The document discusses outcomes of research projects and how they differ from outputs and impact. It provides an example of an outcome from an Acacia research project in Uganda where districts implemented an electronic health information system. The document emphasizes that outcomes are changes influenced by a project but not fully controlled by it, and can be unintended.

1. Reflecting on results from the Acacia research projects Dakar, 6 October 2009

3. The fish soup development story

4. Inspired by Monika Jetzin, GWP Hungary Parents support Parents worry Outcome Children consider the soup delicious and eat fish soup once a week for the rest of their lives Parents control

5. What do these three types of results look like in Acacia research projects? Outcomes

9. Getting from outputs to impact is just like cooking fish soup…right? Wrong! If only social change were so easy.

10. Conventional logic for achieving results Inspired by Jeff Conklin, cognexus.org ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS OUTCOMES IMPACT INPUTS Plan Goals Time

11. If only the Acacia world were so simple!

14. Thus, an alternative planning, monitoring and evaluation method is required ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS OUTCOMES IMPACT INPUTS

15. IMPACT OUTPUT OUTCOME INPUTS ACTIVITY INPUTS ACTIVITY INPUTS ACTIVITY INPUTS OUTPUT OUTPUT ACTIVITY OUTPUT OUTPUT OUTCOME OUTCOME OUTCOME OUTCOME OUTCOME OUTCOME

16. Results in summary

17. Inputs, activities and outputs are under your control and the results more or less foreseeable. Outcomes that you do not control and cannot predetermine but can influence. Impact is long-term, profound change to which you eventually may contribute

23. In summary This is what a fully formulated outcome looks like

24. On 18 January 2008, Malawi’s Ministry of Information granted an international gateway licence (IGL) to MAREN, “the Malawi Research and Education Network”, without charge. Outcome : The Malawi Communication and Regulatory Authority (MACRA) manages spectrum allocation, licensing of cellular providers, granting of TV and radio licences. It grants the international gateway license (IGL) that allows individual service providers to have their own signalling access codes. The fees for an IGL go into a public service fund for expanding access into the less serviced areas but many African countries have highly priced their IGL as a way of restricting service providers from acquiring the license. In the case of Malawi, MACRA limited licenses to two entities – the Malawi Telecommunications Limited (MTL) and ESCOM (the power utility company). After two years of lobbying by the UbuntuNet Alliance, on 18 January 2008, Malawi’s Ministry of Information granted an international gateway licence to MAREN, without charge! The licence was later gazetted by Parliament with fuller details. Malawi will interconnect the UbuntuNet network with Mozambique, Tanzania and Zambia. Significance : Obtaining an IGL is necessary for an academic network such as Acacia’s partner PAREN and its UbuntuNet Alliance for Research and Education Networking to cross borders. Furthermore, reducing the costs of acquiring international gateway licenses is seen as a first step toward lowering the high cost of African telecommunications. The granting of another IGL in a country where only two were held previously is an indication of the recognition of the role of a national research and education network such a MAREN. It has raised the awareness of its role and positions MAREN to participate in regional UbuntuNet Alliance initiatives because the IGL means that there will be no legal or policy barriers to this interconnection. When there is an occasion for license holders to be consulted such as about decisions about fibre cables, MAREN is always invited. For example MAREN was represented at NEPAD broadband infrastructure meetings nationally and in South Africa and was also part of the World Bank Consultation on the Malawi Fibre backbone. Contribution of the research network : Beginning in 2005, the UbuntuNet Alliance supported its Malawian member MAREN in lobbying the permanent secretaries and the minister and making presentations to the Malawi Communication and Regulatory Authority (MACRA), using examples from Mozambique and Kenya.

25. And this is the potential of mapping your outcomes

26. OUTCOMES leading to POLICY CHANGES and PRACTICE CHANGES President declares women's land inheritance a right Ten widows take late husbands’ family to court Court decides landmark case in favour of widow Agricultural union admits widows as members Religious leader declares women's land inheritance a right Policy change Legislature passes women’s right to land inheritance law Agriculture committee discusses draft law Women’s group launches campaign Legislator drafts law Widow takes late husband’s family to court For the first time, press runs story on women’s land inheritance Finance committee discusses draft law Court decides against widow Late husbands’ families murder three widows Women’s group initiates legal aid for widows Over the past 5 years, in 90% of the cases the Land Commission has given to widows the titles of their late husbands’ land Practice change Land Commission approves regulations for women’s inheritance of deceased husband’s land

27. Questions or comments?