SlideShare a Scribd company logo
© 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved.
www.sagaciousresearch.com
India has experienced enormous economic growth over the past two decades due to the
economic reforms that opened India‟s markets to global investors. During this time,
India has worked hard to balance the rights of patent holders and meet the needs of its
socio-economically backward population. But from time to time; India has faced severe
criticism from other nations like US for not abiding the patent laws. The Supreme Court
ruling of April denying US multinational Novartis‟ request to retain the patent on a
cancer drug was disliked by America‟s corporate and they alleged India as a Nation
extremely hostile towards patent laws. Indian ambassador to the US, Nirupama Rao,
thus intervened in the matter and assured US that this is hardly evidence of a climate
hostile to either innovation or US-based companies.
Indian Patent Office issued more than 4000 patents from 2005 to 2011 for
pharmaceutical inventions. Of those granted, 20-30% was awarded to US-based
companies each year.
Citing this case, she explained that Indian court ruling only reinforced the premium that
should be placed on actually novel patents, strengthening, not weakening, the sanctity
of patent laws. Besides this, in past six decades, India has issued one compulsory license
on a compound pharmaceutical not to weaken but only strengthen the patent laws.
To further assert India‟s commitment to enhance India-US strategic partnership as they
cooperate on health care, disease control and prevention, she added that Indian
Intellectual property laws passed over past forty years have extensively protected
patents and trademarks. The amendments to Patents Act of 1970 in 1999, 2002 and
2005, is exemplary in the developing world. Also, India is committed to comply with
international treaties such as the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)
agreement of the World Trade Organization.
S A G A C I O U S
U P D A T E S
Sagacious Welcomes New
Batch of 1o Techn0-Legal
Patent Analysts In Its
Team
Sagacious Research recently
hired 10 Patent Analysts in
multiple domains. These
analysts come from renowned
colleges like BITs- Pilani,
National Institute of Technology,
IIIT & IP-University. With this,
Sagacious Research is now
having a team of over 70 techno-
legal experts divided in multiple
teams.
India’s Assurance to US
– Patent Laws Are
Complied
“The Patents Act of 1970,
amended in 1999, 2002 and 2005,
is considered a model in the
developing world. Critics who say
otherwise are simply wrong.”-
Nirupama Rao
Vol- 1, Date: 23rd August, 2013
G E N E R A L N E W S
Follow Us at:
We Believe in Building
Trust…
© 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved.
www.sagaciousresearch.com
The data sourced from the Office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, India reveals that on August 13, 2013, 1,
58,449 patent applications, where requests for examination have been filed, are pending in India. Delhi has maximum number (57,385) of
pending patent applications and is closely followed by Chennai (52,891), Kolkata (29,223) and Mumbai (18,950).
Government has blamed the shortage of patent examiners and substantive increase in filing of patent applications in India for this dismal
scenario. Government also claims that it has completed the process of selection of 248 patent examiners. But, the fact is that its close
competitor China has recently updated its patent system while India has not taken any concrete move in this direction.
It is a fact that the grant of patents is a quasi-judicial process and is inherently time-consuming as it involves execution of a process
including several steps such as filing of requests for examination, examination of the application, publication of the application, and
disposal of filed pre-grant oppositions. Already, India has been constantly facing severe criticism from the side of US Pharmaceutical
multinationals and US Govt. for having harsh patent laws and not working towards creating a favorable IP environment. So, if urgent
counter-measures are not taken, it will adversely impact the image of Indian patent system on the global scale.
U.S. consumer electronics giant filed 259 invention patent applications and 132 design patent applications outshining all other foreign
countries. Samsung, its most powerful competitor stands second in terms of design patent applications and ranks 16th among foreign
applicants in the invention patent category.
Earlier Apple did not file many patents in Taiwan. But taking heed of the mounting competition in the smartphone market in recent
past, Apple made a conscious decision to follow the aggressive approach of Taiwanese smartphone maker HTC Corp. and began
seeking more protection for its Intellectual Property. In a bid to outshine its competitors like HTC and Samsung, Apple filed 65 times
more design patent applications and almost equal number of invention patent applications in 2013. In contrast, only 124 invention
patent applications and 32 design patent applications were filed by HTC while Samsung Electronics Co. filed 93 smartphone-related
patent applications and 85 design patent applications in this six-month period.
Filings on Rise but 1.58L Patent Applications Remain Pending in
India
Delhi has 57385, followed closely by Chennai 52891, Kolkata 29223 & Mumbai 18950
It is high time that Indian Government realize that patent system of country plays a
vital role in strengthening the economy and a favorable IP environment brings in
more FDI. As such, every country across the globe is committed to update and
strengthen its patent system while India is still lagging behind.
In already grim Indian IP environment, a recent and shocking revelation that around
1.58 lakh patent applications are awaiting examination in all the Indian Patent Offices
spread across Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata and Mumbai comes as a big blow.
The written reply of Minister of State for Commerce and Industry, EM Sudarsana
Natchiappan, to the Parliament of India has revealed a grim picture at Indian Patent
Offices.
IPO Statistics Revelation- Apple Tops Foreign Patent Filings in
Taiwan
U.S. consumer electronics giant filed 259 invention patent applications and 132 design patent
applications.
In the recent report of Intellectual Property Office (IPO) for the January-June period
of 2013, Apple Inc. has conquered the top slot for foreign patent filings in Taiwan.
IPO‟s statistics report for the first half of this year has recently released. It reports
that Apple has filed maximum patents in both patent application categories for the
very first time in Taiwan.
© 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved.
www.sagaciousresearch.com
A gazing log will be made accessible to users by Google which will track the identified items viewed by them and exactly tell what they
were looking at for a specified amount of time.
What comes as a great relief is that this method would not tell what you looked at, but only that for how long you looked at it. Then,
Google will be able to charge advertisers based on time a user spent looking at, say an advertisement, in some Google application.
The whole idea is genuinely interesting though the practical implementation and feasibility of this method remains questionable until
Google implements it in the public domain.
The oldest Jobs-contributed patent application dates back to Sept. 26, 2002, and the most recent was filed a year after Steve Jobs died.
Many of these are yet to be reviewed and it‟s impossible to tell when and which patent will be Steve Jobs‟ last.
STOP STARING!
GOOGLE’s creepiest patent is watching you.
A crazy and weird patent has been filed by Google in the area of wearable technology. A
method has been developed by Google to exactly tell what users are gazing at and for how long.
In their patent filing, an explanation of this method is given which uses a front facing camera
and a camera that tracks eye movement.
In this method, a gaze tracking technique is implemented that uses a head mounted gaze
tracking device communicating with a server. The server receives scene images from the
tracking device which captures external scenes viewed by a user wearing it and also receives
gaze direction information. This information indicates where exactly the user was gazing while
viewing the external scenes. An image recognition algorithm is executed on the scene images to
identify items within the external scenes viewed by the user.
T E C H N O L O G Y
Steve Jobs Still Earning Patent
USPTO has recently granted a design patent in his name. This design patent is for an
ornamental building panel for a store
USPTO records have revealed some incredible information about the
