This document summarizes a panel discussion on ResearchGate, a social media network for researchers. The panelists answered 7 questions about using ResearchGate and how it compares to other research networks. Key points addressed include: ResearchGate's business model and use of user data; copyright and open access issues; who uses ResearchGate; reliability of answers on the site; differences between ResearchGate and networks like Academia.edu and LinkedIn; issues with ResearchGate metrics and scores; and how to integrate ResearchGate with profiles on other sites like ORCID. The takeaway message is to focus engagement on networks where your target audience is active and to use ORCID to maintain a complete publication profile across sites.
This presentation was given at the UKICRS meeting (http://www.ukicrs.org/2015-symposium.html) on April 16th 2015. This presentation was in a workshop and focused on trying to inform attendees in the postgraduate phases of their careers how to use online tools to start building a reputation and profile in their field
Presentation on good practice publishing - covering ethics, authorship, access by Pippa Smart. Given by Rachael Lammey at Crossref LIVE in Brazil, Dec 16.
A presentation given at the ACS CINF Meeting in Denver on March 22nd 2015
The authoring of a scientific publication can represent the culmination of many tens if not 100s of hours of data collection and analysis. The authoring and peer-review process itself often represents a major undertaking in terms of assembling the publication and passing through review. Considering the amount of work invested in the production of a scientific article it is therefore quite surprising that authors, post-publication, invest very little effort in communicating the value and potential impact of their article to the community. Social networking has clearly demonstrated the ability to self-market and drive attention. At the same time, the increasing volume of literature (over a million new articles are published every year), requires authors to take on a more direct role in ensuring their work gets read and cited. This requirement may grow with the emergence of a range of metrics at the article level, shifting attention away from where a researcher publishes to the performance of their individual articles. Therefore, a separate platform to facilitate social networking and other discovery tools to communicate the value of published science to the community would be of value. In parallel the possibility to enhance an article by linking to additional information (presentations, videos, blog posts etc) allows for enrichment of the article post-publication, a capability not available via the publishers platform. This presentation will provide a personal overview of the experiences of using the Kudos Platform and how it ultimately benefits my ability to communicate an integrated view of my research to the community.
30+ Tips on how to improve your research impact : PhD Day 2016 Talk @UMCGGuus van den Brekel
Talk on PhD-Day 2016, September 16th 2016
Together with an overview of the worldwide ranking of universities, plus an insight in the “battle” for the researcher, you will get 30+ tips on how to possibly improve your research impact.
The tips will involve practical actions to be taken before ánd after publishing your research. Scientific communication does not stop áfter publishing your research paper. Many strategies can be used to draw attention to your research, to try and improve the reach, and possibly even, the impact of it long-term. Innovations in scholarly communications, like the use of alternative (web)tools, are changing the research environment. It needs an open and more pro-active role of the researcher.
The use of research profiles, author identifiers, open access & data, social media and altmetrics, are just a few topics that will be addressed in this talk.
This presentation was given at the UKICRS meeting (http://www.ukicrs.org/2015-symposium.html) on April 16th 2015. This presentation was in a workshop and focused on trying to inform attendees in the postgraduate phases of their careers how to use online tools to start building a reputation and profile in their field
Presentation on good practice publishing - covering ethics, authorship, access by Pippa Smart. Given by Rachael Lammey at Crossref LIVE in Brazil, Dec 16.
A presentation given at the ACS CINF Meeting in Denver on March 22nd 2015
The authoring of a scientific publication can represent the culmination of many tens if not 100s of hours of data collection and analysis. The authoring and peer-review process itself often represents a major undertaking in terms of assembling the publication and passing through review. Considering the amount of work invested in the production of a scientific article it is therefore quite surprising that authors, post-publication, invest very little effort in communicating the value and potential impact of their article to the community. Social networking has clearly demonstrated the ability to self-market and drive attention. At the same time, the increasing volume of literature (over a million new articles are published every year), requires authors to take on a more direct role in ensuring their work gets read and cited. This requirement may grow with the emergence of a range of metrics at the article level, shifting attention away from where a researcher publishes to the performance of their individual articles. Therefore, a separate platform to facilitate social networking and other discovery tools to communicate the value of published science to the community would be of value. In parallel the possibility to enhance an article by linking to additional information (presentations, videos, blog posts etc) allows for enrichment of the article post-publication, a capability not available via the publishers platform. This presentation will provide a personal overview of the experiences of using the Kudos Platform and how it ultimately benefits my ability to communicate an integrated view of my research to the community.
