Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
Engineering: Hoover Dam
Author(s): Henry Petroski
Reviewed work(s):
Source: American Scientist, Vol. 81, No. 6 (November-December 1993), pp. 517-521
Published by: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29775051 .
Accessed: 06/01/2013 08:28
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
.
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to American Scientist.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sigmaxi
http://www.jstor.org/stable/29775051?origin=JSTOR-pdf
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
Hoover Dam
Henry Petroski
Everything seems to move slowly at Hoover
Dam. Long lines of cars, buses and trucks in
low gear wind along the two-lane road
down one steep side of Black Canyon and up the
other. The lines stop frequently as carloads of
tourists crane their necks at the grandeur of the
site, and drivers search for a parking space
among the tiers of overlooks. For all the conges?
tion, few motorists seem impatient or interested
in searching maps for alternate routes. Everyone
driving in this vicinity must know that U.S. High?
way 95, which arcs along the crest of the dam, is
the only road across the Colorado River between
Davis Dam, over 50 miles to the south, and Nava
jo Bridge, over 150 miles to the east.
Pedestrians move about the top of the dam at a
snail's pace in the desert heat, crisscrossing the
crest over which, by design, no water has ever
flowed. Several thousand tourists may visit
Hoover Dam on a summer day, most of them
standing in long lines to board the large elevator
that takes them, 20 at a time, 600 feet down into
the inner workings of the dam. Many come from
Las Vegas, 35 miles to the northwest. Even there,
amid all the noise and neon, a visit to Hoover
Dam is hawked as one of the area's must-do
things. The pitch may be engineering achieve?
ment as awesome entertainment, but few who
visit the works at Black Canyon seem disappoint?
ed by the decided calmness and harmony of it all.
Just as the Mississippi River wreaked havoc in
the Midwest last summer, so the Colorado River
used to be alternately a blessing and a bane for
the Southwest. Although the Colorado seemed a
pot.
http://www.scenic.com/tours/hoover-dam-bus-tour | Learn the fascinating history of Hoover Dam and its construction. See why it is the most-visited dam in the world. Together with Lake Mead and the nearby Hoover Dam Bypass Bridge, it manages water flow from the mighty Colorado River into three surrounding states.
http://www.scenic.com/tours/hoover-dam-bus-tour | Learn the fascinating history of Hoover Dam and its construction. See why it is the most-visited dam in the world. Together with Lake Mead and the nearby Hoover Dam Bypass Bridge, it manages water flow from the mighty Colorado River into three surrounding states.
This slideshow is enhanced content for "The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
Historic Preservation: National Implications" by Will Cook and Jennifer Sandy in the Winter 2015 Forum Journal (Strategies for Saving
National Treasures). To learn more about Preservation Leadership Forum and how you can become a member visit: http://www.preservationnation.org/forum
Historic American Engineering Record: Los Angeles AqueductChris Austin
This is the information for the Los Angeles Aqueduct that is on file at the Historic American Engineering Record at the Library of Congress. This material is in the public domain; no copyright claim is made or assumed by Chris Austin or Mavens Manor Productions.
FROM COMMERCE TO SUSTAINABILITY - THE C&O CANAL’S PASSAGE THROUGH TIMEcohenji
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015, provides a shared blueprint for people and the planet, now and into the future.
More recently, a new set of goals for the Global Biodiversity Framework have been adopted, specifically focused on the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of biodiversity.
These coincide with the efforts to retain 30 to 50% of the planet for conservation purposes.
Thus, each national park will also plan and prioritize its response to these new goals. This presentation focuses on biodiversity in this regard.
Posted 01.24.11 | PERMALINK | PRINT
Essay: Karen Piper
Dreams, Dust and Birds: The Trashing of Owens Lake
Construction of the Jawbone siphon of the Los Angeles Aqueduct, 1912. [courtesy of the Joseph Barlow Lippincott collection, UC Berkeley Water Resources Center Archives]
Manufacturing Dust
The dry bed of what was once Owens Lake contains the detritus of Los Angeles’s fantasies. Starting in 1913, the City of Los Angeles, which historian Kevin Starr has called “the most exquisite invented garden in history,” gradually drained the enormous lake, located two hundred miles to the north of the city. [1] It was a monumental act of engineering: an aqueduct was constructed and then, like a garden hose that was picked up and moved, the Owens River was shifted, so that instead of watering Owens Lake it was watering Los Angeles. In this way the Owens River also began to supply an emerging area called “Hollywoodland,” its water used to create, in the arid landscape of Southern California, a version of the English Lake District. The river fed by the lake supplied 100 percent of Los Angeles’s water, and as a result the 110-square-mile lake gradually dried up and became a howling wasteland of toxic dust. The farmers of Owens Valley fought tenaciously to keep their lake and their river, even resorting to dynamiting the aqueduct (a drama depicted in Chinatown). But they lost.
I grew up near Owens Lake, and I breathed in its dust for close to 20 years. I remember that the experience of walking on the lakebed felt like walking on the moon, with its white crusty surface pocked by shadowy craters and peaks of crumbling crystallized salt. Unfortunately, this dust is not the kind that you can simply breathe out. It has been shown to embed itself in the lungs for life, and it is carcinogenic. In 1987 the Environmental Protection Agency declared Owens lakebed to be the worst dust pollution problem in the United States, affecting around 50,000 people. By then the dangers of this kind of fine dust were well known. But it's a complicated story, of course, and to those of us who have followed it — lived it — the decision about whom to help and whom to hurt had already been made, decades ago. In 1906 President Theodore Roosevelt decided that the waters of Owens River should go to Los Angeles because the city was where it would do the “greatest good for the greatest number.” “This water is more valuable to the people as a whole,” he said, “if used by the city than if used by the people of the Owens Valley.” [2] Over the decades the people of the Owens Valley came to understand that the “people as a whole” did not include us.
So when in the late '80s the EPA mandated that the City of Los Angeles fix the problem of the Owens Valley, and do so within ten years, this came as a surprise. But the ensuing events suggest that the kind of engineering ingenuity that had once made it possible to move the waters was unavailable decades later for the equally large-scale job of.
Write a page to a page and half for each topic and read each topic a.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page to a page and half for each topic and read each topic and there attachment carefully and summarize
1-Mon Oct 28: The Conflict over Religious Authority in Post-Safavid Iran
Attached Files:
Attachment : Momen Akhbari School (1).pdf
Moojan Momen,
An Introduction to Shi’i Islam,
ch.6, 12.
2- Wed Oct 30: Imperial Reform Movements
Attached Files:
Tanzimat Decree (1).pdf
Tobacco Concession (2)pdf
25 Reform Movements (3) pptx
Cleveland,
Modern Middle East,
ch.5-6
Primary Sources:
Gulhane Edict (1839)
Hatt-i Humayun (1856)
Tobacco Concession
3- Fri Nov 1: Social and Intellectual Movements in the Early 20th Century
Attached Files:
alAfghani (1)
Abduh Theology of Unity (2)
.
Write a page discussing why you believe PMI is focusing BA as the fi.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page discussing why you believe PMI is focusing BA as the first step in the project management model.
Provide an example and discuss how poor BA effects project success.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
.
Write a page of personal reflection of your present leadership compe.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page of personal reflection of your present leadership competencies and also possible adjustments that could be made to your leadership approach. Importantly, your Journal entry should be in light of the various concepts that include
Communication, Leadership, and Power and Politics (Topics attached below)
. Also of importance, the Leadership Reflection should be far beyond a mere casual discussion. It should demonstrate a high level of understanding and should also provide adequate integration of authoritative sources with intext citation and in APA format.
.
More Related Content
Similar to Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research SocietyEngineering Hoov.docx
This slideshow is enhanced content for "The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
Historic Preservation: National Implications" by Will Cook and Jennifer Sandy in the Winter 2015 Forum Journal (Strategies for Saving
National Treasures). To learn more about Preservation Leadership Forum and how you can become a member visit: http://www.preservationnation.org/forum
Historic American Engineering Record: Los Angeles AqueductChris Austin
This is the information for the Los Angeles Aqueduct that is on file at the Historic American Engineering Record at the Library of Congress. This material is in the public domain; no copyright claim is made or assumed by Chris Austin or Mavens Manor Productions.