Intellectual Property in name of legendary Steve Jobs.
Steve Jobs is still earning patents in his name and USPTO has recently
granted a design patent in his name. This design patent is for an ornamental
building panel for a store. The first patent granted in his name, in contrast,
was for an ornamental design of a computer.
Steve was a legendary inventor and majority of his patents are design patents
only. As per USPTO records, Steve Jobs name appears on 402 patents of
Apple as inventor.
© 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved.
www.sagaciousresearch.com
title of ruling head in the world of digital communication devices. The plot of their war revolves much around the story of Pacific Rim,
where the aliens unlock their bio weapons Kaijus to conquer the Earth and the human join hands to create Jaegers, oversized
humanoids piloted by two humans whose brains are connected to each other by neural bridges. Kaijus, the colossal monsters make
multiple attempts in various parts of the world to destroy the humanoids, the establishments made by the human kind but on their way
stood these gigantic humanoids, invented specially to protect the human race from the constant and repetitive conquests made by
Kaijus.
Similarly, the US tech giant Apple and the Korean tech giant Samsung seem to be in a constant war to accrue larger market share, larger
share of profits and to pull each other‟s products off the market shelves.
The saga began in April 2011, when Apple accused Samsung for copying design of the hardware and software features like double-tap
zooming. Samsung counter-sued Cupertino-based Apple for infringing on its software patents. Samsung was found guilty of the
infringements by courts of law and thus Apple was awarded with over $ 1billion for the damages, this was later on reduced to just over
$450 billion as the jury was found to have committed an error in determining the damages.
In June 2011, Samsung alleged that iPhone4 and iPad2 violated patents of the Korean company. The International Trade Commission
happened to favor Samsung by imposing a ban on the sale of Apple phones in US jurisdiction. Just a week after Samsung sued Apple in
the ITC court, Apple filed a suit against Samsung citing several patent infringements on the hardware designs on the iPhone. Continuing
the battle, Apple filed another law suit in California district accusing Samsung of infringing on utility patents in Samsung‟s new
products. Samsung reverted back stating that “all generations” of iPhone & iPad infringe on its own patents. By this time the war had
already reached the peak, but, Apple kept on adding new Samsung products to the list as and when they were launched in the market.
Just as we see intense use of nuclear warheads and machine in the movie, in this tech giant‟s war we witness persuasive arguments
between lobbyists, policymakers, media, trade officials and government agencies. Although the giant machines, fireworks, flames VFX
effects in the smartphone war of Apple and Samsung is missing but the war between lawyers in multiple courts across the oceans and
both the giants claiming for settlement of multi-billion dollars for the damages look no different from an intense war scene from Pacific
Rim.
Redefining Apple & Samsung Patent Disputes in Hollywood
Movie, “Pacific Rim” Style
USPTO has recently granted a design patent in his name. This design patent is for an
ornamental building panel for a store
Apple & Samsung smartphone battle is the most popular patents
infringement tussles till date that has left no leaf unturned with respect to
smartphone aesthetics. Be it software or the hardware, both Apple and
Samsung have spilled law suits over each other worth multi billion dollars in
multiple regions and for multiple attributes.
The Samsung and Apple patent war in smartphone domain seems just like a
war between gigantic Karjus and Jaegars of Pacific Rim, who are fighting for
their pride, safeguarding their business and future interests so as to attain the
© 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved.
www.sagaciousresearch.com
Currently no approved bio-similars of Herceptin are available in India though two Indian firms are working on its generic equivalents.
Time and again, western drug manufacturers in India have been accused of greedy pricing. As far as Herceptin is concerned, it has been
Roche‟s third-biggest seller notching global revenues of 3.08 billion Swiss francs just in the first half of 2013.
Amidst all these accusations, Roche decided not to pursue the patent and held the general intellectual property (IP) environment in
India accountable for their decision. However, Roche‟s Herceptin would remain on sale in India as its global patents expire in 2019.
Roche stated that India‟s patent laws are quite harsh compared to other countries as India attempts to make vital medications
affordable to its enormous poor population. This, probably, is also the biggest reason behind on-going intellectual property battles of
Western drug-makers in India.
More than a million women in India suffer from aggressive HE2+ breast cancer since this patent has been in force (from 2006) and less
than 10% of them were able to get access to Herceptin. Consequently India‟s Cancer Patients‟ Aid Association have challenged this
patent arguing that a drug whose single dose costs Rs. 6-8 lakhs is excessively priced for a country like India. Till now, Roche had not
disclosed its price for Trastuzumab in India, sold under the brand name Herceptin. Herceptin is an extremely efficient drug for the
treatment of breast cancer. It can be administered alone, along with chemotherapy and after surgery. It even helps to avoid surgery, in
many cases.
L I F E S C I E N C E S
Patent Granted for a “Death Test Device” to Two Lancaster University
Professors
“Death test device” can analyze tiny endothelial cells inside the ¬capillaries to determine the
aging pace of one’s body.
Two Physics professors at Lancaster University have come up with a revolutionary
invention. Aneta Stefanovska and Peter McClintock have patented a “death test device”
that can analyze tiny endothelial cells inside the ¬capillaries to determine the aging pace
of one‟s body.
The device, which is expected to be out in a wrist watch-style, will use a painless laser
beam to examine the cell functionality and estimate how long a person will live. The
estimation will be given grades from 0 to 100 (Grade 0 meaning death and 100 meaning
optimum function). The beam can also be used to test for diseases like cancer and
dementia.
They will also create a database where data of every person could be maintained and
used as reference against others to predict years left with someone before he will die.
The device is expected to be available to doctors within three years.
Roche not to pursue Indian patent for breast-cancer drug,
Herceptin
USPTO has recently granted a design patent in his name. This design patent is for
an ornamental building panel for a store
In earlier this year, Indian health ministry committee had urged the
Government of India to issue a “compulsory license” that would pave way
for a licensing agreement between Swiss drug-maker „Roche‟ and some
indigenous drug manufacturer of India and facilitate manufacturing of
cheaper generic version of its top-selling breast cancer drug, “Herceptin”.
© 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved.
www.sagaciousresearch.com
Roche‟s generosity to give up the Herceptin patent is a welcome move. However, to solve the accessibility issue of such an important
life-saving drug, there is an urgent need of pro-active support of Government to the pharmaceutical sector to find the breakthrough bio-
equivalent of Herceptin.
A B O U T S A G A C I O U S
Sagacious Research is ISO Certified India based
Global Patent & IP advisory and analytic firm
offering cost effective & multi-lingual Patent
Searching, Patent Licensing Support, Patent Alerts &
Watches, Patent Drafting Support Services in over
100 countries and in over 16 Asian/European
languages.
An ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 27001:2005
Certified Company
70+ Techno-legal Experts | 16+ Languages |
100 Countries | 5, 000+ Projects | 100%
Returning Clients
C O N T A C T S A G A C I O U S R E S E A R C H
Germany
Kathrin Reinhardt
+49 6107 6383 396
United Kingdom
Aarti Thakral
+44 (0) 203287 5098
Rest of Europe
Raphael Joseph
+353 125 49910
Australia
Steve Johnson
+61 3 9028 4017
United States
6387 Fairways Drive
Longmont, CO-80503
T: (303) 506-4192
F: (803) 831-1899
India (HQ)
303-B, Enkay Town Plaza, Block-I, Palam Vihar,
Gurgaon-122017, Delhi/NCR, India
T: +91 124 4033431
F: +91 11 43850700
Web:
info@sagaciousresearch.com
www.sagaciousresearch.com

