With current new amendments and law adding on in the Indian Judiciary, its important to know and be well aware of the statutes. You can consider this subject as 'Grammar of Law'. Teaches you exactly are the statutes made by the Legislative authorities as well. From use of particular language to construction of words this presentation almost includes all the part of how a statute is made, how they are learned and how exactly are the legal maxims used.
CONTEMPORNEA EXPOSITIO EXTERNAL AID TO INTERPRETATIONShreya Chaurasia
Interpretation means the art of finding out the true sense of an enactment by giving the words of the enactment their natural and ordinary meaning.
It is the process of ascertaining the true meaning of the words used in a statute.
The Court is not expected to interpret arbitrarily and therefore there have been certain principles which have evolved out of the continuous exercise by the Courts. These principles are sometimes called ‘rules of interpretation’.
The object of interpretation of statutes is to determine the intention of the legislature conveyed expressly or impliedly in the language used.
Contempornea Expositio means that the meaning of words in a document are to be understood in the sense which they bore at the time of the document.
Contemporaneous exposition is the best and strongest in law. It is said that the best exposition of a statute or any other document is that which it has received from contemporary authority.
Contemporanea expositio est optima means usage or practice developed under a statute is indicative of the meaning ascribed to its words by contemporary opinion.
External Aid includes Historical Background,The original bill drafted and introduced,Legal Dictionaries,Debates in the Legislature,Judicial Construction etc.
With current new amendments and law adding on in the Indian Judiciary, its important to know and be well aware of the statutes. You can consider this subject as 'Grammar of Law'. Teaches you exactly are the statutes made by the Legislative authorities as well. From use of particular language to construction of words this presentation almost includes all the part of how a statute is made, how they are learned and how exactly are the legal maxims used.
CONTEMPORNEA EXPOSITIO EXTERNAL AID TO INTERPRETATIONShreya Chaurasia
Interpretation means the art of finding out the true sense of an enactment by giving the words of the enactment their natural and ordinary meaning.
It is the process of ascertaining the true meaning of the words used in a statute.
The Court is not expected to interpret arbitrarily and therefore there have been certain principles which have evolved out of the continuous exercise by the Courts. These principles are sometimes called ‘rules of interpretation’.
The object of interpretation of statutes is to determine the intention of the legislature conveyed expressly or impliedly in the language used.
Contempornea Expositio means that the meaning of words in a document are to be understood in the sense which they bore at the time of the document.
Contemporaneous exposition is the best and strongest in law. It is said that the best exposition of a statute or any other document is that which it has received from contemporary authority.
Contemporanea expositio est optima means usage or practice developed under a statute is indicative of the meaning ascribed to its words by contemporary opinion.
External Aid includes Historical Background,The original bill drafted and introduced,Legal Dictionaries,Debates in the Legislature,Judicial Construction etc.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATIONTejinder Bhatti
Interpretation means the art of finding out the true sense of an enactment by giving the words their natural and ordinary meaning whereas Construction means drawing conclusions in the basis of the true spirit of the enactment.
Interpretation takes place when we look for the original meaning of the constitution. All other forms of constitutional analysis engage in construction
Code of civil procedure 1908 pleading plaint written statementDr. Vikas Khakare
This explains what is pleading, rules of pleading. Plaint, its contents, when it can be amended. Written Statement, its contents, set off and counter claim.
The slides relate to Part - III of the Indian Constitution i.e. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. It elaborates on the violation of fundamental rights under the constitution. Useful for Law students and Professionals.
AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM: PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICEsebis1
These slides are regarding Audi Alteram Administrative law is the body of law that governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. Administrative law deals with the decision-making of administrative units of government such as tribunals, boards or commissions in such areas as international trade, manufacturing, taxation, broadcasting, immigration and transport. Administrative law expanded greatly during the twentieth century, as legislative bodies worldwide created more government agencies to regulate the social, economic and political spheres of human interaction.