FROM COMMERCE TO SUSTAINABILITY - THE C&O CANAL’S PASSAGE THROUGH TIMEcohenji
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015, provides a shared blueprint for people and the planet, now and into the future.
More recently, a new set of goals for the Global Biodiversity Framework have been adopted, specifically focused on the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of biodiversity.
These coincide with the efforts to retain 30 to 50% of the planet for conservation purposes.
Thus, each national park will also plan and prioritize its response to these new goals. This presentation focuses on biodiversity in this regard.
Posted 01.24.11 | PERMALINK | PRINT
Essay: Karen Piper
Dreams, Dust and Birds: The Trashing of Owens Lake
Construction of the Jawbone siphon of the Los Angeles Aqueduct, 1912. [courtesy of the Joseph Barlow Lippincott collection, UC Berkeley Water Resources Center Archives]
Manufacturing Dust
The dry bed of what was once Owens Lake contains the detritus of Los Angeles’s fantasies. Starting in 1913, the City of Los Angeles, which historian Kevin Starr has called “the most exquisite invented garden in history,” gradually drained the enormous lake, located two hundred miles to the north of the city. [1] It was a monumental act of engineering: an aqueduct was constructed and then, like a garden hose that was picked up and moved, the Owens River was shifted, so that instead of watering Owens Lake it was watering Los Angeles. In this way the Owens River also began to supply an emerging area called “Hollywoodland,” its water used to create, in the arid landscape of Southern California, a version of the English Lake District. The river fed by the lake supplied 100 percent of Los Angeles’s water, and as a result the 110-square-mile lake gradually dried up and became a howling wasteland of toxic dust. The farmers of Owens Valley fought tenaciously to keep their lake and their river, even resorting to dynamiting the aqueduct (a drama depicted in Chinatown). But they lost.
I grew up near Owens Lake, and I breathed in its dust for close to 20 years. I remember that the experience of walking on the lakebed felt like walking on the moon, with its white crusty surface pocked by shadowy craters and peaks of crumbling crystallized salt. Unfortunately, this dust is not the kind that you can simply breathe out. It has been shown to embed itself in the lungs for life, and it is carcinogenic. In 1987 the Environmental Protection Agency declared Owens lakebed to be the worst dust pollution problem in the United States, affecting around 50,000 people. By then the dangers of this kind of fine dust were well known. But it's a complicated story, of course, and to those of us who have followed it — lived it — the decision about whom to help and whom to hurt had already been made, decades ago. In 1906 President Theodore Roosevelt decided that the waters of Owens River should go to Los Angeles because the city was where it would do the “greatest good for the greatest number.” “This water is more valuable to the people as a whole,” he said, “if used by the city than if used by the people of the Owens Valley.” [2] Over the decades the people of the Owens Valley came to understand that the “people as a whole” did not include us.
So when in the late '80s the EPA mandated that the City of Los Angeles fix the problem of the Owens Valley, and do so within ten years, this came as a surprise. But the ensuing events suggest that the kind of engineering ingenuity that had once made it possible to move the waters was unavailable decades later for the equally large-scale job of.
Write a page to a page and half for each topic and read each topic a.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page to a page and half for each topic and read each topic and there attachment carefully and summarize
1-Mon Oct 28: The Conflict over Religious Authority in Post-Safavid Iran
Attached Files:
Attachment : Momen Akhbari School (1).pdf
Moojan Momen,
An Introduction to Shi’i Islam,
ch.6, 12.
2- Wed Oct 30: Imperial Reform Movements
Attached Files:
Tanzimat Decree (1).pdf
Tobacco Concession (2)pdf
25 Reform Movements (3) pptx
Cleveland,
Modern Middle East,
ch.5-6
Primary Sources:
Gulhane Edict (1839)
Hatt-i Humayun (1856)
Tobacco Concession
3- Fri Nov 1: Social and Intellectual Movements in the Early 20th Century
Attached Files:
alAfghani (1)
Abduh Theology of Unity (2)
.
Write a page discussing why you believe PMI is focusing BA as the fi.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page discussing why you believe PMI is focusing BA as the first step in the project management model.
Provide an example and discuss how poor BA effects project success.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
.
Write a page of personal reflection of your present leadership compe.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page of personal reflection of your present leadership competencies and also possible adjustments that could be made to your leadership approach. Importantly, your Journal entry should be in light of the various concepts that include
Communication, Leadership, and Power and Politics (Topics attached below)
. Also of importance, the Leadership Reflection should be far beyond a mere casual discussion. It should demonstrate a high level of understanding and should also provide adequate integration of authoritative sources with intext citation and in APA format.
.
Write a page of compare and contrast for the Big Five Personalit.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page of compare and contrast for the Big Five Personality Model against the MBTI. Attached some info below.
Based on what you have learned thus far, how might the MBTI lack for strong supporting evidence as opposed to the Big Five Model? Thoroughly explain.
After doing so discuss how the Big Five Traits could predict behavior at your place of employment. What could be some advantage of doing so?
What might be some disadvantages? Thoroughly explain.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with intext citations and references in APA format.
.
Write a page of research and discuss an innovation that includes mul.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page of research and discuss an innovation that includes multiple innovation types (per Keely). Discuss the types of innovation involved and comment on how you feel this combination could potentially create a sustainable competitive advantage for the business. Be sure to include references in APA format with intext citations.
.
Write a page answering the questions below.Sometimes projects .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page answering the questions below.
Sometimes projects fail. Such failure can be contributed to unreasonable time constraints, poorly estimated financial estimates, poorly systematized planning process or organizational goals not understood at lower organizational levels.
As a project manager, what key factors are absolutely vital to prevent such failure?
Discuss the role of the leader and manager in a project environment or project initiative.
Be sure to identify how the duties of project managers reinforce the role of leadership. Use real-life examples.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
.
Write a one-paragraph summary of one of the reading assignments from.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-paragraph summary of one of the reading assignments from the textbook.
Reading assignments to choose from are
from Beowulf - trans. Burton Raffel
Children - Slawomir Mrozek
The Jar - Luigi Pirandello
Death of a Tsotsi - Alan Paton
Judges Must Balance Justice vs. Young Lives - Patricia Edmonds
Youth Violent Crime Keeps Climbing - J.L. Albert
Action Will Be Taken: An Action-Packed Story - Heinrich Boll
from The Life of Henry the Fifth - William Shakespeare
Speech, May 13, 1940 - Winston Churchill
The Thrill of the Grass - W.P. Kinsella
from Night - Elie Wiesel
This Too Is Everything - Shu Ting
A Marriage Proposal - Anton Chekhov
There's plenty more reading assignments in the book. If you can help me but need more choices let me know. Thanks
.
Write a one-paragraph summary of this article.Riordan, B. C..docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-paragraph summary of this article.
Riordan, B. C., Flett, J. A. M., Hunter, J. A., Scarf, D., & Conner, T. S. (2015). Fear of missing out (FoMO): the relationship between FoMO, alcohol use, and alcohol-related consequences in college students.
Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Functions
,
2
(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.7243/2055-3447-2-9
.
Write a one-paragraph response to the following topic. Use the MLA f.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-paragraph response to the following topic. Use the MLA format, and do not write in the first or second person. In addition, do not use contractions. Give specific details and examples to support your stance.
Many people in America still struggle with the concept of interracial dating. Is dating people of other races a sign of tolerance or of self-hatred? Should individuals date within their own race as a show of cultural pride or date other races as a way of combating racism and moving closer to equality? Originate your own ideas with vivid details and examples to support your stance. No secondary sources should be included in this response.
.
Write a one-page rhetorical analysis in which you analyze the argume.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-page rhetorical analysis in which you analyze the argument in the passage from “The Crisis” through three lenses:
•Identify the parts of his argument and explain how they work together to build an effective argument
•Identify and explain the impact of persuasive techniques
•Explain how Paine “enters the conversation” about the topic in his argument
.