30+ Tips on how to improve your research impact : PhD Day 2016 Talk @UMCGGuus van den Brekel
Talk on PhD-Day 2016, September 16th 2016
Together with an overview of the worldwide ranking of universities, plus an insight in the “battle” for the researcher, you will get 30+ tips on how to possibly improve your research impact.
The tips will involve practical actions to be taken before ánd after publishing your research. Scientific communication does not stop áfter publishing your research paper. Many strategies can be used to draw attention to your research, to try and improve the reach, and possibly even, the impact of it long-term. Innovations in scholarly communications, like the use of alternative (web)tools, are changing the research environment. It needs an open and more pro-active role of the researcher.
The use of research profiles, author identifiers, open access & data, social media and altmetrics, are just a few topics that will be addressed in this talk.
Despite the availability of many platforms for scientists to connect and share with their peers in the scientific community the majority do not make use of these tools, despite their promise and potential impact and influence on our careers. We are already being indexed and exposed on the internet via our publications, presentations and data and new “AltMetric scores” are being assigned to scientific publications as measures of popularity and, supposedly, of impact. We now have even more ways to contribute to science, to annotate and curate data, to “publish” in new ways, and many of these activities are as part of a growing crowdsourcing network. This presentation provides an overview of the various types of networking and collaborative sites available to scientists and ways to expose your scientific activities online. It will discuss the new world of AltMetrics that is in an explosive growth curve and will help you understand how to influence and leverage some of these new measures. Participating online, whether it be simply for career advancement or for wider exposure of your research, there are now a series of web applications that can provide a great opportunity to develop a scientific profile within the community.
This session will examine new data environment concepts like ‘big data’ and ‘stream analytics’, and the impact of the new data environment on privacy (and related constructs) and how this will feed into the way we carry out research from data collection through to publication. This of course is not a fixed thing; the environment is in a constant state of change. Working out what is happening right now is a challenge and as for what will happen next …
Championing open science as an early career researcherJonathan Tennant
Presentation given at the Conference on Open Science in the European Research Area, Ljubljana, Slovania, November 2016. https://www.uni-lj.si/research_and_development/open_science/
This presentation first outlines five different aspects of impact. I then look at what we can learn from the measurement of academic impact, usually operationalised as citations. I show that four key recommendations for academic impact (multiple sources, multiple metrics, cross-disciplinary focus, and long term perspective) can be applied to non-academic impact as well. In addition, I argue that the four C's of citation impact (competence, communication, collaboration, and care) also apply to non-academic impact.
A presentation on predatory publishing, in the Information Interventions series, sponsored by the LACUNY Scholarly Communications Roundtable , the CUNY Office of Library Services, and Just Publics @ 365.
It is critical to understand the history and background of predatory publishing, a fairly recent phenomenon, whether you are an author or a librarian called upon to assess a publisher. This talk addresses the politics of Gold Open Access, the Bohannon "sting," and the issue of "third world-ism." Red herrings of predatory publishers are an especially useful aspect of this presentation.
ORCID iDs: Optimizing Research DiscoverabilityUCD Library
Presentation given by Michael Ladisch, Bibliographic Services Librarian at University College Dublin Library, Dublin Ireland at LIR Annual Seminar, March 21, 2014 in Dublin, Ireland.
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigour or credibility. This presentation will look at examples of publishers, publications and provide practical tips to identify and avoid predatory publishers.
The Royal Society of Chemistry hosts one of the worlds’ richest collections of online chemistry data that is free-to-access for the community. ChemSpider presently hosts over 30 million unique chemical compounds together with associated data and accessible via a number of search techniques. With almost 50,000 unique users per day from around the world the site offers scientists the ability to investigate the world of small molecules via property searches, analytical data and predictive models. The challenges associated with providing a similar platform for “materials” are manifold but, if they could be addressed, would offer a valuable service to the materials community. This presentation will provide an overview of how ChemSpider was built, our efforts to expand the capabilities to a more encompassing data repository and some of the challenges faced to embrace the diverse world of materials informatics and online data access.
