"Extended Producer Responsibility: International Experiences" (Responsabilité élargie du producteur: Expériences internationales) Intervention présentée par "Cyclos GmbH/ Envero GmbH " à l'occasion du "Jeudi des Déchets" le 22 février 2018
ECOGESTUS Lda Consultor joão vaz ECOVALOR o caso alemão _enJoao Vaz
Germany has a large recycling industry that employs many people and contributes significantly to reducing CO2 emissions. However, since ending DSD's monopoly on packaging waste management in 2005, there have been issues with transparency, incentives for reusable packaging, and the rise of unlicensed operators not paying fees. While Germany recycles and recovers a high percentage of its municipal and commercial waste, it has failed to meet reusable packaging targets. The system is now trying to improve with a new single-bin approach and better sorting facilities, but critics argue it needs more transparency and policies to encourage truly sustainable packaging.
This document provides an overview of waste prevention programs in the EU. It defines waste prevention and outlines the EEA's activities in reviewing member countries' waste prevention programs. As of February 2014, 20 countries had published waste prevention programs, which differ in whether they are separate programs or part of wider waste management plans. The programs address various sectors and waste types, with some having quantitative targets and others qualitative targets or status quo goals. Instruments used range from informative to promotional to administrative to economic. Stakeholder involvement also varies. Little information is given on costs or cost savings of the programs. Overall, the programs differ substantially and experience implementing them is still limited.
The EU FLEGT Action Plan aims to curb illegal logging by promoting sustainable and legal timber trade between the EU and producer countries. It establishes Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) that require producer countries to demonstrate legally-sourced timber using a Legality Assurance System that tracks timber sources. The plan also encourages sustainable procurement policies and regulates illegally sourced timber imports into the EU through the EU Timber Regulation.
The document discusses EU research and innovation activities within the Horizon 2020 and LIFE programs managed by the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME). It provides an overview of the programs, including funding amounts and relevant topics in areas like the circular economy and nutrient recovery. Examples of funded projects are also described. Looking ahead, it announces upcoming calls for proposals and opportunities to get involved as an independent expert.
Slides from the 2nd day of the European Nutrient Event, 19 october 2017, Basel: http://www.nweurope.eu/projects/project-search/phos4you-phosphorus-recovery-from-waste-water-for-your-life/
More information on www.phosphorusplatform.eu/R&D
European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP)
www.phosphorusplatform.eu
Sustainable management of nutrients is crucial for agriculture, food, industry, water and the environment. ESPP brings together companies and stakeholders to address the Phosphorus Challenge and its opportunities for the circular economy.
Countries:
Austria AT
Belgium BE
Bulgaria BG
Cyprus CY
Czech Republic CZ
Germany DE
Denmark DK
Estonia EE
Spain ES
Finland FI
France FR
Greece EL
Hungary HU
Ireland IE
Italy IT
Lithuania LT
Luxembourg LU
Latvia LV
Malta MT
Netherlands NL
Poland PL
Portugal PT
Romania RO
Sweden SE
Slovenia SI
Slovakia SK
United Kingdom UK
Switzerland CH
Phosphorus:
Fosfor
Fosfor
Fòsfòr
Фосфор
Fosfor
Фосфор
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosforas
Fosfors
Fuosfuors
Fosfor
Ffуsfforws
Fosfar
Fosfaras
Fosfaar
Fosforus
Φωσφορος
Ֆոսֆոր
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
ফসফরাস
فسفر
ફૉસ્ફરસનો
फास्फोरस
Fosfor
Fosfori
Foszfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Паликандур
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosfor
فوسفور
Fosfor
Fosforoa
ფოსფორი
[fūsfūr]
זרחן
Fosfru
Lìn
リン
인
ฟอสฟอรัส
Photpho
磷
Posporo
Fosfor
Pūtūtae-whetū
Fosforus
ഫോസ്ഫറസ്
பொஸ்பரசு
Fosofo
Fosforase
Posfori
Fósforo
Phusphuru
Fosforimi
Fosforo
Fosforon
Pesticium
The bioplastics – High potential through coordinated actionNovamont Spa
"The bioplastics – High potential through coordinated action"
Francesco Degli Innocenti
Ecology of Products and Environmental Communication, Director Novamont
http://www.novamont.com
fdi@novamont.com
The Bordeaux Aquitaine RCE has launched a new strategy focused on three areas: learning cities, climate change adaptation, and education for sustainable development. This strategy will be implemented through partnerships across the region. The RCE is working with the city of Bordeaux on learning city initiatives and climate adaptation as part of a large national innovation program. It is also coordinating efforts on education for sustainable lifestyles and development. The overall goal is to better coordinate education approaches and develop a holistic vision of sustainable society through initiatives like reconceptualizing curricula.
ECOGESTUS Lda Consultor joão vaz ECOVALOR o caso alemão _enJoao Vaz
Germany has a large recycling industry that employs many people and contributes significantly to reducing CO2 emissions. However, since ending DSD's monopoly on packaging waste management in 2005, there have been issues with transparency, incentives for reusable packaging, and the rise of unlicensed operators not paying fees. While Germany recycles and recovers a high percentage of its municipal and commercial waste, it has failed to meet reusable packaging targets. The system is now trying to improve with a new single-bin approach and better sorting facilities, but critics argue it needs more transparency and policies to encourage truly sustainable packaging.
This document provides an overview of waste prevention programs in the EU. It defines waste prevention and outlines the EEA's activities in reviewing member countries' waste prevention programs. As of February 2014, 20 countries had published waste prevention programs, which differ in whether they are separate programs or part of wider waste management plans. The programs address various sectors and waste types, with some having quantitative targets and others qualitative targets or status quo goals. Instruments used range from informative to promotional to administrative to economic. Stakeholder involvement also varies. Little information is given on costs or cost savings of the programs. Overall, the programs differ substantially and experience implementing them is still limited.
The EU FLEGT Action Plan aims to curb illegal logging by promoting sustainable and legal timber trade between the EU and producer countries. It establishes Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) that require producer countries to demonstrate legally-sourced timber using a Legality Assurance System that tracks timber sources. The plan also encourages sustainable procurement policies and regulates illegally sourced timber imports into the EU through the EU Timber Regulation.
The document discusses EU research and innovation activities within the Horizon 2020 and LIFE programs managed by the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME). It provides an overview of the programs, including funding amounts and relevant topics in areas like the circular economy and nutrient recovery. Examples of funded projects are also described. Looking ahead, it announces upcoming calls for proposals and opportunities to get involved as an independent expert.
Slides from the 2nd day of the European Nutrient Event, 19 october 2017, Basel: http://www.nweurope.eu/projects/project-search/phos4you-phosphorus-recovery-from-waste-water-for-your-life/
More information on www.phosphorusplatform.eu/R&D
European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP)
www.phosphorusplatform.eu
Sustainable management of nutrients is crucial for agriculture, food, industry, water and the environment. ESPP brings together companies and stakeholders to address the Phosphorus Challenge and its opportunities for the circular economy.