More Related Content

What's hot

Impact of ipr in biological research in india
Impact of ipr in biological research in indiaImpact of ipr in biological research in india
Impact of ipr in biological research in india
Swaraj Prasad
 
Using IP to win over your angels: 10 things every start-up must know
Using IP to win over your angels: 10 things every start-up must knowUsing IP to win over your angels: 10 things every start-up must know
Using IP to win over your angels: 10 things every start-up must know
European Innovation Academy
 
Patentable and Non Patentable Inventions
Patentable and Non Patentable InventionsPatentable and Non Patentable Inventions
Patentable and Non Patentable Inventions
egoistic_ek
 
The Basics of Intellectual Property Management
The Basics of Intellectual Property ManagementThe Basics of Intellectual Property Management
The Basics of Intellectual Property Management
MaRS Discovery District
 
Patents and covid innovations
Patents  and covid innovationsPatents  and covid innovations
Patents and covid innovations
Indian Innovators Association
 
IP Strategies for Startups
IP Strategies for StartupsIP Strategies for Startups
IP Strategies for Startups
Sanjay Agrawal
 
Drafting chemical patent specs and claims
Drafting chemical patent specs and claimsDrafting chemical patent specs and claims
Drafting chemical patent specs and claims
Caezar Angelito E Arceo
 
Intellectual Property Rights
Intellectual Property RightsIntellectual Property Rights
Intellectual Property Rights
Dr INBAMALAR T M
 
Federal Circuit Review | February 2013
Federal Circuit Review | February 2013Federal Circuit Review | February 2013
Federal Circuit Review | February 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Caezar Angelito E Arceo
 
Cs207 7
Cs207 7Cs207 7
Global innovations for local entrepreneurs
Global innovations for local entrepreneursGlobal innovations for local entrepreneurs
Global innovations for local entrepreneurs
Indian Innovators Association
 
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
Thomas O. Dubuisson
 
Knobbe Martens and Forresters Seminar
Knobbe Martens and Forresters SeminarKnobbe Martens and Forresters Seminar
Knobbe Martens and Forresters Seminar
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
ITC Litigation
ITC Litigation ITC Litigation
ITC Litigation
Rachel Hamilton
 