30+ Tips how to improve your research impact : (presentation Scientific Writing course GSMS 2017)
Together with an overview of the worldwide ranking of universities, plus an insight in the “battle” for the researcher, you will get 30+ tips on how to possibly improve your research impact.
The tips will involve practical actions to be taken before ánd after publishing your research.
Scientific communication does not stop áfter publishing your research paper. Many strategies can be used to draw attention to your research, to try and improve the reach, and possibly even, the impact of it longterm. Innovations in scholarly communications, like the use of alternative (web)tools, are changing the research environment. It needs an open and more pro-active role of the researcher.
The use of research profiles, author identifiers, open access & data, social media and altmetrics, are just a few topics that will be addressed in this talk.
Predatory publishing: what it is and how to avoid itUQSCADS
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigor or credibility.
This presentation provides researchers with
an insight into predatory behaviors and and how they can avoid them.
Predatory journals: Why you should not publish your manuscript in a predatory journal, and how to spot a predatory journal. Visit here: https://bit.ly/2wKX7tr
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibilityEileen Shepherd
Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics or article level metrics). Altmetrics measures impact of research, data and publications, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media. This presentation gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution. (Rhodes University is in Grahamstown, South Africa)
ResearchGate在2008年由 Dr. Ijad Madisch, Dr. Sören Hofmayer, Horst Fickenscher成立,是一個科學家與研究者的Facebook or LinkedIn。
ResearchGate讓科學家與研究者分享論文、詢答問題、找尋合作者,鼓勵分享成功或失敗的實驗與研究數據。目前ResearchGate有近四百萬的註冊使用者,比爾蓋茲也投資了美金3,500萬元。
這是一份關於ResearchGate介面的簡單說明文件。ResearchGate的操作還算簡單,但重點在於學者是否能利用這些功能創造(學術研究)上的價值
Despite the availability of many platforms for scientists to connect and share with their peers in the scientific community the majority do not make use of these tools, despite their promise and potential impact and influence on our careers. We are already being indexed and exposed on the internet via our publications, presentations and data and new “AltMetric scores” are being assigned to scientific publications as measures of popularity and, supposedly, of impact. We now have even more ways to contribute to science, to annotate and curate data, to “publish” in new ways, and many of these activities are as part of a growing crowdsourcing network. This presentation provides an overview of the various types of networking and collaborative sites available to scientists and ways to expose your scientific activities online. It will discuss the new world of AltMetrics that is in an explosive growth curve and will help you understand how to influence and leverage some of these new measures. Participating online, whether it be simply for career advancement or for wider exposure of your research, there are now a series of web applications that can provide a great opportunity to develop a scientific profile within the community.
This session will examine new data environment concepts like ‘big data’ and ‘stream analytics’, and the impact of the new data environment on privacy (and related constructs) and how this will feed into the way we carry out research from data collection through to publication. This of course is not a fixed thing; the environment is in a constant state of change. Working out what is happening right now is a challenge and as for what will happen next …
Championing open science as an early career researcherJonathan Tennant
Presentation given at the Conference on Open Science in the European Research Area, Ljubljana, Slovania, November 2016. https://www.uni-lj.si/research_and_development/open_science/
This presentation first outlines five different aspects of impact. I then look at what we can learn from the measurement of academic impact, usually operationalised as citations. I show that four key recommendations for academic impact (multiple sources, multiple metrics, cross-disciplinary focus, and long term perspective) can be applied to non-academic impact as well. In addition, I argue that the four C's of citation impact (competence, communication, collaboration, and care) also apply to non-academic impact.
A presentation on predatory publishing, in the Information Interventions series, sponsored by the LACUNY Scholarly Communications Roundtable , the CUNY Office of Library Services, and Just Publics @ 365.
It is critical to understand the history and background of predatory publishing, a fairly recent phenomenon, whether you are an author or a librarian called upon to assess a publisher. This talk addresses the politics of Gold Open Access, the Bohannon "sting," and the issue of "third world-ism." Red herrings of predatory publishers are an especially useful aspect of this presentation.
