SlideShare a Scribd company logo
RULE 37 
MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION 
-filed within the period for taking an Appeal. 
To WARRANT a new trial, the newly discovered evidence: 
1. Must have been discovered after trial 
2. Could not have been discovered and produced at the trial despite reasonable diligence 
3. If presented, would probably alter the result of the action 
GROUNDS FOR MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL 
1. FAME which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against and by reason of which 
such aggrieved party has probably been impaired in his rights. 
2. Newly discovered evidence w/c if presented would probably alter the result. 
3. Extrinsic or Collateral Fraud-fraud w/c prevents the aggrieved party from having a 
trial or presenting his case to the court, or was used to procure the judgment without fair 
submission of the controversy 
Intrinsic Fraud-refers to acts of a party at the trial w/c prevented a fair and just 
determination of the case. 
M ista ke-one w/c ordinary prudence could not have guarded against. 
Excusable Nealiaence-one w/c ordinary diligence and prudence could not have guarded 
against and by reason of w/c the rights of an aggrieved party have been probably 
impaired. 
TEST o f EXCUSABLE NEGLIGENCE-whether a party acted with ordinary 
prudence while transacting important business. 
MNT-must be supported by affidavit of merits, w/c should state facts and not mere opinions 
or conclusions of law (required only if the grounds relied upon are FAME) 
AoM may be dispensed with if: 
a. Judgment is null and void (court has no jurisdiction over the defendant or subject 
matter. 
b. Procedurally defective- Judgment by default was rendered before the reglamentary 
period to answer had expired. 
c. Defendant was unreasonably deprived of his day in court. 
NB: AoM are required only in MNT not in M/R 
PRO-FROMA MOTION- one w/c does not comply with the requirements under Rule 37. 
-pleading that has the form but no substance. 
Effect: Pro Forma Motion for new trial or reconsideration shall not toll the 
realementaru period of Appeal. 
GROUNDS FOR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DED) 
1. Damages awarded are excessive 
2. Evidence is insufficient to justify the decision or final order 
3. Decision or final order is contrary to law. 
-Court could modify or alter a judgment even after the same has been executory WHENEVER 
circumstances transpire rendering its decision unjust and inequitable 
PERIOD TO RESOLVE MNT or M/R- “30 days” from the time it is submitted for resolution. 
NB: There can be second motion for new trial but NO second Motion for Reconsideration (Reason: 
All litigation must come to an end at some point) 
EFFECT of granting MNT: Original judgment/ final order be vacated and action shall stand 
for trial de novo. 
-Relaxation of Rules of Court not possible if no valid justification. 
EFFECT of order for PARTIAL NEW TRIAL: When less than all of the issues are ordered 
RETRIED, court may either (a) ENTER judgment or final order as to the rest (b) STAY the 
enforcement of such judgment or final order until after the new trial. 
REMEDY: against order denying MNT or M/R -APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OR FINAL 
ORDER
RULE 38 
RELIEF FROM JUDGMENTS ORDERS, OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS 
Petition for Relief- is a legal remedy whereby a party seeks to set aside a judgment rendered 
against him by court whenever he was unjustly deprived of a hearing or was prevented from 
taking an Appeal in either case because of FAME. 
- In effect, it is a second opportunity for an aggrieved party to ask for new trial. (Sayman vs. CA) 
PRFJ- Applicable to all kinds of Special Proceedings 
Intestate Settlement, Guardianship Proceedings, Land Registration 
When and How Filed: - a verified petition for relief must be filed w/in 60 days after petitioner 
learns of the judgment, final order, or “o th e r proceeding” (includes an order or writ of execution, 
order dismissing an appeal) to be set aside and not more than 6 months after such judgment 
or final order has been entered or such proceeding has been taken. 
-must be accompanied with affidavit of merit alleging the grounds below. 
GROUNDS: 
1. FAME (Heavy workload not a ground for excusable negligence (LBP vs. Eli GC 
Natividad. et a l ) 
2. Existence of a good and substantial cause of action or defense. 
-ABSENCE of AoM is a fatal defect and warrants the denial of the petition. 
Two periods for the filing of a petition for relief are not extendible and never interrupted 
1. 60 day period- reckoned from time party acquired knowledge of O/J/P 
2. 6-month period-computed from date of entry of order or judgment in the book of entries 
NOT from the date of order of default or the rendition of finality of judgment. 
REMEDY: Denial of Petition for Relief from Judgment (PRFJ) or an order disallowing or 
dismissing an appeal may only be challenged through Special Civil Action of Certiorari under 
Rule 65. (Cross Reference-Rule 41, Sec. 1 par b interlocutory, and last par of same rule) 
Interlocutory: Petition for Relief from the order of Default, Order denying an M/R of the default 
order. (Not Appealable) 
-BUT an order seeking to set aside the order of default is final and therefore appealable 
COURT ISSUES ODER TO FILE AN ANSWER-If PRFJ is sufficient in form and in substance, 
adverse parties file their answer within 15 days from the receipt thereof. (Order +copy of 
petition+AOM) 
-FAILURE to file an answer does not constitute DEFAULT, even w/out an answer, the court will 
still have to hear the petition and determine its merits. 
2 HEARINGS IN A PETITION FOR RELIEF 
1. Hearing to determine whether J/O/P should be set aside 
2. In the affirmative, hearing on the merits of the case.