Leage For Programming Freedom. Against Software Patents. (1991)
Leage For Programming Freedom. Against Software Patents. (1991)Leage For Programming Freedom. Against Software Patents. (1991)
Leage For Programming Freedom. Against Software Patents. (1991)
guest757c2c1
 
Patents for startups- why and what?
Patents for startups- why and what?Patents for startups- why and what?
Patents for startups- why and what?Inolyst
 
Protecting and profiting from your intellectual property_Carter DeLuca for mH...
Protecting and profiting from your intellectual property_Carter DeLuca for mH...Protecting and profiting from your intellectual property_Carter DeLuca for mH...
Protecting and profiting from your intellectual property_Carter DeLuca for mH...
Levi Shapiro
 
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent LitigationThe Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 

What's hot (19)

Impact of ipr in biological research in india
Impact of ipr in biological research in indiaImpact of ipr in biological research in india
Impact of ipr in biological research in india
 
Using IP to win over your angels: 10 things every start-up must know
Using IP to win over your angels: 10 things every start-up must knowUsing IP to win over your angels: 10 things every start-up must know
Using IP to win over your angels: 10 things every start-up must know
 
Patentable and Non Patentable Inventions
Patentable and Non Patentable InventionsPatentable and Non Patentable Inventions
Patentable and Non Patentable Inventions
 
The Basics of Intellectual Property Management
The Basics of Intellectual Property ManagementThe Basics of Intellectual Property Management
The Basics of Intellectual Property Management
 
Patents and covid innovations
Patents  and covid innovationsPatents  and covid innovations
Patents and covid innovations
 
IP Strategies for Startups
IP Strategies for StartupsIP Strategies for Startups
IP Strategies for Startups
 
Drafting chemical patent specs and claims
Drafting chemical patent specs and claimsDrafting chemical patent specs and claims
Drafting chemical patent specs and claims
 
Intellectual Property Rights
Intellectual Property RightsIntellectual Property Rights
Intellectual Property Rights
 
Federal Circuit Review | February 2013
Federal Circuit Review | February 2013Federal Circuit Review | February 2013
Federal Circuit Review | February 2013
 
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
Crash course on claim drafting (with exercises)
 
Cs207 7
Cs207 7Cs207 7
Cs207 7
 
Global innovations for local entrepreneurs
Global innovations for local entrepreneursGlobal innovations for local entrepreneurs
Global innovations for local entrepreneurs
 
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
What Startups Should Do To Protect Their Big Mobile Application Idea? The Imp...
 
Knobbe Martens and Forresters Seminar
Knobbe Martens and Forresters SeminarKnobbe Martens and Forresters Seminar
Knobbe Martens and Forresters Seminar
 
ITC Litigation
ITC Litigation ITC Litigation
ITC Litigation
 
Leage For Programming Freedom. Against Software Patents. (1991)
Leage For Programming Freedom. Against Software Patents. (1991)Leage For Programming Freedom. Against Software Patents. (1991)
Leage For Programming Freedom. Against Software Patents. (1991)
 
Patents for startups- why and what?
Patents for startups- why and what?Patents for startups- why and what?
Patents for startups- why and what?
 
Protecting and profiting from your intellectual property_Carter DeLuca for mH...
Protecting and profiting from your intellectual property_Carter DeLuca for mH...Protecting and profiting from your intellectual property_Carter DeLuca for mH...
Protecting and profiting from your intellectual property_Carter DeLuca for mH...
 
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent LitigationThe Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
 

Viewers also liked

Our Approach to Coaching
Our Approach to CoachingOur Approach to Coaching
Our Approach to Coaching
stokesjolly
 
Presentación croacia 37 fotos
Presentación croacia 37 fotosPresentación croacia 37 fotos
Presentación croacia 37 fotosanamariacovacich
 
Kinesiology Citation Analysis Lightning Talk
Kinesiology Citation Analysis Lightning TalkKinesiology Citation Analysis Lightning Talk
Kinesiology Citation Analysis Lightning Talk
lydiahowes
 
Visual resume/giulia.buranello
Visual resume/giulia.buranelloVisual resume/giulia.buranello
Visual resume/giulia.buranellogiuliaburanello
 
Presentation data inilam
Presentation data inilamPresentation data inilam
Presentation data inilamYusazri Yusof
 
Poema 090616203155-phpapp01
Poema 090616203155-phpapp01Poema 090616203155-phpapp01
Poema 090616203155-phpapp01Jahidith Cabrera
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentationmarinaalg
 
PRESENTATION [US - ENG]
PRESENTATION [US - ENG]PRESENTATION [US - ENG]
PRESENTATION [US - ENG]marinaalg
 
DUI Sentencing in Illinois
DUI Sentencing in IllinoisDUI Sentencing in Illinois
DUI Sentencing in Illinois
Peter Stumpf
 
Drops de Jogos's media kit of 2015
Drops de Jogos's media kit of 2015Drops de Jogos's media kit of 2015
Drops de Jogos's media kit of 2015
Pedro Zambarda de Araújo
 
Mídia Kit de 2016 do site Drops de Jogos
Mídia Kit de 2016 do site Drops de JogosMídia Kit de 2016 do site Drops de Jogos
Mídia Kit de 2016 do site Drops de Jogos
Pedro Zambarda de Araújo
 
Lateral sinus thrombosis
Lateral sinus thrombosisLateral sinus thrombosis
Lateral sinus thrombosisDr. S. Mughal
 

Viewers also liked (13)

