Secular Stagnation
Why Might Equilibrium Real Rates Have Fallen?
Increased Savings
Changes in distribution of income and profits share
Reserve accumulation or capital flight
Increasing deleveraging and retirement preparation
Decreases in Investment Propensity
Declining growth rate of population and/or technology
Demassification of the economy
Fall in price of capital goods
Other factors
Increased global save asset demand
3/14/2020 The Age of Secular Stagnation | Larry Summers
larrysummers.com/2016/02/17/the-age-of-secular-stagnation/ 1/6
HOME CONTACT SEARCH
Lawrence H.
Summers is the
Charles W. Eliot
University Professor
and President
Emeritus at Harvard University. He
served as the 71st Secretary of the
Treasury for President Clinton and
the Director of the National Economic
Council for President Obama.
FULL BIO
Larry Summers on
SECULAR STAGNATION READ MORE
FOLLOW @LHSUMMERS
on Twitter
Larry Summers
COMMENTARY RESEARCH TEACHING MEDIA RESOURCES
Summers published an article title, “The Age of Secular
Stagnation: What It Is and What to Do About It,” in the February
issue of Foreign A�airs. The article explores how expansionary
�scal policy by the U.S. government can help overcome secular
stagnation problems and get growth back on track.
The Age of Secular Stagnation: What It Is and What to Do About It
February 15, 2016
published in Foreign A�airs
As surprising as the recent �nancial crisis [1] and recession were, the behavior of the
world’s industrialized economies and �nancial markets during the recovery [2] has been
even more so.
Most observers expected the unusually deep recession to be followed by an unusually
rapid recovery, with output and employment returning to trend levels relatively quickly.
Yet even with the U.S. Federal Reserve [3]’s aggressive monetary policies, the recovery
(both in the United States and around the globe) has fallen signi�cantly short of
predictions and has been far weaker than its predecessors [4]. Had the American
economy performed as the Congressional Budget O�ce fore cast in August 2009—after
the stimulus had been passed and the recovery had started—U.S. GDP today would be
about $1.3 trillion higher than it is.
Almost no one in 2009 imagined that U.S. interest rates would stay near zero for six
years, that key interest rates in Europe would turn negative, and that central banks in the
G-7 would collectively expand their balance sheets by more than $5 trillion. Had
economists been told such monetary policies lay ahead, moreover, they would have
con�dently predicted that in�ation would become a serious problem—and would have
been shocked to �nd out that across the United States, Europe, and Japan, it has
generally remained well below two percent.
In the wake of the crisis, governments’ debt-to-GDP ratios have risen sharply, from 41
percent in 2008 to 74 percent today in the United States, from 47 percent to 70 percent
in Europe, and from 95 percent to 126 percent in Japan.
The document discusses how the US economic growth of the last decade was fueled by consumer spending and easy credit access, but these conditions have now changed in ways that make a return to "normal" unlikely. It argues that earnings growth, asset prices, and GDP in the future cannot rely on the same factors as the past 20 years, namely generous consumer credit, home equity withdrawals, and widespread lending. Going forward, consumer deleveraging, tighter credit conditions, and reduced demand will hamper earnings and the economy unless new drivers of growth can be found to replace the credit-fueled spending that drove past prosperity.
The document discusses how the US economic growth of the last decade was fueled by consumer spending and easy credit access, but these conditions have now changed in ways that make a return to "normal" unlikely. It argues that earnings and GDP growth depended on factors like monetary policy, asset inflation, and consumer leverage that are no longer applicable. It questions where future earnings, buying power, and credit will come from to support previous levels of economic activity and asset prices.
Swedbank was founded in 1820, as Sweden’s first savings bank was established. Today, our heritage is visible in that we truly are a bank for each and every one and in that we still strive to contribute to a sustainable development of society and our environment. We are strongly committed to society as a whole and keen to help bring about a sustainable form of societal development. Our Swedish operations hold an ISO 14001 environmental certification, and environmental work is an integral part of our business activities.
General Stanley McChrystal was fired by President Obama after unflattering comments he made about administration officials were published in Rolling Stone magazine. The article was able to be published because the freelance journalist who wrote it, Michael Hastings, was not constrained by concerns about burning bridges, unlike beat reporters who rely on ongoing access. This highlights how outsiders can sometimes uncover important stories that insiders miss due to fears of jeopardizing relationships and access.
Instructions1. On the top of the page, provide the article citat.docxnormanibarber20063
Instructions
1. On the top of the page, provide the article citation in current APA format.
On the next line down, type the topic of your articles: (Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
in all caps and bold format.
2. In a double-spaced document, briefly explain the author’s purpose for writing the article. One way to understand the author’s purpose is to ask yourself why he or she wrote it. (For example, consider current and future events, politics, or anything else that may have inspired the article.)
3. Summarize the article(The criminality of Wall Street), focusing on the discussion of the topic the article addresses. Incorporate relevant economic theory that is present so that discussion of the article content is clear.
Article: The Criminality of Wall Street
Tabb, William K. Monthly Review66.4 (Sep 2014): 13-22.
The current stage of capitalism is characterized by the increased power of finance capital. How to understand the economics of this shift and its political implications is now central for both the left and the larger society. There can be little doubt that a signature development of our time is the growth of finance and monopoly power.1
In 1980 the nominal value of global financial assets almost equaled global GDP. In 2005 they were more than three times global GDP.2 The nominal value of foreign exchange trading increased from eleven times the value of global trade in 1980 to seventy-three times in 2009.3 Of course it is not certain what this increase means, since such nominal values can fluctuate widely, as we saw in the Great Financial Crisis. They cannot be compared directly and without all sorts of qualifications to the value added in the real economy. But they do give an impressionistic sense of the enormous magnitude by which finance grew and came to dominate the economy. Between 1980 and 2007, derivative contracts of all kinds expanded from $1 trillion globally to $600 trillion.4 Hedge funds and private equity groups, special investment vehicles, and mega-bank holding companies changed the face of Western capitalism. They also brought on the collapse from which we still suffer. Ordinary people may not be acquainted with the numbers (and even those best informed are not sure of their significance), but people generally understand in different and often deep ways what has been happening: namely, an ongoing process of financialization that has come to dwarf production.
What is particularly important is that despite the huge bubble created by this metastasizing growth of finance, the economy did not expand as rapidly as it had in the postwar years, before the goods producing industries lost ground in terms of employment to other sectors of the economy, and when government spending was used actively to promote growth. While the nature of much of the growth that occurred then is certainly open to criticism from all sorts of standpoints, at the time there was widespread understanding in policy circles that government spending was.
Us economy goldilocks- 4th oct 2007 published in singapore timessatya saurabh khosla
The author's article that appeared in Business Times, Singapore on Oct 4, 2007 stated that USA Housing, low interest rates and derivatives will lead the global economy into a recession
Economics Honors Paper - Tu Nguyen - 2015Tu Nguyen
This document is a thesis presented by Tu Nguyen to the Department of Economics at Randolph College in partial fulfillment of a Bachelor of Arts degree with Honors. The thesis attempts to explain the causes of the recent housing bubble in the United States using both economic and psychological theories. Through a literature review and empirical analysis using a housing bubble index and regression models, the study finds that government housing subsidies and media coverage were significant determinants of the housing bubble.
The document discusses how the US economic growth of the last decade was fueled by consumer spending and easy credit access, but these conditions have now changed in ways that make a return to "normal" unlikely. It argues that earnings growth, asset prices, and GDP in the future cannot rely on the same factors as the past 20 years, namely generous consumer credit, home equity withdrawals, and widespread lending. Going forward, consumer deleveraging, tighter credit conditions, and reduced demand will hamper earnings and the economy unless new drivers of growth can be found to replace the credit-fueled spending that drove past prosperity.
The document discusses how the US economic growth of the last decade was fueled by consumer spending and easy credit access, but these conditions have now changed in ways that make a return to "normal" unlikely. It argues that earnings and GDP growth depended on factors like monetary policy, asset inflation, and consumer leverage that are no longer applicable. It questions where future earnings, buying power, and credit will come from to support previous levels of economic activity and asset prices.
Swedbank was founded in 1820, as Sweden’s first savings bank was established. Today, our heritage is visible in that we truly are a bank for each and every one and in that we still strive to contribute to a sustainable development of society and our environment. We are strongly committed to society as a whole and keen to help bring about a sustainable form of societal development. Our Swedish operations hold an ISO 14001 environmental certification, and environmental work is an integral part of our business activities.
General Stanley McChrystal was fired by President Obama after unflattering comments he made about administration officials were published in Rolling Stone magazine. The article was able to be published because the freelance journalist who wrote it, Michael Hastings, was not constrained by concerns about burning bridges, unlike beat reporters who rely on ongoing access. This highlights how outsiders can sometimes uncover important stories that insiders miss due to fears of jeopardizing relationships and access.
Instructions1. On the top of the page, provide the article citat.docxnormanibarber20063
Instructions
1. On the top of the page, provide the article citation in current APA format.
On the next line down, type the topic of your articles: (Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
in all caps and bold format.
2. In a double-spaced document, briefly explain the author’s purpose for writing the article. One way to understand the author’s purpose is to ask yourself why he or she wrote it. (For example, consider current and future events, politics, or anything else that may have inspired the article.)
3. Summarize the article(The criminality of Wall Street), focusing on the discussion of the topic the article addresses. Incorporate relevant economic theory that is present so that discussion of the article content is clear.
Article: The Criminality of Wall Street
Tabb, William K. Monthly Review66.4 (Sep 2014): 13-22.
The current stage of capitalism is characterized by the increased power of finance capital. How to understand the economics of this shift and its political implications is now central for both the left and the larger society. There can be little doubt that a signature development of our time is the growth of finance and monopoly power.1
In 1980 the nominal value of global financial assets almost equaled global GDP. In 2005 they were more than three times global GDP.2 The nominal value of foreign exchange trading increased from eleven times the value of global trade in 1980 to seventy-three times in 2009.3 Of course it is not certain what this increase means, since such nominal values can fluctuate widely, as we saw in the Great Financial Crisis. They cannot be compared directly and without all sorts of qualifications to the value added in the real economy. But they do give an impressionistic sense of the enormous magnitude by which finance grew and came to dominate the economy. Between 1980 and 2007, derivative contracts of all kinds expanded from $1 trillion globally to $600 trillion.4 Hedge funds and private equity groups, special investment vehicles, and mega-bank holding companies changed the face of Western capitalism. They also brought on the collapse from which we still suffer. Ordinary people may not be acquainted with the numbers (and even those best informed are not sure of their significance), but people generally understand in different and often deep ways what has been happening: namely, an ongoing process of financialization that has come to dwarf production.
What is particularly important is that despite the huge bubble created by this metastasizing growth of finance, the economy did not expand as rapidly as it had in the postwar years, before the goods producing industries lost ground in terms of employment to other sectors of the economy, and when government spending was used actively to promote growth. While the nature of much of the growth that occurred then is certainly open to criticism from all sorts of standpoints, at the time there was widespread understanding in policy circles that government spending was.
Us economy goldilocks- 4th oct 2007 published in singapore timessatya saurabh khosla
The author's article that appeared in Business Times, Singapore on Oct 4, 2007 stated that USA Housing, low interest rates and derivatives will lead the global economy into a recession
Economics Honors Paper - Tu Nguyen - 2015Tu Nguyen
This document is a thesis presented by Tu Nguyen to the Department of Economics at Randolph College in partial fulfillment of a Bachelor of Arts degree with Honors. The thesis attempts to explain the causes of the recent housing bubble in the United States using both economic and psychological theories. Through a literature review and empirical analysis using a housing bubble index and regression models, the study finds that government housing subsidies and media coverage were significant determinants of the housing bubble.
Liquidity Risk Reporting, Measurement and Managementaseemelahi
The document discusses liquidity risk measurement and management through scenario analysis and cash flow projections. It outlines two likely economic scenarios - stagflation and deflation - and recommends analyzing liquidity needs across multiple scenarios and stress levels through a "buying time" framework. It also discusses measuring liquidity risk through cash flow projections and reporting, highlighting the importance of modeling behavioral assumptions around different sources and uses of liquidity.
Question 1Response 1Development inside and out effects t.docxaudeleypearl
Question 1:
Response 1:
Development inside and out effects the entire country's economy. It impacts the managing body, regardless the clearly irrelevant subtleties in the average person's dependably life. Both a conditions and clear deferred results of how the economy is getting along, swelling has the two its fans and spoilers. Distinctive envisions that particular degrees of swelling are helpful for a prospering economy, yet that progressively critical rates raise concerns. It can degrade the money basically and, at logically lamentable, has been a key part to subsidences.