4. DEFINITION Administrative law deals with the powers and functions of the administrative authorities, the manner in which the powers are to be exercised by them and the remedies that are available to the aggrieved persons when those powers are abused by the authorities. Jain and Jain – Four aspects of Administrative Law. Administrative Law deals with mainly 4 aspects: Composition and the powers of administrative authorities. Fixes the limits of the powers of these authorities. Prescribes the procedure to be followed by these authorities in exercising such powers. Controls these administrative authorities through judicial and other means.
THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE Natural justice is a principle that is intended to ensure law with fairness and to secure justice. The Principles of Natural Justice have come out from the need of man to protect himself from the excesses of organized power. The Principles of Natural Justice are considered the basic Human Rights because they attempt to bring justice to the parties naturally. THREE BASIC PILLARS Three core points in the concept of principles of natural justice include: Nemo in propria causa judex, esse debet - No one should be made a judge in his own case, or the rule against bias. Audi alteram partem - Hear the other party, or the rule of fair hearing, or the rule that no one should be condemned unheard. Speaking order or reasoned decision- Speaking order means an order which contains reasons for the decision. No system of law can survive without these three basic pillars.
‘’Audi alteram partum means ‘‘hear the other side’’ or ‘‘no man should be condemned unheard 'or ‘‘both the sides must be heard before passing any order’’. This is the basic requirement of rule of law.
AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM “A party is not to suffer in person or in purse without an opportunity of being heard.’’ It is mainly applicable in the field of administrative action and is regarded as the first principle of civilised jurisprudence. In short, before an order is passed against any person, reasonable opportunity of being heard must be given to him.
The maxim includes two elements • NOTICE. • HEARING.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATIONTejinder Bhatti
Interpretation means the art of finding out the true sense of an enactment by giving the words their natural and ordinary meaning whereas Construction means drawing conclusions in the basis of the true spirit of the enactment.
Interpretation takes place when we look for the original meaning of the constitution. All other forms of constitutional analysis engage in construction
Code of civil procedure 1908 pleading plaint written statementDr. Vikas Khakare
This explains what is pleading, rules of pleading. Plaint, its contents, when it can be amended. Written Statement, its contents, set off and counter claim.
The slides relate to Part - III of the Indian Constitution i.e. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. It elaborates on the violation of fundamental rights under the constitution. Useful for Law students and Professionals.
AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM: PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICEsebis1
These slides are regarding Audi Alteram Administrative law is the body of law that governs the activities of administrative agencies of government. Administrative law deals with the decision-making of administrative units of government such as tribunals, boards or commissions in such areas as international trade, manufacturing, taxation, broadcasting, immigration and transport. Administrative law expanded greatly during the twentieth century, as legislative bodies worldwide created more government agencies to regulate the social, economic and political spheres of human interaction.
4. DEFINITION Administrative law deals with the powers and functions of the administrative authorities, the manner in which the powers are to be exercised by them and the remedies that are available to the aggrieved persons when those powers are abused by the authorities. Jain and Jain – Four aspects of Administrative Law. Administrative Law deals with mainly 4 aspects: Composition and the powers of administrative authorities. Fixes the limits of the powers of these authorities. Prescribes the procedure to be followed by these authorities in exercising such powers. Controls these administrative authorities through judicial and other means.
THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE Natural justice is a principle that is intended to ensure law with fairness and to secure justice. The Principles of Natural Justice have come out from the need of man to protect himself from the excesses of organized power. The Principles of Natural Justice are considered the basic Human Rights because they attempt to bring justice to the parties naturally. THREE BASIC PILLARS Three core points in the concept of principles of natural justice include: Nemo in propria causa judex, esse debet - No one should be made a judge in his own case, or the rule against bias. Audi alteram partem - Hear the other party, or the rule of fair hearing, or the rule that no one should be condemned unheard. Speaking order or reasoned decision- Speaking order means an order which contains reasons for the decision. No system of law can survive without these three basic pillars.