Countries:
Austria AT
Belgium BE
Bulgaria BG
Cyprus CY
Czech Republic CZ
Germany DE
Denmark DK
Estonia EE
Spain ES
Finland FI
France FR
Greece EL
Hungary HU
Ireland IE
Italy IT
Lithuania LT
Luxembourg LU
Latvia LV
Malta MT
Netherlands NL
Poland PL
Portugal PT
Romania RO
Sweden SE
Slovenia SI
Slovakia SK
United Kingdom UK
Switzerland CH
Phosphorus:
Fosfor
Fosfor
Fòsfòr
Фосфор
Fosfor
Фосфор
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosforas
Fosfors
Fuosfuors
Fosfor
Ffуsfforws
Fosfar
Fosfaras
Fosfaar
Fosforus
Φωσφορος
Ֆոսֆոր
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
ফসফরাস
فسفر
ફૉસ્ફરસનો
फास्फोरस
Fosfor
Fosfori
Foszfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Паликандур
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosfor
فوسفور
Fosfor
Fosforoa
ფოსფორი
[fūsfūr]
זרחן
Fosfru
Lìn
リン
인
ฟอสฟอรัส
Photpho
磷
Posporo
Fosfor
Pūtūtae-whetū
Fosforus
ഫോസ്ഫറസ്
பொஸ்பரசு
Fosofo
Fosforase
Posfori
Fósforo
Phusphuru
Fosforimi
Fosforo
Fosforon
Pesticium
The bioplastics – High potential through coordinated actionNovamont Spa
"The bioplastics – High potential through coordinated action"
Francesco Degli Innocenti
Ecology of Products and Environmental Communication, Director Novamont
http://www.novamont.com
fdi@novamont.com
The Bordeaux Aquitaine RCE has launched a new strategy focused on three areas: learning cities, climate change adaptation, and education for sustainable development. This strategy will be implemented through partnerships across the region. The RCE is working with the city of Bordeaux on learning city initiatives and climate adaptation as part of a large national innovation program. It is also coordinating efforts on education for sustainable lifestyles and development. The overall goal is to better coordinate education approaches and develop a holistic vision of sustainable society through initiatives like reconceptualizing curricula.
The EU Action Plan against wildlife traffickingOECD Governance
OECD HIGH LEVEL RISK FORUM
Task Force on Countering Illicit Trade
WCO-OECD Regional Policy Dialogue on
Countering Illicit Trade: Addressing the Governance Gaps in Europe
WCO Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
7-8 November 2016
https://www.eiseverywhere.com/file_uploads/baa570ac042f8bd70259b7688aaa07cb_AgendaVERSION4.pdf
The EU Action Plan against wildlife trafficking
Presentation by Gaël de Rotalier – European Commission, at the WCO and OECD R...OECD Governance
Presentation by Gaël de Rotalier – European Commission, at the WCO and OECD Regional Policy Dialogue, 7-8 November 2016, Brussels. For more information see www.oecd.org/gov/risk/oecdtaskforceoncounteringillicittrade.htm
Presenter: Chris Thornton
European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP)
www.phosphorusplatform.eu
Sustainable management of nutrients is crucial for agriculture, food, industry, water and the environment. ESPP brings together companies and stakeholders to address the Phosphorus Challenge and its opportunities for the circular economy.
Countries:
Austria AT
Belgium BE
Bulgaria BG
Cyprus CY
Czech Republic CZ
Germany DE
Denmark DK
Estonia EE
Spain ES
Finland FI
France FR
Greece EL
Hungary HU
Ireland IE
Italy IT
Lithuania LT
Luxembourg LU
Latvia LV
Malta MT
Netherlands NL
Poland PL
Portugal PT
Romania RO
Sweden SE
Slovenia SI
Slovakia SK
United Kingdom UK
Switzerland CH
Phosphorus:
Fosfor
Fosfor
Fòsfòr
Фосфор
Fosfor
Фосфор
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosforas
Fosfors
Fuosfuors
Fosfor
Ffуsfforws
Fosfar
Fosfaras
Fosfaar
Fosforus
Φωσφορος
Ֆոսֆոր
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
ফসফরাস
فسفر
ફૉસ્ફરસનો
फास्फोरस
Fosfor
Fosfori
Foszfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Паликандур
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosfor
فوسفور
Fosfor
Fosforoa
ფოსფორი
[fūsfūr]
זרחן
Fosfru
Lìn
リン
인
ฟอสฟอรัส
Photpho
磷
Posporo
Fosfor
Pūtūtae-whetū
Fosforus
ഫോസ്ഫറസ്
பொஸ்பரசு
Fosofo
Fosforase
Posfori
Fósforo
Phusphuru
Fosforimi
Fosforo
Fosforon
Pesticium
The document discusses key principles for the successful implementation of the Industrial Emissions Directive in order to achieve sustainable environmental protection in Europe. It argues that the directive will only be successful if it: 1) preserves transparent processes and involves experienced stakeholders, 2) leaves space for justified flexibility at the local level, and 3) promotes an integrated approach to environmental protection that ensures optimal societal benefit.
Environmental Justice in an Intercultural Frame – Empowering Local Communitie...ESD UNU-IAS
Environmental Justice in an Intercultural Frame – Empowering Local Communities for Sustainability
Martin O’Connor, RCE Paris-Seine
Europe Regional RCE Meeting 2018
28-31 August, 2018, Vannes, France
Author: Chris Thornton
Organization: European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP, www.phosphorusplatform.eu)
Title: Summary ESPP working meeting on recycled nutrients in EU Fertiliser Regulation revision
Date: 29 June 2016
Countries:
Austria AT
Belgium BE
Bulgaria BG
Cyprus CY
Czech Republic CZ
Germany DE
Denmark DK
Estonia EE
Spain ES
Finland FI
France FR
Greece EL
Hungary HU
Ireland IE
Italy IT
Lithuania LT
Luxembourg LU
Latvia LV
Malta MT
Netherlands NL
Poland PL
Portugal PT
Romania RO
Sweden SE
Slovenia SI
Slovakia SK
United Kingdom UK
Switzerland CH
Phosphorus:
Fosfor
Fosfor
Fòsfòr
Фосфор
Fosfor
Фосфор
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosforas
Fosfors
Fuosfuors
Fosfor
Ffуsfforws
Fosfar
Fosfaras
Fosfaar
Fosforus
Φωσφορος
Ֆոսֆոր
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
ফসফরাস
فسفر
ફૉસ્ફરસનો
फास्फोरस
Fosfor
Fosfori
Foszfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Паликандур
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosfor
فوسفور
Fosfor
Fosforoa
ფოსფორი
[fūsfūr]
זרחן
Fosfru
Lìn
リン
인
ฟอสฟอรัส
Photpho
磷
Posporo
Fosfor
Pūtūtae-whetū
Fosforus
ഫോസ്ഫറസ്
பொஸ்பரசு
Fosofo
Fosforase
Posfori
Fósforo
Phusphuru
Fosforimi
Fosforo
Fosforon
Pesticium
Slides from the 2nd day of the European Nutrient Event, 19 october 2017, Basel: http://www.nweurope.eu/projects/project-search/phos4you-phosphorus-recovery-from-waste-water-for-your-life/
More information on www.phosphorusplatform.eu/R&D
European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP)
www.phosphorusplatform.eu
Sustainable management of nutrients is crucial for agriculture, food, industry, water and the environment. ESPP brings together companies and stakeholders to address the Phosphorus Challenge and its opportunities for the circular economy.