More Related Content

What's hot

Special Proceedings under Atty. Tiofilo Villanueva
Special Proceedings under Atty. Tiofilo VillanuevaSpecial Proceedings under Atty. Tiofilo Villanueva
Special Proceedings under Atty. Tiofilo VillanuevaLawrence Villamar
 
DOJ National Prosecution Service Manual
DOJ National Prosecution Service ManualDOJ National Prosecution Service Manual
DOJ National Prosecution Service ManualHarve Abella
 
72467085 evidence-reviewer-prof-san-pedro
72467085 evidence-reviewer-prof-san-pedro72467085 evidence-reviewer-prof-san-pedro
72467085 evidence-reviewer-prof-san-pedroshireen30
 
2022 Preweek Reviewer in Labor Law by Dean Poquiz.pdf
2022 Preweek Reviewer in Labor Law  by Dean Poquiz.pdf2022 Preweek Reviewer in Labor Law  by Dean Poquiz.pdf
2022 Preweek Reviewer in Labor Law by Dean Poquiz.pdfMariaKatrinaSales
 
Affidavit of undertaking
Affidavit of undertakingAffidavit of undertaking
Affidavit of undertakingWolf Oversoul
 
Rule 76: ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILL
Rule 76: ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILLRule 76: ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILL
Rule 76: ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILLlspujurists
 
Rule 74 SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES
Rule 74 SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATESRule 74 SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES
Rule 74 SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATESlspujurists
 
Rule 109 appeals in special proceedings
Rule 109 appeals in special proceedingsRule 109 appeals in special proceedings
Rule 109 appeals in special proceedingsjayrushidsancon
 
KATARUNGANG-PAMBARANGAY (1).ppt
KATARUNGANG-PAMBARANGAY (1).pptKATARUNGANG-PAMBARANGAY (1).ppt
KATARUNGANG-PAMBARANGAY (1).pptryanlestertan
 
Jurat example
Jurat exampleJurat example
Jurat exampleattyakc
 
Rule 123 125 procedure in courts (MTC, COURT OF APPEALS & SUPREME COURT)
Rule 123 125 procedure in courts (MTC, COURT OF APPEALS & SUPREME COURT)Rule 123 125 procedure in courts (MTC, COURT OF APPEALS & SUPREME COURT)
Rule 123 125 procedure in courts (MTC, COURT OF APPEALS & SUPREME COURT)Cheldy S, Elumba-Pableo
 

What's hot (20)