‘’Audi alteram partum means ‘‘hear the other side’’ or ‘‘no man should be condemned unheard 'or ‘‘both the sides must be heard before passing any order’’. This is the basic requirement of rule of law.
AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM “A party is not to suffer in person or in purse without an opportunity of being heard.’’ It is mainly applicable in the field of administrative action and is regarded as the first principle of civilised jurisprudence. In short, before an order is passed against any person, reasonable opportunity of being heard must be given to him.
The maxim includes two elements • NOTICE. • HEARING.
Interpretation of statues: Meaning, object & types.legalpuja22
Introduction to Statutory Interpretation
Definition: Statutory interpretation refers to the process of interpreting and applying statutes or laws enacted by legislative bodies.
Importance: It helps in understanding the meaning and purpose behind laws, resolving ambiguities, and ensuring fair and just application of legislation.
Meaning of Statute
A statute is a formal written enactment of a legislative body, which may be national, regional, or local in scope.
Statutes can encompass a wide range of subjects, from criminal law to tax regulations to civil rights.
Object of Statutory Interpretation
The primary object of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature.
This involves understanding the purpose and objectives behind the enactment of a statute.
Reason for Statutory Interpretation
Ambiguity: Statutes may contain ambiguous language or concepts that require interpretation.
Evolution: Societal norms and values evolve over time, necessitating reinterpretation of existing laws.
Advances in technology and globalization may also require reinterpretation of statutes.
Nature of Statutory Interpretation
Dynamic Process: Statutory interpretation is not static; it evolves with changing circumstances and societal values.
Judicial Discretion: Courts have discretion in interpreting statutes, but must do so within the framework of established legal principles.
Scope of Interpretation
Literal Interpretation: Interpreting statutes based solely on the literal meaning of the words used.
Purposive Interpretation: Focusing on the purpose and objectives behind the enactment of a statute.
Contextual Interpretation: Considering the broader context, including legislative history and societal norms.
Types of Statutes
Codifying Statutes: Consolidate and organize existing laws on a particular subject into a single statute.
Example: The Indian Penal Code, 1860, which consolidates laws related to criminal offenses in India.
Consolidating Statutes: Combine various statutes or parts of statutes related to a specific subject into one comprehensive statute.
Example: The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which consolidates laws related to civil procedure in Indian courts.
Declaratory Statutes: Clarify existing laws or legal principles without making substantive changes.
Example: The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which clarified the rights of Hindu women in matters of inheritance.
Remedial Statutes: Provide mechanisms for addressing legal disputes and enforcing rights.
Example: The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which provides remedies for consumers against unfair trade practices.
Enabling Statutes: Empower government agencies to create regulations within specified areas.
Example: The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, which empowers the Reserve Bank of India to regulate the banking sector in India.
Disabling Statutes: Restrict or prohibit certain actions or behaviors.
Copy of my presentation on the topic "Interpretation of Securities Laws" at a seminar organised by Pune Chapter of ICSI on March 31, 2017. The presentation deals with some basic and yet, key interpretation strategies for handling securities laws matters.
Principles of constitutional interpretation of list prepared by Rajashree J J...sundarsasane
In these SLIDES there are various principles and doctrines of legal interpretation of statutes, law and provisions,this is according to article 245 to 255 and article 13 of the Indian constitution.
Nature of law and administration of justice by Dr. Rajashree J. Jawalesundarsasane
This topic deals with definition and concept of law , kinds and sources of law and Administration of Justice under Jurisprudence. This topic is useful for law students and for general public to understand the basic concepts ,
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
2. Statutory interpretation is the process of interpreting and
applying legislation to decide cases.
Interpretation is necessary when case involves suble or
ambiguous aspects of a statute.
Generally, the words of a statute have a plain and
straightforward meaning. But in some cases, there may be
ambiguity or vagueness in the words of the statute that must
be resolved by the judge. The reason for ambiguity or
vagueness of a legislation is the fundamental nature of
language. It is not always possible to precisely transform
the intention of the legislature into written words.
