SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 17
Rule of Strict
Interpretation (Penal
and Tax Statutes)
© Sumiti Ahuja, Assistant Professor, LC-II,
Faculty of Law, DU
What is Strict
Interpretation/Construction?
• Strict construction occurs when ambiguous language is given its exact and
technical meaning, and no other equitable considerations or reasonable
implications are made.
• It involves narrow interpretation of a statute, clause or other legal writing. This
methodology uses the plain meaning of the words themselves, what is stated
literally or what the meaning was at the time and place when originally written.
Also referred to as original intent or strict interpretation. The interpretation of a
legal statute strictly on what is written and not looking at the intent of the makers
or spirit of the law. The plain meaning or letter of the law. [Black’s Law Dictionary]
• It refers to a particular legal philosophy of judicial interpretation that limits or
restricts judicial interpretation. Judges in this view should avoid drawing inferences
from a statute or constitution and focus only on the text itself.
• Critics of strict construction contend that this approach does
not always produce a just or reasonable result.
• The effect of rule of strict construction might be summed up
as: “where an equivocal word or an ambiguous sentence
leaves a reasonable doubt of its meaning which the canons
of interpretation fail to solve, the benefit of the doubt should
be given to the subject and against the legislature which has
failed to explain itself”. [Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes
(11th edn.)]
Difference between Strict Interpretation and
Liberal Interpretation
• Strict Construction/Interpretation means each of the words in Statute should be
interpreted by letter and no regard should be had to the spirit beyond the statute.
Liberal or beneficial construction/interpretation means the interpretation should be
made liberally with intention to advance the purpose or object of the statute. Thus, in
case of strict interpretation Courts may prefer the literal rule while for liberal
construction courts may prefer golden rule or mischief rule.
• Strict construction is the opposite of liberal construction, which permits a term to be
reasonably and fairly evaluated so as to implement the object and purpose of the
document.
• Generally, taxing and penal statutes are to be strictly construed while beneficial
legislation like ESI (Employees State Insurance) Act, Contract Labour Act or EPF
(Employees Provident Fund) Act should be liberally construed. Even in case of taxing
statutes, beneficial provisions should be liberally construed.
• “In State of Jharkhand v. Ambay Cements (2005) 1 SCC 368, it was held as
follows:
(a) Provision of exemption should be strictly construed. It is not open to Court to ignore
the conditions prescribed in the exemption notification;
(b) Mandatory rule must be strictly followed, while substantial compliance might suffice
in a directory rule;
(c) Whenever the statute prescribed that a particular act is to be done in a particular
manner and also lays down that failure to comply with the said requirement leads to
severe consequences, such requirement is mandatory;
(d) It is the cardinal rule of the interpretation that where a statute provides that a
particular thing should be done, it should be done in the manner prescribed and not in
any other way; and
(e) Where a statute is penal in character, it must be strictly construed and followed.”
Interpretation of Penal Statutes
• Penal statute is a statute that defines a criminal offense and prescribes its
corresponding penalty (fine, or imprisonment).
• As a general rule, strict construction must be applied to criminal statutes. This
means that a criminal statute may not be enlarged by implication or intent
beyond the fair meaning of the language used or the meaning that is
reasonably justified by its terms.
• Criminal statutes, therefore, will not be held to encompass offences and
individuals other than those clearly described and provided for in their
language. The strict construction of criminal statutes complements the rule of
lenity, which holds that ambiguity in a criminal statute should be resolved in
favor of the defendant.
• Rule of Lenity is a judicial doctrine requiring that those ambiguities in a
criminal statute relating to prohibition and penalties be resolved in
favor of the defendant if it is not contrary to legislative intent.
[Merriam-Webster Dictionary]
• “The penal statute which tends to deprive a person of right to life and
liberty has to be given strict interpretation or else many innocent
might become victims of discretionary decision making.”
[Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s Dilip Kumar and
Company & Ors., 2018 (361) E.L.T. 577 (SC)]
• In a modern welfare State there are many statutes prohibiting certain
acts. If legislature merely provides that the act is invalid and provides
for compensation as redress to the aggrieved person it will be classed
as a remedial statute. If the statute also provides for penalties for
disobedience of law, such as imprisonment or fine, it will be classed as
penal statute.
• If two possible constructions can be put upon a penal provision,
the court must lean towards that construction which exempts the