Write a one pageliterature review of your figure( FIGURE A.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page
literature review of your figure
( FIGURE ASSIGNED 6 d-g)
Abstract: What is the question they were trying to answer, and what were their overall conclusions
Introduction: Introduce, briefly, the endomembrane system and how proteins move back and forth. Describe the importance of the KDEL sequence. What is the question they are trying to answer in your figure? How does this question relate to the larger context of the whole paper?
Body: What technique are they using? Briefly describe the technique. For each experiment tell me specifically what the variables are from that technique for that experiment (so which antibody are they using, and how did they prepare the samples) . How can that particular antibody or preparation help them to answer their question. What were their observations? What do they see?
Conclusions: What do they conclude from this figure or part of a figure?
This description, must be IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Focus, on the parts of the signaling cascade that they are trying to understand.
.
Write a one page-paper documenting the problemneed you wish to .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page-paper documenting the problem/need you wish to address for the
Community Need Project Proposal, due in Week 6
, and the important stakeholders related to your project. Why is this a need in your community? Who is involved in this problem and why are they important?
homelessness in San Antonio TX
.
Write a one page report on Chapter 1 and 2 with the same style of mo.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page report on Chapter 1 and 2 with the same style of module 1 assignment and it's requirement. Please add subtitle to your paper including a name for your paper, major topics under consideration, conclusion (a paragraph of personal
experience
) and a reference list. Keep your citations and references as a evidence for the midterm and final.
.
Write a one page reflection about the following1) Identify .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page reflection about the following:
1) Identify the key messages about being female that you saw in tv and magazine adds, including movies.
2) Do you feel the media/images affect both sexes the same? If not, why not?
3) Have you found your sense of self affected by media images? In what ways?
.
Write a one page paper on the question belowSome of the current.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page paper on the question below:
Some of the current trends in the delivery of value (channels, logistics, supply chain) include e-commerce; VMS; use of multi-channel approaches; mobile commerce; social retailing; and more. From your own research, discuss how two companies are using are using these techniques to improve their delivery of value to consumers.
.
Write a one page paper (double spaced) describing and discussing the.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page paper (double spaced) describing and discussing the following ethical concepts found in chapter 1; logical, factual and normative. You may use definitions or scenarios in your writing. The goal of this paper is to gain a level of understanding of all three (logical, factual and normative).
Textbook:
1.
Logical, or formal, statements
are definitions or statements derivable from
definitions, including the entirety of mathematical discourse (e.g., “2
+
2
=
4,”
or “A square has four equal sides”). Such statements can be
verified by a for
-
mal procedure
(“recourse to arithmetic”) derived from the same definitions
that control the rest of the terms of the field in question (i.e., the same axioms
define “2,” “4,” and the procedure of “addition”; the four equal sides and right
angles define the “square”). True formal statements are
analytic
:
they are true
logically, necessarily, or by the definitions of the terms
. False statements in
this category are
self–contradictory
. (If you say, “2
+
2
=
5,” or start talking
about “round squares,” you contradict yourself, for you assert that which can-
not possibly be so—you conjoin ideas that are incompatible). A logically true
or logically valid statement can never be false, or disproved by any discovery
of facts; it will never be the case that some particular pairs of 2 do not add up
to 4, or some particular squares turn out to be circular—and if you think you’ve
found such a case, you’re wrong! “2
+
2
=
4” is true, and squares are equi-
lateral rectangles, as philosophers like to say,
in all possible worlds
. For this
reason we say that these statements are “
true a priori
”: we can know them to
be correct prior to any examination of the facts of the world, without having to
count up lots of pairs of pairs, just to make sure that 2
+
2 really equals 4.
2.
Factual, or empirical, statements
are assertions about the world out there, the
physical environment of our existence, including the entirety of scientific dis-
course, from theoretical physics to sociology. Such statements are
verifiable by
controlled observation
(“recourse to measurement,” “recourse to weighing”)
of that world, by experiment or just by careful looking, listening, touching,
smelling, or tasting. This is the world of our senses, the world of space, objects,
time and causation. These empirical statements are called
synthetic,
for they
“put together” in a new combination two ideas that do not initially include or
entail each other. As a result they cannot be known a priori, but can be deter
-
mined only
a posteriori, that is, after investigation of the world
. When they
are true, they are
true only contingently, or dependently, as oppo.
write a one page about this topic and provide a reference.Will.docxedgar6wallace88877
write a one page about this topic and provide a reference.
Will making changes to the built environments (adding parks, sidewalks, healthy food stores, playgrounds, green-spaces, safer streets, etc.) of low-income neighborhoods be adequate enough to help community members combat health disparities based upon income or race? Why or why not?
.
Write a one or more paragraph on the following question below.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one or more paragraph on the following question below:
The three characteristics required by an individual to be considered a dependent of another taxpayer by the IRS.
The four tests stipulated by the IRS that a taxpayer must satisfy to claim a dependent as a qualifying child
What do you think are the reasons the IRS included the four tests for a qualifying child to be claimed as a dependent?
.
Write a one or more page paper on the following belowWhy are .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one or more page paper on the following below:
Why are systems for collaboration and social business so important and what technologies do they use? Explain the benefits of collaboration and social business. Describe what organizational culture is necessary for business processes and collaboration.
.
Write a one page dialogue in which two characters are arguing but .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page dialogue in which two characters are arguing but are speaking every thought, every iteration of subtext. Then go back and cut the dialogue so that no line is longer than five words without losing any of the meaning.
1. I'd like for you to submit both versions of your dialog.
The first version (with all the subtext written out) and the second version (with only 5 words per line.)
2. Be sure to write it in dialog format.
That means it should look like the plays in our text--
James: Starting with the character's name?
Carrie: And with little or no narration outside of the dialog?
Prof.: Yes to both questions!
3. Notice how little narration / stage direction there is in most of the sample dialogs.
Your dialog should be almost entirely dialog!
Try to resist the urge to get carried away explaining every little detail of what the characters are doing.
And resist the urge to add modifiers like (angrily) (with great emotion) (etc.) before each line of dialog.
You want to put everything into the dialog itself-- the emotion should be obvious from what the characters say!
.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research SocietyEngineering Hoov.docx
1. Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
Engineering: Hoover Dam
Author(s): Henry Petroski
Reviewed work(s):
Source: American Scientist, Vol. 81, No. 6 (November-
December 1993), pp. 517-521
Published by: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29775051 .
Accessed: 06/01/2013 08:28
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the
Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars,
researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information
technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new
forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please
contact [email protected]
.
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society is collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to American Scientist.
http://www.jstor.org
2. This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sigm
axi
http://www.jstor.org/stable/29775051?origin=JSTOR-pdf
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
Hoover Dam
Henry Petroski
Everything seems to move slowly at Hoover
Dam. Long lines of cars, buses and trucks in
low gear wind along the two-lane road
down one steep side of Black Canyon and up the
other. The lines stop frequently as carloads of
tourists crane their necks at the grandeur of the
site, and drivers search for a parking space
among the tiers of overlooks. For all the conges?
tion, few motorists seem impatient or interested
in searching maps for alternate routes. Everyone
driving in this vicinity must know that U.S. High?
way 95, which arcs along the crest of the dam, is
the only road across the Colorado River between
Davis Dam, over 50 miles to the south, and Nava
jo Bridge, over 150 miles to the east.
Pedestrians move about the top of the dam at a
snail's pace in the desert heat, crisscrossing the
3. crest over which, by design, no water has ever
flowed. Several thousand tourists may visit
Hoover Dam on a summer day, most of them
standing in long lines to board the large elevator
that takes them, 20 at a time, 600 feet down into
the inner workings of the dam. Many come from
Las Vegas, 35 miles to the northwest. Even there,
amid all the noise and neon, a visit to Hoover
Dam is hawked as one of the area's must-do
things. The pitch may be engineering achieve?
ment as awesome entertainment, but few who
visit the works at Black Canyon seem disappoint?
ed by the decided calmness and harmony of it all.