Rule 117 motion to quash
Rule 117 motion to quashRule 117 motion to quash
Rule 117 motion to quash
 
Rule 114 bail
Rule 114 bailRule 114 bail
Rule 114 bail
 
Katarungang Pambarangay
Katarungang PambarangayKatarungang Pambarangay
Katarungang Pambarangay
 
Criminal procedure
Criminal  procedureCriminal  procedure
Criminal procedure
 
Special Proceedings under Atty. Tiofilo Villanueva
Special Proceedings under Atty. Tiofilo VillanuevaSpecial Proceedings under Atty. Tiofilo Villanueva
Special Proceedings under Atty. Tiofilo Villanueva
 
DOJ National Prosecution Service Manual
DOJ National Prosecution Service ManualDOJ National Prosecution Service Manual
DOJ National Prosecution Service Manual
 
Preliminary Investigation
Preliminary InvestigationPreliminary Investigation
Preliminary Investigation
 
72467085 evidence-reviewer-prof-san-pedro
72467085 evidence-reviewer-prof-san-pedro72467085 evidence-reviewer-prof-san-pedro
72467085 evidence-reviewer-prof-san-pedro
 
2022 Preweek Reviewer in Labor Law by Dean Poquiz.pdf
2022 Preweek Reviewer in Labor Law  by Dean Poquiz.pdf2022 Preweek Reviewer in Labor Law  by Dean Poquiz.pdf
2022 Preweek Reviewer in Labor Law by Dean Poquiz.pdf
 
Affidavit of undertaking
Affidavit of undertakingAffidavit of undertaking
Affidavit of undertaking
 
Rule 76: ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILL
Rule 76: ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILLRule 76: ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILL
Rule 76: ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF WILL
 
The revised rules of criminal procedure
The revised rules of criminal procedureThe revised rules of criminal procedure
The revised rules of criminal procedure
 
Rule 74 SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES
Rule 74 SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATESRule 74 SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES
Rule 74 SUMMARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES
 
Rule 118 pre trial conference
Rule 118 pre trial conferenceRule 118 pre trial conference
Rule 118 pre trial conference
 
Rule 109 appeals in special proceedings
Rule 109 appeals in special proceedingsRule 109 appeals in special proceedings
Rule 109 appeals in special proceedings
 
KATARUNGANG-PAMBARANGAY (1).ppt
KATARUNGANG-PAMBARANGAY (1).pptKATARUNGANG-PAMBARANGAY (1).ppt
KATARUNGANG-PAMBARANGAY (1).ppt
 
Jurat example
Jurat exampleJurat example
Jurat example
 
Rule 123 125 procedure in courts (MTC, COURT OF APPEALS & SUPREME COURT)
Rule 123 125 procedure in courts (MTC, COURT OF APPEALS & SUPREME COURT)Rule 123 125 procedure in courts (MTC, COURT OF APPEALS & SUPREME COURT)
Rule 123 125 procedure in courts (MTC, COURT OF APPEALS & SUPREME COURT)
 
Adverse claim
Adverse claimAdverse claim
Adverse claim
 
Political Law Bar Questions Guide
Political Law Bar Questions GuidePolitical Law Bar Questions Guide
Political Law Bar Questions Guide
 

Similar to Remedial Law Rule 37 38

Remedial Law Rule 9 effect of failure to plead
Remedial Law Rule 9 effect of failure to pleadRemedial Law Rule 9 effect of failure to plead
Remedial Law Rule 9 effect of failure to pleadLawrence Villamar
 
Postdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdf
Postdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdfPostdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdf
Postdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdfElaDwynCordova
 
Administrative procedure
Administrative procedureAdministrative procedure
Administrative procedureMai Sar
 
Remedial Law Rule 58 estopia notes part2
Remedial Law Rule 58  estopia notes part2Remedial Law Rule 58  estopia notes part2
Remedial Law Rule 58 estopia notes part2Lawrence Villamar
 