subject from the penalty rather than the one which imposes
penalty. [Lord Esher]
• Those not covered by express language of the penal statute should not
be roped in by stretching the language of the law.
• Provisions of a penal statute cannot be presumed to have retrospective
operation.
• Legislation which deals with jurisdiction and procedure in relation to
imposition of penalties will be strictly construed. Where certain
procedural requirements have been laid down by a statute to be
completed (in a statute dealing with punishments), the court is duty
bound to see that all these requirements have been complied with
before sentencing the accused.
• As long as the presumption of innocence of the accused prevails in this
country, the benefit of any lacuna or casus omissus must be given to
the accused. The job of plugging the loopholes must strictly be left to
the legislature and not assumed by the court.
Some Important Points (Exceptions to the general rule)
• Principal that penal statute is to be strictly construed is not of universal
application. Penal statute should be construed in a manner which will
suppress mischief and advance the object which the Legislature had in
view. [Lalita Jalan v. Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. (2003) 6 SCC 107].
• Even in relation to penal statute any narrow and pedantic, literal and
lexical construction may not always be given effect to. The law would
have to be interpreted having regard to the subject matter of the
offence and the object of the law it seeks to achieve. The purpose of
the law is not to allow the offender to sneak out of meshes of law.
Criminal Jurisprudence does not say so. [Indian Handicrafts Emporium
v. UOI, AIR 2003 SC 3240].
• In State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shri Ram Singh, AIR 2000 SC 575, it was
observed that Prevention of Corruption Act is a social legislation
defined to curb illegal activities of public servants and is designed to
be liberally construed so as to advance its object. Procedural delays
and technicalities of law should not be permitted to defeat the object
sought to be achieved by the Act.
• Supreme Court of India has given wide interpretations to provisions of
Food Adulteration Act 1954, in interpreting section 498A of IPC,
section 60(3) of NDPS Act 1985, etc.
Interpretation of Tax Statutes
• “Article 265 of the Constitution (265. Taxes not to be imposed save by
authority of law No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority
of law) prohibits the State from extracting tax from the citizens without
authority of law. It is axiomatic that taxation statute has to be
interpreted strictly because State cannot at their whims and fancies
burden the citizens without authority of law. In other words, when
competent Legislature mandates taxing certain persons/certain objects
in certain circumstances, it cannot be expanded/interpreted to include
those, which were not intended by the Legislature.” [Commissioner of
Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s Dilip Kumar and Company & Ors.,
2018 (361) E.L.T. 577 (SC)]
• In a taxing statute, one has to look at what is clearly said.
There is no equity about a tax. There is no intendment. There
is no presumption as to tax. Nothing is to be read in,
nothing to be implied.
• Basic principle for a charge under Tax Statutes is that : “No
tax can be imposed on the subject without words in the Act
clearly showing an intention to lay a burden upon him”.
• Burden of Proof to bring someone under a charge is on the
revenue and that of bringing assessee under
exemption/deduction on assessee.
• If interpretation of a fiscal enactment is open to doubt and two
views are reasonably possible then the one more beneficial or
favourable to the assessee should be adopted.
• If income is falling in two exempting sections, assessee can
choose to fall in both unless they are made mutually exclusive by
express provisions or necessary implication.
• Provisions related to machinery of assessment or collection
should be construed to make it workable and effectuate the levy
and advance the object of provisions.
• Construction of machinery provisions that disables the taxing
machinery, and enables the person to escape taxation be avoided.
• Penal provisions in case of taxing statutes to be strictly construed. In
case of any legislative ambiguity, the assessee should get the benefit of
doubt.
• Liberal Construction is required for provision of appeal and
provisions giving refund to the assessee and in favour of the assessee.
• In case of provisions creating rights, courts must lean in favour of
construction that saves the right instead of the one defeating it.
• In a recent Constitutional Bench decision of SC titled
Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s Dilip
Kumar and Company & Ors., 2018 (361) E.L.T. 577 (SC), in
relation to ambiguity in tax exemption notification, it was
held:
– (1) Exemption notification should be interpreted strictly; the
burden of proving applicability would be on the assessee to
show that his case comes within the parameters of the exemption
clause or exemption notification.
– (2) When there is ambiguity in exemption notification which
is subject to strict interpretation, the benefit of such
ambiguity cannot be claimed by the subject/assessee and it must
be interpreted in favour of the revenue.
THANK
YOU!