Swelling, as referenced, is the rate a worth ascensions, and fundamentally how much the dollar is worth at a given moment concerning checking. The idea behind swelling being an impact for good in the economy is that a reasonable enough rate can nudge financial movement without debasing the money so much that it ends up being basically vain (Kohn, 2006).
Swelling can in like manner falter from asset for asset. Subordinate upon the season, the expense of gas could go up independently from with everything considered headway as it routinely does as summer moves close. In reality, there is even a term - focus improvement - for swelling that parts in everything except for sustenance and imperativeness (gas and oil), as these regions have separate factors that add to them. There are a wide degree of sorts of swelling, subordinate upon what remarkable is being viewed comparatively as what the development rate truly is by all accounts. For example, what happens if the swelling rate is well over the Fed's normal goal? At a higher rate, yet still in the single digits, that is known as walking swelling. It is seen as concerning yet sensible (Ball, 2006).
Swelling is generally depicted reliant on its rate and causes. By and large, Inflation happens in an economy when vitality for thing and experiences outmaneuvers the supply of yield. in this manner, clarifications behind Inflation have different sides, the intrigue side and supply side. The widely inclusive activity of hazard premiums in driving enlargement pay over the scope of advancing years is dependable with secured budgetary improvement and inside and out oblige cash related procedure events in the moved economies. The degree for further fitting budgetary enabling seen with money related stars seems to have declined amidst the enough low advance charges and gigantic monetary records of national banks (Bodie, 2016).
In relentless time, the correspondence of perils has wound up being constantly phenomenal, the general point of view has lit up, and money related conditions have engaged on net. With the work superstar proceeding to reinforce, and GDP improvement expected to keep up a vital good ways from back in the consequent quarter, it likely will be fitting soon to change the affiliation supports rate. Likewise, if the economy propels as shown by the SEP concentrate way, the affiliation supports rate will probably app ...
Blackwall partners 2 qtr 2016- transient volatility part iiiMichael Durante
This document discusses the state of the US economy under President Obama and the policies of the Obama administration. It argues that the economy has stagnated, with 95 million Americans not working, wages stagnant, and declining upward mobility. It attributes this to failed "socialistic" policies and excessive government intervention. The author argues the economy needs inspiration to return to growth and policies that worked previously to boost jobs, wages, home and family formation.
Global Macro-economics, Trends, Portfolio ImplicationsNikunj Sanghvi
My presentation to the Bombay Chartered Accountants' Society International Economic Study Circle on Global macro-economics, trends, portfolio implications
Aug 7th 2013
Mumbai, India
Covid19 Pandemic: Looming Global Recession and Impact on BangladeshMd. Tanzirul Amin
The document summarizes the economic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, including a potential global recession. It discusses indicators that a recession may occur, such as stock market declines and yield curve inversions. The pandemic has reduced global production and exports while increasing unemployment. For Bangladesh specifically, exports and remittances declined sharply, threatening employment and government revenue. The economic challenges for Bangladesh recovering are substantial in the face of an uncertain global economic outlook.
Can the United States Continue to Run Current Account Deficits Ind.docxhumphrieskalyn
Can the United States Continue to Run Current Account Deficits Indefinitely?
The United States has benefitted from a surplus of saving over investment in many areas of the world, which has provided a supply of funds. This surplus of saving has been available to the United States because foreigners have remained willing to loan that saving to the United States in the form of acquiring U.S. assets, such as Treasury securities, which have accommodated the current account deficits. During the 1990s and the first decade of the 2000s, for example, the United States experi- enced a decline in its rate of saving and an increase in the rate of domestic invest- ment. The large increase in the U.S. current account deficit would not have been possible without the accommodating inflows of foreign capital coming from nations with high saving rates, such as Japan, China, and Middle-Eastern nations, as seen in Table 10.5.
For example, China has been the fastest growing supplier of capital to the United States during 2001–2010. This is partly because of China’s exchange-rate pol- icy of keeping the value of its yuan low (cheap) so as to export goods to the United States and thus create jobs for its workers (see Chapter 15). In order to offset a rise in the value of the yuan against the dollar, the central bank of China has purchased dollars with yuan. Rather than hold dollars, which earn no interest, China’s central bank has converted much of its dollar holdings into U.S. securities that do pay inter- est. This situation has put the United States in a unique position to benefit from the willingness of China to finance its current-account deficit. Simply put, the
TABLE 10.5
FOREIGN HOLDERS OF U.S. SECURITIES AS OF 2007
United States can “print money” that the Chinese hold in order to finance its excess spending. The buildup of China’s dollar reserves helps to support the U.S. stock and bond markets and permits the U.S. government to incur expenditure increases and tax reductions without increases in domestic U.S. interest rates that would otherwise take place. However, some analysts are con- cerned that at some point Chinese investors may view the increasing level of U.S. foreign debt as unsustain- able or more risky and thus suddenly shift their capital elsewhere. They also express concern that the United States will become more politically reliant on China who might use its large holdings of U.S. securities as leverage against policies it opposes.
Can the United States run current account deficits indefinitely and thus rely on inflows of foreign capital? Since the current account deficit arises mainly because foreigners desire to purchase American assets, there is
Chapter 10 361
Billions of Country Dollars
Japan $1,197
Percent of World Total
12.2% 9.4 9.4 7.6 7.2 4.9 4.0
45.3
100.0%
China United Kingdom Cayman Islands Luxembourg Canada Belgium Other 4,418
World Total $9,772
922
921
740
703
475
396
Source: U.S. Treasury Department, Report on Foreign ...
As expected, the Federal Open Market Committee has embarked on another round of planned asset purchases. In its November 3 policy statement, the FOMC wrote that it expects to buy another $600 billion in long-term Treasuries by the end of 2Q11 ($75 billion per month), in addition to the $35 billion per month in reinvested principal payments from its portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. There has been much criticism of the move in the financial press. Certainly, there are risks in the Fed’s strategy. However, it’s hardly reckless or ill-advised.
World crisis of 2008 and its economic, social and geopolitical consequencesFernando Alcoforado
The global economic and financial crisis of 2008 had wide-ranging economic, social, and geopolitical consequences according to experts. The crisis originated from risky lending practices and over-complex financial innovations in the US that spread worldwide. It resulted in massive losses, a collapse in credit markets, and a severe global recession. Experts argue this could lead to prolonged fiscal deficits, protectionism, and a shift away from US dominance on the global stage. The crisis also hit developing economies hard through falling trade and commodity prices, with serious social impacts. It marked the end of the era of financial liberalization and globalization as governments intervened extensively to stabilize markets.
This document provides a summary of the economic crisis that began in 2007. It discusses how the increasing integration of global markets led to growth but also vulnerability. The crisis that started in 2007 was more than a recession, as the housing market collapse in the US continued through 2009, exacerbating problems of high household debt levels. Government and central bank efforts to inject liquidity and spend on stimulus programs struggled to stop the economic downward spiral. Major banks remained fundamentally insolvent despite government capital injections, and credit creation broke down. By the end of 2008, the US government had committed over $7 trillion to bailouts, and deficits were rapidly rising.
Howard Marks provides a balanced discussion of the current market environment, covering both positives and negatives. On the positive side, the U.S. economy is growing and corporate profits are increasing. However, asset valuations are very high by historical standards and investor behavior has become increasingly risky. Given the high prices and uncertainties, Marks favors a cautious stance rather than aggressiveness. While not recommending getting out of the market, he advocates incorporating more defensiveness into portfolio management strategies.
The document summarizes the outlook for markets in 2009. It believes the recession will persist through 2009 with a weak recovery. Government stimulus plans aim to boost spending but the effects may be delayed. The Federal Reserve has increased money supply but must remove excess cash to avoid inflation. Consumers are saving more due to debt and falling asset values, which may slow growth but support bond prices. Global trade and capital flows are also slowing. The outlook calls for a challenging year with opportunities in quality companies and bonds offering higher yields. Flexibility will be needed to respond to changing opportunities and risks.
The document analyzes the cognitive and behavioral factors behind the 2008 financial crisis. It discusses how herd behavior, the availability heuristic, and groupthink led to ill-advised decisions that propagated the crisis. Herd behavior explained the housing bubble as investors followed each other into the overheated market. It also contributed to the boom and bust of the mortgage-backed securities market. The availability heuristic and groupthink affected decision making at financial institutions and government agencies. Letting Lehman Brothers fail unexpectedly triggered a global recession due to a loss of confidence propagating through herd behavior.
The document provides a recap and analysis of macroeconomic factors and their impact on the economy and financial markets from 2007 to 2009. It summarizes warnings in 2007 about the credit crisis, including rising lending standards, dependence on credit growth, and the bursting of the credit bubble. It describes shocks to the financial system in August 2007 and the Federal Reserve's response. While the stock market rallied on rate cuts, the document warns that the full economic impact was still unknown and that home prices and the economy remained at risk.
Write a page to a page and half for each topic and read each topic a.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page to a page and half for each topic and read each topic and there attachment carefully and summarize
1-Mon Oct 28: The Conflict over Religious Authority in Post-Safavid Iran
Attached Files:
Attachment : Momen Akhbari School (1).pdf
Moojan Momen,
An Introduction to Shi’i Islam,
ch.6, 12.
2- Wed Oct 30: Imperial Reform Movements
Attached Files:
Tanzimat Decree (1).pdf
Tobacco Concession (2)pdf
25 Reform Movements (3) pptx
Cleveland,
Modern Middle East,
ch.5-6
Primary Sources:
Gulhane Edict (1839)
Hatt-i Humayun (1856)
Tobacco Concession
3- Fri Nov 1: Social and Intellectual Movements in the Early 20th Century
Attached Files:
alAfghani (1)
Abduh Theology of Unity (2)
.
Write a page discussing why you believe PMI is focusing BA as the fi.docxedgar6wallace88877
PMI focuses business analysis as the first step in the project management model because understanding requirements upfront helps define the scope and prevent issues down the road. Poor business analysis can negatively impact a project's success if the wrong objectives are identified or user needs aren't understood correctly. Validating ideas with citations is important to support opinions on why analysis is important for setting projects up for success.
Write a page of personal reflection of your present leadership compe.docxedgar6wallace88877
This document asks the reader to write a journal entry reflecting on their present leadership competencies, possible adjustments to their leadership approach, and how it relates to concepts of communication, leadership, and power and politics. The reflection should demonstrate a high level of understanding by adequately integrating authoritative sources with in-text citations in APA format.
Write a page of compare and contrast for the Big Five Personalit.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page of compare and contrast for the Big Five Personality Model against the MBTI. Attached some info below.
Based on what you have learned thus far, how might the MBTI lack for strong supporting evidence as opposed to the Big Five Model? Thoroughly explain.
After doing so discuss how the Big Five Traits could predict behavior at your place of employment. What could be some advantage of doing so?
What might be some disadvantages? Thoroughly explain.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with intext citations and references in APA format.
.
Write a page of research and discuss an innovation that includes mul.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page of research and discuss an innovation that includes multiple innovation types (per Keely). Discuss the types of innovation involved and comment on how you feel this combination could potentially create a sustainable competitive advantage for the business. Be sure to include references in APA format with intext citations.
.
Write a page answering the questions below.Sometimes projects .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page answering the questions below.
Sometimes projects fail. Such failure can be contributed to unreasonable time constraints, poorly estimated financial estimates, poorly systematized planning process or organizational goals not understood at lower organizational levels.
As a project manager, what key factors are absolutely vital to prevent such failure?
Discuss the role of the leader and manager in a project environment or project initiative.
Be sure to identify how the duties of project managers reinforce the role of leadership. Use real-life examples.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
.
Write a one-paragraph summary of one of the reading assignments from.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-paragraph summary of one of the reading assignments from the textbook.
Reading assignments to choose from are
from Beowulf - trans. Burton Raffel
Children - Slawomir Mrozek
The Jar - Luigi Pirandello
Death of a Tsotsi - Alan Paton
Judges Must Balance Justice vs. Young Lives - Patricia Edmonds
Youth Violent Crime Keeps Climbing - J.L. Albert
Action Will Be Taken: An Action-Packed Story - Heinrich Boll
from The Life of Henry the Fifth - William Shakespeare
Speech, May 13, 1940 - Winston Churchill
The Thrill of the Grass - W.P. Kinsella
from Night - Elie Wiesel
This Too Is Everything - Shu Ting
A Marriage Proposal - Anton Chekhov
There's plenty more reading assignments in the book. If you can help me but need more choices let me know. Thanks
.
Write a one-paragraph summary of this article.Riordan, B. C..docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-paragraph summary of this article.
