February 26 – March 1, 2024
Golden Valley Hotel, Cebu City
ORIENTATION WORKSHOP ON
THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF
THE MATATAG CURRICULUM TRAINING
FOR TEACHERS AND SCHOOL LEADERS
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF
LEARNING
Sarah Jane C. Atienza
EPS II, NEAP-QAD
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
07
09
08
06
Session 6:
M&E on Governance and
Management
Session 7:
M&E Learning Management
Session 8:
MATATAG M&E Data Consolidation and
Submission
Session 9:
M&E Reports for the
MATATAG Curriculum Training
Session 10:
R&R of M&E Officers and M&E
Focal (Coordinators) on MATATAG
Curriculum Training Implementation
SESSION
ROADMAP
10
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
4
Session Objective
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
• Understand the four levels of evaluation
in the Kirkpatrick Model: Reaction,
Learning, Behavior, and Results
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level 4
Results
THE KIRKPATRICK MODEL
Level 3
Behavior
The degree to which targeted outcomes
occur as a result of the training and
support and accountability package.
The degree to which participants apply
what they learned during training when
they are back on the job.
NEAP as an Academy/training institution/organization
for Learning, adapts the M&E principles focused on
learning based on Kirkpatrick’s Model
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level 2
Learning
Level 1
Reaction
The degree to which participants acquire
the intended knowledge, skills, attitude,
confidence, and commitment based on
their participation in the training.
The degree to which participants find the
training favorable, engaging, and relevant
to their jobs.
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Objectives
Level 4 – Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
Aligned on results
objectives
Level 3 – Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
Application
objectives
Level 2 – Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Terminal and
Enabling objectives
Level 1 – Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
Daily/Session
Objectives
What will be measured?
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Methods and tools
Level 4 – Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
Impact
Level 3 – Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
WAP
Level 2 – Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Pre and post
assessment
Level 1 – Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
End-of-the day
evaluation
What methods/tools will be used to collect data?
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Data Sources
Level 4 – Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
Level 3 – Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
WAP result
Level 2 – Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Pre and post
assessment result
Level 1 – Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
End-of-the day
evaluation result
Who and/or what documents will provide data or evidences on the
indicators?
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Schedule of M&E
Level 4 – Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
1 year or more than
Level 3 – Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
6 months or more
Level 2 – Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
End of the training
program
Level 1 – Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
End-of-the day
program
When will M&E activities be undertaken?
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Person Responsible
Level 4 – Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
Program Manager/ Top
Management
Level 3 – Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
Program Manager/
Immediate Supervisor/
M&E Officer
Level 2 – Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Program Manager/
M&E Coordinator
Level 1 – Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
Program Manager/
M&E Coordinator
Who will be accountable for ensuring that M&E activities are done?
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E Support Needed
Level 4 – Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and
support and accountability package)
Funding, assessment
form and tool
Level 3 – Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
Funding, assessment
form and tool
Level 2 – Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
Level 2 M&E, strong
internet connection,
laptop & mobile
phone
Level 1 – Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging,
and relevant to their jobs)
Level 1 M&E, strong
internet connection,
Laptop & Mobile
phone
What resources are needed to implement M&E activities?
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Level of M&E User of M&E Data
Level 4 – Results
(The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training
and support and accountability package)
School, Division,
Region, Deped CO
Level 3 – Behavior
(The degree to which participants apply what they learned during
training when they are back on the job.
PMT, DepEd –
NEAP, Division,
Region
Level 2 – Learning
(The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge,
skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their
participation in the training.
PMT (Program
Manager, M&E
Coordinator), DepEd -
NEAP
Level 1 – Reaction
(The degree to which participants find the training favorable,
engaging, and relevant to their jobs)
PMT (Program
Manager, M&E
Coordinator), DepEd -
NEAP
Who will use the data gathered?
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
Instructions:
1. Answer the pre-test that will be
used in the MATATAG Curriculum
Training.
2. DO NOT SCREENSHOT/TAKE A
PHOTO, SHARE THE PRETEST, POST IT
IN ANY SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM.
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
https://bit.ly/MEPRETEST
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division
https://bit.ly/EODEvalSample
NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division

SD_Monitoring and Evaluation Learning.pdf

  • 1.