ORCID iDs: Optimizing Research DiscoverabilityUCD Library
Presentation given by Michael Ladisch, Bibliographic Services Librarian at University College Dublin Library, Dublin Ireland at LIR Annual Seminar, March 21, 2014 in Dublin, Ireland.
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigour or credibility. This presentation will look at examples of publishers, publications and provide practical tips to identify and avoid predatory publishers.
The Royal Society of Chemistry hosts one of the worlds’ richest collections of online chemistry data that is free-to-access for the community. ChemSpider presently hosts over 30 million unique chemical compounds together with associated data and accessible via a number of search techniques. With almost 50,000 unique users per day from around the world the site offers scientists the ability to investigate the world of small molecules via property searches, analytical data and predictive models. The challenges associated with providing a similar platform for “materials” are manifold but, if they could be addressed, would offer a valuable service to the materials community. This presentation will provide an overview of how ChemSpider was built, our efforts to expand the capabilities to a more encompassing data repository and some of the challenges faced to embrace the diverse world of materials informatics and online data access.
30+ Tips how to improve your research impact : (presentation Scientific Writing course GSMS 2017)
Together with an overview of the worldwide ranking of universities, plus an insight in the “battle” for the researcher, you will get 30+ tips on how to possibly improve your research impact.
The tips will involve practical actions to be taken before ánd after publishing your research.
Scientific communication does not stop áfter publishing your research paper. Many strategies can be used to draw attention to your research, to try and improve the reach, and possibly even, the impact of it longterm. Innovations in scholarly communications, like the use of alternative (web)tools, are changing the research environment. It needs an open and more pro-active role of the researcher.
The use of research profiles, author identifiers, open access & data, social media and altmetrics, are just a few topics that will be addressed in this talk.
Predatory publishing: what it is and how to avoid itUQSCADS
There are currently approximately 28,000 journals publishing 1.5 million papers annually. Although the majority of new journals are legitimate, the credentials of some are questionable. Such journals and publishers are referred to as 'predatory'. They commonly send spam emails to potential authors, solicit submissions and request payment of article processing charges, but lack academic rigor or credibility.
This presentation provides researchers with
an insight into predatory behaviors and and how they can avoid them.
Predatory journals: Why you should not publish your manuscript in a predatory journal, and how to spot a predatory journal. Visit here: https://bit.ly/2wKX7tr
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibilityEileen Shepherd
Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics or article level metrics). Altmetrics measures impact of research, data and publications, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media. This presentation gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution. (Rhodes University is in Grahamstown, South Africa)
ResearchGate在2008年由 Dr. Ijad Madisch, Dr. Sören Hofmayer, Horst Fickenscher成立,是一個科學家與研究者的Facebook or LinkedIn。
ResearchGate讓科學家與研究者分享論文、詢答問題、找尋合作者,鼓勵分享成功或失敗的實驗與研究數據。目前ResearchGate有近四百萬的註冊使用者,比爾蓋茲也投資了美金3,500萬元。
這是一份關於ResearchGate介面的簡單說明文件。ResearchGate的操作還算簡單,但重點在於學者是否能利用這些功能創造(學術研究)上的價值
ResearchGate and Academia: Networks for Researchers to Improve Research ImpactNader Ale Ebrahim
Researchers needs to remove many traditional obstacles to reach the general public. Academic social networking allows you to connect with other researchers in your field, share your publications, and get feedback on your non-peer-reviewed work. It gives you another place to establish your name and research and perhaps even collaborate with others. The academic social networking, making your work more widely discoverable and easily available. The two best known academic social networking are ResearchGate and Academia.edu. These sites offer an instant technique to monitor what other people are looking at in your field of research. Both networks are offer roughly the same features. ResearchGate is more closely focused on collaboration and interaction, while Academia.edu often functions more as an academic version of LinkedIn, with an online CV and as a place to share your publications.
ORCID Overview: Why your Lifelong Identifier is Important in the Digital Age ...ORCID, Inc
"ORCID overview: why your lifelong identifier is important in the digital age" presented by Nobuko Miyairi, ORCID Regional Director for Asia Pacific, at the ORCID workshop on 28 February 2017.