Riordan, B. C., Flett, J. A. M., Hunter, J. A., Scarf, D., & Conner, T. S. (2015). Fear of missing out (FoMO): the relationship between FoMO, alcohol use, and alcohol-related consequences in college students.
Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Functions
,
2
(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.7243/2055-3447-2-9
.
More Related Content
Similar to Secular StagnationWhy Might Equilibriu.docx
Liquidity Risk Reporting, Measurement and Managementaseemelahi
The document discusses liquidity risk measurement and management through scenario analysis and cash flow projections. It outlines two likely economic scenarios - stagflation and deflation - and recommends analyzing liquidity needs across multiple scenarios and stress levels through a "buying time" framework. It also discusses measuring liquidity risk through cash flow projections and reporting, highlighting the importance of modeling behavioral assumptions around different sources and uses of liquidity.
Question 1Response 1Development inside and out effects t.docxaudeleypearl
Question 1:
Response 1:
Development inside and out effects the entire country's economy. It impacts the managing body, regardless the clearly irrelevant subtleties in the average person's dependably life. Both a conditions and clear deferred results of how the economy is getting along, swelling has the two its fans and spoilers. Distinctive envisions that particular degrees of swelling are helpful for a prospering economy, yet that progressively critical rates raise concerns. It can degrade the money basically and, at logically lamentable, has been a key part to subsidences.
Swelling, as referenced, is the rate a worth ascensions, and fundamentally how much the dollar is worth at a given moment concerning checking. The idea behind swelling being an impact for good in the economy is that a reasonable enough rate can nudge financial movement without debasing the money so much that it ends up being basically vain (Kohn, 2006).
Swelling can in like manner falter from asset for asset. Subordinate upon the season, the expense of gas could go up independently from with everything considered headway as it routinely does as summer moves close. In reality, there is even a term - focus improvement - for swelling that parts in everything except for sustenance and imperativeness (gas and oil), as these regions have separate factors that add to them. There are a wide degree of sorts of swelling, subordinate upon what remarkable is being viewed comparatively as what the development rate truly is by all accounts. For example, what happens if the swelling rate is well over the Fed's normal goal? At a higher rate, yet still in the single digits, that is known as walking swelling. It is seen as concerning yet sensible (Ball, 2006).
Swelling is generally depicted reliant on its rate and causes. By and large, Inflation happens in an economy when vitality for thing and experiences outmaneuvers the supply of yield. in this manner, clarifications behind Inflation have different sides, the intrigue side and supply side. The widely inclusive activity of hazard premiums in driving enlargement pay over the scope of advancing years is dependable with secured budgetary improvement and inside and out oblige cash related procedure events in the moved economies. The degree for further fitting budgetary enabling seen with money related stars seems to have declined amidst the enough low advance charges and gigantic monetary records of national banks (Bodie, 2016).
In relentless time, the correspondence of perils has wound up being constantly phenomenal, the general point of view has lit up, and money related conditions have engaged on net. With the work superstar proceeding to reinforce, and GDP improvement expected to keep up a vital good ways from back in the consequent quarter, it likely will be fitting soon to change the affiliation supports rate. Likewise, if the economy propels as shown by the SEP concentrate way, the affiliation supports rate will probably app ...
Blackwall partners 2 qtr 2016- transient volatility part iiiMichael Durante
This document discusses the state of the US economy under President Obama and the policies of the Obama administration. It argues that the economy has stagnated, with 95 million Americans not working, wages stagnant, and declining upward mobility. It attributes this to failed "socialistic" policies and excessive government intervention. The author argues the economy needs inspiration to return to growth and policies that worked previously to boost jobs, wages, home and family formation.
Global Macro-economics, Trends, Portfolio ImplicationsNikunj Sanghvi
My presentation to the Bombay Chartered Accountants' Society International Economic Study Circle on Global macro-economics, trends, portfolio implications
Aug 7th 2013
Mumbai, India
Covid19 Pandemic: Looming Global Recession and Impact on BangladeshMd. Tanzirul Amin
The document summarizes the economic impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, including a potential global recession. It discusses indicators that a recession may occur, such as stock market declines and yield curve inversions. The pandemic has reduced global production and exports while increasing unemployment. For Bangladesh specifically, exports and remittances declined sharply, threatening employment and government revenue. The economic challenges for Bangladesh recovering are substantial in the face of an uncertain global economic outlook.
Can the United States Continue to Run Current Account Deficits Ind.docxhumphrieskalyn
Can the United States Continue to Run Current Account Deficits Indefinitely?
The United States has benefitted from a surplus of saving over investment in many areas of the world, which has provided a supply of funds. This surplus of saving has been available to the United States because foreigners have remained willing to loan that saving to the United States in the form of acquiring U.S. assets, such as Treasury securities, which have accommodated the current account deficits. During the 1990s and the first decade of the 2000s, for example, the United States experi- enced a decline in its rate of saving and an increase in the rate of domestic invest- ment. The large increase in the U.S. current account deficit would not have been possible without the accommodating inflows of foreign capital coming from nations with high saving rates, such as Japan, China, and Middle-Eastern nations, as seen in Table 10.5.
For example, China has been the fastest growing supplier of capital to the United States during 2001–2010. This is partly because of China’s exchange-rate pol- icy of keeping the value of its yuan low (cheap) so as to export goods to the United States and thus create jobs for its workers (see Chapter 15). In order to offset a rise in the value of the yuan against the dollar, the central bank of China has purchased dollars with yuan. Rather than hold dollars, which earn no interest, China’s central bank has converted much of its dollar holdings into U.S. securities that do pay inter- est. This situation has put the United States in a unique position to benefit from the willingness of China to finance its current-account deficit. Simply put, the
TABLE 10.5
FOREIGN HOLDERS OF U.S. SECURITIES AS OF 2007
United States can “print money” that the Chinese hold in order to finance its excess spending. The buildup of China’s dollar reserves helps to support the U.S. stock and bond markets and permits the U.S. government to incur expenditure increases and tax reductions without increases in domestic U.S. interest rates that would otherwise take place. However, some analysts are con- cerned that at some point Chinese investors may view the increasing level of U.S. foreign debt as unsustain- able or more risky and thus suddenly shift their capital elsewhere. They also express concern that the United States will become more politically reliant on China who might use its large holdings of U.S. securities as leverage against policies it opposes.
Can the United States run current account deficits indefinitely and thus rely on inflows of foreign capital? Since the current account deficit arises mainly because foreigners desire to purchase American assets, there is
Chapter 10 361
Billions of Country Dollars
Japan $1,197
Percent of World Total
12.2% 9.4 9.4 7.6 7.2 4.9 4.0
45.3
100.0%
China United Kingdom Cayman Islands Luxembourg Canada Belgium Other 4,418
World Total $9,772
922
921
740
703
475
396
Source: U.S. Treasury Department, Report on Foreign ...
As expected, the Federal Open Market Committee has embarked on another round of planned asset purchases. In its November 3 policy statement, the FOMC wrote that it expects to buy another $600 billion in long-term Treasuries by the end of 2Q11 ($75 billion per month), in addition to the $35 billion per month in reinvested principal payments from its portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. There has been much criticism of the move in the financial press. Certainly, there are risks in the Fed’s strategy. However, it’s hardly reckless or ill-advised.
World crisis of 2008 and its economic, social and geopolitical consequencesFernando Alcoforado
The global economic and financial crisis of 2008 had wide-ranging economic, social, and geopolitical consequences according to experts. The crisis originated from risky lending practices and over-complex financial innovations in the US that spread worldwide. It resulted in massive losses, a collapse in credit markets, and a severe global recession. Experts argue this could lead to prolonged fiscal deficits, protectionism, and a shift away from US dominance on the global stage. The crisis also hit developing economies hard through falling trade and commodity prices, with serious social impacts. It marked the end of the era of financial liberalization and globalization as governments intervened extensively to stabilize markets.
This document provides a summary of the economic crisis that began in 2007. It discusses how the increasing integration of global markets led to growth but also vulnerability. The crisis that started in 2007 was more than a recession, as the housing market collapse in the US continued through 2009, exacerbating problems of high household debt levels. Government and central bank efforts to inject liquidity and spend on stimulus programs struggled to stop the economic downward spiral. Major banks remained fundamentally insolvent despite government capital injections, and credit creation broke down. By the end of 2008, the US government had committed over $7 trillion to bailouts, and deficits were rapidly rising.
Howard Marks provides a balanced discussion of the current market environment, covering both positives and negatives. On the positive side, the U.S. economy is growing and corporate profits are increasing. However, asset valuations are very high by historical standards and investor behavior has become increasingly risky. Given the high prices and uncertainties, Marks favors a cautious stance rather than aggressiveness. While not recommending getting out of the market, he advocates incorporating more defensiveness into portfolio management strategies.
The document summarizes the outlook for markets in 2009. It believes the recession will persist through 2009 with a weak recovery. Government stimulus plans aim to boost spending but the effects may be delayed. The Federal Reserve has increased money supply but must remove excess cash to avoid inflation. Consumers are saving more due to debt and falling asset values, which may slow growth but support bond prices. Global trade and capital flows are also slowing. The outlook calls for a challenging year with opportunities in quality companies and bonds offering higher yields. Flexibility will be needed to respond to changing opportunities and risks.
The document analyzes the cognitive and behavioral factors behind the 2008 financial crisis. It discusses how herd behavior, the availability heuristic, and groupthink led to ill-advised decisions that propagated the crisis. Herd behavior explained the housing bubble as investors followed each other into the overheated market. It also contributed to the boom and bust of the mortgage-backed securities market. The availability heuristic and groupthink affected decision making at financial institutions and government agencies. Letting Lehman Brothers fail unexpectedly triggered a global recession due to a loss of confidence propagating through herd behavior.
The document provides a recap and analysis of macroeconomic factors and their impact on the economy and financial markets from 2007 to 2009. It summarizes warnings in 2007 about the credit crisis, including rising lending standards, dependence on credit growth, and the bursting of the credit bubble. It describes shocks to the financial system in August 2007 and the Federal Reserve's response. While the stock market rallied on rate cuts, the document warns that the full economic impact was still unknown and that home prices and the economy remained at risk.
Similar to Secular StagnationWhy Might Equilibriu.docx (14)
Write a page to a page and half for each topic and read each topic a.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page to a page and half for each topic and read each topic and there attachment carefully and summarize
1-Mon Oct 28: The Conflict over Religious Authority in Post-Safavid Iran
Attached Files:
Attachment : Momen Akhbari School (1).pdf
Moojan Momen,
An Introduction to Shi’i Islam,
ch.6, 12.
2- Wed Oct 30: Imperial Reform Movements
Attached Files:
Tanzimat Decree (1).pdf
Tobacco Concession (2)pdf
25 Reform Movements (3) pptx
Cleveland,
Modern Middle East,
ch.5-6
Primary Sources:
Gulhane Edict (1839)
Hatt-i Humayun (1856)
Tobacco Concession
3- Fri Nov 1: Social and Intellectual Movements in the Early 20th Century
Attached Files:
alAfghani (1)
Abduh Theology of Unity (2)
.
Write a page discussing why you believe PMI is focusing BA as the fi.docxedgar6wallace88877
PMI focuses business analysis as the first step in the project management model because understanding requirements upfront helps define the scope and prevent issues down the road. Poor business analysis can negatively impact a project's success if the wrong objectives are identified or user needs aren't understood correctly. Validating ideas with citations is important to support opinions on why analysis is important for setting projects up for success.
Write a page of personal reflection of your present leadership compe.docxedgar6wallace88877
This document asks the reader to write a journal entry reflecting on their present leadership competencies, possible adjustments to their leadership approach, and how it relates to concepts of communication, leadership, and power and politics. The reflection should demonstrate a high level of understanding by adequately integrating authoritative sources with in-text citations in APA format.
Write a page of compare and contrast for the Big Five Personalit.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page of compare and contrast for the Big Five Personality Model against the MBTI. Attached some info below.
Based on what you have learned thus far, how might the MBTI lack for strong supporting evidence as opposed to the Big Five Model? Thoroughly explain.
After doing so discuss how the Big Five Traits could predict behavior at your place of employment. What could be some advantage of doing so?
What might be some disadvantages? Thoroughly explain.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with intext citations and references in APA format.
.
Write a page of research and discuss an innovation that includes mul.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page of research and discuss an innovation that includes multiple innovation types (per Keely). Discuss the types of innovation involved and comment on how you feel this combination could potentially create a sustainable competitive advantage for the business. Be sure to include references in APA format with intext citations.
.
Write a page answering the questions below.Sometimes projects .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a page answering the questions below.