Just as the Mississippi River wreaked havoc in
the Midwest last summer, so the Colorado River
used to be alternately a blessing and a bane for
the Southwest. Although the Colorado seemed a
potential source of water for irrigation in rich but
arid regions such as Arizona and southern Cali?
fornia, it did not provide a consistent supply of
water. It often flooded low-lying lands in the
spring and early summer and then slowed to a
trickle during late summer and early fall. When?
ever crops, cattle and Californians were not
awash, they went thirsty.
Two promising regions with rich alluvial soil
were the Colorado Desert and the below-sea-lev?
4. el Salton Sink. Near the turn of the century they
were renamed Imperial Valley by land developers
who promised through their California Develop?
ment Company (CDC) to supply enough water
from the Colorado to make the otherwise arid
land attractive. For a few years the scheme
worked and the region was booming, but soon
the CDC's irrigation canal silted up and, in the
face of lawsuits from landowners, a new way to
divert the Colorado's water had to be found
quickly. A hastily engineered scheme?one that
also blunted the impact of the newly formed Bu?
reau of Reclamation's charge that CDC had mo?
nopolized the water supply?brought water up
from Mexico. That worked fine at first, but in 1905
so much water came down the Colorado in
spring and fall floods that the river changed its
course and flowed into the Salton Sink, which
then became the inland Salton Sea. Lost crops,
lost topsoil and a lost irrigation system amount?
ing to millions of dollars presented a disastrous
prospect for Imperial Valley. It was two years be?
fore the Colorado was put back on course, but the
root problems associated with both exploitation
of and protection from the river remained.
The great amount of silt carried southward by
the Colorado kept raising the river's channel, and
so required constant maintenance of the protec?
5. tive levees and other components of the irriga?
tion system, much of which was located in Mexi?
co. Problems with getting work crews back and
forth across the border led eventually to support
for a new canal located entirely on American soil.
It was in such a climate that a young lawyer
named Phil Swing, supported by southern-Cali?
fornia water interests, was sent in 1917 to repre?
sent them in Congress and to promote the idea of
an "All-American Canal."
Swing's effectiveness led quickly to the intro?
duction of legislation, but the proposal was de?
feated largely because of the opposition of Arthur
Powell Davis, a 40-year veteran of government
service who knew about as much about the Col?
orado River basin as anyone. Davis, nephew of
the Colorado canyon's explorer, John Wesley
Powell, had served as chief hydrographer when a
Panama Canal route was under investigation and
as an engineer with the U.S. Reclamation Service
since its origins in 1902. The driving force behind
the design and construction of many dams and ir?
rigation canals, he was director of the Reclama?
tion Service when the All-American Canal bill
1993 November-December
Henry Petroski is the Aleksandar S. Vesic Professor and chair?
man of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
at Duke University, Durham, NC 27706.
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
6. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
Figure 1. Hoover Dam photographed in 1990. (All photographs
courtesy of the Bureau of Reclamation.)
came before the Congress. He argued successfully
for that bill's defeat in 1919 so that a more com?
prehensive and long-range plan for the Colorado
might be explored first.
A Grand Plan
Years earlier, as a supervising engineer in the
Reclamation Service, Davis had thought about a
grand plan for the entire drainage system of the
Colorado. According to Joseph Stevens, who sub?
titled his telling of the story of Hoover Dam "an
American adventure," Davis's scheme was to be
"an undertaking to rival or even surpass in scale
and importance the construction of the Panama
Canal." Congressman Swing went further and
added the Pyramids, the Great Wall of China and
Solomon's temple to the list of feats of engineer?
ing that were less complicated than what came to
be known as the Boulder Dam Project. Congress
agreed that the great problem of the Colorado
basin should be studied by the Interior Depart?
ment, and its secretary, Albert Fall, assigned the
task to Davis's organization. The Fall-Davis Re?
7. port, issued in 1922, "contained an exhaustive hy
drological and geological profile of the Colorado
River and its canyons," but most attention was
drawn to its recommendation that the govern?
ment erect "at or near Boulder Canyon" a large
dam, which could generate power to repay in
time the construction expense.
Seven states?Arizona, California, Colorado,
New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming?
would be affected by the larger plan, and they
would first have to reach an agreement about their
respective claims to water. Conferences were held,
with the federal government represented by the
Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover, whom
Phil Swing claimed to have had a part in suggest?
ing as a "neutral" member of the Colorado River
Commission. It was Hoover who evidently broke
an impasse over state-by-state allocations by
proposing the establishment of Upper and Lower
Colorado River Basins, and this led all but one of
the states to agreement. According to Hoover, "a
blunderbuss of a governor in Arizona, who knew
nothing of engineering, bellowed that it would
'rob Arizona of its birthright/" After an amend?
ment required ratification by only six of the seven
affected states, the Colorado River Compact was
accomplished late in 1922.
A Boulder Canyon Project Act was introduced in
8. 1923 by Congressman Swing and California Sena?
tor Hiram Johnson, and it became the focus of bitter
debate inside and outside of Washington. The pub?
lisher of The Los Angeles Times, Harry Chandler, was
concerned about future irrigation for the almost one
million acres he owned just south of the Imperial
Valley in Mexico. On the other hand, William Ran?
dolph Hearst of San Francisco, Chandler's Califor?
nia newspaper rival, favored the bill. The saga of
518 American Scientist, Volume 81
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
the Swing-Johnson legislation's debate through sev?
eral sessions of Congress has been written about in
detail, mostly from Congressman Swing's perspec?
tive, by Beverley Moeller. The legislative struggle fi?
nally came to an end when President Calvin
Coolidge signed the bill into law in December 1928.
Even before the first Swing-Johnson bill was in?
troduced, the Reclamation Service had begun de?
tailed explorations of possible dam sites. When the
Fell-Davis report was written, the choices had been
narrowed down to five possible sites in Boulder
Canyon and two sites about 20 miles downstream
9. in Black Canyon. Boulder Canyon's foundation
was already known to be granite, a preferred rock,
whereas Black Canyon's was volcanic tuff (com?
pacted ash), so Davis used the language "at or near
Boulder Canyon" in the report. Further investiga?
tion, however, revealed that the lower site at Black
Canyon was indeed the best of the lot. Among oth?
er factors, there was less jointing and faulting, less
silt and debris to be removed, easier prospects for
tunneling and a narrower gorge that equated to a
need for less concrete. Furthermore, beds of sand
and gravel for use in the concrete were located
nearby, the potential reservoir was larger and
nearby Las Vegas provided comparatively easy ac?
cess to the canyon.
Designing the Dam
In addition to a site for the dam, the details of the
design itself had to be specified. As with all engi?
neering structures, judgment was employed to ar?
rive at initial alternative geometries, which were
then subjected to successively more-refined de?
grees of analysis until a final design emerged.
About 30 geometries were investigated at the
Denver office of the Bureau of Reclamation, as the
Service had been renamed, and its engineers sub
jected the hypothesized dams to analyses of
stresses, including those that would result from
10. the cooling and contraction of the concrete as it
cured. As was customary in the days before digi?
tal computers, models (rubber and plaster, in this
case) were employed to guide and check theory
and hand calculations. Initial specifications called
for stresses no higher than 30 tons per square foot
anywhere in the dam. In the end this proved to be
difficult to meet, and stresses up to 40 tons per
square foot were allowed in the final design. This
is equivalent to about 550 pounds per square
inch, which is well below the compressive
strength of even common concrete, thus provid?
ing a considerable factor of safety against the pos?
sibility that the dam would fail by being crushed
under its own weight or under the pressure of
water it had to resist.
Although similar in vertical cross section to a
gravity dam (one whose sheer weight prevents it
from being tipped over or pushed downstream
by the water), Hoover Dam acts principally as an
arch dam, transferring the pressure of the water
behind it to the walls of the canyon, which act
like abutments. The great height of the dam,
about 725 feet above bedrock, and the consequent
weight of the concrete, requires its transverse pro?
file to spread like a gravity dam from 45 feet at
the crest to 660 feet at the base. The structural in?
tegrity of the dam was a matter of some debate
when the plans were first revealed by Elwood
11. Mead, then Commissioner of Reclamation, in a
1930 article in Civil Engineering.