Injunction + interim order notes.Power point
Injunction + interim order notes.Power pointInjunction + interim order notes.Power point
Injunction + interim order notes.Power pointssuser32bd0c
 
Appeals and adjudication under fema
Appeals and adjudication under femaAppeals and adjudication under fema
Appeals and adjudication under femaDVSResearchFoundatio
 
Procedure of appeal from high court to court of appeal
Procedure of appeal from high court to court of appeal Procedure of appeal from high court to court of appeal
Procedure of appeal from high court to court of appeal ilyana iskandar
 
Summary proceedingS- An Overview
Summary proceedingS- An OverviewSummary proceedingS- An Overview
Summary proceedingS- An OverviewPriyanka Agarwal
 
ARBITRATION: NEED OF THE HOUR
ARBITRATION: NEED OF THE HOUR ARBITRATION: NEED OF THE HOUR
ARBITRATION: NEED OF THE HOUR ShubhamBudhiraja3
 
PLMichaelson-Emerg-Arb(ABA-JustResolutions-03-2016)(final-complete)
PLMichaelson-Emerg-Arb(ABA-JustResolutions-03-2016)(final-complete)PLMichaelson-Emerg-Arb(ABA-JustResolutions-03-2016)(final-complete)
PLMichaelson-Emerg-Arb(ABA-JustResolutions-03-2016)(final-complete)Peter Michaelson
 
Advance Ruling
Advance RulingAdvance Ruling
Advance Rulingprateek
 
Cpc learning module 6 suit in particular cases
Cpc learning module 6 suit in particular casesCpc learning module 6 suit in particular cases
Cpc learning module 6 suit in particular casesDr. Vikas Khakare
 
Enforcement of Arbitral Award
Enforcement of Arbitral AwardEnforcement of Arbitral Award
Enforcement of Arbitral AwardAsha Saxena
 
O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908
O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908
O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908AMITY UNIVERSITY RAJASTHAN
 
Administrative remedies
Administrative remediesAdministrative remedies
Administrative remediesmarinelle25
 
Domestic enquiry-procedure-ppt-industrial-relations
Domestic enquiry-procedure-ppt-industrial-relationsDomestic enquiry-procedure-ppt-industrial-relations
Domestic enquiry-procedure-ppt-industrial-relationsSameer Sayyad
 

Similar to Remedial Law Rule 37 38 (20)

Rule 37 38-41
Rule 37 38-41Rule 37 38-41
Rule 37 38-41
 
Remedial Law Rule 9 effect of failure to plead
Remedial Law Rule 9 effect of failure to pleadRemedial Law Rule 9 effect of failure to plead
Remedial Law Rule 9 effect of failure to plead
 
Postdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdf
Postdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdfPostdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdf
Postdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdf
 
Administrative procedure
Administrative procedureAdministrative procedure
Administrative procedure
 
Remedial Law Rule 58 estopia notes part2
Remedial Law Rule 58  estopia notes part2Remedial Law Rule 58  estopia notes part2
Remedial Law Rule 58 estopia notes part2
 
Injunction + interim order notes.Power point
Injunction + interim order notes.Power pointInjunction + interim order notes.Power point
Injunction + interim order notes.Power point
 
Appeals and adjudication under fema
Appeals and adjudication under femaAppeals and adjudication under fema
Appeals and adjudication under fema
 
Procedure of appeal from high court to court of appeal
Procedure of appeal from high court to court of appeal Procedure of appeal from high court to court of appeal
Procedure of appeal from high court to court of appeal
 
Summary proceedingS- An Overview
Summary proceedingS- An OverviewSummary proceedingS- An Overview
Summary proceedingS- An Overview
 