Our Approach to Coaching
Our Approach to CoachingOur Approach to Coaching
Our Approach to Coaching
 
Presentación croacia 37 fotos
Presentación croacia 37 fotosPresentación croacia 37 fotos
Presentación croacia 37 fotos
 
Kinesiology Citation Analysis Lightning Talk
Kinesiology Citation Analysis Lightning TalkKinesiology Citation Analysis Lightning Talk
Kinesiology Citation Analysis Lightning Talk
 
Visual resume/giulia.buranello
Visual resume/giulia.buranelloVisual resume/giulia.buranello
Visual resume/giulia.buranello
 
Presentation data inilam
Presentation data inilamPresentation data inilam
Presentation data inilam
 
Poema 090616203155-phpapp01
Poema 090616203155-phpapp01Poema 090616203155-phpapp01
Poema 090616203155-phpapp01
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
PRESENTATION [US - ENG]
PRESENTATION [US - ENG]PRESENTATION [US - ENG]
PRESENTATION [US - ENG]
 
Livro juris consolidada(4)
Livro juris consolidada(4)Livro juris consolidada(4)
Livro juris consolidada(4)
 
DUI Sentencing in Illinois
DUI Sentencing in IllinoisDUI Sentencing in Illinois
DUI Sentencing in Illinois
 
Drops de Jogos's media kit of 2015
Drops de Jogos's media kit of 2015Drops de Jogos's media kit of 2015
Drops de Jogos's media kit of 2015
 
Mídia Kit de 2016 do site Drops de Jogos
Mídia Kit de 2016 do site Drops de JogosMídia Kit de 2016 do site Drops de Jogos
Mídia Kit de 2016 do site Drops de Jogos
 
Lateral sinus thrombosis
Lateral sinus thrombosisLateral sinus thrombosis
Lateral sinus thrombosis
 

Similar to Sagacious research newsletter-23rd aug-2013

New Patent System
New Patent SystemNew Patent System
New Patent System
Melissa Woolfrey
 
Intellectual Property Rights in China Learning Through Two Case Studies
Intellectual Property Rights in China Learning Through Two Case StudiesIntellectual Property Rights in China Learning Through Two Case Studies
Intellectual Property Rights in China Learning Through Two Case StudiesKazuhiro Matsumoto
 
Patent act 1970
Patent act 1970Patent act 1970
Patent act 1970
Priyanka Jagtap
 
Patents - Introduction & Free Database And Sources
Patents - Introduction & Free Database And SourcesPatents - Introduction & Free Database And Sources
Patents - Introduction & Free Database And Sources
pandurangiabhishek
 
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company OverviewIntellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview
EPatents IP Services
 
Noordwijk Ip Presentation
Noordwijk Ip PresentationNoordwijk Ip Presentation
Noordwijk Ip Presentationwnhulsey
 
How To Protect Your Idea - Outlook Money Publication - Patent Filing Procedur...
How To Protect Your Idea - Outlook Money Publication - Patent Filing Procedur...How To Protect Your Idea - Outlook Money Publication - Patent Filing Procedur...
How To Protect Your Idea - Outlook Money Publication - Patent Filing Procedur...Rahul Dev
 
Why patent
Why patentWhy patent
Why patent
PatSnap
 
Significance patent
Significance patentSignificance patent
Significance patent
Chetan Sharma
 
A hand book on intellectual property
A hand book on intellectual propertyA hand book on intellectual property
A hand book on intellectual property
trademarkistpro
 
Patent law
Patent law Patent law
Patent law
SMadhuriparadesi
 
PGD in patent law and management
PGD in patent law and managementPGD in patent law and management
PGD in patent law and management
Indian Institute Of Patent and Trademark
 
411 on IP 101 for Tech-Geeks in the Startup World
411 on IP 101 for Tech-Geeks in the Startup World411 on IP 101 for Tech-Geeks in the Startup World
411 on IP 101 for Tech-Geeks in the Startup WorldG. Nagesh Rao
 
Playing The Patent Game
Playing The Patent GamePlaying The Patent Game
Playing The Patent Game
Andrew Wong
 
Getting Smart About Intellectual Property
Getting Smart About Intellectual PropertyGetting Smart About Intellectual Property
Getting Smart About Intellectual PropertyArvinPatel
 
Patents (1).pptx
Patents (1).pptxPatents (1).pptx
Patents (1).pptx
sumathy ys
 
Ijipr intellectual propery rights economy vs science and technology
Ijipr   intellectual propery rights economy vs science and technologyIjipr   intellectual propery rights economy vs science and technology
Ijipr intellectual propery rights economy vs science and technology
Hemanth Kumar
 
7 ipr jntu pharmacy
7 ipr jntu pharmacy7 ipr jntu pharmacy
7 ipr jntu pharmacy
Dr. Suman Pattanayak
 
Competitive landsape by Clarivate Analytics
Competitive landsape by Clarivate AnalyticsCompetitive landsape by Clarivate Analytics
Competitive landsape by Clarivate Analytics
Sam Nixon
 
Frank Ip Slides For Highland
Frank   Ip Slides For HighlandFrank   Ip Slides For Highland
Frank Ip Slides For HighlandMichael Gaiss
 

Similar to Sagacious research newsletter-23rd aug-2013 (20)

New Patent System
New Patent SystemNew Patent System
New Patent System
 
Intellectual Property Rights in China Learning Through Two Case Studies
Intellectual Property Rights in China Learning Through Two Case StudiesIntellectual Property Rights in China Learning Through Two Case Studies
Intellectual Property Rights in China Learning Through Two Case Studies
 
Patent act 1970
Patent act 1970Patent act 1970
Patent act 1970
 
Patents - Introduction & Free Database And Sources
Patents - Introduction & Free Database And SourcesPatents - Introduction & Free Database And Sources
Patents - Introduction & Free Database And Sources
 
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company OverviewIntellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview
Intellectual Property Serrvices Outsourcing- India Company Overview
 
Noordwijk Ip Presentation
Noordwijk Ip PresentationNoordwijk Ip Presentation
Noordwijk Ip Presentation
 
How To Protect Your Idea - Outlook Money Publication - Patent Filing Procedur...
How To Protect Your Idea - Outlook Money Publication - Patent Filing Procedur...How To Protect Your Idea - Outlook Money Publication - Patent Filing Procedur...
How To Protect Your Idea - Outlook Money Publication - Patent Filing Procedur...
 