More Related Content

What's hot

Extenal aids to construction of Law
Extenal aids to construction of LawExtenal aids to construction of Law
Extenal aids to construction of Law
Tejas Shah
 
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptxUNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
ketan349068
 

What's hot (20)

CONTEMPORNEA EXPOSITIO EXTERNAL AID TO INTERPRETATION
CONTEMPORNEA EXPOSITIO EXTERNAL AID TO INTERPRETATIONCONTEMPORNEA EXPOSITIO EXTERNAL AID TO INTERPRETATION
CONTEMPORNEA EXPOSITIO EXTERNAL AID TO INTERPRETATION
 
Noscitor a sociis
Noscitor a sociisNoscitor a sociis
Noscitor a sociis
 
Extenal aids to construction of Law
Extenal aids to construction of LawExtenal aids to construction of Law
Extenal aids to construction of Law
 
INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT UNDER CPC
INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT UNDER CPCINHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT UNDER CPC
INHERENT POWERS OF THE COURT UNDER CPC
 
Presentationon colourable legislation
Presentationon colourable legislationPresentationon colourable legislation
Presentationon colourable legislation
 
Literal rule
Literal ruleLiteral rule
Literal rule
 
Delegated legislation
Delegated legislationDelegated legislation
Delegated legislation
 
Origin and development of equity
Origin and development of equityOrigin and development of equity
Origin and development of equity
 
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATIONDIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
 
Confession an analysis
Confession an analysisConfession an analysis
Confession an analysis
 
Mischief Rule Lesson Powerpoint
Mischief Rule Lesson PowerpointMischief Rule Lesson Powerpoint
Mischief Rule Lesson Powerpoint
 
Harmonius construction
Harmonius constructionHarmonius construction
Harmonius construction
 
Interpretation of Statutes
Interpretation of StatutesInterpretation of Statutes
Interpretation of Statutes
 
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ( LLB 507 &LLB 509 )
 PRIVATE  INTERNATIONAL  LAW ( LLB 507 &LLB 509 ) PRIVATE  INTERNATIONAL  LAW ( LLB 507 &LLB 509 )
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ( LLB 507 &LLB 509 )
 
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptxUNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
 
Ejusdem generis
Ejusdem generisEjusdem generis
Ejusdem generis
 
Temporary injunction
Temporary injunctionTemporary injunction
Temporary injunction
 
Casus omissus, interpretation of statutes
Casus omissus, interpretation of statutesCasus omissus, interpretation of statutes
Casus omissus, interpretation of statutes
 
Delegated legislation in india
Delegated legislation in indiaDelegated legislation in india
Delegated legislation in india
 
Delegated legislation
Delegated legislationDelegated legislation
Delegated legislation
 

Similar to Rule of Strict Interpretation (Penal and Tax Statutes).pptx

Doctrine of Strict Construction.pptx
Doctrine of Strict Construction.pptxDoctrine of Strict Construction.pptx
Doctrine of Strict Construction.pptx
rishabkumar919325
 
Doctrine of Strict Construction (1).pptx
Doctrine of Strict Construction (1).pptxDoctrine of Strict Construction (1).pptx
Doctrine of Strict Construction (1).pptx
ALEEM67
 
BENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION.pptx
BENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION.pptxBENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION.pptx
BENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION.pptx
BhartiPathariya
 
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatiseInterpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Aditya Singh
 
Interpretationofstatutes 121017080348-phpapp02
Interpretationofstatutes 121017080348-phpapp02Interpretationofstatutes 121017080348-phpapp02
Interpretationofstatutes 121017080348-phpapp02
Ashish Ransom
 

Similar to Rule of Strict Interpretation (Penal and Tax Statutes).pptx (20)

722646_1613896290.pptx
722646_1613896290.pptx722646_1613896290.pptx
722646_1613896290.pptx
 
Doctrine of Strict Construction.pptx
Doctrine of Strict Construction.pptxDoctrine of Strict Construction.pptx
Doctrine of Strict Construction.pptx
 