Sometimes projects fail. Such failure can be contributed to unreasonable time constraints, poorly estimated financial estimates, poorly systematized planning process or organizational goals not understood at lower organizational levels.
As a project manager, what key factors are absolutely vital to prevent such failure?
Discuss the role of the leader and manager in a project environment or project initiative.
Be sure to identify how the duties of project managers reinforce the role of leadership. Use real-life examples.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
.
Write a one-paragraph summary of one of the reading assignments from.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-paragraph summary of one of the reading assignments from the textbook.
Reading assignments to choose from are
from Beowulf - trans. Burton Raffel
Children - Slawomir Mrozek
The Jar - Luigi Pirandello
Death of a Tsotsi - Alan Paton
Judges Must Balance Justice vs. Young Lives - Patricia Edmonds
Youth Violent Crime Keeps Climbing - J.L. Albert
Action Will Be Taken: An Action-Packed Story - Heinrich Boll
from The Life of Henry the Fifth - William Shakespeare
Speech, May 13, 1940 - Winston Churchill
The Thrill of the Grass - W.P. Kinsella
from Night - Elie Wiesel
This Too Is Everything - Shu Ting
A Marriage Proposal - Anton Chekhov
There's plenty more reading assignments in the book. If you can help me but need more choices let me know. Thanks
.
Write a one-paragraph summary of this article.Riordan, B. C..docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-paragraph summary of this article.
Riordan, B. C., Flett, J. A. M., Hunter, J. A., Scarf, D., & Conner, T. S. (2015). Fear of missing out (FoMO): the relationship between FoMO, alcohol use, and alcohol-related consequences in college students.
Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Functions
,
2
(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.7243/2055-3447-2-9
.
Write a one-paragraph response to the following topic. Use the MLA f.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-paragraph response to the following topic. Use the MLA format, and do not write in the first or second person. In addition, do not use contractions. Give specific details and examples to support your stance.
Many people in America still struggle with the concept of interracial dating. Is dating people of other races a sign of tolerance or of self-hatred? Should individuals date within their own race as a show of cultural pride or date other races as a way of combating racism and moving closer to equality? Originate your own ideas with vivid details and examples to support your stance. No secondary sources should be included in this response.
.
Write a one-page rhetorical analysis in which you analyze the argume.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one-page rhetorical analysis in which you analyze the argument in the passage from “The Crisis” through three lenses:
•Identify the parts of his argument and explain how they work together to build an effective argument
•Identify and explain the impact of persuasive techniques
•Explain how Paine “enters the conversation” about the topic in his argument
.
Write a one pageliterature review of your figure( FIGURE A.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page
literature review of your figure
( FIGURE ASSIGNED 6 d-g)
Abstract: What is the question they were trying to answer, and what were their overall conclusions
Introduction: Introduce, briefly, the endomembrane system and how proteins move back and forth. Describe the importance of the KDEL sequence. What is the question they are trying to answer in your figure? How does this question relate to the larger context of the whole paper?
Body: What technique are they using? Briefly describe the technique. For each experiment tell me specifically what the variables are from that technique for that experiment (so which antibody are they using, and how did they prepare the samples) . How can that particular antibody or preparation help them to answer their question. What were their observations? What do they see?
Conclusions: What do they conclude from this figure or part of a figure?
This description, must be IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Focus, on the parts of the signaling cascade that they are trying to understand.
.
Write a one page-paper documenting the problemneed you wish to .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page-paper documenting the problem/need you wish to address for the
Community Need Project Proposal, due in Week 6
, and the important stakeholders related to your project. Why is this a need in your community? Who is involved in this problem and why are they important?
homelessness in San Antonio TX
.
Write a one page report on Chapter 1 and 2 with the same style of mo.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page report on Chapter 1 and 2 with the same style of module 1 assignment and it's requirement. Please add subtitle to your paper including a name for your paper, major topics under consideration, conclusion (a paragraph of personal
experience
) and a reference list. Keep your citations and references as a evidence for the midterm and final.
.
Write a one page reflection about the following1) Identify .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page reflection about the following:
1) Identify the key messages about being female that you saw in tv and magazine adds, including movies.
2) Do you feel the media/images affect both sexes the same? If not, why not?
3) Have you found your sense of self affected by media images? In what ways?
.
Write a one page paper on the question belowSome of the current.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page paper on the question below:
Some of the current trends in the delivery of value (channels, logistics, supply chain) include e-commerce; VMS; use of multi-channel approaches; mobile commerce; social retailing; and more. From your own research, discuss how two companies are using are using these techniques to improve their delivery of value to consumers.
.
Write a one page paper (double spaced) describing and discussing the.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page paper (double spaced) describing and discussing the following ethical concepts found in chapter 1; logical, factual and normative. You may use definitions or scenarios in your writing. The goal of this paper is to gain a level of understanding of all three (logical, factual and normative).
Textbook:
1.
Logical, or formal, statements
are definitions or statements derivable from
definitions, including the entirety of mathematical discourse (e.g., “2
+
2
=
4,”
or “A square has four equal sides”). Such statements can be
verified by a for
-
mal procedure
(“recourse to arithmetic”) derived from the same definitions
that control the rest of the terms of the field in question (i.e., the same axioms
define “2,” “4,” and the procedure of “addition”; the four equal sides and right
angles define the “square”). True formal statements are
analytic
:
they are true
logically, necessarily, or by the definitions of the terms
. False statements in
this category are
self–contradictory
. (If you say, “2
+
2
=
5,” or start talking
about “round squares,” you contradict yourself, for you assert that which can-
not possibly be so—you conjoin ideas that are incompatible). A logically true
or logically valid statement can never be false, or disproved by any discovery
of facts; it will never be the case that some particular pairs of 2 do not add up
to 4, or some particular squares turn out to be circular—and if you think you’ve
found such a case, you’re wrong! “2
+
2
=
4” is true, and squares are equi-
lateral rectangles, as philosophers like to say,
in all possible worlds
. For this
reason we say that these statements are “
true a priori
”: we can know them to
be correct prior to any examination of the facts of the world, without having to
count up lots of pairs of pairs, just to make sure that 2
+
2 really equals 4.
2.
Factual, or empirical, statements
are assertions about the world out there, the
physical environment of our existence, including the entirety of scientific dis-
course, from theoretical physics to sociology. Such statements are
verifiable by
controlled observation
(“recourse to measurement,” “recourse to weighing”)
of that world, by experiment or just by careful looking, listening, touching,
smelling, or tasting. This is the world of our senses, the world of space, objects,
time and causation. These empirical statements are called
synthetic,
for they
“put together” in a new combination two ideas that do not initially include or
entail each other. As a result they cannot be known a priori, but can be deter
-
mined only
a posteriori, that is, after investigation of the world
. When they
are true, they are
true only contingently, or dependently, as oppo.
write a one page about this topic and provide a reference.Will.docxedgar6wallace88877
write a one page about this topic and provide a reference.
Will making changes to the built environments (adding parks, sidewalks, healthy food stores, playgrounds, green-spaces, safer streets, etc.) of low-income neighborhoods be adequate enough to help community members combat health disparities based upon income or race? Why or why not?
.
Write a one or more paragraph on the following question below.docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one or more paragraph on the following question below:
The three characteristics required by an individual to be considered a dependent of another taxpayer by the IRS.
The four tests stipulated by the IRS that a taxpayer must satisfy to claim a dependent as a qualifying child
What do you think are the reasons the IRS included the four tests for a qualifying child to be claimed as a dependent?
.
Write a one or more page paper on the following belowWhy are .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one or more page paper on the following below:
Why are systems for collaboration and social business so important and what technologies do they use? Explain the benefits of collaboration and social business. Describe what organizational culture is necessary for business processes and collaboration.
.
Write a one page dialogue in which two characters are arguing but .docxedgar6wallace88877
Write a one page dialogue in which two characters are arguing but are speaking every thought, every iteration of subtext. Then go back and cut the dialogue so that no line is longer than five words without losing any of the meaning.
1. I'd like for you to submit both versions of your dialog.
The first version (with all the subtext written out) and the second version (with only 5 words per line.)
2. Be sure to write it in dialog format.
That means it should look like the plays in our text--
James: Starting with the character's name?
Carrie: And with little or no narration outside of the dialog?
Prof.: Yes to both questions!
3. Notice how little narration / stage direction there is in most of the sample dialogs.
Your dialog should be almost entirely dialog!
Try to resist the urge to get carried away explaining every little detail of what the characters are doing.
And resist the urge to add modifiers like (angrily) (with great emotion) (etc.) before each line of dialog.
You want to put everything into the dialog itself-- the emotion should be obvious from what the characters say!
.
How to Setup Default Value for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, we can set a default value for a field during the creation of a record for a model. We have many methods in odoo for setting a default value to the field.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
How to Download & Install Module From the Odoo App Store in Odoo 17Celine George
Custom modules offer the flexibility to extend Odoo's capabilities, address unique requirements, and optimize workflows to align seamlessly with your organization's processes. By leveraging custom modules, businesses can unlock greater efficiency, productivity, and innovation, empowering them to stay competitive in today's dynamic market landscape. In this tutorial, we'll guide you step by step on how to easily download and install modules from the Odoo App Store.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
A Free 200-Page eBook ~ Brain and Mind Exercise.pptxOH TEIK BIN
(A Free eBook comprising 3 Sets of Presentation of a selection of Puzzles, Brain Teasers and Thinking Problems to exercise both the mind and the Right and Left Brain. To help keep the mind and brain fit and healthy. Good for both the young and old alike.
Answers are given for all the puzzles and problems.)
With Metta,
Bro. Oh Teik Bin 🙏🤓🤔🥰
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...
Secular StagnationWhy Might Equilibriu.docx
1. Secular Stagnation
Why Might Equilibrium Real Rates Have Fallen?
Increased Savings
Changes in distribution of income and profits share
Reserve accumulation or capital flight
Increasing deleveraging and retirement preparation
Decreases in Investment Propensity
Declining growth rate of population and/or technology
Demassification of the economy
Fall in price of capital goods
Other factors
Increased global save asset demand
2. 3/14/2020 The Age of Secular Stagnation | Larry Summers
larrysummers.com/2016/02/17/the-age-of-secular-stagnation/
1/6
HOME CONTACT SEARCH
Lawrence H.
Summers is the
Charles W. Eliot
University Professor
and President
Emeritus at Harvard University. He
served as the 71st Secretary of the
Treasury for President Clinton and
the Director of the National Economic
Council for President Obama.
FULL BIO
Larry Summers on
SECULAR STAGNATION READ MORE
FOLLOW @LHSUMMERS
on Twitter
Larry Summers
COMMENTARY RESEARCH TEACHING MEDIA
RESOURCES
Summers published an article title, “The Age of Secular
Stagnation: What It Is and What to Do About It,” in the
3. February
issue of Foreign A�airs. The article explores how expansionary
�scal policy by the U.S. government can help overcome secular
stagnation problems and get growth back on track.
The Age of Secular Stagnation: What It Is and What to Do
About It
February 15, 2016
published in Foreign A�airs
As surprising as the recent �nancial crisis [1] and recession
were, the behavior of the
world’s industrialized economies and �nancial markets during
the recovery [2] has been
even more so.
Most observers expected the unusually deep recession to be
followed by an unusually
rapid recovery, with output and employment returning to trend
levels relatively quickly.
Yet even with the U.S. Federal Reserve [3]’s aggressive
monetary policies, the recovery
(both in the United States and around the globe) has fallen
signi�cantly short of
predictions and has been far weaker than its predecessors [4].
Had the American
economy performed as the Congressional Budget O�ce fore cast
in August 2009—after
the stimulus had been passed and the recovery had started—U.S.
GDP today would be
about $1.3 trillion higher than it is.
Almost no one in 2009 imagined that U.S. interest rates would
stay near zero for six
4. years, that key interest rates in Europe would turn negative, and
that central banks in the
G-7 would collectively expand their balance sheets by more
than $5 trillion. Had
economists been told such monetary policies lay ahead,
moreover, they would have
con�dently predicted that in�ation would become a serious
problem—and would have
been shocked to �nd out that across the United States, Europe,
and Japan, it has
generally remained well below two percent.
In the wake of the crisis, governments’ debt-to-GDP ratios have
risen sharply, from 41
percent in 2008 to 74 percent today in the United States, from
47 percent to 70 percent
in Europe, and from 95 percent to 126 percent in Japan. Yet
long-term interest rates are
still remarkably low, with ten-year government bond rates at
around two percent in the
United States, around 0.5 percent in Germany, and around 0.2
percent in Japan as of the
beginning of 2016. Such low long-term rates suggest that
markets currently expect both
low in�ation and low real interest rates to continue for many
years. With appropriate
caveats about the complexities of drawing inferences from
indexed bond markets, it is
fair to say that in�ation for the entire industrial world is
expected to be close to one
percent for another decade and that real interest rates are
expected to be around zero
over that time frame. In other words, nearly seven years into the
U.S. recovery, markets
are not expecting “normal” conditions to return anytime soon.