ARBITRATION: NEED OF THE HOUR
ARBITRATION: NEED OF THE HOUR ARBITRATION: NEED OF THE HOUR
ARBITRATION: NEED OF THE HOUR
 
PLMichaelson-Emerg-Arb(ABA-JustResolutions-03-2016)(final-complete)
PLMichaelson-Emerg-Arb(ABA-JustResolutions-03-2016)(final-complete)PLMichaelson-Emerg-Arb(ABA-JustResolutions-03-2016)(final-complete)
PLMichaelson-Emerg-Arb(ABA-JustResolutions-03-2016)(final-complete)
 
Advance Ruling
Advance RulingAdvance Ruling
Advance Ruling
 
Cpc learning module 6 suit in particular cases
Cpc learning module 6 suit in particular casesCpc learning module 6 suit in particular cases
Cpc learning module 6 suit in particular cases
 
Enforcement of Arbitral Award
Enforcement of Arbitral AwardEnforcement of Arbitral Award
Enforcement of Arbitral Award
 
O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908
O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908
O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908
 
Administrative remedies
Administrative remediesAdministrative remedies
Administrative remedies
 
Domestic enquiry-procedure-ppt-industrial-relations
Domestic enquiry-procedure-ppt-industrial-relationsDomestic enquiry-procedure-ppt-industrial-relations
Domestic enquiry-procedure-ppt-industrial-relations
 
Case strategy
Case strategyCase strategy
Case strategy
 
Peeda act
Peeda actPeeda act
Peeda act
 
Peeda act
Peeda actPeeda act
Peeda act
 

More from Lawrence Villamar

Dealing with Negative Online Publicity
Dealing with Negative Online PublicityDealing with Negative Online Publicity
Dealing with Negative Online PublicityLawrence Villamar
 
Freedom of Information for Local Government Units
Freedom of Information for Local Government UnitsFreedom of Information for Local Government Units
Freedom of Information for Local Government UnitsLawrence Villamar
 
Villamar Law Office - San Jose, Occidental Mindoro
Villamar Law Office - San Jose, Occidental Mindoro Villamar Law Office - San Jose, Occidental Mindoro
Villamar Law Office - San Jose, Occidental Mindoro Lawrence Villamar
 
Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000
Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000
Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000Lawrence Villamar
 
HowtoPresentAnswersinBarExaminationLawSchoolExam (1)
HowtoPresentAnswersinBarExaminationLawSchoolExam (1)HowtoPresentAnswersinBarExaminationLawSchoolExam (1)
HowtoPresentAnswersinBarExaminationLawSchoolExam (1)Lawrence Villamar
 
Scaling Your News Site to 30 Million Page Views
Scaling Your News Site to 30 Million Page ViewsScaling Your News Site to 30 Million Page Views
Scaling Your News Site to 30 Million Page ViewsLawrence Villamar
 
Outline for Negotiable Instruments Law (Bar Exam 2015)
Outline for Negotiable Instruments Law (Bar Exam 2015)Outline for Negotiable Instruments Law (Bar Exam 2015)
Outline for Negotiable Instruments Law (Bar Exam 2015)Lawrence Villamar
 
Criminal law jurisprudence ticman jr (2015)
Criminal law jurisprudence ticman jr (2015)Criminal law jurisprudence ticman jr (2015)
Criminal law jurisprudence ticman jr (2015)Lawrence Villamar
 
Esguerra Lecture on Top 25 Criminal Law Bar Topics (1979-2007)
Esguerra Lecture on Top 25 Criminal Law Bar Topics (1979-2007)Esguerra Lecture on Top 25 Criminal Law Bar Topics (1979-2007)
Esguerra Lecture on Top 25 Criminal Law Bar Topics (1979-2007)Lawrence Villamar
 
Remedial Law Rule 58 estopia notes part1
Remedial Law Rule 58  estopia notes part1Remedial Law Rule 58  estopia notes part1
Remedial Law Rule 58 estopia notes part1Lawrence Villamar
 
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopiaRemedial Law Rule 45 estopia
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopiaLawrence Villamar
 
Remedial Law Rule 65 estopia
Remedial Law Rule 65 estopia Remedial Law Rule 65 estopia
Remedial Law Rule 65 estopia Lawrence Villamar
 