Why patent
Why patentWhy patent
Why patent
 
Significance patent
Significance patentSignificance patent
Significance patent
 
A hand book on intellectual property
A hand book on intellectual propertyA hand book on intellectual property
A hand book on intellectual property
 
Patent law
Patent law Patent law
Patent law
 
PGD in patent law and management
PGD in patent law and managementPGD in patent law and management
PGD in patent law and management
 
411 on IP 101 for Tech-Geeks in the Startup World
411 on IP 101 for Tech-Geeks in the Startup World411 on IP 101 for Tech-Geeks in the Startup World
411 on IP 101 for Tech-Geeks in the Startup World
 
Playing The Patent Game
Playing The Patent GamePlaying The Patent Game
Playing The Patent Game
 
Getting Smart About Intellectual Property
Getting Smart About Intellectual PropertyGetting Smart About Intellectual Property
Getting Smart About Intellectual Property
 
Patents (1).pptx
Patents (1).pptxPatents (1).pptx
Patents (1).pptx
 
Ijipr intellectual propery rights economy vs science and technology
Ijipr   intellectual propery rights economy vs science and technologyIjipr   intellectual propery rights economy vs science and technology
Ijipr intellectual propery rights economy vs science and technology
 
7 ipr jntu pharmacy
7 ipr jntu pharmacy7 ipr jntu pharmacy
7 ipr jntu pharmacy
 
Competitive landsape by Clarivate Analytics
Competitive landsape by Clarivate AnalyticsCompetitive landsape by Clarivate Analytics
Competitive landsape by Clarivate Analytics
 
Frank Ip Slides For Highland
Frank   Ip Slides For HighlandFrank   Ip Slides For Highland
Frank Ip Slides For Highland
 