Doctrine of Strict Construction (1).pptx
Doctrine of Strict Construction (1).pptxDoctrine of Strict Construction (1).pptx
Doctrine of Strict Construction (1).pptx
 
BENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION.pptx
BENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION.pptxBENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION.pptx
BENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION.pptx
 
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatiseInterpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatise
 
Introduction to CPC.pptx
Introduction to CPC.pptxIntroduction to CPC.pptx
Introduction to CPC.pptx
 
Basic concepts of Income Tax
Basic concepts of Income Tax Basic concepts of Income Tax
Basic concepts of Income Tax
 
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)
 
Administrative Law - Part III - Slides.pdf
Administrative Law - Part III - Slides.pdfAdministrative Law - Part III - Slides.pdf
Administrative Law - Part III - Slides.pdf
 
DELEGATION OF POWERS IN CODE ON WAGES ,.pptx
DELEGATION OF POWERS IN CODE ON WAGES ,.pptxDELEGATION OF POWERS IN CODE ON WAGES ,.pptx
DELEGATION OF POWERS IN CODE ON WAGES ,.pptx
 
Bye-laws
Bye-lawsBye-laws
Bye-laws
 
limitation_book.pdf
limitation_book.pdflimitation_book.pdf
limitation_book.pdf
 
Interpretation of Taxing Statutes
Interpretation of Taxing StatutesInterpretation of Taxing Statutes
Interpretation of Taxing Statutes
 
Constitutional Validly Of Delegated Administration & Control Over.pptx
Constitutional Validly Of Delegated Administration & Control Over.pptxConstitutional Validly Of Delegated Administration & Control Over.pptx
Constitutional Validly Of Delegated Administration & Control Over.pptx
 
Interpretation of statutes
Interpretation of statutesInterpretation of statutes
Interpretation of statutes
 
Interpretationofstatutes 121017080348-phpapp02
Interpretationofstatutes 121017080348-phpapp02Interpretationofstatutes 121017080348-phpapp02
Interpretationofstatutes 121017080348-phpapp02
 
Interpretation of Statues PPT.pdf
Interpretation of Statues PPT.pdfInterpretation of Statues PPT.pdf
Interpretation of Statues PPT.pdf
 
Legal presentation.docx
Legal presentation.docxLegal presentation.docx
Legal presentation.docx
 
Sanction for prosecution of offences under chapter xii of the income tax act
Sanction for prosecution of offences under chapter xii of the income tax actSanction for prosecution of offences under chapter xii of the income tax act
Sanction for prosecution of offences under chapter xii of the income tax act
 
judicial remedies against administrative actions.pptx
judicial remedies against administrative actions.pptxjudicial remedies against administrative actions.pptx
judicial remedies against administrative actions.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

一比一原版(Columbia毕业证书)哥伦比亚大学毕业证原件一模一样
一比一原版(Columbia毕业证书)哥伦比亚大学毕业证原件一模一样一比一原版(Columbia毕业证书)哥伦比亚大学毕业证原件一模一样
一比一原版(Columbia毕业证书)哥伦比亚大学毕业证原件一模一样
doypbe
 
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
mefyqyn
 
Jual obat aborsi Bandung ( 085657271886 ) Cytote pil telat bulan penggugur ka...
Jual obat aborsi Bandung ( 085657271886 ) Cytote pil telat bulan penggugur ka...Jual obat aborsi Bandung ( 085657271886 ) Cytote pil telat bulan penggugur ka...
Jual obat aborsi Bandung ( 085657271886 ) Cytote pil telat bulan penggugur ka...
ZurliaSoop
 
官方认证新加坡国立大学毕业证(nus毕业证)成绩单电子版原版一模一样
官方认证新加坡国立大学毕业证(nus毕业证)成绩单电子版原版一模一样官方认证新加坡国立大学毕业证(nus毕业证)成绩单电子版原版一模一样
官方认证新加坡国立大学毕业证(nus毕业证)成绩单电子版原版一模一样
acyefsa
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Trial by media Do media trials serve aby purpose
Trial by media Do media trials serve aby purposeTrial by media Do media trials serve aby purpose
Trial by media Do media trials serve aby purpose
 
Law of succession-Notes for students studying law
Law of succession-Notes for students studying lawLaw of succession-Notes for students studying law
Law of succession-Notes for students studying law
 