The Top Skills That Can Get You Hired in 2017LinkedIn
We analyzed all the recruiting activity on LinkedIn this year and identified the Top Skills employers seek. Starting Oct 24, learn these skills and much more for free during the Week of Learning.
#AlwaysBeLearning https://learning.linkedin.com/week-of-learning
Seminar for LERN, Legal Education Research Network, UK, @ IALS, 28 Jan 2015, on the use of new media tools and the need for digital research literacies in legal education research.
This is a workshop delivered by the UC Berkeley Library Office of Scholarly Communication Services on October 25, 2019.
This workshop will provide you with practical strategies and tips for promoting your scholarship, increasing your citations, and monitoring your success. You’ll also learn how to understand metrics, use scholarly networking tools, evaluate journals and publishing options, and take advantage of funding opportunities for Open Access scholarship.
ScienceOpen: Rethinking Peer Review / Young Academy of ScotlandScienceOpen
Hosted by the RSE Young Academy of Scotland Open Data Working Group
The scholarly publishing paradigm is changing – Open Access, altmetrics, data-mining are increasingly setting new standards. A recent Royal Society conference on “The Future of Scholarly Scientific Communication” called in particular for sweeping reforms to the current system of peer review. The new platform ScienceOpen has taken up the challenge. In order to put the evaluation of research back in the hands of researchers, we are experimenting with new forms of author-mediated pre-publication peer review. Published articles are open for transparent post-publication peer review and versioning to reflect feedback as the scientific community reads, works with, attempts to reproduce and builds on the results. The essential efforts of peer reviewers in this process are recognized with a citable CrossRef DOI for their report. ScienceOpen goes further to extend this open research evaluation process to over 1.5 million aggregated Open Access publications. We are taking advantage of this transitional moment to rethink how scientific communication, and particularly peer review could function in the future, because we believe that scholarly publishing is not an end in itself, but the beginning of a dialogue to move the whole scientific venture forward.
Academic Social Networks and Researcher RankingAmanyalsayed
Open science and web scholarly communication
Using Web 2.0 to increase researcher’s ranking
Academic Social Networks (types, services)
Question & Answer service
Sharing your research output through ASN
Researcher measurement (h-index, RG score)
ASN and researchers’ concerns
12.5.18 "How For-Profit Companies Can Be a Part of the Open Environment" pres...DuraSpace
"How For-Profit Companies Can Be a Part of the Open Environment"
DuraSpace Members Hot Topics webinar
Presented on 12.5.18
Presented by: Andrew Smeall of Hindawi, Brian Hole of Ubiquity Press and Anita Bandrowski of SciCrunch
Lightning Talk Session 1: Establishing a Culture of Open Research
Agape – Building an Open Science Practising Community
presented by Cassandra Murphy, Agape Open Science/Maynooth University;
Open Research Practices for Research Integrity
presented by Lai Ma, University College Dublin;
Research Assessment and Incentivising Open Research Practices
presented by David O’Connell, University College Cork
Scholarly Metrics in Specialized SettingsElaine Lasda
Presentation for the Bibliometric and Research Impact Community (BRIC) of Canada on case studies of research impact in specialized settings. Focus on Michigan Publishing by co-presenter Rebecca Welzenbach
Practical applications for altmetrics in a changing metrics landscapeDigital Science
"Practical applications for altmetrics in a changing metrics landscape" - Sara Rouhi, Altmetric product specialist, and Anirvan Chatterjee, Director Data Strategy for CTSI at UCSF
OA discussion at BILETA 2017, Universidade do Minho, Portugal, focusing on legal journal publication. Co-authored with Catherine Easton and Abhilash Hair
2012.06.07 Maximising the Impact of Social Sciences ResearchNUI Galway
Jane Tinkler, Public Policy Group Manager, Impact of Social Science Project at London School of Economics presented this seminar "Maximising the Impact of Social Sciences Research" as part of the Whitaker Institute Seminar Series at the Whitaker Institute on 7th June 2012.
Using social media to disseminate academic work Jane Tinkler
Tinkler, J. (2013) 'Openness and Impact in Academia Using Social Media'. Presentation to the Critical Perspectives on ‘Open-ness’ in the Digital University conference,
Edinburgh University, November 2012.
