Section 8 of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act provides that courts must refer parties to arbitration if there is a valid arbitration agreement and the subject matter of the dispute is covered by the agreement. The document analyzes key judicial interpretations of Section 8, including that it applies to civil disputes, the arbitration agreement's validity cannot be disputed, and courts may consider the arbitral tribunal's competence. While courts have allowed some exceptions, recent amendments to Section 8 aim to limit judicial intervention in arbitration. In conclusion, Section 8 continues to promote arbitration in domestic cases where an agreement exists.
LLB LAW NOTES ON CRIMINOLOGY AND PENOLOGY
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) [LLB -309] cpjcollege
Alternative Dispute Resolution has become the primary means by which cases are resolved now days, especially commercial, business disputes. It has emerged as the preferred method for resolving civil cases, with litigation as a last resort. Alternative Dispute Resolution provides an overview of the statutory, procedural, and case law underlining these processes and their interplay with litigation. A significant theme is the evolving role of
professional ethics for attorneys operating in non-adversarial settings. Clients and courts increasingly express a preference for attorneys who are skilled not only in litigation but in problem-solving, which costs the clients less in terms of time, money and relationship. The law of ADR also provides an introduction to negotiation and mediation theory.
Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...Legal
Scope of Interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Under which circumstances Court can interfere with an award passed by the arbitral tribunal.
State is important topic in Private International Law. It is very important for all law students world widely. It covers all he content of State.This PPT gives a detail information of the state in present time.
Detailed Analysis of Artcile 13 with relevant case laws and study of pre and post constitutional laws with reference to Doctrine of Eclipse and Severability. Doctrine of Waiver. Amenability of the Fundamental Rights.
Alternative dipsute resolution system is informal method of resolving conflicts. there are different modes of ADR viz., negotiations, mediation , conciliation and arbitration etc.
LLB LAW NOTES ON CRIMINOLOGY AND PENOLOGY
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) [LLB -309] cpjcollege
Alternative Dispute Resolution has become the primary means by which cases are resolved now days, especially commercial, business disputes. It has emerged as the preferred method for resolving civil cases, with litigation as a last resort. Alternative Dispute Resolution provides an overview of the statutory, procedural, and case law underlining these processes and their interplay with litigation. A significant theme is the evolving role of
professional ethics for attorneys operating in non-adversarial settings. Clients and courts increasingly express a preference for attorneys who are skilled not only in litigation but in problem-solving, which costs the clients less in terms of time, money and relationship. The law of ADR also provides an introduction to negotiation and mediation theory.
Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...Legal
Scope of Interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Under which circumstances Court can interfere with an award passed by the arbitral tribunal.
State is important topic in Private International Law. It is very important for all law students world widely. It covers all he content of State.This PPT gives a detail information of the state in present time.
Detailed Analysis of Artcile 13 with relevant case laws and study of pre and post constitutional laws with reference to Doctrine of Eclipse and Severability. Doctrine of Waiver. Amenability of the Fundamental Rights.
Alternative dipsute resolution system is informal method of resolving conflicts. there are different modes of ADR viz., negotiations, mediation , conciliation and arbitration etc.
What to Look out for while choosing Arbitration ahead of Regular Litigation.
Essentials of an Arbitration Agreement.
Arbitration Act | ad hoc |Institutional Arbitration |
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Afcons Judgment has interpreted Section 89 of CPC. In the said judgment Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down what the referral judge is supposed to do while referring the case for any Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). New Mediation Rules come into existance in the year 2015. Wherein also provisions for referral judges are made. This ppt will help Hon'ble Judges to refer cases for Mediation. This document also speaks about Lok Adalat, Conciliation, Arbitration and Judicial Settlement and intricacies involved therein.
Gearoid Carey is co-author (with Michael Collins SC) of the Irish Chapter of the ICCA Handbook on Commercial Arbitration. The handbook contains authoritative country reports prepared by leading arbitrators, academics and practitioners on national arbitral practice, as well as the relevant national legislation.
Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996Legal
Section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, jurisdiction, powers, court, local, international, judgments, supreme court, high court, powers, interim, time limit, amendment 2015
Stay of proceedings in favour of international commercial arbitration in Bang...Assaduzzaman Khan
ABSTRACT
This is a settled rule in international commercial arbitration where parties have agreed to resolve their
dispute through arbitration, there is inevitably the right and expectation to have any reference to the court to
have stayed in favour of arbitration. This rule, however, may not necessarily be the case in a jurisdiction that
is less exposed to arbitration practice. Settling disputes through arbitration in Bangladesh is not a new
method but this practice had been in place for many years and was previously governed by Arbitration Act
of 1940. After 1971 the same Act continued to be the applicable law in Bangladesh till the Arbitration Act
was enacted in 2001. When the Arbitration Act 2001 was enacted many expected a major change in the
court’s approach to dealing with a stay of proceedings in favour of Arbitration. Previously, upon the
applicant fulfilling certain conditions, the court had the discretion whether to grant stay proceedings.
However, under Arbitration Act 2001 granting the stay proceedings are now authorised upon the fulfillment
of certain conditions. This paper will discuss the provisions under the Arbitration Act 1940 in relation to
staying proceedings followed by examining the efficacy of stay proceeding in the Arbitration Act 2001.
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 Impact on law l...Singhania2015
In recent times there has been a rapid increase in commerce and industry which has led to parties resorting to arbitration to avoid delayed and protracted litigation. However, in India, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was failing to serve the purpose of alternate dispute resolution.
There is in India today a rising tide of expectancy that government, both federal and and state, are set to push through major initiatives for making changes in labour laws. There is a realisation that labour reforms have a key role to play in improving the ease of doing business in India.
An Indian Outline on Database ProtectionSinghania2015
One Business Processing Outsourcing company of India was in the eye of storm when one of its employees sold confidential financial information relating to customers of few British banks to an undercover reporter from the British tabloid ‘The Sun’. The incident sparked off a debate among the offshore industry circles, media and the legal world for the need of specific legislation for the protection for personal data in India which is absent currently.
India and Australia, popularly connected by 3C’s i.e. Curry, Commonwealth and Cricket, were ruled by British and inherited parliamentary system of governance. Both the countries have several commonalities, which serve as a foundation for closer cooperation and multi-faceted interaction, on lines similar to what India has developed with other western countries. Both countries are members of regional organizations including the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation and ASEAN Regional forum. The relationship has grown in strength and importance since India’s economic reforms in the nineties and has made rapid strides in all areas - trade, energy, mining, science & technology, information technology, education and defence
3rd Labour-Law-Primer for Multinational Companies in IndiaSinghania2015
With increasing trade relations between India and the World, cross-border movement of employees from and out of India has increased quite considerably. In India, employees enjoy the protection of diverse laws and regulations.
The business model of the companies is increasingly service centric and it is essential for employers to have the most efficient human resource and to grant them their legal rights and entitlements. However, in a country like India, the complex legal regime usually leave the employers facing typical issues related to interpretation of the large number of labour and employment laws governing the industry. These issues prove even more challenging when one of the parties involved is a foreign national.
Hence, this primer highlights the basic requirements of labour laws both from the perspective of Indian and foreign nationals employed in India. While throwing light on the appointment/ secondment of foreign nationals by Indian employers, the primer covers issues like taxation, working conditions, various social security benefits, issues related to termination of employees, importance and enforceability of non-solicitation clauses, retrenchment, various statutory registrations etc. With increasing concern for the security of female employees, employers have also been conferred with the duty to ensure protection against sexual harassment of women at the workplace.
Further, the primer also addresses the most common concern of all employers while entering into employment contracts, like the enforceability of clauses related to confidentiality, competition, poaching employees and soliciting clients. Keeping this in view, the primer would discuss the common controversies that arise from clauses in employment contracts and the caution that should be kept in mind in drafting an enforceable employment contract.
The key object is to enable the employers to familiarize themselves with the vast labour law regime of India.
Make in-India- An Overview of Defence-Manufacturing-in-IndiaSinghania2015
It is in strategic interest of a nation aspiring to be the regional power to develop
indigenous and internationally competitive defence industry base. Presently,
India is one of the largest importers of conventional defence equipment.
According to government statistics, roughly 60% of India’s defence
requirements are met through imports.
India has the potential to emerge as a global platform for defence research,
manufacturing, supply chain sourcing, software development, and offsets, which will strengthen our
defence capabilities and spur industrial development as well as exports in this sector.
Government is also carrying out reforms in defence procurement to increase efficiency, invite foreign
players with excellent capabilities and encourage domestic industry. It has introduced policies to
strengthen technology transfer, including liberalized FDI in defence production. The report of Committee
of Experts for Amendments to Defence Procurement Policy (DPP) 2013 is a progressive step in this
direction. Also, Make in India the new flagship program of Government of India has put a renewed
emphasis on creating a conducive policy environment for improving domestic defence manufacturing.
