Rubric for Article Review APA Cover 5/5 point Your name and date Header with page number Introductory Paragraph 5/5 points 1. Author’s Thesis Discuss the author’s thesis. Include article and author name in this paragraph. (if more than one article, include them both) 2. The Facts 20/20 points Discuss three important facts the author uses to support thesis. Explain or correlate the facts with facts from course content. Use in text citations from course reading so show connections to this article. Evaluate the resources provided with the article. Are there resources provided with the article? Are they recent? Body- minimum of 4 fully developed paragraphs This should be a bulk of the report. 3. Strengths /weaknesses/discussion to the profession 40/40 points. Describe the strengths of the information presented as it applies to the professions. Critically evaluate the information in the article. 4. Is there bias or faulty reasoning? Evaluate the information for truth. Bring in outside sources to support your analysis and review. What are others saying about the same topic? Do they agree or is there conflicting information. Draw conclusions. You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning. Conclusion 5. Conclusions 10/10 points Provide concluding remarks regarding your review/evaluation of the article. 6. APA Format 10/10 points in text # of references Reference page 7. Overall presentation 10/10 points formatting wording person tense Comments/Reasons for Deductions: Total 100/100 PAGE 1 Week 3- Article Review DUE: Feb 23, 2020 11:59 PM Grade Details Grade N/A Gradebook Comments None Assignment Details Open Date Feb 3, 2020 12:05 AM Graded? Yes Points Possible 100.0 Resubmissions Allowed? Yes Remaining Submissions 3 Attachments checked for originality? Yes Top of Form Assignment Instructions Paper - Find two peer reviewed articles in library about ethics in your discipline or ethics in research and discuss the positions of the authors. Assignment Instructions Instructions: Select two appropriate articles for review to complete the assignment. Write a review using the instructions below. This paper should be a minimum of 1000 words.  Write in APA format.  Include cover page, body with in text citations & reference list.   Select two Articles Locate two peer-reviewed article (related to the ethics) published within the last 3 years in a peer-reviewed journal from the online library, then present an assessment comprising of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the article. First synthesize the position of the authors. Then, evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the information presented in the article for truth. Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning. What are others are.

1. Rubric for Article Review
APA
Cover
5/5 point
Your name and date
Header with page number
Introductory Paragraph
5/5 points

2. 1. Author’s Thesis
Discuss the author’s thesis. Include article and author name
in this paragraph. (if more than one article, include them both)
2. The Facts
20/20 points
Discuss three important facts the author uses to support thesis.
Explain or correlate the facts with facts from course content.
Use in text citations from course reading so show connections
to this article.
Evaluate the resources provided with the article.

3. Are there resources provided with the article? Are they recent?
Body- minimum of 4 fully developed paragraphs
This should be a bulk of the report.
3. Strengths /weaknesses/discussion to the profession
40/40 points.
Describe the strengths of the information presented as it applies
to the
professions. Critically evaluate the information in the article.
4. Is there bias or faulty reasoning? Evaluate the information
for truth.
Bring in outside sources to support your analysis and review.
What are others saying about the same topic? Do they agree or
is there conflicting information.
Draw conclusions.
You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning.
Conclusion
5. Conclusions

4. 10/10 points
Provide concluding remarks regarding your
review/evaluation of the article.
6. APA Format
10/10 points
in text
# of references
Reference page

5. 7. Overall presentation
10/10 points
formatting
wording
person
tense
Comments/Reasons for Deductions:
Total

6. 100/100
PAGE
1
Week 3- Article Review
DUE: Feb 23, 2020 11:59 PM
Grade Details
Grade
N/A
Gradebook Comments
None
Assignment Details
Open Date
Feb 3, 2020 12:05 AM
Graded?
Yes
Points Possible
100.0
Resubmissions Allowed?
Yes
Remaining Submissions
3
Attachments checked for originality?
Yes
Top of Form
Assignment Instructions
Paper - Find two peer reviewed articles in library about ethics
in your discipline or ethics in research and discuss the positions
of the authors.
Assignment Instructions
Instructions: Select two appropriate articles for review to
complete the assignment. Write a review using the instructions
below. This paper should be a minimum of 1000 words. Write
in APA format. Include cover page, body with in text citations

7. & reference list.
Select two Articles
Locate two peer-reviewed article (related to the ethics)
published within the last 3 years in a peer-reviewed journal
from the online library, then present an assessment comprising
of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the
article. First synthesize the position of the authors. Then,
evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the
information presented in the article for truth.
Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of
both fact and faulty reasoning.
What are others are both author's saying the same topic? Do
they agree or is there conflicting information.
Draw conclusions.
This assignment has many benefits. First, it requires a search of
indexing and abstracting databases from the online library to
find an article that meets the specified criteria (must be related
to ethics). It also emphasizes what a scholarly article is; to
discern between scholarly and non-scholarly writing; to
condense someone else's lengthy argument into a concise report;
to think critically about what has been read by assessing the
strengths and weaknesses of the research; and, thus, to become
participants in the discussions regarding the topic at hand.
FYI: Wikipedia is not an acceptable resource for academic
writing. Please use the university library for reference. Articles
must be peer-reviewed.
View the attachment below to see how points will be allocated
for this assignment.
Bottom of Form