5. The key to understanding this situation lies in the concept of
secular stagnation [5], �rst
put forward by the economist Alvin Hansen in the 1930s. The
economies of the industrial
world, in this view, su�er from an imbalance resulting from an
increasing propensity to
save and a decreasing propensity to invest. The result is that
excessive saving acts as a
drag on demand, reducing growth and in�ation, and the
imbalance between savings and
investment pulls down real interest rates. When signi�cant
growth is achieved,
meanwhile—as in the United States between 2003 and 2007—it
comes from dangerous
levels of borrowing that translate excess savings into
unsustainable levels of investment
(which in this case emerged as a housing bubble).
Other explanations for what is happening have been proposed,
notably Kenneth Rogo�’s
theory of a debt overhang, Robert Gordon [6]’s theory of
supply-side headwinds, Ben
Bernanke’s theory of a savings glut [7], and Paul Krugman’s
theory of a liquidity trap. All
of these have some validity, but the secular stagnation theory
o�ers the most
The Age of Secular Stagnation
Print Email
258
36
7. comprehensive account of the situation and the best basis for
policy prescriptions. The
good news is that although developments in China [8] and
elsewhere raise the risks that
global economic conditions will deteriorate, an expansionary
�scal policy by the U.S.
government can help overcome the secular stagnation problem
and get growth back on
track.
STUCK IN NEUTRAL
Just as the price of wheat adjusts to balance the supply of and
demand for wheat, it is
natural to suppose that interest rates—the price of money—
adjust to balance the supply
of savings and the demand for investment in an economy.
Excess savings tend to drive
interest rates down, and excess investment demand tends to
drive them up. Following
the Swedish economist Knut Wicksell, it is common to refer to
the real interest rate that
balances saving and investment at full employment as the
“natural,” or “neutral,” real
interest rate. Secular stagnation occurs when neutral real
interest rates are su�ciently
low that they cannot be achieved through conventional central-
bank policies. At that
point, desired levels of saving exceed desired levels of
investment, leading to shortfalls in
demand and stunted growth.
This picture �ts with much of what we have seen in recent
years. Real interest rates are
very low, demand has been sluggish, and in�ation is low, just
as one would expect in the
8. presence of excess saving. Absent many good new investment
opportunities, savings
have tended to �ow into existing assets, causing asset price
in�ation.
For secular stagnation to be a plausible hypothesis, there have
to be good reasons to
suppose that neutral real interest rates have been declining and
are now abnormally
low. And in fact, a number of recent studies have tried to look
at this question and have
generally found declines of several percentage points. Even
more convincing is the
increasing body of evidence suggesting that over the last
generation, various factors
have increased the propensity of populations in developed
countries to save and
reduced their propensity to invest. Greater saving has been
driven by increases in
inequality and in the share of income going to the wealthy,
increases in uncertainty
about the length of retirement and the availability of bene�ts,
reductions in the ability to
borrow (especially against housing), and a greater accumulation
of assets by foreign
central banks and sovereign wealth funds. Reduced investment
has been driven by
slower growth in the labor force, the availability of cheaper
capital goods, and tighter
credit (with lending more highly regulated than before).
Perhaps most important, the new economy [9] tends to conserve
capital. Apple and
Google, for example, are the two largest U.S. companies and are
eager to push the
frontiers of technology [10] forward, yet both are awash in cash
9. and are under pressure
to distribute more of it to their shareholders. Think about
Airbnb’s impact on hotel
construction, Uber’s impact on automobile demand, Amazon’s
impact on the
construction of malls, or the more general impact of information
technology on the
demand for copiers, printers, and o�ce space. And in a period
of rapid technological
change, it can make sense to defer investment lest new
technology soon make the old
obsolete.
Various studies have explored the impact of these factors and
attempted to estimate the
extent to which they have reduced neutral real interest rates.
The most recent and
thorough of these, by Lukasz Rachel and Thomas Smith at the
Bank of England,
concluded that for the industrial world, neutral real interest
rates have declined by about
4.5 percentage points over the last 30 years and are likely to
stay low in the future.
Together with the current price of long-term bonds, this
suggests that the kind of Japan-
style stagnation that has plagued the industrial world in recent
years may be with us for
quite some time.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Not all economists are sold on the secular stagnation
hypothesis. Building on the
monumental history of �nancial crises he wrote with Carmen
Reinhart, for example,
Rogo� ascribes current di�culties to excessive debt buildups
10. and subsequent
deleveraging. But although these surely contributed to the
�nancial crisis, they seem
insu�cient to account for the prolonged slow recovery.
Moreover, the debt buildups
theory provides no natural explanation for the generation-long
trend toward lower
neutral real interest rates. It seems more logical to see the debt
buildups decried by
Rogo� as not simply exogenous events but rather the
consequence of a growing excess
of saving over investment and the easy monetary policies
necessary to maintain full
employment.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2016-01-11/end-
chinas-rise
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-
industrial-revolution
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/thinkers-
and-tinkerers
3/14/2020 The Age of Secular Stagnation | Larry Summers
larrysummers.com/2016/02/17/the-age-of-secular-stagnation/
3/6
Gordon, meanwhile, has argued for what might be called
supply-side secular stagnation
—a fundamental decline in the rate of productivity growth
relative to its golden age,
from 1870 to 1970. Gordon is likely right that over the next
several years, the growth in
the potential output of the American economy and in the real
wages of American
11. workers will be quite slow. But if the primary culprit were
declining supply (as opposed
to declining demand), one would expect to see in�ation
accelerate rather than
decelerate.
For a decade, Bernanke has emphasized the idea of a savings
glut emanating from cash
thrown o� by emerging markets. This was indeed an important
factor in adding to
excess saving in the developed world a decade ago, and it may
well be again if emerging
markets continue to experience growing capital �ight. But both
the timing and the scale
of capital export from emerging markets make it unlikely that it
is the principal reason
for the major recent declines in neutral real interest rates.
Krugman and some others have sought to explain recent events
and make policy
recommendations based on the old Keynesian concept of
a liquidity trap [11]. As
Krugman has emphasized, this line of thinking is parallel to the
secular stagnation one.
But most treatments of the liquidity trap treat it as a temporary
phenomenon rather
than a potentially permanent state of a�airs, which is what the
evidence seems to be
showing.
Perhaps the most comforting alternative view is that secular
stagnation may have indeed
occurred in the past but is no longer operating in the present.
With the unemployment
rate down to �ve percent and the Fed embarked on a tightening
cycle, the argument
12. runs, indicators will start returning to earlier, higher growth
trends. Perhaps. But
markets are betting that the Fed will not be able to tighten
monetary policy nearly as
much as it expects, and if another recession starts in the next
few years, cuts will soon
bring interest rates back down to the zero lower bound.
LET’S GET FISCAL
Up to the 1970s, most economists believed that if governments
managed demand
properly, their countries’ economies could enjoy low
unemployment and high output
with relatively modest in�ation. The proper task of
macroeconomists, it followed, was to
use monetary and �scal policy to manage demand well. But this
thinking was eventually
challenged from two directions—in theory, by Milton
Friedman [12], Robert Lucas, and
others, and in practice, by the experience of high in�ation
together with high
unemployment.
The emergence of such “stag�ation” in the late 1970s [13] led
to general acceptance of
the natural-rate hypothesis, the idea that abnormally low
unemployment causes
in�ation to accelerate. According to this view, since
policymakers would not accept
permanently rising rates of in�ation, economies would tend to
�uctuate around a
natural rate of unemployment, determined by factors such as
labor �exibility, the
availability of bene�ts, and the e�ectiveness of hiring and job
searches. By skillfully
13. managing demand, policymakers could aspire to reduce the
amplitude of the
�uctuations—and although they could determine the average
rate of in�ation, they
could not raise the average level of output.
By the mid 1980s, once in�ation had been brought down from
double-digit levels, a
consensus on macroeconomic policy emerged. The central
objective of policy, most
mainstream economists believed, should be to achieve a low and
relatively stable rate of
in�ation, since there were no permanent gains to be had from
higher in�ation. This
could best be accomplished, it was thought, by �rmly
establishing the political
independence of central banks and by setting in�ation targets in
order to control
expectations. Fiscal policy, meanwhile, was not considered to
have a primary role in
managing demand, because it was slow acting and might push
interest rates up and
because monetary policy could do what was needed.
Seen through the lens of the secular stagnation hypothesis,
however, all these
propositions are problematic. If it were possible to avoid
secular stagnation, then it
would indeed be possible to increase average levels of output
substantially, raising the
stakes for demand management policy. The danger in monetary
policy, moreover, lies
not in politicians eager to in�ate away problems but in bankers
refusing to generate
enough demand to bring in�ation up to target levels and permit
reductions in real
14. interest rates. And �scal policy, �nally, takes on new
signi�cance as a tool in economic
stabilization.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/11/monetary-policy-
in-a-liquidity-trap/?_r=0
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2007-
05-01/milton-friedman-biography
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1979-09-
01/stagflation-how-we-got-it-how-get-out
3/14/2020 The Age of Secular Stagnation | Larry Summers
larrysummers.com/2016/02/17/the-age-of-secular-stagnation/
4/6
As of yet, none of these principles has been fully accepted by
policymakers in the
advanced industrial world. It is true that central banks have
sought, through quantitative
easing, to loosen monetary conditions even with short-term
interest rates at rock
bottom. But they have treated these policies as a short-term
expedient, not a longer-
term necessity. More important, these policies are running into
diminishing returns and
giving rise to increasingly toxic side e�ects. Sustained low
rates tend to promote excess
leverage, risk taking, and asset bubbles.
This does not mean that quantitative easing was mistaken.
Without such policies, output
would likely be even lower, and the world economy might well
have tipped into de�ation.
But monetary-policy makers need to acknowledge much more
15. explicitly that neutral real
rates have fallen substantially and that the task now is to adjust
policy accordingly. This
could include setting targets for nominal GDP growth rather
than in�ation, investing in a
wider range of risk assets, making plans to allow base rates to
turn negative, and
underscoring the importance of avoiding a new recession.
When the primary policy challenge for central banks was
establishing credibility that the
printing press was under control, it was appropriate for them to
jealously guard their
independence. When the challenge is to accelerate, rather than
brake, economies, more
cooperation with domestic �scal authorities and foreign
counterparts is necessary.
The core problem of secular stagnation is that the neutral real
interest rate is too low.
This rate, however, cannot be increased through monetary
policy. Indeed, to the extent
that easy money works by accelerating investments and pulling
forward demand, it will
actually reduce neutral real rates later on. That is why primary
responsibility for
addressing secular stagnation should rest with �scal policy. An
expansionary �scal policy
can reduce national savings, raise neutral real interest rates, and
stimulate growth.
Fiscal policy has other virtues as well, particularly when
pursued through public
investment. A time of low real interest rates, low materials
prices, and high construction
unemployment is the ideal moment for a large public investment
16. program. It is tragic,
therefore, that in the United States today, federal infrastructure
investment, net of
depreciation, is running close to zero, and net government
investment is lower than at
any time in nearly six decades.
It is true that an expansionary �scal policy would increase
de�cits, and many worry that
running larger de�cits would place larger burdens on later
generations, who will already
face the challenges of an aging society. But those future
generations will be better o�
owing lots of money in long-term bonds at low rates in a
currency they can print than
they would be inheriting a vast deferred maintenance liability.
Traditional concern with �scal de�cits has focused on their
impact in pushing up interest
rates and retarding investment. Yet by setting yields so low and
bond prices so high,
markets are sending a clear signal that they want more, not less,
government debt. By
stimulating growth and enabling an in�ation increase that
would permit a reduction in
real capital costs, �scal expansion now would crowd investment
in rather than out. Well-
intentioned proposals to curtail prospective pension bene�ts, in
contrast, might make
matters even worse by encouraging increased saving and
reduced consumption, thus
exacerbating secular stagnation.
The main constraint on the industrial world’s economy today is
on the demand, rather
than the supply, side. This means that measures that increase
17. potential supply by
promoting �exibility are therefore less important than measures
that o�er the potential
to increase demand, such as regulatory reform and business tax
reform. Other structural
policies that would promote demand include steps to accelerate
investments in
renewable technologies that could replace fossil fuels and
measures to raise the share of
total income going to those with a high propensity to consume,
such as support for
unions and increased minimum wages. Thus, John Maynard
Keynes, writing in a similar
situation during the late 1930s, rightly emphasized the need for
policy approaches that
both promoted business con�dence—the cheapest form of
stimulus—and increased
labor compensation.