Countries:
Austria AT
Belgium BE
Bulgaria BG
Cyprus CY
Czech Republic CZ
Germany DE
Denmark DK
Estonia EE
Spain ES
Finland FI
France FR
Greece EL
Hungary HU
Ireland IE
Italy IT
Lithuania LT
Luxembourg LU
Latvia LV
Malta MT
Netherlands NL
Poland PL
Portugal PT
Romania RO
Sweden SE
Slovenia SI
Slovakia SK
United Kingdom UK
Switzerland CH
Phosphorus:
Fosfor
Fosfor
Fòsfòr
Фосфор
Fosfor
Фосфор
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosforas
Fosfors
Fuosfuors
Fosfor
Ffуsfforws
Fosfar
Fosfaras
Fosfaar
Fosforus
Φωσφορος
Ֆոսֆոր
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
ফসফরাস
فسفر
ફૉસ્ફરસનો
फास्फोरस
Fosfor
Fosfori
Foszfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Паликандур
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosfor
فوسفور
Fosfor
Fosforoa
ფოსფორი
[fūsfūr]
זרחן
Fosfru
Lìn
リン
인
ฟอสฟอรัส
Photpho
磷
Posporo
Fosfor
Pūtūtae-whetū
Fosforus
ഫോസ്ഫറസ്
பொஸ்பரசு
Fosofo
Fosforase
Posfori
Fósforo
Phusphuru
Fosforimi
Fosforo
Fosforon
Pesticium
The document discusses the Europeana Newspapers Project, which aims to aggregate 18 million digitized historic newspaper pages from 12 European libraries. It will improve search capabilities by creating full text for 8 million pages and undertaking article segmentation and named entity extraction for 2 million pages. It will also develop a cross-searchable newspapers browser. The project addresses challenges in working with fragile historic newspapers and creating an interface that provides value to users while respecting the wishes of contributing libraries. It discusses how content and functionality will vary depending on what each library provides. The goal is to create a resource that is useful for historians, researchers, and other users.
Symposium case 2 j. quoden (EXPRA), experience from packaging recovery organi...OECD Environment
1) Joachim Quoden has over 20 years of experience working in packaging waste recovery and recycling in various roles in Germany and at the European level.
2) EXPRA is an alliance of packaging compliance schemes from 16 European countries and others that work closely with industry and local authorities on packaging waste issues.
3) EPR systems in Europe function in different ways, with some having industry fully responsible for collection and recycling, others having shared responsibility with municipalities, and others using tradable credit systems. Guidelines being developed by the EU aim to identify best practices.
Stiglitz Christian. Packaging waste management following the extended produce...ECO-invest
This document provides an overview of packaging waste management in Europe following the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) principle between 1995 and 2012. It discusses key EU waste stream regulations based on EPR, including for packaging and packaging waste. It then details the Austrian experience with the EPR system for packaging waste management operated by ARA, covering topics like collection and recovery rates, involved partners, and services provided.
EaP GREEN: Experience of the implementation of EU Directives based on EPR pri...OECD Environment
The document discusses the implementation of EU directives based on extended producer responsibility (EPR) principles. It provides an overview of EU waste legislation and targets for various waste streams. It also describes a study on EPR systems in Europe that analyzed different EPR models, identified best practices, and proposed options to promote optimal use of EPR. The study examined EPR systems for various waste streams in multiple EU countries through in-depth case studies.
Fritz Flanderka:
Managing Director at Reclay Group, responsible for legal/public affairs and strategy since 2005
20+ years experience in the development of postconsumer waste management programs, including designing and implementing EPR for Germany‘s Green Dot scheme Founder and former Managing Director of PRO Europe Author of numerous publications on EPR
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) plays a pivotal role in funding, coordinating and facilitating the recycling of consumer flexible and all packaging. CEFLEX and its stakeholders have been working to ensure EPR mechanisms are able to drive cost-effective collection and recycling of flexible packaging to make it circular, sustainable and economically viable.
This webinar from April 2020 by CEFLEX and EXPRA - Extended Producer Responsibility Alliance outlines some of the key issues and mechanisms.
France has implemented 14 extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes since 1992 to promote sustainable materials management. Producers fulfill their obligations by setting up collective producer responsibility organizations (PROs), which are non-profit companies governed by producers. There are two models of EPR scheme operation: "financial" schemes where municipalities remain in charge of waste management and "organizational" schemes where PROs are directly in charge. Governance of the PROs focuses on participative dialogue and negotiation of detailed terms of reference between stakeholders every six years. EPR schemes in France now collect over 1.4 billion euros annually and redistribute about 700 million euros to municipalities. Key ongoing questions center around the appropriate balance of responsibilities between PROs and municipalities
“Retos de la economía circular en el embalaje para apelar a la responsabilida...ANEPMA
This document summarizes a presentation given by Joachim Quoden, the Managing Director of EXPRA, on the challenges of circular economy in packaging. Some key points:
- EXPRA is an alliance of non-profit packaging waste recovery and recycling systems owned by obliged industry across Europe and Israel. It aims to improve services and promote sustainable EPR schemes.
- EPR implementation varies across countries, from dual models with industry responsibility to shared responsibility between industry and municipalities. Data quality on recycling rates also varies between countries.
- New EU proposals include more ambitious recycling targets, changing the measurement point to post-recycling, and vague EPR criteria that don't address key issues. EXPR
Esquemas inclusivos de Responsabilidad Extendida del Productor: aprendizajes,...ReciclajeInclusivo
This document discusses extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes. It provides an overview of EPR, describing the underlying drivers and giving examples from different countries and industries. Key lessons are that EPR programs must consider local waste pickers and informal recycling sectors to be successful, and that no two national EPR programs are exactly the same due to different economic, social and policy contexts. Choosing the right approach depends on having a solid fact base and testing different program elements to learn what works best locally.
Jornada Técnica sobre Responsabilidad Extendida del Productor - Steve Slaus -...ConexiónReciclado
The document discusses the viability of implementing an extended producer responsibility (EPR) system for packaging waste in Argentina based on lessons from Belgium.
It summarizes Belgium's EPR system for packaging, which transposed EU directives into national law, sets recycling and recovery targets, and designates roles for producers, municipalities, and accredited organizations. A public-private partnership between industry and municipalities achieves high recycling rates through optimized collection and quality control.
The document then considers factors for Argentina to develop an appropriate EPR system, given existing informal waste picking and the need for data. It outlines potential collection scenarios and stresses the importance of realistic legislation and designating clear roles for all stakeholders, including waste pickers, in a new
Redesigning Producer Responsibility: A new EPR is needed for a circular economySustainable Brands
The document analyzes current extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes in 15 major European cities. It finds that on average, EPR schemes only cover 45% of total product waste generated in municipal solid waste, and less than one-third of total municipal waste. There is significant variation between cities. The document calls for a new approach to EPR that more comprehensively addresses the full lifecycle of products and promotes a circular economy through better design, reuse, and recycling.
EaP GREEN: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) - The French ExperienceOECD Environment
The presentation discusses the French practices related to extended producer responsibility schemes. It was delivered at the meeting on "Economic instruments for greener products in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia" (EaP GREEN).
12-13 May 2016 - India's Policy Dialogue: International Workshop on Extended Producer Responsibility in India: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons from International Experience, New Delhi, India.
