information that a workforce
member of a covered health care component may have failed to comply with its
Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification policies and procedures, promptly
investigate the matter. If Skagit County, after review and investigation, determines
that a member of the workforce of a covered health care component has failed to
comply with its Privacy, Security and Breach Notification policies and procedures,
RA/CAP page 8 of 10
9. Skagit County shall notify HHS in writing within 30 days. Such violations shall be
known as “Reportable Events.” The report to HHS shall include the following:
a. A complete description of the event, including the relevant facts, the persons
involved, and the provision(s) of Skagit County’s Privacy, Security, and Breach
Notification policies and procedures implicated; and
b. A description of the actions taken and any further steps Skagit County plans to take
to address the matter, to mitigate any harm, and to prevent it from recurring,
including the application of appropriate sanctions against covered health care
component workforce members who failed to comply with its Privacy, Security,
and Breach Notification policies and procedures.
2. If no Reportable Events have occurred within a Reporting Period, Skagit County shall
so inform HHS in its Annual Report for that Reporting Period in accordance with
section VI. of this CAP.
VI.
Annual Reports
Skagit County shall submit to HHS Annual Reports with respect to the status of and findings regarding
Skagit County’s compliance with this CAP for each of the Reporting Periods. Skagit County shall submit
each Annual Report to HHS no later than 60 days after the end of each corresponding Reporting Period.
The Annual Report shall include:
A. A summary of the security management measures (defined in section V.D.) taken during the
Reporting Period;
B. A summary of Reportable Events (defined in section V.G.) identified during the Reporting Period
and the status of any corrective and preventative action relating to all such Reportable Events; and
C. An attestation signed by an officer of Skagit County attesting that he or she has reviewed the
Annual Report, has made a reasonable inquiry regarding its content and believes that, upon such
inquiry, the information is accurate and truthful.
VII.
Document Retention
Skagit County shall maintain for inspection and copying all documents and records relating to compliance
with this CAP for six years.
VIII.
Breach Provisions
Skagit County is expected to fully and timely comply with all provisions of its CAP obligations.
A. Timely Written Requests for Extensions. Skagit County may, in advance of any due date set
forth in this CAP, submit a timely written request for an extension of time to perform any act or file any
notification or report required by this CAP. A “timely written request” is defined as a request in writing
received by HHS at least five days prior to the date by which any act is due to be performed or any
notification or report is due to be filed. It is within HHS’s sole discretion as to whether to grant or deny
the extension requested.
RA/CAP page 9 of 10
10. B. Notice of Breach and Intent to Impose CMP. The Parties agree that a breach of this CAP by
Skagit County constitutes a breach of the Resolution Agreement. Upon a determination by HHS that
Skagit County has breached this CAP, HHS may notify Skagit County of (a) Skagit County’s breach;
and (b) HHS’s intent to impose a civil money penalty (CMP) pursuant to 45 C.F.R. Part 160 for the
Covered Conduct set forth in paragraph 3 of section I of the Resolution Agreement and any other
conduct that constitutes a violation of the HIPAA Privacy, Security, or Breach Notification Rules (this
notification is hereinafter referred to as the “Notice of Breach and Intent to Impose CMP”).
C. Response. Skagit County shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of the Notice of
Breach and Intent to Impose CMP to demonstrate to HHS’ satisfaction that:
1. Skagit County is in compliance with the obligations of the CAP cited by HHS as being
the basis for the breach;
2. The alleged breach has been cured; or
3. The alleged breach cannot be cured within the 30 day period, but that (i) Skagit County
has begun to take action to cure the breach; (ii) Skagit County is pursuing such action with due
diligence; and (iii) Skagit County has provided to HHS a reasonable timetable for curing the breach.
D. Imposition of CMP. If at the conclusion of the 30 day period, Skagit County fails to meet
the requirements of section VIII.C. to HHS’s satisfaction, HHS may proceed with the imposition of a
CMP against Skagit County pursuant to 45 C.F.R. Part 160 for the Covered Conduct set forth in
paragraph 3 of the Resolution Agreement and any other conduct that constitutes a violation of the
HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules. HHS shall notify Skagit County in writing of its determination to
proceed with the imposition of a CMP.
For Skagit County, Washington
Board of Commissioners
Skagit County, Washington
_____/s/_______________________
Ron Wesen, Chair
_____/s/_______________________
Kenneth A. Dahlstedt, Commissioner
_____/s/_______________________
Sharon D. Dillon, Commissioner
_March 5, 2014_____
Date
For United States Department of Health and Human Services
_____/s/_______________________
Linda Yuu Connor
Regional Manager, Region X
Office for Civil Rights
_March 6, 2014______
Date
RA/CAP page 10 of 10