Remedial Law Rule 62 interpleader
Remedial Law Rule 62 interpleaderRemedial Law Rule 62 interpleader
Remedial Law Rule 62 interpleaderLawrence Villamar
 
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia pdf
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia pdfRemedial Law Rule 45 estopia pdf
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia pdfLawrence Villamar
 

More from Lawrence Villamar (20)

2018 Mandanas Ruling
2018 Mandanas Ruling2018 Mandanas Ruling
2018 Mandanas Ruling
 
Philippine Cyber-Libel
Philippine Cyber-LibelPhilippine Cyber-Libel
Philippine Cyber-Libel
 
Dealing with Negative Online Publicity
Dealing with Negative Online PublicityDealing with Negative Online Publicity
Dealing with Negative Online Publicity
 
Freedom of Information for Local Government Units
Freedom of Information for Local Government UnitsFreedom of Information for Local Government Units
Freedom of Information for Local Government Units
 
Villamar Law Office - San Jose, Occidental Mindoro
Villamar Law Office - San Jose, Occidental Mindoro Villamar Law Office - San Jose, Occidental Mindoro
Villamar Law Office - San Jose, Occidental Mindoro
 
Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000
Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000
Retail Trade Liberalization Act of 2000
 
HowtoPresentAnswersinBarExaminationLawSchoolExam (1)
HowtoPresentAnswersinBarExaminationLawSchoolExam (1)HowtoPresentAnswersinBarExaminationLawSchoolExam (1)
HowtoPresentAnswersinBarExaminationLawSchoolExam (1)
 
Scaling Your News Site to 30 Million Page Views
Scaling Your News Site to 30 Million Page ViewsScaling Your News Site to 30 Million Page Views
Scaling Your News Site to 30 Million Page Views
 
Outline for Negotiable Instruments Law (Bar Exam 2015)
Outline for Negotiable Instruments Law (Bar Exam 2015)Outline for Negotiable Instruments Law (Bar Exam 2015)
Outline for Negotiable Instruments Law (Bar Exam 2015)
 
Criminal law jurisprudence ticman jr (2015)
Criminal law jurisprudence ticman jr (2015)Criminal law jurisprudence ticman jr (2015)
Criminal law jurisprudence ticman jr (2015)
 
Esguerra Lecture on Top 25 Criminal Law Bar Topics (1979-2007)
Esguerra Lecture on Top 25 Criminal Law Bar Topics (1979-2007)Esguerra Lecture on Top 25 Criminal Law Bar Topics (1979-2007)
Esguerra Lecture on Top 25 Criminal Law Bar Topics (1979-2007)
 
Rule 23
Rule 23Rule 23
Rule 23
 
Remedial Law Rule 3
Remedial Law Rule 3Remedial Law Rule 3
Remedial Law Rule 3
 
Remedial Law Rule 14
Remedial Law Rule 14Remedial Law Rule 14
Remedial Law Rule 14
 
Remedial Law Rule 58 estopia notes part1
Remedial Law Rule 58  estopia notes part1Remedial Law Rule 58  estopia notes part1
Remedial Law Rule 58 estopia notes part1
 
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopiaRemedial Law Rule 45 estopia
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia
 
Remedial Law Rule 65 estopia
Remedial Law Rule 65 estopia Remedial Law Rule 65 estopia
Remedial Law Rule 65 estopia
 
Remedial Law Rule 62 interpleader
Remedial Law Rule 62 interpleaderRemedial Law Rule 62 interpleader
Remedial Law Rule 62 interpleader
 
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia pdf
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia pdfRemedial Law Rule 45 estopia pdf
Remedial Law Rule 45 estopia pdf
 
Remedial Law Rule 68 69
Remedial Law Rule 68 69Remedial Law Rule 68 69
Remedial Law Rule 68 69
 