3. To find the meanings of statutes, judges use various
tools and methods of statutory interpretation, including
traditional canons of statutory interpretation, legislative
history, and purpose. In common law jurisdictions, the
judiciary may apply rules of statutory interpretation to
legislation enacted by the legislature or to delegated
legislation such as administrative agency regulations.
4. Literal Rule (aka PlainMeaning Rule) - It means that
statutes are to be interpreted using the ordinary
meaning of the language of the statute unless a statute
explicitly defines some of its terms otherwise. In other
words, the law must be read, word for word, and it
should not divert from its true meaning.
5. According to this rule, when a word does not contain any
definition in a statute, it must be given its plain, ordinary,
and literal meaning. If the word is clear, it must be
applied, even though the intention of the legislature may
have been different or the result is harsh or undesirable.
The literal rule is what the law says instead of what the
law means.
6. In J.P. Bansal v. State of Rajasthan 2003, SC
observed that the intention of the legislature is
primarily to be gathered from the language used, which
means that attention should be paid to what has been
said as also to what has not been said. As a
consequence, a construction which requires for its
support, addition, substitution, or removal of words or
which results in rejection of words as meaningless has
to be avoided. This is accordance with the case of
Crawford vs Spooner, 1846, where privy council
noted that the courts cannot aid the legislature's
defective phrasing of an Act, they cannot add or mend,
and by construction.
7. In M V Joshi vsM V Shimpi, AIR 1961, relating to
Food and Adulteration Act, it was
contented that the act does not apply to butter made
from curd. However, SC held that the word butter in
the said act is plain and clear and there is no need to
interpret it differently. Butter is butter whether made
from milk or curd.
8. A statues often contains a "definitions" section, which
explicitly defines the most important terms used in that
statute. However, some statutes omit a definitions section
entirely, or fail to define a particular term. The literal rule,
which is also known as the plain meaning rule, attempts to
guide courts faced with litigation that turns on the
meaning of a term not defined by the statute, or on that of
a word found within a definition itself.
9. Mischief rule - This rule attempts to determine the
legislator's intention.
Originating from a 16th century case in the United
Kingdom, its main aim is to determine the "mischief
and defect" that the statute in question has set out to
remedy, and what ruling would effectively implement
this remedy. Smith vs. Hughes [1960] 2 All E.R. 859
10. The rule was further illustrated in the case of Smith v
Hughes, 1960,
where under the Street Offences Act 1959, it was a
crime for prostitutes to "loiter or solicit in the street for
the purposes of prostitution". The defendants were
calling to men in the street from balconies and tapping
on windows. They claimed they were not guilty as they
were not in the "street." The judge applied the mischief
rule to come to the conclusion that they were guilty as
the intention of the Act was to cover the mischief of
harassment from prostitutes.
11. This rule is of narrower application than the golden rule
or the plain meaning rule, in that it can only be used to
interpret a statute and only when the statute was passed
to remedy a defect in the common law. This rule has
often been used to resolve ambiguities in cases in
which the literal rule cannot be applied.
12. The Mischief Rule is used by judges in statutory
interpretation in order to discover legislature's
intention. It essentially asks the question: By creating
an Act of Parliament what was the "mischief" that the
previous or existing law did not cover and this act
covers.
13. The application of this rule gives the judge more
discretion than the literal and the golden rule as it
allows him to effectively decide on Parliament's intent.
Legislative intent is determined by examining
secondary sources, such as committee reports, treatises,
law review articles and corresponding statutes
14. This rule was developed by Lord Coke in Sir John
Heydon's Case, 1584, where it was stated that there
were four points to be taken into consideration when
interpreting a statute:
1. What was the common law before the making of the
act?
2. What was the "mischief or defect" for which the
common law did not provide?
3. What remedy the parliament hath resolved and
appointed to cure the disease of the
commonwealth?