Bad Spaniel's Consumer Survey on the Use of Disclaimers
Bad Spaniel's Consumer Survey on the Use of DisclaimersBad Spaniel's Consumer Survey on the Use of Disclaimers
Bad Spaniel's Consumer Survey on the Use of Disclaimers
 
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal ServicesStreamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
Streamline Legal Operations: A Guide to Paralegal Services
 
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASESHOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
 
一比一原版(Columbia毕业证书)哥伦比亚大学毕业证原件一模一样
一比一原版(Columbia毕业证书)哥伦比亚大学毕业证原件一模一样一比一原版(Columbia毕业证书)哥伦比亚大学毕业证原件一模一样
一比一原版(Columbia毕业证书)哥伦比亚大学毕业证原件一模一样
 
Respondent Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
Respondent Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docxRespondent Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
Respondent Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
 
Trending Topics in ITC Litigation with Knobbe Martens
Trending Topics in ITC Litigation with Knobbe MartensTrending Topics in ITC Litigation with Knobbe Martens
Trending Topics in ITC Litigation with Knobbe Martens
 
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx PresentationTTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
 
CASE STYDY Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt BY MUKUL TYAGI.pptx
CASE STYDY Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt BY MUKUL TYAGI.pptxCASE STYDY Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt BY MUKUL TYAGI.pptx
CASE STYDY Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt BY MUKUL TYAGI.pptx
 
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
 
File Taxes Online Simple Steps for Efficient Filing.pdf
File Taxes Online Simple Steps for Efficient Filing.pdfFile Taxes Online Simple Steps for Efficient Filing.pdf
File Taxes Online Simple Steps for Efficient Filing.pdf
 
How Can an Attorney Help With My Car Accident Claim?
How Can an Attorney Help With My Car Accident Claim?How Can an Attorney Help With My Car Accident Claim?
How Can an Attorney Help With My Car Accident Claim?
 
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
 
Jual obat aborsi Bandung ( 085657271886 ) Cytote pil telat bulan penggugur ka...
Jual obat aborsi Bandung ( 085657271886 ) Cytote pil telat bulan penggugur ka...Jual obat aborsi Bandung ( 085657271886 ) Cytote pil telat bulan penggugur ka...
Jual obat aborsi Bandung ( 085657271886 ) Cytote pil telat bulan penggugur ka...
 
Comprehensive Guide on Drafting Directors' Report and its ROC Compliances und...
Comprehensive Guide on Drafting Directors' Report and its ROC Compliances und...Comprehensive Guide on Drafting Directors' Report and its ROC Compliances und...
Comprehensive Guide on Drafting Directors' Report and its ROC Compliances und...
 
ORane M Cornish affidavit statement for New Britain court proving Wentworth'...
ORane M Cornish affidavit statement  for New Britain court proving Wentworth'...ORane M Cornish affidavit statement  for New Britain court proving Wentworth'...
ORane M Cornish affidavit statement for New Britain court proving Wentworth'...
 
From Scratch to Strong: Introduction to Drafting of Criminal Cases and Applic...
From Scratch to Strong: Introduction to Drafting of Criminal Cases and Applic...From Scratch to Strong: Introduction to Drafting of Criminal Cases and Applic...
From Scratch to Strong: Introduction to Drafting of Criminal Cases and Applic...
 
Embed-4-2.pdf vk[di-[sd[0edKP[p-[kedkpodekp
Embed-4-2.pdf vk[di-[sd[0edKP[p-[kedkpodekpEmbed-4-2.pdf vk[di-[sd[0edKP[p-[kedkpodekp
Embed-4-2.pdf vk[di-[sd[0edKP[p-[kedkpodekp
 
官方认证新加坡国立大学毕业证(nus毕业证)成绩单电子版原版一模一样
官方认证新加坡国立大学毕业证(nus毕业证)成绩单电子版原版一模一样官方认证新加坡国立大学毕业证(nus毕业证)成绩单电子版原版一模一样
官方认证新加坡国立大学毕业证(nus毕业证)成绩单电子版原版一模一样
 