Recently uploaded

Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)Mike Keyes
 
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quizAgrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quizgaelcabigunda
 
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law student
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law studentindian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law student
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law studentAaruKhanduri
 
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of JusticeBook review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justiceanvithaav
 
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdfGoodman Estate Law
 
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptx
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxPRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptx
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
 
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.docNotes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.docBRELGOSIMAT
 
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of lawsApplication of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of lawsanvithaav
 
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Society
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on SocietyTypes of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Society
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Societynanjeebarifa
 
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...AvinashMittal5
 
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptx
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxDNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptx
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
 
Chambers Global Practice Guide - Corporate M&A 2024 - Canadian M&A
Chambers Global Practice Guide - Corporate M&A 2024 - Canadian M&AChambers Global Practice Guide - Corporate M&A 2024 - Canadian M&A
Chambers Global Practice Guide - Corporate M&A 2024 - Canadian M&ASkyLaw Professional Corporation
 
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South AfricaSolidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South AfricaUniversity of Ferrara
 
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...Dr. Oliver Massmann
 
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdfALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
 
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptx
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxRIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptx
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
 

Recently uploaded (18)

Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
Casa Tradicion v. Casa Azul Spirits (S.D. Tex. 2024)
 
Justice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
Justice Advocates Legal Defence FirmJustice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
Justice Advocates Legal Defence Firm
 
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quizAgrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
Agrarian Reform Policies in the Philippines: a quiz
 
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law student
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law studentindian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law student
indian evidence act.pdf.......very helpful for law student
 
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of JusticeBook review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice
Book review - Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice
 
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf
7 Basic Steps of Trust Administration.pdf
 
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptx
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxPRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptx
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptx
 
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.docNotes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
Notes-on-Prescription-Obligations-and-Contracts.doc
 
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of lawsApplication of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
Application of Doctrine of Renvoi by foreign courts under conflict of laws
 
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Society
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on SocietyTypes of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Society
Types of Cybercrime and Its Impact on Society
 
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
Everything You Should Know About Child Custody and Parenting While Living in ...
 
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptx
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxDNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptx
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptx
 
Chambers Global Practice Guide - Corporate M&A 2024 - Canadian M&A
Chambers Global Practice Guide - Corporate M&A 2024 - Canadian M&AChambers Global Practice Guide - Corporate M&A 2024 - Canadian M&A
Chambers Global Practice Guide - Corporate M&A 2024 - Canadian M&A
 
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South AfricaSolidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
Solidarity and Taxation: the Ubuntu approach in South Africa
 
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
 
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdfALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf
 
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptx
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxRIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptx
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptx
 
Charge and its essentials rules Under the CRPC, 1898
Charge and its essentials rules Under the CRPC, 1898Charge and its essentials rules Under the CRPC, 1898
Charge and its essentials rules Under the CRPC, 1898
 