These radicle initiatives present opportunities for the foreign companies to enter India and local
companies to collaborate and design, develop and showcase their engineering strength. This will also
further India’s objective to create jobs, catalyze technology development, and transform India into a selfreliant
nation with export capabilities in defence sector. India’s existing wealth of talent, technology and
cost advantages together can help make defence products globally competitive.
India australia business report singhania & partners mar 2016Singhania2015
• India and Australia, popularly connected by 3C’s i.e. Curry, Commonwealth and Cricket, were ruled by British and inherited parliamentary system of governance. Both the countries have several commonalities, which serve as a foundation for closer cooperation and multi-faceted interaction, on lines similar to what India has developed with other western countries. Both countries are members of regional organizations including the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation and ASEAN Regional forum. The relationship has grown in strength and importance since India’s economic reforms in the nineties and has made rapid strides in all areas - trade, energy, mining, science & technology, information technology, education and defence .
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Section - 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, A Saving Beacon
1. Page 1
LEGAL
ALERT
Section 8 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996: A Saving Beacon
By: Madhu Sweta and Saurabh Bindal
he Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
(hereinafter the “1996 Act”) supplants the
Arbitration Act, 1940. In the 1996 Act,
intervention by Courts was limited so that the
object behind speedy justice could be well
achieved. To further the aforesaid objective, the
1996 Act harbours many provisions. Section 8 of
the 1996 Act denotes one such provision which
provides for limited judicial intervention and
furthers the objective by directing the parties to
get involved in arbitration on the basis of the
arbitration agreement. In domestic arbitrations ,
the uses of Section 8 applications in the Courts
have spiraled over the years. This piece provides
an indepth analysis of Section 8 of the 1996 Act by
focusing on the judicial precedents.
Section 8: The Golden Eagle:
A. Condition Precedent Stipulated under
Section 8
Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996 is peremptory in nature. It provides that a
judicial authority shall, on the basis of the
arbitration agreement between the parties, direct
the parties to go for arbitration. It also enlists
conditions precedent, which need fulfillment
before a reference can be made as per the terms of
the 1996 Act.1 In P. Anand Gajapathi Raju & Ors. v.
P.V.G. Raju (Died) & Ors2., while iterating the
1
See Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited and Anr. v. Verma
Transport Company, 2006 (7) SCC 275; see also Agri
Gold Exims Ltd. v. Sri Lakshmi Knits and Wovens and Ors.,
(2007) 3 SCC 686.
2 (2000)4SCC539.
periphery of Section 8 of the 1996 Act, the
Supreme Court said that “The conditions which are
required to be satisfied under Sub-sections (1) and
(2) of Section 8 before the Court can exercise its
powers are (1) there is an arbitration agreement;
(2) a party to the agreement brings an action in the
Court against the other party; (3) subject matter of
the action is the same as the subject matter of the
arbitration agreement; (4) the other party moves
the Court for referring the parties to arbitration
before it submits his first statement on the
substance of the dispute. …. The language of Section
8 is per-emptory.”
The following factors are to be considered before
entertaining an application under Section 8 of the
1996 Act:
First question to be analyzed is whether it can
be made applicable to a civil dispute. The
Supreme Court while answering the aforesaid
question in H. Srinivas Pai and Anr. v. H.V. Pai
(D) thr. L.Rs. and Ors.3, said that “The Act
applies to domestic arbitrations, international
commercial arbitrations and conciliations. The
applicability of the Act does not depend upon
the dispute being a commercial dispute.
Reference to arbitration and arbitability
depends upon the existence of an arbitration
agreement, and not upon the question whether
it is a civil dispute or commercial dispute. There
can be arbitration agreements in non-
commercial civil disputes also.”
3
(2010) 12 SCC 521.
T
2. Page 2
The presence of arbitration agreement is
another pre-requisite for seeking a reference
under Section 8.4 Section 7 of the 1996 Act
provides the diameter of the term “arbitration
agreement”. The importance of arbitration
agreement, for seeking a reference under
Section 8, was emphasized by the Supreme
Court in Smt. Kalpana Kothari v. Smt. Sudha
Yadav and ors.5 wherein the Court said that “As
long as the Arbitration clause exists, having
recourse to Civil Court for adjudication of
disputes envisaged to be resolved through
arbitral process or getting any orders of the
nature from Civil Court for appointment of
Receiver or prohibitory orders without evincing
any intention to have recourse to arbitration in
terms of the agreement may not arise.”