Mead outlined succinctly some "extraordinary
problems met in design" in a paragraph that
showed a sensitivity to scale effects and design
philosophy that were essential to producing a
successful outcome:
In designing a dam more than 700 ft. in
height, stress factors become very important,
which in the design of dams of nominal size
are comparatively insignificant. Possible errors
in basic design assumptions must be carefully
studied and checked; the physical properties
and volumetric changes of so great a mass of
concrete must be carefully deteirnined; prima?
ry stresses caused by the weight of the materi?
als and the horizontal water pressure must be
accurately calculated, as well as secondary
stresses due to all possible causes.
Mead did not elaborate on such technical mat?
ters, however, and soon an article by M. H. Gerry,
Jr., a consulting engineer from San Francisco, ap
Figure 2. Boulder City, shown in 1934, housed the construction
workers.
1993 November-December 519
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
12. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
^^^^
Figure 3. Hoover Dam under construction in December, 1933,
reveal?
ing the interlocking cells.
peared in Civil Engineering, challenging the safety
and stability of the dam. Letters challenging the
challenger followed, and about a year after Com?
missioner Mead's article, Harald M. Westergaard, a
stmctural-engmeering professor at the University
of Illinois and consultant to the Bureau, published
"Safety of Hoover Dam," in which he discounted
Gerry's misinterpretation of structural principles
and declared that, "It is the business of the struc?
tural engineer to imagine each undesirable thing
that might happen to the structure and provide
against that." Westergaard and the Bureau engi?
neers had felt they had done just that before Mead
transmitted to the Secretary of the Interior specifi?
cations and drawings for the dam, power plant
and appurtenant works. These were approved in
late 1930, and construction bids were invited.
Building the Dam
In his memorandum of December 15,1930, trans?
mitting dam specifications, Mead reminded the
13. Secretary of the Interior that the Depression had
created very great "pressure for action on this
matter, as a means of finriishing employment and
encouraging a revival of business." The specifi?
cations spelled out various conditions that were
related to these economic concerns, including that
employment preference be given to ex-service?
men and citizens and that, specifically, "no Mon?
golian labor shall be employed." Other non-tech?
nical conditions required that Boulder City be
created 23 miles southeast of Las Vegas and close
to the canyon as a construction camp site. Al?
though bid specifications stated that buildings
erected in Boulder City were to have "a reason?
ably attractive appearance and no unpainted
shanties or tar paper shacks will be permitted/'
and even though there was much to be admired
in the planning and construction of the town, 60
years later Stevens would relate many stories of
shameful working conditions at Black Canyon.
Bids were due in Denver on March 4,1931, but
few construction companies had the experience
or resources, including the five-million-dollar
bond, required to compete. The successful bid?
ding scheme was put together by a group named
14. for the task, Six Companies, Inc. It comprised:
Utah Construction Co., Pacific Bridge Co., Kaiser
Paving Co., MacDonald-Kahn Construction Co.,
Morrison-Knudsen Co. and J. F. Shea Co. Each of
the partner firms naturally had its own expertise,
and Morrison-Knudsen included "America's
foremost dam builder," Frank T. Crowe.
A 1905 civil-engineering graduate of the Uni?
versity of Maine, Crowe had gained cutting-edge
experience in building high, concrete dams while
he worked for the Bureau of Reclamation. After al?
most 20 years in the field, he was offered and took
a desk job as general superintendent of construc?
tion for the Bureau, but he quit after a year to join
the Morrison-Knudsen Company so that he could
once again engage directly in dam building. It was
Crowe who spearheaded the effort to come up
with a bid figure for the Boulder Canyon Project,
and he presented it to Six Companies representa?
tives at a meeting early in February at the Engi?
neers Club of San Francisco. When the bids were
opened in Denver the next month, Six Companies'
low bid of just under $49 million was within five
hundredths of one percent of the price tag esti?
mated by engineers at the Bureau of Reclamation.
The contract remained, until World War II, the
largest ever awarded by the government.
In order to build the dam proper, the river had
to be diverted through tunnels driven through
15. the canyon walls. An upstream diversion dam,
which had to be built between the annual floods,
and a downstream coffer dam would keep the
construction site dry. After the main dam was
completed, most of the diversion tunnels would
be blocked off, but some parts would be incorpo?
rated into the system of penstocks that would
feed the turbines in the hydroelectric power plant.
After about two years, the river bottom had been
cleared to bedrock, and the first forms to receive
concrete were erected. The pouring of concrete
began on June 6, 1933, and continued day and
night over the next two years. Three million cubic
yards of concrete, from two specially built mixing
plants, were distributed among cube-like cells
that interlock in the completed dam. Cooling
pipes embedded five feet apart throughout the
concrete carried away the heat of hydration; oth?
erwise, the dam would still be cooling down and
520 American Scientist, Volume 81
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
developing cracks as the concrete contracted. The
completed dam was turned over to the govern?
16. ment on March 1, 1936, more than two years
ahead of schedule, and energy began to be pro?
duced by the power plant that fall.
The dam was dedicated on September 30,1935,
by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. First to speak at
the ceremony was his Secretary of the Interior,
Harold Ickes, who, after repeatedly referring to the
structure as Boulder Dam, declared, "This great en?
gineering achievement should not carry the name
of any living man but, on the contrary, should be
baptized with a designation as bold and character?
istic and imagination stirring as the dam itself." He
was implying that the dam should not be named
after Hoover, who was, of course, still alive. Ickes
had in fact reopened a debate over the name of the
dam that went back to an earlier dedication cere?
mony, one that acknowledged Congress's first ap?
propriations for the entire Boulder Canyon Project
with the driving of a spike of Nevada silver for the
rail line that was to connect the construction site
with the Union Pacific Railroad in Las Vegas. At
that ceremony, Ray Wilbur, the Secretary of the In?
terior under President Hoover, who signed the bill,
had asserted, to the surprise of many in attendance,
"I have the honor to name this dam after a great
engineer who really started this greatest project of
all times, the Hoover Dam."
From the beginning, then, the name of the dam
17. was a contentious and confusing issue. In 1939,
the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
readopted Hoover Dam for use in society publi?
cations, pointing to correspondence between Sec?
retary Ickes and Attorney General Homer Cum
mings. Cummings declared the name Hoover
Dam to be official, because of its use in the appro?
priations bill and government contracts for the
dam, as opposed to the collective Boulder
Canyon Project, which included also the power
plant and appurtenant works. In 1947, the Re?
publican 80th Congress, called "do-nothing" by
President Harry Truman, passed legislation rein?
stating the name Hoover Dam. Whatever its
name, more than 27 million people have visited
the dam over the years, and there appears to be
general agreement with a plaque?placed near
the center of the crest by the ASCE in 1955?de?
claring the dam to be one of the country's Seven
Modern Civil Engineering Wonders.
Bibliography
Bureau of Reclamation. 1930. Hoover Dam, Power Plant and
Ap?
purtenant Works: Specifications, Schedule, and Drawings.
Wash?
18. ington, D.C.: United States Department of the Interior.
Hoover, Herbert. 1952. Memoirs: The Cabinet and the Presi?
dency, 1920-1933. New York: Macmillan.
Mead, Elwood. 1930. Hoover Dam. Civil Engineering Octo?
ber: 3-8.
Moeller, Beverley Bowen. 1971. Phil Swing and Boulder Dam.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stevens, Joseph E. 1988. Hoover Dam: An American Adven?
ture. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
SURFACE III
For reliable gridding,
kriging, and contour?
ing of data. Includes
trend-surface calcula?
tions, data point or
vector postings, and
overlays of geographic
annotation. Menu
based interface.
97.0 96.8 96 6 96.4 962
For Macintosh... standard version $249,
III+ ver. with kriging, faulting $399.
19. government/academic price for III+ $329.
For UNIX... single seat license $ 1,995,
government/academic price $995.
Available for Sparc, AViiON, RS/6000, SGI.
For details and a copy of our newsletter, write to
Kansas Geological Survey; SURFACE III office;
1930 Constant Ave.; Lawrence, KS 66047-3726
Fax 913 864-5317; Ph. 800 827-4844
Circle 19 on Reader Service Card
BURN YOUR REFERENCE CARDS!