Sagacious research newsletter-23rd aug-2013

  • 1. © 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved. www.sagaciousresearch.com India has experienced enormous economic growth over the past two decades due to the economic reforms that opened India‟s markets to global investors. During this time, India has worked hard to balance the rights of patent holders and meet the needs of its socio-economically backward population. But from time to time; India has faced severe criticism from other nations like US for not abiding the patent laws. The Supreme Court ruling of April denying US multinational Novartis‟ request to retain the patent on a cancer drug was disliked by America‟s corporate and they alleged India as a Nation extremely hostile towards patent laws. Indian ambassador to the US, Nirupama Rao, thus intervened in the matter and assured US that this is hardly evidence of a climate hostile to either innovation or US-based companies. Indian Patent Office issued more than 4000 patents from 2005 to 2011 for pharmaceutical inventions. Of those granted, 20-30% was awarded to US-based companies each year. Citing this case, she explained that Indian court ruling only reinforced the premium that should be placed on actually novel patents, strengthening, not weakening, the sanctity of patent laws. Besides this, in past six decades, India has issued one compulsory license on a compound pharmaceutical not to weaken but only strengthen the patent laws. To further assert India‟s commitment to enhance India-US strategic partnership as they cooperate on health care, disease control and prevention, she added that Indian Intellectual property laws passed over past forty years have extensively protected patents and trademarks. The amendments to Patents Act of 1970 in 1999, 2002 and 2005, is exemplary in the developing world. Also, India is committed to comply with international treaties such as the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement of the World Trade Organization. S A G A C I O U S U P D A T E S Sagacious Welcomes New Batch of 1o Techn0-Legal Patent Analysts In Its Team Sagacious Research recently hired 10 Patent Analysts in multiple domains. These analysts come from renowned colleges like BITs- Pilani, National Institute of Technology, IIIT & IP-University. With this, Sagacious Research is now having a team of over 70 techno- legal experts divided in multiple teams. India’s Assurance to US – Patent Laws Are Complied “The Patents Act of 1970, amended in 1999, 2002 and 2005, is considered a model in the developing world. Critics who say otherwise are simply wrong.”- Nirupama Rao Vol- 1, Date: 23rd August, 2013 G E N E R A L N E W S Follow Us at: We Believe in Building Trust…
  • 2. © 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved. www.sagaciousresearch.com The data sourced from the Office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, India reveals that on August 13, 2013, 1, 58,449 patent applications, where requests for examination have been filed, are pending in India. Delhi has maximum number (57,385) of pending patent applications and is closely followed by Chennai (52,891), Kolkata (29,223) and Mumbai (18,950). Government has blamed the shortage of patent examiners and substantive increase in filing of patent applications in India for this dismal scenario. Government also claims that it has completed the process of selection of 248 patent examiners. But, the fact is that its close competitor China has recently updated its patent system while India has not taken any concrete move in this direction. It is a fact that the grant of patents is a quasi-judicial process and is inherently time-consuming as it involves execution of a process including several steps such as filing of requests for examination, examination of the application, publication of the application, and disposal of filed pre-grant oppositions. Already, India has been constantly facing severe criticism from the side of US Pharmaceutical multinationals and US Govt. for having harsh patent laws and not working towards creating a favorable IP environment. So, if urgent counter-measures are not taken, it will adversely impact the image of Indian patent system on the global scale. U.S. consumer electronics giant filed 259 invention patent applications and 132 design patent applications outshining all other foreign countries. Samsung, its most powerful competitor stands second in terms of design patent applications and ranks 16th among foreign applicants in the invention patent category. Earlier Apple did not file many patents in Taiwan. But taking heed of the mounting competition in the smartphone market in recent past, Apple made a conscious decision to follow the aggressive approach of Taiwanese smartphone maker HTC Corp. and began seeking more protection for its Intellectual Property. In a bid to outshine its competitors like HTC and Samsung, Apple filed 65 times more design patent applications and almost equal number of invention patent applications in 2013. In contrast, only 124 invention patent applications and 32 design patent applications were filed by HTC while Samsung Electronics Co. filed 93 smartphone-related patent applications and 85 design patent applications in this six-month period. Filings on Rise but 1.58L Patent Applications Remain Pending in India Delhi has 57385, followed closely by Chennai 52891, Kolkata 29223 & Mumbai 18950 It is high time that Indian Government realize that patent system of country plays a vital role in strengthening the economy and a favorable IP environment brings in more FDI. As such, every country across the globe is committed to update and strengthen its patent system while India is still lagging behind. In already grim Indian IP environment, a recent and shocking revelation that around 1.58 lakh patent applications are awaiting examination in all the Indian Patent Offices spread across Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata and Mumbai comes as a big blow. The written reply of Minister of State for Commerce and Industry, EM Sudarsana Natchiappan, to the Parliament of India has revealed a grim picture at Indian Patent Offices. IPO Statistics Revelation- Apple Tops Foreign Patent Filings in Taiwan U.S. consumer electronics giant filed 259 invention patent applications and 132 design patent applications. In the recent report of Intellectual Property Office (IPO) for the January-June period of 2013, Apple Inc. has conquered the top slot for foreign patent filings in Taiwan. IPO‟s statistics report for the first half of this year has recently released. It reports that Apple has filed maximum patents in both patent application categories for the very first time in Taiwan.
  • 3. © 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved. www.sagaciousresearch.com A gazing log will be made accessible to users by Google which will track the identified items viewed by them and exactly tell what they were looking at for a specified amount of time. What comes as a great relief is that this method would not tell what you looked at, but only that for how long you looked at it. Then, Google will be able to charge advertisers based on time a user spent looking at, say an advertisement, in some Google application. The whole idea is genuinely interesting though the practical implementation and feasibility of this method remains questionable until Google implements it in the public domain. The oldest Jobs-contributed patent application dates back to Sept. 26, 2002, and the most recent was filed a year after Steve Jobs died. Many of these are yet to be reviewed and it‟s impossible to tell when and which patent will be Steve Jobs‟ last. STOP STARING! GOOGLE’s creepiest patent is watching you. A crazy and weird patent has been filed by Google in the area of wearable technology. A method has been developed by Google to exactly tell what users are gazing at and for how long. In their patent filing, an explanation of this method is given which uses a front facing camera and a camera that tracks eye movement. In this method, a gaze tracking technique is implemented that uses a head mounted gaze tracking device communicating with a server. The server receives scene images from the tracking device which captures external scenes viewed by a user wearing it and also receives gaze direction information. This information indicates where exactly the user was gazing while viewing the external scenes. An image recognition algorithm is executed on the scene images to identify items within the external scenes viewed by the user. T E C H N O L O G Y Steve Jobs Still Earning Patent USPTO has recently granted a design patent in his name. This design patent is for an ornamental building panel for a store USPTO records have revealed some incredible information about the Intellectual Property in name of legendary Steve Jobs. Steve Jobs is still earning patents in his name and USPTO has recently granted a design patent in his name. This design patent is for an ornamental building panel for a store. The first patent granted in his name, in contrast, was for an ornamental design of a computer. Steve was a legendary inventor and majority of his patents are design patents only. As per USPTO records, Steve Jobs name appears on 402 patents of Apple as inventor.