TO HANGZHOU AND BEYOND
If each of the countries facing secular stagnation today were to
confront it successfully
on its own, the results would be very favorable for the global
economy. But international
focus and coordination have crucial additional roles to play.
Secular stagnation, after all, increases the contagion from
economic weakness. In normal
times, if the rest of the world economy su�ers, the United
States or any other a�ected
3/14/2020 The Age of Secular Stagnation | Larry Summers
18. larrysummers.com/2016/02/17/the-age-of-secular-stagnation/
5/6
economy can o�set the loss of demand and competitiveness
through monetary easing.
With monetary policy already at its lower limit, however,
additional easing is impossible
(or at least much more di�cult), and so each country’s stake in
the strength of the global
economy is greatly magni�ed.
Secular stagnation also increases the danger of competitive
monetary easing and even
of currency wars. Looser money, starting with near-zero capital
costs, is likely to
generate demand primarily through increases in
competitiveness. This is a zero-sum
game, since currency movements switch demand from one
country to another rather
than increase it globally. Fiscal expansions, in contrast, raise
demand on a global basis.
International coordination is thus necessary to avoid an
excessive and self-defeating
reliance on monetary policy and achieve a mutually rewarding
reliance on �scal policy to
address problems.
Movements in commodity prices in recent months have shown
that events in emerging
markets, especially China, can have signi�cant impacts
globally. It now appears likely that
more capital will �ow out of emerging markets and less will
�ow in than has been the
case in recent years. These capital out�ows and the consequent
increases in net exports
will further reduce demand and neutral real rates in the
19. developed world, thereby
exacerbating secular stagnation. Policies that help restore
con�dence in emerging
markets, therefore, will also strengthen the global economy.
These issues were recognized at the successful G-20 summit in
London in April 2009
(although the problems were misdiagnosed as cyclical and
temporary rather than
secular and enduring). The common commitments undertaken
there to engage in �scal
expansion, strengthen �nancial regulation, resist trade
protection, and enhance the
capacity of international �nancial institutions to respond to
problems in emerging
markets were e�ective in halting the collapse of the global
economy. Unfortunately,
subsequent G-20 summits returned to their traditional lethargy
and misguided
preoccupation with �scal austerity, monetary normalization,
and moral hazard, ending
up missing opportunities to accelerate the recovery.
This year, the Chinese will host a G-20 summit in September. If
China chooses to
recognize how important global growth is for its economy, and
how important its
economy is for global growth, it could perform a great service
by reinvigorating
international economic cooperation. The key priority in
Hangzhou—as it was in London
back in 2009—should be increasing global demand and making
sure that it picks up
particularly in those countries where there is the most economic
slack.
20. In this regard, China’s decisions about its own economic a�airs
will be crucial. To date,
the international community has joined Chinese �nancial
o�cials in urging China’s
political leadership to pursue �nancial liberalization. This is
surely correct for the long
run. But it may well be in China’s and the global interest that
the liberalization process
proceed more gradually than is currently envisioned, so that
capital out�ows from China
do not threaten China’s own �nancial stability and spread
weakness to the global
economy at large.
As the euro has declined sharply, meanwhile, any recovery that
Europe has achieved has
come largely from increases in competitiveness that reduce
growth elsewhere. Germany
now leads the world with a trade surplus equal to a whopping
eight percent of GDP. The
global community should encourage Europe to generate
domestic demand as it seeks to
expand its economy.
One more priority in Hangzhou should be promoting global
infrastructure investment. In
this regard, the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment
Bank [14] is a valuable step
forward, and it should be strongly supported by the global
community, even as it is
encouraged to respect international norms and standards relating
to issues such as
environmental protection and integrity in procurement. And
e�orts to support
infrastructure investment elsewhere, such as the Obama
administration’s Power Africa
25. Earthquake
Why it happened, endured and wasn’t foreseen. And how it’s
changing theory
Lawrence J. Christiano | Consultant
Published February 7, 2017
Economic Policy Papers are based on policy-oriented research
produced by Minneapolis Fed staff and consultants. The
papers are an occasional series for a general audience. The
views expressed here are those of the authors, not necessarily
those of others in the Federal Reserve System.
Executive Summary
The Great Recession was particularly severe and has endured
far
longer than most recessions. Economists now believe it was
caused by a perfect storm of declining home prices, a financial
system heavily invested in house-related assets and a shadow
banking system highly vulnerable to bank runs or rollover risk.
It
has lasted longer than most recessions because economically
damaged households were unwilling or unable to increase
spending, thus perpetuating the recession by a mechanism
known
as the paradox of thrift. Economists believe the Great Recession
wasn’t foreseen because the size and fragility of the shadow
banking system had gone unnoticed.
The recession has had an inordinate impact on macroeconomics
as a discipline, leading economists to reconsider two largely
discarded theories: IS-LM and the paradox of thrift. It has also
forced theorists to better understand and incorporate the
financial
sector into their models, the most promising of which focus on
26. mismatch between the maturity periods of assets and liabilities
held by banks.
Introduction
Latest Content from
the Minneapolis Fed
Minneapolis Fed Releases Report on
Early Childhood Development in
Montana
News Releases
Slow Convergence in Economies with
Organization Capital
Working Paper
Early Childhood Development in
Montana
Community Development Papers
WSJ Op-Ed: Immigration Is Practically a
Free Lunch for America
Messages
Equity and Efficiency in Space
The Region
Connect
MinneapolisFed on Twitter
Minneapolis Fed on Facebook
RSS Feeds
About the Fed Banking Supervision Economic Research
Regional Economy Community & Education News & Events
Publications
28. https://minneapolisfed.org/community
https://minneapolisfed.org/news-and-events
https://minneapolisfed.org/publications
1/22/2018 The Great Recession: A Macroeconomic Earthquake |
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
https://minneapolisfed.org/research/economic-policy-
papers/the-great-recession-a-macroeconomic-earthquake 2/8
The Great Recession struck individuals, the aggregate economy
and the economics profession like an earthquake, and its
aftershocks are still being felt. Job losses and housing
foreclosures devastated many families. National economies
were
deeply damaged and have yet to fully recover. And
economists—
who failed to predict either the crisis or the recession— have
been
struggling to understand why they didn’t grasp the fragility of
the
financial system and the duration of the recession.
This essay briefly discusses why the Great Recession is
considered both “Great” and a “Recession.” It then turns to the
emerging consensus about its cause, its duration and the reasons
so few predicted it. Finally, it explores the impact of the Great
Recession on how academic economists now think about the
economy.
“Great Recession”
The economic downturn the United States suffered from late
2007
to the third quarter of 2009 was particularly damaging. Output,
consumption, investment, employment and total hours worked
29. dropped far more during the recent recession than the
comparable average figures for all other recessions since 1945.
Employment, for example, dropped 6.7 percent during the 2007-
09 recession compared with an average of 3.8 percent for
postwar recessions. Analogous figures for output: 7.2 percent
and
4.4 percent; for consumption: 5.4 percent and 2.1 percent. That
higher level of severity across the board is why this recession
has
earned the adjective “Great.”
By the same token, however, this recession was definitely not
the
worst U.S. downturn on record. Conditions were far worse
during
the Great Depression. Employment fell 27 percent from 1929 to
1933 (compared with 6.7 percent from 2007 to 2009), output
fell
36 percent (7.2 percent) and consumption fell 23 percent (5.4
percent). For that reason, the recent slump, though severe, is
rightly considered a recession rather than a full-bore depression.
Another reason to consider this recession “Great” is how
uncommonly long the economy has been taking to recover. The
accompanying figure displays labor productivity (output per
working-age person, adjusted for inflation) from 1977 through
2014. The vertical pink bars in the figure indicate the starting
and
ending dates for recessions, as determined by the National
Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
1
1/22/2018 The Great Recession: A Macroeconomic Earthquake |
30. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
https://minneapolisfed.org/research/economic-policy-
papers/the-great-recession-a-macroeconomic-earthquake 3/8
The U.S. economy did not return to the 2007 level of output per
capita until a little over five years later, in first quarter 2013.
The
productivity trend lines for the previous four recessions show
that
the economy usually snaps back more quickly. Even now, the
U.S. economy is still about 10 percent below normal (that is,
trend
growth in 2007).
What caused the Great Recession?
Conventional wisdom is now converging on a particular
narrative
about the cause of the Great Recession. In effect, the Great
Recession was a “perfect storm” created by the concurrence of
three factors. Taken by itself, none of these factors would have
caused a major recession, but in combination, they were
explosive.
The first was the decline in housing prices that began in the
summer of 2007. Whether this was the end of a “bubble” or just
an ordinary fluctuation does not matter for the narrative. The
second factor was that the financial system was heavily invested
in housing-related assets, mortgage-backed securities. The third
factor was that the shadow banking system was invested in
housing assets and highly vulnerable to bank runs.
These three factors are the essential elements in the following
narrative about the Great Recession.
The fall in housing prices damaged the assets of the shadow
31. banking system and thereby created the conditions in which a
run
on the shadow banking system could occur. Alas, a run did
occur
in the summer of 2007, forcing the shadow banking system to
sell
its assets at fire sale prices.
This asset decline damaged the whole banking system and
hindered its ability to intermediate not just house purchases, but
investment more generally. With reduced credit, purchases of
houses declined and the fall in house prices was reinforced.
By reducing household wealth, the fall in house prices induced
households to cut back on spending. Faced with declining sales,
firms pulled back on investment and hiring. All of these factors
reinforced each other, sending the economy into the tailspin
documented above.
2
3
4
5
6
1/22/2018 The Great Recession: A Macroeconomic Earthquake |
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
https://minneapolisfed.org/research/economic-policy-
papers/the-great-recession-a-macroeconomic-earthquake 4/8
32. Why has it lasted so long?
The conventional view on why the recession lasted so long is
that
the events described in the previous paragraph reinforced the
desire to save, relative to the desire to invest. If markets worked
efficiently, then the interest rate would have fallen to balance
the
demand and supply of savings, without a significant fall in
employment. According to the conventional view, this required
that interest rates be substantially negative, something that
could
not be achieved because the nominal interest rate cannot be
much below zero. Because interest rates could not fall enough
to
clear lending markets, something else had to bring the demand
and supply of saving into equality. That something else was the
fall in aggregate output and income, which allowed lending
markets to clear by reducing saving as people tried to avoid
reducing their consumption too much. This is essentially the
logic
of the “paradox of thrift” analyzed in undergraduate textbooks
in
macroeconomics. Consistent with those textbooks, the fall in
output arising from this paradox-of-thrift reasoning could in
principle last for a long time.
Why didn’t policymakers or economists see it coming?
The emerging consensus is that no one, neither policymakers
nor
academic economists, was aware of the third factor underlying
the
Great Recession, the size and fragility of the shadow banking
sector (see, for example, Bernanke 2010). The reason is simple.
Much of what policymakers and economists know about
financial
33. markets comes about as a side effect of regulation, and the
shadow banking system existed mostly outside the normal
regulatory framework.
Impact on macroeconomics
The Great Recession is having an enormous impact on
macroeconomics as a discipline, in two ways. First, it is leading
economists to reconsider two theories that had largely been
discredited or neglected. Second, it has led the profession to
find
ways to incorporate the financial sector into macroeconomic
theory.
Neglected paradigms
At its heart, the narrative described above characterizes the
Great
Recession as the response of the economy to a negative shock to
the demand for goods all across the board. This is very much in
the spirit of the traditional macroeconomic paradigm captured
by
the famous IS-LM (or Hicks-Hansen) model, which places
demand shocks like this at the heart of its theory of business
cycle
fluctuations. Similarly, the paradox-of-thrift argument is also
expressed naturally in the IS-LM model.
The IS-LM paradigm, together with the paradox of thrift and the
notion that a decision by a group of people could give rise to a
welfare-reducing drop in output, had been largely discredited
among professional macroeconomists since the 1980s. But the
Great Recession seems impossible to understand without
invoking paradox-of-thrift logic and appealing to shocks in
aggregate demand. As a consequence, the modern equivalent of
the IS-LM model—the New Keynesian model—has returned to
center stage. (To be fair, the return of the IS-LM model began
in
34. 7
8
9
10
11
12
1/22/2018 The Great Recession: A Macroeconomic Earthquake |
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
https://minneapolisfed.org/research/economic-policy-
papers/the-great-recession-a-macroeconomic-earthquake 5/8
the late 1990s, but the Great Recession dramatically accelerated
the process.)