REF-11
Computerizes your REFERENCES
Prepares your BIBLIOGRAPHIES
Inserts CITATIONS into your papers
? Maintains a data base of references
Q Searches for any combination of fields (authors,
keywords, title, journal, year, etc.)
Q Formats bibliographies exactly as you want them
Q Reads your paper, inserts citations where you want
them in the paper, and prepares a bibliography of
the references cited
? Downloads references from any on-line data base
including NLM, BRS, DIALOG and CD-ROM
20. formats (optional)
MS-DOS and WINDOWS.$195.??
VAX/VMS.$650.??
?
Any Manual & Demo.$20.??
322 Prospect Ave., Hartford, CT 06106
(203) 247-8500
Connecticut residents add 6% sales tax
Circle 11 on Reader Service Card
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jspArticle
Contentsp. 517p. 518p. 519p. 520p. [521]Issue Table of
ContentsAmerican Scientist, Vol. 81, No. 6 (November-
December 1993), pp. 506-616Front MatterLetters to the Editors
[pp. 507-509]Computing Science: Balanced on a Pencil Point
[pp. 510-516]Engineering: Hoover Dam [pp. 517-
521]Marginalia: Northern Exposures [pp. 522-525]SCIENCE
OBSERVERNO STOCK IN SMALLPOX VIRUS? [pp. 526-
527]WHAT MAKES PERMAFROST PERMANENT? [pp. 527-
528]SPIRAL HEARTBREAK [pp. 528-529]Recent Animal
Extinctions: Recipes for Disaster [pp. 530-541]Ethical Problems
in Academic Research [pp. 542-553]Directed Evolution
Reconsidered [pp. 554-561]Theory of Moves [pp. 562-570]The
Crisis in Russian Physics [pp. 571-579]The Scientists'
BookshelfScience Books for Young Readers [pp. 580-
588]Physical SciencesReview: untitled [pp. 589-589]Review:
untitled [pp. 589-590]Review: untitled [pp. 590-590]Review:
untitled [pp. 590-591]Earth SciencesReview: untitled [pp. 591-
21. 592]Review: untitled [pp. 592-592]Life SciencesReview:
untitled [pp. 592-593]Review: untitled [pp. 593-594]Review:
untitled [pp. 594-595]Review: untitled [pp. 595-595]Review:
untitled [pp. 595-596]Behavioral SciencesReview: untitled [pp.
596-598]Review: untitled [pp. 598-598]Review: untitled [pp.
598-599]Mathematics and Computer SciencesReview: untitled
[pp. 599-599]Review: untitled [pp. 599-600]Engineering and
Applied SciencesReview: untitled [pp. 600-600]Review:
untitled [pp. 600-601]Science History, Philosophy and
PolicyReview: untitled [pp. 601-602]Review: untitled [pp. 602-
602]Sigma Xi National Lecturers, 1994—1995 [pp. 603-
611]Sigma Xi Today: NOVEMBER 1993 · VOLUME 2,
NUMBER 3 [pp. 613-616]Back Matter
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
Engineering: Hoover Dam
Author(s): Henry Petroski
Reviewed work(s):
Source: American Scientist, Vol. 81, No. 6 (November-
December 1993), pp. 517-521
Published by: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29775051 .
Accessed: 06/01/2013 08:28
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the
Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars,
researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information
22. technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new
forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please
contact [email protected]
.
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society is collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to American Scientist.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sigm
axi
http://www.jstor.org/stable/29775051?origin=JSTOR-pdf
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
Hoover Dam
Henry Petroski
Everything seems to move slowly at Hoover
Dam. Long lines of cars, buses and trucks in
low gear wind along the two-lane road
down one steep side of Black Canyon and up the
other. The lines stop frequently as carloads of
tourists crane their necks at the grandeur of the
site, and drivers search for a parking space
among the tiers of overlooks. For all the conges?
23. tion, few motorists seem impatient or interested
in searching maps for alternate routes. Everyone
driving in this vicinity must know that U.S. High?
way 95, which arcs along the crest of the dam, is
the only road across the Colorado River between
Davis Dam, over 50 miles to the south, and Nava
jo Bridge, over 150 miles to the east.
Pedestrians move about the top of the dam at a
snail's pace in the desert heat, crisscrossing the
crest over which, by design, no water has ever
flowed. Several thousand tourists may visit
Hoover Dam on a summer day, most of them
standing in long lines to board the large elevator
that takes them, 20 at a time, 600 feet down into
the inner workings of the dam. Many come from
Las Vegas, 35 miles to the northwest. Even there,
amid all the noise and neon, a visit to Hoover
Dam is hawked as one of the area's must-do
things. The pitch may be engineering achieve?
ment as awesome entertainment, but few who
visit the works at Black Canyon seem disappoint?
ed by the decided calmness and harmony of it all.
Just as the Mississippi River wreaked havoc in
the Midwest last summer, so the Colorado River
used to be alternately a blessing and a bane for
the Southwest. Although the Colorado seemed a
potential source of water for irrigation in rich but
arid regions such as Arizona and southern Cali?
24. fornia, it did not provide a consistent supply of
water. It often flooded low-lying lands in the
spring and early summer and then slowed to a
trickle during late summer and early fall. When?
ever crops, cattle and Californians were not
awash, they went thirsty.
Two promising regions with rich alluvial soil
were the Colorado Desert and the below-sea-lev?
el Salton Sink. Near the turn of the century they
were renamed Imperial Valley by land developers
who promised through their California Develop?
ment Company (CDC) to supply enough water
from the Colorado to make the otherwise arid
land attractive. For a few years the scheme
worked and the region was booming, but soon
the CDC's irrigation canal silted up and, in the
face of lawsuits from landowners, a new way to
divert the Colorado's water had to be found
quickly. A hastily engineered scheme?one that
also blunted the impact of the newly formed Bu?
reau of Reclamation's charge that CDC had mo?
nopolized the water supply?brought water up
from Mexico. That worked fine at first, but in 1905
so much water came down the Colorado in
spring and fall floods that the river changed its
course and flowed into the Salton Sink, which
then became the inland Salton Sea. Lost crops,
25. lost topsoil and a lost irrigation system amount?
ing to millions of dollars presented a disastrous
prospect for Imperial Valley. It was two years be?
fore the Colorado was put back on course, but the
root problems associated with both exploitation
of and protection from the river remained.
The great amount of silt carried southward by
the Colorado kept raising the river's channel, and
so required constant maintenance of the protec?
tive levees and other components of the irriga?
tion system, much of which was located in Mexi?
co. Problems with getting work crews back and
forth across the border led eventually to support
for a new canal located entirely on American soil.
It was in such a climate that a young lawyer
named Phil Swing, supported by southern-Cali?
fornia water interests, was sent in 1917 to repre?
sent them in Congress and to promote the idea of
an "All-American Canal."
Swing's effectiveness led quickly to the intro?
duction of legislation, but the proposal was de?
feated largely because of the opposition of Arthur
Powell Davis, a 40-year veteran of government
service who knew about as much about the Col?
orado River basin as anyone. Davis, nephew of
the Colorado canyon's explorer, John Wesley
Powell, had served as chief hydrographer when a
Panama Canal route was under investigation and
as an engineer with the U.S. Reclamation Service
since its origins in 1902. The driving force behind
the design and construction of many dams and ir?
26. rigation canals, he was director of the Reclama?
tion Service when the All-American Canal bill
1993 November-December
Henry Petroski is the Aleksandar S. Vesic Professor and chair?
man of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
at Duke University, Durham, NC 27706.
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
Figure 1. Hoover Dam photographed in 1990. (All photographs
courtesy of the Bureau of Reclamation.)
came before the Congress. He argued successfully
for that bill's defeat in 1919 so that a more com?
prehensive and long-range plan for the Colorado
might be explored first.