Remedial Law Rule 37 38

  • 1. RULE 37 MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION -filed within the period for taking an Appeal. To WARRANT a new trial, the newly discovered evidence: 1. Must have been discovered after trial 2. Could not have been discovered and produced at the trial despite reasonable diligence 3. If presented, would probably alter the result of the action GROUNDS FOR MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL 1. FAME which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against and by reason of which such aggrieved party has probably been impaired in his rights. 2. Newly discovered evidence w/c if presented would probably alter the result. 3. Extrinsic or Collateral Fraud-fraud w/c prevents the aggrieved party from having a trial or presenting his case to the court, or was used to procure the judgment without fair submission of the controversy Intrinsic Fraud-refers to acts of a party at the trial w/c prevented a fair and just determination of the case. M ista ke-one w/c ordinary prudence could not have guarded against. Excusable Nealiaence-one w/c ordinary diligence and prudence could not have guarded against and by reason of w/c the rights of an aggrieved party have been probably impaired. TEST o f EXCUSABLE NEGLIGENCE-whether a party acted with ordinary prudence while transacting important business. MNT-must be supported by affidavit of merits, w/c should state facts and not mere opinions or conclusions of law (required only if the grounds relied upon are FAME) AoM may be dispensed with if: a. Judgment is null and void (court has no jurisdiction over the defendant or subject matter. b. Procedurally defective- Judgment by default was rendered before the reglamentary period to answer had expired. c. Defendant was unreasonably deprived of his day in court. NB: AoM are required only in MNT not in M/R PRO-FROMA MOTION- one w/c does not comply with the requirements under Rule 37. -pleading that has the form but no substance. Effect: Pro Forma Motion for new trial or reconsideration shall not toll the realementaru period of Appeal. GROUNDS FOR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DED) 1. Damages awarded are excessive 2. Evidence is insufficient to justify the decision or final order 3. Decision or final order is contrary to law. -Court could modify or alter a judgment even after the same has been executory WHENEVER circumstances transpire rendering its decision unjust and inequitable PERIOD TO RESOLVE MNT or M/R- “30 days” from the time it is submitted for resolution. NB: There can be second motion for new trial but NO second Motion for Reconsideration (Reason: All litigation must come to an end at some point) EFFECT of granting MNT: Original judgment/ final order be vacated and action shall stand for trial de novo. -Relaxation of Rules of Court not possible if no valid justification. EFFECT of order for PARTIAL NEW TRIAL: When less than all of the issues are ordered RETRIED, court may either (a) ENTER judgment or final order as to the rest (b) STAY the enforcement of such judgment or final order until after the new trial. REMEDY: against order denying MNT or M/R -APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OR FINAL ORDER
  • 2. RULE 38 RELIEF FROM JUDGMENTS ORDERS, OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS Petition for Relief- is a legal remedy whereby a party seeks to set aside a judgment rendered against him by court whenever he was unjustly deprived of a hearing or was prevented from taking an Appeal in either case because of FAME. - In effect, it is a second opportunity for an aggrieved party to ask for new trial. (Sayman vs. CA) PRFJ- Applicable to all kinds of Special Proceedings Intestate Settlement, Guardianship Proceedings, Land Registration When and How Filed: - a verified petition for relief must be filed w/in 60 days after petitioner learns of the judgment, final order, or “o th e r proceeding” (includes an order or writ of execution, order dismissing an appeal) to be set aside and not more than 6 months after such judgment or final order has been entered or such proceeding has been taken. -must be accompanied with affidavit of merit alleging the grounds below. GROUNDS: 1. FAME (Heavy workload not a ground for excusable negligence (LBP vs. Eli GC Natividad. et a l ) 2. Existence of a good and substantial cause of action or defense. -ABSENCE of AoM is a fatal defect and warrants the denial of the petition. Two periods for the filing of a petition for relief are not extendible and never interrupted 1. 60 day period- reckoned from time party acquired knowledge of O/J/P 2. 6-month period-computed from date of entry of order or judgment in the book of entries NOT from the date of order of default or the rendition of finality of judgment. REMEDY: Denial of Petition for Relief from Judgment (PRFJ) or an order disallowing or dismissing an appeal may only be challenged through Special Civil Action of Certiorari under Rule 65. (Cross Reference-Rule 41, Sec. 1 par b interlocutory, and last par of same rule) Interlocutory: Petition for Relief from the order of Default, Order denying an M/R of the default order. (Not Appealable) -BUT an order seeking to set aside the order of default is final and therefore appealable COURT ISSUES ODER TO FILE AN ANSWER-If PRFJ is sufficient in form and in substance, adverse parties file their answer within 15 days from the receipt thereof. (Order +copy of petition+AOM) -FAILURE to file an answer does not constitute DEFAULT, even w/out an answer, the court will still have to hear the petition and determine its merits. 2 HEARINGS IN A PETITION FOR RELIEF 1. Hearing to determine whether J/O/P should be set aside 2. In the affirmative, hearing on the merits of the case.