4.2 M. Sponar, guiding principles from EU experienceOECD Environment
The document discusses an upcoming study on extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes in the EU. It outlines the study's objectives to identify best practices and minimum requirements for effective EPR schemes. The study analyzes six waste streams in depth and identifies lessons from case studies of EPR schemes in various EU countries. Key findings show the variety of EPR approaches across countries and waste types. The document proposes several principles for guidance, including defining clear objectives, ensuring transparency, fair competition, and covering the true and full costs of waste management. Next steps include publishing the study and adopting new EPR requirements and waste targets.
The EU Action Plan against wildlife traffickingOECD Governance
OECD HIGH LEVEL RISK FORUM
Task Force on Countering Illicit Trade
WCO-OECD Regional Policy Dialogue on
Countering Illicit Trade: Addressing the Governance Gaps in Europe
WCO Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
7-8 November 2016
https://www.eiseverywhere.com/file_uploads/baa570ac042f8bd70259b7688aaa07cb_AgendaVERSION4.pdf
The EU Action Plan against wildlife trafficking
Presentation by Gaël de Rotalier – European Commission, at the WCO and OECD R...OECD Governance
Presentation by Gaël de Rotalier – European Commission, at the WCO and OECD Regional Policy Dialogue, 7-8 November 2016, Brussels. For more information see www.oecd.org/gov/risk/oecdtaskforceoncounteringillicittrade.htm
Presenter: Chris Thornton
European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP)
www.phosphorusplatform.eu
Sustainable management of nutrients is crucial for agriculture, food, industry, water and the environment. ESPP brings together companies and stakeholders to address the Phosphorus Challenge and its opportunities for the circular economy.
Countries:
Austria AT
Belgium BE
Bulgaria BG
Cyprus CY
Czech Republic CZ
Germany DE
Denmark DK
Estonia EE
Spain ES
Finland FI
France FR
Greece EL
Hungary HU
Ireland IE
Italy IT
Lithuania LT
Luxembourg LU
Latvia LV
Malta MT
Netherlands NL
Poland PL
Portugal PT
Romania RO
Sweden SE
Slovenia SI
Slovakia SK
United Kingdom UK
Switzerland CH
Phosphorus:
Fosfor
Fosfor
Fòsfòr
Фосфор
Fosfor
Фосфор
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosforas
Fosfors
Fuosfuors
Fosfor
Ffуsfforws
Fosfar
Fosfaras
Fosfaar
Fosforus
Φωσφορος
Ֆոսֆոր
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
ফসফরাস
فسفر
ફૉસ્ફરસનો
फास्फोरस
Fosfor
Fosfori
Foszfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Паликандур
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosfor
فوسفور
Fosfor
Fosforoa
ფოსფორი
[fūsfūr]
זרחן
Fosfru
Lìn
リン
인
ฟอสฟอรัส
Photpho
磷
Posporo
Fosfor
Pūtūtae-whetū
Fosforus
ഫോസ്ഫറസ്
பொஸ்பரசு
Fosofo
Fosforase
Posfori
Fósforo
Phusphuru
Fosforimi
Fosforo
Fosforon
Pesticium
The document discusses key principles for the successful implementation of the Industrial Emissions Directive in order to achieve sustainable environmental protection in Europe. It argues that the directive will only be successful if it: 1) preserves transparent processes and involves experienced stakeholders, 2) leaves space for justified flexibility at the local level, and 3) promotes an integrated approach to environmental protection that ensures optimal societal benefit.
Environmental Justice in an Intercultural Frame – Empowering Local Communitie...ESD UNU-IAS
Environmental Justice in an Intercultural Frame – Empowering Local Communities for Sustainability
Martin O’Connor, RCE Paris-Seine
Europe Regional RCE Meeting 2018
28-31 August, 2018, Vannes, France
Author: Chris Thornton
Organization: European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP, www.phosphorusplatform.eu)
Title: Summary ESPP working meeting on recycled nutrients in EU Fertiliser Regulation revision
Date: 29 June 2016
Countries:
Austria AT
Belgium BE
Bulgaria BG
Cyprus CY
Czech Republic CZ
Germany DE
Denmark DK
Estonia EE
Spain ES
Finland FI
France FR
Greece EL
Hungary HU
Ireland IE
Italy IT
Lithuania LT
Luxembourg LU
Latvia LV
Malta MT
Netherlands NL
Poland PL
Portugal PT
Romania RO
Sweden SE
Slovenia SI
Slovakia SK
United Kingdom UK
Switzerland CH
Phosphorus:
Fosfor
Fosfor
Fòsfòr
Фосфор
Fosfor
Фосфор
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosforas
Fosfors
Fuosfuors
Fosfor
Ffуsfforws
Fosfar
Fosfaras
Fosfaar
Fosforus
Φωσφορος
Ֆոսֆոր
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
ফসফরাস
فسفر
ફૉસ્ફરસનો
फास्फोरस
Fosfor
Fosfori
Foszfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Паликандур
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosfor
فوسفور
Fosfor
Fosforoa
ფოსფორი
[fūsfūr]
זרחן
Fosfru
Lìn
リン
인
ฟอสฟอรัส
Photpho
磷
Posporo
Fosfor
Pūtūtae-whetū
Fosforus
ഫോസ്ഫറസ്
பொஸ்பரசு
Fosofo
Fosforase
Posfori
Fósforo
Phusphuru
Fosforimi
Fosforo
Fosforon
Pesticium
Slides from the 2nd day of the European Nutrient Event, 19 october 2017, Basel: http://www.nweurope.eu/projects/project-search/phos4you-phosphorus-recovery-from-waste-water-for-your-life/
More information on www.phosphorusplatform.eu/R&D
European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform (ESPP)
www.phosphorusplatform.eu
Sustainable management of nutrients is crucial for agriculture, food, industry, water and the environment. ESPP brings together companies and stakeholders to address the Phosphorus Challenge and its opportunities for the circular economy.
Countries:
Austria AT
Belgium BE
Bulgaria BG
Cyprus CY
Czech Republic CZ
Germany DE
Denmark DK
Estonia EE
Spain ES
Finland FI
France FR
Greece EL
Hungary HU
Ireland IE
Italy IT
Lithuania LT
Luxembourg LU
Latvia LV
Malta MT
Netherlands NL
Poland PL
Portugal PT
Romania RO
Sweden SE
Slovenia SI
Slovakia SK
United Kingdom UK
Switzerland CH
Phosphorus:
Fosfor
Fosfor
Fòsfòr
Фосфор
Fosfor
Фосфор
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosforas
Fosfors
Fuosfuors
Fosfor
Ffуsfforws
Fosfar
Fosfaras
Fosfaar
Fosforus
Φωσφορος
Ֆոսֆոր
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
ফসফরাস
فسفر
ફૉસ્ફરસનો
फास्फोरस
Fosfor
Fosfori
Foszfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Паликандур
Fosfor
Fosfor
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Фосфор
Fosfor
فوسفور
Fosfor
Fosforoa
ფოსფორი
[fūsfūr]
זרחן
Fosfru
Lìn
リン
인
ฟอสฟอรัส
Photpho
磷
Posporo
Fosfor
Pūtūtae-whetū
Fosforus
ഫോസ്ഫറസ്
பொஸ்பரசு
Fosofo
Fosforase
Posfori
Fósforo
Phusphuru
Fosforimi
Fosforo
Fosforon
Pesticium
The document discusses the Europeana Newspapers Project, which aims to aggregate 18 million digitized historic newspaper pages from 12 European libraries. It will improve search capabilities by creating full text for 8 million pages and undertaking article segmentation and named entity extraction for 2 million pages. It will also develop a cross-searchable newspapers browser. The project addresses challenges in working with fragile historic newspapers and creating an interface that provides value to users while respecting the wishes of contributing libraries. It discusses how content and functionality will vary depending on what each library provides. The goal is to create a resource that is useful for historians, researchers, and other users.