The return of the dynamic version of the IS-LM model is
revolutionary because that model is closely allied with the view
that the economic system can sometimes become dysfunctional,
necessitating some form of government intervention. This is a
big
shift from the dominant view in the macroeconomics profession
in
the wake of the costly high inflation of the 1970s. Because that
inflation was viewed as a failure of policy, many economists in
the
1980s were comfortable with models that imply markets work
well
35. by themselves and government intervention is typically
unproductive.
Accounting for the financial sector
The Great Recession has had a second important effect on the
practice of macroeconomics. Before the Great Recession, there
was a consensus among professional macroeconomists that
dysfunction in the financial sector could safely be ignored by
macroeconomic theory. The idea was that what happens on Wall
Street stays on Wall Street—that is, it has as little impact on the
economy as what happens in Las Vegas casinos. This idea
received support from the U.S. experiences in 1987 and the
early
2000s, when the economy seemed unfazed by substantial stock
market volatility. But the idea that financial markets could be
ignored in macroeconomics died with the Great Recession.
Now macroeconomists are actively thinking about the financial
system, how it interacts with the broader economy and how it
should be regulated. This has necessitated the construction of
new models that incorporate finance, and the models that are
empirically successful have generally integrated financial
factors
into a version of the New Keynesian model, for the reasons
discussed above. (See, for example, Christiano, Motto and
Rostagno 2014.)
Economists have made much progress in this direction, too
much
to summarize in this brief essay. One particularly notable set of
advances is seen in recent research by Mark Gertler, Nobuhiro
Kiyotaki and Andrea Prestipino. (See Gertler and Kiyotaki 2015
and Gertler, Kiyotaki and Prestipino 2016.) In their models,
banks
finance long-term assets with short-term liabilities. This
liquidity
36. mismatch between assets and liabilities captures the essential
reason that real world financial institutions are vulnerable to
runs.
As such, the model enables economists to think precisely about
the narrative described above (and advocated by Bernanke 2010
and others) about what launched the Great Recession in 2007.
Refining models of this kind is essential for understanding the
root
causes of severe economic downturns and for designing
regulatory and other policies that can prevent a recurrence of
disasters like the Great Recession.
Endnotes
1 The output and population data were obtained from FRED, the
online database maintained by the Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis. The FRED label for the output measure is GDPC1, and
the
label for the working-age population is LFWA64TTUSQ647S.
1/22/2018 The Great Recession: A Macroeconomic Earthquake |
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
https://minneapolisfed.org/research/economic-policy-
papers/the-great-recession-a-macroeconomic-earthquake 6/8
2 The exact amount of time required for per capita output to
return
to its prerecession peak depends somewhat on the population
measure used. If instead the civilian non-institutional
population
measure (FRED label CNP16OV) were used, then the amount of
time would have been longer, roughly seven years. The
difference
37. from the results in the figure reflects demographic factors that
cause the working-age population to grow less rapidly than the
population as a whole.
3 For additional discussion about the trend of U.S. economic
output in 2007, see Christiano, Eichenbaum and Trabandt
(2015).
The 10 percent number in the text was rounded after doing the
following calculations. I fit a linear time trend to the natural
logarithm of the output measure in the figure, using data from
the
beginning of the sample to the fourth quarter of 2007, the
quarter
before the Great Recession began according to the NBER. I
extended the trend to the end of the sample. The difference
between the trend at the end of the sample and the (log of the)
last data point is 0.136, which I rounded to 0.10. The 10 percent
number reported in the text is the last number, multiplied by
100.
4 An early, subsequently discarded, view was the so-called
labor
mismatch hypothesis. It held that the low level of employment
was
not due to a lack of jobs, but to the lack of workers with the
right
skills to fill them. Workforce and firms were “mismatched.”
This view lost its appeal as it became apparent just how broad-
based the recession was. Employment and hours worked fell in
virtually all sectors. The unemployment rate jumped for
virtually
every type of worker, by level of education and occupation.
According to the mismatch hypothesis, wage growth should
have
been especially high and unemployment low for the highly
38. sought-
after types of workers. But jobs were scarce virtually
everywhere,
for everyone.
Why did employers hire so few workers? Since the early 1970s,
the National Federation of Independent Business has surveyed
its
members to find out what their top problem is. They are asked
to
select from among 10 possibilities, including taxes, inflation,
poor
sales and quality of labor. Under the mismatch hypothesis, a
large
fraction of firms should have selected “quality of labor” as their
top
problem. They didn’t. Instead, “poor sales” surged beyond all
other options as their top problem. Firms were not hiring simply
because people were not buying their goods and services.
5 It is an interesting story, beyond the scope of this analysis,
how
so much money came to be invested in mortgages. Under the
conventional view, the source of the money was what Bernanke
(2005) called the “savings glut”: Money poured in from high-
saving countries in Asia and oil-producing regions. Under what
Shin (2012) called the “banking glut,” a lot of that incoming
money
went to Europe and then came right back to the United States.
The European institutions that managed this back-and-forth
flow
had a strong preference for mortgages.
Evidence in favor of the notion that the large current account
deficit reflected an increase in the supply of funds by foreigners
is
39. the sharp drop in interest rates since 2000. The evidence that a
lot of the extra money went into mortgages is that mortgage
rates
and lending conditions became particularly loose. For further
discussion of this view, see Justiniano, Primiceri and
Tambalotti
1/22/2018 The Great Recession: A Macroeconomic Earthquake |
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
https://minneapolisfed.org/research/economic-policy-
papers/the-great-recession-a-macroeconomic-earthquake 7/8
(2015). Evidence consistent with the notion that the U.S.
current
account deficit played an important role in housing markets can
also be seen in the substantial covariation between U.S. housing
prices and the current account (see Figure 1.1 in Justiano,
Primiceri and Tambalotti 2015).
6 Technically, what happened was a rollover crisis, not a
traditional bank run like those familiar from movies and
photographs from the Great Depression. For a careful discussion
of a rollover crisis, see Gertler and Kiyotaki (2015).
7 The paradox-of-thrift argument described in the text lies at
the
heart of the analysis of the interest rate lower bound in
Eggertsson and Woodford (2003).
8 That shadow banking system was of a similar order of
magnitude as the traditional banking system discussed in
Geithner (2008).
40. 9 The IS-LM model—often depicted graphically and thought to
encapsulate traditional Keynesian theory—describes the
relationship between real output (GDP) and nominal interest
rates. On a graph with real interest rates on the vertical axis and
real GDP on the horizontal, IS-LM is seen as a downward-
sloping
IS curve (investment and savings, or the market for economic
goods) and an upward-sloping LM curve (liquidity preference
and
money supply). The intersection of these curves indicates an
economy’s equilibrium interest rate and GDP.
10 This is the idea that if people feel poor because the economy
is not prospering, they’ll cut back on spending; that cutback
will, in
turn, encourage businesses to retrench on investment and hiring,
leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy of economic downturn. The
“paradox” is that while thrift at the individual level may be
wise, it
can have a harmful impact on the broader economy and
ultimately
on individuals as well. See, for example, “Paradox” Redux in
the
June 2013 Region.
11 Businesses reducing investment when they experience lower
sales, for instance, or households cutting back because they feel
poor with the fall in house prices.
12 For another model that may also be able to come to terms
with
the data on the Great Recession, see Buera and Nicolini (2016).
References
Bernanke, Ben S. 2005. “The Global Saving Glut and the U.S.
41. Current Account Deficit.” Sandridge Lecture. Virginia
Association
of Economists, April 14.
Bernanke, Ben S. 2010. Statement before the Financial Crisis
Inquiry Commission. Washington, D.C., Sept. 2.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke
20100902a.pdf
Buera, Francisco and Juan Pablo Nicolini. 2016. “Liquidity
Traps
and Monetary Policy: Managing a Credit Crunch.” Unpublished
manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Christiano, Lawrence J., Martin S. Eichenbaum and Mathias
Trabandt. 2015. “Understanding the Great Recession.”
American
Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7 (1): 110-67.
https://minneapolisfed.org/publications/the-region/paradox-
redux
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke
20100902a.pdf
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 1/10
Like The Atlantic? Subscribe to The Atlantic Daily , our free
weekday email newsletter.
Email SIGN UP
42. Why are nearly 10 million people still out of work today? Was
it because in
September 2008, the U.S. government failed to bail out the
insolvent investment
bank Lehmann Brothers? Was it because the two U.S. housing
finance giants
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guaranteed too many mortgages
securitized by
It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession
It was how that debt was disproportionately distributed to
America’s most
economically fragile communities.
HEATHER BOUSHEY
MAY 21, 2014 | BUSINESS
Reuters
http://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/daily/
https://www.theatlantic.com/author/heather-boushey/
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 2/10
43. Lehman and other Wall Street firms to low-income borrowers in
the run up to the
housing and financial crises? Or does blame rest with the
Federal Reserve’s too-
easy-money policies in the wake of the brief dotcom recession
in the early 2000s?
Princeton University professor Atif Mian and University of
Chicago Booth School of
Business professor Amir Sufi pin the blame squarely on
policymakers, but not for
any of these three reasons, all of which are variously popular
with policymakers on
different sides of the political divide in Washington. Instead, in
their just-released
book, House of Debt, they argue that the Great Recession was
the result of a sharp
fall-off in consumption due to the unevenly accumulated
household debt in the first
six years of the 21st century. In that period, mortgage-credit
grew more than twice
as fast in neighborhoods with low credit scores than in
neighborhoods with high
credit scores, a marked departure from the experience of
previous decades. When
44. the housing bubble popped, the economic consequences were
sharply magnified by
the way debt was distributed across households and
communities.
How did this happen? Why did lenders suddenly shower less-
creditworthy
borrowers with trillions of dollars of credit? Mian and Sufi
demonstrate this was
enabled by the securitization of home mortgages by investment
banks that did not
seek federal guarantees from Fannie and Freddie—so called
private-label
securities, made possible by financial deregulation and the glut
of cash in world
markets in the wake of the Asian financial crisis of the late
1990s. That private-
label mortgage-backed securities were at the core of the housing
meltdown is no
longer in doubt, but what Mian and Sufi bring to the debate is
how an unequal
distribution of debt magnified the economic risks—based on
their path-breaking
microeconomic research—and a new framework for considering
who is to blame
45. among policymakers for the still reverberating debacle.
Unfortunately, the two authors don’t provide answers for why
so many households
took on so much debt, but they do paint a cautionary tale. This
is a critically
important contribution to the policy debate now raging over
what Congress and the
Obama administration should do in the way of reforms to the
housing-finance
industry. And, it’s important to our understanding of whether
and how inequality
http://www.amazon.com/House-Debt-Recession-Prevent-
Happening/dp/022608194X
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 3/10
affects economic growth and stability. What they demonstrate is
that as the U.S.
housing bubble burst and home prices began to fall in late 2006,
the unequal
distribution of debt amplified the decline in consumer spending
and the
46. consequence was an economic disaster. Mian and Sufi’s
research leads them to
conclude that the crisis was avoidable if only economists had
used the right
framework to see what was happening around them at the time.
“Economic disasters are man-made,” they write in the opening
pages, “and the
right framework can help us understand how to prevent them.”
By the end of the
book, the reader cannot but be left appalled at the sheer
enormity of the policy
failures. It’s not just that 7.4 million workers lost their job
during the years of the
Great Recession of 2007-2009 but also that the employment
crisis continues to
this day. While jobs are no longer being shed at the rate of
20,000 a day, the share
of the U.S. population with a job fell to a low of 58.2 percent in
November 2010
from a high of 63.4 percent in December 2006, but has only
increased by a fraction
of a percentage since then, hitting just 58.9 percent in April
2014.
47. Missing the housing bubble was a massive failure on the part of
policymakers. As a
result, our new normal is one where there are nearly 10 million
fewer people at
work. This book's contribution helps us understand the
important mechanisms
through which this occurred.
* * *
I watched the housing and financial crises unfold from my perch
as staff for the U.S.
Congressional Joint Economic Committee. By the time Lehman
Brothers failed, the
mantra on Capitol Hill had been articulated by former Treasury
Secretary Lawrence Summers, who said that any recovery
package had to be
“timely, targeted, and temporary.” But the stimulus that
emerged was not
specifically targeted at homeowners in foreclosure. If Mian and
Sufi are correct, the
biggest failure was—and continues to be—leaving families
struggling with
mortgages they cannot afford because of the fall in home prices.