Rule of Strict Interpretation (Penal and Tax Statutes).pptx

  • 1. Rule of Strict Interpretation (Penal and Tax Statutes) © Sumiti Ahuja, Assistant Professor, LC-II, Faculty of Law, DU
  • 2. What is Strict Interpretation/Construction? • Strict construction occurs when ambiguous language is given its exact and technical meaning, and no other equitable considerations or reasonable implications are made. • It involves narrow interpretation of a statute, clause or other legal writing. This methodology uses the plain meaning of the words themselves, what is stated literally or what the meaning was at the time and place when originally written. Also referred to as original intent or strict interpretation. The interpretation of a legal statute strictly on what is written and not looking at the intent of the makers or spirit of the law. The plain meaning or letter of the law. [Black’s Law Dictionary] • It refers to a particular legal philosophy of judicial interpretation that limits or restricts judicial interpretation. Judges in this view should avoid drawing inferences from a statute or constitution and focus only on the text itself.
  • 3. • Critics of strict construction contend that this approach does not always produce a just or reasonable result. • The effect of rule of strict construction might be summed up as: “where an equivocal word or an ambiguous sentence leaves a reasonable doubt of its meaning which the canons of interpretation fail to solve, the benefit of the doubt should be given to the subject and against the legislature which has failed to explain itself”. [Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes (11th edn.)]
  • 4. Difference between Strict Interpretation and Liberal Interpretation • Strict Construction/Interpretation means each of the words in Statute should be interpreted by letter and no regard should be had to the spirit beyond the statute. Liberal or beneficial construction/interpretation means the interpretation should be made liberally with intention to advance the purpose or object of the statute. Thus, in case of strict interpretation Courts may prefer the literal rule while for liberal construction courts may prefer golden rule or mischief rule. • Strict construction is the opposite of liberal construction, which permits a term to be reasonably and fairly evaluated so as to implement the object and purpose of the document. • Generally, taxing and penal statutes are to be strictly construed while beneficial legislation like ESI (Employees State Insurance) Act, Contract Labour Act or EPF (Employees Provident Fund) Act should be liberally construed. Even in case of taxing statutes, beneficial provisions should be liberally construed.
  • 5. • “In State of Jharkhand v. Ambay Cements (2005) 1 SCC 368, it was held as follows: (a) Provision of exemption should be strictly construed. It is not open to Court to ignore the conditions prescribed in the exemption notification; (b) Mandatory rule must be strictly followed, while substantial compliance might suffice in a directory rule; (c) Whenever the statute prescribed that a particular act is to be done in a particular manner and also lays down that failure to comply with the said requirement leads to severe consequences, such requirement is mandatory; (d) It is the cardinal rule of the interpretation that where a statute provides that a particular thing should be done, it should be done in the manner prescribed and not in any other way; and (e) Where a statute is penal in character, it must be strictly construed and followed.”
  • 6. Interpretation of Penal Statutes • Penal statute is a statute that defines a criminal offense and prescribes its corresponding penalty (fine, or imprisonment). • As a general rule, strict construction must be applied to criminal statutes. This means that a criminal statute may not be enlarged by implication or intent beyond the fair meaning of the language used or the meaning that is reasonably justified by its terms. • Criminal statutes, therefore, will not be held to encompass offences and individuals other than those clearly described and provided for in their language. The strict construction of criminal statutes complements the rule of lenity, which holds that ambiguity in a criminal statute should be resolved in favor of the defendant.
  • 7. • Rule of Lenity is a judicial doctrine requiring that those ambiguities in a criminal statute relating to prohibition and penalties be resolved in favor of the defendant if it is not contrary to legislative intent. [Merriam-Webster Dictionary] • “The penal statute which tends to deprive a person of right to life and liberty has to be given strict interpretation or else many innocent might become victims of discretionary decision making.” [Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s Dilip Kumar and Company & Ors., 2018 (361) E.L.T. 577 (SC)] • In a modern welfare State there are many statutes prohibiting certain acts. If legislature merely provides that the act is invalid and provides for compensation as redress to the aggrieved person it will be classed as a remedial statute. If the statute also provides for penalties for disobedience of law, such as imprisonment or fine, it will be classed as penal statute.