Symposium case 2 j. quoden (EXPRA), experience from packaging recovery organi...OECD Environment
1) Joachim Quoden has over 20 years of experience working in packaging waste recovery and recycling in various roles in Germany and at the European level.
2) EXPRA is an alliance of packaging compliance schemes from 16 European countries and others that work closely with industry and local authorities on packaging waste issues.
3) EPR systems in Europe function in different ways, with some having industry fully responsible for collection and recycling, others having shared responsibility with municipalities, and others using tradable credit systems. Guidelines being developed by the EU aim to identify best practices.
Stiglitz Christian. Packaging waste management following the extended produce...ECO-invest
This document provides an overview of packaging waste management in Europe following the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) principle between 1995 and 2012. It discusses key EU waste stream regulations based on EPR, including for packaging and packaging waste. It then details the Austrian experience with the EPR system for packaging waste management operated by ARA, covering topics like collection and recovery rates, involved partners, and services provided.
EaP GREEN: Experience of the implementation of EU Directives based on EPR pri...OECD Environment
The document discusses the implementation of EU directives based on extended producer responsibility (EPR) principles. It provides an overview of EU waste legislation and targets for various waste streams. It also describes a study on EPR systems in Europe that analyzed different EPR models, identified best practices, and proposed options to promote optimal use of EPR. The study examined EPR systems for various waste streams in multiple EU countries through in-depth case studies.
Fritz Flanderka:
Managing Director at Reclay Group, responsible for legal/public affairs and strategy since 2005
20+ years experience in the development of postconsumer waste management programs, including designing and implementing EPR for Germany‘s Green Dot scheme Founder and former Managing Director of PRO Europe Author of numerous publications on EPR
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) plays a pivotal role in funding, coordinating and facilitating the recycling of consumer flexible and all packaging. CEFLEX and its stakeholders have been working to ensure EPR mechanisms are able to drive cost-effective collection and recycling of flexible packaging to make it circular, sustainable and economically viable.
This webinar from April 2020 by CEFLEX and EXPRA - Extended Producer Responsibility Alliance outlines some of the key issues and mechanisms.
France has implemented 14 extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes since 1992 to promote sustainable materials management. Producers fulfill their obligations by setting up collective producer responsibility organizations (PROs), which are non-profit companies governed by producers. There are two models of EPR scheme operation: "financial" schemes where municipalities remain in charge of waste management and "organizational" schemes where PROs are directly in charge. Governance of the PROs focuses on participative dialogue and negotiation of detailed terms of reference between stakeholders every six years. EPR schemes in France now collect over 1.4 billion euros annually and redistribute about 700 million euros to municipalities. Key ongoing questions center around the appropriate balance of responsibilities between PROs and municipalities
“Retos de la economía circular en el embalaje para apelar a la responsabilida...ANEPMA
This document summarizes a presentation given by Joachim Quoden, the Managing Director of EXPRA, on the challenges of circular economy in packaging. Some key points:
- EXPRA is an alliance of non-profit packaging waste recovery and recycling systems owned by obliged industry across Europe and Israel. It aims to improve services and promote sustainable EPR schemes.
- EPR implementation varies across countries, from dual models with industry responsibility to shared responsibility between industry and municipalities. Data quality on recycling rates also varies between countries.
- New EU proposals include more ambitious recycling targets, changing the measurement point to post-recycling, and vague EPR criteria that don't address key issues. EXPR
Esquemas inclusivos de Responsabilidad Extendida del Productor: aprendizajes,...ReciclajeInclusivo
This document discusses extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes. It provides an overview of EPR, describing the underlying drivers and giving examples from different countries and industries. Key lessons are that EPR programs must consider local waste pickers and informal recycling sectors to be successful, and that no two national EPR programs are exactly the same due to different economic, social and policy contexts. Choosing the right approach depends on having a solid fact base and testing different program elements to learn what works best locally.
Jornada Técnica sobre Responsabilidad Extendida del Productor - Steve Slaus -...ConexiónReciclado
The document discusses the viability of implementing an extended producer responsibility (EPR) system for packaging waste in Argentina based on lessons from Belgium.
It summarizes Belgium's EPR system for packaging, which transposed EU directives into national law, sets recycling and recovery targets, and designates roles for producers, municipalities, and accredited organizations. A public-private partnership between industry and municipalities achieves high recycling rates through optimized collection and quality control.
The document then considers factors for Argentina to develop an appropriate EPR system, given existing informal waste picking and the need for data. It outlines potential collection scenarios and stresses the importance of realistic legislation and designating clear roles for all stakeholders, including waste pickers, in a new
Redesigning Producer Responsibility: A new EPR is needed for a circular economySustainable Brands
The document analyzes current extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes in 15 major European cities. It finds that on average, EPR schemes only cover 45% of total product waste generated in municipal solid waste, and less than one-third of total municipal waste. There is significant variation between cities. The document calls for a new approach to EPR that more comprehensively addresses the full lifecycle of products and promotes a circular economy through better design, reuse, and recycling.
EaP GREEN: Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) - The French ExperienceOECD Environment
The presentation discusses the French practices related to extended producer responsibility schemes. It was delivered at the meeting on "Economic instruments for greener products in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia" (EaP GREEN).
12-13 May 2016 - India's Policy Dialogue: International Workshop on Extended Producer Responsibility in India: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons from International Experience, New Delhi, India.
4.2 M. Sponar, guiding principles from EU experienceOECD Environment
The document discusses an upcoming study on extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes in the EU. It outlines the study's objectives to identify best practices and minimum requirements for effective EPR schemes. The study analyzes six waste streams in depth and identifies lessons from case studies of EPR schemes in various EU countries. Key findings show the variety of EPR approaches across countries and waste types. The document proposes several principles for guidance, including defining clear objectives, ensuring transparency, fair competition, and covering the true and full costs of waste management. Next steps include publishing the study and adopting new EPR requirements and waste targets.
This unit provides an overview of waste policy development at the EU level, from initial concerns over public health and the environment to the current focus on limiting resource consumption and promoting a circular economy. It outlines key EU waste directives including the Waste Framework Directive, Landfill Directive, and Industrial Emissions Directive. It also discusses producer responsibility legislation and the recent Circular Economy Package, which aims to further increase recycling and promote eco-design through new targets and actions.
12-13 May 2016 - India's Policy Dialogue
International Workshop on Extended Producer Responsibility in India: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons from International Experience, New Delhi, India.
4.5 S. Arditi, NGO perspective on policy guidanceOECD Environment
1) The document discusses extending producer responsibility (EPR) to better promote resource productivity and waste prevention in increasingly resource-constrained economies.
2) It proposes making the feedback loop between product and waste policy stronger by linking ecodesign requirements to treatment standards under EPR schemes. This could help EPR incentivize design for the environment and durability.
