Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Research 3.0 & the Future of Scholarly Communications
Similar to Research 3.0 & the Future of Scholarly Communications (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Research 3.0 & the Future of Scholarly Communications
- 1. research 3.0 & the future of scholarly communications richard j. bookman richter library university of miami 18 july 2012
- 7. NIH Purchasing Power – 2003-2013 NIH Purchasing Power – 2003-2013 $32 $31.0 $30.5 $30.7 $30.6 $30.7 $30 $29.3 $29.0 $27.9 $28.5 $28.5 $27.1 $28 $26.9 $26.4 Billions $25.3 $26 $24.8 $23.9 $24.2 $23.9 $24 $23.0 $22.4 $21.9 $22 $20 $18 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Current Constant (BRDPI) Senate Labor-HHS BA only Labor-HHS NIHonly Sources: BA Budget Office; House and Senate Appropriations Committees Sources: NIH Budget Office; House and Senate Appropriations Committees
- 8. NIH Grant Success Rates FY 1978-2012
- 10. Over the past decade, before pursuing a particular line of research, scientists (including C.G.B.) in the haematology and oncology department at the biotechnology firm Amgen in Thousand Oaks, California, tried to confirm published findings related to that work. Fifty- three papers were deemed 'landmark' studies. It was acknowledged from the outset that some of the data might not hold up, because papers were deliberately selected that described something completely new, such as fresh approaches to targeting cancers or alternative clinical uses for existing therapeutics. Nevertheless, scientific findings were confirmed in only 6 (11%) cases. Even knowing the limitations of preclinical research, this was a shocking result.
- 11. you may ask yourself… …how did we get here?
- 12. hypothetical model of the evolution & structure of science daniel zeller 2007
- 13. research 1.0 who’s doing research? who’s paying for research? how is research organized? how is research communicated?
- 16. Morrill Act of 1862 the endless frontier 1945 bayh-dole act of 1980
- 21. research 2.x who’s doing research? who’s paying for research? how is research organized? how is research communicated?
- 23. rewards & incentives matter…
- 25. need curiosity fame fortune
- 27. time for a new version… in a rapidly evolving context
- 28. big bang
- 33. the internet of things big bang
- 34. every the internet of things ^ big data
- 36. research 3.0
- 37. hints of 3.0…..
- 42. ?
- 43. 1.0 megapub per year… …and that’s just medline.
- 49. Producing research objects 1. Research: Each object in the system has metadata metadata (including provenance) and relations to other data objects metadata added to it. metadata 2. Workflow: All data objects used by or created in the lab are captured within a (lab-owned) workflow system. 3. Authoring: A communication is written in an authoring tool which can pull data objects with provenance from the workflow tool in the appropriate representation into the document. metadata 4. Editing and review: Once the co-authors agree, the paper is ‘exposed’ to editors, who in turn expose it to reviewers. Reports metadata are stored in the authoring/editing system, the paper gets updated, until it is validated. 5. Publishing and distribution: When a document is published, a collection of validated research objects is exposed to the world. Document remains connected to its Rats were subjected to two related data objects, and their provenance can be traced. tests (click on fig 2 to see underlying data). These results 6. (Re-)User applications: distributed applications run suggest that the neurological (autonomously?) on the set of exposed data objects. pain produced by …. Some other publisher Review Revise Edit Concept modified from one developed by Anita de Waard, Ed Hovy, Phil Bourne, Gully Burns and Cartic Ramakrishnan
- 51. re-useful is the new useful
- 52. research 3.0 who’s doing research? who’s paying for research? how is research organized? how is research communicated?
- 53. what’s next?
- 55. put the science first
- 56. libraries ?
- 57. flip the library
- 58. cloudminders
- 59. research 3.0 & the future of scholarly communications
Editor's Notes
- Image is Gerhard Richter painting.http://www.gerhardrichterpainting.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/gerhardrichter_photo3.jpgWhat follows are the slides from a talk to the UM library community and other interested folks.The slides are NOT a stand-alone representation of the substance of the talk. Mostly, they illustrate some aspect of a point made in my talk.
- http://www.gerhardrichterpainting.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/gerhardrichter_photo7.jpgbroad brush strokes…mostly focus on science – natural or social….not so much humanities
- sabbatical – a time to step back and reflect…..
- http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-flNnHy6l9Nc/T-nt716AI4I/AAAAAAAAGxQ/QWTLtCfUNsE/s1600/alltheyear3.jpg
- http://graphics.eiu.com/upload/dna.jpg
- Nature 483 531-533 (29 March 2012) doi:10.1038/48351ainteresting comment in May, 2012….can’t disclose which papers bec/ of confidentiality agreements between Amgen and authors of the original papers.
- photograph taken of archival print of Zeller ink and acrylic drawing.this Zeller work is part of scimaps.org.http://scimaps.org/maps/map/hypothetical_model_o_51/
- research ecosystem: the entire system by which humans create new knowledge, encompassing language, technology, governance, dissemination, etc.many questions we need to explore to describe the evolution of how humans do research, but today’s talk will emphasize 4.