    February 26 –March 1, 2024 Golden Valley Hotel, Cebu City ORIENTATION WORKSHOP ON THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE MATATAG CURRICULUM TRAINING FOR TEACHERS AND SCHOOL LEADERS
  • 2.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF LEARNING Sarah Jane C. Atienza EPS II, NEAP-QAD
  • 3.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division 07 09 08 06 Session 6: M&E on Governance and Management Session 7: M&E Learning Management Session 8: MATATAG M&E Data Consolidation and Submission Session 9: M&E Reports for the MATATAG Curriculum Training Session 10: R&R of M&E Officers and M&E Focal (Coordinators) on MATATAG Curriculum Training Implementation SESSION ROADMAP 10
  • 4.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division 4 Session Objective NEAP-CO Quality Assurance and Monitoring & Evaluation Division • Understand the four levels of evaluation in the Kirkpatrick Model: Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results
  • 5.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level 4 Results THE KIRKPATRICK MODEL Level 3 Behavior The degree to which targeted outcomes occur as a result of the training and support and accountability package. The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job. NEAP as an Academy/training institution/organization for Learning, adapts the M&E principles focused on learning based on Kirkpatrick’s Model
  • 6.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level 2 Learning Level 1 Reaction The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in the training. The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs.
  • 7.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division
  • 8.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level of M&E Objectives Level 4 – Results (The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and support and accountability package) Aligned on results objectives Level 3 – Behavior (The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job. Application objectives Level 2 – Learning (The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in the training. Terminal and Enabling objectives Level 1 – Reaction (The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs) Daily/Session Objectives What will be measured?
  • 9.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level of M&E Methods and tools Level 4 – Results (The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and support and accountability package) Impact Level 3 – Behavior (The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job. WAP Level 2 – Learning (The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in the training. Pre and post assessment Level 1 – Reaction (The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs) End-of-the day evaluation What methods/tools will be used to collect data?
  • 10.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level of M&E Data Sources Level 4 – Results (The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and support and accountability package) Level 3 – Behavior (The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job. WAP result Level 2 – Learning (The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in the training. Pre and post assessment result Level 1 – Reaction (The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs) End-of-the day evaluation result Who and/or what documents will provide data or evidences on the indicators?
  • 11.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level of M&E Schedule of M&E Level 4 – Results (The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and support and accountability package) 1 year or more than Level 3 – Behavior (The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job. 6 months or more Level 2 – Learning (The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in the training. End of the training program Level 1 – Reaction (The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs) End-of-the day program When will M&E activities be undertaken?
  • 12.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level of M&E Person Responsible Level 4 – Results (The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and support and accountability package) Program Manager/ Top Management Level 3 – Behavior (The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job. Program Manager/ Immediate Supervisor/ M&E Officer Level 2 – Learning (The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in the training. Program Manager/ M&E Coordinator Level 1 – Reaction (The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs) Program Manager/ M&E Coordinator Who will be accountable for ensuring that M&E activities are done?
  • 13.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level of M&E Support Needed Level 4 – Results (The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and support and accountability package) Funding, assessment form and tool Level 3 – Behavior (The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job. Funding, assessment form and tool Level 2 – Learning (The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in the training. Level 2 M&E, strong internet connection, laptop & mobile phone Level 1 – Reaction (The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs) Level 1 M&E, strong internet connection, Laptop & Mobile phone What resources are needed to implement M&E activities?
  • 14.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Level of M&E User of M&E Data Level 4 – Results (The degree to which targeted outcomes as a result of the training and support and accountability package) School, Division, Region, Deped CO Level 3 – Behavior (The degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job. PMT, DepEd – NEAP, Division, Region Level 2 – Learning (The degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and commitment based on their participation in the training. PMT (Program Manager, M&E Coordinator), DepEd - NEAP Level 1 – Reaction (The degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs) PMT (Program Manager, M&E Coordinator), DepEd - NEAP Who will use the data gathered?
  • 15.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division Instructions: 1. Answer the pre-test that will be used in the MATATAG Curriculum Training. 2. DO NOT SCREENSHOT/TAKE A PHOTO, SHARE THE PRETEST, POST IT IN ANY SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM.
  • 16.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division https://bit.ly/MEPRETEST
  • 17.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division https://bit.ly/EODEvalSample
  • 18.
    NEAP-CO Quality Assuranceand Monitoring & Evaluation Division