3) The document also questions whether the scope of EPR should expand to include collection costs, to avoid issues like "cherry picking" and ensure proper incentives throughout the product lifecycle. It explores options for optimizing collection costs to further promote circularity.
Supporting narrative for Corrugated of Course benefits presentationfefco
The document presents the benefits of corrugated packaging through a slide presentation. Corrugated packaging provides economic benefits by maximizing value and driving costs out of the supply chain. It protects products through the supply chain and is made entirely from renewable wood fiber. Corrugated packaging is also fully recyclable and helps reduce food waste, which has a greater environmental impact than packaging. Consumers also prefer paper-based packaging like corrugated.
This document summarizes a study that evaluates the efficiency of Serbia's packaging waste management system, which is based on an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme. The analysis finds that Serbia has made progress in developing administrative and institutional approaches for packaging waste management that have helped it reach national recovery targets through its EPR system. However, there are still main challenges that must be addressed, including increasing the low supply of recyclables recovered from municipal waste, closing loopholes affecting the recycling industry and PROs, and formalizing the role of the informal recycling sector within the formal framework. The document provides context on EPR systems and packaging waste policies in the EU to frame the analysis of Serbia's system.
Regional Environmental Center for CEE countriesCSCP
The document summarizes information from a conference on collective actions towards sustainable consumption and production. It discusses the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC), which works on environmental projects in Europe and beyond. Some key points made in the document include:
- The REC works on over 300 projects annually with a focus on sustainable consumption and production.
- Europeans overwhelmingly consider the environmental impact of products they purchase and support eco-labels and carbon footprint labeling.
- Common actions that have the greatest impact on environmental problems include buying energy efficient products and improving energy efficiency in general.
- The REC promotes SCP in the region through projects and working with organizations like the European Environment Agency on reporting and analyses.
Similar to Responsabilité élargie du producteur (20)
Avis d'Appel d'Offres N°: 01-2018 relatif à l'exploitation des centres de transfert de déchets ménagers et assimilés
Lot 1: Le Kram et La Goulette
Lot 2: Bardo et Tébourba
Résultat des candidats sélectionnés (1ère étape) relatif au concours externe pour le recrutement de 7 ingénieurs principaux 6 techniciens supérieurs et 2 administrateurs
"آلية القبول الاجتماعي بالمنشآت والعلاقة مع الأطراف المتداخلة"
مداخلة تم تقديمها يوم الأربعاء 29 نوفمبر 2017 على هامش تظاهرة
"MEGARA CHALLENGE TUNISIA 2017"
تقدم تنفيذ إحكام التصرف في نفايات الأنشطة الصحية
مشروع النهوض بالطرق الفنية والعملية المثلى للتصرف في نفايات الأنشطة الصحية ومادة ثنائية الفنيل متعدد الكلور "PCB" بالبلاد التونسية
Présentation des "Projets programmés et orientations des cahiers des charges de concession" à l'occasion de la rencontre "Jeudi des Déchets" du 13 avril 2017
Présentation d'une "Planification de la gestion des déchets solides urbaines et solutions d’amélioration" à l'occasion de la rencontre "Jeudi des Déchets" du 13 avril 2017
More from Agence Nationale de Gestion des Déchets (20)
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as t...vijaykumar292010
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as the Directive 2002/95/EC. It includes the restrictions for the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. RoHS is a WEEE (Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment).
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
1. Spin-off Rostock University / Department
of waste and resource management
1
Extended Producer
Responsibility:
International Experiences
Sabine Bartnik (cyclos GmbH)
Les Jeudis des Déchets
Filière de Gestion des déchets plastiques ECOLEF:
Les perspectives d’optimisation
Tunis, jeudi 22 février 2018
2. 2
1 Introduction
2 Main Focus „Packaging“
3 What does „EPR“ mean and how can „EPR“ be organized?
4 EPR-systems for Packaging in Europe
3. 3
cyclos
One of Germany‘s leading waste management and material flow consulting companies
Specialisation in strategy and policy development, auditing, compliance assurance and research
Clients include municipal waste management authorities, private enterprises, government entities
on federal and state level and industry associations
Technical expertise
Independent and non-partisan
Factual and analytical
Hands-on and practical
Creative and unique solutions
PhilosophyFacts
Founded 1993
Over 40 employees
16 publicly certified experts on
packaging disposal
3 publicly certified experts on
WEEE disposal
Offices in Berlin and Osnabrück
4. 4
cyclos is an expert and consulting company with focus on waste management and
product responsibility. cyclos carries out projects worldwide on extended producer
responsibility and develops strategies for waste management issues.
Consulting & policy development
Extended Producer Responsibility
Strategies for a high quality recycling
of waste textiles
Sorting analyses
Waste management strategies
Certifications: Recycling plants for
plastic and special materials
Expert services: German Deposit
System
Expert services: Electrical Equipment
Act
Expert services: Packaging disposal
Our services
5. 5
Reinheit Existenz Ewigkeit
• a spin-off of the professorship of waste and resource management at the
University of Rostock
• experience in international knowledge and technology transfer in waste
management in the MENA countries.
6. 6
ACTORS OF
THE
PROJECT
ANGed:
National
Agency of
Waste
Management
CITET:
International
Center for
Environmental
Technologies
ANPE: National
Agency for
Environmental
Protection
RETech:
German
Recycling
Technologies
Rostock
University/
Envero GmbH
cyclos GmbH
With the support of GIZ, cyclos and envero are currently working together in Tunisia on a
project to set up a system for the countrywide collection and recycling of packaging waste
on the basis of extended producer responsibility.
7. 7
1 Introduction
2 Main Focus „Packaging“
3 What does „EPR“ mean and how can „EPR“ be organised?
4 EPR-systems for Packaging in Europe
9. 9
A relevant share of the deposited waste is packaging
Landfill Amman; September 2017
Photo: Bünemann, 09/2017
10. 10
1 Introduction
2 Main Focus „Packaging“
3 What does „EPR“ mean and how can „EPR“ be organised?
4 EPR-systems for Packaging in Europe
11. 11
EPR – Basic principle
“EPR-System for packaging”
“EPR” stands for Extended Producer Responsibility
• Producer’s responsibility for a product is extended to the postconsumer stage of a
product’s life.
• Producers become responsible for disposal of their packaging already during
production and with the sale (and export).
• Producers/importers pay a contribution for later disposal of the packaging already
when their packed goods are placed on the market.
• The contribution/fee is used for collecting, recycling and disposing the packaging
waste.
• This is to ensure environmentally compatible recycling and disposal after use.
12. 12
EPR – Basic principle of financing
Consumer
(purchases through distributor and
later disposal for recycling)
Producer
(filler/importer
transfers packaged goods through a
distributor to the consumer)
Disposer
(collection, recycling, disposal by
private or municipal disposal)
€
Packaging flow:
Cash flow:
13. 13
Consumer
(purchases through distributor and
later disposal for recycling)
Producer
(filler, importer =>
transfer of packaged goods through a
distributor to the consumer)
Disposer
(collection, recycling, disposal by
private or municipal disposal)
Path of packaging:
Flow of money in the system:
€
Financing and
organisation of the
EPR either through
one or several
system operators
(PRO).