  • 4. © 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved. www.sagaciousresearch.com title of ruling head in the world of digital communication devices. The plot of their war revolves much around the story of Pacific Rim, where the aliens unlock their bio weapons Kaijus to conquer the Earth and the human join hands to create Jaegers, oversized humanoids piloted by two humans whose brains are connected to each other by neural bridges. Kaijus, the colossal monsters make multiple attempts in various parts of the world to destroy the humanoids, the establishments made by the human kind but on their way stood these gigantic humanoids, invented specially to protect the human race from the constant and repetitive conquests made by Kaijus. Similarly, the US tech giant Apple and the Korean tech giant Samsung seem to be in a constant war to accrue larger market share, larger share of profits and to pull each other‟s products off the market shelves. The saga began in April 2011, when Apple accused Samsung for copying design of the hardware and software features like double-tap zooming. Samsung counter-sued Cupertino-based Apple for infringing on its software patents. Samsung was found guilty of the infringements by courts of law and thus Apple was awarded with over $ 1billion for the damages, this was later on reduced to just over $450 billion as the jury was found to have committed an error in determining the damages. In June 2011, Samsung alleged that iPhone4 and iPad2 violated patents of the Korean company. The International Trade Commission happened to favor Samsung by imposing a ban on the sale of Apple phones in US jurisdiction. Just a week after Samsung sued Apple in the ITC court, Apple filed a suit against Samsung citing several patent infringements on the hardware designs on the iPhone. Continuing the battle, Apple filed another law suit in California district accusing Samsung of infringing on utility patents in Samsung‟s new products. Samsung reverted back stating that “all generations” of iPhone & iPad infringe on its own patents. By this time the war had already reached the peak, but, Apple kept on adding new Samsung products to the list as and when they were launched in the market. Just as we see intense use of nuclear warheads and machine in the movie, in this tech giant‟s war we witness persuasive arguments between lobbyists, policymakers, media, trade officials and government agencies. Although the giant machines, fireworks, flames VFX effects in the smartphone war of Apple and Samsung is missing but the war between lawyers in multiple courts across the oceans and both the giants claiming for settlement of multi-billion dollars for the damages look no different from an intense war scene from Pacific Rim. Redefining Apple & Samsung Patent Disputes in Hollywood Movie, “Pacific Rim” Style USPTO has recently granted a design patent in his name. This design patent is for an ornamental building panel for a store Apple & Samsung smartphone battle is the most popular patents infringement tussles till date that has left no leaf unturned with respect to smartphone aesthetics. Be it software or the hardware, both Apple and Samsung have spilled law suits over each other worth multi billion dollars in multiple regions and for multiple attributes. The Samsung and Apple patent war in smartphone domain seems just like a war between gigantic Karjus and Jaegars of Pacific Rim, who are fighting for their pride, safeguarding their business and future interests so as to attain the
  • 5. © 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved. www.sagaciousresearch.com Currently no approved bio-similars of Herceptin are available in India though two Indian firms are working on its generic equivalents. Time and again, western drug manufacturers in India have been accused of greedy pricing. As far as Herceptin is concerned, it has been Roche‟s third-biggest seller notching global revenues of 3.08 billion Swiss francs just in the first half of 2013. Amidst all these accusations, Roche decided not to pursue the patent and held the general intellectual property (IP) environment in India accountable for their decision. However, Roche‟s Herceptin would remain on sale in India as its global patents expire in 2019. Roche stated that India‟s patent laws are quite harsh compared to other countries as India attempts to make vital medications affordable to its enormous poor population. This, probably, is also the biggest reason behind on-going intellectual property battles of Western drug-makers in India. More than a million women in India suffer from aggressive HE2+ breast cancer since this patent has been in force (from 2006) and less than 10% of them were able to get access to Herceptin. Consequently India‟s Cancer Patients‟ Aid Association have challenged this patent arguing that a drug whose single dose costs Rs. 6-8 lakhs is excessively priced for a country like India. Till now, Roche had not disclosed its price for Trastuzumab in India, sold under the brand name Herceptin. Herceptin is an extremely efficient drug for the treatment of breast cancer. It can be administered alone, along with chemotherapy and after surgery. It even helps to avoid surgery, in many cases. L I F E S C I E N C E S Patent Granted for a “Death Test Device” to Two Lancaster University Professors “Death test device” can analyze tiny endothelial cells inside the ¬capillaries to determine the aging pace of one’s body. Two Physics professors at Lancaster University have come up with a revolutionary invention. Aneta Stefanovska and Peter McClintock have patented a “death test device” that can analyze tiny endothelial cells inside the ¬capillaries to determine the aging pace of one‟s body. The device, which is expected to be out in a wrist watch-style, will use a painless laser beam to examine the cell functionality and estimate how long a person will live. The estimation will be given grades from 0 to 100 (Grade 0 meaning death and 100 meaning optimum function). The beam can also be used to test for diseases like cancer and dementia. They will also create a database where data of every person could be maintained and used as reference against others to predict years left with someone before he will die. The device is expected to be available to doctors within three years. Roche not to pursue Indian patent for breast-cancer drug, Herceptin USPTO has recently granted a design patent in his name. This design patent is for an ornamental building panel for a store In earlier this year, Indian health ministry committee had urged the Government of India to issue a “compulsory license” that would pave way for a licensing agreement between Swiss drug-maker „Roche‟ and some indigenous drug manufacturer of India and facilitate manufacturing of cheaper generic version of its top-selling breast cancer drug, “Herceptin”.
  • 6. © 2007 - 2013 Sagacious Research. All Rights Reserved. www.sagaciousresearch.com Roche‟s generosity to give up the Herceptin patent is a welcome move. However, to solve the accessibility issue of such an important life-saving drug, there is an urgent need of pro-active support of Government to the pharmaceutical sector to find the breakthrough bio- equivalent of Herceptin. A B O U T S A G A C I O U S Sagacious Research is ISO Certified India based Global Patent & IP advisory and analytic firm offering cost effective & multi-lingual Patent Searching, Patent Licensing Support, Patent Alerts & Watches, Patent Drafting Support Services in over 100 countries and in over 16 Asian/European languages. An ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 27001:2005 Certified Company 70+ Techno-legal Experts | 16+ Languages | 100 Countries | 5, 000+ Projects | 100% Returning Clients C O N T A C T S A G A C I O U S R E S E A R C H Germany Kathrin Reinhardt +49 6107 6383 396 United Kingdom Aarti Thakral +44 (0) 203287 5098 Rest of Europe Raphael Joseph +353 125 49910 Australia Steve Johnson +61 3 9028 4017 United States 6387 Fairways Drive Longmont, CO-80503 T: (303) 506-4192 F: (803) 831-1899 India (HQ) 303-B, Enkay Town Plaza, Block-I, Palam Vihar, Gurgaon-122017, Delhi/NCR, India T: +91 124 4033431 F: +91 11 43850700 Web: info@sagaciousresearch.com www.sagaciousresearch.com