The document summarizes the results of a STaR Chart assessment conducted at Cypress Ridge school. It shows that the school scored in the developing or advanced categories in most key areas over a three year period. While scores have been consistent in teaching and learning and infrastructure, scores decreased in educator preparation and development. The summary identifies three areas for improvement: educator preparation and development, leadership/administration budgeting and planning, and increasing student access to and differentiation of classroom technology. It concludes that STaR Chart data is used to drive teaching/learning and advance education, and that Cypress Ridge is on a successful path overall.

1. STaR Chart

2.  Purpose of STaR Chart
 Four Key Areas
 STaR Chart Classification Comparison
 Trends
 Our Focus Areas
 Summary
 Resources
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 2

3.  Create & Design Campus Technology Plan
 Measure Student and Teacher Technology
Proficiency
 Prioritize District Budgeting and Funding
 Set Benchmarks, Goals, and Assessments
 Long Range Plan for Technology
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 3

4.  Four Key Areas
1. Teaching & Learning
2. Educator Preparation
& Development
3. Administration &
Support
4. Infrastructure for
Technology
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 4

5.  Key Area Total of 6-8 = Early Tech
 Key Area Total of 9-14 = Developing Tech
 Key Area Total of 15-20 = Advanced Tech
 Key Area Total of 21-24 = Target Tech
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 5

6. Key Area Totals of the Past 3 Years
12
Teaching and Learning 13
12
12
Educator Preparation and Development 14
12
Leadership, Administration, & 11
10
Instructional Support 10
14
Infrastructure for Technology 14
12
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
2008-09 2007-08 2006-07
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 6

7. •Scores are consistent.
Teaching and Learning •Online learning has remained constant.
•Constant across 3 years.
•Significant decreased since 2007-2008.
Educator Preparation and •Sub-category score of 2 is consistent.
Development
•Decrease in PD modeling, online learning, and
experiences.
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 7

8. •Slight increase in total score since 2006-07.
Leadership,
Administration, and •Increase in support and leadership vision .
Instructional Support
•Budget score is consistently at 2.
•Significant increase in total score since 2006-07.
Infrastructure for •LAN and WAN has improved.
Technology
•Other classroom technology score remains at 2.
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 8

9.  Focus on Teaching and
Learning
1. Patterns of Classroom
Interactions
2. Frequency/Design of
Instructional Setting
3. Content Area
Connections
4. Online Learning
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 9

10.  Focus on Educator Preparation and Development
 Focus on Leadership, Administration, & Support
1. Budgeting
2. Planning
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 10

11.  Infrastructure for Technology
1. Increase Student Access on
Computers
2. Differentiated Classroom
Technology
3. Local Area Network &
Wide Area Network
4. Distance Learning Capacity
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 11

12.  STaRChart data drives
teaching and learning.
 STaRChart data moves
education towards the
future.
 CypressRidge is on a
successful path.
 Need to improve in 3
areas.
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 12

13. Online
http://starchart.esc12.net/
Cypress Ridge STaR Chart Results 11/29/2009 13