A Grand Plan
Years earlier, as a supervising engineer in the
Reclamation Service, Davis had thought about a
grand plan for the entire drainage system of the
Colorado. According to Joseph Stevens, who sub?
titled his telling of the story of Hoover Dam "an
American adventure," Davis's scheme was to be
27. "an undertaking to rival or even surpass in scale
and importance the construction of the Panama
Canal." Congressman Swing went further and
added the Pyramids, the Great Wall of China and
Solomon's temple to the list of feats of engineer?
ing that were less complicated than what came to
be known as the Boulder Dam Project. Congress
agreed that the great problem of the Colorado
basin should be studied by the Interior Depart?
ment, and its secretary, Albert Fall, assigned the
task to Davis's organization. The Fall-Davis Re?
port, issued in 1922, "contained an exhaustive hy
drological and geological profile of the Colorado
River and its canyons," but most attention was
drawn to its recommendation that the govern?
ment erect "at or near Boulder Canyon" a large
dam, which could generate power to repay in
time the construction expense.
Seven states?Arizona, California, Colorado,
New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming?
would be affected by the larger plan, and they
would first have to reach an agreement about their
respective claims to water. Conferences were held,
with the federal government represented by the
Secretary of Commerce, Herbert Hoover, whom
Phil Swing claimed to have had a part in suggest?
ing as a "neutral" member of the Colorado River
Commission. It was Hoover who evidently broke
an impasse over state-by-state allocations by
proposing the establishment of Upper and Lower
Colorado River Basins, and this led all but one of
28. the states to agreement. According to Hoover, "a
blunderbuss of a governor in Arizona, who knew
nothing of engineering, bellowed that it would
'rob Arizona of its birthright/" After an amend?
ment required ratification by only six of the seven
affected states, the Colorado River Compact was
accomplished late in 1922.
A Boulder Canyon Project Act was introduced in
1923 by Congressman Swing and California Sena?
tor Hiram Johnson, and it became the focus of bitter
debate inside and outside of Washington. The pub?
lisher of The Los Angeles Times, Harry Chandler, was
concerned about future irrigation for the almost one
million acres he owned just south of the Imperial
Valley in Mexico. On the other hand, William Ran?
dolph Hearst of San Francisco, Chandler's Califor?
nia newspaper rival, favored the bill. The saga of
518 American Scientist, Volume 81
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
the Swing-Johnson legislation's debate through sev?
eral sessions of Congress has been written about in
detail, mostly from Congressman Swing's perspec?
tive, by Beverley Moeller. The legislative struggle fi?
29. nally came to an end when President Calvin
Coolidge signed the bill into law in December 1928.
Even before the first Swing-Johnson bill was in?
troduced, the Reclamation Service had begun de?
tailed explorations of possible dam sites. When the
Fell-Davis report was written, the choices had been
narrowed down to five possible sites in Boulder
Canyon and two sites about 20 miles downstream
in Black Canyon. Boulder Canyon's foundation
was already known to be granite, a preferred rock,
whereas Black Canyon's was volcanic tuff (com?
pacted ash), so Davis used the language "at or near
Boulder Canyon" in the report. Further investiga?
tion, however, revealed that the lower site at Black
Canyon was indeed the best of the lot. Among oth?
er factors, there was less jointing and faulting, less
silt and debris to be removed, easier prospects for
tunneling and a narrower gorge that equated to a
need for less concrete. Furthermore, beds of sand
and gravel for use in the concrete were located
nearby, the potential reservoir was larger and
nearby Las Vegas provided comparatively easy ac?
cess to the canyon.
Designing the Dam
In addition to a site for the dam, the details of the
30. design itself had to be specified. As with all engi?
neering structures, judgment was employed to ar?
rive at initial alternative geometries, which were
then subjected to successively more-refined de?
grees of analysis until a final design emerged.
About 30 geometries were investigated at the
Denver office of the Bureau of Reclamation, as the
Service had been renamed, and its engineers sub
jected the hypothesized dams to analyses of
stresses, including those that would result from
the cooling and contraction of the concrete as it
cured. As was customary in the days before digi?
tal computers, models (rubber and plaster, in this
case) were employed to guide and check theory
and hand calculations. Initial specifications called
for stresses no higher than 30 tons per square foot
anywhere in the dam. In the end this proved to be
difficult to meet, and stresses up to 40 tons per
square foot were allowed in the final design. This
is equivalent to about 550 pounds per square
inch, which is well below the compressive
strength of even common concrete, thus provid?
ing a considerable factor of safety against the pos?
sibility that the dam would fail by being crushed
under its own weight or under the pressure of
water it had to resist.
Although similar in vertical cross section to a
gravity dam (one whose sheer weight prevents it
from being tipped over or pushed downstream
31. by the water), Hoover Dam acts principally as an
arch dam, transferring the pressure of the water
behind it to the walls of the canyon, which act
like abutments. The great height of the dam,
about 725 feet above bedrock, and the consequent
weight of the concrete, requires its transverse pro?
file to spread like a gravity dam from 45 feet at
the crest to 660 feet at the base. The structural in?
tegrity of the dam was a matter of some debate
when the plans were first revealed by Elwood
Mead, then Commissioner of Reclamation, in a
1930 article in Civil Engineering.
Mead outlined succinctly some "extraordinary
problems met in design" in a paragraph that
showed a sensitivity to scale effects and design
philosophy that were essential to producing a
successful outcome:
In designing a dam more than 700 ft. in
height, stress factors become very important,
which in the design of dams of nominal size
are comparatively insignificant. Possible errors
in basic design assumptions must be carefully
studied and checked; the physical properties
and volumetric changes of so great a mass of
concrete must be carefully deteirnined; prima?
ry stresses caused by the weight of the materi?
als and the horizontal water pressure must be
accurately calculated, as well as secondary
stresses due to all possible causes.
32. Mead did not elaborate on such technical mat?
ters, however, and soon an article by M. H. Gerry,
Jr., a consulting engineer from San Francisco, ap
Figure 2. Boulder City, shown in 1934, housed the construction
workers.
1993 November-December 519
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
^^^^
Figure 3. Hoover Dam under construction in December, 1933,
reveal?
ing the interlocking cells.
peared in Civil Engineering, challenging the safety
and stability of the dam. Letters challenging the
challenger followed, and about a year after Com?
missioner Mead's article, Harald M. Westergaard, a
stmctural-engmeering professor at the University
of Illinois and consultant to the Bureau, published
"Safety of Hoover Dam," in which he discounted
Gerry's misinterpretation of structural principles
and declared that, "It is the business of the struc?
tural engineer to imagine each undesirable thing
33. that might happen to the structure and provide
against that." Westergaard and the Bureau engi?
neers had felt they had done just that before Mead
transmitted to the Secretary of the Interior specifi?
cations and drawings for the dam, power plant
and appurtenant works. These were approved in
late 1930, and construction bids were invited.
Building the Dam
In his memorandum of December 15,1930, trans?
mitting dam specifications, Mead reminded the
Secretary of the Interior that the Depression had
created very great "pressure for action on this
matter, as a means of finriishing employment and
encouraging a revival of business." The specifi?
cations spelled out various conditions that were
related to these economic concerns, including that
employment preference be given to ex-service?
men and citizens and that, specifically, "no Mon?
golian labor shall be employed." Other non-tech?
nical conditions required that Boulder City be
created 23 miles southeast of Las Vegas and close
to the canyon as a construction camp site. Al?
though bid specifications stated that buildings
erected in Boulder City were to have "a reason?
ably attractive appearance and no unpainted
shanties or tar paper shacks will be permitted/'
34. and even though there was much to be admired
in the planning and construction of the town, 60
years later Stevens would relate many stories of
shameful working conditions at Black Canyon.
Bids were due in Denver on March 4,1931, but
few construction companies had the experience
or resources, including the five-million-dollar
bond, required to compete. The successful bid?
ding scheme was put together by a group named
for the task, Six Companies, Inc. It comprised:
Utah Construction Co., Pacific Bridge Co., Kaiser
Paving Co., MacDonald-Kahn Construction Co.,
Morrison-Knudsen Co. and J. F. Shea Co. Each of
the partner firms naturally had its own expertise,
and Morrison-Knudsen included "America's
foremost dam builder," Frank T. Crowe.