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/05/20/did-the-
48. bank-bailout-do-enough-for-the-country
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 4/10
The federal government has provided assistance to a paltry
940,000 struggling
homeowners through the Homeowners Assistance Mortgage
Program, in a nation
where 5 million homes have been foreclosed on. This lack of
help hasn’t just hurt
those homeowners. Also caught in the downdraft are now
destroyed
neighborhoods, ruined communities, and thwarted lives of far
too many.
Protecting banks does not necessarily make the economy strong.
So, how did we get here? That’s the focus of House of Debt.
Mian and Sufi spent the
past decade compiling and analyzing microeconomic data to test
theories about
how the macroeconomy works. They conclude that inequality in
wealth and debt
combined with greater availability of credit to marginal
49. borrowers are a toxic
macro-economic combination. They call this the “levered
losses” view, arguing
that severe recessions occur when “asset prices collapse and
households sharply
pull back on spending,” even with “no obvious destruction of
productive capacity
occurs."
Their story starts with an accumulation of debt—lots of it. After
the Asian financial
crisis in 1997, investors were looking for safe havens to park
their money. What
they wanted were AAA-rated bonds. What they got were
mortgage-backed
securities that were rated AAA but turned out to be junk. As we
all now know—but
most of us didn’t know at the time—Wall Street firms in the
early 2000s began
slicing and dicing and then reassembling mortgage debt into
more and more exotic
and risky mortgage-backed securities in ways that made them
look risk-free.
If debt had been more equally distributed then the decline
in consumption would have been less dramatic and the
50. recession would have been less devastating.
But, it wasn’t just that there was more securitization. It was that
loans made to
riskier borrowers were more likely to be securitized. This both
drove the housing
bubble and made the consequences of it popping all the worse.
Mian and Sufi point
out that between 2002 and 2005, the growth in mortgage credit
and household
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 5/10
incomes became negatively correlated, that is, credit expanded
in areas where
incomes were declining. This makes no sense: How can you pay
back a loan if your
income is falling? They point to academic research by Yuliya
Demyanyk and Otto
Van Hemert showing the profound consequences: By 2006,
loans had become so
disconnected from prudent business practices that “an unusually
large fraction of
51. subprime mortgages originated in 2006 and 2007 [became]
delinquent or in
foreclosure only months later.”
As these foreclosures began to pile up, affected households cut
back sharply on
spending. Thus, the catalyst for Great Recession had begun two
years before the
dramatic demise of Lehman Brothers. In the second quarter of
2006, the collapse
in consumption started with residential investment, which fell
by a 17 percent
annual rate. Non-residential investment didn’t begin to fall until
late in 2008, but
by then households had already pared back spending sharply.
This fallout from the collapse of the housing bubble was
amplified by the unequal
distribution of net wealth. What Mian and Sufi find is that
counties with the largest
decline in total net worth—were the ones that cut back most on
spending when
house prices declined. As housing prices began falling in 2006,
in counties where
net worth had declined most, consumption fell by almost 20
52. percent, compared to
only five percent for the entire U.S. economy. In contrast, even
through 2008,
counties that avoided the collapse in net worth saw almost no
decline in spending.
If debt had been more equally distributed then the decline in
consumption would
have been less dramatic and the recession would have been less
devastating.
Mian and Sufi are part of a new generation of economists
who examine detailed microeconomic data to understand
the macroeconomy, giving us a deeper understanding of
how inequality affects growth and stability.
Further, they point out that you cannot have a foreclosure
crisis—or its associated
sharp fall-off in demand—without debt and the way that debt
grew during the early
2000s exacerbated the potential for a foreclosure crisis. Mian
and Sufi find that
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 6/10
53. about half of the rise in mortgage debt was among people who
lived in their homes,
not new purchasers. People took out home equity lines of credit
and used the cash
for home improvements, funds for their kids' college tuition, or
other types of
consumption. Once the crisis was in motion, about four-in-10
mortgage defaults
were among home-equity borrowers. Thus, the foreclosure crisis
was not due to
people reaching to buy homes, but to borrowing against their
primary asset. Had
they not ramped up borrowing, falling home prices would not
have affected
consumption or led to record-high foreclosures.
Finally, all this subprime mortgage debt that had been
structured into AAA-rated
mortgage-backed securities created financial instruments in
which no single
investor has the incentive or legal right to restructure the loan,
especially for loans
to low-net-worth borrowers. This led to a situation that
dramatically reduced the
capacity of homeowners to get relief in form or informal
54. backruptcy and increased
foreclosures. Foreclosures reduce prices more so than principal
reductions and thus
amplified the decline in home prices and the loss in wealth.
* * *
Given the troubling rise in economic inequality over the past
four decades, this
research could not be more timely. It’s not just the questions
they are asking and
the results they are finding, but also the methods they are using.
Mian and Sufi are
part of a new generation of economists who examine detailed
microeconomic data
and analysis to understand the macroeconomy, giving us a
deeper understanding
of how inequality affects economic growth and stability. They
have done this by
using detailed, microeconomic data at the county and zip-code
level to examine
debt and consumption patterns.
Mian and Sufi’s research shows that the marginal propensity to
consume—an
economics term that describes the amount of spending done
55. after receiving an
additional dollar—out of housing wealth depends not just on the
value of the asset
but also the debt burden, settling a near-century-old economic
debate between two
of the most prominent economists of the 20th century.
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 7/10
In The General Theory of Employment, Interests, and Money,
University of Cambridge
economist John Maynard Keynes argued in 1936 that the
distribution of income
mattered for the stability of the macroeconomy. Increased
spending, be it from
consumers, government, greater exports, or investment, will
multiply as it works its
way through the economy. If additional income goes into the
hands of those with a
high marginal propensity to consume then the multiplier for
consumption demand
56. will be relatively larger. But if additional income goes into the
hands of those with a
lower marginal propensity to consume then the multiplier on
consumption demand
will be relatively weaker.
Two decades later, University of Chicago economist Milton
Friedman
hypothesized that although rich households appear to consume
less, they have a
pretty clear sense of what their standard of living will be on
average year after year
and they adjust their savings to keep themselves at that level. In
good years, when
they get an income bonus, they will save a more while in bad
years, they won’t save
as much—or will borrow—to maintain that average standard of
living.
Yet neither Keynes nor Friedman had access to the kinds of data
now at the
fingertips of Mian and Sufi. Thus the Keynes-Friedman debate
was theoretical, not
grounded in empirical reality. Now, Mian and Sufi provide a
definite “yes” to the
question of whether we could have prevented the Great
57. Recession—and the
conclusion isn’t pretty. They argue that policymakers could
have seriously
mitigated the damage, pointing out that debt forgiveness would
have been much
more effective that the policies implemented because it would
have targeted
households with the largest marginal propensity to consume.
This is a failure on a
massive scale and more economists need to follow the lead of
Mian and Sufi and
look deep into the data to understand what we got wrong.
Mian and Sufi’s argument hinges on the conclusion that it was
the supply of credit
that drove the bubble and the heightened debt burdens, rather
than increased
demand from consumers. They discuss some reasons why people
may have wanted
to borrow more, such as the idea that people who expected
higher incomes were
borrowing constrained, but come down on the side that people
were just acting
58. 1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 8/10
irrationally—given that the massive increase in borrows during
the credit boom was
among borrowers with declining incomes, not those with rising
incomes. From this,
they conclude that “whatever the reason, however, consumers
who were offered
more money by lenders took it.”
Were people behaving irrationally? And, what (really) does that
mean? The late
1990s saw the strongest labor market in decades. The typical
male earner saw his
annual earnings finally grow, after over a decade-and-a-half of
inflation-adjusted
declines; women’s employment rates hit an all-time high of 58
percent; and the
typical family income grew by an average annual rate of just
under 2 percent. The
middle was (finally) back, so it may have been the case that
people were optimistic
that the recession of 2001 would not just be short and shallow,
59. but that the
recovery would look like the late 1990s.
But looking closely at the data reveals another pattern. One
thing that did not
happen during the recession of the early 2000s was a rise in
government
borrowing. The cash seeking a safe haven from the Asian
financial crisis had to go
somewhere, but the federal government wasn’t in the mood to
borrow. So those
dollars flowed willingly into the mortgage-backed securities
being peddled as AAA-
rated bonds. And the greater the demand, the more Wall Street
packaged up their
dodgy securities containing more and more subprime loans
extended to those least
able to afford credit.
The last few decades of the 2oth century also saw a number of
marked changes for
families. Women increased their labor supply steadily from the
1960s through the
high employment years of the early 1990s. By the late 1990s,
however, that long-
60. term rise in employment rates had stalled. The United States
went from being an
economy that had one of the largest shares of women in the
labor force to number
18 among 35 developed-economy member nations of the
Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development.
A variety of reasons have been presented for the sudden end in
the growth of
women’s employment beginning in the first decade of the 21st
century and
continuing today. The mainstream media play up the idea that
women are “opting
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 9/10
out” of careers in favor of motherhood, a story line developed
in large part by
journalists who either live in more wealthy neighborhoods and
thus see this
happening or write for publications that cater mostly to these
wealthy
61. neighborhoods. Yet empirical research finds that women, like
men, found it harder
to find and keep jobs due to the lackluster economic recovery
after the recession of
2001. As families sought to cope with the slow-job growth
economy in the 2000s
and a labor market that still does not provide the kinds of
supports and protections
working parents need, many turned to increasingly-readily-
available credit as a way
to cope.
Now, of course, such easy credit is no longer available. Neither
is a robust jobs
market. It may be true that it doesn’t matter why people took on
more debt prior to
the Great Recession, as Mian and Sufi contend, but today the
lessons learned then
are critically important. The story that emerged in the early
days of the Great
Recession was that too many people borrowed too much to
afford fancy houses.
That’s not what Mian and Sufi’s data show. They show that the
boom in debt
62. occurred among borrowers that couldn’t qualify for a
government-backed
mortgage. That the private sector sought them out in the tens of
millions to offer
loans they were demonstrably unable to repay—without worry
because these
lenders very quickly diced up those loans and sold them to
supposedly savvy
institutional investors—created the housing bubble that
exploded into the twin
crises that led to the Great Recession.
This activity produced a bubble—one that anyone could see and
one that
policymakers blithely passed off as either non-existent or
unimportant—to the
detriment of our entire economy. Subsequent reforms to our
financial system give
policymakers more tools to police housing finance, yet the
continuing over-reliance
on debt and a lack of good jobs leaves families at risk and
exposes our economy to
the whipsaw of another debt-fueled credit bubble. Mian and Sufi
deserve credit of
another kind for detailing how ensnared the American Dream is
63. in this tangled web
of debt finance—and how exposed the vast majority of us are to
the broader
economic consequences.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
1/22/2018 It Wasn't Household Debt That Caused the Great
Recession - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/house-of-
debt/371282/ 10/10
HEATHER BOUSHEY is the executive director and chief
economist at the Washington Center
for Equitable Growth.
https://www.theatlantic.com/author/heather-boushey/
http://equitablegrowth.org/
The topic will be Secular Stagnation. Details below:
Topic: Did the “Great Recession” Lead to Secular Stagnation
and How Should Policy Respond?
Your assignment is to write an essay that analyzes the debate
about secular stagnation in the aftermath of the Great Recession
and to recommend policies in a way that is consistent with your
diagnosis of the current situation. A complete assessment of the
secular stagnation debate requires an understanding of how the
economy got into this situation. Therefore, your essay should
discuss the sources of the Great Recession and explain why
some economists argue that the crisis led to secular stagnation.
Your analysis should cover different sides of the debate, but it
64. should lead to a clear statement of your own view about how the
stagnation concept does or does not apply to the current state of
U.S. economy. Based on this opinion, discuss the best path
forward for economic policy.
You need to consider the following concepts and questions:
· What was the source of the Great Recession and how did it
lead to the possibility of secular stagnation?
· Link your analysis of what has happened with the Classical
and Keynesian macroeconomic perspectives. Discuss how
aspects of these theories are (or are not) helpful in explaining
the relevant history. Also, your grade will be better if you can
build a somewhat nuanced story that demonstrates a deep
understanding of the theories.
· When discussing secular stagnation directly, I encourage you
to consider ways in which the recent recovery has been different
from what happened after earlier recessions.
· Link your policy recommendations in a consistent way to your
theoretical and empirical understanding of the secular
stagnation debate. Consider how both fiscal and monetary
policy could improve the U.S. economy over the next few years.
You should use the readings below to help guide your thinking
about the essay. You may use outside resources, but it is not
necessary to do outside research that goes beyond the readings.
The target length of the essay is 2,500 words (approximately 5
pages single spaced). Please use 12 point, Times New Roman
font.