- Newton: 1643-1727 – overlaps w/ start of Phil. Trans.Charles Darwin atapprox age of Beagle voyage.
- The first issue, 6 March 1665, was edited and published by the society’s first secretary, Henry Oldenburg, only six years after the Royal Society was founded. He published the journal at his own expense and had an agreement with the Royal Society that he kept any profits. He was to be disappointed, however, as the journal performed poorly during Oldenburg’s lifetime.Source: redOrbit (http://s.tt/1aL0Z)Darwin’s paper w/ Wallace:http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/philosophy/linnean_society_darwin_wallace.bmp
- 3 forces acting to push from R1.0 to R2.0
- http://cnx.org/content/m34582/latest/graphics4.png
- Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genomeNature409, 860-921 (15 February 2001) | doi:10.1038/35057062; Received 7 December 2000; Accepted 9 January 2001http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v409/n6822/full/409860a0.html
- ibid.
- key change is institutionalization or corporatization of research from R1 to R2.
- http://blogs.jwatch.org/hiv-id-observations/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/unintended-consequences.jpgnow the institutions have an interest that is not always aligned with either the scientist or society….let alone the science.
- and scientists’ behavior can be shaped…
- http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Uf8aRwoaSJ8/TS0PqvkTw9I/AAAAAAAAANE/c372nzbb-7k/s1600/Church+of+Covenant+-+Tower+Collapse+at+construction+time+%25282%2529.jpgOne of the Washington's greatest losses in historic religious structures was the old National Presbyterian Church, originally called the Church of the Covenant, which used to rise from the southeast corner of Connecticut Avenue and N Street NW. The building, which James M. Goode has called a "dignified masterpiece in gray granite," was completed in 1889 and torn down in 1966, to be replaced by a nondescript office building.Construction of the main church began in 1887 and was nearly complete when the 158-foot Ohio-sandstone tower suddenly collapsed into a heap of rubble early on the morning of August 22, 1888. What caused the collapse? Fingers were pointed in all directions. "It was the fault of the contractor; it was the fault of the architect; it was the fault of the trustees, of the material, of the mortar, of everything and of nothing," the Post reported with exasperation. An official investigation soon concluded that the basic design was sound but that inferior materials and workmanship were to blame for the accident. The mortar, in particular, was found to be "practically worthless." The architect, contractors, and Church congregation agreed to divide the cost of reconstruction equally, and a new and very solid tower was soon standing.
- George Dyson has laid out the ideas and the history of the big bang of the digital universe in a number of places including:Darwin Among the Machines (1997)Turing’s Cathedral (2012)and in this Edge Conversation: http://edge.org/conversation/a-universe-of-self-replicating-code/…and a nice video of his talk at The Perimeter Institute:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tg5gJxXBh8s
- http://nothingoutofnothing.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/bigbang.jpg
- http://www.theremainsoftheweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/alan.turing.2.jpg“It is possible to invent a single machine which can be used to compute any computable sequence.”
- JvN: “I am thinking about something much more important than bombs. I am thinking about computers.”The IAS computer in 1952.Numbers that ‘mean’ things vs. numbers that ‘do’ things. Adjectives versus verbs.Code that can modify code.
- overlay graphic: http://www.evolutionoftheweb.com/staticAl Gore invents the internet – image underneath….
- http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/02/01/a-combinatorial-approach-to-density-hales-jewett/
- http://www.galaxyzoo.org/Which types of problems can be attacked with Polymath or Galaxy Zoo type approaches?
- http://www.patientslikeme.com/about17 July 2012
- http://www.kaggle.com/16 July 2012
- http://dobby.dyndns.biz/constantamateur/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Gold-Bars-in-Fort-Knox.jpg
- data from pubmed, week of July 16, 2007.Search:# of pubs - Search (”XXXX/1/1"[Date - Publication] : ”XXXX/12/31"[Date - Publication]), where XXXX ranges from 1940 to 2012.# of citations: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/bsd_key.html
- Citation: Lerch JK, Kuo F, Motti D, Morris R, Bixby JL, et al. (2012) Isoform Diversity and Regulation in Peripheral and Central Neurons Revealed through RNA-Seq. PLoS ONE 7(1): e30417. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030417
- http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
- http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030417July 15, 2012
- http://force11.org/about
- http://www.wf4ever-project.org/wiki/display/docs/Research+Object+model
- modified fromhttp://www.slideshare.net/anitawaard/whats-wrong-with-research-papers-and-how-can-we-fix-it
- http://www.executablepapers.com/
- they call it re-search for a reason…
- think this through at 4 levels
- photo is RJBookman, Quebec, 2008 – RMB Panner trip.CC-BY
- http://www.gerhardrichterpainting.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/gerhardrichter_photo3.jpg