€
EPR – Basic principle of organisation
15. 16
Collection, sorting
and recycling of
packaging waste
Basic principle of organisation - Obligated companies
Commissioning
and payment
Distributor (= Producer/Bottler/Importer)
Producer X
Producer and importer pay
for system-participation
when the product is placed
on the market and are
responsible for the
implementation within the
system.
Producer Y
Producer Z
Financing and organisation of
the EPR either through one
ore several system operators
(PRO)
Information: Within the scope of the EPR-system in Germany the distributors pay around 1 billion Euro to
the system operators.
16. 17
Government and Management Authorities:
Regulations and Controlling
Extended Producer Responsibility – Basic principle
Importer,
Bottler,
Producer
Organisation
of all
works of the
system
Waste
Management
/ Recycler
Municipalitiy
They pay for
each ton of
packaging of the
products they sell
in a country
Pays for waste
management,
communication,
littering,…
17. 18
Integration of local authorities
In some countries the contributions which the system operators receive are given to
the municipalities.
In this case municipalities have to fulfill the tasks like collecting, sorting, recycling.
Producer
Collective
scheme
Municipality
Waste
management
company
Producer
Collective
scheme
Waste
management
company
18. 19
Important services of the EPR-system
• Development of a concept for a substainable and practicable waste management
• Establishment of the organisational structure
• Installation of an infrastructure for the collecting of packaging
• Installation of an infrastructure for the recycling
• Communication, waste advice, training, special education, etc.
• Activities against littering, for pollution control of waters and deserts
• Installation of a functional controllsystem
=> All these points must be defined in a law
19. 20
1 Introduction
2 Main Focus „Packaging“
3 What does „EPR“ mean and how can „EPR“ be organised?
4 EPR-systems for Packaging in Europe
20. 21
EPR-systems in Europe
• An action plan for the Circular Economy of the European Commission makes
concrete specifications for EPR-systems.
• Currently EPR is implemented in 25 of 28 EU member states at varying intensity
and different models.
• These examples have shown which systems are practicable.
• But due to the different situations in the respective countries, the models can not
be directly transferred.
21. 22
PRO EUROPE
PRO EUROPE
is the umbrella organisation
of 31 national producer
responsibility systems
engaged in the selective
collection and recycling of
packaging waste
http://www.pro-e.org/
22. 23
Expra
EXPRA (EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY ALLIANCE)
EXPRA is the umbrella organisation for packaging and packaging waste recovery and
recycling systems which are owned by obliged industry and work on a not-for-profit
basis.
Member compliance schemes of EXPRA are today in place in sixteen EU member states:
Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Finland,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Sweden (but also span to
Canada, Israel, Macedonia, Norway and Turkey).
http://www.expra.eu/
23. 24
Different EPR-models (packaging)
Basic decisions are needed about financial and organisational responsibilities, scope,
collection system, competition, not-for-profit, surveillance,…
1. PROs in the hand of obliged industry (e.g. Belgium, France, Netherlands, Spain)
2. PROs not in the hand of obliged industry, competition between PROs (e.g. Germany)
3. PROs dual to municipal waste management (e.g. Germany, Austria)
4. Shared Responsibility between industry and local authorities (e.g. Belgium, France,
Netherlands, Spain)
5. Nationwide coverage or regional assignment
6. Only collective PROs or also individual solutions
7. Different scopes: PROs only for household packaging (waste arising at the municipal
level) (e.g. Germany, France, Spain), PROs required for all types of packaging waste
(e.g. Belgium, Netherlands)
25. 26
• Separate collection
• Main collection system: Gelber Sack (yellow bag), Gelbe Tonne (yellow bin) or
Wertstofftonne (recycling bin – including “material identical waste” made of plastics and
metals).
Waste containers for LWP
(yellow bin)
Bag for LWP
(yellow bag)
LWP after collection
Collection of lightweight packaging (LWP) in Germany
26. 27
Separate collection of lightweight packaging in Germany
PET
ALU
PS
LIQUID BOARD
PP TINPLAT
E
PE
FOILS
27. 29
Basic principle of EPR in Germany
Producer pays for
system participation
when the product is
placed on the market
Disposal is financed
by paid
contributions
Collection, sorting
and recycling of
packaging waste
Producer 1
Producer 3
Producer 2
Producer
xy
Several
system
operators
are
responsible
for
collection,
recovery.
Own take-back system and recycling of packaging
Collection, sorting
and recycling of
packaging waste
Management of
paid
contributions:
(not for packaging from households)
Packaging sold to households: the Producers are obliged to contract with a system operator
28. 30
• Producers/distributors selling packed products pay licensing fees (contributions) to the
private system operator
• System operators publish invitations to tender for the collection of LWP – more than 450
contracts in total.
• Sorting services are covered by separate tenders.
• The recycling is organized either by the sorting contractors or the system operators.
• System operator have to document mass flow across the entire chain (distributed volume,
collected, sorted and recycled volumes).
• A certification to proof their eligibility as a recipient of plastic, paper-board compounds or
liquid board packaging is required of processing or recycling plants.
The dual system operators
29. 32
Turnover of the German dual system (sales packaging)
Turnover of the EPR-System (all operators) for packaging from 1993 to 2011 (Bill. €)
The overall turnover of the dual system in Germany (sum of all operators)
decreased from around 2 billion € per year to about 1 billion € per year in 2011. At
the moment the amount is higher than in 2011.
Source: bundeskartellamt, 03.12.2012
Germany has around 80 Mio. residents. The system costs around 12 €/year and resident
30. 33
Lightweight packaging – Costs in Germany in 2015
Overall costs for collection, sorting, recycling and municipal services:
284 €/t of lightweight packaging
Collected amount of lightweight packaging: about 2.4 million tons in 2015
Overall costs for lightweight packaging: 682 million € in 2015
Data: cyclos 2015
31. 35
The sorting plants at the beginning
Bag-
opener
Screen Magnetic
Separator
Sorting Cabin
Bunkers
HollowArticles
(Bottles)
PlasticFilms
MixedPlastic
BeverageCartons
OtherComposites
Aluminium
Tinplate
Waste
32. 36
Sorting lightweight packaing – flowchart (different plastic types)
23.02.2018
Packaging
container/ bag / bring
system
bag opener
classification
wind sifting
magnetic separation
wind sifting
NIR tetra
eddy current separation
NIR mixed plastics
NIR paper and board
NIR standard polymer
residue
SORTING
mixed plastic
(rigid)
PE PET residue ferrous metals /
tinplate
mixed
plastics
film
> 220 mm
20-220 mm
< 20 mm
non-ferrous
metals
NIR tetra
tetra paper and
board
PP PS
NIR paper/tetra/PET
COLLECTION
sorting products
42. 46
The municipalities are responsible for the nationwide collection of household packaging. They
conclude contracts with CITEO (before Eco-Emballages). CITEO pays 80 % of the costs. CITEO
is a non-profit company.
Packaged goods manufacturers and importers are responsible for the recovery of packaging
waste from households through an approved compliance system.
Companies not joining a compliance system must either introduce a deposit scheme or else
set up their own government-approved collection system (e.g. Leclerc for plastic bags).
• Glass is mainly collected via bring-it-yourself containers at central collection points (street
collection is optional).
• For around 75 % of the population, the collection of plastic packaging is currently limited
to bottles (beverages, shampoo, detergent, etc. made of PET and HDPE). 2022 the
collection of all plastic packaging shall be available for all inhabitants.
