Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Schools, families, and communities week one
1. W E E K O N E
S U M M E R 2 0 1 5
A M Y G A R R E T T D I K K E R S , P H . D .
Schools, Families, and
Communities
No audio on this slide
2. The Core Argument
“Without partnerships, educators segment students
into the school child and the home child, ignoring
the whole child. This parceling reduces or eliminates
guidance, support, and encouragement for children’s
learning from parents, relatives, neighbors, peers,
business partners, religious leaders, and other adults
in the community (Epstein, p.5).”
4. A brief interlude
School does not have to equal a K-12 building
Virtual schools
Higher education institutions (universities, colleges,
community colleges)
Other educational settings
Family does not have to equal parents
Other relatives
Children, spouses, extended families
Friends or other immediate stakeholders in the lives of our
clients
Community does not have to equal an organization
5. Facts/Actions Needed
Importance of families
Teacher and administrator contact
Few teachers or administrators have preparation
necessary to work with families
Well-designed programs and practices benefit all
Research and evaluations are needed
We CAN implement effective, engaging programs
that lead to the success of students
We MUST change pre-service and in-service
education
8. School, family, and community partnership
Principles
NOT parental involvement
Multidimensional (six types of involvement – p.46)
Essential component of school and classroom
organization
Require multilevel leadership
Must include a focus on increasing student learning
and development
Equity at the core
Methods of research must continue to improve
10. U s e Y O U R c o n t e x t f o r y o u r r e s p o n s e s .
I f y o u a r e h i g h e r e d , t a l k a b o u t h i g h e r e d .
I f y o u a r e a t a d i s t r i c t l e v e l , t a l k a b o u t t h e n e e d s o f a d i s t r i c t .
B U T a l s o r e a c h o u t s i d e o f y o u r c o n t e x t .
T h i n k o u t s i d e o f t h e c l a s s r o o m . T h i n k o u t s i d e o f S t u d e n t
A f f a i r s . T h i n k o u t s i d e o f t h e d i s t r i c t o f f i c e . T h i n k o u t s i d e o f
y o u r c o m m u n i t y o r g a n i z a t i o n .
One more thing before I go
Editor's Notes
External Structure of the Model: overlapping spheres of influence of family, school, and community on children’s learning and development
Inner Structure of the Model: interactions that occur between and among the people in the major contexts as individuals and in groups
External: Think of one activity that you think belongs in the nonoverlapping sections – one that is exclusive to family, exclusive to school, exclusive to community.
Think of one activity that you would place in the overlapping sections – shared b/w school and family; b/w family and community; etc.
Internal: Connection between parent and a teacher (positive example and negative example); Connection between all families and all teachers and staff at School (positive example and negative example)
What intersection of the spheres of influence interests you?
Question: How might overlapping spheres of influence of home, school, and community create less efficient but more effective organizations than are created by separate spheres of influence?
Question: Which organizational feature – efficiency or effectiveness – would you choose for a school attended by your child, and why? When might you trade one for the other?
Question: How can boundaries between and among schools, families, and communities be fixed and rigid or flexible and permeable? What different effects might permeable and impenetrable home-school-community boundaries have on student attitudes, behavior, and learning?
Question: What statements or actions have you heard or seen that showed that parents were operating within a model of separate spheres of influence or within a model of overlapping spheres of influence?
Question: What statements or actions have you heard or seen that showed that teachers were operating within a model of separate spheres of influence or within a model of overlapping spheres of influence?
How can these theories influence the work that we do in schools and communities? Keep them in mind throughout the rest of the semester.