This document contains the schedule for a conference on science, engineering, and innovation (SEI) strategies and ethics education. It lists the times, locations, speakers, and topics for 11 sessions over 2 days. The sessions will cover micro and macroethics in graduate education, SEI strategies and resources, societal orientations in nanotechnology labs, new methods and interdisciplinary approaches to ethics education, opportunities at the intersection of ethics education and science communication, assessment of ethics education programs, ethics outside the classroom, teaching research ethics, partnerships between museums and research centers, the role of nonprofits in ethics education, and closing remarks.
Clear writing and illustrations…Clear explanations of difficult concepts…Clear communication of the ways in biochemistry is currently understood and practiced. For over 35 years, in edition after bestselling edition, Principles of Biochemistry has put those defining principles into practice, guiding students through a coherent introduction to the essentials of biochemistry without overwhelming them.
Clear writing and illustrations…Clear explanations of difficult concepts…Clear communication of the ways in biochemistry is currently understood and practiced. For over 35 years, in edition after bestselling edition, Principles of Biochemistry has put those defining principles into practice, guiding students through a coherent introduction to the essentials of biochemistry without overwhelming them.
Follow this academic DMI community bridging design science and business science .
What are the major trends in the academic discourse on Design Management ?Where are the experts ? Which labs ?
Major themes this year
#Design leadership
as creative leadership and design concept generation to drive business decisions . Designers in C suite
#Design value in business
more metrics needed ;going beyond indicators of design impact researchers looking for actual evidence of the value of design science and of specific design skills in strategy definition and implementation . going deeper on the WHY of design science in Entrepreneurship and Business transformation
#Design Thinking
Service design , User oriented design, spreading in all activities Showing evidence of design pertinence for more customer centric management and consequently business performance . Many papers facing the challenges of design for public good city transformation , design for care , circular economy
Design research labs
focusing on design led innovation through inclusive design towards aging populations and the new concept of "decolonized design " Blockchain and Virtual Reality in innovation process .Great examples of university and business collaborative research .
Thanks all for this fantastic research journey www.dmi.org for more information . #Designence .#Brigitte Borja de Mozota
Evaluation of sources: a new sustainable approach using argument analysis and...Elise Wong
Radcliff, S. & Wong, E. Evaluation of sources: a new sustainable approach using argument analysis and critical thinking. Presented at Library Instruction West 2014 conference.
An area of information literacy instruction that has increasingly gained attention is evaluation of sources. Moving away from the checklist approach (timeliness, relevancy, bias, credibility, authority), this session describes a new approach incorporating critical thinking questions and training for students on analyzing arguments using the Toulmin method, which students apply to evaluating articles and to detecting “myside” (confirmation) bias in their own writing.
This approach was used at two institutions, a 2-unit information literacy course at CSU East Bay and several sections of an English Composition course Saint Mary’s College and incorporated a “flipped classroom” design with much of the information being presented online to students prior to the in class session.
The presentation includes a literature review showing past uses of argument analysis and critical thinking in evaluation of sources, the instructional design from both institutions and results from a rubric–based evaluation of student work and student reflections.
My experience with tackling ongoing barriers faced by Women in STEM in CanadaDawn Bazely
Talk for Women Studies, Visva Bharati University, Santiniketan, West Bengal, India. March 17, 2018.
I will update this to reflect the nasty article published by Science Magazine (AAAS) containing an attack on a young woman who is a PhD student and who also does a lot of innovative science outreach and engagement.
Follow this academic DMI community bridging design science and business science .
What are the major trends in the academic discourse on Design Management ?Where are the experts ? Which labs ?
Major themes this year
#Design leadership
as creative leadership and design concept generation to drive business decisions . Designers in C suite
#Design value in business
more metrics needed ;going beyond indicators of design impact researchers looking for actual evidence of the value of design science and of specific design skills in strategy definition and implementation . going deeper on the WHY of design science in Entrepreneurship and Business transformation
#Design Thinking
Service design , User oriented design, spreading in all activities Showing evidence of design pertinence for more customer centric management and consequently business performance . Many papers facing the challenges of design for public good city transformation , design for care , circular economy
Design research labs
focusing on design led innovation through inclusive design towards aging populations and the new concept of "decolonized design " Blockchain and Virtual Reality in innovation process .Great examples of university and business collaborative research .