4. What is the true reason of the remedy?
15. Golden rule - It is a compromise between the plain
meaning (or literal) rule and the mischief rule. Like the
plain meaning rule, it gives the words of a statute their
plain, ordinary meaning. However, when this may lead
to an irrational result that is unlikely to be the
legislature's intention, the judge can depart from this
meaning. In the case of homographs, where a word can
have more than one meaning, the judge can choose the
preferred meaning. If the word only has one meaning,
and applying this meaning would lead to a bad
decision, the judge can apply a completely different
meaning.
16. This rule of statutory interpretation allows a shift from
the ordinary sense of a word(s) if the
overall content of the document demands it. This rule is
a modification of the literal rule. It states
that if the literal rule produces an absurdity, then the
court should look for another meaning of
the words to avoid that absurd result.
17. The rule was evolved by Parke B (who later became
Lord Wensleydale) in Becke v Smith, 1836 and in
Grey v Pearson, 1857, who stated, "The grammatical
and ordinary sense of the words is to be adhered to
unless that would lead to some absurdity or some
repugnance or inconsistency with the rest of the
instrument in which case the grammatical and ordinary
sense of the words may be modified so as to avoid the
absurdity and inconsistency, but no farther."
18. It is a very useful rule in the construction of a statute as
it allows to adhere to the ordinary meaning of the
words used, and to the grammatical construction,
unless that is at variance with the intention of the
legislature to be collected from the statute itself, or
leads to any manifest absurdity or repugnance, in which
case it allows the language to be varied or modified so
as to avoid such inconvenience.
19. The second use of the golden rule is in a wider sense, to
avoid a result that is obnoxious to
principles of public policy, even where words have
only one meaning. Bedford vs Bedford,
1935, is another interesting case that highlighted the
use of this rule.
20. It concerned a case where a son murdered his mother
and committed suicide. The courts were required to
rule on who then inherited the estate, the mother's
family, or the son's descendants. The mother had not
made a will and under the Administration of Justice Act
1925 her estate would be inherited by her next of kin,
i.e. her son. There was no ambiguity in the words of the
Act, but the court was not prepared to let the son who
had murdered his mother benefit from his crime. It was
held that the literal rule should not apply and that the
golden rule should be used to prevent the repugnant
situation of the son inheriting. The court held that if the
son inherits the estate that would amount to profiting
from a crime and that would be repugnant to the act.
21. Interpreting a statute to determine whether it
applies to a given set of facts often boils
down to analyzing whether a single word or
short phrase covers some element of the
factual situation before the judge.
22. Thus, the Golden rule implies that if a strict interpretation
of a statute would lead to an absurd
result then the meaning of the words should be so
construed so as to lead to the avoidance of such absurdity.
A further corollary to this rule is that in case there are
multiple constructions to effect the Golden rule the one
which favors the assessee should always be taken. This
rule is also known as the Rule of Reasonable
Construction.
23. Rule of Harmonious Construction - when there are
two provisions in a statute, which are in conflict with
each other, they should be interpreted such that effect
can be given to both and the construction which renders
either of them inoperative and useless should not be
adopted except in the last resort. Bengal immunity Co.
vs. State of Bihar (1955) 6 STC 446 (SC).
24. Noscitur a sociis -When a word is ambiguous, its
meaning may be determined by reference to the rest of
the statute.
25. Reddendo Singula Singulis -When a list of words has
a modifying phrase at the end, the phrase refers only to
the last word, e.g., firemen, policemen, and doctors in a
hospital. Here,"in a hospital" only applies to doctors
and not to firemen or policemen.
26.
27. Ejusdem Generis -When a list of two or more specific
descriptors are followed by more general descriptors,
the otherwise wide meaning of the general descriptors
must be restricted to the same class, if any, of the
specific words that precede them e.g. vehicles in
"cars,motor bikes,motor powered vehicles" would be
interpreted in a limited sense and therefore cannot be
interpreted as including air planes.