It has become imperative to conduct funded research in today's highly resource constrained landscape of higher education. We must understand the attributes of research the mindset of researcher and the requirements of funded research.
Altmetrics Day Workshop - Internet Librarian International 2014Andy Tattersall
Altmetrics in the Academy - Implementing strategies in the library for better academic engagement, dissemination and measurement
Workshop abstract:
Altmetrics are increasingly gaining support and interest as an alternative way of disseminating and measuring scholarly output. Championed by early career researchers, librarians and information professionals, Altmetrics are to research as MOOCs are to learning. Like MOOCs most still do not understand their potential or how they could fit with or replace existing modes of delivery and assessment.
The first half of the workshop will help delegates gain an understanding of what Altmetrics are and how they can fit within academic library services. The second half of the session will deliver case studies, tools and techniques to help LIS professionals encourage better usage of Altmetrics.
10:00: What do you want from the day? What are your experiences of Altmetrics
10.40am: Altmetrics: an overview or Altmetrics and the day/where are we now?
A history, roadmap, how it fits in
11 am: Altmetrics within institutions: data, IR integration/other tools/library catalogue integration
what data is there? coverage of articles/datasets/other research outputs, mendeley demographic data
case studies of uses
examples of IR integration/motivations
primo/summon/other ones..
altmetric for institutions - integration with existing platforms
free explorer (and we’ll explore the data using this later)
11.30 Break
12.00pm Altmetrics in the Academy - getting academics and librarians on board
12.40 Brainstorming session: Value in Altmetrics: what questions do people have around this? what are their biggest concerns?
13.00 Lunch
2 pm: Getting familiar with the tools - practical session experimenting with the Altmetric explorer - half an hour (set tasks - eg create a list, pull out the most interesting mentions)
Good practice, guidelines, tips
2:45pm: At the coal face - experiences of a researcher using Altmetrics in practice
3.30pm: Break
3.45 pm: Getting mobile, how using mobile apps can help you engage more with Altmetrics
4.05 pm What’s on the horizon? What does the future for scholarly dissemination and impact.
4.40 wrap up and questions
Similar to Seven questions about ResearchGate (20)
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
Richard's entangled aventures in wonderlandRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
2. Program
7 Questions about ResearchGate
Panel:
● Liping Weng (Department of Soil Quality)
● Ana Lopez Contreras (Food & Biobased Research)
● Viet Nguyen (Operations Research and Logistics)
2
3. Thanks for your questions!
1.What can ResearchGate do with my data, what are the risks?
2.What about copyrights and open access?!
3.Who is on ResearchGate?
4.Do I get reliable answers to my questions?
5.What is the difference with other networks, like Academia.edu?
6.What is the value of the ResearchGate score
7.How does ResearchGate relate to ORCID, Linkedin etcetera and how
do we maintain those profiles?
3
4. Q1: What can ResearchGate do with my
data, what are the risks?
Terms of use
● German law applies
● ResearchGate presents itself as a service that
enables the users (you) to present information
● ResearchGate can not provide data to third parties
● You "indemnify" ResearchGate for copyright
infringements
Sounds to good to be true, how do they make their
money?
4
5. So how do they make their money?
5
“What is ResearchGate's business model to
monetize in the long run? Will the service
stay free?
Yes, the service will always stay free for
scientists. First of all, as stated in our terms,
we are not allowed to sell our users' data to
any third party which is also not a good idea,
if you want to make money in a sensible way.
The first idea is to offer featured and
targeted job postings. We already started
that: Companies or research institutions can
post their job openings for free, but if they
want to get more visibility, they have to
pay. Secondly, we give scientific
conferences the opportunity to market
their events. And finally, we want to create
a marketplace for scientific products and
services. Very similar to Amazon, but for
viruses, bacterias, cell cultures etc. So
we show researchers where they can buy
their laboratory supplies and give them the
opportunity to give feedback to vendors and
review the products. “
interview with Ijad Madisch co-founder
of ResearchGate (17/1/2014; http://dld-
conference.com/articles/connecting-the-
dots-of-science)
7. Q2: What about copyrights and open
access?!
Important: copyright rules allow making/sharing copies for personal
use.