Thanks all for this fantastic research journey www.dmi.org for more information . #Designence .#Brigitte Borja de Mozota
Evaluation of sources: a new sustainable approach using argument analysis and...Elise Wong
Radcliff, S. & Wong, E. Evaluation of sources: a new sustainable approach using argument analysis and critical thinking. Presented at Library Instruction West 2014 conference.
An area of information literacy instruction that has increasingly gained attention is evaluation of sources. Moving away from the checklist approach (timeliness, relevancy, bias, credibility, authority), this session describes a new approach incorporating critical thinking questions and training for students on analyzing arguments using the Toulmin method, which students apply to evaluating articles and to detecting “myside” (confirmation) bias in their own writing.
This approach was used at two institutions, a 2-unit information literacy course at CSU East Bay and several sections of an English Composition course Saint Mary’s College and incorporated a “flipped classroom” design with much of the information being presented online to students prior to the in class session.
The presentation includes a literature review showing past uses of argument analysis and critical thinking in evaluation of sources, the instructional design from both institutions and results from a rubric–based evaluation of student work and student reflections.
My experience with tackling ongoing barriers faced by Women in STEM in CanadaDawn Bazely
Talk for Women Studies, Visva Bharati University, Santiniketan, West Bengal, India. March 17, 2018.
I will update this to reflect the nasty article published by Science Magazine (AAAS) containing an attack on a young woman who is a PhD student and who also does a lot of innovative science outreach and engagement.
2. Time Panel/Activity Location
8 a.m. Breakfast & Registration Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
8:30 a.m. Welcoming Remarks
Jameson Wetmore, Arizona State University
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
8:45 a.m.
Session 1
Micro and Macroethics in Graduate Education for
Scientists and Engineers
Joseph Herkert, Arizona State University
Karin Ellison, Arizona State University
Jameson Wetmore, Arizona State University
Karen Wellner, Arizona State University
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
10 a.m. Break
10:15 a.m.
Session 2
SEI Strategies and Resources
Moderated by: Jameson Wetmore, Arizona State University
Studio-Based Integration of SEI for Engineering Undergraduates
Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
The National Center for Professional and Research Ethics
Presents Ethics CORE
Michael C. Loui, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Kenneth D. Pimple, Indiana University, Bloomington
Teaching Values in the Lab: Finding and Employing Values Levers
in Design
Katie Shilton, University of Maryland, College Park
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
11:30 a.m. Break/Lunch Served Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
Noon
Session 3
Societal and Ethical Orientations at National
Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network Labs
Katherine McComas, Cornell University
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
12:45 p.m. NNIN Poster Session Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
2
Program
Thursday, November 10
3. 1:45 p.m.
Parallel
Session
4.1
New Methods for Ethics Education
Moderated by: Lori Hidinger, Arizona State University
Applying Virtual Worlds to Ethics Education
Matthew Pierlott, West Chester University of Pennsylvania
Seth Kahn, West Chester University of Pennsylvania
Joan Woolfrey, West Chester University of Pennsylvania
Minority Report and the Dual-Use Dilemma: Teaching the Ethical
Implications of Technology through Dystopian Science Fiction
Christina Matta, University of Wisconsin, Madison
iGEM Competition as a Place for Scientists to Explore Ethical
Implications
Jane Calvert, University of Edinburgh
Emma Frow, University of Edinburgh
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
1:45 p.m.
Parallel
Session
4.2
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Ethics Education
Moderated by: Keith Miller, University of Illinois, Springfield
Classroom Integration of the Science of Exploration and Life
Detection with its Social and Ethical Implications
Kenneth H. Nealson, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Margaret S. Race, SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA
Developing an Ethics Curriculum for Applied Physiology and
Biomedical Engineering Students
Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology
The Teaching of Science and Ethics: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Alan McGowan, Eugene Lang College The New School for Liberal Arts
Coconino
Room #246
3 p.m. Break
Program
3
Thursday, November 10 continued
4. 4
3:15 p.m.