A 1905 civil-engineering graduate of the Uni?
versity of Maine, Crowe had gained cutting-edge
experience in building high, concrete dams while
he worked for the Bureau of Reclamation. After al?
most 20 years in the field, he was offered and took
a desk job as general superintendent of construc?
tion for the Bureau, but he quit after a year to join
the Morrison-Knudsen Company so that he could
once again engage directly in dam building. It was
Crowe who spearheaded the effort to come up
with a bid figure for the Boulder Canyon Project,
and he presented it to Six Companies representa?
tives at a meeting early in February at the Engi?
35. neers Club of San Francisco. When the bids were
opened in Denver the next month, Six Companies'
low bid of just under $49 million was within five
hundredths of one percent of the price tag esti?
mated by engineers at the Bureau of Reclamation.
The contract remained, until World War II, the
largest ever awarded by the government.
In order to build the dam proper, the river had
to be diverted through tunnels driven through
the canyon walls. An upstream diversion dam,
which had to be built between the annual floods,
and a downstream coffer dam would keep the
construction site dry. After the main dam was
completed, most of the diversion tunnels would
be blocked off, but some parts would be incorpo?
rated into the system of penstocks that would
feed the turbines in the hydroelectric power plant.
After about two years, the river bottom had been
cleared to bedrock, and the first forms to receive
concrete were erected. The pouring of concrete
began on June 6, 1933, and continued day and
night over the next two years. Three million cubic
yards of concrete, from two specially built mixing
plants, were distributed among cube-like cells
that interlock in the completed dam. Cooling
pipes embedded five feet apart throughout the
concrete carried away the heat of hydration; oth?
erwise, the dam would still be cooling down and
36. 520 American Scientist, Volume 81
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
developing cracks as the concrete contracted. The
completed dam was turned over to the govern?
ment on March 1, 1936, more than two years
ahead of schedule, and energy began to be pro?
duced by the power plant that fall.
The dam was dedicated on September 30,1935,
by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. First to speak at
the ceremony was his Secretary of the Interior,
Harold Ickes, who, after repeatedly referring to the
structure as Boulder Dam, declared, "This great en?
gineering achievement should not carry the name
of any living man but, on the contrary, should be
baptized with a designation as bold and character?
istic and imagination stirring as the dam itself." He
was implying that the dam should not be named
after Hoover, who was, of course, still alive. Ickes
had in fact reopened a debate over the name of the
dam that went back to an earlier dedication cere?
mony, one that acknowledged Congress's first ap?
propriations for the entire Boulder Canyon Project
37. with the driving of a spike of Nevada silver for the
rail line that was to connect the construction site
with the Union Pacific Railroad in Las Vegas. At
that ceremony, Ray Wilbur, the Secretary of the In?
terior under President Hoover, who signed the bill,
had asserted, to the surprise of many in attendance,
"I have the honor to name this dam after a great
engineer who really started this greatest project of
all times, the Hoover Dam."
From the beginning, then, the name of the dam
was a contentious and confusing issue. In 1939,
the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
readopted Hoover Dam for use in society publi?
cations, pointing to correspondence between Sec?
retary Ickes and Attorney General Homer Cum
mings. Cummings declared the name Hoover
Dam to be official, because of its use in the appro?
priations bill and government contracts for the
dam, as opposed to the collective Boulder
Canyon Project, which included also the power
plant and appurtenant works. In 1947, the Re?
publican 80th Congress, called "do-nothing" by
President Harry Truman, passed legislation rein?
stating the name Hoover Dam. Whatever its
name, more than 27 million people have visited
the dam over the years, and there appears to be
general agreement with a plaque?placed near
38. the center of the crest by the ASCE in 1955?de?
claring the dam to be one of the country's Seven
Modern Civil Engineering Wonders.
Bibliography
Bureau of Reclamation. 1930. Hoover Dam, Power Plant and
Ap?
purtenant Works: Specifications, Schedule, and Drawings.
Wash?
ington, D.C.: United States Department of the Interior.
Hoover, Herbert. 1952. Memoirs: The Cabinet and the Presi?
dency, 1920-1933. New York: Macmillan.
Mead, Elwood. 1930. Hoover Dam. Civil Engineering Octo?
ber: 3-8.
Moeller, Beverley Bowen. 1971. Phil Swing and Boulder Dam.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stevens, Joseph E. 1988. Hoover Dam: An American Adven?
ture. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
SURFACE III
For reliable gridding,
kriging, and contour?
ing of data. Includes
trend-surface calcula?
39. tions, data point or
vector postings, and
overlays of geographic
annotation. Menu
based interface.
97.0 96.8 96 6 96.4 962
For Macintosh... standard version $249,
III+ ver. with kriging, faulting $399.
government/academic price for III+ $329.
For UNIX... single seat license $ 1,995,
government/academic price $995.
Available for Sparc, AViiON, RS/6000, SGI.
For details and a copy of our newsletter, write to
Kansas Geological Survey; SURFACE III office;
1930 Constant Ave.; Lawrence, KS 66047-3726
Fax 913 864-5317; Ph. 800 827-4844
Circle 19 on Reader Service Card
BURN YOUR REFERENCE CARDS!
REF-11
Computerizes your REFERENCES
Prepares your BIBLIOGRAPHIES
Inserts CITATIONS into your papers
? Maintains a data base of references
40. Q Searches for any combination of fields (authors,
keywords, title, journal, year, etc.)
Q Formats bibliographies exactly as you want them
Q Reads your paper, inserts citations where you want
them in the paper, and prepares a bibliography of
the references cited
? Downloads references from any on-line data base
including NLM, BRS, DIALOG and CD-ROM
formats (optional)
MS-DOS and WINDOWS.$195.??
VAX/VMS.$650.??
?
Any Manual & Demo.$20.??
322 Prospect Ave., Hartford, CT 06106
(203) 247-8500
Connecticut residents add 6% sales tax
Circle 11 on Reader Service Card
This content downloaded on Sun, 6 Jan 2013 08:28:00 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jspArticle
Contentsp. 517p. 518p. 519p. 520p. [521]Issue Table of
ContentsAmerican Scientist, Vol. 81, No. 6 (November-
December 1993), pp. 506-616Front MatterLetters to the Editors
[pp. 507-509]Computing Science: Balanced on a Pencil Point
[pp. 510-516]Engineering: Hoover Dam [pp. 517-
41. 521]Marginalia: Northern Exposures [pp. 522-525]SCIENCE
OBSERVERNO STOCK IN SMALLPOX VIRUS? [pp. 526-
527]WHAT MAKES PERMAFROST PERMANENT? [pp. 527-
528]SPIRAL HEARTBREAK [pp. 528-529]Recent Animal
Extinctions: Recipes for Disaster [pp. 530-541]Ethical Problems
in Academic Research [pp. 542-553]Directed Evolution
Reconsidered [pp. 554-561]Theory of Moves [pp. 562-570]The
Crisis in Russian Physics [pp. 571-579]The Scientists'
BookshelfScience Books for Young Readers [pp. 580-
588]Physical SciencesReview: untitled [pp. 589-589]Review:
untitled [pp. 589-590]Review: untitled [pp. 590-590]Review:
untitled [pp. 590-591]Earth SciencesReview: untitled [pp. 591-
592]Review: untitled [pp. 592-592]Life SciencesReview:
untitled [pp. 592-593]Review: untitled [pp. 593-594]Review:
untitled [pp. 594-595]Review: untitled [pp. 595-595]Review:
untitled [pp. 595-596]Behavioral SciencesReview: untitled [pp.
596-598]Review: untitled [pp. 598-598]Review: untitled [pp.
598-599]Mathematics and Computer SciencesReview: untitled
[pp. 599-599]Review: untitled [pp. 599-600]Engineering and
Applied SciencesReview: untitled [pp. 600-600]Review:
untitled [pp. 600-601]Science History, Philosophy and
PolicyReview: untitled [pp. 601-602]Review: untitled [pp. 602-
602]Sigma Xi National Lecturers, 1994—1995 [pp. 603-
611]Sigma Xi Today: NOVEMBER 1993 · VOLUME 2,
NUMBER 3 [pp. 613-616]Back Matter