● So.... You can always have the reference in your profile, and
answer requests
Normal copyright rules apply, before uploading check
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
● Uploading Open Access publications is a way to get them
covered in Google Scholar
7
8. Q2: What about copyrights and open
access?!
Important: copyright rules allow making/sharing copies for personal
use.
● So.... You can always have the reference in your profile, and
answer requests
Normal copyright rules apply, before uploading check
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
● Uploading Open Access publications is a way to get them
covered in Google Scholar
Other publications: depends on agreements You => Wageningen UR
● If you / your client wants publications to be in the public
domain please consider creative commons licenses
8
(more information)
9. Q3: Who is on ResearchGate?
High profile European researchers seem to be missing
Junior faculty members show high activity
Broad survey showed academia.edu slightly more
popular than ResearchGate
ResearchGate more popular in India, South Africa,
Andean countries
9
Sources:
• Thelwall, Mike, and Kayvan Kousha. "ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring
Scholarship?." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66.5 (2015): 876-889.
http://cba.scit.wlv.ac.uk/~cm1993/papers/ResearchGate.pdf
• Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate Articles: Age, Discipline, Audience Size and Impact1, 1–
20. http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/~cm1993/papers/ResearchGateArticles_preprint.pdf (see also literature
review)
12. Q4: Do I get reliable answers to my
questions?
Beyond the anecdotal, there is a piece of research that we
found:
● Positive correlation with ResearchGate Score
● Positive correlation with length of answer
● Positive correlation with references
● Positive correlation with factual information
● Negative correlation with “chatiness”
12
Li, Lei, et al. "Answer Quality Characteristics and Prediction on an Academic Q&A Site: A Case Study on
ResearchGate." Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. International
World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2015.
http://www.www2015.it/documents/proceedings/companion/p1453.pdf
13. Q5: What is the difference with other
scholarly networks?
13
Adapted from:
- Wee, Joan. “Research Network.” http://en.slideshare.net/ntunmg/research-network-30833267
- Aventurier, Pascal. "Academic social networks: Challenges and opportunities.
http://www.slideshare.net/paventurier/academic-social-networks-challenges-and-opportunities
14. Q5: What is the difference with other
scholarly networks?
14
Adapted from:
- Wee, Joan. “Research Network.” http://en.slideshare.net/ntunmg/research-network-30833267
- Aventurier, Pascal. "Academic social networks: Challenges and opportunities.
http://www.slideshare.net/paventurier/academic-social-networks-challenges-and-opportunities
15. Q6: RG-metrics: use it or not?
• full text or summary of all types read
• downloads of file on RG
→ reads breakdown for more details
16. Q6: RG-metrics: use it or not?
• based on the publication in
the RG-database
• exact coverage unclear
17. Q6: RG-metrics: use it or not?
The cumulative journal impact
factors of the publications
18. Q6: RG-metrics: use it or not?
RG-score:
• calculated by RG
• not fully disclosed
• based on contributions,
interactions and reputation
19. Q6: RG-metrics: use it or not?
1 Kraker, P., & Lex, E. (2015). A Critical Look at the ResearchGate Score as a Measure of Scientific
Reputation. In ASCW’15 Workshop at Web Science 2015 (pp. 7–9).
Serious short-comings:
The score is not transparent and irreproducible1
The score incorporates the journal impact factor to
evaluate individual researchers1
Changes in the score cannot be reconstructed1
Coverage for citations is limited and not defined
20. Q7: Can I exchange data with other
profiles?
no exchange of data with LinkedIN
send pubs from Staff Publications/GS to RG via RIS-
export (limited)
import from reference manager (limited)
alternative for complete publication overview: ORCID
21. Take home message: where to invest time?
ORCID → complete publication overview
where your audience is?
● companies, government → LinkedIN
● scientists → ResearchGate …
LinkedIN-profile or We@wur-page for visibility on
the web
ResearchGate → networking with peers
22. Questions?
This presentation is also available on:
http://www.slideshare.net/hugobesemer
http://www.slideshare.net/EllenFest
22
The case of the dormant user
Information on author
profiles and social
networks is at available
at the Library's website
Editor's Notes
er zijn relaties te leggen met andere profielen,
je kunt er niks uithalen