  • 8. • If two possible constructions can be put upon a penal provision, the court must lean towards that construction which exempts the subject from the penalty rather than the one which imposes penalty. [Lord Esher] • Those not covered by express language of the penal statute should not be roped in by stretching the language of the law. • Provisions of a penal statute cannot be presumed to have retrospective operation. • Legislation which deals with jurisdiction and procedure in relation to imposition of penalties will be strictly construed. Where certain procedural requirements have been laid down by a statute to be completed (in a statute dealing with punishments), the court is duty bound to see that all these requirements have been complied with before sentencing the accused.
  • 9. • As long as the presumption of innocence of the accused prevails in this country, the benefit of any lacuna or casus omissus must be given to the accused. The job of plugging the loopholes must strictly be left to the legislature and not assumed by the court.
  • 10. Some Important Points (Exceptions to the general rule) • Principal that penal statute is to be strictly construed is not of universal application. Penal statute should be construed in a manner which will suppress mischief and advance the object which the Legislature had in view. [Lalita Jalan v. Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. (2003) 6 SCC 107]. • Even in relation to penal statute any narrow and pedantic, literal and lexical construction may not always be given effect to. The law would have to be interpreted having regard to the subject matter of the offence and the object of the law it seeks to achieve. The purpose of the law is not to allow the offender to sneak out of meshes of law. Criminal Jurisprudence does not say so. [Indian Handicrafts Emporium v. UOI, AIR 2003 SC 3240].
  • 11. • In State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shri Ram Singh, AIR 2000 SC 575, it was observed that Prevention of Corruption Act is a social legislation defined to curb illegal activities of public servants and is designed to be liberally construed so as to advance its object. Procedural delays and technicalities of law should not be permitted to defeat the object sought to be achieved by the Act. • Supreme Court of India has given wide interpretations to provisions of Food Adulteration Act 1954, in interpreting section 498A of IPC, section 60(3) of NDPS Act 1985, etc.
  • 12. Interpretation of Tax Statutes • “Article 265 of the Constitution (265. Taxes not to be imposed save by authority of law No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law) prohibits the State from extracting tax from the citizens without authority of law. It is axiomatic that taxation statute has to be interpreted strictly because State cannot at their whims and fancies burden the citizens without authority of law. In other words, when competent Legislature mandates taxing certain persons/certain objects in certain circumstances, it cannot be expanded/interpreted to include those, which were not intended by the Legislature.” [Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s Dilip Kumar and Company & Ors., 2018 (361) E.L.T. 577 (SC)]
  • 13. • In a taxing statute, one has to look at what is clearly said. There is no equity about a tax. There is no intendment. There is no presumption as to tax. Nothing is to be read in, nothing to be implied. • Basic principle for a charge under Tax Statutes is that : “No tax can be imposed on the subject without words in the Act clearly showing an intention to lay a burden upon him”. • Burden of Proof to bring someone under a charge is on the revenue and that of bringing assessee under exemption/deduction on assessee.
  • 14. • If interpretation of a fiscal enactment is open to doubt and two views are reasonably possible then the one more beneficial or favourable to the assessee should be adopted. • If income is falling in two exempting sections, assessee can choose to fall in both unless they are made mutually exclusive by express provisions or necessary implication. • Provisions related to machinery of assessment or collection should be construed to make it workable and effectuate the levy and advance the object of provisions.
  • 15. • Construction of machinery provisions that disables the taxing machinery, and enables the person to escape taxation be avoided. • Penal provisions in case of taxing statutes to be strictly construed. In case of any legislative ambiguity, the assessee should get the benefit of doubt. • Liberal Construction is required for provision of appeal and provisions giving refund to the assessee and in favour of the assessee. • In case of provisions creating rights, courts must lean in favour of construction that saves the right instead of the one defeating it.
  • 16. • In a recent Constitutional Bench decision of SC titled Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s Dilip Kumar and Company & Ors., 2018 (361) E.L.T. 577 (SC), in relation to ambiguity in tax exemption notification, it was held: – (1) Exemption notification should be interpreted strictly; the burden of proving applicability would be on the assessee to show that his case comes within the parameters of the exemption clause or exemption notification. – (2) When there is ambiguity in exemption notification which is subject to strict interpretation, the benefit of such ambiguity cannot be claimed by the subject/assessee and it must be interpreted in favour of the revenue.

Editor's Notes

  1. Ref: https://www.taxmann.com/bookstore/bookshop/bookfiles/Interpretation%20of%20Statutes--V.S.%20Datey--Page%20No%20102-113.pdf
  2. Ref: https://law.jrank.org/pages/10549/Strict-Construction.html