Next question which might arise in the step
wise analysis of Section 8 is whether the
validity of the arbitration clause can be
disputed before the Court, in front of which an
application for reference is made. The answer
to the question was laid in the negative by the
Supreme Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corpn.
4
See Atul Singh and Ors. v. Sunil Kumar Singh and Ors.,
(2008)2SCC602.
5
(2002)1SCC203.
Ltd. v. Pinkcity Midway
Petroleums6. The Court
in this case held that if
the existence of the
arbitration clause is
admitted, in view of the
mandatory language of
Section 8 of the Act, the
courts ought to refer
the dispute to
arbitration. The
Supreme Court, while
raising a presumption
for the validity of an
arbitration clause in an
agreement, in India Household and Healthcare
Ltd. v. LG Household and Healthcare Ltd.7, said
that the Courts would construe the agreement
in such a manner so as to uphold the
arbitration agreement.
Section 8 further mandates that the subject
matter of the dispute is the same as the subject
matter of the arbitration agreement. While
articulating on this pre-requisite, the Supreme
Court in Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Jayesh H.
Pandya and Anr.8, said that “The relevant
language used in Section 8 is-"in a matter which
is the subject matter of an arbitration
agreement". Court is required to refer the
parties to arbitration. Therefore, the suit should
be in respect of 'a matter' which the parties
have agreed to refer and which comes within
the ambit of arbitration agreement.”
An application under Section 8(1) cannot be
entertained unless accompanied by original
arbitration agreement or a certified copy
thereof. Laying emphasis on section 8(2) for
the grant of reference, the Supreme Court in
The Branch Manager, Magma Leasing and
Finance Limited and Anr. v. Potluri Madhavilata
6
(2003)6SCC503.
7
(2007)5SCC510.
8
(2003)5SCC531.
3. Page 3
and Anr.9 said that “An analysis of Section 8
would show that for its applicability, the
following conditions must be satisfied: (e) that
along with the application the other party
tenders the original arbitration agreement or
duly certified copy thereof.”
B. Implied Inclusion under Section 8
Though not implicit in the reading of Section 8 of
the Act, the Court in the case of Haryana Telecom
Ltd. v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.10 brought in
the competence of the arbitral tribunal as one of
the grounds for the grant of reference. The
proposition that Section 8, despite providing the
explicit grounds on which reference can be made,
also lays down the implicit ground of competence
of the Arbitral Tribunal, was also read in the
affirmative by the Court in the case of Booz Allen &
Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd. 11 wherein it
was held that where the cause/dispute is
inarbitrable, the court where a suit is pending, will
refuse to refer the parties to arbitration, under
Section 8 of the Act.
Effect of the Arbitration and Conciliation
(Amendment) Ordinance, 2015:
On 23rd October, 2015, the President promulgated
the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment)
Ordinance, 2015. The said Ordinance amended
Section 8 by stipulating that joinder of non-
signatories to an arbitration agreement was not
permissible. Further amendment to Section 8
requires that the judicial authority compulsorily
refer parties to arbitration irrespective of any
decision by the Supreme Court or any other court,
if the judicial authority finds that a valid
arbitration clause prima-facie exists. The
amendment essentially nullifies the judgment of
the Supreme Court in Booz Allen Hamilton v. SBI
9
(2009)10SCC103.
10
(1999) 5 SCC 688.
11
(2011) 5 SCC 53.
Home finance12, where it had ruled that serious
allegations of fraud are not arbitrable.
Conclusion:
Section 8 of the 1996 Act denotes a provision
which limits judicial intervention in the process of
arbitration. However, the judiciary has drawn
exception to the extent of intervention on the basis
of the arbitrability of the subject matter and the
competence of the arbitral tribunal to deal with it.
Though, the Amendment to Section 8 under the
Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment)
Ordinance, 2015 nullify the exceptions drawn by
the Judiciary, however, the effect of amendments
are still to be seen. This said, Section 8 of the 1996
Act still acts as a saving beacon for arbitration and
forms the basis for forcing the parties in cases of
domestic arbitrations to adopt the model of
arbitration where there exists an arbitration
agreement.
12
(2011) 5 SCC 53.
Madhu Sweta
Partner
madhu@singhania.in
Saurabh Bindal
Associate
saurabh@singhania.in