Session 5
Opportunities at the Intersection of Ethics Education
and Science Communication
Moderated by: Jean Goodwin, Iowa State University
Using Debates to Help Undergraduate Students Reflect Upon the
Ethical Implications of Technology
Michael Dahlstrom, Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication
Communicating and Research Ethics
Rachelle Hollander, National Academy of Engineering
Ethical Foundations for Engaging Scientists with “the Public”: Can
Strategic Objectives and Democratic Goals Co-Exist?
Susanna Priest, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Debating Science: A New Model for Ethics Education for Science
and Engineering Students
Dane Scott, University of Montana
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
4:30 p.m. Reception & Poster Session Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
Thursday, November 10 continued
5. Time Panel/Activity Location
8 a.m. Breakfast Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
8:30 a.m.
Session 6
Assessment of Microethics & Macroethics Education
Heather Canary, University of Utah
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
9:45 a.m. Break Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
10 a.m.
Paralell
Session
7.1
Ethics Outside the Classroom
Moderated by: Sarah Pfatteicher, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Project-Based Courses on Social Entrepreneurship for Developing
Countries: A Novel Means for Engineers to Learn about the Social
and Ethical Implications of their Work?
Matthew Harsh, Arizona State University
Nalini Chhetri, Arizona State University
Studying International Ethics through Engineers without
Borders
Laura Grossenbacher, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Responsible Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology:
Contextualizing Socio-Technical Integration into the
Nanofabrication Laboratories in the USA
Debasmita Patra, Independent Scholar
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
10 a.m.
Paralell
Session
7.2
Teaching Strategies for Research Ethics
Moderated by: Kenneth D. Pimple, Indiana University, Bloomington
Teaching Research Ethics and Ethical Decision-Making
Wayne Fuqua, Western Michigan University
David Hartmann, Western Michigan University
Thomas Van Valey, Western Michigan University
Tailoring Pedagogy to Problems: ‘Fractious Problems’ and a
‘Navigational Approach’
Roberta M. Berry, Georgia Institute of Technology
Beyond Case Studies
Michael Kalichman, University of California, San Diego
Dena Plemmons, University of California, San Diego
Cochise
Room #228
5
Friday, November 11
Program
6. Friday, November 11 continued
11:15 a.m. Break/Lunch Served
11:45 a.m.
Lunch
Talk
Working with Ethicists: A Bestiary
Kenneth D. Pimple, Indiana University, Bloomington
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
12:45 p.m.
Session 8
Partnerships Between Museums and Research Centers
Moderated by: Rae Ostman, Sciencenter, Ithaca, NY
Larry Bell, Museum of Science, Boston, MA
Brad Herring, Museum of Life and Science, Durham, NC
Leigha Horton, Science Museum of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
Frank Kusiak, Lawrence Hall of Science, Berkeley, CA
Stephanie Long, Science Museum of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
Paul Martin, Science Museum of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
David Sittenfeld, Museum of Science, Boston, MA
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
2 p.m.
Session 9
The Role of the Nonprofit Sector in SEI Education
Moderated by: Sharlissa Moore, Arizona State University
Panelists:
Jaime Yassif, University of California, Berkeley
Melanie Roberts, Forum on Science, Ethics, and Policy
Chris Sequeria, Graduation Pledge Alliance
Kyle Gracey, Student Pugwash
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
3:15 p.m. Break
3:30 p.m.
Session
10
Closing Reflections from Young Scholars
Moderated by: Jameson Wetmore
Kiera Reifschneider, Arizona State University
Jessica Corman, Arizona State University
Tracy Niday, Arizona State University
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
4 p.m.
Session
11
Closing Remarks
Moderated by: Joseph Herkert
Rachelle Hollander, National Academy of Engineering
Deborah Johnson, University of Virginia
Nick Steneck, University of Michigan
Ventana Ballroom
Room #241
5 p.m. Adjourn
6