• Depending on the local setup, paper/carton, aluminium, steel and plastics are collected
either separately or together in recycling bins or bags.
EPR and collection system in France
(since 09/2017)
43. 47
Prices of producers and importers in France (Eco-Emballages/CITEO)
Packaging material 01/2004 –
09/2010
10/2010 –
12/2010
01/2011 –
12/2011
Since 2012 2016 2018
Steel 0.0226 0.0282 0.0302 0.0315 0.0315 0.0443
Aluminium 0.0453 0.0566 0.0606 0.0928 0.0928 0.1038
Paper & cardboard 0.1221 0.1526 0.1633 0.1633 0.1633 0.1630
Brick packs
(beverage cartons)
0.1221 0.1526 0.1633 0.1704 0.1704 0.2474
PET and HDPE from
bottles
0.1778 0.2222 0.2378 0.2422 0.2422
0.3123Other plastic bottles 0.1778 0.2222 0.2378 0.2447 0.2447
Other plastics 0.1778 0.2222 0.2378 0.2806 0.2806
Glass 0.0036 0.0045 0.0048 0.0121 0.0121 0.0142
Other materials 0.1221 0.1526 0.1633 0.2329 0.2329 0.3123
Basic fee by weight of material (EUR per kg)
Plus a contribution for each unit (according to the number of elements used)
Additional bonus/penalty system to encourage reducing and recyclability.
44. 48
Eco-Emballages / Adelphe 2016
€0,46
0,30 €
0,10 €
0,07 €
0,04 € 0,03 €
1 euro paid to Eco-Emballages was used to…
Collection
Sorting
Energetic Recovery
(support)
Communication
Functioning Eco-
Emballages
R&D
Source: http://www.ecoemballages.fr/sites/default/files/files/espace-presse/ecoemballages-rapport-annuel-2016_0.pdf
2016: 654 millions € contribution – 10.30 € per inhabitant
46. 50
Summary
• EPR systems can be major contributors to recycling.
• EPR systems are securing the financing of part of the waste management.
• The European Packaging Directive has allowed a great deal of leeway for
implementation. Therefore, different EPR systems could be implemented with
adaptation according to country and circumstances.
• Producers should be involved in building the EPR system right from the start.
• Politics and government agencies are important in setting the framework, the
approval of EPR systems and regular monitoring.
• Tunisia already has important and practical experience with ECO-lef. ECO-lef provides
a very good basis for further development of an EPR system.
49. 53
Collection systems in Belgium
In Belgium household packaging is financed, collected and recycled via FOST Plus.
Fost Plus is in the hand of the obliged industry. It is a not-for-profit system.
• Paper and cardboard is collected via a close-to-home collection system
(monthly).
• Glass is collected mainly via a bring-it-yourself system (central container
collection separated by transparent and colour). FOST Plus must guarantee to
provide at least one glass container per 700 inhabitants.
• Lightweight packaging (only plastic bottles, metal and liquid packaging
boards) are predominantly (ca. 88%) collected via a close-to-home collection at
least twice a month in blue bags and taken to sorting plants afterwards.
• Other plastic packaging like yoghurt cups, plastic bags, etc. are not collected
separately but added to the energetic recovery via residue waste. But in 2019
the separate collection will be expanded to all types plastic packaging.
50. 54
Fost Plus - Sorting rules PMD (plastic, metal, drink cartons)
Source: https://www.fostplus.be/en/sorting-recycling/all-about-sorting/sorting-rules-pmd
51. 55
Prices of producers and importers in Belgium
Furtheron a licence fee between 0,1 and 6 cent per packaging unit has to be payed.
Packaging material € per kg in 2012 € per kg in 2016
Glass 0.0231 0.0293
Paper and cardboards (> 85% cellulose) 0.0202 0.0185
Steel (> 50%) 0.0525 0.0848
Aluminium (>50%; >50 µm) 0.0654 0.0353
PET and HDPE from bottles 0.1387 0.1471
Beverage carton 0.2848 0.2498
Other recyclable materials 0.3273 0.2873
Other, non recyclable materials 0.4304 0.3161
52. 56
Belgium has 11,3 million inhabitents the system costs 12 € per inhabitant each year.
Source: FostPlus 2014
Costs for the EPR-system for packaging in Belgium (2014)
55. 59
In the Netherlands EPR is central organised by “Afvalfonds”. Municipalities are responsible for
the collecting, sorting and recycling of all packaging. The PRO is in he hand of the obliged
industry. It is a not-for-profit system.
• Glass is collected via central containers separated by colour (local containers and
underground containers; about one container per 1,000 inhabitants) and municipal
recycling centres.
• Paper and cardboard is collected via waste paper collection bins in households.
• Concerning plastics, the municipalities have the choice to collect only plastic bottles
and (dimensionally stable) hollow bodies, or to collect them together with every
other plastic packaging in a close-to-the-home collection system (so called
„bronscheiding“).
EPR and collection systems in the Netherlands
56. 60
Packaging material € per kg
2013 / 2014 / 2015 2016
Glass 0,0595 0,0560
Paper and cardboard 0,0233 0,0220
Aluminium 0,0212 0,0200
Plastics 0,3876 0,6400
Biodegradable plastics 0,0212 0,0200
Other metalls 0,0212 0,0200
Woods 0,0212 0,0200
Other materials 0,0212 0,0200
Deposit bottles 0,0212 0,0200
Beverage cartons 0,1200 0,1800
Other compounds 0,4700 0,7700
Plasticbottles without deposits 7,5000 7,5000
21 % VAT have to be payed on this contributions in addition
Development of prices for producers and importers in the Netherlands
59. 63
Two EPR-systems: Ecoembes for LWP and packaging made of paper and Ecovidrio
for glass packaging. Only household packaging under EPR.
Once a product is consumed, the packaging ceases to serve the function for which it
was created and it becomes waste, at which point it must be recovered so that it can
be recycled, thus contributing to care for the environment.
To make it possible to pick up the packaging waste generated at households,
Ecoembes partners with local and regional governments so that over 46 million
Spaniards can recycle their packaging waste.
Plastic containers, cans and cartons go in the yellow container, and paper and
cardboard containers go in the blue one. In all there are over 572.739 yellow and blue
containers available throughout Spain to deposit packaging waste.
Collection systems in Spain
60. 64
Collection systems in Spain
lightweight packaging Paper and board Glass Residues
Bottles and plastic
containers: products of
hygiene and cleaning,
tubes, trays, wrappers
and bags.
Metal packaging: cans,
aluminum pans,
aerosol, cans of
deodorant lids and
metal caps.
Cartons of milk, fruit
juices, soups, etc.
Paper and cardboard
boxes: containers of
food, footwear, frozen
products, paper
wrapping, paper
everyday, etc.
Glass bottles: wine,
champagne or liquor.
Glass bottles: perfume,
Cologne or similar.
Food jars: jam,
preserves, vegetables,
etc.
All other types of waste
such as food, plants,
organic materials.
municipalities
61. 65
Collection systems in Spain
In Spain exist approx. 90 sorting plants
Automatic separation into 3 categories:
• Plastic packaging
• Metal packaging
• Liquid packaging board
Manual separation:
• PET, PE-HD, plastic film and mixed plastics
• Ferrous metals, aluminium
• Liquid packaging board